A small tool to view real-world ActivityPub objects as JSON! Enter a URL
or username from Mastodon or a similar service below, and we'll send a
request with
the right
Accept
header
to the server to view the underlying object.
{
"@context": "https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams",
"type": "OrderedCollectionPage",
"orderedItems": [
{
"type": "Create",
"actor": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/799286458014769159",
"object": {
"type": "Note",
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/799286458014769159/entities/urn:activity:880640231776997376",
"attributedTo": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/799286458014769159",
"content": "NULLIFY THE LAW <br /><br />Okay . . . virtually everything that the corporate government does and or serves on you, can be nullified nullified by simply writing across the “instrument” or “item” “Returned for Cause, Without Commercial Dishonor and No Recourse” . . . and above your signature write “Without Prejudice UCC 1-308”.<br />Study the three attachments. Read the Remedy by non-assumpsit first . . . should bring you up to speed to deal with understanding the other two . . . This cuts the administrative process off at the knees . . . <br /><br />Government has no jurisdiction under the constitution.<br /><br /> Important : UCC 1-207 has been moved to UCC 1-308 to hide it from the public. Also you will need to make written motions along with the verbal procedure in court in this article “The UCC Connection” Additionally, lower level state courts and magistrates will not know what you are talking about. You have to either appeal to a higher court an/or ask for a real judge. In Federal court they will offer you a magistrate. Never accept a magistrate. You always want a real judge.I have enclosed a notification of reservation of rights. Make sure you get it notarized and then file it with the county to make it public record. This is usually the same place that you file a marriage license. After they stamp it filed, then make several copies and send it to real judges on the state and Federal level. Certified mail and return receipt. If signature is refused, then just send it first class mail and they are then responsible for its knowledge. Be sure to keep all of your mail receipts. DO NOT send it to magistrates or judges that only try traffic tickets and dog bites etc.. Send it to real judges that try real felonies. It’ll take about 15 to 30 days, but there will never be a warrant issued for your arrest or to search your property unless Ya actually harm someone. Also so you should not get a traffic ticket. Sometimes the judges fail to put you on the list for diplomatic immunity. If you do get a traffic ticket, then just appeal the decision of the traffic ticket court to the next court up and file a motion to dismiss because of reservation of rights. Then you may never hear from them again, or they will drag it out up to a year trying to wear you down or scare you into a plea bargain. But stick to your guns and do not give in. There is nothing they can do. The fact is that he will never rule on your motion but continue to drag out the case until they can no longer try you. This is usually 12 months. Then you file a motion to dismiss because you did not receive a speedy trial.To test for diplomatic immunity, I suggest getting a parking ticket or removing your car tags. This way if you are not on the list and do get a ticket, this non moving violation ticket should not hurt your insurance in case ya mess up the process.<br /><br />How the UCC 1-308 works. <br />Compare that the constitution for the US establishes for the court’s jurisdiction at common law, equity and admiralty under article 3. As opposed to this, the Federal corporation establishes a similar jurisdiction except as principles under the Uniform commercial code. See… <br /> UCC § 1-103. Supplementary General Principles of Law Applicable.<br />Unless displaced by the particular provisions of this Act, the principles of law and equity, including the law merchant and the law relative to capacity to contract, principal and agent, estoppel, fraud, misrepresentation, duress, coercion, mistake, Bankruptcy, or other validating or invalidating cause shall supplement its provisions. <br /><br />Anytime ya see law by itself as in the foregoing, it means the common law. Except that they are taking the common law jurisdiction from the contract the UCC. The remedy of course is UCC 1-308. So the UCC is a deceptive criminal contractual constitution of sorts to those who uses it against us. <br /><br />UCC 1-308 is the remedy for any legal process under commercial law in the U.S.<br /><br />UCC § 1-308. Performance or Acceptance Under Reservation of Rights.(a) A party that with explicit reservation of rights performs or promises performance or assents to performance in a manner demanded or offered by the other party does not thereby prejudice the rights reserved. Such words as “without prejudice,” “under protest,” or the like are sufficient. <br /><br />Since the Federal Corporation is just that, a corporation. It has no jurisdiction except with those that contract with it. Also see Congressional act of 1871 and USC Title 28, Part VI, chapter 176, sub chapter 176, subsection A, 3002 (15) “United States” means—(A) a Federal corporation;<br /><br />The states illegally contracted with the federal corporation by passing the Uniform Commercial Code making themselves as well as the unsuspecting people subject to the Federal corporation and also to the states in their new commercial capacities. Therefore all of the laws (color of law) are contractual commercial laws and the remedy is UCC 1-308. The Uniform Commercial Code makes all crimes commercial only by contract as per 27 CFR 72.11. The problem is that you have to get into higher courts before they will recognize the remedy. The remedy however should legally and always be give without delay on demand or claim. This of course is the problem. The misdemeanor courts do not have a clue as to where their jurisdiction comes from and neither do magistrates. You have to get in front of a court with a real judge that tries felonies. The courts try to string ya along under duress of threat hoping that you can be scared into a plea. But they in the end have to honor the remedy. <br /><br />27 CFR 72.11 PART 72_DISPOSITION OF SEIZED PERSONAL PROPERTY–Table of Contents <br /><br />Subpart B_Definitions Commercial crimes. Any of the following types of crimes (Federal or State): Offenses against the revenue laws; burglary; counterfeiting; forgery; kidnapping; larceny; robbery; illegal sale or possession of deadly weapons; prostitution (including soliciting, procuring, pandering, white slaving, keeping house of ill fame, and like offenses); extortion; swindling and confidence games; and attempting to commit, conspiring to commit, or compounding any of the foregoing crimes. Addiction to narcotic drugs and use of marihuana will be treated as if such were commercial crime. <br /><br />Last note: The 14th amendment actually creates a lower class of “citizen of the United States” rather than the higher Citizenship of one of the several states of the union. The remedy provided to the 14th amendment, is an act by congress known as 15 United States Statute at Large, July 27, 1868, one day before the 14th Amendment took effect and also known as the “Expatriation Statute.” This is your remedy to claim to be a natural Citizen of your state. This makes you a higher Citizen and no longer subject to the Article 4 loophole that also deprives you of your rights.<br /><br />Notification of reservation of rights<br /><br />UCC1-308/UCC 1-207<br /><br />PUBLIC Your name here, __________sui juris<br /><br />THIS IS A PUBLIC COMMUNICATION TO ALL <br />All rights reserved<br /><br />UCC1-308<br /><br />Notice to agents is notice to principles<br />Your Address<br /><br />Notice to principles is Notice to Agents <br />Your Address<br /><br />Applications to all successors and assigns <br />Your Address<br /><br />All are without excuse <br />Phone: XXX XXX XXXX<br /><br />Let it be known to all that I, your name here explicitly reserves all of my rights.<br /><br />UCC1-308 which was formally UCC 1-207.<br /><br />Further, let all be advised that all actions commenced against me may be in violation of,…<br /><br />USC TITLE 18 > PARTI > CHAPTER 13 > § 242 Deprivation of rights under color of law<br /><br />USC TITLE 18 > PARTI > CHAPTER 13 > § 241 Conspiracy against rights<br /><br />Wherefore all have undeniable knowledge.<br /><br /> <br /><br />AFFIDAVIT<br /><br />Affiant, your name here, sui juris, a common man of the Sovereign People, does swear and affirm that Affiant has scribed and read the foregoing facts, and in accordance with the best of Affiant’s firsthand knowledge and conviction, such are true, correct, complete, and not misleading, the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth.<br /><br />Signed ___________________________sui juris, This Affidavit is dated________.<br /><br /> NOTARY PUBLIC<br /><br />STATE OF COUNTY OF______________________________________________________________<br /><br />Subscribed and sworn to before me, a Notary Public, the above signed your name here.<br /><br />This day of _________________________, 2009<br /><br />Notary Public MY COMMISSION EXPIRES:_______________________________________<br /><br />*************************************************** <br /><br />If you have been arrested, then you will need to file one of the motions below. If you are in a state court that only tries misdemeanors like traffic tickets and dog bites, they will not know what the motion is about and will will find you guilty. You simply appeal it to the higher court and file the same motion. If you are in a federal court, make sure that you are in front of a real judge. NEVER ACCEPT A MAGISTRATE !! The judge will act dismissive of your motion to scare you into a plea bargain and will continue to to make you appear before the court with all sorts of hearings and may even schedule a court date. But just keep reminding him to rule on your motion. The fact is that he will never rule on your motion but continue to drag out the case until they can no longer try you. This is usually 12 months. Then you file a motion to dismiss because you did not receive a speedy trial. The judge has to dismiss your case so do not be scared into a plea bargain of any kind. He will not rule on your motion but pick out some technicality that was made by the prosecution or officer. After this you will have the equivalent of diplomatic immunity and will never even get a ticket. You can only be arrested for causing injury to another party. However, just file the same motion to dismiss because the court still has no jurisdiction.<br /><br />(Place the name of the court as per example<br /><br />THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS )<br /><br /> <br /><br />MOTION TO DISMISS<br /><br />(Plaintiffs name here) Plaintiff<br /><br /> VS Case number (number here)<br /><br />(Defendants name here) Defendant<br /><br />Motion to Dismiss.<br /><br />The defendant moves the court to dismiss this case against for the following reasons.<br /><br />1. THE RESERVATION OF MY RIGHTS.<br /><br />I explicitly reserve all of my rights. UCC 1-308 which was formally UCC 1-207.<br /><br />§ 1-308. Performance or Acceptance Under Reservation of Rights.<br /><br />(a) A party that with explicit reservation of rights performs or promises performance or assents to<br /><br />performance in a manner demanded or offered by the other party does not thereby prejudice<br /><br />the rights reserved. Such words as “without prejudice,” “under protest,” or the like are<br /><br />sufficient.<br /><br />2. FURTHER ADVISEMENT<br /><br />This is to advise that all of the actions of the court and all others in these cases against Defendant<br /><br />are in violation of …<br /><br />A. USC TITLE 18 > PART I > CHAPTER 13 > § 242 Deprivation of rights under color of law<br /><br />B. USC TITLE 18 > PART I > CHAPTER 13 > § 241 Conspiracy against rights<br /><br />WHEREFORE, Defendant prays for the foregoing speedy relief.<br /><br />Kindest and warmest regards,<br /><br />Signed__________________________________________<br /><br />Without prejudice UCC 1-308<br /><br />From the defendant: (Your name here)<br /><br />Physical address<br /><br />Mailing address<br /><br />Phone<br /><br /> ",
"to": [
"https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public"
],
"cc": [
"https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/799286458014769159/followers"
],
"tag": [],
"url": "https://www.minds.com/newsfeed/880640231776997376",
"published": "2018-08-27T02:29:52+00:00",
"source": {
"content": "NULLIFY THE LAW \n\nOkay . . . virtually everything that the corporate government does and or serves on you, can be nullified nullified by simply writing across the “instrument” or “item” “Returned for Cause, Without Commercial Dishonor and No Recourse” . . . and above your signature write “Without Prejudice UCC 1-308”.\nStudy the three attachments. Read the Remedy by non-assumpsit first . . . should bring you up to speed to deal with understanding the other two . . . This cuts the administrative process off at the knees . . . \n\nGovernment has no jurisdiction under the constitution.\n\n Important : UCC 1-207 has been moved to UCC 1-308 to hide it from the public. Also you will need to make written motions along with the verbal procedure in court in this article “The UCC Connection” Additionally, lower level state courts and magistrates will not know what you are talking about. You have to either appeal to a higher court an/or ask for a real judge. In Federal court they will offer you a magistrate. Never accept a magistrate. You always want a real judge.I have enclosed a notification of reservation of rights. Make sure you get it notarized and then file it with the county to make it public record. This is usually the same place that you file a marriage license. After they stamp it filed, then make several copies and send it to real judges on the state and Federal level. Certified mail and return receipt. If signature is refused, then just send it first class mail and they are then responsible for its knowledge. Be sure to keep all of your mail receipts. DO NOT send it to magistrates or judges that only try traffic tickets and dog bites etc.. Send it to real judges that try real felonies. It’ll take about 15 to 30 days, but there will never be a warrant issued for your arrest or to search your property unless Ya actually harm someone. Also so you should not get a traffic ticket. Sometimes the judges fail to put you on the list for diplomatic immunity. If you do get a traffic ticket, then just appeal the decision of the traffic ticket court to the next court up and file a motion to dismiss because of reservation of rights. Then you may never hear from them again, or they will drag it out up to a year trying to wear you down or scare you into a plea bargain. But stick to your guns and do not give in. There is nothing they can do. The fact is that he will never rule on your motion but continue to drag out the case until they can no longer try you. This is usually 12 months. Then you file a motion to dismiss because you did not receive a speedy trial.To test for diplomatic immunity, I suggest getting a parking ticket or removing your car tags. This way if you are not on the list and do get a ticket, this non moving violation ticket should not hurt your insurance in case ya mess up the process.\n\nHow the UCC 1-308 works. \nCompare that the constitution for the US establishes for the court’s jurisdiction at common law, equity and admiralty under article 3. As opposed to this, the Federal corporation establishes a similar jurisdiction except as principles under the Uniform commercial code. See… \n UCC § 1-103. Supplementary General Principles of Law Applicable.\nUnless displaced by the particular provisions of this Act, the principles of law and equity, including the law merchant and the law relative to capacity to contract, principal and agent, estoppel, fraud, misrepresentation, duress, coercion, mistake, Bankruptcy, or other validating or invalidating cause shall supplement its provisions. \n\nAnytime ya see law by itself as in the foregoing, it means the common law. Except that they are taking the common law jurisdiction from the contract the UCC. The remedy of course is UCC 1-308. So the UCC is a deceptive criminal contractual constitution of sorts to those who uses it against us. \n\nUCC 1-308 is the remedy for any legal process under commercial law in the U.S.\n\nUCC § 1-308. Performance or Acceptance Under Reservation of Rights.(a) A party that with explicit reservation of rights performs or promises performance or assents to performance in a manner demanded or offered by the other party does not thereby prejudice the rights reserved. Such words as “without prejudice,” “under protest,” or the like are sufficient. \n\nSince the Federal Corporation is just that, a corporation. It has no jurisdiction except with those that contract with it. Also see Congressional act of 1871 and USC Title 28, Part VI, chapter 176, sub chapter 176, subsection A, 3002 (15) “United States” means—(A) a Federal corporation;\n\nThe states illegally contracted with the federal corporation by passing the Uniform Commercial Code making themselves as well as the unsuspecting people subject to the Federal corporation and also to the states in their new commercial capacities. Therefore all of the laws (color of law) are contractual commercial laws and the remedy is UCC 1-308. The Uniform Commercial Code makes all crimes commercial only by contract as per 27 CFR 72.11. The problem is that you have to get into higher courts before they will recognize the remedy. The remedy however should legally and always be give without delay on demand or claim. This of course is the problem. The misdemeanor courts do not have a clue as to where their jurisdiction comes from and neither do magistrates. You have to get in front of a court with a real judge that tries felonies. The courts try to string ya along under duress of threat hoping that you can be scared into a plea. But they in the end have to honor the remedy. \n\n27 CFR 72.11 PART 72_DISPOSITION OF SEIZED PERSONAL PROPERTY–Table of Contents \n\nSubpart B_Definitions Commercial crimes. Any of the following types of crimes (Federal or State): Offenses against the revenue laws; burglary; counterfeiting; forgery; kidnapping; larceny; robbery; illegal sale or possession of deadly weapons; prostitution (including soliciting, procuring, pandering, white slaving, keeping house of ill fame, and like offenses); extortion; swindling and confidence games; and attempting to commit, conspiring to commit, or compounding any of the foregoing crimes. Addiction to narcotic drugs and use of marihuana will be treated as if such were commercial crime. \n\nLast note: The 14th amendment actually creates a lower class of “citizen of the United States” rather than the higher Citizenship of one of the several states of the union. The remedy provided to the 14th amendment, is an act by congress known as 15 United States Statute at Large, July 27, 1868, one day before the 14th Amendment took effect and also known as the “Expatriation Statute.” This is your remedy to claim to be a natural Citizen of your state. This makes you a higher Citizen and no longer subject to the Article 4 loophole that also deprives you of your rights.\n\nNotification of reservation of rights\n\nUCC1-308/UCC 1-207\n\nPUBLIC Your name here, __________sui juris\n\nTHIS IS A PUBLIC COMMUNICATION TO ALL \nAll rights reserved\n\nUCC1-308\n\nNotice to agents is notice to principles\nYour Address\n\nNotice to principles is Notice to Agents \nYour Address\n\nApplications to all successors and assigns \nYour Address\n\nAll are without excuse \nPhone: XXX XXX XXXX\n\nLet it be known to all that I, your name here explicitly reserves all of my rights.\n\nUCC1-308 which was formally UCC 1-207.\n\nFurther, let all be advised that all actions commenced against me may be in violation of,…\n\nUSC TITLE 18 > PARTI > CHAPTER 13 > § 242 Deprivation of rights under color of law\n\nUSC TITLE 18 > PARTI > CHAPTER 13 > § 241 Conspiracy against rights\n\nWherefore all have undeniable knowledge.\n\n \n\nAFFIDAVIT\n\nAffiant, your name here, sui juris, a common man of the Sovereign People, does swear and affirm that Affiant has scribed and read the foregoing facts, and in accordance with the best of Affiant’s firsthand knowledge and conviction, such are true, correct, complete, and not misleading, the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth.\n\nSigned ___________________________sui juris, This Affidavit is dated________.\n\n NOTARY PUBLIC\n\nSTATE OF COUNTY OF______________________________________________________________\n\nSubscribed and sworn to before me, a Notary Public, the above signed your name here.\n\nThis day of _________________________, 2009\n\nNotary Public MY COMMISSION EXPIRES:_______________________________________\n\n*************************************************** \n\nIf you have been arrested, then you will need to file one of the motions below. If you are in a state court that only tries misdemeanors like traffic tickets and dog bites, they will not know what the motion is about and will will find you guilty. You simply appeal it to the higher court and file the same motion. If you are in a federal court, make sure that you are in front of a real judge. NEVER ACCEPT A MAGISTRATE !! The judge will act dismissive of your motion to scare you into a plea bargain and will continue to to make you appear before the court with all sorts of hearings and may even schedule a court date. But just keep reminding him to rule on your motion. The fact is that he will never rule on your motion but continue to drag out the case until they can no longer try you. This is usually 12 months. Then you file a motion to dismiss because you did not receive a speedy trial. The judge has to dismiss your case so do not be scared into a plea bargain of any kind. He will not rule on your motion but pick out some technicality that was made by the prosecution or officer. After this you will have the equivalent of diplomatic immunity and will never even get a ticket. You can only be arrested for causing injury to another party. However, just file the same motion to dismiss because the court still has no jurisdiction.\n\n(Place the name of the court as per example\n\nTHE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS )\n\n \n\nMOTION TO DISMISS\n\n(Plaintiffs name here) Plaintiff\n\n VS Case number (number here)\n\n(Defendants name here) Defendant\n\nMotion to Dismiss.\n\nThe defendant moves the court to dismiss this case against for the following reasons.\n\n1. THE RESERVATION OF MY RIGHTS.\n\nI explicitly reserve all of my rights. UCC 1-308 which was formally UCC 1-207.\n\n§ 1-308. Performance or Acceptance Under Reservation of Rights.\n\n(a) A party that with explicit reservation of rights performs or promises performance or assents to\n\nperformance in a manner demanded or offered by the other party does not thereby prejudice\n\nthe rights reserved. Such words as “without prejudice,” “under protest,” or the like are\n\nsufficient.\n\n2. FURTHER ADVISEMENT\n\nThis is to advise that all of the actions of the court and all others in these cases against Defendant\n\nare in violation of …\n\nA. USC TITLE 18 > PART I > CHAPTER 13 > § 242 Deprivation of rights under color of law\n\nB. USC TITLE 18 > PART I > CHAPTER 13 > § 241 Conspiracy against rights\n\nWHEREFORE, Defendant prays for the foregoing speedy relief.\n\nKindest and warmest regards,\n\nSigned__________________________________________\n\nWithout prejudice UCC 1-308\n\nFrom the defendant: (Your name here)\n\nPhysical address\n\nMailing address\n\nPhone\n\n ",
"mediaType": "text/plain"
}
},
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/799286458014769159/entities/urn:activity:880640231776997376/activity"
},
{
"type": "Create",
"actor": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/799286458014769159",
"object": {
"type": "Note",
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/799286458014769159/entities/urn:activity:880640012697071616",
"attributedTo": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/799286458014769159",
"content": "Subject: Supreme Court cases supporting no license needed to practice law.<br /><br />If you ever get attacked for practicing law without a license.<br /><br />Reference Court Cases:<br /><br />* Picking v. Pennsylvania R. Co. 151 Fed. 2nd 240; Pucket v. Cox 456 2nd 233. Pro se pleadings are to be considered without regard to technicality; pro se litigants pleadings are not to be held to the same high standards of perfection as lawyers.<br /><br />1. Platsky v. C.I.A. 953 F.2d. 25. Additionally, pro se litigants are to be given reasonable opportunity to remedy the defects in their pleadings. Reynoldson v. Shillinger 907F .2d 124, 126 (10th Cir. 1990); See also Jaxon v. Circle K. Corp. 773 F.2d 1138, 1140 (10th Cir. 1985) (1)<br /><br />2. Haines v. Kerner (92 S.Ct. 594). The respondent in this action is a nonlawyer and is moving forward in Propria persona.<br /><br />3. NAACP v. Button (371 U.S. 415); United Mineworkers of America v. Gibbs (383 U.S. 715); and Johnson v. Avery 89 S. Ct. 747 (1969). Members of groups who are competent nonlawyers can assist other members of the group achieve the goals of the group in court without being charged with \"Unauthorized practice of law.\"<br /><br />4. Brotherhood of Trainmen v. Virginia ex rel. Virginia State Bar (377 U.S. 1); Gideon v. Wainwright 372 U.S. 335; Argersinger v. Hamlin, Sheriff 407 U.S. 425. Litigants may be assisted by unlicensed layman during judicial proceedings.<br /><br />5. Howlett v. Rose, 496 U.S. 356 (1990) Federal Law and Supreme Court Cases apply to State Court Cases<br /><br />6. Federal Rules Civil Proc., Rule 17, 28 U.S.C.A. \"Next Friend\" A next friend is a person who represents someone who is unable to tend to his or her own interest...<br /><br />7. Oklahoma Court Rules and Procedures, Title 12, sec. 2017 (C) \"If an infant or incompetent person does not have a duly appointed representative he may sue by his next friend or by a guardian ad litem.\"<br /><br />8. Mandonado-Denis v. Castillo-Rodriguez, 23 F.3d 576 (1st Cir. 1994) Inadequate training of subordinates may be basis for 1983 claim.<br /><br />9. Warnock v. Pecos County, Tex., 88 F3d 341 (5th Cir. 1996) Eleventh Amendment does not protect state officials from claims for prospective relief when it is alleged that state officials acted in violation of federal law.<br /><br />10. Title 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983, Wood v. Breier, 54 F.R.D. 7, 10-11 (E.D. Wis. 1972). Frankenhauser v. Rizzo, 59 F.R.D. 339 (E.D. Pa. 1973). \"Each citizen acts as a private attorney general who 'takes on the mantel of sovereign',\"<br /><br />11. Oklahoma is a \"Right to Work\" State! Bill SJR1! Its OK to practice God`s law with out a license, Luke 11:52, God`s Law was here first! \"There is a higher loyalty than loyalty to this country, loyalty to God\" U.S. v. Seeger, 380 U.S. 163, 172, 85 S. Ct. 850, 13 L. Ed. 2d 733 (1965)<br /><br />12. \"The practice of law can not be licensed by any state/State. Schware v. Board of Examiners, United States Reports 353 U.S. pgs. 238, 239. In Sims v. Aherns, 271 S.W. 720 (1925) \"The practice of law is an occupation of common right.\" A bar card is not a license, its a dues card and/or membership card. A bar association is that what it is, a club, An association is not license, it has a certificate through the State, the two are not the same....",
"to": [
"https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public"
],
"cc": [
"https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/799286458014769159/followers"
],
"tag": [],
"url": "https://www.minds.com/newsfeed/880640012697071616",
"published": "2018-08-27T02:29:00+00:00",
"source": {
"content": "Subject: Supreme Court cases supporting no license needed to practice law.\n\nIf you ever get attacked for practicing law without a license.\n\nReference Court Cases:\n\n* Picking v. Pennsylvania R. Co. 151 Fed. 2nd 240; Pucket v. Cox 456 2nd 233. Pro se pleadings are to be considered without regard to technicality; pro se litigants pleadings are not to be held to the same high standards of perfection as lawyers.\n\n1. Platsky v. C.I.A. 953 F.2d. 25. Additionally, pro se litigants are to be given reasonable opportunity to remedy the defects in their pleadings. Reynoldson v. Shillinger 907F .2d 124, 126 (10th Cir. 1990); See also Jaxon v. Circle K. Corp. 773 F.2d 1138, 1140 (10th Cir. 1985) (1)\n\n2. Haines v. Kerner (92 S.Ct. 594). The respondent in this action is a nonlawyer and is moving forward in Propria persona.\n\n3. NAACP v. Button (371 U.S. 415); United Mineworkers of America v. Gibbs (383 U.S. 715); and Johnson v. Avery 89 S. Ct. 747 (1969). Members of groups who are competent nonlawyers can assist other members of the group achieve the goals of the group in court without being charged with \"Unauthorized practice of law.\"\n\n4. Brotherhood of Trainmen v. Virginia ex rel. Virginia State Bar (377 U.S. 1); Gideon v. Wainwright 372 U.S. 335; Argersinger v. Hamlin, Sheriff 407 U.S. 425. Litigants may be assisted by unlicensed layman during judicial proceedings.\n\n5. Howlett v. Rose, 496 U.S. 356 (1990) Federal Law and Supreme Court Cases apply to State Court Cases\n\n6. Federal Rules Civil Proc., Rule 17, 28 U.S.C.A. \"Next Friend\" A next friend is a person who represents someone who is unable to tend to his or her own interest...\n\n7. Oklahoma Court Rules and Procedures, Title 12, sec. 2017 (C) \"If an infant or incompetent person does not have a duly appointed representative he may sue by his next friend or by a guardian ad litem.\"\n\n8. Mandonado-Denis v. Castillo-Rodriguez, 23 F.3d 576 (1st Cir. 1994) Inadequate training of subordinates may be basis for 1983 claim.\n\n9. Warnock v. Pecos County, Tex., 88 F3d 341 (5th Cir. 1996) Eleventh Amendment does not protect state officials from claims for prospective relief when it is alleged that state officials acted in violation of federal law.\n\n10. Title 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983, Wood v. Breier, 54 F.R.D. 7, 10-11 (E.D. Wis. 1972). Frankenhauser v. Rizzo, 59 F.R.D. 339 (E.D. Pa. 1973). \"Each citizen acts as a private attorney general who 'takes on the mantel of sovereign',\"\n\n11. Oklahoma is a \"Right to Work\" State! Bill SJR1! Its OK to practice God`s law with out a license, Luke 11:52, God`s Law was here first! \"There is a higher loyalty than loyalty to this country, loyalty to God\" U.S. v. Seeger, 380 U.S. 163, 172, 85 S. Ct. 850, 13 L. Ed. 2d 733 (1965)\n\n12. \"The practice of law can not be licensed by any state/State. Schware v. Board of Examiners, United States Reports 353 U.S. pgs. 238, 239. In Sims v. Aherns, 271 S.W. 720 (1925) \"The practice of law is an occupation of common right.\" A bar card is not a license, its a dues card and/or membership card. A bar association is that what it is, a club, An association is not license, it has a certificate through the State, the two are not the same....",
"mediaType": "text/plain"
}
},
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/799286458014769159/entities/urn:activity:880640012697071616/activity"
},
{
"type": "Create",
"actor": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/799286458014769159",
"object": {
"type": "Note",
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/799286458014769159/entities/urn:activity:880639846405500928",
"attributedTo": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/799286458014769159",
"content": "Hiding evidence is a criminal offense under the provisions of chapter 73 of the United States Code, titled \"Obstruction of Justice.\" Obstruction of justice covers a wide range of actions or inactions, including hiding evidence. State laws or codes may have slight variations in their interpretation and execution of this law, however, the basic tenets remain the same.<br />Overview<br /><br />Under the provisions of the United States Code, a person is guilty of the crime of obstruction of justice when he willfully attempts to interfere with the judicial system, law enforcement officers or the proper administration of the courts. Some examples of obstruction of justice include interfering with an arrest, engaging in unlawful conversations with witnesses and hiding evidence. An example of hiding evidence is any attempt by a prosecutor in a criminal case to try to withhold or hide unfavorable evidence that he is mandated to provide to the defense under the provisions of the law.<br /><br />Objective<br /><br />The main objective of the laws relating to obstruction of justice is to maintain and uphold the integrity of congressional and agency hearings, as well as federal judicial proceedings. In order to bring an action of hiding evidence, the state or federal government has to prove that there was indeed a pending or ongoing federal, state, judicial or administrative proceeding. Another burden of proof is to show that the accused was aware of such a proceeding and did indeed try to conceal evidence, as such obstructing or attempting to obstruct justice.<br /><br />Penalties<br /><br />Under the provisions of the United States code, any act of obstruction of justice, including hiding evidence, falls under the classification of a felony. This is a criminal offense punishable by a maximum sentence of 20 years in jail. State laws on obstruction of justice cases may be applied only if the case does not involve a federal official or federal court proceeding. For example, under Section 76-8-306 (c) of the Utah Code, hiding or concealing evidence is also considered obstruction of justice. It is divided into categories ranging from class A misdemeanor to third-degree felony depending on mitigating circumstances including whether the offender is a juvenile.<br /><br />Misprision of a Felony<br /><br />Misprision of a felony is another criminal offense that deals with the concealment of evidence. Misprision of a felony involves the failure to report a felony that someone knows about. This law is provided for under Title 18, Section 4 of the United States Code. This law applies to the public at large and is not contingent on any specific judicial or administrative procedure. For instance, anyone who knows that someone has committed a felony and fails to report it to a federal judge may be guilty of the offense of misprision of a felony.",
"to": [
"https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public"
],
"cc": [
"https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/799286458014769159/followers"
],
"tag": [],
"url": "https://www.minds.com/newsfeed/880639846405500928",
"published": "2018-08-27T02:28:20+00:00",
"source": {
"content": "Hiding evidence is a criminal offense under the provisions of chapter 73 of the United States Code, titled \"Obstruction of Justice.\" Obstruction of justice covers a wide range of actions or inactions, including hiding evidence. State laws or codes may have slight variations in their interpretation and execution of this law, however, the basic tenets remain the same.\nOverview\n\nUnder the provisions of the United States Code, a person is guilty of the crime of obstruction of justice when he willfully attempts to interfere with the judicial system, law enforcement officers or the proper administration of the courts. Some examples of obstruction of justice include interfering with an arrest, engaging in unlawful conversations with witnesses and hiding evidence. An example of hiding evidence is any attempt by a prosecutor in a criminal case to try to withhold or hide unfavorable evidence that he is mandated to provide to the defense under the provisions of the law.\n\nObjective\n\nThe main objective of the laws relating to obstruction of justice is to maintain and uphold the integrity of congressional and agency hearings, as well as federal judicial proceedings. In order to bring an action of hiding evidence, the state or federal government has to prove that there was indeed a pending or ongoing federal, state, judicial or administrative proceeding. Another burden of proof is to show that the accused was aware of such a proceeding and did indeed try to conceal evidence, as such obstructing or attempting to obstruct justice.\n\nPenalties\n\nUnder the provisions of the United States code, any act of obstruction of justice, including hiding evidence, falls under the classification of a felony. This is a criminal offense punishable by a maximum sentence of 20 years in jail. State laws on obstruction of justice cases may be applied only if the case does not involve a federal official or federal court proceeding. For example, under Section 76-8-306 (c) of the Utah Code, hiding or concealing evidence is also considered obstruction of justice. It is divided into categories ranging from class A misdemeanor to third-degree felony depending on mitigating circumstances including whether the offender is a juvenile.\n\nMisprision of a Felony\n\nMisprision of a felony is another criminal offense that deals with the concealment of evidence. Misprision of a felony involves the failure to report a felony that someone knows about. This law is provided for under Title 18, Section 4 of the United States Code. This law applies to the public at large and is not contingent on any specific judicial or administrative procedure. For instance, anyone who knows that someone has committed a felony and fails to report it to a federal judge may be guilty of the offense of misprision of a felony.",
"mediaType": "text/plain"
}
},
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/799286458014769159/entities/urn:activity:880639846405500928/activity"
},
{
"type": "Create",
"actor": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/799286458014769159",
"object": {
"type": "Note",
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/799286458014769159/entities/urn:activity:880639700124954624",
"attributedTo": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/799286458014769159",
"content": ".The Eleventh Amendment was not intended to afford them freedom from liability in any case where, under color of their office, they have injured one of the State's citizens. TO grant them such immunity would be to create a privileged class free from liability from wrongs inflicted or injuries threatened. Public Agents must be liable to the law, unless they are to be put above the law.see.OLD COLONY TRUST COMPANY v. CITY OF SEATTLE ET AL.{06/01/26} 271 U.S.426,46 S.Ct. 552,70 L.Ed.at page 431. no officer of the law may set that law at defiance with impunity see. United States v. lee,U.S. 196,220 and Burton v.United States 202 U.S. 344.<br /><br />\" the relevant cases that the factors determining whether an act by a judge is a \"judicial\" one relate to the nature of the act it self, i.e, whether it is a function normally performed by a judge, and the expectations of the parties,i.e, whether they dealt with the judge in his judicial capacity.\"435 U.S 349,362 { emphasis added}.<br /><br />some defendants urge that any acts \"of a judicial nature\" entitles the judge to absolute judicial immunity.But in a jurisdiction vaccum,{that is, absence of all jurisdiction}the second prong necessary to absolute judicial immunity is missing. Stump v.Sparkman,id.,435 U.S. 349.<br /><br /> Where there is no jurisdiction,there can be no discretion,for discretion is incident to jurisdiction. Piper v. Pearson,2 Gray 120,cited in Bradley v.Fisher,13 Wall. 335,20 L.ED. 646 {1872}<br /><br /> A judge must be acting within his jurisdiction as to subject matter and person,to be entitled to immunity from a civil action for his acts.Davis v. Burris, 51 Ariz.220,75 p.2nd 689 {1938}.<br /><br /> No man in this country is so high that he is above the law.No officer of the law may set that law at defiance with impunity.All the officers of the government from the highest to the lowest , are creatures of the law, and are bound to obey it.United States v. Lee, 106 U.S 196,220,1S.CT.240, 27 L.ED. 171 {1882<br />Buckles v. King County 191 F.3D 1127,*1133{C.A.9{WASH.},1999<br /><br /> Purpose of statute that mandated any person who under the color of law subjected another person to deprivation of his constitutional right's would be liable to the injured party in an action at law was not to abolish immunities that were available at common law,but to ensure that federal courts would have jurisdiction of constitutional claims against state officials.<br />Act March 3rd ,1875, 18 Stat. 470.<br />Butz v. Economou 438 U.S. 478, 98 S.Ct. 2894{U.S.N.Y,1978}",
"to": [
"https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public"
],
"cc": [
"https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/799286458014769159/followers"
],
"tag": [],
"url": "https://www.minds.com/newsfeed/880639700124954624",
"published": "2018-08-27T02:27:46+00:00",
"source": {
"content": ".The Eleventh Amendment was not intended to afford them freedom from liability in any case where, under color of their office, they have injured one of the State's citizens. TO grant them such immunity would be to create a privileged class free from liability from wrongs inflicted or injuries threatened. Public Agents must be liable to the law, unless they are to be put above the law.see.OLD COLONY TRUST COMPANY v. CITY OF SEATTLE ET AL.{06/01/26} 271 U.S.426,46 S.Ct. 552,70 L.Ed.at page 431. no officer of the law may set that law at defiance with impunity see. United States v. lee,U.S. 196,220 and Burton v.United States 202 U.S. 344.\n\n\" the relevant cases that the factors determining whether an act by a judge is a \"judicial\" one relate to the nature of the act it self, i.e, whether it is a function normally performed by a judge, and the expectations of the parties,i.e, whether they dealt with the judge in his judicial capacity.\"435 U.S 349,362 { emphasis added}.\n\nsome defendants urge that any acts \"of a judicial nature\" entitles the judge to absolute judicial immunity.But in a jurisdiction vaccum,{that is, absence of all jurisdiction}the second prong necessary to absolute judicial immunity is missing. Stump v.Sparkman,id.,435 U.S. 349.\n\n Where there is no jurisdiction,there can be no discretion,for discretion is incident to jurisdiction. Piper v. Pearson,2 Gray 120,cited in Bradley v.Fisher,13 Wall. 335,20 L.ED. 646 {1872}\n\n A judge must be acting within his jurisdiction as to subject matter and person,to be entitled to immunity from a civil action for his acts.Davis v. Burris, 51 Ariz.220,75 p.2nd 689 {1938}.\n\n No man in this country is so high that he is above the law.No officer of the law may set that law at defiance with impunity.All the officers of the government from the highest to the lowest , are creatures of the law, and are bound to obey it.United States v. Lee, 106 U.S 196,220,1S.CT.240, 27 L.ED. 171 {1882\nBuckles v. King County 191 F.3D 1127,*1133{C.A.9{WASH.},1999\n\n Purpose of statute that mandated any person who under the color of law subjected another person to deprivation of his constitutional right's would be liable to the injured party in an action at law was not to abolish immunities that were available at common law,but to ensure that federal courts would have jurisdiction of constitutional claims against state officials.\nAct March 3rd ,1875, 18 Stat. 470.\nButz v. Economou 438 U.S. 478, 98 S.Ct. 2894{U.S.N.Y,1978}",
"mediaType": "text/plain"
}
},
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/799286458014769159/entities/urn:activity:880639700124954624/activity"
},
{
"type": "Create",
"actor": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/799286458014769159",
"object": {
"type": "Note",
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/799286458014769159/entities/urn:activity:880628358873739264",
"attributedTo": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/799286458014769159",
"content": "You should not have any trouble with private plates on your car or automobile. It's in the Lieber Code and Laws of war, Public and Private (See ICRC Rule 51). Label your car with any of the following:<br /><br />-Not a Motor Vehicle <br />-Non-commercial <br />-Not a Driver <br />-Not for hire<br />-For consumer and household goods only, no nexus, no jurisdiction - <br /><br />See CVC 260, 17459, 17460 and 21052. The \"Code\" is for people who are employed to drive who obtained/retained drivers licenses, registration and certificates of ownership. Passenger vehicles not used for commerce are not commercial vehicles.<br /><br />A solution might be to fill out a DMV export form to remove the vehicle from ID-entity even if you use an registered ANC. At that point it, is outright theft of an unidentified car. <br /><br />With private placards on the front and back of your automobile, the 'State' has not any proprietary or monetary interest in your car/automobile. Absent a Contract with the BAR attorneys for the State DMV via the State Registration No. or Driver License No., what contract could be enforced against you in order to cause you a commercial/financial injury? How could an Agent for the oppressive State or corporate court official have a claim against you? No Registration = no joinder or nexus to the corporate State. For those in Iowa or various other states - look on the Driver License and see if somewhere it says; \"Non-Commercial Vehicle\".... Hmmmmm - very questionable from the start!<br /><br />---<br /><br />“Private property, unless forfeited by crimes or by offenses of the owner, can be seized only by way of military necessity, for the support or other benefit of the Army or of the United States.” — Part 38, of the Lieber Code<br />___________________________________________________",
"to": [
"https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public"
],
"cc": [
"https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/799286458014769159/followers"
],
"tag": [],
"url": "https://www.minds.com/newsfeed/880628358873739264",
"published": "2018-08-27T01:42:42+00:00",
"source": {
"content": "You should not have any trouble with private plates on your car or automobile. It's in the Lieber Code and Laws of war, Public and Private (See ICRC Rule 51). Label your car with any of the following:\n\n-Not a Motor Vehicle \n-Non-commercial \n-Not a Driver \n-Not for hire\n-For consumer and household goods only, no nexus, no jurisdiction - \n\nSee CVC 260, 17459, 17460 and 21052. The \"Code\" is for people who are employed to drive who obtained/retained drivers licenses, registration and certificates of ownership. Passenger vehicles not used for commerce are not commercial vehicles.\n\nA solution might be to fill out a DMV export form to remove the vehicle from ID-entity even if you use an registered ANC. At that point it, is outright theft of an unidentified car. \n\nWith private placards on the front and back of your automobile, the 'State' has not any proprietary or monetary interest in your car/automobile. Absent a Contract with the BAR attorneys for the State DMV via the State Registration No. or Driver License No., what contract could be enforced against you in order to cause you a commercial/financial injury? How could an Agent for the oppressive State or corporate court official have a claim against you? No Registration = no joinder or nexus to the corporate State. For those in Iowa or various other states - look on the Driver License and see if somewhere it says; \"Non-Commercial Vehicle\".... Hmmmmm - very questionable from the start!\n\n---\n\n“Private property, unless forfeited by crimes or by offenses of the owner, can be seized only by way of military necessity, for the support or other benefit of the Army or of the United States.” — Part 38, of the Lieber Code\n___________________________________________________",
"mediaType": "text/plain"
}
},
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/799286458014769159/entities/urn:activity:880628358873739264/activity"
},
{
"type": "Create",
"actor": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/799286458014769159",
"object": {
"type": "Note",
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/799286458014769159/entities/urn:activity:880620441617428480",
"attributedTo": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/799286458014769159",
"content": "The 'Cestui Que Vie' BIRTH CERTIFICATE TRUST:<br /><br />Claim the 'Cestui Que Vie' BIRTH CERTIFICATE TRUST account: <br />(This is hugely sensitive material, pay attention people!) <br /><br />(Title 31 U.S.Code 1321/1322), - Nationality Act, 1940 <br />& watch the Judge seemingly freak out when you bring this sensitive information to the table. Inform the Judge that you are the EXECUTOR of the trial, and the judge is the ADMINISTRATOR of the trial & publicly define the roles of the CQV trust.<br /><br />The judge is unlawfully attempting to access your TRUST & can do so only through your consent, by deceiving you into agreeing to let them assume improper roles which grant them authority. <br />(This is the unfortunate, corrupt reality that our peaceful, law abiding communities are dealing with in the court system today)<br /><br />Roles of the CESTUI QUE VIE TRUST:<br /><br />- YOU (THE LIVING MAN/WOMAN) = BENEFICIARY of the CQV Trust<br />- Judge = TRUSTEE of the CQV trust<br />- Clerk = ADMINISTRATOR of the CQV trust<br /><br />(Both Judge & Clerk must follow YOUR instructions for discharge / dismissal as YOU are the Executor of the trial and Beneficiary of the CQV trust.)<br /><br />- <a href=\"https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gQ0Y_jjlCTQ\" target=\"_blank\">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gQ0Y_jjlCTQ</a><br /><br />CESTA QUE TRUST<br /><br />The pseudo judges of these pseudo courts have NO powers without the consent of both the plaintiff and the defendant. (AND) In every case the Judge must determine that he has consent; personam and Subject Matter Jurisdiction before he can act or access the Cesta Que Trust.<br /><br />Note: All tradable Securities must be assigned a CUSIP NUMBER before it can be offered to investors. Birth Certificates and Social Security Applications are converted onto Government Securities; assigned a CUSIP NUMBER; grouped into lots and then are marketed as a Mutual Fund Investment. Upon maturity, the profits are moved into a GOVERNMENT CESTA QUE TRUST and if you are still alive, the certified documents are reinvested. It is the funds contained in this CESTA QUE TRUST that the Judge, Clerk, and County Prosecutor are really after or interested in! This Trust actually pays for all of your debts but nobody tells you that because the elite consider those assets to be their property and the Federal Reserve System is responsible for the management of those investments.<br /><br />Declaring Status Properly:<br /><br />I am here by Special Appearance, Sui Juris Autonomous en Personam, as the Belligerant Claimant in person.<br /><br />In addition, for the record, <br />* I am the Authorized Administrator and Executor of the CESTA QUE TRUST created under the all caps name “ROBERT Q EVANS”. You are the Trustee, State / Mr. Prosecutor & I do not consent to being surety for these proceedings. In addition, I demand the bond be immediately brought forward so I can see who will indemnify me if I am damaged.<br /><br />At your Arraignment or Trial, the Judge will ask you if you are the named individual [ALL CAPS BIRTYH MANE] on the complaint and your natural response will be to answer in the affirmative but that is exactly wat you don’t want to do!<br /><br />Remove your birth certificate and respond by stating: I am making Special Limited Appearance on behalf of the defendant who is right here [Hold up your Birth Certificate!]<br />Then State the following:<br /><br />As I understand the process Judge; the county attorney or Police Officer has leveled a criminal charge with the Clerk against the TRUST, using the ALL CAPS NAME that appears on this BIRTH CERTIFICATE! The use of capital letters is dictated by the US Printing Style Manuel, which explains how to identify a CORPORATION.<br /><br />THE Clerk, who is the ADMINISTRATOR of the CESTA QUE TRUST , then, appointed you Judge as the TRUSTEE for the TRUST and since neither of you can be the BENEFICIARY, that leaves me and therefore you are MY TRUSTEE!<br /><br />So as MY TRUSTEE, I instruct you to discharge this entire matter with prejudice and award the penalties for these crimes to be paid to me in compensation and damages for my false arrest!<br />Note: The Law Of Trusts dictates that an Administrator; Trustee and Beneficiary cannot serve two positions in a Trust. So a Trustee cannot be a Beneficiary too.<br /><br />***The TRUSTEE Judge has no alternative but to honor your demands but you have to get this right and act with confidence. You really need to know this information well, so that you can’t be hoodwinked or confused by either of them! They will or may attempt to play some mind games with you if you display any doubt; stammer or display a lack of confidence. Appearances of the Pseudo courts is totally for your benefit and is intended to invoke fear and intimidation. If you show fear or intimidation, you get a pony ride.<br /><br />The Supreme Court has warned, \"Because of what appear to be Lawful commands on the surface, many citizens, because of their respect for what appears to be law, are cunningly coerced into waiving their rights, due to ignorance.\" (U.S. v. Minker, 350 U.S. 179, 187),<br /><br />\"the powers that be\" that you are alive and claim the Cestui Que BIRTH CERTIFICATE TRUST account, (Title 31 U.S. Code 1321/1322), is what we are supposed to do too. - Nationality Act, 1940.<br /><br />#2) How to avoid prosecution under the Trust, when a Sovereign is taken before a corporate prosecuting Attorney or a Judge:<br /><br />First: the Sovereign must inquire if we are on the record, and if not, insist upon it! <br />Say nothing, sign nothing and answer no questions until you are convinced that the proceedings are being recorded!<br /><br />Secondly: all a Sovereign has to say for the record is: “I am a beneficiary of the Trust, and I am appointing you as my Trustee!”<br /><br />Thirdly: the Sovereign then directs his Trustee to do his bidding! “As my Trustee, I instruct you to discharge this matter I am accused of and eliminate the record!”<br /><br />Fourthly: if the Sovereign suffered any damages as a result of his arrest, he can direct that the Trust compensate him from the proceeds of the Court by saying; “I wish to be compensated for [X] dollars, in redemption.” This statement is sufficient to remove the authority and jurisdiction from any prosecuting attorney or judge. The accused will be immediately released from custody, with a check, license or claim he identifies as a damage. It doesn’t matter what the action involves or how it is classified by the corporate law as a civil or criminal action!",
"to": [
"https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public"
],
"cc": [
"https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/799286458014769159/followers"
],
"tag": [],
"url": "https://www.minds.com/newsfeed/880620441617428480",
"published": "2018-08-27T01:11:14+00:00",
"source": {
"content": "The 'Cestui Que Vie' BIRTH CERTIFICATE TRUST:\n\nClaim the 'Cestui Que Vie' BIRTH CERTIFICATE TRUST account: \n(This is hugely sensitive material, pay attention people!) \n\n(Title 31 U.S.Code 1321/1322), - Nationality Act, 1940 \n& watch the Judge seemingly freak out when you bring this sensitive information to the table. Inform the Judge that you are the EXECUTOR of the trial, and the judge is the ADMINISTRATOR of the trial & publicly define the roles of the CQV trust.\n\nThe judge is unlawfully attempting to access your TRUST & can do so only through your consent, by deceiving you into agreeing to let them assume improper roles which grant them authority. \n(This is the unfortunate, corrupt reality that our peaceful, law abiding communities are dealing with in the court system today)\n\nRoles of the CESTUI QUE VIE TRUST:\n\n- YOU (THE LIVING MAN/WOMAN) = BENEFICIARY of the CQV Trust\n- Judge = TRUSTEE of the CQV trust\n- Clerk = ADMINISTRATOR of the CQV trust\n\n(Both Judge & Clerk must follow YOUR instructions for discharge / dismissal as YOU are the Executor of the trial and Beneficiary of the CQV trust.)\n\n- https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gQ0Y_jjlCTQ\n\nCESTA QUE TRUST\n\nThe pseudo judges of these pseudo courts have NO powers without the consent of both the plaintiff and the defendant. (AND) In every case the Judge must determine that he has consent; personam and Subject Matter Jurisdiction before he can act or access the Cesta Que Trust.\n\nNote: All tradable Securities must be assigned a CUSIP NUMBER before it can be offered to investors. Birth Certificates and Social Security Applications are converted onto Government Securities; assigned a CUSIP NUMBER; grouped into lots and then are marketed as a Mutual Fund Investment. Upon maturity, the profits are moved into a GOVERNMENT CESTA QUE TRUST and if you are still alive, the certified documents are reinvested. It is the funds contained in this CESTA QUE TRUST that the Judge, Clerk, and County Prosecutor are really after or interested in! This Trust actually pays for all of your debts but nobody tells you that because the elite consider those assets to be their property and the Federal Reserve System is responsible for the management of those investments.\n\nDeclaring Status Properly:\n\nI am here by Special Appearance, Sui Juris Autonomous en Personam, as the Belligerant Claimant in person.\n\nIn addition, for the record, \n* I am the Authorized Administrator and Executor of the CESTA QUE TRUST created under the all caps name “ROBERT Q EVANS”. You are the Trustee, State / Mr. Prosecutor & I do not consent to being surety for these proceedings. In addition, I demand the bond be immediately brought forward so I can see who will indemnify me if I am damaged.\n\nAt your Arraignment or Trial, the Judge will ask you if you are the named individual [ALL CAPS BIRTYH MANE] on the complaint and your natural response will be to answer in the affirmative but that is exactly wat you don’t want to do!\n\nRemove your birth certificate and respond by stating: I am making Special Limited Appearance on behalf of the defendant who is right here [Hold up your Birth Certificate!]\nThen State the following:\n\nAs I understand the process Judge; the county attorney or Police Officer has leveled a criminal charge with the Clerk against the TRUST, using the ALL CAPS NAME that appears on this BIRTH CERTIFICATE! The use of capital letters is dictated by the US Printing Style Manuel, which explains how to identify a CORPORATION.\n\nTHE Clerk, who is the ADMINISTRATOR of the CESTA QUE TRUST , then, appointed you Judge as the TRUSTEE for the TRUST and since neither of you can be the BENEFICIARY, that leaves me and therefore you are MY TRUSTEE!\n\nSo as MY TRUSTEE, I instruct you to discharge this entire matter with prejudice and award the penalties for these crimes to be paid to me in compensation and damages for my false arrest!\nNote: The Law Of Trusts dictates that an Administrator; Trustee and Beneficiary cannot serve two positions in a Trust. So a Trustee cannot be a Beneficiary too.\n\n***The TRUSTEE Judge has no alternative but to honor your demands but you have to get this right and act with confidence. You really need to know this information well, so that you can’t be hoodwinked or confused by either of them! They will or may attempt to play some mind games with you if you display any doubt; stammer or display a lack of confidence. Appearances of the Pseudo courts is totally for your benefit and is intended to invoke fear and intimidation. If you show fear or intimidation, you get a pony ride.\n\nThe Supreme Court has warned, \"Because of what appear to be Lawful commands on the surface, many citizens, because of their respect for what appears to be law, are cunningly coerced into waiving their rights, due to ignorance.\" (U.S. v. Minker, 350 U.S. 179, 187),\n\n\"the powers that be\" that you are alive and claim the Cestui Que BIRTH CERTIFICATE TRUST account, (Title 31 U.S. Code 1321/1322), is what we are supposed to do too. - Nationality Act, 1940.\n\n#2) How to avoid prosecution under the Trust, when a Sovereign is taken before a corporate prosecuting Attorney or a Judge:\n\nFirst: the Sovereign must inquire if we are on the record, and if not, insist upon it! \nSay nothing, sign nothing and answer no questions until you are convinced that the proceedings are being recorded!\n\nSecondly: all a Sovereign has to say for the record is: “I am a beneficiary of the Trust, and I am appointing you as my Trustee!”\n\nThirdly: the Sovereign then directs his Trustee to do his bidding! “As my Trustee, I instruct you to discharge this matter I am accused of and eliminate the record!”\n\nFourthly: if the Sovereign suffered any damages as a result of his arrest, he can direct that the Trust compensate him from the proceeds of the Court by saying; “I wish to be compensated for [X] dollars, in redemption.” This statement is sufficient to remove the authority and jurisdiction from any prosecuting attorney or judge. The accused will be immediately released from custody, with a check, license or claim he identifies as a damage. It doesn’t matter what the action involves or how it is classified by the corporate law as a civil or criminal action!",
"mediaType": "text/plain"
}
},
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/799286458014769159/entities/urn:activity:880620441617428480/activity"
},
{
"type": "Create",
"actor": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/799286458014769159",
"object": {
"type": "Note",
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/799286458014769159/entities/urn:activity:880620250178875392",
"attributedTo": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/799286458014769159",
"content": "The 'Cestui Que Vie' BIRTH CERTIFICATE TRUST:<br /><br />Claim the 'Cestui Que Vie' BIRTH CERTIFICATE TRUST account: <br />(This is hugely sensitive material, pay attention people!) <br /><br />(Title 31 U.S.Code 1321/1322), - Nationality Act, 1940 <br />& watch the Judge seemingly freak out when you bring this sensitive information to the table. Inform the Judge that you are the EXECUTOR of the trial, and the judge is the ADMINISTRATOR of the trial & publicly define the roles of the CQV trust.<br /><br />The judge is unlawfully attempting to access your TRUST & can do so only through your consent, by deceiving you into agreeing to let them assume improper roles which grant them authority. <br />(This is the unfortunate, corrupt reality that our peaceful, law abiding communities are dealing with in the court system today)<br /><br />Roles of the CESTUI QUE VIE TRUST:<br /><br />- YOU (THE LIVING MAN/WOMAN) = BENEFICIARY of the CQV Trust<br />- Judge = TRUSTEE of the CQV trust<br />- Clerk = ADMINISTRATOR of the CQV trust<br /><br />(Both Judge & Clerk must follow YOUR instructions for discharge / dismissal as YOU are the Executor of the trial and Beneficiary of the CQV trust.)<br /><br />- <a href=\"https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gQ0Y_jjlCTQ\" target=\"_blank\">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gQ0Y_jjlCTQ</a><br /><br />CESTA QUE TRUST<br /><br />The pseudo judges of these pseudo courts have NO powers without the consent of both the plaintiff and the defendant. (AND) In every case the Judge must determine that he has consent; personam and Subject Matter Jurisdiction before he can act or access the Cesta Que Trust.<br /><br />Note: All tradable Securities must be assigned a CUSIP NUMBER before it can be offered to investors. Birth Certificates and Social Security Applications are converted onto Government Securities; assigned a CUSIP NUMBER; grouped into lots and then are marketed as a Mutual Fund Investment. Upon maturity, the profits are moved into a GOVERNMENT CESTA QUE TRUST and if you are still alive, the certified documents are reinvested. It is the funds contained in this CESTA QUE TRUST that the Judge, Clerk, and County Prosecutor are really after or interested in! This Trust actually pays for all of your debts but nobody tells you that because the elite consider those assets to be their property and the Federal Reserve System is responsible for the management of those investments.<br /><br />Declaring Status Properly:<br /><br />I am here by Special Appearance, Sui Juris Autonomous en Personam, as the Belligerant Claimant in person.<br /><br />In addition, for the record, <br />* I am the Authorized Administrator and Executor of the CESTA QUE TRUST created under the all caps name “ROBERT Q EVANS”. You are the Trustee, State / Mr. Prosecutor & I do not consent to being surety for these proceedings. In addition, I demand the bond be immediately brought forward so I can see who will indemnify me if I am damaged.<br /><br />At your Arraignment or Trial, the Judge will ask you if you are the named individual [ALL CAPS BIRTYH MANE] on the complaint and your natural response will be to answer in the affirmative but that is exactly wat you don’t want to do!<br /><br />Remove your birth certificate and respond by stating: I am making Special Limited Appearance on behalf of the defendant who is right here [Hold up your Birth Certificate!]<br />Then State the following:<br /><br />As I understand the process Judge; the county attorney or Police Officer has leveled a criminal charge with the Clerk against the TRUST, using the ALL CAPS NAME that appears on this BIRTH CERTIFICATE! The use of capital letters is dictated by the US Printing Style Manuel, which explains how to identify a CORPORATION.<br /><br />THE Clerk, who is the ADMINISTRATOR of the CESTA QUE TRUST , then, appointed you Judge as the TRUSTEE for the TRUST and since neither of you can be the BENEFICIARY, that leaves me and therefore you are MY TRUSTEE!<br /><br />So as MY TRUSTEE, I instruct you to discharge this entire matter with prejudice and award the penalties for these crimes to be paid to me in compensation and damages for my false arrest!<br />Note: The Law Of Trusts dictates that an Administrator; Trustee and Beneficiary cannot serve two positions in a Trust. So a Trustee cannot be a Beneficiary too.<br /><br />***The TRUSTEE Judge has no alternative but to honor your demands but you have to get this right and act with confidence. You really need to know this information well, so that you can’t be hoodwinked or confused by either of them! They will or may attempt to play some mind games with you if you display any doubt; stammer or display a lack of confidence. Appearances of the Pseudo courts is totally for your benefit and is intended to invoke fear and intimidation. If you show fear or intimidation, you get a pony ride.<br /><br />The Supreme Court has warned, \"Because of what appear to be Lawful commands on the surface, many citizens, because of their respect for what appears to be law, are cunningly coerced into waiving their rights, due to ignorance.\" (U.S. v. Minker, 350 U.S. 179, 187),<br /><br />\"the powers that be\" that you are alive and claim the Cestui Que BIRTH CERTIFICATE TRUST account, (Title 31 U.S. Code 1321/1322), is what we are supposed to do too. - Nationality Act, 1940.<br /><br />#2) How to avoid prosecution under the Trust, when a Sovereign is taken before a corporate prosecuting Attorney or a Judge:<br /><br />First: the Sovereign must inquire if we are on the record, and if not, insist upon it! <br />Say nothing, sign nothing and answer no questions until you are convinced that the proceedings are being recorded!<br /><br />Secondly: all a Sovereign has to say for the record is: “I am a beneficiary of the Trust, and I am appointing you as my Trustee!”<br /><br />Thirdly: the Sovereign then directs his Trustee to do his bidding! “As my Trustee, I instruct you to discharge this matter I am accused of and eliminate the record!”<br /><br />Fourthly: if the Sovereign suffered any damages as a result of his arrest, he can direct that the Trust compensate him from the proceeds of the Court by saying; “I wish to be compensated for [X] dollars, in redemption.” This statement is sufficient to remove the authority and jurisdiction from any prosecuting attorney or judge. The accused will be immediately released from custody, with a check, license or claim he identifies as a damage. It doesn’t matter what the action involves or how it is classified by the corporate law as a civil or criminal action!",
"to": [
"https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public"
],
"cc": [
"https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/799286458014769159/followers"
],
"tag": [],
"url": "https://www.minds.com/newsfeed/880620250178875392",
"published": "2018-08-27T01:10:28+00:00",
"source": {
"content": "The 'Cestui Que Vie' BIRTH CERTIFICATE TRUST:\n\nClaim the 'Cestui Que Vie' BIRTH CERTIFICATE TRUST account: \n(This is hugely sensitive material, pay attention people!) \n\n(Title 31 U.S.Code 1321/1322), - Nationality Act, 1940 \n& watch the Judge seemingly freak out when you bring this sensitive information to the table. Inform the Judge that you are the EXECUTOR of the trial, and the judge is the ADMINISTRATOR of the trial & publicly define the roles of the CQV trust.\n\nThe judge is unlawfully attempting to access your TRUST & can do so only through your consent, by deceiving you into agreeing to let them assume improper roles which grant them authority. \n(This is the unfortunate, corrupt reality that our peaceful, law abiding communities are dealing with in the court system today)\n\nRoles of the CESTUI QUE VIE TRUST:\n\n- YOU (THE LIVING MAN/WOMAN) = BENEFICIARY of the CQV Trust\n- Judge = TRUSTEE of the CQV trust\n- Clerk = ADMINISTRATOR of the CQV trust\n\n(Both Judge & Clerk must follow YOUR instructions for discharge / dismissal as YOU are the Executor of the trial and Beneficiary of the CQV trust.)\n\n- https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gQ0Y_jjlCTQ\n\nCESTA QUE TRUST\n\nThe pseudo judges of these pseudo courts have NO powers without the consent of both the plaintiff and the defendant. (AND) In every case the Judge must determine that he has consent; personam and Subject Matter Jurisdiction before he can act or access the Cesta Que Trust.\n\nNote: All tradable Securities must be assigned a CUSIP NUMBER before it can be offered to investors. Birth Certificates and Social Security Applications are converted onto Government Securities; assigned a CUSIP NUMBER; grouped into lots and then are marketed as a Mutual Fund Investment. Upon maturity, the profits are moved into a GOVERNMENT CESTA QUE TRUST and if you are still alive, the certified documents are reinvested. It is the funds contained in this CESTA QUE TRUST that the Judge, Clerk, and County Prosecutor are really after or interested in! This Trust actually pays for all of your debts but nobody tells you that because the elite consider those assets to be their property and the Federal Reserve System is responsible for the management of those investments.\n\nDeclaring Status Properly:\n\nI am here by Special Appearance, Sui Juris Autonomous en Personam, as the Belligerant Claimant in person.\n\nIn addition, for the record, \n* I am the Authorized Administrator and Executor of the CESTA QUE TRUST created under the all caps name “ROBERT Q EVANS”. You are the Trustee, State / Mr. Prosecutor & I do not consent to being surety for these proceedings. In addition, I demand the bond be immediately brought forward so I can see who will indemnify me if I am damaged.\n\nAt your Arraignment or Trial, the Judge will ask you if you are the named individual [ALL CAPS BIRTYH MANE] on the complaint and your natural response will be to answer in the affirmative but that is exactly wat you don’t want to do!\n\nRemove your birth certificate and respond by stating: I am making Special Limited Appearance on behalf of the defendant who is right here [Hold up your Birth Certificate!]\nThen State the following:\n\nAs I understand the process Judge; the county attorney or Police Officer has leveled a criminal charge with the Clerk against the TRUST, using the ALL CAPS NAME that appears on this BIRTH CERTIFICATE! The use of capital letters is dictated by the US Printing Style Manuel, which explains how to identify a CORPORATION.\n\nTHE Clerk, who is the ADMINISTRATOR of the CESTA QUE TRUST , then, appointed you Judge as the TRUSTEE for the TRUST and since neither of you can be the BENEFICIARY, that leaves me and therefore you are MY TRUSTEE!\n\nSo as MY TRUSTEE, I instruct you to discharge this entire matter with prejudice and award the penalties for these crimes to be paid to me in compensation and damages for my false arrest!\nNote: The Law Of Trusts dictates that an Administrator; Trustee and Beneficiary cannot serve two positions in a Trust. So a Trustee cannot be a Beneficiary too.\n\n***The TRUSTEE Judge has no alternative but to honor your demands but you have to get this right and act with confidence. You really need to know this information well, so that you can’t be hoodwinked or confused by either of them! They will or may attempt to play some mind games with you if you display any doubt; stammer or display a lack of confidence. Appearances of the Pseudo courts is totally for your benefit and is intended to invoke fear and intimidation. If you show fear or intimidation, you get a pony ride.\n\nThe Supreme Court has warned, \"Because of what appear to be Lawful commands on the surface, many citizens, because of their respect for what appears to be law, are cunningly coerced into waiving their rights, due to ignorance.\" (U.S. v. Minker, 350 U.S. 179, 187),\n\n\"the powers that be\" that you are alive and claim the Cestui Que BIRTH CERTIFICATE TRUST account, (Title 31 U.S. Code 1321/1322), is what we are supposed to do too. - Nationality Act, 1940.\n\n#2) How to avoid prosecution under the Trust, when a Sovereign is taken before a corporate prosecuting Attorney or a Judge:\n\nFirst: the Sovereign must inquire if we are on the record, and if not, insist upon it! \nSay nothing, sign nothing and answer no questions until you are convinced that the proceedings are being recorded!\n\nSecondly: all a Sovereign has to say for the record is: “I am a beneficiary of the Trust, and I am appointing you as my Trustee!”\n\nThirdly: the Sovereign then directs his Trustee to do his bidding! “As my Trustee, I instruct you to discharge this matter I am accused of and eliminate the record!”\n\nFourthly: if the Sovereign suffered any damages as a result of his arrest, he can direct that the Trust compensate him from the proceeds of the Court by saying; “I wish to be compensated for [X] dollars, in redemption.” This statement is sufficient to remove the authority and jurisdiction from any prosecuting attorney or judge. The accused will be immediately released from custody, with a check, license or claim he identifies as a damage. It doesn’t matter what the action involves or how it is classified by the corporate law as a civil or criminal action!",
"mediaType": "text/plain"
}
},
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/799286458014769159/entities/urn:activity:880620250178875392/activity"
},
{
"type": "Create",
"actor": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/799286458014769159",
"object": {
"type": "Note",
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/799286458014769159/entities/urn:activity:880620166257176576",
"attributedTo": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/799286458014769159",
"content": "The 'Cestui Que Vie' BIRTH CERTIFICATE TRUST:<br /><br />Claim the 'Cestui Que Vie' BIRTH CERTIFICATE TRUST account: <br />(This is hugely sensitive material, pay attention people!) <br /><br />(Title 31 U.S.Code 1321/1322), - Nationality Act, 1940 <br />& watch the Judge seemingly freak out when you bring this sensitive information to the table. Inform the Judge that you are the EXECUTOR of the trial, and the judge is the ADMINISTRATOR of the trial & publicly define the roles of the CQV trust.<br /><br />The judge is unlawfully attempting to access your TRUST & can do so only through your consent, by deceiving you into agreeing to let them assume improper roles which grant them authority. <br />(This is the unfortunate, corrupt reality that our peaceful, law abiding communities are dealing with in the court system today)<br /><br />Roles of the CESTUI QUE VIE TRUST:<br /><br />- YOU (THE LIVING MAN/WOMAN) = BENEFICIARY of the CQV Trust<br />- Judge = TRUSTEE of the CQV trust<br />- Clerk = ADMINISTRATOR of the CQV trust<br /><br />(Both Judge & Clerk must follow YOUR instructions for discharge / dismissal as YOU are the Executor of the trial and Beneficiary of the CQV trust.)<br /><br />- <a href=\"https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gQ0Y_jjlCTQ\" target=\"_blank\">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gQ0Y_jjlCTQ</a><br /><br />CESTA QUE TRUST<br /><br />The pseudo judges of these pseudo courts have NO powers without the consent of both the plaintiff and the defendant. (AND) In every case the Judge must determine that he has consent; personam and Subject Matter Jurisdiction before he can act or access the Cesta Que Trust.<br /><br />Note: All tradable Securities must be assigned a CUSIP NUMBER before it can be offered to investors. Birth Certificates and Social Security Applications are converted onto Government Securities; assigned a CUSIP NUMBER; grouped into lots and then are marketed as a Mutual Fund Investment. Upon maturity, the profits are moved into a GOVERNMENT CESTA QUE TRUST and if you are still alive, the certified documents are reinvested. It is the funds contained in this CESTA QUE TRUST that the Judge, Clerk, and County Prosecutor are really after or interested in! This Trust actually pays for all of your debts but nobody tells you that because the elite consider those assets to be their property and the Federal Reserve System is responsible for the management of those investments.<br /><br />Declaring Status Properly:<br /><br />I am here by Special Appearance, Sui Juris Autonomous en Personam, as the Belligerant Claimant in person.<br /><br />In addition, for the record, <br />* I am the Authorized Administrator and Executor of the CESTA QUE TRUST created under the all caps name “ROBERT Q EVANS”. You are the Trustee, State / Mr. Prosecutor & I do not consent to being surety for these proceedings. In addition, I demand the bond be immediately brought forward so I can see who will indemnify me if I am damaged.<br /><br />At your Arraignment or Trial, the Judge will ask you if you are the named individual [ALL CAPS BIRTYH MANE] on the complaint and your natural response will be to answer in the affirmative but that is exactly wat you don’t want to do!<br /><br />Remove your birth certificate and respond by stating: I am making Special Limited Appearance on behalf of the defendant who is right here [Hold up your Birth Certificate!]<br />Then State the following:<br /><br />As I understand the process Judge; the county attorney or Police Officer has leveled a criminal charge with the Clerk against the TRUST, using the ALL CAPS NAME that appears on this BIRTH CERTIFICATE! The use of capital letters is dictated by the US Printing Style Manuel, which explains how to identify a CORPORATION.<br /><br />THE Clerk, who is the ADMINISTRATOR of the CESTA QUE TRUST , then, appointed you Judge as the TRUSTEE for the TRUST and since neither of you can be the BENEFICIARY, that leaves me and therefore you are MY TRUSTEE!<br /><br />So as MY TRUSTEE, I instruct you to discharge this entire matter with prejudice and award the penalties for these crimes to be paid to me in compensation and damages for my false arrest!<br />Note: The Law Of Trusts dictates that an Administrator; Trustee and Beneficiary cannot serve two positions in a Trust. So a Trustee cannot be a Beneficiary too.<br /><br />***The TRUSTEE Judge has no alternative but to honor your demands but you have to get this right and act with confidence. You really need to know this information well, so that you can’t be hoodwinked or confused by either of them! They will or may attempt to play some mind games with you if you display any doubt; stammer or display a lack of confidence. Appearances of the Pseudo courts is totally for your benefit and is intended to invoke fear and intimidation. If you show fear or intimidation, you get a pony ride.<br /><br />The Supreme Court has warned, \"Because of what appear to be Lawful commands on the surface, many citizens, because of their respect for what appears to be law, are cunningly coerced into waiving their rights, due to ignorance.\" (U.S. v. Minker, 350 U.S. 179, 187),<br /><br />\"the powers that be\" that you are alive and claim the Cestui Que BIRTH CERTIFICATE TRUST account, (Title 31 U.S. Code 1321/1322), is what we are supposed to do too. - Nationality Act, 1940.<br /><br />#2) How to avoid prosecution under the Trust, when a Sovereign is taken before a corporate prosecuting Attorney or a Judge:<br /><br />First: the Sovereign must inquire if we are on the record, and if not, insist upon it! <br />Say nothing, sign nothing and answer no questions until you are convinced that the proceedings are being recorded!<br /><br />Secondly: all a Sovereign has to say for the record is: “I am a beneficiary of the Trust, and I am appointing you as my Trustee!”<br /><br />Thirdly: the Sovereign then directs his Trustee to do his bidding! “As my Trustee, I instruct you to discharge this matter I am accused of and eliminate the record!”<br /><br />Fourthly: if the Sovereign suffered any damages as a result of his arrest, he can direct that the Trust compensate him from the proceeds of the Court by saying; “I wish to be compensated for [X] dollars, in redemption.” This statement is sufficient to remove the authority and jurisdiction from any prosecuting attorney or judge. The accused will be immediately released from custody, with a check, license or claim he identifies as a damage. It doesn’t matter what the action involves or how it is classified by the corporate law as a civil or criminal action!",
"to": [
"https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public"
],
"cc": [
"https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/799286458014769159/followers"
],
"tag": [],
"url": "https://www.minds.com/newsfeed/880620166257176576",
"published": "2018-08-27T01:10:08+00:00",
"source": {
"content": "The 'Cestui Que Vie' BIRTH CERTIFICATE TRUST:\n\nClaim the 'Cestui Que Vie' BIRTH CERTIFICATE TRUST account: \n(This is hugely sensitive material, pay attention people!) \n\n(Title 31 U.S.Code 1321/1322), - Nationality Act, 1940 \n& watch the Judge seemingly freak out when you bring this sensitive information to the table. Inform the Judge that you are the EXECUTOR of the trial, and the judge is the ADMINISTRATOR of the trial & publicly define the roles of the CQV trust.\n\nThe judge is unlawfully attempting to access your TRUST & can do so only through your consent, by deceiving you into agreeing to let them assume improper roles which grant them authority. \n(This is the unfortunate, corrupt reality that our peaceful, law abiding communities are dealing with in the court system today)\n\nRoles of the CESTUI QUE VIE TRUST:\n\n- YOU (THE LIVING MAN/WOMAN) = BENEFICIARY of the CQV Trust\n- Judge = TRUSTEE of the CQV trust\n- Clerk = ADMINISTRATOR of the CQV trust\n\n(Both Judge & Clerk must follow YOUR instructions for discharge / dismissal as YOU are the Executor of the trial and Beneficiary of the CQV trust.)\n\n- https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gQ0Y_jjlCTQ\n\nCESTA QUE TRUST\n\nThe pseudo judges of these pseudo courts have NO powers without the consent of both the plaintiff and the defendant. (AND) In every case the Judge must determine that he has consent; personam and Subject Matter Jurisdiction before he can act or access the Cesta Que Trust.\n\nNote: All tradable Securities must be assigned a CUSIP NUMBER before it can be offered to investors. Birth Certificates and Social Security Applications are converted onto Government Securities; assigned a CUSIP NUMBER; grouped into lots and then are marketed as a Mutual Fund Investment. Upon maturity, the profits are moved into a GOVERNMENT CESTA QUE TRUST and if you are still alive, the certified documents are reinvested. It is the funds contained in this CESTA QUE TRUST that the Judge, Clerk, and County Prosecutor are really after or interested in! This Trust actually pays for all of your debts but nobody tells you that because the elite consider those assets to be their property and the Federal Reserve System is responsible for the management of those investments.\n\nDeclaring Status Properly:\n\nI am here by Special Appearance, Sui Juris Autonomous en Personam, as the Belligerant Claimant in person.\n\nIn addition, for the record, \n* I am the Authorized Administrator and Executor of the CESTA QUE TRUST created under the all caps name “ROBERT Q EVANS”. You are the Trustee, State / Mr. Prosecutor & I do not consent to being surety for these proceedings. In addition, I demand the bond be immediately brought forward so I can see who will indemnify me if I am damaged.\n\nAt your Arraignment or Trial, the Judge will ask you if you are the named individual [ALL CAPS BIRTYH MANE] on the complaint and your natural response will be to answer in the affirmative but that is exactly wat you don’t want to do!\n\nRemove your birth certificate and respond by stating: I am making Special Limited Appearance on behalf of the defendant who is right here [Hold up your Birth Certificate!]\nThen State the following:\n\nAs I understand the process Judge; the county attorney or Police Officer has leveled a criminal charge with the Clerk against the TRUST, using the ALL CAPS NAME that appears on this BIRTH CERTIFICATE! The use of capital letters is dictated by the US Printing Style Manuel, which explains how to identify a CORPORATION.\n\nTHE Clerk, who is the ADMINISTRATOR of the CESTA QUE TRUST , then, appointed you Judge as the TRUSTEE for the TRUST and since neither of you can be the BENEFICIARY, that leaves me and therefore you are MY TRUSTEE!\n\nSo as MY TRUSTEE, I instruct you to discharge this entire matter with prejudice and award the penalties for these crimes to be paid to me in compensation and damages for my false arrest!\nNote: The Law Of Trusts dictates that an Administrator; Trustee and Beneficiary cannot serve two positions in a Trust. So a Trustee cannot be a Beneficiary too.\n\n***The TRUSTEE Judge has no alternative but to honor your demands but you have to get this right and act with confidence. You really need to know this information well, so that you can’t be hoodwinked or confused by either of them! They will or may attempt to play some mind games with you if you display any doubt; stammer or display a lack of confidence. Appearances of the Pseudo courts is totally for your benefit and is intended to invoke fear and intimidation. If you show fear or intimidation, you get a pony ride.\n\nThe Supreme Court has warned, \"Because of what appear to be Lawful commands on the surface, many citizens, because of their respect for what appears to be law, are cunningly coerced into waiving their rights, due to ignorance.\" (U.S. v. Minker, 350 U.S. 179, 187),\n\n\"the powers that be\" that you are alive and claim the Cestui Que BIRTH CERTIFICATE TRUST account, (Title 31 U.S. Code 1321/1322), is what we are supposed to do too. - Nationality Act, 1940.\n\n#2) How to avoid prosecution under the Trust, when a Sovereign is taken before a corporate prosecuting Attorney or a Judge:\n\nFirst: the Sovereign must inquire if we are on the record, and if not, insist upon it! \nSay nothing, sign nothing and answer no questions until you are convinced that the proceedings are being recorded!\n\nSecondly: all a Sovereign has to say for the record is: “I am a beneficiary of the Trust, and I am appointing you as my Trustee!”\n\nThirdly: the Sovereign then directs his Trustee to do his bidding! “As my Trustee, I instruct you to discharge this matter I am accused of and eliminate the record!”\n\nFourthly: if the Sovereign suffered any damages as a result of his arrest, he can direct that the Trust compensate him from the proceeds of the Court by saying; “I wish to be compensated for [X] dollars, in redemption.” This statement is sufficient to remove the authority and jurisdiction from any prosecuting attorney or judge. The accused will be immediately released from custody, with a check, license or claim he identifies as a damage. It doesn’t matter what the action involves or how it is classified by the corporate law as a civil or criminal action!",
"mediaType": "text/plain"
}
},
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/799286458014769159/entities/urn:activity:880620166257176576/activity"
},
{
"type": "Create",
"actor": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/799286458014769159",
"object": {
"type": "Note",
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/799286458014769159/entities/urn:activity:799692081527062528",
"attributedTo": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/799286458014769159",
"content": "Peaceful protest for prosperity...",
"to": [
"https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public"
],
"cc": [
"https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/799286458014769159/followers",
"https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/799286458014769159"
],
"tag": [],
"url": "https://www.minds.com/newsfeed/799692081527062528",
"published": "2018-01-15T17:30:49+00:00",
"inReplyTo": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/799286458014769159/entities/urn:activity:799287351135866880",
"source": {
"content": "Peaceful protest for prosperity...",
"mediaType": "text/plain"
}
},
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/799286458014769159/entities/urn:activity:799692081527062528/activity"
},
{
"type": "Create",
"actor": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/799286458014769159",
"object": {
"type": "Note",
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/799286458014769159/entities/urn:activity:799404029822959616",
"attributedTo": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/799286458014769159",
"content": "8-1.010 - General<br /><br />The Assistant Attorney General in charge of the Civil Rights Division, subject to the general supervision of the Attorney General and under the direction of the Deputy Attorney General, is responsible for conducting, handling, or supervising civil rights matters, as more particularly described in 28 C.F.R. § 0.50. The Division is headed by an Assistant Attorney General, and now consists of the following Sections: Administrative Management Section, Appellate Section, Coordination and Review Section, Criminal Section, Disability Rights Section, Educational Opportunities Section, Employment Litigation Section, Housing and Civil Enforcement Section, Special Litigation Section, and Voting Section, and the Office of Special Counsel for Immigration Related Unfair Labor Practices.<br /><br />Because of the sensitive nature of the constitutional and statutory issues involved and the desirability of uniform application of federal law in this field, close consultation between United States Attorneys and the Division on civil rights matters is of prime importance. Attorneys from the Division may conduct litigation in conjunction with the United States Attorney. Such attorneys will maintain close liaison and consult with the United States Attorney on a continuing basis.<br /><br />Any statements issued to the press in connection with the institution of judicial proceedings in civil rights cases should be coordinated through the Department's Office of Public Affairs and the Assistant Attorney General, Civil Rights Division.<br /><br />8-1.100 - Statutes and Executive Orders Administered by the Civil Rights Division<br /><br />The following is a list of federal statutes and executive orders administered by the Civil Rights Division.<br /><br />CIVIL STATUTES. 15 U.S.C. §§ 1691e(h), 3151(c); 18 U.S.C. § 248; 20 U.S.C. §§ 1681(a), 1706, 1709; 28 U.S.C. § 1862; 29 U.S.C. §§ 794, 1577(c); 31 U.S.C. §§ 6720, 6721(d); 42 U.S.C. §§ 300w-7(c), 300x-7(c), 300y-9(c), 708(c), 1971, 1973 to 1973ff-4, 1997, 2000a-3(a), 2000a-5(a), 2000b(a), 2000c-6(a), 2000d, 2000e-5(f), 2000e-6(a), 2000h-2, 3613, 3789d(c)(3), 3789d(c)(4)(C), 5309(c), 8625(c), 9906(c), 14141; 3789d(c); 49 U.S.C. §§ 306(e), 1615(a)(4).<br />CRIMINAL STATUTES. 18 U.S.C. §§ 241 to 248, 249, 594, 841 to 848, 875, 876, 924, 1001, 1503, 1504, 1508 to 1513, 1581 to 1594, 1621 to 1623, 2191 to 2196; 42 U.S.C. §§ 300a-8, 1973i(a)-(e), 1973j(a)-(c), 1973aa-3, 1973bb(b), 1973dd-3(b)-(c), 1974, 1974a, 2000e-8, 2000e-10, 3631; 46 U.S.C. §§ 658, 701.<br />The Civil Rights Division shares enforcement responsibility under some of these statutes with the Criminal Division, generally depending upon whether the matter involves discrimination or intimidation on account of race, or, in the case of those statutes dealing with obstruction of justice, relates to civil rights litigation.See 28 C.F.R. §§ 0.50 and 0.55. The Civil Rights Division has responsibility under 18 U.S.C. § 1001 with respect to false official statements made in connection with alleged violations of federal civil rights statutes.<br /><br />[updated October 2009]<br /><br />HOW TO FILE A COMPLAINT WITH THE DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE FOR VIOLATION OF THE ABOVE RIGHTS.<br /><br />The Civil Rights Division enforces civil rights laws in a wide variety of contexts. You may use the information on this page to find the appropriate way to submit a complaint or report of a potential civil rights violation. If you are not sure which Section is the appropriate one to receive your complaint, you may contact the Civil Rights Division at (888) 736-5551 or (202) 514-3847.",
"to": [
"https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public"
],
"cc": [
"https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/799286458014769159/followers"
],
"tag": [],
"url": "https://www.minds.com/newsfeed/799404029822959616",
"published": "2018-01-14T22:26:12+00:00",
"source": {
"content": "8-1.010 - General\n\nThe Assistant Attorney General in charge of the Civil Rights Division, subject to the general supervision of the Attorney General and under the direction of the Deputy Attorney General, is responsible for conducting, handling, or supervising civil rights matters, as more particularly described in 28 C.F.R. § 0.50. The Division is headed by an Assistant Attorney General, and now consists of the following Sections: Administrative Management Section, Appellate Section, Coordination and Review Section, Criminal Section, Disability Rights Section, Educational Opportunities Section, Employment Litigation Section, Housing and Civil Enforcement Section, Special Litigation Section, and Voting Section, and the Office of Special Counsel for Immigration Related Unfair Labor Practices.\n\nBecause of the sensitive nature of the constitutional and statutory issues involved and the desirability of uniform application of federal law in this field, close consultation between United States Attorneys and the Division on civil rights matters is of prime importance. Attorneys from the Division may conduct litigation in conjunction with the United States Attorney. Such attorneys will maintain close liaison and consult with the United States Attorney on a continuing basis.\n\nAny statements issued to the press in connection with the institution of judicial proceedings in civil rights cases should be coordinated through the Department's Office of Public Affairs and the Assistant Attorney General, Civil Rights Division.\n\n8-1.100 - Statutes and Executive Orders Administered by the Civil Rights Division\n\nThe following is a list of federal statutes and executive orders administered by the Civil Rights Division.\n\nCIVIL STATUTES. 15 U.S.C. §§ 1691e(h), 3151(c); 18 U.S.C. § 248; 20 U.S.C. §§ 1681(a), 1706, 1709; 28 U.S.C. § 1862; 29 U.S.C. §§ 794, 1577(c); 31 U.S.C. §§ 6720, 6721(d); 42 U.S.C. §§ 300w-7(c), 300x-7(c), 300y-9(c), 708(c), 1971, 1973 to 1973ff-4, 1997, 2000a-3(a), 2000a-5(a), 2000b(a), 2000c-6(a), 2000d, 2000e-5(f), 2000e-6(a), 2000h-2, 3613, 3789d(c)(3), 3789d(c)(4)(C), 5309(c), 8625(c), 9906(c), 14141; 3789d(c); 49 U.S.C. §§ 306(e), 1615(a)(4).\nCRIMINAL STATUTES. 18 U.S.C. §§ 241 to 248, 249, 594, 841 to 848, 875, 876, 924, 1001, 1503, 1504, 1508 to 1513, 1581 to 1594, 1621 to 1623, 2191 to 2196; 42 U.S.C. §§ 300a-8, 1973i(a)-(e), 1973j(a)-(c), 1973aa-3, 1973bb(b), 1973dd-3(b)-(c), 1974, 1974a, 2000e-8, 2000e-10, 3631; 46 U.S.C. §§ 658, 701.\nThe Civil Rights Division shares enforcement responsibility under some of these statutes with the Criminal Division, generally depending upon whether the matter involves discrimination or intimidation on account of race, or, in the case of those statutes dealing with obstruction of justice, relates to civil rights litigation.See 28 C.F.R. §§ 0.50 and 0.55. The Civil Rights Division has responsibility under 18 U.S.C. § 1001 with respect to false official statements made in connection with alleged violations of federal civil rights statutes.\n\n[updated October 2009]\n\nHOW TO FILE A COMPLAINT WITH THE DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE FOR VIOLATION OF THE ABOVE RIGHTS.\n\nThe Civil Rights Division enforces civil rights laws in a wide variety of contexts. You may use the information on this page to find the appropriate way to submit a complaint or report of a potential civil rights violation. If you are not sure which Section is the appropriate one to receive your complaint, you may contact the Civil Rights Division at (888) 736-5551 or (202) 514-3847.",
"mediaType": "text/plain"
}
},
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/799286458014769159/entities/urn:activity:799404029822959616/activity"
},
{
"type": "Create",
"actor": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/799286458014769159",
"object": {
"type": "Note",
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/799286458014769159/entities/urn:activity:799287351135866880",
"attributedTo": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/799286458014769159",
"content": "<a href=\"https://www.change.org/p/united-states-department-of-the-interior-nullify-the-federal-reserve-act-of-1913?recruiter=12906417&utm_source=share_petition&utm_medium=copylink&utm_campaign=share_petition\" target=\"_blank\">https://www.change.org/p/united-states-department-of-the-interior-nullify-the-federal-reserve-act-of-1913?recruiter=12906417&utm_source=share_petition&utm_medium=copylink&utm_campaign=share_petition</a>",
"to": [
"https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public"
],
"cc": [
"https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/799286458014769159/followers"
],
"tag": [],
"url": "https://www.minds.com/newsfeed/799287351135866880",
"published": "2018-01-14T14:42:34+00:00",
"source": {
"content": "https://www.change.org/p/united-states-department-of-the-interior-nullify-the-federal-reserve-act-of-1913?recruiter=12906417&utm_source=share_petition&utm_medium=copylink&utm_campaign=share_petition",
"mediaType": "text/plain"
}
},
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/799286458014769159/entities/urn:activity:799287351135866880/activity"
}
],
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/799286458014769159/outbox",
"partOf": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/799286458014769159/outboxoutbox"
}