A small tool to view real-world ActivityPub objects as JSON! Enter a URL
or username from Mastodon or a similar service below, and we'll send a
request with
the right
Accept
header
to the server to view the underlying object.
{
"@context": "https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams",
"type": "OrderedCollectionPage",
"orderedItems": [
{
"type": "Create",
"actor": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/758009348671676425",
"object": {
"type": "Note",
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/758009348671676425/entities/urn:activity:1234558306481242112",
"attributedTo": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/758009348671676425",
"content": "When a biologist tweeted that stating biological facts is not bigotry, she was attacked by the very body you might expect to support her — The Royal Society of Biology — which labelled her comments as “transphobia”. Perhaps there was some detail of the science she got wrong — in which case you would expect this learned society to point out the error. But despite numerous attempts to find out what was incorrect about her statements, they have refused to answer. Even at its most censorious — the Catholic Church would tell blasphemers what their crime was. The modern witch-burners won’t even do that — they will rarely even discuss their claims with anyone who does not already share their beliefs.<br /><br /><a href=\"https://thecritic.co.uk/sex-deniers-are-the-new-flat-earthers/?fbclid=IwAR33_bsqAZayYxSvavwHoHBczQKaD5zKTxZtdqoK8ZqXvXgkVbJwtfzoqwY\" target=\"_blank\">https://thecritic.co.uk/sex-deniers-are-the-new-flat-earthers/?fbclid=IwAR33_bsqAZayYxSvavwHoHBczQKaD5zKTxZtdqoK8ZqXvXgkVbJwtfzoqwY</a>",
"to": [
"https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public"
],
"cc": [
"https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/758009348671676425/followers"
],
"tag": [],
"url": "https://www.minds.com/newsfeed/1234558306481242112",
"published": "2021-04-29T17:33:57+00:00",
"source": {
"content": "When a biologist tweeted that stating biological facts is not bigotry, she was attacked by the very body you might expect to support her — The Royal Society of Biology — which labelled her comments as “transphobia”. Perhaps there was some detail of the science she got wrong — in which case you would expect this learned society to point out the error. But despite numerous attempts to find out what was incorrect about her statements, they have refused to answer. Even at its most censorious — the Catholic Church would tell blasphemers what their crime was. The modern witch-burners won’t even do that — they will rarely even discuss their claims with anyone who does not already share their beliefs.\n\nhttps://thecritic.co.uk/sex-deniers-are-the-new-flat-earthers/?fbclid=IwAR33_bsqAZayYxSvavwHoHBczQKaD5zKTxZtdqoK8ZqXvXgkVbJwtfzoqwY",
"mediaType": "text/plain"
}
},
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/758009348671676425/entities/urn:activity:1234558306481242112/activity"
},
{
"type": "Create",
"actor": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/758009348671676425",
"object": {
"type": "Note",
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/758009348671676425/entities/urn:activity:1233915552124125184",
"attributedTo": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/758009348671676425",
"content": "''Talking about \"exponential spread\" is very misleading. In normal epidemiological curves, there is a very brief period of exponential growth during the very earliest stage of an epidemic, when none of the population has yet been exposed, so it's like fire spreading through dry grass.<br />The period of exponential growth is brief, and in all known cases, seasonally affected.<br />It makes zero sense that a country which had virtually zero spread during the first wave, or during peak spread weather... and a country with a very dense population and a lot of people without sanitation, would SUDDENLY experience a huge wave.<br />You only see those brief exponential growth spurts when a new infection is going into a naive population, or conditions change to make the spread much easier.<br />The theory that this is a new (but naturally occurring) much more virulent pathogen also flies in the face of conventional epidemiological history... since pathogens generally mutate to LESS harmful forms... biopathogens are \"motivated\" by improving their reproductive success, and killing hosts is a bad reproductive strategy.<br />So if it is genuinely a new much more virulent variant, that does point to intentional biowarfare -- an engineered pathogen. At this point, there is no credible controversy that COVID came from gain of function research, most likely that sponsored by the USA in Wuhan... known in scientific circles as the \"Lab Leak Hypothesis.\"<br />What is harder to know is whether the release was intentional or accidental. If in fact, they're STILL working on more virulent variations, that does point towards the release being intentional, since another accidental release this soon seems unlikely.",
"to": [
"https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public"
],
"cc": [
"https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/758009348671676425/followers"
],
"tag": [],
"url": "https://www.minds.com/newsfeed/1233915552124125184",
"published": "2021-04-27T22:59:52+00:00",
"source": {
"content": "''Talking about \"exponential spread\" is very misleading. In normal epidemiological curves, there is a very brief period of exponential growth during the very earliest stage of an epidemic, when none of the population has yet been exposed, so it's like fire spreading through dry grass.\nThe period of exponential growth is brief, and in all known cases, seasonally affected.\nIt makes zero sense that a country which had virtually zero spread during the first wave, or during peak spread weather... and a country with a very dense population and a lot of people without sanitation, would SUDDENLY experience a huge wave.\nYou only see those brief exponential growth spurts when a new infection is going into a naive population, or conditions change to make the spread much easier.\nThe theory that this is a new (but naturally occurring) much more virulent pathogen also flies in the face of conventional epidemiological history... since pathogens generally mutate to LESS harmful forms... biopathogens are \"motivated\" by improving their reproductive success, and killing hosts is a bad reproductive strategy.\nSo if it is genuinely a new much more virulent variant, that does point to intentional biowarfare -- an engineered pathogen. At this point, there is no credible controversy that COVID came from gain of function research, most likely that sponsored by the USA in Wuhan... known in scientific circles as the \"Lab Leak Hypothesis.\"\nWhat is harder to know is whether the release was intentional or accidental. If in fact, they're STILL working on more virulent variations, that does point towards the release being intentional, since another accidental release this soon seems unlikely.",
"mediaType": "text/plain"
}
},
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/758009348671676425/entities/urn:activity:1233915552124125184/activity"
}
],
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/758009348671676425/outbox",
"partOf": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/758009348671676425/outboxoutbox"
}