A small tool to view real-world ActivityPub objects as JSON! Enter a URL
or username from Mastodon or a similar service below, and we'll send a
request with
the right
Accept
header
to the server to view the underlying object.
{
"@context": [
"https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams",
{
"ostatus": "http://ostatus.org#",
"atomUri": "ostatus:atomUri",
"inReplyToAtomUri": "ostatus:inReplyToAtomUri",
"conversation": "ostatus:conversation",
"sensitive": "as:sensitive",
"toot": "http://joinmastodon.org/ns#",
"votersCount": "toot:votersCount",
"Hashtag": "as:Hashtag"
}
],
"id": "https://zirk.us/users/ChrisMayLA6/statuses/113904799079920619",
"type": "Note",
"summary": null,
"inReplyTo": null,
"published": "2025-01-28T07:28:22Z",
"url": "https://zirk.us/@ChrisMayLA6/113904799079920619",
"attributedTo": "https://zirk.us/users/ChrisMayLA6",
"to": [
"https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public"
],
"cc": [
"https://zirk.us/users/ChrisMayLA6/followers"
],
"sensitive": false,
"atomUri": "https://zirk.us/users/ChrisMayLA6/statuses/113904799079920619",
"inReplyToAtomUri": null,
"conversation": "tag:zirk.us,2025-01-28:objectId=147525840:objectType=Conversation",
"content": "<p>Labour want firms with defined benefit pensions schemes in surplus to be able to access that surplus for investment (suggested by Jeremy Hunt before the election).</p><p>You'll recall in the past when DB pension plans were in deficit, rather than make up shortfalls, many were shifted to defined contribution (transferring risk to members) or effectively wound up.</p><p>One might argue DB schemes now in surplus *were* supported by their sponsoring firms but this still looks skewed to me.</p><p><a href=\"https://zirk.us/tags/pensions\" class=\"mention hashtag\" rel=\"tag\">#<span>pensions</span></a> <br />h/t FT</p>",
"contentMap": {
"en": "<p>Labour want firms with defined benefit pensions schemes in surplus to be able to access that surplus for investment (suggested by Jeremy Hunt before the election).</p><p>You'll recall in the past when DB pension plans were in deficit, rather than make up shortfalls, many were shifted to defined contribution (transferring risk to members) or effectively wound up.</p><p>One might argue DB schemes now in surplus *were* supported by their sponsoring firms but this still looks skewed to me.</p><p><a href=\"https://zirk.us/tags/pensions\" class=\"mention hashtag\" rel=\"tag\">#<span>pensions</span></a> <br />h/t FT</p>"
},
"attachment": [],
"tag": [
{
"type": "Hashtag",
"href": "https://zirk.us/tags/pensions",
"name": "#pensions"
}
],
"replies": {
"id": "https://zirk.us/users/ChrisMayLA6/statuses/113904799079920619/replies",
"type": "Collection",
"first": {
"type": "CollectionPage",
"next": "https://zirk.us/users/ChrisMayLA6/statuses/113904799079920619/replies?only_other_accounts=true&page=true",
"partOf": "https://zirk.us/users/ChrisMayLA6/statuses/113904799079920619/replies",
"items": []
}
},
"likes": {
"id": "https://zirk.us/users/ChrisMayLA6/statuses/113904799079920619/likes",
"type": "Collection",
"totalItems": 9
},
"shares": {
"id": "https://zirk.us/users/ChrisMayLA6/statuses/113904799079920619/shares",
"type": "Collection",
"totalItems": 8
}
}