A small tool to view real-world ActivityPub objects as JSON! Enter a URL
or username from Mastodon or a similar service below, and we'll send a
request with
the right
Accept
header
to the server to view the underlying object.
{
"@context": "https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams",
"type": "OrderedCollectionPage",
"orderedItems": [
{
"type": "Create",
"actor": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/698115654212919313",
"object": {
"type": "Note",
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/698115654212919313/entities/urn:activity:1785461810351050752",
"attributedTo": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/698115654212919313",
"content": "_Beginning to Lock Them Up: Ex-FBI Dir. Wray Referred for Criminal Prosecution Related to 2020 Voter Fraud_<br /><br />FTA: Former FBI Director Christopher Wray was referred on Thursday for criminal prosecution by the Oversight Project, which drafted a report alleging that he lied to Congress about voter fraud, and gave false testimony regarding the agency’s targeting of Catholics.<br /><br />Current Bureau Director Kash Patel already announced that he’d found “an intelligence report from August 2020 that detailed ‘alarming allegations’ regarding an apparent Chinese communist plot to interfere in the presidential election for the benefit of then-candidate Joe Biden,” The Blaze reported.<br /><br />These documents would have been potentially helpful to President Donald Trump four years ago, when he raised concerns about voter fraud helping Biden garner over 81-million votes.<br /><br />“Former FBI leadership withheld the facts and misled the public on China’s 2020 election interference,” Patel said Thursday. “And they did so for political gain.”<br /><br />“We’re restoring trust — through transparency, not politics,” he added.<br /><br /><a href=\"https://www.westernjournal.com/beginning-lock-ex-fbi-dir-wray-referred-criminal-prosecution-related-2020-voter-fraud/\" target=\"_blank\">https://www.westernjournal.com/beginning-lock-ex-fbi-dir-wray-referred-criminal-prosecution-related-2020-voter-fraud/</a>",
"to": [
"https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public"
],
"cc": [
"https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/698115654212919313/followers"
],
"tag": [],
"url": "https://www.minds.com/newsfeed/1785461810351050752",
"published": "2025-06-27T22:27:47+00:00",
"source": {
"content": "_Beginning to Lock Them Up: Ex-FBI Dir. Wray Referred for Criminal Prosecution Related to 2020 Voter Fraud_\n\nFTA: Former FBI Director Christopher Wray was referred on Thursday for criminal prosecution by the Oversight Project, which drafted a report alleging that he lied to Congress about voter fraud, and gave false testimony regarding the agency’s targeting of Catholics.\n\nCurrent Bureau Director Kash Patel already announced that he’d found “an intelligence report from August 2020 that detailed ‘alarming allegations’ regarding an apparent Chinese communist plot to interfere in the presidential election for the benefit of then-candidate Joe Biden,” The Blaze reported.\n\nThese documents would have been potentially helpful to President Donald Trump four years ago, when he raised concerns about voter fraud helping Biden garner over 81-million votes.\n\n“Former FBI leadership withheld the facts and misled the public on China’s 2020 election interference,” Patel said Thursday. “And they did so for political gain.”\n\n“We’re restoring trust — through transparency, not politics,” he added.\n\nhttps://www.westernjournal.com/beginning-lock-ex-fbi-dir-wray-referred-criminal-prosecution-related-2020-voter-fraud/",
"mediaType": "text/plain"
}
},
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/698115654212919313/entities/urn:activity:1785461810351050752/activity"
},
{
"type": "Create",
"actor": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/698115654212919313",
"object": {
"type": "Note",
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/698115654212919313/entities/urn:activity:1785358788526612480",
"attributedTo": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/698115654212919313",
"content": "**_SCOTUS Hands Trump a Landmark Victory: Nationwide Injunctions Are Dead_**<br /><br />This IS the final word.<br /><br />FTA: In Trump v. CASA, Inc. (Nos. 24A884-86), the Supreme Court of the United States delivered a thunderclap decision that will be studied for generations. Writing for the six-justice majority, Justice Amy Coney Barrett drove a stake through the heart of this lawless judicial practice. Her opinion, grounded in the Judiciary Act of 1789 and the practices of English chancery courts, affirms what the Constitution's framers long understood: judges are not emperors.<br /><br />The Court's holding was surgical and restrained. It did not opine on the substance of President Trump's Executive Order 14160, which reinterprets birthright citizenship in line with originalist principles. Rather, it addressed a procedural abuse that had metastasized over the past decade: the universal injunction. Justice Barrett explained that the equitable authority granted by Congress in the Judiciary Act of 1789 does not authorize such sweeping remedies. No practice \"remotely like a national injunction\" existed in the equity courts of 1789. Thus, the federal judiciary cannot claim such power today.<br /><br />To grasp the importance of this ruling, consider the alternative. Over the past decade, district judges in Hawaii, San Francisco, and elsewhere transformed themselves into de facto super-legislators. One judge, one courthouse, one plaintiff, and suddenly, the President of the United States found his policies frozen nationwide. Not just enjoined for the litigants before the court, but for all Americans, including those who never consented to the litigation. This, the Court rightly held, is incompatible with constitutional design.<br /><br />Justice Clarence Thomas, in a trenchant concurrence joined by Justice Gorsuch, pushed the argument further, grounding it in Article III of the Constitution itself. Courts have jurisdiction over \"cases\" and \"controversies,\" not abstract national mandates. The idea that a single judge could bind non-parties across the entire country, Thomas observed, is a jurisprudential absurdity. He likened such sweeping decrees to advisory opinions, a practice specifically forbidden by the Constitution's framers.<br /><br />Justice Alito, joined by Thomas, focused on the institutional consequences of allowing such injunctions to proliferate. He warned that nationwide injunctions encouraged judicial grandstanding, forum shopping, and an escalating war of tit-for-tat rulings, eroding respect for the judiciary as a neutral arbiter. Kavanaugh, in a separate concurrence, praised the restraint shown by the majority while agreeing on the core problem: no judge may bind non-parties absent the procedural safeguards provided by Rule 23's class action framework.<br /><br />The majority was explicit: complete relief means relief for the plaintiffs, not the polity. The respondents, including individual mothers, advocacy groups, and three states, may seek injunctions on behalf of themselves. But they may not, without proper procedural channels, hand a judicial veto to the rest of the country. As Justice Barrett noted, such rulings create friction between the judiciary and the executive, freezing policies before appellate review and violating norms of institutional comity.<br /><br /><a href=\"https://amuseonx.substack.com/p/scotus-hands-trump-a-landmark-victory\" target=\"_blank\">https://amuseonx.substack.com/p/scotus-hands-trump-a-landmark-victory</a>",
"to": [
"https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public"
],
"cc": [
"https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/698115654212919313/followers"
],
"tag": [],
"url": "https://www.minds.com/newsfeed/1785358788526612480",
"published": "2025-06-27T15:38:25+00:00",
"source": {
"content": "**_SCOTUS Hands Trump a Landmark Victory: Nationwide Injunctions Are Dead_**\n\nThis IS the final word.\n\nFTA: In Trump v. CASA, Inc. (Nos. 24A884-86), the Supreme Court of the United States delivered a thunderclap decision that will be studied for generations. Writing for the six-justice majority, Justice Amy Coney Barrett drove a stake through the heart of this lawless judicial practice. Her opinion, grounded in the Judiciary Act of 1789 and the practices of English chancery courts, affirms what the Constitution's framers long understood: judges are not emperors.\n\nThe Court's holding was surgical and restrained. It did not opine on the substance of President Trump's Executive Order 14160, which reinterprets birthright citizenship in line with originalist principles. Rather, it addressed a procedural abuse that had metastasized over the past decade: the universal injunction. Justice Barrett explained that the equitable authority granted by Congress in the Judiciary Act of 1789 does not authorize such sweeping remedies. No practice \"remotely like a national injunction\" existed in the equity courts of 1789. Thus, the federal judiciary cannot claim such power today.\n\nTo grasp the importance of this ruling, consider the alternative. Over the past decade, district judges in Hawaii, San Francisco, and elsewhere transformed themselves into de facto super-legislators. One judge, one courthouse, one plaintiff, and suddenly, the President of the United States found his policies frozen nationwide. Not just enjoined for the litigants before the court, but for all Americans, including those who never consented to the litigation. This, the Court rightly held, is incompatible with constitutional design.\n\nJustice Clarence Thomas, in a trenchant concurrence joined by Justice Gorsuch, pushed the argument further, grounding it in Article III of the Constitution itself. Courts have jurisdiction over \"cases\" and \"controversies,\" not abstract national mandates. The idea that a single judge could bind non-parties across the entire country, Thomas observed, is a jurisprudential absurdity. He likened such sweeping decrees to advisory opinions, a practice specifically forbidden by the Constitution's framers.\n\nJustice Alito, joined by Thomas, focused on the institutional consequences of allowing such injunctions to proliferate. He warned that nationwide injunctions encouraged judicial grandstanding, forum shopping, and an escalating war of tit-for-tat rulings, eroding respect for the judiciary as a neutral arbiter. Kavanaugh, in a separate concurrence, praised the restraint shown by the majority while agreeing on the core problem: no judge may bind non-parties absent the procedural safeguards provided by Rule 23's class action framework.\n\nThe majority was explicit: complete relief means relief for the plaintiffs, not the polity. The respondents, including individual mothers, advocacy groups, and three states, may seek injunctions on behalf of themselves. But they may not, without proper procedural channels, hand a judicial veto to the rest of the country. As Justice Barrett noted, such rulings create friction between the judiciary and the executive, freezing policies before appellate review and violating norms of institutional comity.\n\nhttps://amuseonx.substack.com/p/scotus-hands-trump-a-landmark-victory",
"mediaType": "text/plain"
}
},
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/698115654212919313/entities/urn:activity:1785358788526612480/activity"
},
{
"type": "Create",
"actor": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/698115654212919313",
"object": {
"type": "Note",
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/698115654212919313/entities/urn:activity:1785356679131435008",
"attributedTo": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/698115654212919313",
"content": "_Supreme Court Slaps Down Activist Judges In Birthright Citizenship, LGBTQ Schoolbook Cases_<br /><br />6-3; not the final word, but indicative of what that will ultimately be.<br /><br /><a href=\"https://www.zerohedge.com/political/supreme-court-slaps-down-activist-judges-lets-trumps-birthright-citizenship-eo-go-effect\" target=\"_blank\">https://www.zerohedge.com/political/supreme-court-slaps-down-activist-judges-lets-trumps-birthright-citizenship-eo-go-effect</a>",
"to": [
"https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public"
],
"cc": [
"https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/698115654212919313/followers"
],
"tag": [],
"url": "https://www.minds.com/newsfeed/1785356679131435008",
"published": "2025-06-27T15:30:02+00:00",
"source": {
"content": "_Supreme Court Slaps Down Activist Judges In Birthright Citizenship, LGBTQ Schoolbook Cases_\n\n6-3; not the final word, but indicative of what that will ultimately be.\n\nhttps://www.zerohedge.com/political/supreme-court-slaps-down-activist-judges-lets-trumps-birthright-citizenship-eo-go-effect",
"mediaType": "text/plain"
}
},
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/698115654212919313/entities/urn:activity:1785356679131435008/activity"
},
{
"type": "Create",
"actor": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/698115654212919313",
"object": {
"type": "Note",
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/698115654212919313/entities/urn:activity:1785355302785376256",
"attributedTo": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/698115654212919313",
"content": "_Teens Face HATE CRIME Charges For Cutting Up PRIDE FLAGS, Communism Is Becoming LAW In The US_<br /><br />Note: The video’s “communism” claim highlights fears of overreach, but my focus is hate crime laws’ threat to free speech.<br /><br />In the cited case, teens cutting Pride flags faced hate crime charges. My view is that vandalism and/or 'destruction of property' would be completely appropriate charges in this specific instance. I'm adamantly opposed to the concept of \"hate crime,\" for the following reasons:<br /><br />'Hate crime’ laws risk becoming thought crimes by punishing motives, not just actions, threatening free speech. Constitutional clauses like ‘the right of the people’ to speech, arms, or privacy are vulnerable to judicial reinterpretation. The Second Amendment, unchanged since 1791, once barred gun restrictions but now allows California’s laws (Heller, 2008), and the Fourth Amendment’s protections were limited for customer records held by firms by redefining privacy expectations (United States v. Miller, 1976). <br /><br />Courts could similarly narrow ‘the people’ or ‘speech,’ eroding First Amendment rights. For instance, burning a U.S. flag, protected in Texas v. Johnson (1989), could be a hate crime if bias-motivated and deemed intimidating, showing motive drives punishment. <br /><br />Hate crime laws don’t require politically neutral or morally sound underlying crimes. The Fugitive Slave Act of 1850 criminalized aiding escaped slaves, an unethical law, proving criminalization isn’t just. In California, where I live, misgendering is civil harassment under SB 219, and progressive advocacy, echoed in Canada’s Bill C-16 and UK arrests for transphobic posts under the Communications Act 2003, pushes for criminalization. <br /><br />If ideological laws—left-wing like misgendering bans or right-wing like Florida’s anti-protest law (HB 1, 2021)—became crimes, they could underlie hate crimes, amplifying politicized prosecutions. The UK’s criminalization of U.S.-protected speech and constitutional shifts like Dobbs (2022) warn of what’s possible if First Amendment protections weaken. <br /><br />As a Californian, I urge resisting hate crime expansions and ideological criminal laws to preserve free speech, wary of judicial redefinitions and global trends.<br /><br />I’m also adamantly opposed to sentencing laws that depend on the intent of the convicted person. The only valid purpose for intent is its use in determining whether an act is a crime in the first place (actus reus, mens rea, scienter). By limiting intent to defining crimes, we avoid punishing beliefs, as hate crime enhancements risk doing, and protect free speech from UK-style overreach or ideological laws like misgendering bans.”<br /><br /><a href=\"https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oF8dHBPf72g\" target=\"_blank\">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oF8dHBPf72g</a>",
"to": [
"https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public"
],
"cc": [
"https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/698115654212919313/followers"
],
"tag": [],
"url": "https://www.minds.com/newsfeed/1785355302785376256",
"published": "2025-06-27T15:24:34+00:00",
"source": {
"content": "_Teens Face HATE CRIME Charges For Cutting Up PRIDE FLAGS, Communism Is Becoming LAW In The US_\n\nNote: The video’s “communism” claim highlights fears of overreach, but my focus is hate crime laws’ threat to free speech.\n\nIn the cited case, teens cutting Pride flags faced hate crime charges. My view is that vandalism and/or 'destruction of property' would be completely appropriate charges in this specific instance. I'm adamantly opposed to the concept of \"hate crime,\" for the following reasons:\n\n'Hate crime’ laws risk becoming thought crimes by punishing motives, not just actions, threatening free speech. Constitutional clauses like ‘the right of the people’ to speech, arms, or privacy are vulnerable to judicial reinterpretation. The Second Amendment, unchanged since 1791, once barred gun restrictions but now allows California’s laws (Heller, 2008), and the Fourth Amendment’s protections were limited for customer records held by firms by redefining privacy expectations (United States v. Miller, 1976). \n\nCourts could similarly narrow ‘the people’ or ‘speech,’ eroding First Amendment rights. For instance, burning a U.S. flag, protected in Texas v. Johnson (1989), could be a hate crime if bias-motivated and deemed intimidating, showing motive drives punishment. \n\nHate crime laws don’t require politically neutral or morally sound underlying crimes. The Fugitive Slave Act of 1850 criminalized aiding escaped slaves, an unethical law, proving criminalization isn’t just. In California, where I live, misgendering is civil harassment under SB 219, and progressive advocacy, echoed in Canada’s Bill C-16 and UK arrests for transphobic posts under the Communications Act 2003, pushes for criminalization. \n\nIf ideological laws—left-wing like misgendering bans or right-wing like Florida’s anti-protest law (HB 1, 2021)—became crimes, they could underlie hate crimes, amplifying politicized prosecutions. The UK’s criminalization of U.S.-protected speech and constitutional shifts like Dobbs (2022) warn of what’s possible if First Amendment protections weaken. \n\nAs a Californian, I urge resisting hate crime expansions and ideological criminal laws to preserve free speech, wary of judicial redefinitions and global trends.\n\nI’m also adamantly opposed to sentencing laws that depend on the intent of the convicted person. The only valid purpose for intent is its use in determining whether an act is a crime in the first place (actus reus, mens rea, scienter). By limiting intent to defining crimes, we avoid punishing beliefs, as hate crime enhancements risk doing, and protect free speech from UK-style overreach or ideological laws like misgendering bans.”\n\nhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oF8dHBPf72g",
"mediaType": "text/plain"
}
},
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/698115654212919313/entities/urn:activity:1785355302785376256/activity"
},
{
"type": "Create",
"actor": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/698115654212919313",
"object": {
"type": "Note",
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/698115654212919313/entities/urn:activity:1785091450812243968",
"attributedTo": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/698115654212919313",
"content": "<a href=\"https://x.com/elonmusk/status/1938254253027717270\" target=\"_blank\">https://x.com/elonmusk/status/1938254253027717270</a>",
"to": [
"https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public"
],
"cc": [
"https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/698115654212919313/followers"
],
"tag": [],
"url": "https://www.minds.com/newsfeed/1785091450812243968",
"published": "2025-06-26T21:56:07+00:00",
"attachment": [
{
"type": "Document",
"url": "https://cdn.minds.com/fs/v1/thumbnail/1785091440573943808/xlarge/",
"mediaType": "image/jpeg",
"height": 1179,
"width": 1053
}
],
"source": {
"content": "https://x.com/elonmusk/status/1938254253027717270",
"mediaType": "text/plain"
}
},
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/698115654212919313/entities/urn:activity:1785091450812243968/activity"
},
{
"type": "Create",
"actor": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/698115654212919313",
"object": {
"type": "Note",
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/698115654212919313/entities/urn:activity:1785047009628004352",
"attributedTo": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/698115654212919313",
"content": "<a href=\"https://x.com/WarClandestine/status/1938309338638250252\" target=\"_blank\">https://x.com/WarClandestine/status/1938309338638250252</a>",
"to": [
"https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public"
],
"cc": [
"https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/698115654212919313/followers"
],
"tag": [],
"url": "https://www.minds.com/newsfeed/1785047009628004352",
"published": "2025-06-26T18:59:31+00:00",
"attachment": [
{
"type": "Document",
"url": "https://cdn.minds.com/fs/v1/thumbnail/1785046987196866560/xlarge/",
"mediaType": "image/jpeg",
"height": 938,
"width": 904
}
],
"source": {
"content": "https://x.com/WarClandestine/status/1938309338638250252",
"mediaType": "text/plain"
}
},
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/698115654212919313/entities/urn:activity:1785047009628004352/activity"
},
{
"type": "Create",
"actor": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/698115654212919313",
"object": {
"type": "Note",
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/698115654212919313/entities/urn:activity:1785030682198794240",
"attributedTo": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/698115654212919313",
"content": "Evil is required in order for free will to exist. How can souls learn why they should choose good, if they never experience the consequences of their free choices? How else can they learn to respect the free will of others?<br /><br />In other words, righteousness evolves organically from free will and karma. And by happening in that way, it actually means something.<br /><br />Does that dynamic not qualify as a 'higher purpose'?<br /><br /><a href=\"https://social.teci.world/@greyknight@noauthority.social/posts/AvWoh3iInmkBZJabSq\" target=\"_blank\">https://social.teci.world/@greyknight@noauthority.social/posts/AvWoh3iInmkBZJabSq</a>",
"to": [
"https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public"
],
"cc": [
"https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/698115654212919313/followers"
],
"tag": [],
"url": "https://www.minds.com/newsfeed/1785030682198794240",
"published": "2025-06-26T17:54:38+00:00",
"attachment": [
{
"type": "Document",
"url": "https://cdn.minds.com/fs/v1/thumbnail/1785030671245254656/xlarge/",
"mediaType": "image/jpeg",
"height": 1322,
"width": 979
}
],
"source": {
"content": "Evil is required in order for free will to exist. How can souls learn why they should choose good, if they never experience the consequences of their free choices? How else can they learn to respect the free will of others?\n\nIn other words, righteousness evolves organically from free will and karma. And by happening in that way, it actually means something.\n\nDoes that dynamic not qualify as a 'higher purpose'?\n\nhttps://social.teci.world/@greyknight@noauthority.social/posts/AvWoh3iInmkBZJabSq",
"mediaType": "text/plain"
}
},
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/698115654212919313/entities/urn:activity:1785030682198794240/activity"
},
{
"type": "Create",
"actor": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/698115654212919313",
"object": {
"type": "Note",
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/698115654212919313/entities/urn:activity:1785026802721230848",
"attributedTo": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/698115654212919313",
"content": "<a href=\"https://www.minds.com/newsfeed/1785026802721230848\" target=\"_blank\">https://www.minds.com/newsfeed/1785026802721230848</a>",
"to": [
"https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public"
],
"cc": [
"https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/698115654212919313/followers"
],
"tag": [],
"url": "https://www.minds.com/newsfeed/1785026802721230848",
"published": "2025-06-26T17:39:13+00:00",
"attachment": [
{
"type": "Document",
"url": "https://cdn.minds.com/fs/v1/thumbnail/1785026791405002752/xlarge/",
"mediaType": "image/jpeg",
"height": 678,
"width": 680
}
],
"source": {
"content": "https://www.minds.com/newsfeed/1785026802721230848",
"mediaType": "text/plain"
}
},
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/698115654212919313/entities/urn:activity:1785026802721230848/activity"
},
{
"type": "Create",
"actor": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/698115654212919313",
"object": {
"type": "Note",
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/698115654212919313/entities/urn:activity:1785026215476727808",
"attributedTo": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/698115654212919313",
"content": "<a href=\"https://x.com/theallinpod/status/1937567726194893129\" target=\"_blank\">https://x.com/theallinpod/status/1937567726194893129</a>",
"to": [
"https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public"
],
"cc": [
"https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/698115654212919313/followers"
],
"tag": [],
"url": "https://www.minds.com/newsfeed/1785026215476727808",
"published": "2025-06-26T17:36:53+00:00",
"attachment": [
{
"type": "Document",
"url": "https://cdn.minds.com/fs/v1/thumbnail/1785026203191615488/xlarge/",
"mediaType": "image/jpeg",
"height": 1280,
"width": 596
}
],
"source": {
"content": "https://x.com/theallinpod/status/1937567726194893129",
"mediaType": "text/plain"
}
},
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/698115654212919313/entities/urn:activity:1785026215476727808/activity"
},
{
"type": "Create",
"actor": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/698115654212919313",
"object": {
"type": "Note",
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/698115654212919313/entities/urn:activity:1785025125404499968",
"attributedTo": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/698115654212919313",
"content": "In other words, the socialists have unwittingly almost completed a 'Cloward-Piven' style strategy against their own creature.<br /><br /><a href=\"https://x.com/sporadicalia/status/1938212916991562051\" target=\"_blank\">https://x.com/sporadicalia/status/1938212916991562051</a>",
"to": [
"https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public"
],
"cc": [
"https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/698115654212919313/followers"
],
"tag": [],
"url": "https://www.minds.com/newsfeed/1785025125404499968",
"published": "2025-06-26T17:32:34+00:00",
"attachment": [
{
"type": "Document",
"url": "https://cdn.minds.com/fs/v1/thumbnail/1785025104281985024/xlarge/",
"mediaType": "image/jpeg",
"height": 812,
"width": 900
}
],
"source": {
"content": "In other words, the socialists have unwittingly almost completed a 'Cloward-Piven' style strategy against their own creature.\n\nhttps://x.com/sporadicalia/status/1938212916991562051",
"mediaType": "text/plain"
}
},
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/698115654212919313/entities/urn:activity:1785025125404499968/activity"
},
{
"type": "Create",
"actor": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/698115654212919313",
"object": {
"type": "Note",
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/698115654212919313/entities/urn:activity:1784664891789942784",
"attributedTo": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/698115654212919313",
"content": "By preponderance of the evidence, I've concluded that the sites were rendered effectively useless.<br /><br /><a href=\"https://x.com/compose/post\" target=\"_blank\">https://x.com/compose/post</a>",
"to": [
"https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public"
],
"cc": [
"https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/698115654212919313/followers"
],
"tag": [],
"url": "https://www.minds.com/newsfeed/1784664891789942784",
"published": "2025-06-25T17:41:07+00:00",
"attachment": [
{
"type": "Document",
"url": "https://cdn.minds.com/fs/v1/thumbnail/1784664878783406080/xlarge/",
"mediaType": "image/jpeg",
"height": 893,
"width": 992
}
],
"source": {
"content": "By preponderance of the evidence, I've concluded that the sites were rendered effectively useless.\n\nhttps://x.com/compose/post",
"mediaType": "text/plain"
}
},
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/698115654212919313/entities/urn:activity:1784664891789942784/activity"
},
{
"type": "Create",
"actor": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/698115654212919313",
"object": {
"type": "Note",
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/698115654212919313/entities/urn:activity:1784647414302138368",
"attributedTo": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/698115654212919313",
"content": "_CNN Reporter Trashes 'Operation Midnight Hammer,' But Her Story Just Fell Apart_<br /><br />The missiles used are specifically designed to cause most of the damage they do deep underground, not on the surface: If they used up all their destructiveness on the surface, they wouldn't be able to do the job they were intended to do.<br /><br />FTA: “Damage to Iran’s three known enrichment facilities, the destruction of Iran’s centrifuge manufacturing capabilities, its uranium conversion facility, uranium metal production plant, and other facilities involved in its nuclear weaponization process, reconstituting these capabilities will take significant time, investment, and energy to return to its previous state before the war or build nuclear weapons. Iran has likely lost close to 20,000 centrifuges at Natanz and Fordow, creating a major bottleneck in any reconstitution effort. Moreover, there has been considerable damage to Iran’s ability to build the nuclear weapon itself.”<br /><br />And there goes the DIA’s centrifuge claim.<br /><br />Albright additionally made the points that negotiations with Iran weren’t going anywhere and that the strikes will further deter Iran.<br /><br />Insufferably outspoken leftist Cenk Uygur even attacked the DIA report, writing, “There’s a new bulls*** leak about how we didn’t destroy Iran’s facilities enough. That means Israel is not done with this war. 99% of the time those types of leaks are either fake intelligence from Israel or a neocon leaking speculative evidence to say we should go back into war.”<br /><br /><a href=\"https://www.westernjournal.com/cnn-reporter-trashes-operation-midnight-hammer-story-just-fell-apart/\" target=\"_blank\">https://www.westernjournal.com/cnn-reporter-trashes-operation-midnight-hammer-story-just-fell-apart/</a>",
"to": [
"https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public"
],
"cc": [
"https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/698115654212919313/followers"
],
"tag": [],
"url": "https://www.minds.com/newsfeed/1784647414302138368",
"published": "2025-06-25T16:31:40+00:00",
"source": {
"content": "_CNN Reporter Trashes 'Operation Midnight Hammer,' But Her Story Just Fell Apart_\n\nThe missiles used are specifically designed to cause most of the damage they do deep underground, not on the surface: If they used up all their destructiveness on the surface, they wouldn't be able to do the job they were intended to do.\n\nFTA: “Damage to Iran’s three known enrichment facilities, the destruction of Iran’s centrifuge manufacturing capabilities, its uranium conversion facility, uranium metal production plant, and other facilities involved in its nuclear weaponization process, reconstituting these capabilities will take significant time, investment, and energy to return to its previous state before the war or build nuclear weapons. Iran has likely lost close to 20,000 centrifuges at Natanz and Fordow, creating a major bottleneck in any reconstitution effort. Moreover, there has been considerable damage to Iran’s ability to build the nuclear weapon itself.”\n\nAnd there goes the DIA’s centrifuge claim.\n\nAlbright additionally made the points that negotiations with Iran weren’t going anywhere and that the strikes will further deter Iran.\n\nInsufferably outspoken leftist Cenk Uygur even attacked the DIA report, writing, “There’s a new bulls*** leak about how we didn’t destroy Iran’s facilities enough. That means Israel is not done with this war. 99% of the time those types of leaks are either fake intelligence from Israel or a neocon leaking speculative evidence to say we should go back into war.”\n\nhttps://www.westernjournal.com/cnn-reporter-trashes-operation-midnight-hammer-story-just-fell-apart/",
"mediaType": "text/plain"
}
},
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/698115654212919313/entities/urn:activity:1784647414302138368/activity"
},
{
"type": "Create",
"actor": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/698115654212919313",
"object": {
"type": "Note",
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/698115654212919313/entities/urn:activity:1784640053406863360",
"attributedTo": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/698115654212919313",
"content": "_FBI documents show agency sat on intel on potential China plan to meddle in 2020 election for Biden_<br /><br />\"Recently-unearthed internal FBI documents provide more evidence that the bureau purposely failed to properly investigate allegations of Chinese government meddling in the 2020 U.S. presidential election between Donald Trump and Joe Biden.\"<br /><br /><a href=\"https://justthenews.com/government/federal-agencies/fbi-documents-show-it-sat-intel-potential-chinese-plan-meddle-2020\" target=\"_blank\">https://justthenews.com/government/federal-agencies/fbi-documents-show-it-sat-intel-potential-chinese-plan-meddle-2020</a>",
"to": [
"https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public"
],
"cc": [
"https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/698115654212919313/followers"
],
"tag": [],
"url": "https://www.minds.com/newsfeed/1784640053406863360",
"published": "2025-06-25T16:02:25+00:00",
"source": {
"content": "_FBI documents show agency sat on intel on potential China plan to meddle in 2020 election for Biden_\n\n\"Recently-unearthed internal FBI documents provide more evidence that the bureau purposely failed to properly investigate allegations of Chinese government meddling in the 2020 U.S. presidential election between Donald Trump and Joe Biden.\"\n\nhttps://justthenews.com/government/federal-agencies/fbi-documents-show-it-sat-intel-potential-chinese-plan-meddle-2020",
"mediaType": "text/plain"
}
},
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/698115654212919313/entities/urn:activity:1784640053406863360/activity"
}
],
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/698115654212919313/outbox",
"partOf": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/698115654212919313/outboxoutbox"
}