ActivityPub Viewer

A small tool to view real-world ActivityPub objects as JSON! Enter a URL or username from Mastodon or a similar service below, and we'll send a request with the right Accept header to the server to view the underlying object.

Open in browser →
{ "@context": [ "https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams", { "ostatus": "http://ostatus.org#", "atomUri": "ostatus:atomUri", "inReplyToAtomUri": "ostatus:inReplyToAtomUri", "conversation": "ostatus:conversation", "sensitive": "as:sensitive", "toot": "http://joinmastodon.org/ns#", "votersCount": "toot:votersCount" } ], "id": "https://zirk.us/users/lawrenceevalyn/statuses/113245806467784043", "type": "Note", "summary": null, "inReplyTo": "https://tldr.nettime.org/users/festal/statuses/113244845992408781", "published": "2024-10-03T22:17:53Z", "url": "https://zirk.us/@lawrenceevalyn/113245806467784043", "attributedTo": "https://zirk.us/users/lawrenceevalyn", "to": [ "https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public" ], "cc": [ "https://zirk.us/users/lawrenceevalyn/followers", "https://tldr.nettime.org/users/festal", "https://vmst.io/users/KaiserOfNone" ], "sensitive": false, "atomUri": "https://zirk.us/users/lawrenceevalyn/statuses/113245806467784043", "inReplyToAtomUri": "https://tldr.nettime.org/users/festal/statuses/113244845992408781", "conversation": "tag:tldr.nettime.org,2024-10-03:objectId=19720378:objectType=Conversation", "content": "<p><span class=\"h-card\" translate=\"no\"><a href=\"https://tldr.nettime.org/@festal\" class=\"u-url mention\">@<span>festal</span></a></span> <span class=\"h-card\" translate=\"no\"><a href=\"https://vmst.io/@KaiserOfNone\" class=\"u-url mention\">@<span>KaiserOfNone</span></a></span> Right now I think Wikipedia is trying to avoid the hot-button parts of the issue by emphasizing its already strong culture that information must be accurate, verifiable, and non-promotional. So there’s no need to waste time on the impossible question of proving an AI was involved; whether someone writes garbage by themselves or with an LLM, the garbage has to go.</p>", "contentMap": { "en": "<p><span class=\"h-card\" translate=\"no\"><a href=\"https://tldr.nettime.org/@festal\" class=\"u-url mention\">@<span>festal</span></a></span> <span class=\"h-card\" translate=\"no\"><a href=\"https://vmst.io/@KaiserOfNone\" class=\"u-url mention\">@<span>KaiserOfNone</span></a></span> Right now I think Wikipedia is trying to avoid the hot-button parts of the issue by emphasizing its already strong culture that information must be accurate, verifiable, and non-promotional. So there’s no need to waste time on the impossible question of proving an AI was involved; whether someone writes garbage by themselves or with an LLM, the garbage has to go.</p>" }, "attachment": [], "tag": [ { "type": "Mention", "href": "https://tldr.nettime.org/users/festal", "name": "@festal@tldr.nettime.org" }, { "type": "Mention", "href": "https://vmst.io/users/KaiserOfNone", "name": "@KaiserOfNone@vmst.io" } ], "replies": { "id": "https://zirk.us/users/lawrenceevalyn/statuses/113245806467784043/replies", "type": "Collection", "first": { "type": "CollectionPage", "next": "https://zirk.us/users/lawrenceevalyn/statuses/113245806467784043/replies?only_other_accounts=true&page=true", "partOf": "https://zirk.us/users/lawrenceevalyn/statuses/113245806467784043/replies", "items": [] } }, "likes": { "id": "https://zirk.us/users/lawrenceevalyn/statuses/113245806467784043/likes", "type": "Collection", "totalItems": 0 }, "shares": { "id": "https://zirk.us/users/lawrenceevalyn/statuses/113245806467784043/shares", "type": "Collection", "totalItems": 0 } }