A small tool to view real-world ActivityPub objects as JSON! Enter a URL
or username from Mastodon or a similar service below, and we'll send a
request with
the right
Accept
header
to the server to view the underlying object.
{
"@context": "https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams",
"type": "OrderedCollectionPage",
"orderedItems": [
{
"type": "Create",
"actor": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/710926586492231689",
"object": {
"type": "Note",
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/710926586492231689/entities/urn:activity:904178999373586432",
"attributedTo": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/710926586492231689",
"content": "So I searched for \"minds.com sucks\" to see if others have the same problems.<br /><br />Literally the only one spamming people with positive comments was dave cullen, the one who is POLLUTING everyone's homepage EVEN IF YOU BLOCK HIM!!!!<br /><br />This site is pay to win, a way for content creators to oligopolize your attention while making you think you have a voice, wasting your time.",
"to": [
"https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public"
],
"cc": [
"https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/710926586492231689/followers"
],
"tag": [],
"url": "https://www.minds.com/newsfeed/904178999373586432",
"published": "2018-10-31T01:24:32+00:00",
"source": {
"content": "So I searched for \"minds.com sucks\" to see if others have the same problems.\n\nLiterally the only one spamming people with positive comments was dave cullen, the one who is POLLUTING everyone's homepage EVEN IF YOU BLOCK HIM!!!!\n\nThis site is pay to win, a way for content creators to oligopolize your attention while making you think you have a voice, wasting your time.",
"mediaType": "text/plain"
}
},
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/710926586492231689/entities/urn:activity:904178999373586432/activity"
},
{
"type": "Create",
"actor": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/710926586492231689",
"object": {
"type": "Note",
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/710926586492231689/entities/urn:activity:904176481943937024",
"attributedTo": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/710926586492231689",
"content": "Is there a way to stop seeing Dave Cullen's weak posts everywhere? <br />This is like pollution.<br />I remember this site being very hard to manage, only seems to be useful to content creators making money off monopolizing attention basically. ",
"to": [
"https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public"
],
"cc": [
"https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/710926586492231689/followers"
],
"tag": [],
"url": "https://www.minds.com/newsfeed/904176481943937024",
"published": "2018-10-31T01:14:32+00:00",
"source": {
"content": "Is there a way to stop seeing Dave Cullen's weak posts everywhere? \nThis is like pollution.\nI remember this site being very hard to manage, only seems to be useful to content creators making money off monopolizing attention basically. ",
"mediaType": "text/plain"
}
},
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/710926586492231689/entities/urn:activity:904176481943937024/activity"
},
{
"type": "Create",
"actor": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/710926586492231689",
"object": {
"type": "Note",
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/710926586492231689/entities/urn:activity:880905251195191296",
"attributedTo": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/710926586492231689",
"content": "<a class=\"u-url mention\" href=\"https://www.minds.com/MrMetokur\" target=\"_blank\">@MrMetokur</a> was just suspended from twitter.<br /><br />Talking about the jewish mass shooter didn't go to well.",
"to": [
"https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public"
],
"cc": [
"https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/710926586492231689/followers"
],
"tag": [
{
"type": "Mention",
"href": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/645438357765103634",
"name": "@MrMetokur"
}
],
"url": "https://www.minds.com/newsfeed/880905251195191296",
"published": "2018-08-27T20:02:58+00:00",
"source": {
"content": "@MrMetokur was just suspended from twitter.\n\nTalking about the jewish mass shooter didn't go to well.",
"mediaType": "text/plain"
}
},
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/710926586492231689/entities/urn:activity:880905251195191296/activity"
},
{
"type": "Create",
"actor": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/710926586492231689",
"object": {
"type": "Note",
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/710926586492231689/entities/urn:activity:833808893292068864",
"attributedTo": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/710926586492231689",
"content": "Can you guys see this post?<br /><br />Checking traffic.",
"to": [
"https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public"
],
"cc": [
"https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/710926586492231689/followers"
],
"tag": [],
"url": "https://www.minds.com/newsfeed/833808893292068864",
"published": "2018-04-19T20:58:51+00:00",
"source": {
"content": "Can you guys see this post?\n\nChecking traffic.",
"mediaType": "text/plain"
}
},
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/710926586492231689/entities/urn:activity:833808893292068864/activity"
},
{
"type": "Create",
"actor": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/710926586492231689",
"object": {
"type": "Note",
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/710926586492231689/entities/urn:activity:833808827990949888",
"attributedTo": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/710926586492231689",
"content": "Activity Check",
"to": [
"https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public"
],
"cc": [
"https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/710926586492231689/followers"
],
"tag": [],
"url": "https://www.minds.com/newsfeed/833808827990949888",
"published": "2018-04-19T20:58:35+00:00",
"source": {
"content": "Activity Check",
"mediaType": "text/plain"
}
},
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/710926586492231689/entities/urn:activity:833808827990949888/activity"
},
{
"type": "Create",
"actor": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/710926586492231689",
"object": {
"type": "Note",
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/710926586492231689/entities/urn:activity:754374560538697734",
"attributedTo": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/710926586492231689",
"content": "this video has been censored<br /><br />anything can be censored then..<br /><br />let people know",
"to": [
"https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public"
],
"cc": [
"https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/710926586492231689/followers",
"https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/618149233068875788"
],
"tag": [],
"url": "https://www.minds.com/newsfeed/754374560538697734",
"published": "2017-09-12T16:15:10+00:00",
"inReplyTo": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/618149233068875788/entities/urn:activity:754171520196026368",
"source": {
"content": "this video has been censored\n\nanything can be censored then..\n\nlet people know",
"mediaType": "text/plain"
}
},
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/710926586492231689/entities/urn:activity:754374560538697734/activity"
},
{
"type": "Create",
"actor": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/710926586492231689",
"object": {
"type": "Note",
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/710926586492231689/entities/urn:activity:741433395640279040",
"attributedTo": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/710926586492231689",
"content": "<br /><br />This is a lose lose situation that sargon is shamefully taking advantage of, based on hate speech legislation.<br />The question is:<br />“Is there a single one of you that thinks the holocaust was wrong?”<br />Obviously he’s not looking for an answer to this question as no one believes everyone supports it. At worst they’ll think it’s a significant portion.<br />Really, it’s more an insult than a question, to imply that every member of a movement would support genocide. But it’s more insidious than that<br />But this is the dynamic he’s using.<br />First of all it’s a loaded question, implying it happened. Now, he knows many in the Alt Right don’t believe the official story. Most still believe millions died, but they will doubt three key aspects. The number, the manner and if Hitler gave the order. The jq is related to this but doesn’t rely on it.<br />Still he doesn’t ask “If it happened”, or generally “is all genocide wrong” he makes a claim that is illegal to refute.<br />And this is what he’s taking advantage of.<br />So here are all the scenarios from then on that don’t include lying.<br />For people who believe the holocaust happened.<br />1.) They answer “Yes it was wrong”. But in saying so they abandon friends that don’t believe in it. They leave them isolated. And this is a key component in the Alt Right, solidarity. No matter out political ideology, when one is attacked we stand as one against it, we don’t like to add caveats like “oh I don’t agree with that”,<br />That would be the equivalent of pretending to defend your friend from bullies but really you just stand in the corner telling them how bad people they are, it’s impersonal and ineffective. Almost as bad as the skeptics on Andy’s stream, attacking and disassociating from rage for wrongthing to appease their opposition with predictable results. - Reduce comradery in the community, bullies are empowered. (both to a lesser degree than directly saying it or disassociating, but still has an effect)<br />2.) You add “if it happened”, the usual approach, but then you’re seen as a denier yourself, leaving a false impression of your position, leaving your uninvested non Alt Right fans vulnerable to be attacked and discouraged in fear of sharing your content as a suspected thought criminal and becoming legally vulnerable yourself, after which there are two options. <br />A.) Refuse to acknowledge it and face possible (often indirect through corrupted police terrorizing the public) legal and social consequences affecting you and your family and worsen the fear of your outer audience cycle. – one member down, instilled fear in audience the Alt Right tries to reach<br />B.) Acknowledge it directly and leave your friends more isolated. - Reduce comradery in the community, bullies are empowered.<br />For people who don’t accept the story.<br />1.) They directly deny it with full legal consequences and the results already described.<br />2.) Refuse to acknowledge it with a similar effect.<br />All those being undesirable, and with little to nothing gained in return, most people will ignore sargon’s insulting question <br />And keep in mind, denying or accepting the holocaust has no effect on the Alt Right message. No one needs to promote it, they just happen to believe it. Sure it can act as a gateway, people are surprised to learn so much more about it they’ve never heard before and they look into more narratives, even if the first one that surprised them turned out to be false, it still lead them to legitimate dispelling of other myths.<br />But there are many alternatives to this.<br />And people like sargon, smugly relying on the pressure of the law to hurt a movement, he is ignorant on the issue himself. Once using a badly translated quote of an official to justify his belief. Even if every single detail on the holocaust story is more or less true, sargon has no right to act above those who don’t believe in it, because even they have looked into it more than he has, and when to take one side of the debate is persecuted in more than a few ways suppressing its literature and development, to take the other side so casually while disrespecting the first is hypocritical and cowardly. Even if you don’t agree, you should defend their right instead of claiming to do so and then use the law against them in the underhanded way sargon did.<br /><br /><br />ultimately he said he didn't care if people believed in the holocaust, doesn't matter, he still started it this way, the dynamics of the situation had taken place before he changed his focus, he doesn't have to be the one to take advantage of any of this after it takes place, his fans and stalkers will, as they predictably did",
"to": [
"https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public"
],
"cc": [
"https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/710926586492231689/followers"
],
"tag": [],
"url": "https://www.minds.com/newsfeed/741433395640279040",
"published": "2017-08-07T23:11:36+00:00",
"source": {
"content": "\n\nThis is a lose lose situation that sargon is shamefully taking advantage of, based on hate speech legislation.\nThe question is:\n“Is there a single one of you that thinks the holocaust was wrong?”\nObviously he’s not looking for an answer to this question as no one believes everyone supports it. At worst they’ll think it’s a significant portion.\nReally, it’s more an insult than a question, to imply that every member of a movement would support genocide. But it’s more insidious than that\nBut this is the dynamic he’s using.\nFirst of all it’s a loaded question, implying it happened. Now, he knows many in the Alt Right don’t believe the official story. Most still believe millions died, but they will doubt three key aspects. The number, the manner and if Hitler gave the order. The jq is related to this but doesn’t rely on it.\nStill he doesn’t ask “If it happened”, or generally “is all genocide wrong” he makes a claim that is illegal to refute.\nAnd this is what he’s taking advantage of.\nSo here are all the scenarios from then on that don’t include lying.\nFor people who believe the holocaust happened.\n1.) They answer “Yes it was wrong”. But in saying so they abandon friends that don’t believe in it. They leave them isolated. And this is a key component in the Alt Right, solidarity. No matter out political ideology, when one is attacked we stand as one against it, we don’t like to add caveats like “oh I don’t agree with that”,\nThat would be the equivalent of pretending to defend your friend from bullies but really you just stand in the corner telling them how bad people they are, it’s impersonal and ineffective. Almost as bad as the skeptics on Andy’s stream, attacking and disassociating from rage for wrongthing to appease their opposition with predictable results. - Reduce comradery in the community, bullies are empowered. (both to a lesser degree than directly saying it or disassociating, but still has an effect)\n2.) You add “if it happened”, the usual approach, but then you’re seen as a denier yourself, leaving a false impression of your position, leaving your uninvested non Alt Right fans vulnerable to be attacked and discouraged in fear of sharing your content as a suspected thought criminal and becoming legally vulnerable yourself, after which there are two options. \nA.) Refuse to acknowledge it and face possible (often indirect through corrupted police terrorizing the public) legal and social consequences affecting you and your family and worsen the fear of your outer audience cycle. – one member down, instilled fear in audience the Alt Right tries to reach\nB.) Acknowledge it directly and leave your friends more isolated. - Reduce comradery in the community, bullies are empowered.\nFor people who don’t accept the story.\n1.) They directly deny it with full legal consequences and the results already described.\n2.) Refuse to acknowledge it with a similar effect.\nAll those being undesirable, and with little to nothing gained in return, most people will ignore sargon’s insulting question \nAnd keep in mind, denying or accepting the holocaust has no effect on the Alt Right message. No one needs to promote it, they just happen to believe it. Sure it can act as a gateway, people are surprised to learn so much more about it they’ve never heard before and they look into more narratives, even if the first one that surprised them turned out to be false, it still lead them to legitimate dispelling of other myths.\nBut there are many alternatives to this.\nAnd people like sargon, smugly relying on the pressure of the law to hurt a movement, he is ignorant on the issue himself. Once using a badly translated quote of an official to justify his belief. Even if every single detail on the holocaust story is more or less true, sargon has no right to act above those who don’t believe in it, because even they have looked into it more than he has, and when to take one side of the debate is persecuted in more than a few ways suppressing its literature and development, to take the other side so casually while disrespecting the first is hypocritical and cowardly. Even if you don’t agree, you should defend their right instead of claiming to do so and then use the law against them in the underhanded way sargon did.\n\n\nultimately he said he didn't care if people believed in the holocaust, doesn't matter, he still started it this way, the dynamics of the situation had taken place before he changed his focus, he doesn't have to be the one to take advantage of any of this after it takes place, his fans and stalkers will, as they predictably did",
"mediaType": "text/plain"
}
},
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/710926586492231689/entities/urn:activity:741433395640279040/activity"
},
{
"type": "Create",
"actor": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/710926586492231689",
"object": {
"type": "Note",
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/710926586492231689/entities/urn:activity:741362653233946625",
"attributedTo": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/710926586492231689",
"content": "My response to sargon on his baitey holocaust question.<br /><br />\"You are switching between two scenarios.<br />First you ask directly about the holocaust as we know it, and then you then broaden the question infinitely, additionally you sneak in the assumption that jews, as a whole, would have destroyed Germany, leading people into a theoretical answer to a previously specific question, inevitably leaving a false impression. <br /><br />Almost looks like that’s what you’re were counting on.<br />By keeping the question open, and worse, assigning theoretical guilt on millions, you’re including a larger scale version of the classical trolley dilemma.<br /><br />On the trolley dilemma you’re asked if you would kill a few to save many. Not even guilt is assigned to any of them.<br /><br />To make it even remotely analogous to the second version of your question, you’d have to include your family in the large group and assign hostile intent against your family in some members of the small group.<br />If you would make the choice to save your family in this example then what answer follows that you’d give your own question.<br /><br />Making a theoretical choice there, since it would include any scenario, wouldn’t make one a genocide supporter any more than making a choice on the trolley dilemma makes one a murderer. <br /><br />It is a choice between two holocausts, which is what is implied by “destroying germany” as you said. There is no correct answer, it’s a misleading question that would leave anyone trying to answer it looking more like a genocide supporter than before, including you.\"<br />",
"to": [
"https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public"
],
"cc": [
"https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/710926586492231689/followers"
],
"tag": [],
"url": "https://www.minds.com/newsfeed/741362653233946625",
"published": "2017-08-07T18:30:29+00:00",
"source": {
"content": "My response to sargon on his baitey holocaust question.\n\n\"You are switching between two scenarios.\nFirst you ask directly about the holocaust as we know it, and then you then broaden the question infinitely, additionally you sneak in the assumption that jews, as a whole, would have destroyed Germany, leading people into a theoretical answer to a previously specific question, inevitably leaving a false impression. \n\nAlmost looks like that’s what you’re were counting on.\nBy keeping the question open, and worse, assigning theoretical guilt on millions, you’re including a larger scale version of the classical trolley dilemma.\n\nOn the trolley dilemma you’re asked if you would kill a few to save many. Not even guilt is assigned to any of them.\n\nTo make it even remotely analogous to the second version of your question, you’d have to include your family in the large group and assign hostile intent against your family in some members of the small group.\nIf you would make the choice to save your family in this example then what answer follows that you’d give your own question.\n\nMaking a theoretical choice there, since it would include any scenario, wouldn’t make one a genocide supporter any more than making a choice on the trolley dilemma makes one a murderer. \n\nIt is a choice between two holocausts, which is what is implied by “destroying germany” as you said. There is no correct answer, it’s a misleading question that would leave anyone trying to answer it looking more like a genocide supporter than before, including you.\"\n",
"mediaType": "text/plain"
}
},
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/710926586492231689/entities/urn:activity:741362653233946625/activity"
}
],
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/710926586492231689/outbox",
"partOf": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/710926586492231689/outboxoutbox"
}