A small tool to view real-world ActivityPub objects as JSON! Enter a URL
or username from Mastodon or a similar service below, and we'll send a
request with
the right
Accept
header
to the server to view the underlying object.
{
"@context": "https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams",
"type": "OrderedCollectionPage",
"orderedItems": [
{
"type": "Create",
"actor": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/942830475402027026",
"object": {
"type": "Note",
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/942830475402027026/entities/urn:activity:1147914858765684736",
"attributedTo": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/942830475402027026",
"content": "The highest honor of friendship isn't getting invited to \"that party\" or out on a girls weekend. It's not clinking champagne glasses at fancy brunches or wearing matching shirts on a beach in Florida. That all is nice and fun and good and special, but it's not what it's about, not at all. <br /><br />The real honor of friendship is being invited into someone's REAL. It's getting an invitation into the nitty gritty, the not-so-pretty, the hard stuff, the vulnerable stuff, the weird stuff, the unpolished stuff. It's being welcomed into a home where the sink is full of dishes and the laundry is covering the couch. It's entering the places of heart ache and pain. It's being invited to the hospital room when your friend is still in her mesh underwear from birth. It's sitting crosslegged in old sweats on the floor and laughing till you cry. It's carrying around secrets that you've been trusted to keep. It's listening and hearing. It's holding space for each other. It's answering phone calls just to talk something through. <br /><br />The highest honor of friendship isn't found in beautifully planned events or brightly filtered photos. <br /><br />The highest honor of friendship is messy and dingy and real. It's in unfiltered photos of laughing so hard your double chin is showing. It's loving each other's babies and holding each other while you ugly cry. <br /><br />I can't stress this enough:<br /><br />If you've been invited into even one person's real, you are blessed.<br /> <br />Cherish it.<br /> <br />Follow <a class=\"u-url mention\" href=\"https://www.minds.com/sisteriamwithyou\" target=\"_blank\">@sisteriamwithyou</a>. for more.<br /><br />Written by Wonderoak by Jess Johnston<br /><br /><br /><br />I agree <a href=\"https://www.minds.com/search?f=top&t=all&q=Genuinenhearts\" title=\"#Genuinenhearts\" class=\"u-url hashtag\" target=\"_blank\">#Genuinenhearts</a> <a href=\"https://www.minds.com/search?f=top&t=all&q=realrelationships\" title=\"#realrelationships\" class=\"u-url hashtag\" target=\"_blank\">#realrelationships</a> <a href=\"https://www.minds.com/search?f=top&t=all&q=truefriendships\" title=\"#truefriendships\" class=\"u-url hashtag\" target=\"_blank\">#truefriendships</a> ",
"to": [
"https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public"
],
"cc": [
"https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/942830475402027026/followers"
],
"tag": [],
"url": "https://www.minds.com/newsfeed/1147914858765684736",
"published": "2020-09-02T15:23:48+00:00",
"source": {
"content": "The highest honor of friendship isn't getting invited to \"that party\" or out on a girls weekend. It's not clinking champagne glasses at fancy brunches or wearing matching shirts on a beach in Florida. That all is nice and fun and good and special, but it's not what it's about, not at all. \n\nThe real honor of friendship is being invited into someone's REAL. It's getting an invitation into the nitty gritty, the not-so-pretty, the hard stuff, the vulnerable stuff, the weird stuff, the unpolished stuff. It's being welcomed into a home where the sink is full of dishes and the laundry is covering the couch. It's entering the places of heart ache and pain. It's being invited to the hospital room when your friend is still in her mesh underwear from birth. It's sitting crosslegged in old sweats on the floor and laughing till you cry. It's carrying around secrets that you've been trusted to keep. It's listening and hearing. It's holding space for each other. It's answering phone calls just to talk something through. \n\nThe highest honor of friendship isn't found in beautifully planned events or brightly filtered photos. \n\nThe highest honor of friendship is messy and dingy and real. It's in unfiltered photos of laughing so hard your double chin is showing. It's loving each other's babies and holding each other while you ugly cry. \n\nI can't stress this enough:\n\nIf you've been invited into even one person's real, you are blessed.\n \nCherish it.\n \nFollow @sisteriamwithyou. for more.\n\nWritten by Wonderoak by Jess Johnston\n\n\n\nI agree #Genuinenhearts #realrelationships #truefriendships ",
"mediaType": "text/plain"
}
},
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/942830475402027026/entities/urn:activity:1147914858765684736/activity"
},
{
"type": "Create",
"actor": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/942830475402027026",
"object": {
"type": "Note",
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/942830475402027026/entities/urn:activity:1147913867756507136",
"attributedTo": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/942830475402027026",
"content": "With what’s going on in the World today what are yours thoughts on the latest from the CDC?👇🧐",
"to": [
"https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public"
],
"cc": [
"https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/942830475402027026/followers"
],
"tag": [],
"url": "https://www.minds.com/newsfeed/1147913867756507136",
"published": "2020-09-02T15:19:52+00:00",
"source": {
"content": "With what’s going on in the World today what are yours thoughts on the latest from the CDC?👇🧐",
"mediaType": "text/plain"
}
},
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/942830475402027026/entities/urn:activity:1147913867756507136/activity"
},
{
"type": "Create",
"actor": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/942830475402027026",
"object": {
"type": "Note",
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/942830475402027026/entities/urn:activity:991011118975655936",
"attributedTo": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/942830475402027026",
"content": "Are y’all familiar with the effects on an electric bill when placing orgonite on or around your power meters?? I’ve done this experiment countless times is different states and always have had the same result. There is a strangle but definite drop in the power bill cost. I’ve read it’s due to orgonite ability to restructure electric fields. Causing the the power consumption to be more efficient and it waste less electricity through friction and stray emf released from the wires themselves. Has anyone else tested this experiment out??😄. Shared from a friend! <br /><br />Orgonite! Have you heard of it’s many uses? <a href=\"https://www.minds.com/search?f=top&t=all&q=health\" title=\"#health\" class=\"u-url hashtag\" target=\"_blank\">#health</a> <a href=\"https://www.minds.com/search?f=top&t=all&q=freespeech\" title=\"#freespeech\" class=\"u-url hashtag\" target=\"_blank\">#freespeech</a> <a href=\"https://www.minds.com/search?f=top&t=all&q=technology\" title=\"#technology\" class=\"u-url hashtag\" target=\"_blank\">#technology</a> <a href=\"https://www.minds.com/search?f=top&t=all&q=minds\" title=\"#minds\" class=\"u-url hashtag\" target=\"_blank\">#minds</a> <a href=\"https://www.minds.com/search?f=top&t=all&q=outdoors\" title=\"#outdoors\" class=\"u-url hashtag\" target=\"_blank\">#outdoors</a>",
"to": [
"https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public"
],
"cc": [
"https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/942830475402027026/followers"
],
"tag": [],
"url": "https://www.minds.com/newsfeed/991011118975655936",
"published": "2019-06-27T16:04:22+00:00",
"source": {
"content": "Are y’all familiar with the effects on an electric bill when placing orgonite on or around your power meters?? I’ve done this experiment countless times is different states and always have had the same result. There is a strangle but definite drop in the power bill cost. I’ve read it’s due to orgonite ability to restructure electric fields. Causing the the power consumption to be more efficient and it waste less electricity through friction and stray emf released from the wires themselves. Has anyone else tested this experiment out??😄. Shared from a friend! \n\nOrgonite! Have you heard of it’s many uses? #health #freespeech #technology #minds #outdoors",
"mediaType": "text/plain"
}
},
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/942830475402027026/entities/urn:activity:991011118975655936/activity"
},
{
"type": "Create",
"actor": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/942830475402027026",
"object": {
"type": "Note",
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/942830475402027026/entities/urn:activity:973339831552733184",
"attributedTo": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/942830475402027026",
"content": "In 1957, future U.S. president, Rep Gerald Ford and others gave the U.S. Pentagon permission to aggressively deploy offensive biological agents. There are no recorded cases of AIDS prior to the 1957 creation of “Special Operation-X.” (The SOX) program served as the immediate prototype program for the Special Virus program to begin in 1962.<br /><br />In 1961, scientist Haldor Thomar publishes that viruses cause cancer. In 1995, he and Carlton Gajdusek informed the National Academy of Sciences that “the study of visna in sheep would be the best test for candidate anti-HIV drugs.”<br /><br />In 1962, under the cover of cancer research, the United States charts a path to commit premeditated murder, the “Special Virus” program begins on February 12th. Dr. Len Hayflick sets up a U.S. mycoplasma laboratory at Stanford University. Many believe the “Special Virus” program began in November 1961 with a Phizer contract.<br /><br />Beginning in 1963 and for every year thereafter, the “Special Virus” program conducted annual progress reviews at Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, PA. The annual meetings are representative of the aggressive nature in which the United States pursued the development of AIDS.<br /><br />In 1964, the United States Congress gave full support for the leukemia/lymphoma (AIDS) virus research.<br /><br />In 1967, the National Academy of Sciences launched a full scale assault on Africa. The CIA (Technical Services Division) acknowledged its secret inoculator program.<br /><br />In 1969, Fort Detrick told world scientists and the Pentagon asked for more money, they knew they could make AIDS. Nixon’s July 18 secret memo to Congress on “Overpopulation” serves as the start of the paper trail of the AIDS Holocaust.<br /><br />In 1970, President Nixon signed PL91-213 and John D. Rockefeller, III became the “Population Czar.” Nixon’s August 10 National Security Memo leaves no doubt as to the genocidal nature of depopulation.<br /><br />In 1971, Progress Report #8 is issued. The flowchart (pg. 61) will forever resolve the true laboratory birth origin of AIDS. Eventually the Special Virus program will issue 15 reports and over 20,000 scientific papers. The flowchart links every scientific paper, medical experiment and U.S. contract. The flowchart would remain “missing” until 1999. World scientists were stunned. The flowchart will gain in significance throughout the 21st Century. It is also clear the experiments conducted under Phase IV-A of the flowchart are our best route to better therapy and treatment for people living with HIV/AIDS. The first sixty pages of progress report #8 of the Special Virus program prove conclusively the specific goal of the program. By June 1977, the Special Virus program had produced 15, 000 gallons of AIDS. The AIDS virus was attached as complement to vaccines sent to Africa and Manhattan. However, because of the thoroughness of authors, like Dr. Robert E. Lee, we also learn the Stanford Mycoplasma Laboratory issues one of the first papers with AIDS in the title. “Viral Infections in Man Associated with Acquired Immunological Deficiency States.” The primary scientist, Dr. Thomas Merigan, was a “consultant” to the Special Virus program.<br /><br />Progress Report # 8 at 104 - 106 proves Dr. Robert Gallo was secretly working on the development of AIDS with full support of the sector of the U.S. government that seeks to kill its citizens. Dr. Gallo can not explain why he excluded his role as a “project officer” for the Special Virus program from his biographical book. Dr. Gallo’s early work and discoveries will finally be viewed in relation to the flowchart. We now know where every experiment fits into the flowchart. The “research logic” is irrefutable evidence of a federal “Manhattan-style project” to develop a “contagious” cancer that “selectively” kills. Dr. Gallo’s 1971 paper is identical to his 1984 AIDS announcement.<br /><br />Progress Report #8 at 273 - 286 proves we gave AIDS to monkeys. Since 1962, the United States and Dr. Robert Gallo have been inoculating monkeys and re-releasing them back into the wild. Thus, even government scientists are baffled that both HIV-1 and HIV-II would “suddenly emerge” from two distinct monkey ancestral relatives during the last 100 years. A 1999 Japanese study will ultimately prove the Man to Monkey origin of Monkey AIDS. The monkey experiments summary definitively proves Monkey AIDS is also man-made.<br /><br />In 1972, the United States and the Soviet Union entered into a biological agreement that would signal the death knell for the Black Population. The 1972 agreement for collaboration and cooperation in the development of offensive biological agents is still U. S. policy.<br /><br />In 1974, Furher Henry Kissinger releases his NSSM-200 (U.S. Plan to Address Overpopulation). It is the only issue of discussion at the World Population Conference in Bucharest, Romania. The men in the shadows had won, the whole world agrees to secretly cull Africa’s population. Today it is Africa and other undesirables. Tomorrow it may be you.<br /><br />In 1975, President Gerald Ford signs National Security Defense Memorandum #314. The United States implements the Kissinger NSSM-200.<br /><br />In 1976, the United States issues Progress Report #13 of the Special Virus program. The report proves the United States had various international agreements with the Russians, Germans, British, French, Canadians and Japanese. The plot to kill Black people has wide international support. In March, the Special Virus began production of the AIDS virus, by June 1977, the program will have produced 15,000 gallons of AIDS. President Jimmy Carter allows for the continuation of the secret plan to cull the Black Population.<br /><br />Suddenly, just as President Nixon had predicted, there was explosive death. On November 4, 1999, the U.S. White House announced,.... “Within a period as short as five years, all new infections of HIV in the United States will be African American....” At some point our experts must be allowed to begin the interface process of allowing the history of this virus program to count. It is ludicrous and preposterous to fail to review the U.S. virus program in which to elucidate the etiology of AIDS.<br /><br />More of the history of the secret virus program can be found in the archives of Dr. John B. Moloney. A review of the files under Dr. Moloney’s name would further pinpoint additional dates and records consistent with one of the greatest hunts, capture and proliferation of disease in the history of the human race. We have found the missing link. It is the guts of the research logic of a federal program that seeks to kill. We have found a curtain of AIDS. We can identify some of the people who work in the shadows of the curtain. Dr. Robert Gallo and Dr. Garth Nicolson must lead us in review. In light of the attack mechanisms available in which to inhibit AIDS, it is time that not another person be stricken with this relic, synthetic mycoplasma chimera.<br /><a href=\"http://historyofnations.org/genealogy/aids.html\" target=\"_blank\">http://historyofnations.org/genealogy/aids.html</a>",
"to": [
"https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public"
],
"cc": [
"https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/942830475402027026/followers"
],
"tag": [],
"url": "https://www.minds.com/newsfeed/973339831552733184",
"published": "2019-05-09T21:44:59+00:00",
"source": {
"content": "In 1957, future U.S. president, Rep Gerald Ford and others gave the U.S. Pentagon permission to aggressively deploy offensive biological agents. There are no recorded cases of AIDS prior to the 1957 creation of “Special Operation-X.” (The SOX) program served as the immediate prototype program for the Special Virus program to begin in 1962.\n\nIn 1961, scientist Haldor Thomar publishes that viruses cause cancer. In 1995, he and Carlton Gajdusek informed the National Academy of Sciences that “the study of visna in sheep would be the best test for candidate anti-HIV drugs.”\n\nIn 1962, under the cover of cancer research, the United States charts a path to commit premeditated murder, the “Special Virus” program begins on February 12th. Dr. Len Hayflick sets up a U.S. mycoplasma laboratory at Stanford University. Many believe the “Special Virus” program began in November 1961 with a Phizer contract.\n\nBeginning in 1963 and for every year thereafter, the “Special Virus” program conducted annual progress reviews at Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, PA. The annual meetings are representative of the aggressive nature in which the United States pursued the development of AIDS.\n\nIn 1964, the United States Congress gave full support for the leukemia/lymphoma (AIDS) virus research.\n\nIn 1967, the National Academy of Sciences launched a full scale assault on Africa. The CIA (Technical Services Division) acknowledged its secret inoculator program.\n\nIn 1969, Fort Detrick told world scientists and the Pentagon asked for more money, they knew they could make AIDS. Nixon’s July 18 secret memo to Congress on “Overpopulation” serves as the start of the paper trail of the AIDS Holocaust.\n\nIn 1970, President Nixon signed PL91-213 and John D. Rockefeller, III became the “Population Czar.” Nixon’s August 10 National Security Memo leaves no doubt as to the genocidal nature of depopulation.\n\nIn 1971, Progress Report #8 is issued. The flowchart (pg. 61) will forever resolve the true laboratory birth origin of AIDS. Eventually the Special Virus program will issue 15 reports and over 20,000 scientific papers. The flowchart links every scientific paper, medical experiment and U.S. contract. The flowchart would remain “missing” until 1999. World scientists were stunned. The flowchart will gain in significance throughout the 21st Century. It is also clear the experiments conducted under Phase IV-A of the flowchart are our best route to better therapy and treatment for people living with HIV/AIDS. The first sixty pages of progress report #8 of the Special Virus program prove conclusively the specific goal of the program. By June 1977, the Special Virus program had produced 15, 000 gallons of AIDS. The AIDS virus was attached as complement to vaccines sent to Africa and Manhattan. However, because of the thoroughness of authors, like Dr. Robert E. Lee, we also learn the Stanford Mycoplasma Laboratory issues one of the first papers with AIDS in the title. “Viral Infections in Man Associated with Acquired Immunological Deficiency States.” The primary scientist, Dr. Thomas Merigan, was a “consultant” to the Special Virus program.\n\nProgress Report # 8 at 104 - 106 proves Dr. Robert Gallo was secretly working on the development of AIDS with full support of the sector of the U.S. government that seeks to kill its citizens. Dr. Gallo can not explain why he excluded his role as a “project officer” for the Special Virus program from his biographical book. Dr. Gallo’s early work and discoveries will finally be viewed in relation to the flowchart. We now know where every experiment fits into the flowchart. The “research logic” is irrefutable evidence of a federal “Manhattan-style project” to develop a “contagious” cancer that “selectively” kills. Dr. Gallo’s 1971 paper is identical to his 1984 AIDS announcement.\n\nProgress Report #8 at 273 - 286 proves we gave AIDS to monkeys. Since 1962, the United States and Dr. Robert Gallo have been inoculating monkeys and re-releasing them back into the wild. Thus, even government scientists are baffled that both HIV-1 and HIV-II would “suddenly emerge” from two distinct monkey ancestral relatives during the last 100 years. A 1999 Japanese study will ultimately prove the Man to Monkey origin of Monkey AIDS. The monkey experiments summary definitively proves Monkey AIDS is also man-made.\n\nIn 1972, the United States and the Soviet Union entered into a biological agreement that would signal the death knell for the Black Population. The 1972 agreement for collaboration and cooperation in the development of offensive biological agents is still U. S. policy.\n\nIn 1974, Furher Henry Kissinger releases his NSSM-200 (U.S. Plan to Address Overpopulation). It is the only issue of discussion at the World Population Conference in Bucharest, Romania. The men in the shadows had won, the whole world agrees to secretly cull Africa’s population. Today it is Africa and other undesirables. Tomorrow it may be you.\n\nIn 1975, President Gerald Ford signs National Security Defense Memorandum #314. The United States implements the Kissinger NSSM-200.\n\nIn 1976, the United States issues Progress Report #13 of the Special Virus program. The report proves the United States had various international agreements with the Russians, Germans, British, French, Canadians and Japanese. The plot to kill Black people has wide international support. In March, the Special Virus began production of the AIDS virus, by June 1977, the program will have produced 15,000 gallons of AIDS. President Jimmy Carter allows for the continuation of the secret plan to cull the Black Population.\n\nSuddenly, just as President Nixon had predicted, there was explosive death. On November 4, 1999, the U.S. White House announced,.... “Within a period as short as five years, all new infections of HIV in the United States will be African American....” At some point our experts must be allowed to begin the interface process of allowing the history of this virus program to count. It is ludicrous and preposterous to fail to review the U.S. virus program in which to elucidate the etiology of AIDS.\n\nMore of the history of the secret virus program can be found in the archives of Dr. John B. Moloney. A review of the files under Dr. Moloney’s name would further pinpoint additional dates and records consistent with one of the greatest hunts, capture and proliferation of disease in the history of the human race. We have found the missing link. It is the guts of the research logic of a federal program that seeks to kill. We have found a curtain of AIDS. We can identify some of the people who work in the shadows of the curtain. Dr. Robert Gallo and Dr. Garth Nicolson must lead us in review. In light of the attack mechanisms available in which to inhibit AIDS, it is time that not another person be stricken with this relic, synthetic mycoplasma chimera.\nhttp://historyofnations.org/genealogy/aids.html",
"mediaType": "text/plain"
}
},
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/942830475402027026/entities/urn:activity:973339831552733184/activity"
},
{
"type": "Create",
"actor": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/942830475402027026",
"object": {
"type": "Note",
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/942830475402027026/entities/urn:activity:961830532723089408",
"attributedTo": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/942830475402027026",
"content": "Organ Donors are Alive when their Organs are Harvested<br /><br />Prior to 1968 a person was declared dead only after their breathing and heart stopped for a determinate period of time. <br />The current terminology \"Brain Death\" was unheard of. <br />When surgeons realized they had the capability of taking organs from one seemingly “close to death” person and implanting them into another person to keep the recipient alive longer, a \"Pandora’s Box\" was opened. <br /><br />In the beginning, through trial and error, they discovered it was not possible to perform this \"miraculous\" surgery with organs taken from someone truly dead, even if the donor was without circulation for merely a few minutes, because organ damage occurs within a very brief time after circulation stops. <br />To justify their experimental procedures it was necessary for them to come up with a solution which is how the term \"BrainDeath\" was contrived. <br /><br />Much is being done to get your organs. <br />For an organ to be suitable for transplantation it must be healthy and it must come from a living person.<br />Once DBD (Donation After Brain Death) or DCD (Donation After Cardiac Death) has been verified and permission extracted from distraught family members (in cases where relatives cannot be located the <a href=\"https://www.minds.com/search?f=top&t=all&q=government\" title=\"#government\" class=\"u-url hashtag\" target=\"_blank\">#government</a> often now makes the determination on our behalf) the \"organ donor\" undergoes hours, sometimes days, of torturous treatment utilized to protect and preserve the body-container of \"spare parts!\" <br />The \"organ donor\" is forced to endure the excruciating painful and ongoing chemical treatment in preparation for organ excising. <br /><br />Literally the \"donor\" is now an organ warehouse and used for the sole purpose of organ preservation until a compatible recipient can be located.<br />Donation after circulatory death (DCD) can be performed on neurologically intact donors who do not fulfill neurologic or brain death criteria before circulatory arrest. This commentary focuses on the most controversial donor-related issues anticipated from mandatory implementation of DCD for imminent or cardiac death in <a href=\"https://www.minds.com/search?f=top&t=all&q=hospitals\" title=\"#hospitals\" class=\"u-url hashtag\" target=\"_blank\">#hospitals</a> across the USA.<br /><br />The truth of the horrific treatment and DEATH OF THE \"DONOR\"<br />Organ removal is performed while the patient is given only a paralyzing agent but no anesthetic! <br />Multi-organ excision, on the average, takes three to four hours of operating during which time the heart is beating, the blood pressure is normal and respiration is occurring albeit the patient is on a ventilator. Each organ is cut out until finally the beating heart is stopped, a moment before removal.<br />It is well documented the heart rate and blood pressure go up when the incision is made. This is the very response the anesthesiologist often observes in everyday surgery when the anesthetic is insufficient. But, as stated below, organ donors are not anesthetized.<br /><br />There are growing numbers of protesters among nurses and anesthesiologists, who react strongly to the movements of the supposed \"corpse.\" These movements are sometimes so violent it makes it impossible to continue the taking of organs. Resulting from their personal experiences and attestations, many in the medical profession have removed themselves from this program altogether.<br /><br />New York hospitals are routinely 'harvesting' organs from patients before they're even dead, an explosive lawsuit is claiming.<br />The suit accuses transplant non-profit The New York Organ Donor Network of bullying doctors into declaring patients brain dead when they are still alive.<br /><br />Plaintiff, Patrick McMahon, 50, reckons one in five patients are showing signs of brain activity when surgeons declare them dead and start hacking out their body parts.<br />'They're playing God,' said McMahon, a former transplant coordinator who claims he was fired just four months into the role for speaking out about the practice.<br />He said that the donor network makes 'millions and millions' from selling the organs they obtain to hospitals and to insurance companies for transplants.<br />'Hearts, lungs, kidneys, joints, bones, skin grafts, intestines, valves, eyes -- it's all big money.' <br /><br />The Air Force Combat veteran and former nurse added that financially strained hospitals are easily influenced to declare a patient brain dead because they're keen to free up bed space. <br />The lawsuit, filed in Manhattan Supreme Court in 2012, cites a 19-year-old car crash victim who was still struggling to breathe and showing signs of brain activity when doctors gave the green light for his organs to be harvested.<br />Network officials including director Michael Goldstein allegedly bullied Nassau University Medical Center staff into declaring the teen dead, stating during a conference call: 'This kid is dead, you got that?'<br />But McMahon said he believed the 19-year-old could have recovered.<br /><br />The lawsuit cites three other examples of patients who were still clinging to life when doctors gave a 'note' - an official declaration by a hospital that a patient is brain dead, which, as well as consent from next of kin, is required before a transplant can take place.<br />The suit claims that a man was admitted to Kings County Hospital in Brooklyn, a month later, again showing brain activity.<br />It claims McMahon protested but was blown off by hospital and donor network staff, and the man was declared brain dead and his organs harvested.<br /><br />In November 2011, a woman admitted to Staten Island University Hospital after a drug overdose was declared brain dead and her organs were about to be harvested when McMahon noticed that she was being given 'a paralyzing anesthetic' because her body was still jerking.<br />'She was having brain function when they were cutting into her on the table,' McMahon told MailOnline. <br />'He had given her a paralyser and there's no reason to give someone who is dead a paralyser.'<br />He said he confronted the person who gave it to her and he was speechless. <br />'Finally he said he was told to do it because while they were cutting her chest open she was moving her chest around. <br />And a paralyzer only paralyses you, it does nothing for the pain,' he said.<br />McMahon added that surgeons 'took everything' with regards to body parts.<br />'They took her eyes, her joints. She was right there when I was having the conversation. They were inserting the plastic bones where the real ones had been.' <br /><br />According to the lawsuit, when McMahon probed further on the disturbing case another network employee told hospital staff he was 'an untrained troublemaker with a history of raising frivolous issues and questions.'<br />McMahon added that staff members who collect the most organs throughout the year qualify for a Christmas bonus.<br />'If counselors do well by getting a lot of organs they are given a bonus in December,' he said.<br />The veteran - who worked at the donor network between July and November - said there are about 30-40 staff who are out in the field, going to hospitals and trying to get signatures and donations.<br />Estimated U.S. Average Billed Charges Per Transplant: Heart $1,000,000 Double Lung: $800,000 Liver: $580,000 Kidney: $275,000<br /><br />More than 123,000 people are on waiting lists for organ transplants in the United States, 100,000 of whom are waiting for new kidneys. Yet the need for healthy organs far outpaces donations. Only 28,000 transplants were completed in the last year, according to the 2014 national data from the U.S. Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network.<br /><br />Because organ donors are often alive when their organs are harvested, the medical community should not require donors to be declared dead, but instead adopt more “honest” moral criteria that allow the harvesting of organs from “dying” or “severely injured” patients, with proper consent, three leading experts have argued.<br />This approach, they say, would avoid the “pseudo-objective” claim that a donor is “really dead,” which is often based upon purely ideological definitions of death designed to expand the organ donor pool, and would allow organ harvesters to be more honest with the public, as well as ensure that donors don’t feel pain during the harvesting process.<br /><br />The chilling comments were offered by Doctor Neil Lazar, director of the medical-surgical intensive care unit at Toronto General Hospital, Dr. Maxwell J. Smith of the University of Toronto, and David Rodriguez-Arias of Universidad del Pais Vasco in Spain, at a U.S. bioethics conference in October and published in a recent paper in the American Journal of Bioethics.<br />“Because there is a general assumption that dead individuals cannot be harmed, veneration of the dead-donor rule is dangerously misleading,” they write. <br />“Ultimately, what is important for the protection and respect of potential donors is not to have a death certificate signed, but rather to be certain they are beyond suffering and to guarantee that their autonomy is respected.”<br />Instead of the so-called Dead Donor Rule (DDR), the authors propose that donors should be “protected from harm” (i.e given anesthesia so that they cannot feel pain during the donation process), that informed consent should be obtained, and that society should be “fully informed of the inherently debatable nature of any criterion to declare death.”<br /><br />The doctors note that developing the criteria for so-called “brain death,” which is often used by doctors to declare death before organ donation, was an “ideological strategy” aimed at increasing the donor pool that has been found to be “empirically and theoretically flawed.” They also criticize the latest attempts to create new, even looser definitions of death, such as circulatory death, which they argue amount to simply “pretending” that the patient is dead in order to get his organs.<br /><br />Based on an interview in 2013 with Dr. Paul Byrne, 80-year-old neonatologist blowing the whistle on the dark side of hospitals, it became clear that the concept of \"brain death\" is a complete fabrication conjured up for the sole purpose of legitimizing the murder of living people in order to harvest their organs. <br />These people (who often end up in hospitals as a result of car accidents or drug overdoses or the like) are given paralysis drugs during organ removal -- BUT NO ANESTHESIA!!! <br />Medical staff are literally cleaving open the chests of these innocent people and tearing out their organs, one by one, leaving the heart for last, after which point they are, of course, dead.<br /><br />It's wakey wakey time people.This is no joke. <br />If you do not want to be tortured to death by medical sadists, SAY NO TO ORGAN DONATION! Evil is still evil by any other name.<br /><br />A special thanks to Sandra Tsai for making us aware of pending lawsuits & information.<br /><br />More News on: <a href=\"http://www.theillusionofscience.org/418692745\" target=\"_blank\">http://www.theillusionofscience.org/418692745</a><br /><br /><a href=\"http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17020597\" target=\"_blank\">http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17020597</a><br /><a href=\"http://www.srtr.org/annual_Reports/2011/113a_dh.aspx\" target=\"_blank\">http://www.srtr.org/annual_Reports/2011/113a_dh.aspx</a><br /><a href=\"http://www.cdc.gov/transplantsafety/outbreak-invest/index.html\" target=\"_blank\">http://www.cdc.gov/transplantsafety/outbreak-invest/index.html</a><br /><a href=\"http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23990679\" target=\"_blank\">http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23990679</a><br /><a href=\"http://www.everydayhealth.com/news/donating-kidney-may-carry-hidden-insurance-costs/\" target=\"_blank\">http://www.everydayhealth.com/news/donating-kidney-may-carry-hidden-insurance-costs/</a><br /><a href=\"http://www.srtr.org/csr/current/Centers/Default.aspx\" target=\"_blank\">http://www.srtr.org/csr/current/Centers/Default.aspx</a> freespeech health <a href=\"https://www.minds.com/search?f=top&t=all&q=lawsuit\" title=\"#lawsuit\" class=\"u-url hashtag\" target=\"_blank\">#lawsuit</a> <a href=\"https://www.minds.com/search?f=top&t=all&q=medical\" title=\"#medical\" class=\"u-url hashtag\" target=\"_blank\">#medical</a> <a href=\"https://www.minds.com/search?f=top&t=all&q=freespeech\" title=\"#freespeech\" class=\"u-url hashtag\" target=\"_blank\">#freespeech</a>",
"to": [
"https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public"
],
"cc": [
"https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/942830475402027026/followers"
],
"tag": [],
"url": "https://www.minds.com/newsfeed/961830532723089408",
"published": "2019-04-08T03:31:08+00:00",
"source": {
"content": "Organ Donors are Alive when their Organs are Harvested\n\nPrior to 1968 a person was declared dead only after their breathing and heart stopped for a determinate period of time. \nThe current terminology \"Brain Death\" was unheard of. \nWhen surgeons realized they had the capability of taking organs from one seemingly “close to death” person and implanting them into another person to keep the recipient alive longer, a \"Pandora’s Box\" was opened. \n\nIn the beginning, through trial and error, they discovered it was not possible to perform this \"miraculous\" surgery with organs taken from someone truly dead, even if the donor was without circulation for merely a few minutes, because organ damage occurs within a very brief time after circulation stops. \nTo justify their experimental procedures it was necessary for them to come up with a solution which is how the term \"BrainDeath\" was contrived. \n\nMuch is being done to get your organs. \nFor an organ to be suitable for transplantation it must be healthy and it must come from a living person.\nOnce DBD (Donation After Brain Death) or DCD (Donation After Cardiac Death) has been verified and permission extracted from distraught family members (in cases where relatives cannot be located the #government often now makes the determination on our behalf) the \"organ donor\" undergoes hours, sometimes days, of torturous treatment utilized to protect and preserve the body-container of \"spare parts!\" \nThe \"organ donor\" is forced to endure the excruciating painful and ongoing chemical treatment in preparation for organ excising. \n\nLiterally the \"donor\" is now an organ warehouse and used for the sole purpose of organ preservation until a compatible recipient can be located.\nDonation after circulatory death (DCD) can be performed on neurologically intact donors who do not fulfill neurologic or brain death criteria before circulatory arrest. This commentary focuses on the most controversial donor-related issues anticipated from mandatory implementation of DCD for imminent or cardiac death in #hospitals across the USA.\n\nThe truth of the horrific treatment and DEATH OF THE \"DONOR\"\nOrgan removal is performed while the patient is given only a paralyzing agent but no anesthetic! \nMulti-organ excision, on the average, takes three to four hours of operating during which time the heart is beating, the blood pressure is normal and respiration is occurring albeit the patient is on a ventilator. Each organ is cut out until finally the beating heart is stopped, a moment before removal.\nIt is well documented the heart rate and blood pressure go up when the incision is made. This is the very response the anesthesiologist often observes in everyday surgery when the anesthetic is insufficient. But, as stated below, organ donors are not anesthetized.\n\nThere are growing numbers of protesters among nurses and anesthesiologists, who react strongly to the movements of the supposed \"corpse.\" These movements are sometimes so violent it makes it impossible to continue the taking of organs. Resulting from their personal experiences and attestations, many in the medical profession have removed themselves from this program altogether.\n\nNew York hospitals are routinely 'harvesting' organs from patients before they're even dead, an explosive lawsuit is claiming.\nThe suit accuses transplant non-profit The New York Organ Donor Network of bullying doctors into declaring patients brain dead when they are still alive.\n\nPlaintiff, Patrick McMahon, 50, reckons one in five patients are showing signs of brain activity when surgeons declare them dead and start hacking out their body parts.\n'They're playing God,' said McMahon, a former transplant coordinator who claims he was fired just four months into the role for speaking out about the practice.\nHe said that the donor network makes 'millions and millions' from selling the organs they obtain to hospitals and to insurance companies for transplants.\n'Hearts, lungs, kidneys, joints, bones, skin grafts, intestines, valves, eyes -- it's all big money.' \n\nThe Air Force Combat veteran and former nurse added that financially strained hospitals are easily influenced to declare a patient brain dead because they're keen to free up bed space. \nThe lawsuit, filed in Manhattan Supreme Court in 2012, cites a 19-year-old car crash victim who was still struggling to breathe and showing signs of brain activity when doctors gave the green light for his organs to be harvested.\nNetwork officials including director Michael Goldstein allegedly bullied Nassau University Medical Center staff into declaring the teen dead, stating during a conference call: 'This kid is dead, you got that?'\nBut McMahon said he believed the 19-year-old could have recovered.\n\nThe lawsuit cites three other examples of patients who were still clinging to life when doctors gave a 'note' - an official declaration by a hospital that a patient is brain dead, which, as well as consent from next of kin, is required before a transplant can take place.\nThe suit claims that a man was admitted to Kings County Hospital in Brooklyn, a month later, again showing brain activity.\nIt claims McMahon protested but was blown off by hospital and donor network staff, and the man was declared brain dead and his organs harvested.\n\nIn November 2011, a woman admitted to Staten Island University Hospital after a drug overdose was declared brain dead and her organs were about to be harvested when McMahon noticed that she was being given 'a paralyzing anesthetic' because her body was still jerking.\n'She was having brain function when they were cutting into her on the table,' McMahon told MailOnline. \n'He had given her a paralyser and there's no reason to give someone who is dead a paralyser.'\nHe said he confronted the person who gave it to her and he was speechless. \n'Finally he said he was told to do it because while they were cutting her chest open she was moving her chest around. \nAnd a paralyzer only paralyses you, it does nothing for the pain,' he said.\nMcMahon added that surgeons 'took everything' with regards to body parts.\n'They took her eyes, her joints. She was right there when I was having the conversation. They were inserting the plastic bones where the real ones had been.' \n\nAccording to the lawsuit, when McMahon probed further on the disturbing case another network employee told hospital staff he was 'an untrained troublemaker with a history of raising frivolous issues and questions.'\nMcMahon added that staff members who collect the most organs throughout the year qualify for a Christmas bonus.\n'If counselors do well by getting a lot of organs they are given a bonus in December,' he said.\nThe veteran - who worked at the donor network between July and November - said there are about 30-40 staff who are out in the field, going to hospitals and trying to get signatures and donations.\nEstimated U.S. Average Billed Charges Per Transplant: Heart $1,000,000 Double Lung: $800,000 Liver: $580,000 Kidney: $275,000\n\nMore than 123,000 people are on waiting lists for organ transplants in the United States, 100,000 of whom are waiting for new kidneys. Yet the need for healthy organs far outpaces donations. Only 28,000 transplants were completed in the last year, according to the 2014 national data from the U.S. Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network.\n\nBecause organ donors are often alive when their organs are harvested, the medical community should not require donors to be declared dead, but instead adopt more “honest” moral criteria that allow the harvesting of organs from “dying” or “severely injured” patients, with proper consent, three leading experts have argued.\nThis approach, they say, would avoid the “pseudo-objective” claim that a donor is “really dead,” which is often based upon purely ideological definitions of death designed to expand the organ donor pool, and would allow organ harvesters to be more honest with the public, as well as ensure that donors don’t feel pain during the harvesting process.\n\nThe chilling comments were offered by Doctor Neil Lazar, director of the medical-surgical intensive care unit at Toronto General Hospital, Dr. Maxwell J. Smith of the University of Toronto, and David Rodriguez-Arias of Universidad del Pais Vasco in Spain, at a U.S. bioethics conference in October and published in a recent paper in the American Journal of Bioethics.\n“Because there is a general assumption that dead individuals cannot be harmed, veneration of the dead-donor rule is dangerously misleading,” they write. \n“Ultimately, what is important for the protection and respect of potential donors is not to have a death certificate signed, but rather to be certain they are beyond suffering and to guarantee that their autonomy is respected.”\nInstead of the so-called Dead Donor Rule (DDR), the authors propose that donors should be “protected from harm” (i.e given anesthesia so that they cannot feel pain during the donation process), that informed consent should be obtained, and that society should be “fully informed of the inherently debatable nature of any criterion to declare death.”\n\nThe doctors note that developing the criteria for so-called “brain death,” which is often used by doctors to declare death before organ donation, was an “ideological strategy” aimed at increasing the donor pool that has been found to be “empirically and theoretically flawed.” They also criticize the latest attempts to create new, even looser definitions of death, such as circulatory death, which they argue amount to simply “pretending” that the patient is dead in order to get his organs.\n\nBased on an interview in 2013 with Dr. Paul Byrne, 80-year-old neonatologist blowing the whistle on the dark side of hospitals, it became clear that the concept of \"brain death\" is a complete fabrication conjured up for the sole purpose of legitimizing the murder of living people in order to harvest their organs. \nThese people (who often end up in hospitals as a result of car accidents or drug overdoses or the like) are given paralysis drugs during organ removal -- BUT NO ANESTHESIA!!! \nMedical staff are literally cleaving open the chests of these innocent people and tearing out their organs, one by one, leaving the heart for last, after which point they are, of course, dead.\n\nIt's wakey wakey time people.This is no joke. \nIf you do not want to be tortured to death by medical sadists, SAY NO TO ORGAN DONATION! Evil is still evil by any other name.\n\nA special thanks to Sandra Tsai for making us aware of pending lawsuits & information.\n\nMore News on: http://www.theillusionofscience.org/418692745\n\nhttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17020597\nhttp://www.srtr.org/annual_Reports/2011/113a_dh.aspx\nhttp://www.cdc.gov/transplantsafety/outbreak-invest/index.html\nhttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23990679\nhttp://www.everydayhealth.com/news/donating-kidney-may-carry-hidden-insurance-costs/\nhttp://www.srtr.org/csr/current/Centers/Default.aspx freespeech health #lawsuit #medical #freespeech",
"mediaType": "text/plain"
}
},
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/942830475402027026/entities/urn:activity:961830532723089408/activity"
},
{
"type": "Create",
"actor": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/942830475402027026",
"object": {
"type": "Note",
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/942830475402027026/entities/urn:activity:957762580645543936",
"attributedTo": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/942830475402027026",
"content": "Incase folks aren’t paying attention ",
"to": [
"https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public"
],
"cc": [
"https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/942830475402027026/followers"
],
"tag": [],
"url": "https://www.minds.com/newsfeed/957762580645543936",
"published": "2019-03-27T22:06:33+00:00",
"source": {
"content": "Incase folks aren’t paying attention ",
"mediaType": "text/plain"
}
},
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/942830475402027026/entities/urn:activity:957762580645543936/activity"
},
{
"type": "Create",
"actor": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/942830475402027026",
"object": {
"type": "Note",
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/942830475402027026/entities/urn:activity:956620998991233024",
"attributedTo": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/942830475402027026",
"content": "For all my research junkies this is for you!! <br />Fact checkers, truth seekers, readers, everyone<br /><br />Click the links below and read your hearts out ⤵️<br /><br /><br /><a href=\"https://vaccine.guide/\" target=\"_blank\">https://vaccine.guide/</a><br /><br /><br /><a href=\"https://mega.nz/#F!OoonRbBL!piJ4SeiMofpRal178tNEmA\" target=\"_blank\">https://mega.nz/#F!OoonRbBL!piJ4SeiMofpRal178tNEmA</a>",
"to": [
"https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public"
],
"cc": [
"https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/942830475402027026/followers"
],
"tag": [],
"url": "https://www.minds.com/newsfeed/956620998991233024",
"published": "2019-03-24T18:30:19+00:00",
"source": {
"content": "For all my research junkies this is for you!! \nFact checkers, truth seekers, readers, everyone\n\nClick the links below and read your hearts out ⤵️\n\n\nhttps://vaccine.guide/\n\n\nhttps://mega.nz/#F!OoonRbBL!piJ4SeiMofpRal178tNEmA",
"mediaType": "text/plain"
}
},
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/942830475402027026/entities/urn:activity:956620998991233024/activity"
},
{
"type": "Create",
"actor": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/942830475402027026",
"object": {
"type": "Note",
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/942830475402027026/entities/urn:activity:956619879191527424",
"attributedTo": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/942830475402027026",
"content": "Doctors ARE TRAINED IN Coercion <br /><br /><br />Great breakdown. <br />\"This strategy has four parts to it:<br /><br /> Cognitive Ease<br /> Natural Assumption<br /> Identity Strategy<br /> Advantageous Terms<br /><br />“Cognitive Ease” means, don’t engage the parent’s brain or ask them to think through their decision. In fact, specifically avoid making them think critically, because they’re more likely to just agree if they aren’t really thinking.<br /><br />“Natural assumption” means stating that the child will be getting vaccines. For example, “It’s time for little Timmy’s vaccines today, so I’ll go ahead and order them.” Don’t ask the parent if they want them, don’t leave room for disagreements, just make assumptions.<br /><br />“Identity strategy” means try to tell the parents that they clearly want to be part of a group called ‘good parents,’ and that good parents protect their children via vaccination. (This is why the pro-vaccine effort in my area is called “Project Love.”) This is an incredibly important part of their strategy; they want you to feel belonging to this group of ‘good parents who vaccinate.’<br /><br />“Advantageous terms” means that they will repeat key phrases like “protect your baby” to manipulate you and make it seem most beneficial to vaccinate.<br /><br />In addition to these four points, they also recommend an “emotional appeal” where you tell scary stories about babies who get very sick or die from diseases. <br /><br /><br /><a href=\"https://modernalternativemama.com/2019/03/16/a-script-for-dealing-with-doctors-that-coerce-you-to-vaccinate/?fbclid=IwAR0Y4EkcbMrQP0z7F_lDx47dF7l85iAHLZySdnOXrg3TonDHTdvAJ7Ui00o\" target=\"_blank\">https://modernalternativemama.com/2019/03/16/a-script-for-dealing-with-doctors-that-coerce-you-to-vaccinate/?fbclid=IwAR0Y4EkcbMrQP0z7F_lDx47dF7l85iAHLZySdnOXrg3TonDHTdvAJ7Ui00o</a><br /><br /><br /><br /><a href=\"http://wcaap.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/08/Best-practice-guidance-respond-vocal-vaccine-deniers-public1.pdf\" target=\"_blank\">http://wcaap.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/08/Best-practice-guidance-respond-vocal-vaccine-deniers-public1.pdf</a> <a href=\"https://www.minds.com/search?f=top&t=all&q=freespeech\" title=\"#freespeech\" class=\"u-url hashtag\" target=\"_blank\">#freespeech</a> <a href=\"https://www.minds.com/search?f=top&t=all&q=health\" title=\"#health\" class=\"u-url hashtag\" target=\"_blank\">#health</a> <a href=\"https://www.minds.com/search?f=top&t=all&q=politics\" title=\"#politics\" class=\"u-url hashtag\" target=\"_blank\">#politics</a> <a href=\"https://www.minds.com/search?f=top&t=all&q=journalism\" title=\"#journalism\" class=\"u-url hashtag\" target=\"_blank\">#journalism</a> <a href=\"https://www.minds.com/search?f=top&t=all&q=minds\" title=\"#minds\" class=\"u-url hashtag\" target=\"_blank\">#minds</a>",
"to": [
"https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public"
],
"cc": [
"https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/942830475402027026/followers"
],
"tag": [],
"url": "https://www.minds.com/newsfeed/956619879191527424",
"published": "2019-03-24T18:25:52+00:00",
"source": {
"content": "Doctors ARE TRAINED IN Coercion \n\n\nGreat breakdown. \n\"This strategy has four parts to it:\n\n Cognitive Ease\n Natural Assumption\n Identity Strategy\n Advantageous Terms\n\n“Cognitive Ease” means, don’t engage the parent’s brain or ask them to think through their decision. In fact, specifically avoid making them think critically, because they’re more likely to just agree if they aren’t really thinking.\n\n“Natural assumption” means stating that the child will be getting vaccines. For example, “It’s time for little Timmy’s vaccines today, so I’ll go ahead and order them.” Don’t ask the parent if they want them, don’t leave room for disagreements, just make assumptions.\n\n“Identity strategy” means try to tell the parents that they clearly want to be part of a group called ‘good parents,’ and that good parents protect their children via vaccination. (This is why the pro-vaccine effort in my area is called “Project Love.”) This is an incredibly important part of their strategy; they want you to feel belonging to this group of ‘good parents who vaccinate.’\n\n“Advantageous terms” means that they will repeat key phrases like “protect your baby” to manipulate you and make it seem most beneficial to vaccinate.\n\nIn addition to these four points, they also recommend an “emotional appeal” where you tell scary stories about babies who get very sick or die from diseases. \n\n\nhttps://modernalternativemama.com/2019/03/16/a-script-for-dealing-with-doctors-that-coerce-you-to-vaccinate/?fbclid=IwAR0Y4EkcbMrQP0z7F_lDx47dF7l85iAHLZySdnOXrg3TonDHTdvAJ7Ui00o\n\n\n\nhttp://wcaap.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/08/Best-practice-guidance-respond-vocal-vaccine-deniers-public1.pdf #freespeech #health #politics #journalism #minds",
"mediaType": "text/plain"
}
},
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/942830475402027026/entities/urn:activity:956619879191527424/activity"
},
{
"type": "Create",
"actor": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/942830475402027026",
"object": {
"type": "Note",
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/942830475402027026/entities/urn:activity:956615092718948352",
"attributedTo": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/942830475402027026",
"content": "<br />Do you ever read the ingredients are in your food?<br />🤔<br /><br /><a href=\"https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Asparaginase\" target=\"_blank\">https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Asparaginase</a><br /><br />This post is for all those that think a bag of chips once in awhile is not that bad....<br /><br />“Why is CHEMO in your Potato Chips?!?!?<br /><br />What is Asparaginase?<br /><br />Asparaginase is a chemotherapy drug used to treat acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL).<br /><br />One form of asparaginase is made from a type of bacteria called escherichia coli (Yes the same E COLI THAT IS BAD FOR YOU). Another form of asparaginase is made from Erwinia chrysanthemi bacteria. <br /><br />The mechanism of action? Blocking Amino Acids! <br /><br />Because as I've detailed extensively in multiple videos that PROTEIN NOT \"SUGAR\" is what Cancer feeds on! <br /><br />MAN DOES THE GOVERNMENT EVER CARE ABOUT YOU! THEY MUST BE TRYING TO PROTECT YOU FROM CANCER RIGHT!?!?!?<br /><br />Everyone in the know is aware that Chemo causes Cancer to grow 100X faster!<br /><br />SIDE EFFECTS<br /><br />The following serious adverse reactions occur with Asparaginase treatment [see WARNINGS AND PRECAUTIONS]:<br /><br />Anaphylaxis and serious allergic reactions<br />Serious thrombosis in some cases fulminant or fatal<br />Pancreatitis<br />Glucose intolerance in some cases irreversible<br />Coagulopathy<br />Hepatotoxicity and abnormal liver function in some cases fatal, can occur.<br />Central Nervous System effects including coma, seizures, and hallucinations.<br />Posterior Reversible Encephalopathy Syndrome (PRES)<br />Risk of Medication Errors<br /><br />The most common adverse reactions with Elspar are allergic reactions (including anaphylaxis), hyperglycemia, pancreatitis, central nervous system (CNS) thrombosis, coagulopathy, hyperbilirubinemia, and elevated transaminases”. ~Terry Tillaart <br /><br />Shared by Mariah Mazza 🍇 Heal Thy Self Healthy Self...<br />Christine McDonald ~ Healthy Habits",
"to": [
"https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public"
],
"cc": [
"https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/942830475402027026/followers"
],
"tag": [],
"url": "https://www.minds.com/newsfeed/956615092718948352",
"published": "2019-03-24T18:06:51+00:00",
"source": {
"content": "\nDo you ever read the ingredients are in your food?\n🤔\n\nhttps://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Asparaginase\n\nThis post is for all those that think a bag of chips once in awhile is not that bad....\n\n“Why is CHEMO in your Potato Chips?!?!?\n\nWhat is Asparaginase?\n\nAsparaginase is a chemotherapy drug used to treat acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL).\n\nOne form of asparaginase is made from a type of bacteria called escherichia coli (Yes the same E COLI THAT IS BAD FOR YOU). Another form of asparaginase is made from Erwinia chrysanthemi bacteria. \n\nThe mechanism of action? Blocking Amino Acids! \n\nBecause as I've detailed extensively in multiple videos that PROTEIN NOT \"SUGAR\" is what Cancer feeds on! \n\nMAN DOES THE GOVERNMENT EVER CARE ABOUT YOU! THEY MUST BE TRYING TO PROTECT YOU FROM CANCER RIGHT!?!?!?\n\nEveryone in the know is aware that Chemo causes Cancer to grow 100X faster!\n\nSIDE EFFECTS\n\nThe following serious adverse reactions occur with Asparaginase treatment [see WARNINGS AND PRECAUTIONS]:\n\nAnaphylaxis and serious allergic reactions\nSerious thrombosis in some cases fulminant or fatal\nPancreatitis\nGlucose intolerance in some cases irreversible\nCoagulopathy\nHepatotoxicity and abnormal liver function in some cases fatal, can occur.\nCentral Nervous System effects including coma, seizures, and hallucinations.\nPosterior Reversible Encephalopathy Syndrome (PRES)\nRisk of Medication Errors\n\nThe most common adverse reactions with Elspar are allergic reactions (including anaphylaxis), hyperglycemia, pancreatitis, central nervous system (CNS) thrombosis, coagulopathy, hyperbilirubinemia, and elevated transaminases”. ~Terry Tillaart \n\nShared by Mariah Mazza 🍇 Heal Thy Self Healthy Self...\nChristine McDonald ~ Healthy Habits",
"mediaType": "text/plain"
}
},
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/942830475402027026/entities/urn:activity:956615092718948352/activity"
},
{
"type": "Create",
"actor": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/942830475402027026",
"object": {
"type": "Note",
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/942830475402027026/entities/urn:activity:954838043883950080",
"attributedTo": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/942830475402027026",
"content": "<a href=\"https://www.minds.com/newsfeed/954838043883950080\" target=\"_blank\">https://www.minds.com/newsfeed/954838043883950080</a>",
"to": [
"https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public"
],
"cc": [
"https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/942830475402027026/followers"
],
"tag": [],
"url": "https://www.minds.com/newsfeed/954838043883950080",
"published": "2019-03-19T20:25:29+00:00",
"source": {
"content": "https://www.minds.com/newsfeed/954838043883950080",
"mediaType": "text/plain"
}
},
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/942830475402027026/entities/urn:activity:954838043883950080/activity"
},
{
"type": "Create",
"actor": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/942830475402027026",
"object": {
"type": "Note",
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/942830475402027026/entities/urn:activity:954763452192088064",
"attributedTo": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/942830475402027026",
"content": "During the 30 years before DDT was banned in the U.S. in 1972, a total of approximately 1.35 billion pounds of the chemical was sprayed throughout the country.........<br /><br />based on a false theory that mosquitoes carried a germ that spread polio, and under the false assumption that DDT was completely harmless to humans—so much so that one of the popular advertising slogans of the 1940s and 1950s was, “DDT Is Good For Me-e-e!”<br /><br />Polio and DDT<br />http\\://www.whale.to/vaccine/polio_ddt_h.html<br /><br /><a href=\"https://envisioningtheamericandream.com/2014/04/01/decorating-with-ddt/\" target=\"_blank\">https://envisioningtheamericandream.com/2014/04/01/decorating-with-ddt/</a><br /><br /><br />History shows polio caused by pesticide exposure, then was eradicated by decline in DDT use<br /><br />Learn more: <a href=\"https://www.naturalnews.com/036290_polio_DDT_pesticide_exposure.html#ixzz4Yp9Ei4Kp\" target=\"_blank\">https://www.naturalnews.com/036290_polio_DDT_pesticide_exposure.html#ixzz4Yp9Ei4Kp</a><br /><br /><br /><a href=\"https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=MMSEnIVFBQ0\" target=\"_blank\">https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=MMSEnIVFBQ0</a><br /><br /><br />Decorating With DDT <br /><br /><a href=\"https://envisioningtheamericandream.com/2014/04/01/decorating-with-ddt/\" target=\"_blank\">https://envisioningtheamericandream.com/2014/04/01/decorating-with-ddt/</a><br /><br /><br /><br /><a href=\"https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=-UiCSvQvVys\" target=\"_blank\">https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=-UiCSvQvVys</a><br /><br /><br /><br /><a href=\"http://www.greenmedinfo.com/blog/everything-you-learned-about-cause-polio-wrong\" target=\"_blank\">http://www.greenmedinfo.com/blog/everything-you-learned-about-cause-polio-wrong</a><br /><br /><br /><a href=\"http://www.slideshare.net/safehealer/the-unknown-facts-of-polio\" target=\"_blank\">http://www.slideshare.net/safehealer/the-unknown-facts-of-polio</a><br /><br /><br />Spraying DDT for Polio in Texas 1946 Universal Newsreel <a href=\"https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Uno_Bl60i40\" target=\"_blank\">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Uno_Bl60i40</a><br /><br /><br />In 1945, A Truck Spraying Ddt (Dichloro- Diphenol- Trichlorethane) On Jones Beach, Long Island (New York) The People On The Beach Do Not Seem Worried. They trust government. <br /><br />Jan 01, 1945<br /><br /><br />U.S. Govenment Spraying DDT Insecticide on Children1947<br /><a href=\"https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kbcHszMCIJM\" target=\"_blank\">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kbcHszMCIJM</a><br /><br /><br />DDT and the Rise and Fall of Polio <br /><br /><a href=\"http://www.thevaccinereaction.org/2015/07/ddt-and-the-rise-and-fall-of-polio/\" target=\"_blank\">http://www.thevaccinereaction.org/2015/07/ddt-and-the-rise-and-fall-of-polio/</a><br /> <br /><br /><br />",
"to": [
"https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public"
],
"cc": [
"https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/942830475402027026/followers"
],
"tag": [],
"url": "https://www.minds.com/newsfeed/954763452192088064",
"published": "2019-03-19T15:29:05+00:00",
"source": {
"content": "During the 30 years before DDT was banned in the U.S. in 1972, a total of approximately 1.35 billion pounds of the chemical was sprayed throughout the country.........\n\nbased on a false theory that mosquitoes carried a germ that spread polio, and under the false assumption that DDT was completely harmless to humans—so much so that one of the popular advertising slogans of the 1940s and 1950s was, “DDT Is Good For Me-e-e!”\n\nPolio and DDT\nhttp\\://www.whale.to/vaccine/polio_ddt_h.html\n\nhttps://envisioningtheamericandream.com/2014/04/01/decorating-with-ddt/\n\n\nHistory shows polio caused by pesticide exposure, then was eradicated by decline in DDT use\n\nLearn more: https://www.naturalnews.com/036290_polio_DDT_pesticide_exposure.html#ixzz4Yp9Ei4Kp\n\n\nhttps://m.youtube.com/watch?v=MMSEnIVFBQ0\n\n\nDecorating With DDT \n\nhttps://envisioningtheamericandream.com/2014/04/01/decorating-with-ddt/\n\n\n\nhttps://m.youtube.com/watch?v=-UiCSvQvVys\n\n\n\nhttp://www.greenmedinfo.com/blog/everything-you-learned-about-cause-polio-wrong\n\n\nhttp://www.slideshare.net/safehealer/the-unknown-facts-of-polio\n\n\nSpraying DDT for Polio in Texas 1946 Universal Newsreel https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Uno_Bl60i40\n\n\nIn 1945, A Truck Spraying Ddt (Dichloro- Diphenol- Trichlorethane) On Jones Beach, Long Island (New York) The People On The Beach Do Not Seem Worried. They trust government. \n\nJan 01, 1945\n\n\nU.S. Govenment Spraying DDT Insecticide on Children1947\nhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kbcHszMCIJM\n\n\nDDT and the Rise and Fall of Polio \n\nhttp://www.thevaccinereaction.org/2015/07/ddt-and-the-rise-and-fall-of-polio/\n \n\n\n",
"mediaType": "text/plain"
}
},
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/942830475402027026/entities/urn:activity:954763452192088064/activity"
}
],
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/942830475402027026/outbox",
"partOf": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/942830475402027026/outboxoutbox"
}