A small tool to view real-world ActivityPub objects as JSON! Enter a URL
or username from Mastodon or a similar service below, and we'll send a
request with
the right
Accept
header
to the server to view the underlying object.
{
"@context": "https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams",
"type": "OrderedCollectionPage",
"orderedItems": [
{
"type": "Like",
"actor": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/719572995105890322",
"object": {
"type": "Note",
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/740130307465814024/entities/urn:activity:1534175721700724746",
"attributedTo": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/740130307465814024",
"content": "\"One of the tactics of error in our day is to take something that is well-respected and well-regarded as true and conflate a whole bunch of other things with that original thing (greatly expand the definition, you might say). This accomplishes many things, but mainly, I think, the goal is to make it impossible for you to think or speak about the original thing without also seeming to imply all the new stuff. Clear and precise thinking with careful categories, generally restrains error, whereas muddled and vague thinking is generally good for error, so there are many efforts in our day to produce muddled vagueness.<br /><br />A hundred examples could be provided, but a classic one at this point is climate change. “Do you believe in climate change?” is the sort of media-political-question that obscures like a dozen sub-questions that ought to be examined individually:\"<br /><br />Read more at:",
"to": [
"https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public"
],
"cc": [
"https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/740130307465814024/followers",
"https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/719572995105890322"
],
"tag": [],
"url": "https://www.minds.com/newsfeed/1534175721700724746",
"published": "2023-08-04T12:26:34+00:00",
"inReplyTo": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/719572995105890322/entities/urn:activity:1533858066976477200",
"source": {
"content": "\"One of the tactics of error in our day is to take something that is well-respected and well-regarded as true and conflate a whole bunch of other things with that original thing (greatly expand the definition, you might say). This accomplishes many things, but mainly, I think, the goal is to make it impossible for you to think or speak about the original thing without also seeming to imply all the new stuff. Clear and precise thinking with careful categories, generally restrains error, whereas muddled and vague thinking is generally good for error, so there are many efforts in our day to produce muddled vagueness.\n\nA hundred examples could be provided, but a classic one at this point is climate change. “Do you believe in climate change?” is the sort of media-political-question that obscures like a dozen sub-questions that ought to be examined individually:\"\n\nRead more at:",
"mediaType": "text/plain"
}
},
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/719572995105890322/https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/740130307465814024/entities/urn:activity:1534175721700724746/like"
}
],
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/719572995105890322/liked",
"partOf": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/719572995105890322/likedoutbox"
}