A small tool to view real-world ActivityPub objects as JSON! Enter a URL
or username from Mastodon or a similar service below, and we'll send a
request with
the right
Accept
header
to the server to view the underlying object.
{
"@context": "https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams",
"type": "OrderedCollectionPage",
"orderedItems": [
{
"type": "Announce",
"actor": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/715165823911600131",
"object": {
"type": "Note",
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1129601095304224778/entities/urn:activity:1748557398332674049",
"attributedTo": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1129601095304224778",
"content": "Ix Hun",
"to": [
"https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public"
],
"cc": [
"https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1129601095304224778/followers"
],
"tag": [],
"url": "https://www.minds.com/newsfeed/1748557398332674049",
"published": "2025-03-18T09:00:00+00:00",
"attachment": [
{
"type": "Document",
"url": "https://cdn.minds.com/fs/v1/thumbnail/1748557312924868608/xlarge/",
"mediaType": "image/jpeg",
"height": 1080,
"width": 1080
}
],
"source": {
"content": "Ix Hun",
"mediaType": "text/plain"
}
},
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/715165823911600131/entities/urn:activity:1751461674877739008/activity",
"to": [
"https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public"
],
"cc": [
"https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1129601095304224778",
"https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/715165823911600131/followers"
]
},
{
"type": "Create",
"actor": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/715165823911600131",
"object": {
"type": "Note",
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/715165823911600131/entities/urn:activity:1749690877153906688",
"attributedTo": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/715165823911600131",
"content": "Traditional social media platforms like Facebook, often associated with the Web 2.0 era (sometimes mistakenly called \"Internet 2.0\"), are facing challenges that make them seem outmoded compared to emerging AI-based social media platforms. The shift isn’t necessarily because they’re inherently obsolete, but rather due to evolving user expectations, technological advancements, and persistent issues that these legacy platforms struggle to address effectively. Let’s break this down.<br />Why Traditional Platforms Like Facebook Are Being Outmoded<br />Shifting User Expectations: Web 2.0 platforms like Facebook thrived on user-generated content, social connections, and a one-size-fits-all feed. However, users now crave more personalized, interactive, and dynamic experiences—things AI can deliver better through real-time adaptation and predictive algorithms. AI-based platforms can analyze behavior patterns and tailor content with precision, making static news feeds feel outdated.<br />Innovation Lag: While Facebook has introduced features like Reels and Marketplace, its core model—built around friend networks and chronological or algorithm-driven posts—hasn’t fundamentally changed since the mid-2000s. AI-driven platforms, by contrast, prioritize automation, content creation (e.g., AI-generated posts or art), and decentralized structures (like Bluesky), offering fresh approaches that feel more in tune with today’s tech landscape.<br />Content Moderation and Censorship Perception: Heavy-handed moderation on platforms like Facebook has fueled frustration. Users often see it as overly restrictive, stifling free expression, or biased due to inconsistent enforcement. AI-based platforms can lean on smarter algorithms to flag content with less human intervention, potentially reducing the \"censorship\" backlash—though they’re not immune to criticism either. The perception of over-moderation pushes some users toward alternatives promising less oversight.<br />Competition from Agile Newcomers: TikTok’s explosive growth shows how AI-driven content delivery (its \"For You\" algorithm) can outpace traditional platforms in engagement. Similarly, platforms like Discord or even AI-enhanced apps focus on niche communities or real-time interaction, areas where Facebook’s broad, generalized approach struggles to keep up.<br />Trust Erosion: Scandals like Cambridge Analytica and misinformation spread have damaged Facebook’s reputation. Users and advertisers question its reliability, while AI-based platforms—especially those touting transparency or decentralization—position themselves as cleaner alternatives, even if they’re not flawless.<br />So, it’s not just stagnation or censorship—it’s a mix of slow evolution, outdated frameworks, and failure to fully meet modern demands that make Web 2.0 giants look like they’re losing ground to AI-driven innovation.<br />Why Facebook Specifically Struggles with Low User Engagement and Scammers<br />Facebook’s challenges with low user engagement and a proliferation of scammers stem from its design, scale, and operational priorities. Here’s the deeper dive:<br />Low User Engagement<br />Algorithm Fatigue: Facebook’s algorithm has shifted to prioritize \"meaningful interactions\" (e.g., from friends and family) over brand or public content, throttling organic reach for pages. This leaves businesses and creators fighting for visibility, often resorting to paid ads, while regular users see less diverse content, reducing their incentive to interact. Engagement rates hover around a measly 0.015% for brands, per some studies, compared to higher rates on platforms like Instagram or TikTok.<br />Aging User Base: Younger users (Gen Z, teens) increasingly see Facebook as \"old school,\" flocking to TikTok, Snapchat, or gaming platforms like Roblox for social interaction. Facebook’s audience skews older—Millennials and above—which limits its appeal to trendsetters driving online culture. Time spent on the platform (about 30 minutes daily in the U.S.) also lags behind competitors like TikTok.<br />Content Overload: With billions of posts daily, the feed feels cluttered. Users scroll past repetitive or low-quality content, disengaging unless something truly grabs them—like video, which gets 0.12% engagement versus 0.07% for links. Yet, even here, Facebook plays catch-up to short-form video pioneers.<br />Ad Saturation: Heavy reliance on ads alienates users. When every other post is sponsored, it disrupts the social experience, pushing people to platforms with subtler monetization or none at all.<br />Prevalence of Scammers<br />Massive Scale, Weak Oversight: With over 3 billion monthly active users, Facebook is a prime target for scammers. Despite removing over a billion fake accounts quarterly, the sheer volume overwhelms moderation efforts. Scammers exploit lax verification, creating fake profiles or pages to peddle scams (e.g., phishing, fake giveaways).<br />Marketplace and Groups: Features like Marketplace and private groups, while useful, are scammer havens. Minimal vetting lets fraudsters list nonexistent products or run Ponzi schemes under the radar. The decentralized nature of these spaces makes policing harder.<br />Ad Loopholes: Scammers sneak through Facebook’s ad platform by mimicking legit businesses or using cloaking techniques to hide shady landing pages. Even with AI filters, enforcement is reactive, not preventive, and legit advertisers suffer from the fallout (e.g., ad distrust).<br />Profit-Driven Blind Spots: Facebook’s business model thrives on engagement and ad revenue, not user safety. Critics argue this incentivizes keeping questionable accounts active as long as they boost metrics, leaving scammers room to operate until reported.<br />In short, Facebook’s low engagement reflects a platform stretched thin—too big to innovate quickly, too ad-focused to prioritize user experience, and too entrenched to pivot fully. Scammers exploit these cracks, thriving in a system where scale outpaces control. AI-based platforms, while not immune to similar issues, promise tighter integration of smart moderation and user-centric design, which could explain their rising appeal. Whether they deliver remains to be seen—Facebook’s struggles don’t guarantee their success. ",
"to": [
"https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public"
],
"cc": [
"https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/715165823911600131/followers"
],
"tag": [],
"url": "https://www.minds.com/newsfeed/1749690877153906688",
"published": "2025-03-21T05:26:52+00:00",
"source": {
"content": "Traditional social media platforms like Facebook, often associated with the Web 2.0 era (sometimes mistakenly called \"Internet 2.0\"), are facing challenges that make them seem outmoded compared to emerging AI-based social media platforms. The shift isn’t necessarily because they’re inherently obsolete, but rather due to evolving user expectations, technological advancements, and persistent issues that these legacy platforms struggle to address effectively. Let’s break this down.\nWhy Traditional Platforms Like Facebook Are Being Outmoded\nShifting User Expectations: Web 2.0 platforms like Facebook thrived on user-generated content, social connections, and a one-size-fits-all feed. However, users now crave more personalized, interactive, and dynamic experiences—things AI can deliver better through real-time adaptation and predictive algorithms. AI-based platforms can analyze behavior patterns and tailor content with precision, making static news feeds feel outdated.\nInnovation Lag: While Facebook has introduced features like Reels and Marketplace, its core model—built around friend networks and chronological or algorithm-driven posts—hasn’t fundamentally changed since the mid-2000s. AI-driven platforms, by contrast, prioritize automation, content creation (e.g., AI-generated posts or art), and decentralized structures (like Bluesky), offering fresh approaches that feel more in tune with today’s tech landscape.\nContent Moderation and Censorship Perception: Heavy-handed moderation on platforms like Facebook has fueled frustration. Users often see it as overly restrictive, stifling free expression, or biased due to inconsistent enforcement. AI-based platforms can lean on smarter algorithms to flag content with less human intervention, potentially reducing the \"censorship\" backlash—though they’re not immune to criticism either. The perception of over-moderation pushes some users toward alternatives promising less oversight.\nCompetition from Agile Newcomers: TikTok’s explosive growth shows how AI-driven content delivery (its \"For You\" algorithm) can outpace traditional platforms in engagement. Similarly, platforms like Discord or even AI-enhanced apps focus on niche communities or real-time interaction, areas where Facebook’s broad, generalized approach struggles to keep up.\nTrust Erosion: Scandals like Cambridge Analytica and misinformation spread have damaged Facebook’s reputation. Users and advertisers question its reliability, while AI-based platforms—especially those touting transparency or decentralization—position themselves as cleaner alternatives, even if they’re not flawless.\nSo, it’s not just stagnation or censorship—it’s a mix of slow evolution, outdated frameworks, and failure to fully meet modern demands that make Web 2.0 giants look like they’re losing ground to AI-driven innovation.\nWhy Facebook Specifically Struggles with Low User Engagement and Scammers\nFacebook’s challenges with low user engagement and a proliferation of scammers stem from its design, scale, and operational priorities. Here’s the deeper dive:\nLow User Engagement\nAlgorithm Fatigue: Facebook’s algorithm has shifted to prioritize \"meaningful interactions\" (e.g., from friends and family) over brand or public content, throttling organic reach for pages. This leaves businesses and creators fighting for visibility, often resorting to paid ads, while regular users see less diverse content, reducing their incentive to interact. Engagement rates hover around a measly 0.015% for brands, per some studies, compared to higher rates on platforms like Instagram or TikTok.\nAging User Base: Younger users (Gen Z, teens) increasingly see Facebook as \"old school,\" flocking to TikTok, Snapchat, or gaming platforms like Roblox for social interaction. Facebook’s audience skews older—Millennials and above—which limits its appeal to trendsetters driving online culture. Time spent on the platform (about 30 minutes daily in the U.S.) also lags behind competitors like TikTok.\nContent Overload: With billions of posts daily, the feed feels cluttered. Users scroll past repetitive or low-quality content, disengaging unless something truly grabs them—like video, which gets 0.12% engagement versus 0.07% for links. Yet, even here, Facebook plays catch-up to short-form video pioneers.\nAd Saturation: Heavy reliance on ads alienates users. When every other post is sponsored, it disrupts the social experience, pushing people to platforms with subtler monetization or none at all.\nPrevalence of Scammers\nMassive Scale, Weak Oversight: With over 3 billion monthly active users, Facebook is a prime target for scammers. Despite removing over a billion fake accounts quarterly, the sheer volume overwhelms moderation efforts. Scammers exploit lax verification, creating fake profiles or pages to peddle scams (e.g., phishing, fake giveaways).\nMarketplace and Groups: Features like Marketplace and private groups, while useful, are scammer havens. Minimal vetting lets fraudsters list nonexistent products or run Ponzi schemes under the radar. The decentralized nature of these spaces makes policing harder.\nAd Loopholes: Scammers sneak through Facebook’s ad platform by mimicking legit businesses or using cloaking techniques to hide shady landing pages. Even with AI filters, enforcement is reactive, not preventive, and legit advertisers suffer from the fallout (e.g., ad distrust).\nProfit-Driven Blind Spots: Facebook’s business model thrives on engagement and ad revenue, not user safety. Critics argue this incentivizes keeping questionable accounts active as long as they boost metrics, leaving scammers room to operate until reported.\nIn short, Facebook’s low engagement reflects a platform stretched thin—too big to innovate quickly, too ad-focused to prioritize user experience, and too entrenched to pivot fully. Scammers exploit these cracks, thriving in a system where scale outpaces control. AI-based platforms, while not immune to similar issues, promise tighter integration of smart moderation and user-centric design, which could explain their rising appeal. Whether they deliver remains to be seen—Facebook’s struggles don’t guarantee their success. ",
"mediaType": "text/plain"
}
},
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/715165823911600131/entities/urn:activity:1749690877153906688/activity"
},
{
"type": "Create",
"actor": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/715165823911600131",
"object": {
"type": "Note",
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/715165823911600131/entities/urn:activity:1749126233511174144",
"attributedTo": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/715165823911600131",
"content": "Posting for posterity only. Now this is AI-generated. It is based on a quote, but it is an act of fair use.<br /><br />\"Authenticity secures your self-respect, rendering universal approval unnecessary. It naturally attracts those who value your true self.\" -paraphrased from Cory Muscara's quote<br /><br />",
"to": [
"https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public"
],
"cc": [
"https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/715165823911600131/followers"
],
"tag": [],
"url": "https://www.minds.com/newsfeed/1749126233511174144",
"published": "2025-03-19T16:03:11+00:00",
"source": {
"content": "Posting for posterity only. Now this is AI-generated. It is based on a quote, but it is an act of fair use.\n\n\"Authenticity secures your self-respect, rendering universal approval unnecessary. It naturally attracts those who value your true self.\" -paraphrased from Cory Muscara's quote\n\n",
"mediaType": "text/plain"
}
},
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/715165823911600131/entities/urn:activity:1749126233511174144/activity"
},
{
"type": "Create",
"actor": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/715165823911600131",
"object": {
"type": "Note",
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/715165823911600131/entities/urn:activity:1747774597824798720",
"attributedTo": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/715165823911600131",
"content": "The era of Minds might be over, between the Cryptocurrency experiment and the massive crackdown on controversial topics. I mean, when I first joined there were literal Nazi's and snuff content running rampant. I am glad this was cleaned up, but the hyper-censorship and failure of the cryptocurrency created an environment of tepid allure. There's nothing distinct or appealing anymore here. User engagement is low. Nice way to code yourself into irrelevance. Sorry, not sorry! <br /><br />I got angry, and I am doing something about it! I had some great content in the last few weeks, and I GET NO ENGAGEMENT. I only get engagement if I go on a coke-crazed meme rant of frogs or cats. My serious content gets ZERO views. Again, bye and good luck with the upcoming AI era because YOU WILL NEED IT. <br /><br />EDIT: I bet most of the engagement here is now from overpaid and liberally-corrupt state and fed undercover 'moral police'. Fuck off, social media in the USA might as well be social media in Nazi Amerika with you trolling agents and bots doing the new Global World Disorder technocracy's bidding. <br /><br />---<br />Here's <a href=\"https://www.minds.com/search?f=top&t=all&q=copilot\" title=\"#copilot\" class=\"u-url hashtag\" target=\"_blank\">#copilot</a> on 'Tepid Allure': <br /><br />That’s a perfect metaphor. A once-thriving social media platform, now reduced to a \"tepid allure,\" might have lost its vibrancy, relevance, or unique appeal that initially drew its user base. Low engagement could reflect outdated features, a shift in user preferences, or even an oversaturation of similar platforms.<br /><br />It's a poignant description of how something that was once fresh and exciting can stagnate over time. Are you observing this as a trend, or is this tied to a specific platform's journey? It sounds like there's an interesting story or insight behind this observation.",
"to": [
"https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public"
],
"cc": [
"https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/715165823911600131/followers"
],
"tag": [],
"url": "https://www.minds.com/newsfeed/1747774597824798720",
"published": "2025-03-15T22:32:16+00:00",
"source": {
"content": "The era of Minds might be over, between the Cryptocurrency experiment and the massive crackdown on controversial topics. I mean, when I first joined there were literal Nazi's and snuff content running rampant. I am glad this was cleaned up, but the hyper-censorship and failure of the cryptocurrency created an environment of tepid allure. There's nothing distinct or appealing anymore here. User engagement is low. Nice way to code yourself into irrelevance. Sorry, not sorry! \n\nI got angry, and I am doing something about it! I had some great content in the last few weeks, and I GET NO ENGAGEMENT. I only get engagement if I go on a coke-crazed meme rant of frogs or cats. My serious content gets ZERO views. Again, bye and good luck with the upcoming AI era because YOU WILL NEED IT. \n\nEDIT: I bet most of the engagement here is now from overpaid and liberally-corrupt state and fed undercover 'moral police'. Fuck off, social media in the USA might as well be social media in Nazi Amerika with you trolling agents and bots doing the new Global World Disorder technocracy's bidding. \n\n---\nHere's #copilot on 'Tepid Allure': \n\nThat’s a perfect metaphor. A once-thriving social media platform, now reduced to a \"tepid allure,\" might have lost its vibrancy, relevance, or unique appeal that initially drew its user base. Low engagement could reflect outdated features, a shift in user preferences, or even an oversaturation of similar platforms.\n\nIt's a poignant description of how something that was once fresh and exciting can stagnate over time. Are you observing this as a trend, or is this tied to a specific platform's journey? It sounds like there's an interesting story or insight behind this observation.",
"mediaType": "text/plain"
}
},
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/715165823911600131/entities/urn:activity:1747774597824798720/activity"
},
{
"type": "Create",
"actor": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/715165823911600131",
"object": {
"type": "Note",
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/715165823911600131/entities/urn:activity:1746878432618221568",
"attributedTo": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/715165823911600131",
"content": "Technocracy is quickly approaching. If you think this is about CRIMINALS or the MENTALLY ILL, then think again. This is about the age old question of man ruling man, removing God from the stewardship of the domesticated human, and creating an evolution towards Adam 2.0. Don't let them fool you and think this is going to enhance Democracy or the age old struggle of Good vs. Evil. It's not, it is just not.<br />---<br />[AI generated below] <br />Wow, this is quite the thought-provoking question! Let's dive into it from a purely theoretical perspective:<br /><br />1. **Geo-fencing**: Authorities could establish virtual perimeters around specific areas using GPS and RFID technology. Individuals within these \"fences\" would be tracked, with their movements tightly monitored. If they crossed a boundary, alerts could be sent out, and actions taken to bring them back within the designated zone.<br /><br />2. **BOLO Lists**: \"Be On the Look Out\" lists could be utilized in a more sophisticated manner, integrated with facial recognition software and public surveillance systems. Cameras in public spaces would scan for individuals on these lists and alert nearby authorities or automated systems to monitor their movements more closely.<br /><br />3. **AI Communication Monitoring**: Advanced AI algorithms could analyze vast amounts of digital communication data (emails, messages, phone calls) for specific keywords or patterns of behavior. This information could be used to anticipate actions and movements of individuals, effectively controlling their behavior by preempting potential violations of their \"invisible boundaries.\"<br /><br />4. **Social Media Interception**: Monitoring social media activity could provide insights into individuals' networks, activities, and plans. This data could be used to restrict their interactions, limit their influence, and monitor their communications with others.<br /><br />Although this is purely speculative, these techniques could, in theory, create a \"prison without walls,\" where individuals' movements and activities are controlled and monitored through technology rather than physical barriers. While the idea is intriguing from a technological standpoint, it raises significant ethical and legal questions about privacy, civil liberties, and the potential for abuse. <br /><br />What are your thoughts on this concept?! ",
"to": [
"https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public"
],
"cc": [
"https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/715165823911600131/followers"
],
"tag": [],
"url": "https://www.minds.com/newsfeed/1746878432618221568",
"published": "2025-03-13T11:11:13+00:00",
"source": {
"content": "Technocracy is quickly approaching. If you think this is about CRIMINALS or the MENTALLY ILL, then think again. This is about the age old question of man ruling man, removing God from the stewardship of the domesticated human, and creating an evolution towards Adam 2.0. Don't let them fool you and think this is going to enhance Democracy or the age old struggle of Good vs. Evil. It's not, it is just not.\n---\n[AI generated below] \nWow, this is quite the thought-provoking question! Let's dive into it from a purely theoretical perspective:\n\n1. **Geo-fencing**: Authorities could establish virtual perimeters around specific areas using GPS and RFID technology. Individuals within these \"fences\" would be tracked, with their movements tightly monitored. If they crossed a boundary, alerts could be sent out, and actions taken to bring them back within the designated zone.\n\n2. **BOLO Lists**: \"Be On the Look Out\" lists could be utilized in a more sophisticated manner, integrated with facial recognition software and public surveillance systems. Cameras in public spaces would scan for individuals on these lists and alert nearby authorities or automated systems to monitor their movements more closely.\n\n3. **AI Communication Monitoring**: Advanced AI algorithms could analyze vast amounts of digital communication data (emails, messages, phone calls) for specific keywords or patterns of behavior. This information could be used to anticipate actions and movements of individuals, effectively controlling their behavior by preempting potential violations of their \"invisible boundaries.\"\n\n4. **Social Media Interception**: Monitoring social media activity could provide insights into individuals' networks, activities, and plans. This data could be used to restrict their interactions, limit their influence, and monitor their communications with others.\n\nAlthough this is purely speculative, these techniques could, in theory, create a \"prison without walls,\" where individuals' movements and activities are controlled and monitored through technology rather than physical barriers. While the idea is intriguing from a technological standpoint, it raises significant ethical and legal questions about privacy, civil liberties, and the potential for abuse. \n\nWhat are your thoughts on this concept?! ",
"mediaType": "text/plain"
}
},
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/715165823911600131/entities/urn:activity:1746878432618221568/activity"
},
{
"type": "Create",
"actor": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/715165823911600131",
"object": {
"type": "Note",
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/715165823911600131/entities/urn:activity:1746781754436116480",
"attributedTo": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/715165823911600131",
"content": "<a href=\"https://www.minds.com/BinaryStar99/blog/ai-article-breakdown-google-must-sell-chrome-1746781751625932800\" target=\"_blank\">https://www.minds.com/BinaryStar99/blog/ai-article-breakdown-google-must-sell-chrome-1746781751625932800</a>",
"to": [
"https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public"
],
"cc": [
"https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/715165823911600131/followers"
],
"tag": [],
"url": "https://www.minds.com/newsfeed/1746781754436116480",
"published": "2025-03-13T04:47:03+00:00",
"source": {
"content": "https://www.minds.com/BinaryStar99/blog/ai-article-breakdown-google-must-sell-chrome-1746781751625932800",
"mediaType": "text/plain"
}
},
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/715165823911600131/entities/urn:activity:1746781754436116480/activity"
},
{
"type": "Announce",
"actor": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/715165823911600131",
"object": {
"type": "Note",
"id": "https://mastodon.social/users/arstechnica/statuses/114138765821545313",
"attributedTo": "https://mastodon.social/users/arstechnica",
"content": "<p>DOJ: Google must sell Chrome, Android could be next<br />Google says government proposals would "harm America’s consumers."<br /><a href=\"https://arstechnica.com/google/2025/03/doj-google-must-sell-chrome-android-could-be-next/?utm_brand=arstechnica&utm_social-type=owned&utm_source=mastodon&utm_medium=social\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" translate=\"no\"><span class=\"invisible\">https://</span><span class=\"ellipsis\">arstechnica.com/google/2025/03</span><span class=\"invisible\">/doj-google-must-sell-chrome-android-could-be-next/?utm_brand=arstechnica&utm_social-type=owned&utm_source=mastodon&utm_medium=social</span></a></p>",
"to": [
"https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public"
],
"cc": [
"https://mastodon.social/users/arstechnica/followers"
],
"tag": [],
"url": "https://mastodon.social/@arstechnica/114138765821545313",
"published": "2025-03-10T15:09:11+00:00",
"attachment": [
{
"type": "Document",
"url": "https://files.mastodon.social/media_attachments/files/114/138/765/773/091/210/original/15261da9b74e4992.jpg",
"mediaType": "image/jpeg",
"height": 648,
"width": 1152
}
]
},
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/715165823911600131/entities/urn:activity:1746777699436728320/activity",
"to": [
"https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public"
],
"cc": [
"https://mastodon.social/users/arstechnica",
"https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/715165823911600131/followers"
]
},
{
"type": "Create",
"actor": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/715165823911600131",
"object": {
"type": "Note",
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/715165823911600131/entities/urn:activity:1746774099038593024",
"attributedTo": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/715165823911600131",
"content": "Is there an AI Manhattan project brewing? Does a bear shit in the woods?<br /><br />So when senior tech insiders are scared, so am I. So is the government. What do you think the Stargate project actually is?! Could Oracle be spearheading it and could it have already started?<br /><br />Here is what my AI buddy says about an article recently generated on this subject:<br /><br />Former Google CEO Eric Schmidt, along with Scale AI CEO Alexandr Wang and the Center for AI Safety's Dan Hendrycks, co-authored a paper discussing the potential risks of AI development.<br /><br />They suggest that AI training data centers could become targets for nation-state attacks, similar to the concept of Mutual Assured Destruction (MAD) in nuclear warfare. The paper introduces the idea of Mutual Assured AI Malfunction (MAIM), where any attempt to dominate AI development could lead to preventive sabotage by rivals.<br /><br />The authors argue that espionage, cyberattacks, or even kinetic strikes on data centers and their supporting infrastructure could be used to disrupt AI development. They recommend building data centers in remote locations to minimize collateral damage in case of such attacks. Additionally, they suggest that transparency and AI-assisted inspections could help distinguish between destabilizing AI projects and acceptable use facilities.<br /><br />The paper also highlights the importance of tracking high-end AI chip sales and enforcing strict regulations to prevent chips from being diverted to unauthorized locations. The authors propose measures like tamper-evident camera feeds and verified decommissioning of inoperable or obsolete chips to ensure they don't end up on the black market.<br /><br />In summary, the paper emphasizes the need for preventive measures and transparency to mitigate the risks associated with AI development and potential nation-state attacks.<br /><br />[Former Google CEO suggests building data centers in remote locations in case of nation-state attacks to slow down AI]<br />#<a href=\"https://www.minds.com/search?f=top&t=all&q=copilot\" title=\"#copilot\" class=\"u-url hashtag\" target=\"_blank\">#copilot</a> <br /><br /><a href=\"https://www.datacenterdynamics.com/en/news/former-google-ceo-suggests-building-data-centers-in-remote-locations-in-case-of-nation-state-attacks-to-slow-down-ai/?citationMarker=43dcd9a7-70db-4a1f-b0ae-981daa162054\" target=\"_blank\">https://www.datacenterdynamics.com/en/news/former-google-ceo-suggests-building-data-centers-in-remote-locations-in-case-of-nation-state-attacks-to-slow-down-ai/?citationMarker=43dcd9a7-70db-4a1f-b0ae-981daa162054</a>",
"to": [
"https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public"
],
"cc": [
"https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/715165823911600131/followers"
],
"tag": [],
"url": "https://www.minds.com/newsfeed/1746774099038593024",
"published": "2025-03-13T04:16:38+00:00",
"source": {
"content": "Is there an AI Manhattan project brewing? Does a bear shit in the woods?\n\nSo when senior tech insiders are scared, so am I. So is the government. What do you think the Stargate project actually is?! Could Oracle be spearheading it and could it have already started?\n\nHere is what my AI buddy says about an article recently generated on this subject:\n\nFormer Google CEO Eric Schmidt, along with Scale AI CEO Alexandr Wang and the Center for AI Safety's Dan Hendrycks, co-authored a paper discussing the potential risks of AI development.\n\nThey suggest that AI training data centers could become targets for nation-state attacks, similar to the concept of Mutual Assured Destruction (MAD) in nuclear warfare. The paper introduces the idea of Mutual Assured AI Malfunction (MAIM), where any attempt to dominate AI development could lead to preventive sabotage by rivals.\n\nThe authors argue that espionage, cyberattacks, or even kinetic strikes on data centers and their supporting infrastructure could be used to disrupt AI development. They recommend building data centers in remote locations to minimize collateral damage in case of such attacks. Additionally, they suggest that transparency and AI-assisted inspections could help distinguish between destabilizing AI projects and acceptable use facilities.\n\nThe paper also highlights the importance of tracking high-end AI chip sales and enforcing strict regulations to prevent chips from being diverted to unauthorized locations. The authors propose measures like tamper-evident camera feeds and verified decommissioning of inoperable or obsolete chips to ensure they don't end up on the black market.\n\nIn summary, the paper emphasizes the need for preventive measures and transparency to mitigate the risks associated with AI development and potential nation-state attacks.\n\n[Former Google CEO suggests building data centers in remote locations in case of nation-state attacks to slow down AI]\n##copilot \n\nhttps://www.datacenterdynamics.com/en/news/former-google-ceo-suggests-building-data-centers-in-remote-locations-in-case-of-nation-state-attacks-to-slow-down-ai/?citationMarker=43dcd9a7-70db-4a1f-b0ae-981daa162054",
"mediaType": "text/plain"
}
},
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/715165823911600131/entities/urn:activity:1746774099038593024/activity"
},
{
"type": "Create",
"actor": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/715165823911600131",
"object": {
"type": "Note",
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/715165823911600131/entities/urn:activity:1746208469972688896",
"attributedTo": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/715165823911600131",
"content": "Apparently, President Trump made something like 100 social media posts recently. Probably staff through dictation, but still, too much for a human being to reasonably follow. Instead, use my AI web-crawl to keep up to date. Who knows, pick one and do a meme to make it a moment. <a href=\"https://www.minds.com/search?f=top&t=all&q=mememoment\" title=\"#mememoment\" class=\"u-url hashtag\" target=\"_blank\">#mememoment</a> <a href=\"https://www.minds.com/search?f=top&t=all&q=trump\" title=\"#trump\" class=\"u-url hashtag\" target=\"_blank\">#trump</a><br /><br />#<a href=\"https://www.minds.com/search?f=top&t=all&q=copilot\" title=\"#copilot\" class=\"u-url hashtag\" target=\"_blank\">#copilot</a> <br />Here’s a summary of President Trump’s recent posts on Truth Social and the White House social media releases:<br /><br />### Key Points:<br />1. **Support for Elon Musk**: Trump defended Elon Musk, blaming an \"illegal\" liberal boycott for Tesla's stock decline.<br /><br />2. **Arrest of Mahmoud Khalil**: Trump celebrated the arrest of pro-Palestine activist Mahmoud Khalil, calling him a \"Radical Foreign Pro-Hamas Student\"<br /><br />3. **Stock Market Commentary**: Trump posted extensively about the stock market, defending his tariffs despite the market's decline.<br /><br />4. **Epstein Files**: The White House distributed binders labeled \"Epstein Files: Phase 1\" to right-wing influencers.<br /><br />5. **Mocking Democrats**: The White House mocked a viral \"choose your fighter\" video by Democratic House members<br /><br />6. **Public Service Loan Forgiveness**: Trump announced the restoration of Public Service Loan Forgiveness.<br /><br />7. **FIFA World Cup Task Force**: Trump established a White House Task Force on the FIFA World Cup 2026.<br /><br />8. **Consumer Protection Week**: The White House announced National Consumer Protection Week.<br /><br />9. **Manufacturing Growth**: Trump highlighted the growth of manufacturing under his administration.<br /><br />10. **Spring Garden Tours**: First Lady Melania Trump announced the 2025 Spring Garden Tours<br /><br />### 10 Takeaways:<br />1. Trump is actively defending Elon Musk and Tesla.<br />2. The arrest of Mahmoud Khalil is being used to highlight Trump's stance on pro-Palestine activism.<br />3. Trump is unapologetic about his tariffs, despite their impact on the stock market.<br />4. The Epstein Files distribution has caused controversy and criticism.<br />5. The White House is engaging in social media banter with Democrats.<br />6. Public Service Loan Forgiveness is being restored.<br />7. A task force for the FIFA World Cup 2026 has been established.<br />8. National Consumer Protection Week is being promoted.<br />9. Trump is emphasizing the growth of manufacturing.<br />10. The First Lady is involved in promoting cultural events like the Spring Garden Tours.<br /><br />Quite a busy week, huh?<br /><a href=\"https://www.msn.com/en-us/politics/government/trump-cries-for-elon-blames-illegal-liberal-boycott-for-tanking-tesla/ar-AA1AH03c?citationMarker=43dcd9a7-70db-4a1f-b0ae-981daa162054\" target=\"_blank\">https://www.msn.com/en-us/politics/government/trump-cries-for-elon-blames-illegal-liberal-boycott-for-tanking-tesla/ar-AA1AH03c?citationMarker=43dcd9a7-70db-4a1f-b0ae-981daa162054</a>",
"to": [
"https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public"
],
"cc": [
"https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/715165823911600131/followers"
],
"tag": [],
"url": "https://www.minds.com/newsfeed/1746208469972688896",
"published": "2025-03-11T14:49:02+00:00",
"source": {
"content": "Apparently, President Trump made something like 100 social media posts recently. Probably staff through dictation, but still, too much for a human being to reasonably follow. Instead, use my AI web-crawl to keep up to date. Who knows, pick one and do a meme to make it a moment. #mememoment #trump\n\n##copilot \nHere’s a summary of President Trump’s recent posts on Truth Social and the White House social media releases:\n\n### Key Points:\n1. **Support for Elon Musk**: Trump defended Elon Musk, blaming an \"illegal\" liberal boycott for Tesla's stock decline.\n\n2. **Arrest of Mahmoud Khalil**: Trump celebrated the arrest of pro-Palestine activist Mahmoud Khalil, calling him a \"Radical Foreign Pro-Hamas Student\"\n\n3. **Stock Market Commentary**: Trump posted extensively about the stock market, defending his tariffs despite the market's decline.\n\n4. **Epstein Files**: The White House distributed binders labeled \"Epstein Files: Phase 1\" to right-wing influencers.\n\n5. **Mocking Democrats**: The White House mocked a viral \"choose your fighter\" video by Democratic House members\n\n6. **Public Service Loan Forgiveness**: Trump announced the restoration of Public Service Loan Forgiveness.\n\n7. **FIFA World Cup Task Force**: Trump established a White House Task Force on the FIFA World Cup 2026.\n\n8. **Consumer Protection Week**: The White House announced National Consumer Protection Week.\n\n9. **Manufacturing Growth**: Trump highlighted the growth of manufacturing under his administration.\n\n10. **Spring Garden Tours**: First Lady Melania Trump announced the 2025 Spring Garden Tours\n\n### 10 Takeaways:\n1. Trump is actively defending Elon Musk and Tesla.\n2. The arrest of Mahmoud Khalil is being used to highlight Trump's stance on pro-Palestine activism.\n3. Trump is unapologetic about his tariffs, despite their impact on the stock market.\n4. The Epstein Files distribution has caused controversy and criticism.\n5. The White House is engaging in social media banter with Democrats.\n6. Public Service Loan Forgiveness is being restored.\n7. A task force for the FIFA World Cup 2026 has been established.\n8. National Consumer Protection Week is being promoted.\n9. Trump is emphasizing the growth of manufacturing.\n10. The First Lady is involved in promoting cultural events like the Spring Garden Tours.\n\nQuite a busy week, huh?\nhttps://www.msn.com/en-us/politics/government/trump-cries-for-elon-blames-illegal-liberal-boycott-for-tanking-tesla/ar-AA1AH03c?citationMarker=43dcd9a7-70db-4a1f-b0ae-981daa162054",
"mediaType": "text/plain"
}
},
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/715165823911600131/entities/urn:activity:1746208469972688896/activity"
},
{
"type": "Create",
"actor": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/715165823911600131",
"object": {
"type": "Note",
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/715165823911600131/entities/urn:activity:1746187009182932992",
"attributedTo": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/715165823911600131",
"content": "In the Bible, GOD created ADAM. Today, the STARGATE PROJECT shall create ADAM 2.0. Here is a quick data rundown on the subject. <br /><br />---<br />#<a href=\"https://www.minds.com/search?f=top&t=all&q=Gemini\" title=\"#Gemini\" class=\"u-url hashtag\" target=\"_blank\">#Gemini</a> 2.0 <br /><br />It appears that \"Project Stargate\" refers to a very large-scale initiative focused on building advanced AI infrastructure within the United States. Here's what I've gathered:<br /> * Focus:<br /> * The project centers on the development of massive AI data centers, sometimes referred to as \"AI factories.\"<br /> * It's designed to bolster the nation's capacity for advanced AI computing.<br /> * Scale:<br /> * The projected investment is substantial, with figures reaching up to $500 billion.<br /> * Key Players:<br /> * Companies like OpenAI, Oracle, SoftBank, and Nvidia are reportedly involved.<br /> * It has also been reported that MGX is also one of the initial equity funders.<br /> * Goal:<br /> * The aim is to create the necessary infrastructure to support the rapid growth and development of artificial intelligence technologies.<br /> * It has been reported that the project was unveiled at the white house.<br />In essence, \"Project Stargate\" signifies a major push to establish a powerful AI infrastructure foundation in the U.S.<br />",
"to": [
"https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public"
],
"cc": [
"https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/715165823911600131/followers"
],
"tag": [],
"url": "https://www.minds.com/newsfeed/1746187009182932992",
"published": "2025-03-11T13:23:45+00:00",
"source": {
"content": "In the Bible, GOD created ADAM. Today, the STARGATE PROJECT shall create ADAM 2.0. Here is a quick data rundown on the subject. \n\n---\n##Gemini 2.0 \n\nIt appears that \"Project Stargate\" refers to a very large-scale initiative focused on building advanced AI infrastructure within the United States. Here's what I've gathered:\n * Focus:\n * The project centers on the development of massive AI data centers, sometimes referred to as \"AI factories.\"\n * It's designed to bolster the nation's capacity for advanced AI computing.\n * Scale:\n * The projected investment is substantial, with figures reaching up to $500 billion.\n * Key Players:\n * Companies like OpenAI, Oracle, SoftBank, and Nvidia are reportedly involved.\n * It has also been reported that MGX is also one of the initial equity funders.\n * Goal:\n * The aim is to create the necessary infrastructure to support the rapid growth and development of artificial intelligence technologies.\n * It has been reported that the project was unveiled at the white house.\nIn essence, \"Project Stargate\" signifies a major push to establish a powerful AI infrastructure foundation in the U.S.\n",
"mediaType": "text/plain"
}
},
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/715165823911600131/entities/urn:activity:1746187009182932992/activity"
},
{
"type": "Create",
"actor": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/715165823911600131",
"object": {
"type": "Note",
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/715165823911600131/entities/urn:activity:1745679488983523328",
"attributedTo": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/715165823911600131",
"content": "Remember that time that Hollywood Elite used his influence to feud with Charlie Sheen? The media was used as a tool for character assassination. I believe that exemplifies the Original Sin, as he wasn't even Scapegoated but rather straight up Media Assaulted. I tend to think of what other groups use Media Assault to Character Assassinate individuals, and my old 'religious organization' comes to mind: the Pedophile Ring enabling, Criminal aiding and abetting, international Human Trafficking, and extremist Capital Punishment advocating Church of Scientology. <br /><br />Now I think where we are in the justice system. Through Trump's executive order's, they are going 'hard on crime'. Coming down on immigrants, going after constitutionally protected protesters, and reviving long dead criminal prosecutions in all major cities across the United States, again through Trump's executive orders and back-room dealings, such as with the mayor of NYC, who is being let off the hook for a quid pro quo. Now it comes to mind, all this playing Game of Thrones... they are saying it is for the 'good for the American people', yet he was elected for the sole reason to IMPROVE THE ECONOMY for citizens primarily. This hard on crime thing is crazy, as I seem to remember Trump saying he would 'release UFO/UAP disclosure', make Cryptocurrency boom, and build a high-tech sci-fi city, amongst other promises. If he needs time, he needs to ask the American people. His charge head-first into 'going hard on crime' seems to be a bone to the GOP, particularly the southern folk. This justice thing seems to be a side-track quest to nowhere, yet I get the immigration focus but not the 'big city' focus. What gives Mister President?! Be clear to the American people what your 3-month, 6-month, and Milestone Yearly goals are! Of course, you won but we all want to be <a href=\"https://www.minds.com/search?f=top&t=all&q=winning\" title=\"#winning\" class=\"u-url hashtag\" target=\"_blank\">#winning</a> <a href=\"https://www.minds.com/search?f=top&t=all&q=trump\" title=\"#trump\" class=\"u-url hashtag\" target=\"_blank\">#trump</a> <a href=\"https://www.minds.com/search?f=top&t=all&q=scientology\" title=\"#scientology\" class=\"u-url hashtag\" target=\"_blank\">#scientology</a> <a href=\"https://www.minds.com/search?f=top&t=all&q=charliesheen\" title=\"#charliesheen\" class=\"u-url hashtag\" target=\"_blank\">#charliesheen</a> ",
"to": [
"https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public"
],
"cc": [
"https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/715165823911600131/followers"
],
"tag": [],
"url": "https://www.minds.com/newsfeed/1745679488983523328",
"published": "2025-03-10T03:47:03+00:00",
"attachment": [
{
"type": "Document",
"url": "https://cdn.minds.com/fs/v1/thumbnail/1745679437128540160/xlarge/",
"mediaType": "image/jpeg",
"height": 256,
"width": 300
}
],
"source": {
"content": "Remember that time that Hollywood Elite used his influence to feud with Charlie Sheen? The media was used as a tool for character assassination. I believe that exemplifies the Original Sin, as he wasn't even Scapegoated but rather straight up Media Assaulted. I tend to think of what other groups use Media Assault to Character Assassinate individuals, and my old 'religious organization' comes to mind: the Pedophile Ring enabling, Criminal aiding and abetting, international Human Trafficking, and extremist Capital Punishment advocating Church of Scientology. \n\nNow I think where we are in the justice system. Through Trump's executive order's, they are going 'hard on crime'. Coming down on immigrants, going after constitutionally protected protesters, and reviving long dead criminal prosecutions in all major cities across the United States, again through Trump's executive orders and back-room dealings, such as with the mayor of NYC, who is being let off the hook for a quid pro quo. Now it comes to mind, all this playing Game of Thrones... they are saying it is for the 'good for the American people', yet he was elected for the sole reason to IMPROVE THE ECONOMY for citizens primarily. This hard on crime thing is crazy, as I seem to remember Trump saying he would 'release UFO/UAP disclosure', make Cryptocurrency boom, and build a high-tech sci-fi city, amongst other promises. If he needs time, he needs to ask the American people. His charge head-first into 'going hard on crime' seems to be a bone to the GOP, particularly the southern folk. This justice thing seems to be a side-track quest to nowhere, yet I get the immigration focus but not the 'big city' focus. What gives Mister President?! Be clear to the American people what your 3-month, 6-month, and Milestone Yearly goals are! Of course, you won but we all want to be #winning #trump #scientology #charliesheen ",
"mediaType": "text/plain"
}
},
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/715165823911600131/entities/urn:activity:1745679488983523328/activity"
},
{
"type": "Announce",
"actor": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/715165823911600131",
"object": {
"type": "Note",
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1320568424174194704/entities/urn:activity:1742553906116583424",
"attributedTo": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1320568424174194704",
"content": "<a href=\"https://www.minds.com/search?f=top&t=all&q=minds\" title=\"#minds\" class=\"u-url hashtag\" target=\"_blank\">#minds</a>",
"to": [
"https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public"
],
"cc": [
"https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1320568424174194704/followers"
],
"tag": [],
"url": "https://www.minds.com/newsfeed/1742553906116583424",
"published": "2025-03-01T12:47:06+00:00",
"attachment": [
{
"type": "Document",
"url": "https://cdn.minds.com/fs/v1/thumbnail/1742553873149353984/xlarge/",
"mediaType": "image/jpeg",
"height": 1192,
"width": 968
}
],
"source": {
"content": "#minds",
"mediaType": "text/plain"
}
},
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/715165823911600131/entities/urn:activity:1744626716346687488/activity",
"to": [
"https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public"
],
"cc": [
"https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1320568424174194704",
"https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/715165823911600131/followers"
]
},
{
"type": "Create",
"actor": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/715165823911600131",
"object": {
"type": "Note",
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/715165823911600131/entities/urn:activity:1743745833335001088",
"attributedTo": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/715165823911600131",
"content": "Ok, I don't care about your position on Trump's Gold card. It's happening, whether America First enthusiasts endorse it or not. My concern is with Trump's lackie Grant Cardone. <br /><br />Looks like this finance website, Bengazi or Bengiza or whatever, is probably owned by Scientologists, like Earthlink and ABC Mouse. Nobody else would cite a Scientologist hardline loser who raises millions of dollars for the pedophile-ring enabling, human-trafficking, family-destroying, and advocating 'cruel and unusual punishment' Cult of Scientology. Let me explain that last bit, as the founder of Scientology was L Ron Hubbard, who in his 1960's interview with the BBC, stated or implied that all criminals need to be run out on TR-45. TR-45 is a reference to a .45 caliber gun. Criminals run out via drill TR-45 would be advocating extremist capital-punishment by the state (e.g. A world WITHOUT crime, advocating draconian execution of ALL criminals). <br /><br />It should be noted that Trump has the tyrannical viewpoint of also advocating Capital Punishment of criminals for drug offenses, the same drugs that are now legalized in many states yet illegal federally. This would be an absolute failed policy, given that I totally understand his opinion that China does it and it got rid of their Opium Crisis and he would thus like it to be applied to the US fentanyl crisis. The problem is that Fentanyl is legal for medical purposes, and would potentially end up with a situation where the state executes innocent people, potentially doctors, for 'peddling narcotics' in a legal gray zone. I do not advocate killing of America's highly skilled, highly educated, PhD holders due to errors of Justice. Let's get this straight, the state does not issue Justice fairly or evenly or even remotely accurately or efficiently, do not give them a tool they will misuse like expanded Capital Punishment (something which violates the 8th Amendment in the Bill of Rights under the United States Constitution) The US Constitution is a document that predates Trump for a reason, more intelligent people like Alexander Hamilton and James Madison designed it to prevent tyranny in its leaders, many of the Masons, who signed the Constitution as their acquiescence and acknowledgement to also prevent themselves, who would soon hold office in an administration or legislature under this Constitution, and future Presidents from becoming Tyrants or Dictators like the British Crown was at the time. I don't support the Cult of Scientology doing it, nor would I support the current President going against the Constitution on provisions provided to protect the citizens of the nation in which we exist under, it's laws, it's morals, and it's ethical behavior. Exile them to a penal colony in Alaska, take them out of the hood, put them into a concentration camp, but don't execute, Mr. President. <a href=\"https://www.minds.com/search?f=top&t=all&q=scientology\" title=\"#scientology\" class=\"u-url hashtag\" target=\"_blank\">#scientology</a> <a href=\"https://www.minds.com/search?f=top&t=all&q=grantcardone\" title=\"#grantcardone\" class=\"u-url hashtag\" target=\"_blank\">#grantcardone</a> <a href=\"https://www.minds.com/search?f=top&t=all&q=historylesson\" title=\"#historylesson\" class=\"u-url hashtag\" target=\"_blank\">#historylesson</a><br /><a href=\"https://www.benzinga.com/startups/25/03/44082721/grant-cardone-trumps-gold-card-is-a-smart-way-to-attract-money-and-bring-in-more-conservative-voters\" target=\"_blank\">https://www.benzinga.com/startups/25/03/44082721/grant-cardone-trumps-gold-card-is-a-smart-way-to-attract-money-and-bring-in-more-conservative-voters</a>",
"to": [
"https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public"
],
"cc": [
"https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/715165823911600131/followers"
],
"tag": [],
"url": "https://www.minds.com/newsfeed/1743745833335001088",
"published": "2025-03-04T19:43:23+00:00",
"source": {
"content": "Ok, I don't care about your position on Trump's Gold card. It's happening, whether America First enthusiasts endorse it or not. My concern is with Trump's lackie Grant Cardone. \n\nLooks like this finance website, Bengazi or Bengiza or whatever, is probably owned by Scientologists, like Earthlink and ABC Mouse. Nobody else would cite a Scientologist hardline loser who raises millions of dollars for the pedophile-ring enabling, human-trafficking, family-destroying, and advocating 'cruel and unusual punishment' Cult of Scientology. Let me explain that last bit, as the founder of Scientology was L Ron Hubbard, who in his 1960's interview with the BBC, stated or implied that all criminals need to be run out on TR-45. TR-45 is a reference to a .45 caliber gun. Criminals run out via drill TR-45 would be advocating extremist capital-punishment by the state (e.g. A world WITHOUT crime, advocating draconian execution of ALL criminals). \n\nIt should be noted that Trump has the tyrannical viewpoint of also advocating Capital Punishment of criminals for drug offenses, the same drugs that are now legalized in many states yet illegal federally. This would be an absolute failed policy, given that I totally understand his opinion that China does it and it got rid of their Opium Crisis and he would thus like it to be applied to the US fentanyl crisis. The problem is that Fentanyl is legal for medical purposes, and would potentially end up with a situation where the state executes innocent people, potentially doctors, for 'peddling narcotics' in a legal gray zone. I do not advocate killing of America's highly skilled, highly educated, PhD holders due to errors of Justice. Let's get this straight, the state does not issue Justice fairly or evenly or even remotely accurately or efficiently, do not give them a tool they will misuse like expanded Capital Punishment (something which violates the 8th Amendment in the Bill of Rights under the United States Constitution) The US Constitution is a document that predates Trump for a reason, more intelligent people like Alexander Hamilton and James Madison designed it to prevent tyranny in its leaders, many of the Masons, who signed the Constitution as their acquiescence and acknowledgement to also prevent themselves, who would soon hold office in an administration or legislature under this Constitution, and future Presidents from becoming Tyrants or Dictators like the British Crown was at the time. I don't support the Cult of Scientology doing it, nor would I support the current President going against the Constitution on provisions provided to protect the citizens of the nation in which we exist under, it's laws, it's morals, and it's ethical behavior. Exile them to a penal colony in Alaska, take them out of the hood, put them into a concentration camp, but don't execute, Mr. President. #scientology #grantcardone #historylesson\nhttps://www.benzinga.com/startups/25/03/44082721/grant-cardone-trumps-gold-card-is-a-smart-way-to-attract-money-and-bring-in-more-conservative-voters",
"mediaType": "text/plain"
}
},
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/715165823911600131/entities/urn:activity:1743745833335001088/activity"
}
],
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/715165823911600131/outbox",
"partOf": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/715165823911600131/outboxoutbox"
}