A small tool to view real-world ActivityPub objects as JSON! Enter a URL
or username from Mastodon or a similar service below, and we'll send a
request with
the right
Accept
header
to the server to view the underlying object.
{
"@context": "https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams",
"type": "OrderedCollectionPage",
"orderedItems": [
{
"type": "Create",
"actor": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/892963254475694092",
"object": {
"type": "Note",
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/892963254475694092/entities/urn:activity:1746445132837691392",
"attributedTo": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/892963254475694092",
"content": "I like this guy's stuff. Greg's Airplanes and Automobiles. I wonder if he's on a different platform, yet. <br /><br />I'm confused, though. When did the P-51 start getting pushed as \"muh first escort fighter evar?\" I remember the History Channel hyping it up, back in the day, and I found it pretty cool until I learned about the P-38. <br /><br />Also, I apologize for the lack of output. I'm working on rectifying that, despite circumstances getting worse, making drawing harder to focus on. <br /><br /><a href=\"https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LFI8frj1NbM\" target=\"_blank\">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LFI8frj1NbM</a> ",
"to": [
"https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public"
],
"cc": [
"https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/892963254475694092/followers"
],
"tag": [],
"url": "https://www.minds.com/newsfeed/1746445132837691392",
"published": "2025-03-12T06:29:27+00:00",
"source": {
"content": "I like this guy's stuff. Greg's Airplanes and Automobiles. I wonder if he's on a different platform, yet. \n\nI'm confused, though. When did the P-51 start getting pushed as \"muh first escort fighter evar?\" I remember the History Channel hyping it up, back in the day, and I found it pretty cool until I learned about the P-38. \n\nAlso, I apologize for the lack of output. I'm working on rectifying that, despite circumstances getting worse, making drawing harder to focus on. \n\nhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LFI8frj1NbM ",
"mediaType": "text/plain"
}
},
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/892963254475694092/entities/urn:activity:1746445132837691392/activity"
},
{
"type": "Create",
"actor": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/892963254475694092",
"object": {
"type": "Note",
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/892963254475694092/entities/urn:activity:1603686645398245388",
"attributedTo": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/892963254475694092",
"content": "Well, this is vexing. I fear I've largely wasted the past year or so with my current WIP. Well, I didn't exactly get to work on it as much as I would have liked--it's just that I started when I did, and my less-than-ideal circumstances contrived to make things take this long to even get to this point. <br /><br />On the other hand, the WIP may not be a complete waste, as it could still serve as something of a design reference for another piece I had in mind. Provided that I don't botch that one, too.<br /><br />I'm also reconsidering the priorities of my projects, and I think I'm going to try to bang out a few more Battletech fan fart (I dare not call them \"art\") pieces before I shift my attention to what I've wanted to do (less fan fart, more studies). Hopefully, this shuffling of priorities will allow me to improve faster and to increase my output. <br /><br />What a crazy year, so far. Yet, it's only going to get crazier. Something, something, year of the dragon. ",
"to": [
"https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public"
],
"cc": [
"https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/892963254475694092/followers"
],
"tag": [],
"url": "https://www.minds.com/newsfeed/1603686645398245388",
"published": "2024-02-12T07:58:10+00:00",
"source": {
"content": "Well, this is vexing. I fear I've largely wasted the past year or so with my current WIP. Well, I didn't exactly get to work on it as much as I would have liked--it's just that I started when I did, and my less-than-ideal circumstances contrived to make things take this long to even get to this point. \n\nOn the other hand, the WIP may not be a complete waste, as it could still serve as something of a design reference for another piece I had in mind. Provided that I don't botch that one, too.\n\nI'm also reconsidering the priorities of my projects, and I think I'm going to try to bang out a few more Battletech fan fart (I dare not call them \"art\") pieces before I shift my attention to what I've wanted to do (less fan fart, more studies). Hopefully, this shuffling of priorities will allow me to improve faster and to increase my output. \n\nWhat a crazy year, so far. Yet, it's only going to get crazier. Something, something, year of the dragon. ",
"mediaType": "text/plain"
}
},
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/892963254475694092/entities/urn:activity:1603686645398245388/activity"
},
{
"type": "Create",
"actor": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/892963254475694092",
"object": {
"type": "Note",
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/892963254475694092/entities/urn:activity:1586409886470639624",
"attributedTo": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/892963254475694092",
"content": "<a href=\"https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b9RgoM1dar0\" target=\"_blank\">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b9RgoM1dar0</a><br /><br />Ooh. <br /><br />Wow, the preceding MBT-70 sounds like it would have been a total nightmare for manufacturing, maintenance, and logistics. Typical Kraut over-engineering. :P<br /><br />Not affiliated with Spookston, but I appreciate his works, like this one. Sure wish he'd branch out to alternative platforms like Rumble, but eh. ",
"to": [
"https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public"
],
"cc": [
"https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/892963254475694092/followers"
],
"tag": [],
"url": "https://www.minds.com/newsfeed/1586409886470639624",
"published": "2023-12-26T15:46:30+00:00",
"source": {
"content": "https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b9RgoM1dar0\n\nOoh. \n\nWow, the preceding MBT-70 sounds like it would have been a total nightmare for manufacturing, maintenance, and logistics. Typical Kraut over-engineering. :P\n\nNot affiliated with Spookston, but I appreciate his works, like this one. Sure wish he'd branch out to alternative platforms like Rumble, but eh. ",
"mediaType": "text/plain"
}
},
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/892963254475694092/entities/urn:activity:1586409886470639624/activity"
},
{
"type": "Create",
"actor": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/892963254475694092",
"object": {
"type": "Note",
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/892963254475694092/entities/urn:activity:1586095738109038603",
"attributedTo": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/892963254475694092",
"content": "Oh, whoops. I apologize for the lack of content over the past several months. Multiple circumstances have combined to impede my efforts to increase my productivity, including chronic lack of sleep (which really screws with one's ability to focus, among other things). I've started too many projects, and I need to finish them. <br /><br />I just want to wish everyone Happy Holidays. Next year and the year after that look...dicey. In the coming year, I hope to rectify my sleep issues and increase my productivity. ",
"to": [
"https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public"
],
"cc": [
"https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/892963254475694092/followers"
],
"tag": [],
"url": "https://www.minds.com/newsfeed/1586095738109038603",
"published": "2023-12-25T18:58:11+00:00",
"source": {
"content": "Oh, whoops. I apologize for the lack of content over the past several months. Multiple circumstances have combined to impede my efforts to increase my productivity, including chronic lack of sleep (which really screws with one's ability to focus, among other things). I've started too many projects, and I need to finish them. \n\nI just want to wish everyone Happy Holidays. Next year and the year after that look...dicey. In the coming year, I hope to rectify my sleep issues and increase my productivity. ",
"mediaType": "text/plain"
}
},
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/892963254475694092/entities/urn:activity:1586095738109038603/activity"
},
{
"type": "Create",
"actor": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/892963254475694092",
"object": {
"type": "Note",
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/892963254475694092/entities/urn:activity:1529553198459654158",
"attributedTo": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/892963254475694092",
"content": "<a href=\"https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iFs6LG0TEyU\" target=\"_blank\">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iFs6LG0TEyU</a><br /><br />Interesting. I'm not affiliated with The Chieftain, but I do appreciate and enjoy his content. <br /><br />Increased automation, eh? It sounds like the Army is behind the Navy on this one. I'd heard, recently, that the Navy found that increased automation had decreased the overall survivability of their ships. When you stop and think--really think--about the realities of warfare, you'll realize why they came to the conclusion they did. <br /><br />First, consider the following: even at the best of times, automated systems tend to be very finicky. What do you suppose happens when those systems get damaged in combat? Remember, war is the absolute worst place for equipment; it's actual destruction of men and materiel, no matter how the warhawks try to sanitize and justify it in the lamestream media. War machines are complicated things. The more complex any given piece of hardware is, the more points of possible failure. In accordance with Murphy's Laws of Combat, those automated systems will fail at the worst possible time. Maybe even to the active detriment of the crew, or any nearby friendly elements.<br /><br />For instance, I've come across some rather concerning and recent rumors floating around of automated UCAVs shooting (with simulated munitions, thankfully) their own control centers because of the gamified system of points they were using in testing and training. When the drones lost points for attacking friendlies or the wrong targets, they supposedly reasoned that the most direct solution was to destroy what was depriving them of points: the control center scoring them. That's one hell of an oversight, if you ask me, and that's a huge danger. Personally, I get the distinct impression that programmers tend deprive themselves of sleep in order to meet their deadlines--and that's on top of the usual expected oversights in purely logical solutions due to presumed ethics and other careless assumptions. <br /><br />Just a bad, bad idea. <br /><br />Furthermore, the USN of World War II was only able to pull off what they did because they had excellent damage control. That meant having all the crew drilled in damage control practices. That means having enough hands, enough personnel, around to do the hard work when things inevitably broke. <br /><br />So how does that apply to a ground vehicle? The big problem is the division of labor. Let me share an aphorism I grew up with: \"many hands makes for smaller work.\" The more people there are, the easier each individual's job will be, and the faster the job will get done. How do you expect two-man crews to fix a thrown track, or to perform other vital routine maintenance? The workload would be excessive, especially in the field, even if you were to have enough protected logistical detachments following them around. Setting aside that even that would require manpower, yet another Murphy's Law of Combat dictates that you will never have enough of what you need--you'll usually have too little of something, and occasionally you'll have too much of something which isn't incoming enemy fire, yet is undesirable. <br /><br />Crew exhaustion is a thing, too. If the crew's tired, they'll underperform. Everyone has their limits, after all, and it's not something that can be calculated or predicted with any degree of reliability. If the routine operations load is too high, that can impair crew effectiveness and responsiveness, too. See: any World War II tank with less than five crew. The M3 medium gets a pass because it was a wartime stopgap measure cooked up within an insanely short period of time, so while it was close to being \"good enough\" for the time it bought, it still had its fair share of shortcomings. It's also worth remembering that the U.S. Army didn't want mechanization in the interwar years, as they expected to be focusing on defending their southern borders, where they would still rely on horses. Looking at the terrain, it's no wonder they thought this. That and their focus on, and fascination with, aviation technology all but stopped AFV development. But I digress. <br /><br />It's hard to imagine how the Army intends to rely on automation to reduce crew sizes, let alone switch over to Unmanned Ground Combat Vehicles. Our network security seems awful, as it is. It's not helped by the alphabet soup agencies and foreign governments demanding backdoor access to everything. That's setting aside the myriad issues with technology and software--such as the fact that a terrifying majority of programs apparently relies on base code being maintained and updated by a single person who is quickly reaching his twilight years--if he's not already in them. <br /><br />In short, I'm against relying on automation to the extent that a lot of people seem to want. But I'm just some shmuck on the internet. ",
"to": [
"https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public"
],
"cc": [
"https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/892963254475694092/followers"
],
"tag": [],
"url": "https://www.minds.com/newsfeed/1529553198459654158",
"published": "2023-07-22T18:18:19+00:00",
"source": {
"content": "https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iFs6LG0TEyU\n\nInteresting. I'm not affiliated with The Chieftain, but I do appreciate and enjoy his content. \n\nIncreased automation, eh? It sounds like the Army is behind the Navy on this one. I'd heard, recently, that the Navy found that increased automation had decreased the overall survivability of their ships. When you stop and think--really think--about the realities of warfare, you'll realize why they came to the conclusion they did. \n\nFirst, consider the following: even at the best of times, automated systems tend to be very finicky. What do you suppose happens when those systems get damaged in combat? Remember, war is the absolute worst place for equipment; it's actual destruction of men and materiel, no matter how the warhawks try to sanitize and justify it in the lamestream media. War machines are complicated things. The more complex any given piece of hardware is, the more points of possible failure. In accordance with Murphy's Laws of Combat, those automated systems will fail at the worst possible time. Maybe even to the active detriment of the crew, or any nearby friendly elements.\n\nFor instance, I've come across some rather concerning and recent rumors floating around of automated UCAVs shooting (with simulated munitions, thankfully) their own control centers because of the gamified system of points they were using in testing and training. When the drones lost points for attacking friendlies or the wrong targets, they supposedly reasoned that the most direct solution was to destroy what was depriving them of points: the control center scoring them. That's one hell of an oversight, if you ask me, and that's a huge danger. Personally, I get the distinct impression that programmers tend deprive themselves of sleep in order to meet their deadlines--and that's on top of the usual expected oversights in purely logical solutions due to presumed ethics and other careless assumptions. \n\nJust a bad, bad idea. \n\nFurthermore, the USN of World War II was only able to pull off what they did because they had excellent damage control. That meant having all the crew drilled in damage control practices. That means having enough hands, enough personnel, around to do the hard work when things inevitably broke. \n\nSo how does that apply to a ground vehicle? The big problem is the division of labor. Let me share an aphorism I grew up with: \"many hands makes for smaller work.\" The more people there are, the easier each individual's job will be, and the faster the job will get done. How do you expect two-man crews to fix a thrown track, or to perform other vital routine maintenance? The workload would be excessive, especially in the field, even if you were to have enough protected logistical detachments following them around. Setting aside that even that would require manpower, yet another Murphy's Law of Combat dictates that you will never have enough of what you need--you'll usually have too little of something, and occasionally you'll have too much of something which isn't incoming enemy fire, yet is undesirable. \n\nCrew exhaustion is a thing, too. If the crew's tired, they'll underperform. Everyone has their limits, after all, and it's not something that can be calculated or predicted with any degree of reliability. If the routine operations load is too high, that can impair crew effectiveness and responsiveness, too. See: any World War II tank with less than five crew. The M3 medium gets a pass because it was a wartime stopgap measure cooked up within an insanely short period of time, so while it was close to being \"good enough\" for the time it bought, it still had its fair share of shortcomings. It's also worth remembering that the U.S. Army didn't want mechanization in the interwar years, as they expected to be focusing on defending their southern borders, where they would still rely on horses. Looking at the terrain, it's no wonder they thought this. That and their focus on, and fascination with, aviation technology all but stopped AFV development. But I digress. \n\nIt's hard to imagine how the Army intends to rely on automation to reduce crew sizes, let alone switch over to Unmanned Ground Combat Vehicles. Our network security seems awful, as it is. It's not helped by the alphabet soup agencies and foreign governments demanding backdoor access to everything. That's setting aside the myriad issues with technology and software--such as the fact that a terrifying majority of programs apparently relies on base code being maintained and updated by a single person who is quickly reaching his twilight years--if he's not already in them. \n\nIn short, I'm against relying on automation to the extent that a lot of people seem to want. But I'm just some shmuck on the internet. ",
"mediaType": "text/plain"
}
},
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/892963254475694092/entities/urn:activity:1529553198459654158/activity"
},
{
"type": "Create",
"actor": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/892963254475694092",
"object": {
"type": "Note",
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/892963254475694092/entities/urn:activity:1527489616930672650",
"attributedTo": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/892963254475694092",
"content": "I wonder if there's a corollary (if that's the right word) to \"thou shalt not make a machine in the likeness of a human mind,\" that goes something like \"thou shalt not make a human mind into the likeness of a machine.\"<br /><br />Something, something NPC meme. :V",
"to": [
"https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public"
],
"cc": [
"https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/892963254475694092/followers"
],
"tag": [],
"url": "https://www.minds.com/newsfeed/1527489616930672650",
"published": "2023-07-17T01:38:23+00:00",
"source": {
"content": "I wonder if there's a corollary (if that's the right word) to \"thou shalt not make a machine in the likeness of a human mind,\" that goes something like \"thou shalt not make a human mind into the likeness of a machine.\"\n\nSomething, something NPC meme. :V",
"mediaType": "text/plain"
}
},
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/892963254475694092/entities/urn:activity:1527489616930672650/activity"
},
{
"type": "Create",
"actor": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/892963254475694092",
"object": {
"type": "Note",
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/892963254475694092/entities/urn:activity:1527046709320880148",
"attributedTo": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/892963254475694092",
"content": "The current madness which grips the western sphere reminds me of one of my favorite Benjamin Franklin quotes: \"So convenient a thing it is to be a reasonable Creature, since it enables one to find or make a Reason for every thing one has a mind to do.\" <br /><br />In turn, that reminds me of another observation, the source of which I'm not familiar: \"raise a child up without morals and you but make him a clever devil.\"",
"to": [
"https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public"
],
"cc": [
"https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/892963254475694092/followers"
],
"tag": [],
"url": "https://www.minds.com/newsfeed/1527046709320880148",
"published": "2023-07-15T20:18:26+00:00",
"source": {
"content": "The current madness which grips the western sphere reminds me of one of my favorite Benjamin Franklin quotes: \"So convenient a thing it is to be a reasonable Creature, since it enables one to find or make a Reason for every thing one has a mind to do.\" \n\nIn turn, that reminds me of another observation, the source of which I'm not familiar: \"raise a child up without morals and you but make him a clever devil.\"",
"mediaType": "text/plain"
}
},
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/892963254475694092/entities/urn:activity:1527046709320880148/activity"
},
{
"type": "Create",
"actor": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/892963254475694092",
"object": {
"type": "Note",
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/892963254475694092/entities/urn:activity:1524875440966078478",
"attributedTo": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/892963254475694092",
"content": "<a href=\"https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1m2OY9uLJyM\" target=\"_blank\">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1m2OY9uLJyM</a><br /><br />Interesting. Suet fat comes from around organs like the kidneys, eh? It doesn't melt as readily as muscle fat, either? I seem to recall hearing (and observing) that it's really hard for people to get rid of belly fat and the like. I know I'm having trouble there. Could it be related?",
"to": [
"https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public"
],
"cc": [
"https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/892963254475694092/followers"
],
"tag": [],
"url": "https://www.minds.com/newsfeed/1524875440966078478",
"published": "2023-07-09T20:30:35+00:00",
"source": {
"content": "https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1m2OY9uLJyM\n\nInteresting. Suet fat comes from around organs like the kidneys, eh? It doesn't melt as readily as muscle fat, either? I seem to recall hearing (and observing) that it's really hard for people to get rid of belly fat and the like. I know I'm having trouble there. Could it be related?",
"mediaType": "text/plain"
}
},
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/892963254475694092/entities/urn:activity:1524875440966078478/activity"
},
{
"type": "Create",
"actor": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/892963254475694092",
"object": {
"type": "Note",
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/892963254475694092/entities/urn:activity:1519767359248666639",
"attributedTo": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/892963254475694092",
"content": "OK, now that's really cool and interesting. Not affiliated with Townsends, but I enjoy their content quite a bit. Excellent channel.<br /><br /><a href=\"https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6OyXj0m0OKI\" target=\"_blank\">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6OyXj0m0OKI</a>",
"to": [
"https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public"
],
"cc": [
"https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/892963254475694092/followers"
],
"tag": [],
"url": "https://www.minds.com/newsfeed/1519767359248666639",
"published": "2023-06-25T18:12:53+00:00",
"source": {
"content": "OK, now that's really cool and interesting. Not affiliated with Townsends, but I enjoy their content quite a bit. Excellent channel.\n\nhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6OyXj0m0OKI",
"mediaType": "text/plain"
}
},
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/892963254475694092/entities/urn:activity:1519767359248666639/activity"
},
{
"type": "Create",
"actor": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/892963254475694092",
"object": {
"type": "Note",
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/892963254475694092/entities/urn:activity:1519755653457907726",
"attributedTo": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/892963254475694092",
"content": "Oh, it's been awhile since I've looked at Greg's Airplanes and Automobiles. Good stuff. Still not affiliated in any way, I still appreciate the content. <br /><br /><a href=\"https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dKuNXLenci4\" target=\"_blank\">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dKuNXLenci4</a>",
"to": [
"https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public"
],
"cc": [
"https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/892963254475694092/followers"
],
"tag": [],
"url": "https://www.minds.com/newsfeed/1519755653457907726",
"published": "2023-06-25T17:26:22+00:00",
"source": {
"content": "Oh, it's been awhile since I've looked at Greg's Airplanes and Automobiles. Good stuff. Still not affiliated in any way, I still appreciate the content. \n\nhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dKuNXLenci4",
"mediaType": "text/plain"
}
},
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/892963254475694092/entities/urn:activity:1519755653457907726/activity"
},
{
"type": "Create",
"actor": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/892963254475694092",
"object": {
"type": "Note",
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/892963254475694092/entities/urn:activity:1517334113097355268",
"attributedTo": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/892963254475694092",
"content": "I really appreciate The Chieftain's work. Would recommend. There's just so much I'm learning, I can't even begin to list specifics. <br /><br /><a href=\"https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hLkJPGGQ4Jk\" target=\"_blank\">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hLkJPGGQ4Jk</a>",
"to": [
"https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public"
],
"cc": [
"https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/892963254475694092/followers"
],
"tag": [],
"url": "https://www.minds.com/newsfeed/1517334113097355268",
"published": "2023-06-19T01:04:02+00:00",
"source": {
"content": "I really appreciate The Chieftain's work. Would recommend. There's just so much I'm learning, I can't even begin to list specifics. \n\nhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hLkJPGGQ4Jk",
"mediaType": "text/plain"
}
},
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/892963254475694092/entities/urn:activity:1517334113097355268/activity"
},
{
"type": "Create",
"actor": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/892963254475694092",
"object": {
"type": "Note",
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/892963254475694092/entities/urn:activity:1515939529758871556",
"attributedTo": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/892963254475694092",
"content": "You know...that really makes one wonder what the point was, in the first place. Then again, I find myself agreeing with one commenter, that peacetime procurement and design have always been kind of wonky. That's just how things go, when people are left speculating on the nature of the next conflict. <br /><br />A friend linked me this, I'm not familiar with the channel. I'll have to make time to poke around some more. <br /><br /><a href=\"https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2BPZS8Tm_O8\" target=\"_blank\">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2BPZS8Tm_O8</a>",
"to": [
"https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public"
],
"cc": [
"https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/892963254475694092/followers"
],
"tag": [],
"url": "https://www.minds.com/newsfeed/1515939529758871556",
"published": "2023-06-15T04:42:28+00:00",
"source": {
"content": "You know...that really makes one wonder what the point was, in the first place. Then again, I find myself agreeing with one commenter, that peacetime procurement and design have always been kind of wonky. That's just how things go, when people are left speculating on the nature of the next conflict. \n\nA friend linked me this, I'm not familiar with the channel. I'll have to make time to poke around some more. \n\nhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2BPZS8Tm_O8",
"mediaType": "text/plain"
}
},
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/892963254475694092/entities/urn:activity:1515939529758871556/activity"
},
{
"type": "Create",
"actor": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/892963254475694092",
"object": {
"type": "Note",
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/892963254475694092/entities/urn:activity:1513082735428636674",
"attributedTo": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/892963254475694092",
"content": "I tried carrying the Irish Spring soap bar with me while watering, this morning, to test the repellent effect. I had wedged it under my trusty old Maxpedition Jumbo's main compartment flap so that I could carry it hands-free. <br /><br />Unfortunately, flies and mosquitoes came after me. However, when I tried removing the soap box from the Jumbo and held it in hand, they buggered off. Further testing required, but I've come to the tentative conclusion that high-density nylon fabric mitigates the repellent effect by a much greater degree than I had anticipated. Next time, I think I'll try sticking the soap box into the water bottle pocket and not using the cinch cord. If only I had something like a censer. Maybe that might be more practicable.<br /><br />Regardless, the effect radius seems a little small. Maybe half a meter. I'm not too good at gauging length or distance, for various reasons. It'll also be good to note how long the repellent effect lasts, over time. ",
"to": [
"https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public"
],
"cc": [
"https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/892963254475694092/followers"
],
"tag": [],
"url": "https://www.minds.com/newsfeed/1513082735428636674",
"published": "2023-06-07T07:30:35+00:00",
"source": {
"content": "I tried carrying the Irish Spring soap bar with me while watering, this morning, to test the repellent effect. I had wedged it under my trusty old Maxpedition Jumbo's main compartment flap so that I could carry it hands-free. \n\nUnfortunately, flies and mosquitoes came after me. However, when I tried removing the soap box from the Jumbo and held it in hand, they buggered off. Further testing required, but I've come to the tentative conclusion that high-density nylon fabric mitigates the repellent effect by a much greater degree than I had anticipated. Next time, I think I'll try sticking the soap box into the water bottle pocket and not using the cinch cord. If only I had something like a censer. Maybe that might be more practicable.\n\nRegardless, the effect radius seems a little small. Maybe half a meter. I'm not too good at gauging length or distance, for various reasons. It'll also be good to note how long the repellent effect lasts, over time. ",
"mediaType": "text/plain"
}
},
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/892963254475694092/entities/urn:activity:1513082735428636674/activity"
}
],
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/892963254475694092/outbox",
"partOf": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/892963254475694092/outboxoutbox"
}