ActivityPub Viewer

A small tool to view real-world ActivityPub objects as JSON! Enter a URL or username from Mastodon or a similar service below, and we'll send a request with the right Accept header to the server to view the underlying object.

Open in browser →
{ "@context": "https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams", "type": "OrderedCollectionPage", "orderedItems": [ { "type": "Announce", "actor": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/827549466264346625", "object": { "type": "Note", "id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1201659513891987476/entities/urn:activity:1215701863955509248", "attributedTo": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1201659513891987476", "content": " \"All animals are equal, but some animals are more equal than others.\"<br /><br />“A proclamation by the pigs who control the government in the novel ‘Animal Farm’, by George Orwell. The sentence is a comment on the hypocrisy of governments that proclaim the absolute equality of their citizens, but give power and privileges to a small elite' (see “The New Dictionary of Cultural Literacy”, 3rd Edition, 2002).”<br />^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^<br />See also: <br />‘When Will We Ever Be Equal?’ {Nov.20, 2020}: <br /> “Quebec considers itself a Nation within Canada, just as the Aboriginals do. We are not all equal in this country. When will we ever be equal?”<br />This was our response...”<br /><a href=\"https://canadiansforlegalequality.wordpress.com/2020/11/20/when-will-we-ever-be-equal/\" target=\"_blank\">https://canadiansforlegalequality.wordpress.com/2020/11/20/when-will-we-ever-be-equal/</a><br /><br />‘The Strange Case of Canadian ‘Legal Equality’ (Charter Section 15):<br />“The political — and therefore, ‘flexible’ — tool that is subsection (2) means that the Constitutional Principle of Section 15(1) cannot really exist as a ‘Principle’, and merely serves as an inspirational introduction to the court-driven social engineering enabled by subsection (2). <br /><br />“As a result, legal equality of individual Canadian citizens has become a thing of the past...” <br /><a href=\"https://canadiansforlegalequality.wordpress.com/2016/03/08/the-strange-case-of-canadian-legal-equality/\" target=\"_blank\">https://canadiansforlegalequality.wordpress.com/2016/03/08/the-strange-case-of-canadian-legal-equality/</a><br /><br /> “Aboriginal rights cannot...be defined on the basis of the philosophical precepts of the liberal enlightenment. Although equal in importance and significance to the rights enshrined in the Charter, aboriginal rights must be viewed differently from Charter rights because they are held only by aboriginal members of Canadian society. They arise from the fact that aboriginal peoples are aboriginal...<br /><br /> “The task of this court is to define aboriginal rights in a manner which recognizes that aboriginal rights are rights, but which does so without losing sight of the fact that they are rights held by aboriginal peoples because they are aboriginal...”<br />--Chief Justice Antonio Lamer, ‘Van der Peet’ (1996)<br /><a href=\"https://scc-csc.lexum.com/scc-csc/scc-csc/en/item/1407/index.do\" target=\"_blank\">https://scc-csc.lexum.com/scc-csc/scc-csc/en/item/1407/index.do</a><br /><br />‘Quebecers Opposed To Special Rights for Aboriginals’ (Poll) {Dec.21, 2020}:<br />There should be no ‘special rights’ for any group of Canadians...but Quebecers agreeing with this is somewhat ironic. It would seem that what's 'good for the goose' isn't 'good for the gander'...<br /><br /> “Quebecers think it’s important for ‘Indigenous’ people and non-‘Indigenous’ people to have the same rights. They are opposed to special or additional rights that certain politicians seem to want to grant to ‘First Nations’.”<br /><a href=\"https://canadiansforlegalequalityblog.wordpress.com/2020/12/21/quebecers-opposed-to-special-rights-for-aboriginals/\" target=\"_blank\">https://canadiansforlegalequalityblog.wordpress.com/2020/12/21/quebecers-opposed-to-special-rights-for-aboriginals/</a><br /><br />Post also at:<br /><a href=\"https://canadiansforlegalequalityblog.wordpress.com/2021/03/08/all-animals-are-equal/\" target=\"_blank\">https://canadiansforlegalequalityblog.wordpress.com/2021/03/08/all-animals-are-equal/</a>", "to": [ "https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public" ], "cc": [ "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1201659513891987476/followers" ], "tag": [], "url": "https://www.minds.com/newsfeed/1215701863955509248", "published": "2021-03-08T16:46:36+00:00", "source": { "content": " \"All animals are equal, but some animals are more equal than others.\"\n\n“A proclamation by the pigs who control the government in the novel ‘Animal Farm’, by George Orwell. The sentence is a comment on the hypocrisy of governments that proclaim the absolute equality of their citizens, but give power and privileges to a small elite' (see “The New Dictionary of Cultural Literacy”, 3rd Edition, 2002).”\n^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^\nSee also: \n‘When Will We Ever Be Equal?’ {Nov.20, 2020}: \n “Quebec considers itself a Nation within Canada, just as the Aboriginals do. We are not all equal in this country. When will we ever be equal?”\nThis was our response...”\nhttps://canadiansforlegalequality.wordpress.com/2020/11/20/when-will-we-ever-be-equal/\n\n‘The Strange Case of Canadian ‘Legal Equality’ (Charter Section 15):\n“The political — and therefore, ‘flexible’ — tool that is subsection (2) means that the Constitutional Principle of Section 15(1) cannot really exist as a ‘Principle’, and merely serves as an inspirational introduction to the court-driven social engineering enabled by subsection (2). \n\n“As a result, legal equality of individual Canadian citizens has become a thing of the past...” \nhttps://canadiansforlegalequality.wordpress.com/2016/03/08/the-strange-case-of-canadian-legal-equality/\n\n “Aboriginal rights cannot...be defined on the basis of the philosophical precepts of the liberal enlightenment. Although equal in importance and significance to the rights enshrined in the Charter, aboriginal rights must be viewed differently from Charter rights because they are held only by aboriginal members of Canadian society. They arise from the fact that aboriginal peoples are aboriginal...\n\n “The task of this court is to define aboriginal rights in a manner which recognizes that aboriginal rights are rights, but which does so without losing sight of the fact that they are rights held by aboriginal peoples because they are aboriginal...”\n--Chief Justice Antonio Lamer, ‘Van der Peet’ (1996)\nhttps://scc-csc.lexum.com/scc-csc/scc-csc/en/item/1407/index.do\n\n‘Quebecers Opposed To Special Rights for Aboriginals’ (Poll) {Dec.21, 2020}:\nThere should be no ‘special rights’ for any group of Canadians...but Quebecers agreeing with this is somewhat ironic. It would seem that what's 'good for the goose' isn't 'good for the gander'...\n\n “Quebecers think it’s important for ‘Indigenous’ people and non-‘Indigenous’ people to have the same rights. They are opposed to special or additional rights that certain politicians seem to want to grant to ‘First Nations’.”\nhttps://canadiansforlegalequalityblog.wordpress.com/2020/12/21/quebecers-opposed-to-special-rights-for-aboriginals/\n\nPost also at:\nhttps://canadiansforlegalequalityblog.wordpress.com/2021/03/08/all-animals-are-equal/", "mediaType": "text/plain" } }, "id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/827549466264346625/entities/urn:activity:1215726174848999424/activity", "to": [ "https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public" ], "cc": [ "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1201659513891987476", "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/827549466264346625/followers" ] }, { "type": "Announce", "actor": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/827549466264346625", "object": { "type": "Note", "id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1201659513891987476/entities/urn:activity:1215701863955509248", "attributedTo": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1201659513891987476", "content": " \"All animals are equal, but some animals are more equal than others.\"<br /><br />“A proclamation by the pigs who control the government in the novel ‘Animal Farm’, by George Orwell. The sentence is a comment on the hypocrisy of governments that proclaim the absolute equality of their citizens, but give power and privileges to a small elite' (see “The New Dictionary of Cultural Literacy”, 3rd Edition, 2002).”<br />^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^<br />See also: <br />‘When Will We Ever Be Equal?’ {Nov.20, 2020}: <br /> “Quebec considers itself a Nation within Canada, just as the Aboriginals do. We are not all equal in this country. When will we ever be equal?”<br />This was our response...”<br /><a href=\"https://canadiansforlegalequality.wordpress.com/2020/11/20/when-will-we-ever-be-equal/\" target=\"_blank\">https://canadiansforlegalequality.wordpress.com/2020/11/20/when-will-we-ever-be-equal/</a><br /><br />‘The Strange Case of Canadian ‘Legal Equality’ (Charter Section 15):<br />“The political — and therefore, ‘flexible’ — tool that is subsection (2) means that the Constitutional Principle of Section 15(1) cannot really exist as a ‘Principle’, and merely serves as an inspirational introduction to the court-driven social engineering enabled by subsection (2). <br /><br />“As a result, legal equality of individual Canadian citizens has become a thing of the past...” <br /><a href=\"https://canadiansforlegalequality.wordpress.com/2016/03/08/the-strange-case-of-canadian-legal-equality/\" target=\"_blank\">https://canadiansforlegalequality.wordpress.com/2016/03/08/the-strange-case-of-canadian-legal-equality/</a><br /><br /> “Aboriginal rights cannot...be defined on the basis of the philosophical precepts of the liberal enlightenment. Although equal in importance and significance to the rights enshrined in the Charter, aboriginal rights must be viewed differently from Charter rights because they are held only by aboriginal members of Canadian society. They arise from the fact that aboriginal peoples are aboriginal...<br /><br /> “The task of this court is to define aboriginal rights in a manner which recognizes that aboriginal rights are rights, but which does so without losing sight of the fact that they are rights held by aboriginal peoples because they are aboriginal...”<br />--Chief Justice Antonio Lamer, ‘Van der Peet’ (1996)<br /><a href=\"https://scc-csc.lexum.com/scc-csc/scc-csc/en/item/1407/index.do\" target=\"_blank\">https://scc-csc.lexum.com/scc-csc/scc-csc/en/item/1407/index.do</a><br /><br />‘Quebecers Opposed To Special Rights for Aboriginals’ (Poll) {Dec.21, 2020}:<br />There should be no ‘special rights’ for any group of Canadians...but Quebecers agreeing with this is somewhat ironic. It would seem that what's 'good for the goose' isn't 'good for the gander'...<br /><br /> “Quebecers think it’s important for ‘Indigenous’ people and non-‘Indigenous’ people to have the same rights. They are opposed to special or additional rights that certain politicians seem to want to grant to ‘First Nations’.”<br /><a href=\"https://canadiansforlegalequalityblog.wordpress.com/2020/12/21/quebecers-opposed-to-special-rights-for-aboriginals/\" target=\"_blank\">https://canadiansforlegalequalityblog.wordpress.com/2020/12/21/quebecers-opposed-to-special-rights-for-aboriginals/</a><br /><br />Post also at:<br /><a href=\"https://canadiansforlegalequalityblog.wordpress.com/2021/03/08/all-animals-are-equal/\" target=\"_blank\">https://canadiansforlegalequalityblog.wordpress.com/2021/03/08/all-animals-are-equal/</a>", "to": [ "https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public" ], "cc": [ "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1201659513891987476/followers" ], "tag": [], "url": "https://www.minds.com/newsfeed/1215701863955509248", "published": "2021-03-08T16:46:36+00:00", "source": { "content": " \"All animals are equal, but some animals are more equal than others.\"\n\n“A proclamation by the pigs who control the government in the novel ‘Animal Farm’, by George Orwell. The sentence is a comment on the hypocrisy of governments that proclaim the absolute equality of their citizens, but give power and privileges to a small elite' (see “The New Dictionary of Cultural Literacy”, 3rd Edition, 2002).”\n^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^\nSee also: \n‘When Will We Ever Be Equal?’ {Nov.20, 2020}: \n “Quebec considers itself a Nation within Canada, just as the Aboriginals do. We are not all equal in this country. When will we ever be equal?”\nThis was our response...”\nhttps://canadiansforlegalequality.wordpress.com/2020/11/20/when-will-we-ever-be-equal/\n\n‘The Strange Case of Canadian ‘Legal Equality’ (Charter Section 15):\n“The political — and therefore, ‘flexible’ — tool that is subsection (2) means that the Constitutional Principle of Section 15(1) cannot really exist as a ‘Principle’, and merely serves as an inspirational introduction to the court-driven social engineering enabled by subsection (2). \n\n“As a result, legal equality of individual Canadian citizens has become a thing of the past...” \nhttps://canadiansforlegalequality.wordpress.com/2016/03/08/the-strange-case-of-canadian-legal-equality/\n\n “Aboriginal rights cannot...be defined on the basis of the philosophical precepts of the liberal enlightenment. Although equal in importance and significance to the rights enshrined in the Charter, aboriginal rights must be viewed differently from Charter rights because they are held only by aboriginal members of Canadian society. They arise from the fact that aboriginal peoples are aboriginal...\n\n “The task of this court is to define aboriginal rights in a manner which recognizes that aboriginal rights are rights, but which does so without losing sight of the fact that they are rights held by aboriginal peoples because they are aboriginal...”\n--Chief Justice Antonio Lamer, ‘Van der Peet’ (1996)\nhttps://scc-csc.lexum.com/scc-csc/scc-csc/en/item/1407/index.do\n\n‘Quebecers Opposed To Special Rights for Aboriginals’ (Poll) {Dec.21, 2020}:\nThere should be no ‘special rights’ for any group of Canadians...but Quebecers agreeing with this is somewhat ironic. It would seem that what's 'good for the goose' isn't 'good for the gander'...\n\n “Quebecers think it’s important for ‘Indigenous’ people and non-‘Indigenous’ people to have the same rights. They are opposed to special or additional rights that certain politicians seem to want to grant to ‘First Nations’.”\nhttps://canadiansforlegalequalityblog.wordpress.com/2020/12/21/quebecers-opposed-to-special-rights-for-aboriginals/\n\nPost also at:\nhttps://canadiansforlegalequalityblog.wordpress.com/2021/03/08/all-animals-are-equal/", "mediaType": "text/plain" } }, "id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/827549466264346625/entities/urn:activity:1215725867616944128/activity", "to": [ "https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public" ], "cc": [ "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1201659513891987476", "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/827549466264346625/followers" ] }, { "type": "Create", "actor": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/827549466264346625", "object": { "type": "Note", "id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/827549466264346625/entities/urn:activity:1201649393450205184", "attributedTo": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/827549466264346625", "content": "This Aboriginal tribe wants to ‘take back its sovereignty’ by using Canadian taxpayers’ funds. Someone needs to teach them the meaning of the English word “sovereignty” {“supreme power or authority”, “a self-governing state”}. In addition, they need to read ‘Treaty 8’. There is no entitlement to”free housing”...<br /><br /> “Under our Treaty that was signed on July 25, 1900 in Fort Resolution, N.W.T. We're entitled to free housing. Transfer ownership to me because they're not fulfilling their treaty obligation.\"<br /><a href=\"https://endracebasedlaw.ca/2021/01/28/pretending-to-be-sovereign/\" target=\"_blank\">https://endracebasedlaw.ca/2021/01/28/pretending-to-be-sovereign/</a><br /><br /><a href=\"https://gab.com/ENDRACEBASEDLAWCanada/posts/105635503628173137\" target=\"_blank\">https://gab.com/ENDRACEBASEDLAWCanada/posts/105635503628173137</a>", "to": [ "https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public" ], "cc": [ "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/827549466264346625/followers" ], "tag": [], "url": "https://www.minds.com/newsfeed/1201649393450205184", "published": "2021-01-28T22:05:40+00:00", "source": { "content": "This Aboriginal tribe wants to ‘take back its sovereignty’ by using Canadian taxpayers’ funds. Someone needs to teach them the meaning of the English word “sovereignty” {“supreme power or authority”, “a self-governing state”}. In addition, they need to read ‘Treaty 8’. There is no entitlement to”free housing”...\n\n “Under our Treaty that was signed on July 25, 1900 in Fort Resolution, N.W.T. We're entitled to free housing. Transfer ownership to me because they're not fulfilling their treaty obligation.\"\nhttps://endracebasedlaw.ca/2021/01/28/pretending-to-be-sovereign/\n\nhttps://gab.com/ENDRACEBASEDLAWCanada/posts/105635503628173137", "mediaType": "text/plain" } }, "id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/827549466264346625/entities/urn:activity:1201649393450205184/activity" }, { "type": "Create", "actor": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/827549466264346625", "object": { "type": "Note", "id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/827549466264346625/entities/urn:activity:1009280245371654144", "attributedTo": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/827549466264346625", "content": "<a href=\"https://www.minds.com/ENDRACEBASEDLAW/blog/end-race-based-law-canada-1009280244151111680\" target=\"_blank\">https://www.minds.com/ENDRACEBASEDLAW/blog/end-race-based-law-canada-1009280244151111680</a>", "to": [ "https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public" ], "cc": [ "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/827549466264346625/followers" ], "tag": [], "url": "https://www.minds.com/newsfeed/1009280245371654144", "published": "2019-08-17T01:59:22+00:00", "source": { "content": "https://www.minds.com/ENDRACEBASEDLAW/blog/end-race-based-law-canada-1009280244151111680", "mediaType": "text/plain" } }, "id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/827549466264346625/entities/urn:activity:1009280245371654144/activity" }, { "type": "Create", "actor": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/827549466264346625", "object": { "type": "Note", "id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/827549466264346625/entities/urn:activity:1009276485648420864", "attributedTo": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/827549466264346625", "content": "<a href=\"https://www.minds.com/newsfeed/1009276485648420864\" target=\"_blank\">https://www.minds.com/newsfeed/1009276485648420864</a>", "to": [ "https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public" ], "cc": [ "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/827549466264346625/followers", "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/645613692976640017" ], "tag": [], "url": "https://www.minds.com/newsfeed/1009276485648420864", "published": "2019-08-17T01:44:25+00:00", "inReplyTo": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/645613692976640017/entities/urn:activity:1009142029159124992", "source": { "content": "https://www.minds.com/newsfeed/1009276485648420864", "mediaType": "text/plain" } }, "id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/827549466264346625/entities/urn:activity:1009276485648420864/activity" } ], "id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/827549466264346625/outbox", "partOf": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/827549466264346625/outboxoutbox" }