A small tool to view real-world ActivityPub objects as JSON! Enter a URL
or username from Mastodon or a similar service below, and we'll send a
request with
the right
Accept
header
to the server to view the underlying object.
{
"@context": "https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams",
"type": "OrderedCollectionPage",
"orderedItems": [
{
"type": "Create",
"actor": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/640719703836209172",
"object": {
"type": "Note",
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/640719703836209172/entities/urn:activity:977969043509432320",
"attributedTo": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/640719703836209172",
"content": "<br /><br />Why antiWhite hate reached its present pitch: Trump's victory in 2016. They never counted on anything like it.<br /><br />Until then, coloreds and specials assumed that we'd gently go and continue being a good sport about it. It was very important to their peace of mind that we dont struggle.<br /><br />Trump's victory was a shock to them. An illusion that was vital to their peace of mind had burst: Whites do want to live, Whites do want separation from you, and underneath it all, Whites are repulsed by you.<br /><br />And we never really meant any of that stuff about equality with you.<br /><br /><a href=\"https://gab.com/PA_01/posts/Zm1UT0tFeWhHQnpVRnlDQzRVS1BzUT09\" target=\"_blank\">https://gab.com/PA_01/posts/Zm1UT0tFeWhHQnpVRnlDQzRVS1BzUT09</a>",
"to": [
"https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public"
],
"cc": [
"https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/640719703836209172/followers"
],
"tag": [],
"url": "https://www.minds.com/newsfeed/977969043509432320",
"published": "2019-05-22T16:19:49+00:00",
"source": {
"content": "\n\nWhy antiWhite hate reached its present pitch: Trump's victory in 2016. They never counted on anything like it.\n\nUntil then, coloreds and specials assumed that we'd gently go and continue being a good sport about it. It was very important to their peace of mind that we dont struggle.\n\nTrump's victory was a shock to them. An illusion that was vital to their peace of mind had burst: Whites do want to live, Whites do want separation from you, and underneath it all, Whites are repulsed by you.\n\nAnd we never really meant any of that stuff about equality with you.\n\nhttps://gab.com/PA_01/posts/Zm1UT0tFeWhHQnpVRnlDQzRVS1BzUT09",
"mediaType": "text/plain"
}
},
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/640719703836209172/entities/urn:activity:977969043509432320/activity"
},
{
"type": "Create",
"actor": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/640719703836209172",
"object": {
"type": "Note",
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/640719703836209172/entities/urn:activity:965579099055886336",
"attributedTo": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/640719703836209172",
"content": "Arthur Frayn <a class=\"u-url mention\" href=\"https://www.minds.com/ArthurFrayn\" target=\"_blank\">@ArthurFrayn</a><br /><br />\"Nobody gave a flying fuck about homosexuality one way or the other until the left politicized it and tried to use it as a moral and political bludgeon. You're a tiny and insignificant portion of the population, the world does not revolve around your stupid fucking sexual identity. You idiots have created an army of enemies where before there had been none, good job.<br /><br />Even just 5 years ago, I was totally indifferent. I didn't care one way or the other, like a lot of people. But now, after years of hysterics, pearl clutching, demonizing, and obnoxious political theatrics, I'm totally opposed to it. I'll literally sign off on outlawing it now. Fuck off. I'll cite the astronomical CDC stats on gays and sexually transmitted disease. You're basically walking petri dishes, so there is clearly a legitimate public interest in prohibiting it. It's basically a public health issue. And I'm just scratching the surface. You're deluded if you think the only criticism we can make of homosexuality is religious.People become a lot more amenable to this view when you start tying homosexuality to communism, open borders, the destruction of the family or a politics that ignores the financial and social impossibility of having children. They don't have to be religious at all to come around to this view. Surprise!<br /><br />Do you realize how pathetic you sound? The ridiculous navel gazing and whinging about your little degenerate bourgeois bullshit while half the country sinks into despair because they have no future? Goldman sachs showering pride parades with corporate money because they want you to keep voting for open border cheap labor mass immigration after 40 years of wage stagnation. It's fucking nauseating and moronic. But none of this ever occurred to you because you're the star of your own lifetime movie and we're just the extras or the villains.<br /><br />So you go right ahead and keep trying to shame us as \"bigots\" for not making your stupid sexual choices the center of our existence and cultural/political life, because all it does is get people to start considering legitimate reasons to prohibit homosexuality, and they do exist. Find that out the hard way.<br /><br />Nobody is putting you on trial, you idiot. You put us on trial because you let the neoliberal left turn you into political props, an ideological fad for the cool kid fashion statement left, and now we're telling you to fuck off. Let me know when you get run out of a job for being a homosexual, or hit with a bike lock by some lunatic while the mass media cheers and snickers, or put away for 10 years after defending yourself from assault while the police look on and do nothing because they were ordered to so that the media could paint you as a monster and justify deplatforming or waging lawfare against you. Tell me more about how you're a trial and cry because somebody called you a degenerate once.<br /><br />Oh and by the way, Matthew Shepard wasn't killed by cowboy frat jock nazi homophobes, he was killed by other gays. It was over drugs. And since you, like the majority of homosexuals, probably didn't know that, let me ask you who is really on trial here and has been the whole time.\"<br /><br /><a href=\"https://voat.co/v/whatever/2867892\" target=\"_blank\">https://voat.co/v/whatever/2867892</a>",
"to": [
"https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public"
],
"cc": [
"https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/640719703836209172/followers"
],
"tag": [],
"url": "https://www.minds.com/newsfeed/965579099055886336",
"published": "2019-04-18T11:46:36+00:00",
"source": {
"content": "Arthur Frayn @ArthurFrayn\n\n\"Nobody gave a flying fuck about homosexuality one way or the other until the left politicized it and tried to use it as a moral and political bludgeon. You're a tiny and insignificant portion of the population, the world does not revolve around your stupid fucking sexual identity. You idiots have created an army of enemies where before there had been none, good job.\n\nEven just 5 years ago, I was totally indifferent. I didn't care one way or the other, like a lot of people. But now, after years of hysterics, pearl clutching, demonizing, and obnoxious political theatrics, I'm totally opposed to it. I'll literally sign off on outlawing it now. Fuck off. I'll cite the astronomical CDC stats on gays and sexually transmitted disease. You're basically walking petri dishes, so there is clearly a legitimate public interest in prohibiting it. It's basically a public health issue. And I'm just scratching the surface. You're deluded if you think the only criticism we can make of homosexuality is religious.People become a lot more amenable to this view when you start tying homosexuality to communism, open borders, the destruction of the family or a politics that ignores the financial and social impossibility of having children. They don't have to be religious at all to come around to this view. Surprise!\n\nDo you realize how pathetic you sound? The ridiculous navel gazing and whinging about your little degenerate bourgeois bullshit while half the country sinks into despair because they have no future? Goldman sachs showering pride parades with corporate money because they want you to keep voting for open border cheap labor mass immigration after 40 years of wage stagnation. It's fucking nauseating and moronic. But none of this ever occurred to you because you're the star of your own lifetime movie and we're just the extras or the villains.\n\nSo you go right ahead and keep trying to shame us as \"bigots\" for not making your stupid sexual choices the center of our existence and cultural/political life, because all it does is get people to start considering legitimate reasons to prohibit homosexuality, and they do exist. Find that out the hard way.\n\nNobody is putting you on trial, you idiot. You put us on trial because you let the neoliberal left turn you into political props, an ideological fad for the cool kid fashion statement left, and now we're telling you to fuck off. Let me know when you get run out of a job for being a homosexual, or hit with a bike lock by some lunatic while the mass media cheers and snickers, or put away for 10 years after defending yourself from assault while the police look on and do nothing because they were ordered to so that the media could paint you as a monster and justify deplatforming or waging lawfare against you. Tell me more about how you're a trial and cry because somebody called you a degenerate once.\n\nOh and by the way, Matthew Shepard wasn't killed by cowboy frat jock nazi homophobes, he was killed by other gays. It was over drugs. And since you, like the majority of homosexuals, probably didn't know that, let me ask you who is really on trial here and has been the whole time.\"\n\nhttps://voat.co/v/whatever/2867892",
"mediaType": "text/plain"
}
},
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/640719703836209172/entities/urn:activity:965579099055886336/activity"
},
{
"type": "Create",
"actor": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/640719703836209172",
"object": {
"type": "Note",
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/640719703836209172/entities/urn:activity:965250232336629760",
"attributedTo": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/640719703836209172",
"content": "For the identity of France is under assault on a number of fronts. The left-leaning status quo has set up a false duality: one either worships multiculturalism and rejects a national identity as the sworn enemy of multiculturalism, or one is a rightist racist. Thus anyone who even refers to a national identity of France is quickly vilified and marginalized.<br /><br /><a href=\"https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2019-04-16/notre-dame-identity-france\" target=\"_blank\">https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2019-04-16/notre-dame-identity-france</a>",
"to": [
"https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public"
],
"cc": [
"https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/640719703836209172/followers"
],
"tag": [],
"url": "https://www.minds.com/newsfeed/965250232336629760",
"published": "2019-04-17T13:59:48+00:00",
"source": {
"content": "For the identity of France is under assault on a number of fronts. The left-leaning status quo has set up a false duality: one either worships multiculturalism and rejects a national identity as the sworn enemy of multiculturalism, or one is a rightist racist. Thus anyone who even refers to a national identity of France is quickly vilified and marginalized.\n\nhttps://www.zerohedge.com/news/2019-04-16/notre-dame-identity-france",
"mediaType": "text/plain"
}
},
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/640719703836209172/entities/urn:activity:965250232336629760/activity"
},
{
"type": "Create",
"actor": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/640719703836209172",
"object": {
"type": "Note",
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/640719703836209172/entities/urn:activity:962320797712420864",
"attributedTo": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/640719703836209172",
"content": "In today’s Western societies, anti-racism has come to be viewed as the morally correct position and racism as the ultimate evil. This creates substantial incentives for conformity in our racial views and rewards status-seeking behavior (sometimes referred to as “virtue signaling”) on racial issues. In those cases where this dominant moral paradigm conflicts with an individual’s other needs, such as the desire to live in a safe neighborhood, rationalizations provide the necessary cover so that white liberals can avoid guilt and cognitive dissonance while simultaneously engaging in hypocritical behavior.<br /><br />In sum, white liberals are simply acting on the same hard-wired psychological motivations that are present in all human beings. As social creatures, they are programmed to conform to the dominant moral paradigm in their social environment. Of course, this tendency also affects conservatives. This universal human tendency toward conformity is one reason why American politics are so strongly polarized, not just ideologically but also geographically.<br /><br />As challenging as these barriers may seem, however, it gets worse. Research has shown that human beings are highly resistant to facts that challenge their core convictions. They will seize on any information that confirms their preexisting beliefs and if their beliefs are challenged, they will simply ignore or disbelieve the source. Stronger challenges to core beliefs can even backfire, causing people to double down on their original position.<br /><br />Troy Campbell, a researcher on the topic, explained it this way: “As causes become our identity, we don’t just believe we are right anymore; we need to believe we are right to maintain self-worth.”<br /><br />The Missing Ingredient: Fear<br /><br />Liberalism’s close ties to its own version of morality – combined with the universal human needs for self-esteem and social belonging – make this an exceedingly tough nut to crack. But crack it will. How do we break through these barriers? The answer can be found near the bottom of Maslow’s hierarchy: the need for safety.<br /><br />The biological basis for safety-seeking behavior is well known. Incoming sensory information is first processed in an ancient portion of the brain called the amygdalawhere perceived threats can trigger a near instantaneous fight or flight response. The amygdala are also responsible for a variety of other emotional reactions that can play a central role in decision-making.<br /><br />These and other recent developments in neuroscience and evolutionary biology have substantially confirmed many of Maslow’s earlier findings. This includes the needs for self esteem, love, and belonging that lie at the heart of the liberal worldview. However, it also includes safety needs, which recent research suggests are even more dominant than Maslow first thought.<br /><br />The implications of this research are clear. Most white liberals will not be convinced by rational arguments, no matter how strong or well-supported those arguments may be. They will only be convinced by threats to their basic safety. This, in turn, points to the real barrier. Most white liberals do not feel threatened.<br /><br />Most of them do not see a civilization that is crumbling around them or a brewing threat on the horizon. They see a thriving economy and a skyrocketing stock market. Yes, race relations are not perfect, but they think those problems will sort themselves out as soon as we solve the challenge of poverty and get rid of Donald Trump. Immigration is beneficial. There are no meaningful differences between people. Trump voters are just suffering from irrational phobias and “white anxiety.” Times are good. What on earth is there to be afraid of?<br /><br />For the average white liberal, strident anti-immigration positions are not just racist, but pointlessly so. According to one poll, 73 percent of Hillary Clinton’s white voters reportedly thought it was racist for white Americans to even have an opinion on immigration.<br /><br />The sad reality is that few people who are living in a bubble are able to see it until it pops. The rare iconoclasts who are right too soon are usually viewed as social outcasts and misfits. The liberal bubble is about to pop, however. The signs are all around us.<br />The Growing Threat<br /><br />The coming awakening of white liberals, which in the United States will probably occur over the next decade, will be primarily due to five factors. The first, instinctual ethnocentrism, affects humans and animalsalike and is present in babies. Although such ethnocentrism is not new, it remains centrally important and provides a baseline for the other factors.<br /><br />The second is growing direct contact with minorities, which will only increase as the nation continues to change over time. Some academics argue that such contact can improve race relations, but other research has shown that the negative effects are stronger. Ongoing white flight in neighborhoods and schools provides the most definitive answer on this question.<br /><br />A third factor is growing cultural threat. Unlike direct contact, which is lessened by white flight, there is no escaping mass culture. As was noted in a recent Vox article, White Threat in a Browning America:<br /><br />We live in an America where television programs, commercials, and movies are trying to represent a browner country; where Black Panther is a celebrated cultural event and <a href=\"https://www.minds.com/search?f=top&t=all&q=OscarsSoWhite\" title=\"#OscarsSoWhite\" class=\"u-url hashtag\" target=\"_blank\">#OscarsSoWhite</a> is a nationally known hashtag; where NFL players kneel during the national anthem to protest police brutality and pressing 1 for English is commonplace.<br /><br />This unavoidable onslaught is a constant reminder to America’s white population that their nation is changing. Research has shown that such messages make them more conservative, view minorities less positively, and feel more attachment to other whites.<br /><br />A fourth factor is the growth of explicitly anti-white rhetoric. The idea that “whiteness” is inherently evil and should be abolished originated in academia, but now it is seeping into our broader culture and political discourse. Treating people equally and with decency regardless of their race was once sufficient to avoid the racist label, but now it elicits charges of color-blind racism and implicit bias. Unsurprisingly, research has found that accusations of white privilege can make people feel defensive and resentful. Even white allies are not immune. Black Lives Matter demonstrators protested Bernie Sanders’ candidacy. White feminists were blamed for Trump’s election and criticized for their “white supremacy in heels.”<br /><br />The fifth factor, political threat, may be the most important because, unlike the others, it cannot be avoided or ignored. The principal source of this threat is the nation’s changing demographics, which are empowering minorities and shiftingthe Democratic Party sharply to the left. The effects of this change have been evident in elections throughout the nation this year. These have included the well-publicized primary victory of Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez in New York, Andrew Gillum in Florida’s Democratic gubernatorial primary, and Stacey Abrams in the Georgia Democratic gubernatorial primary, as well as victories for lesser known candidates in governors’ races in Texas, Arizona, New Mexico, and Maryland.<br /><br />While many of these candidates will probably lose in November, they are paving the way for likely victories down the road as more states become majority-minority in the lead up to 2045, when the nation as a whole will reach that milestone. These changes, most of which are concentrated in the Democratic Party, can also be expected to shift future Democratic presidential nominees further left.<br /><br />The reaction of white voters to such hard-left ideological swings is well-established. Two of the most left-leaning presidential nominees in modern history, George McGovern and Walter Mondale, were trounced at the polls. More recently, moderate Republican gubernatorial candidates have a solid track record of defeating far-left Democrats in deep blue states. What accounts for this? Many white liberals, particularly those with high household incomes, are not as far left as they think.<br /><br />White liberals may not feel threatened by the left today, particularly with Republicans controlling Congress and Trump dominating the news on a daily basis, but that will change in the coming decade. As the nation changes, the mainstream media and social media companies may try to clamp down on opposing views, but they are unlikely to repress the emerging voices of the far left, who will do far more to open the eyes of white liberals than conservatives ever could. They are our unwitting allies.<br /><br />“Useful idiot” was once a term applied by communists to their supporters in the West, but the concept is still applicable today. Every day that someone kneels during the national anthem, calls for abolishing whiteness, or attacks another cherished Western tradition for its roots in “white supremacy” or “institutional racism” is another day that more white people will wake up to the growing threat.<br /><br /><a href=\"https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2019-04-08/how-when-will-white-liberals-wake\" target=\"_blank\">https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2019-04-08/how-when-will-white-liberals-wake</a>",
"to": [
"https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public"
],
"cc": [
"https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/640719703836209172/followers"
],
"tag": [],
"url": "https://www.minds.com/newsfeed/962320797712420864",
"published": "2019-04-09T11:59:17+00:00",
"source": {
"content": "In today’s Western societies, anti-racism has come to be viewed as the morally correct position and racism as the ultimate evil. This creates substantial incentives for conformity in our racial views and rewards status-seeking behavior (sometimes referred to as “virtue signaling”) on racial issues. In those cases where this dominant moral paradigm conflicts with an individual’s other needs, such as the desire to live in a safe neighborhood, rationalizations provide the necessary cover so that white liberals can avoid guilt and cognitive dissonance while simultaneously engaging in hypocritical behavior.\n\nIn sum, white liberals are simply acting on the same hard-wired psychological motivations that are present in all human beings. As social creatures, they are programmed to conform to the dominant moral paradigm in their social environment. Of course, this tendency also affects conservatives. This universal human tendency toward conformity is one reason why American politics are so strongly polarized, not just ideologically but also geographically.\n\nAs challenging as these barriers may seem, however, it gets worse. Research has shown that human beings are highly resistant to facts that challenge their core convictions. They will seize on any information that confirms their preexisting beliefs and if their beliefs are challenged, they will simply ignore or disbelieve the source. Stronger challenges to core beliefs can even backfire, causing people to double down on their original position.\n\nTroy Campbell, a researcher on the topic, explained it this way: “As causes become our identity, we don’t just believe we are right anymore; we need to believe we are right to maintain self-worth.”\n\nThe Missing Ingredient: Fear\n\nLiberalism’s close ties to its own version of morality – combined with the universal human needs for self-esteem and social belonging – make this an exceedingly tough nut to crack. But crack it will. How do we break through these barriers? The answer can be found near the bottom of Maslow’s hierarchy: the need for safety.\n\nThe biological basis for safety-seeking behavior is well known. Incoming sensory information is first processed in an ancient portion of the brain called the amygdalawhere perceived threats can trigger a near instantaneous fight or flight response. The amygdala are also responsible for a variety of other emotional reactions that can play a central role in decision-making.\n\nThese and other recent developments in neuroscience and evolutionary biology have substantially confirmed many of Maslow’s earlier findings. This includes the needs for self esteem, love, and belonging that lie at the heart of the liberal worldview. However, it also includes safety needs, which recent research suggests are even more dominant than Maslow first thought.\n\nThe implications of this research are clear. Most white liberals will not be convinced by rational arguments, no matter how strong or well-supported those arguments may be. They will only be convinced by threats to their basic safety. This, in turn, points to the real barrier. Most white liberals do not feel threatened.\n\nMost of them do not see a civilization that is crumbling around them or a brewing threat on the horizon. They see a thriving economy and a skyrocketing stock market. Yes, race relations are not perfect, but they think those problems will sort themselves out as soon as we solve the challenge of poverty and get rid of Donald Trump. Immigration is beneficial. There are no meaningful differences between people. Trump voters are just suffering from irrational phobias and “white anxiety.” Times are good. What on earth is there to be afraid of?\n\nFor the average white liberal, strident anti-immigration positions are not just racist, but pointlessly so. According to one poll, 73 percent of Hillary Clinton’s white voters reportedly thought it was racist for white Americans to even have an opinion on immigration.\n\nThe sad reality is that few people who are living in a bubble are able to see it until it pops. The rare iconoclasts who are right too soon are usually viewed as social outcasts and misfits. The liberal bubble is about to pop, however. The signs are all around us.\nThe Growing Threat\n\nThe coming awakening of white liberals, which in the United States will probably occur over the next decade, will be primarily due to five factors. The first, instinctual ethnocentrism, affects humans and animalsalike and is present in babies. Although such ethnocentrism is not new, it remains centrally important and provides a baseline for the other factors.\n\nThe second is growing direct contact with minorities, which will only increase as the nation continues to change over time. Some academics argue that such contact can improve race relations, but other research has shown that the negative effects are stronger. Ongoing white flight in neighborhoods and schools provides the most definitive answer on this question.\n\nA third factor is growing cultural threat. Unlike direct contact, which is lessened by white flight, there is no escaping mass culture. As was noted in a recent Vox article, White Threat in a Browning America:\n\nWe live in an America where television programs, commercials, and movies are trying to represent a browner country; where Black Panther is a celebrated cultural event and #OscarsSoWhite is a nationally known hashtag; where NFL players kneel during the national anthem to protest police brutality and pressing 1 for English is commonplace.\n\nThis unavoidable onslaught is a constant reminder to America’s white population that their nation is changing. Research has shown that such messages make them more conservative, view minorities less positively, and feel more attachment to other whites.\n\nA fourth factor is the growth of explicitly anti-white rhetoric. The idea that “whiteness” is inherently evil and should be abolished originated in academia, but now it is seeping into our broader culture and political discourse. Treating people equally and with decency regardless of their race was once sufficient to avoid the racist label, but now it elicits charges of color-blind racism and implicit bias. Unsurprisingly, research has found that accusations of white privilege can make people feel defensive and resentful. Even white allies are not immune. Black Lives Matter demonstrators protested Bernie Sanders’ candidacy. White feminists were blamed for Trump’s election and criticized for their “white supremacy in heels.”\n\nThe fifth factor, political threat, may be the most important because, unlike the others, it cannot be avoided or ignored. The principal source of this threat is the nation’s changing demographics, which are empowering minorities and shiftingthe Democratic Party sharply to the left. The effects of this change have been evident in elections throughout the nation this year. These have included the well-publicized primary victory of Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez in New York, Andrew Gillum in Florida’s Democratic gubernatorial primary, and Stacey Abrams in the Georgia Democratic gubernatorial primary, as well as victories for lesser known candidates in governors’ races in Texas, Arizona, New Mexico, and Maryland.\n\nWhile many of these candidates will probably lose in November, they are paving the way for likely victories down the road as more states become majority-minority in the lead up to 2045, when the nation as a whole will reach that milestone. These changes, most of which are concentrated in the Democratic Party, can also be expected to shift future Democratic presidential nominees further left.\n\nThe reaction of white voters to such hard-left ideological swings is well-established. Two of the most left-leaning presidential nominees in modern history, George McGovern and Walter Mondale, were trounced at the polls. More recently, moderate Republican gubernatorial candidates have a solid track record of defeating far-left Democrats in deep blue states. What accounts for this? Many white liberals, particularly those with high household incomes, are not as far left as they think.\n\nWhite liberals may not feel threatened by the left today, particularly with Republicans controlling Congress and Trump dominating the news on a daily basis, but that will change in the coming decade. As the nation changes, the mainstream media and social media companies may try to clamp down on opposing views, but they are unlikely to repress the emerging voices of the far left, who will do far more to open the eyes of white liberals than conservatives ever could. They are our unwitting allies.\n\n“Useful idiot” was once a term applied by communists to their supporters in the West, but the concept is still applicable today. Every day that someone kneels during the national anthem, calls for abolishing whiteness, or attacks another cherished Western tradition for its roots in “white supremacy” or “institutional racism” is another day that more white people will wake up to the growing threat.\n\nhttps://www.zerohedge.com/news/2019-04-08/how-when-will-white-liberals-wake",
"mediaType": "text/plain"
}
},
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/640719703836209172/entities/urn:activity:962320797712420864/activity"
},
{
"type": "Create",
"actor": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/640719703836209172",
"object": {
"type": "Note",
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/640719703836209172/entities/urn:activity:960867413263912960",
"attributedTo": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/640719703836209172",
"content": "According to a lengthy investigation by Bloomberg on Google's struggle to maximize profit while addressing calls to censor 'toxic' material, a rogue employee decided to ignore the advice of corporate attorneys and created a new \"vertical\" category to internally track so-called \"alt-right\" content - described as \"the political ensemble loosely tied to Trump.\" <br /><br />What they found was fascinating; alt-right videos are an absolute monster category for the video-hosting platform, right up with \"music, sports and gaming\" as the most popular. <br /><br /><a href=\"https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2019-04-02/rogue-youtube-employee-discovers-something-amazing-about-alt-right-content\" target=\"_blank\">https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2019-04-02/rogue-youtube-employee-discovers-something-amazing-about-alt-right-content</a>",
"to": [
"https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public"
],
"cc": [
"https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/640719703836209172/followers"
],
"tag": [],
"url": "https://www.minds.com/newsfeed/960867413263912960",
"published": "2019-04-05T11:44:03+00:00",
"source": {
"content": "According to a lengthy investigation by Bloomberg on Google's struggle to maximize profit while addressing calls to censor 'toxic' material, a rogue employee decided to ignore the advice of corporate attorneys and created a new \"vertical\" category to internally track so-called \"alt-right\" content - described as \"the political ensemble loosely tied to Trump.\" \n\nWhat they found was fascinating; alt-right videos are an absolute monster category for the video-hosting platform, right up with \"music, sports and gaming\" as the most popular. \n\nhttps://www.zerohedge.com/news/2019-04-02/rogue-youtube-employee-discovers-something-amazing-about-alt-right-content",
"mediaType": "text/plain"
}
},
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/640719703836209172/entities/urn:activity:960867413263912960/activity"
},
{
"type": "Create",
"actor": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/640719703836209172",
"object": {
"type": "Note",
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/640719703836209172/entities/urn:activity:957691111253082112",
"attributedTo": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/640719703836209172",
"content": "In most of the West, you can’t tell your sons they have a right to their land, or that they have many reasons to be proud of their race. But you can tell them it’s OK to cut their dicks off, pump themselves full of female hormones, and fight for access to the girl’s bathroom.<br />...<br />Every “Whiteness” seminar, every day of mass migration, every speech law, every allegation of racism, every Zionist cent that sways our politics, every claim our lands were always diverse, every neighborhood that becomes a “no-go” zone is an act of terrorism.<br /><br /><a href=\"https://heartiste.wordpress.com/2019/03/25/a-selection-of-choice-twats-and-memes-to-celebrate-shitlib-implosion-day/\" target=\"_blank\">https://heartiste.wordpress.com/2019/03/25/a-selection-of-choice-twats-and-memes-to-celebrate-shitlib-implosion-day/</a>",
"to": [
"https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public"
],
"cc": [
"https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/640719703836209172/followers"
],
"tag": [],
"url": "https://www.minds.com/newsfeed/957691111253082112",
"published": "2019-03-27T17:22:33+00:00",
"source": {
"content": "In most of the West, you can’t tell your sons they have a right to their land, or that they have many reasons to be proud of their race. But you can tell them it’s OK to cut their dicks off, pump themselves full of female hormones, and fight for access to the girl’s bathroom.\n...\nEvery “Whiteness” seminar, every day of mass migration, every speech law, every allegation of racism, every Zionist cent that sways our politics, every claim our lands were always diverse, every neighborhood that becomes a “no-go” zone is an act of terrorism.\n\nhttps://heartiste.wordpress.com/2019/03/25/a-selection-of-choice-twats-and-memes-to-celebrate-shitlib-implosion-day/",
"mediaType": "text/plain"
}
},
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/640719703836209172/entities/urn:activity:957691111253082112/activity"
},
{
"type": "Create",
"actor": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/640719703836209172",
"object": {
"type": "Note",
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/640719703836209172/entities/urn:activity:949663115242725376",
"attributedTo": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/640719703836209172",
"content": "The “tipping point” at which vocal activists are able to change majority opinion to their minority view appears to be 25% of the group. Damon Centola and his team at the University of Pennsylvania have experimentally demonstrated this. [Experimental evidence for tipping points in social convention, By Damon Centola et al., Science, June 2018]<br /><br />They divided 194 volunteers into 10 groups and had them work together playing an online game in which they had to try to create new social norms. In each round of the game, the volunteers were put into random pairs and were shown a photo of a stranger’s face. They would discuss appropriate names for the face. Then, without consulting each other, they each had to choose the name they felt was most appropriate. At the end of the round, the names were revealed, and they won 10 cents if they’d both chosen the same name and lost 10 cents if they hadn’t.<br /><br />This mimics the way in which conformity can have a payoff. As the rounds progressed, and even though people only interacted with one of person in their group in each round, the volunteers developed “group-wide conventions” so that everyone ascribed the same name to the same face.<br /><br />At this point, Centola’s team had vociferous “activists” join the groups, varying how many activists joined each group. They found that if the activists made up less than 25% of the group then their ideas would not take off. But if they composed 25% of the group or more than their ideas always completely replaced the status quo. There was nothing in between these two extremes.<br /><br />Centola’s team then set up a computer model and found that it precisely replicated real life, with a “tipping point” of 25%. Even when there were very strong incentives to stick with the status quo, the tipping point was raised to a maximum of just 30%.<br /><br />It seems that once this proportion is reached, confidence in the current dispensation is increasingly undermined and those who disagree with it, but keep their heads down, become increasingly confident about defecting. This explains why the “change” can occur so quickly; why an idea can go from being “extreme” to “mainstream” so fast, as long as those who advocate the new idea do so in a kind of “rabble rousing” and confident way.<br /><br /><a href=\"https://vdare.com/articles/tipping-point-how-crazies-get-control-and-how-they-can-lose-it\" target=\"_blank\">https://vdare.com/articles/tipping-point-how-crazies-get-control-and-how-they-can-lose-it</a>",
"to": [
"https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public"
],
"cc": [
"https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/640719703836209172/followers"
],
"tag": [],
"url": "https://www.minds.com/newsfeed/949663115242725376",
"published": "2019-03-05T13:42:10+00:00",
"source": {
"content": "The “tipping point” at which vocal activists are able to change majority opinion to their minority view appears to be 25% of the group. Damon Centola and his team at the University of Pennsylvania have experimentally demonstrated this. [Experimental evidence for tipping points in social convention, By Damon Centola et al., Science, June 2018]\n\nThey divided 194 volunteers into 10 groups and had them work together playing an online game in which they had to try to create new social norms. In each round of the game, the volunteers were put into random pairs and were shown a photo of a stranger’s face. They would discuss appropriate names for the face. Then, without consulting each other, they each had to choose the name they felt was most appropriate. At the end of the round, the names were revealed, and they won 10 cents if they’d both chosen the same name and lost 10 cents if they hadn’t.\n\nThis mimics the way in which conformity can have a payoff. As the rounds progressed, and even though people only interacted with one of person in their group in each round, the volunteers developed “group-wide conventions” so that everyone ascribed the same name to the same face.\n\nAt this point, Centola’s team had vociferous “activists” join the groups, varying how many activists joined each group. They found that if the activists made up less than 25% of the group then their ideas would not take off. But if they composed 25% of the group or more than their ideas always completely replaced the status quo. There was nothing in between these two extremes.\n\nCentola’s team then set up a computer model and found that it precisely replicated real life, with a “tipping point” of 25%. Even when there were very strong incentives to stick with the status quo, the tipping point was raised to a maximum of just 30%.\n\nIt seems that once this proportion is reached, confidence in the current dispensation is increasingly undermined and those who disagree with it, but keep their heads down, become increasingly confident about defecting. This explains why the “change” can occur so quickly; why an idea can go from being “extreme” to “mainstream” so fast, as long as those who advocate the new idea do so in a kind of “rabble rousing” and confident way.\n\nhttps://vdare.com/articles/tipping-point-how-crazies-get-control-and-how-they-can-lose-it",
"mediaType": "text/plain"
}
},
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/640719703836209172/entities/urn:activity:949663115242725376/activity"
},
{
"type": "Create",
"actor": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/640719703836209172",
"object": {
"type": "Note",
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/640719703836209172/entities/urn:activity:945693414562217984",
"attributedTo": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/640719703836209172",
"content": "We have to stop talking of ‘White Privilege’. The term is too broad and genetic. Too often, the debate is about ‘there is white privilege’ vs ‘there is no white privilege’.<br />The problem is ‘white’ is too expansive and inclusive a category, including everyone from Bill Gates to toothless hillbilly in W. Virginia. So, ‘white privilege’ is pointless as it includes even dirt poor whites with nothing and are often victimized by black thugs.<br /><br />But there really is White Elite Privilege. Paradoxically, in order for White Elites to keep their own considerable status and privilege, they must denounce ‘White Privilege’. It’s so very convenient for them because they, as the clever educated and affluent, get to pretend as agents of ‘social justice’ against the white working class and ‘deplorables’ who resist ‘change’. (Diversity also favors the elites over the masses. In a homogeneous society, the elites with MORE are at moral disadvantage to the masses who have less. But in a diverse society, the haves can hug Diversity [mostly as tokens and peons] and accuse the have-nots of their own kind of ‘racism’ and ‘xenophobia’. Thus, moral advantage goes to the elites.)<br /><br />To expose and bring these a**holes down, we need to use the term, White Elite Privilege. Or White Comprador Elite Privilege because white elite privilege is in service to Jewish Super-Privilege. As Jewish Power has rigged the Narrative to make Jews holy & pure while making whites sinful & guilty, white elites must appear to atone for their past sins in order to justify and keep their privilege. Jews exploit this psychology by steering guilt-ridden white elites to serve Jewish power and Zionism, and the white elites play along because it isn’t too difficult to shout out ‘Long Live Israel’ and wave the Israeli flag. Sure beats being dragged to labor camps for re-education.<br /><br />We need to talk of White Elite Privilege vs White Mass Problems. Change the terms of the debate, and people will think differently.<br /><br /><a href=\"https://heartiste.wordpress.com/2019/02/21/reframe-of-the-week-white-elite-privilege/\" target=\"_blank\">https://heartiste.wordpress.com/2019/02/21/reframe-of-the-week-white-elite-privilege/</a>",
"to": [
"https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public"
],
"cc": [
"https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/640719703836209172/followers"
],
"tag": [],
"url": "https://www.minds.com/newsfeed/945693414562217984",
"published": "2019-02-22T14:48:00+00:00",
"source": {
"content": "We have to stop talking of ‘White Privilege’. The term is too broad and genetic. Too often, the debate is about ‘there is white privilege’ vs ‘there is no white privilege’.\nThe problem is ‘white’ is too expansive and inclusive a category, including everyone from Bill Gates to toothless hillbilly in W. Virginia. So, ‘white privilege’ is pointless as it includes even dirt poor whites with nothing and are often victimized by black thugs.\n\nBut there really is White Elite Privilege. Paradoxically, in order for White Elites to keep their own considerable status and privilege, they must denounce ‘White Privilege’. It’s so very convenient for them because they, as the clever educated and affluent, get to pretend as agents of ‘social justice’ against the white working class and ‘deplorables’ who resist ‘change’. (Diversity also favors the elites over the masses. In a homogeneous society, the elites with MORE are at moral disadvantage to the masses who have less. But in a diverse society, the haves can hug Diversity [mostly as tokens and peons] and accuse the have-nots of their own kind of ‘racism’ and ‘xenophobia’. Thus, moral advantage goes to the elites.)\n\nTo expose and bring these a**holes down, we need to use the term, White Elite Privilege. Or White Comprador Elite Privilege because white elite privilege is in service to Jewish Super-Privilege. As Jewish Power has rigged the Narrative to make Jews holy & pure while making whites sinful & guilty, white elites must appear to atone for their past sins in order to justify and keep their privilege. Jews exploit this psychology by steering guilt-ridden white elites to serve Jewish power and Zionism, and the white elites play along because it isn’t too difficult to shout out ‘Long Live Israel’ and wave the Israeli flag. Sure beats being dragged to labor camps for re-education.\n\nWe need to talk of White Elite Privilege vs White Mass Problems. Change the terms of the debate, and people will think differently.\n\nhttps://heartiste.wordpress.com/2019/02/21/reframe-of-the-week-white-elite-privilege/",
"mediaType": "text/plain"
}
},
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/640719703836209172/entities/urn:activity:945693414562217984/activity"
},
{
"type": "Create",
"actor": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/640719703836209172",
"object": {
"type": "Note",
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/640719703836209172/entities/urn:activity:942066447980580864",
"attributedTo": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/640719703836209172",
"content": "46% of the Gilets Jaunes agree with the proposition that:<br /><br />“immigration is organised deliberately by our political, intellectual and media elites to bring about the replacement of the European population with an immigrant population”<br />...<br />44% of people who call themselves Gilets Jaunes believe there is a Zionist conspiracy at a global level, compared to “only” 22% in the general population.<br /><br /><a href=\"https://diversitymachtfrei.wordpress.com/2019/02/11/44-of-gilets-jaunes-think-there-is-a-zionist-conspiracy-on-a-global-scale/\" target=\"_blank\">https://diversitymachtfrei.wordpress.com/2019/02/11/44-of-gilets-jaunes-think-there-is-a-zionist-conspiracy-on-a-global-scale/</a><br />",
"to": [
"https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public"
],
"cc": [
"https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/640719703836209172/followers"
],
"tag": [],
"url": "https://www.minds.com/newsfeed/942066447980580864",
"published": "2019-02-12T14:35:43+00:00",
"source": {
"content": "46% of the Gilets Jaunes agree with the proposition that:\n\n“immigration is organised deliberately by our political, intellectual and media elites to bring about the replacement of the European population with an immigrant population”\n...\n44% of people who call themselves Gilets Jaunes believe there is a Zionist conspiracy at a global level, compared to “only” 22% in the general population.\n\nhttps://diversitymachtfrei.wordpress.com/2019/02/11/44-of-gilets-jaunes-think-there-is-a-zionist-conspiracy-on-a-global-scale/\n",
"mediaType": "text/plain"
}
},
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/640719703836209172/entities/urn:activity:942066447980580864/activity"
},
{
"type": "Create",
"actor": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/640719703836209172",
"object": {
"type": "Note",
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/640719703836209172/entities/urn:activity:936593040946921472",
"attributedTo": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/640719703836209172",
"content": "“Gamma” is a rank on Vox Day’s theory of male sociosexual hierarchy, which he developed in 2011. There was previously no word for the personality type, even though Gamma males have always been around: the socially and sexually repellent without necessarily being low on the totem pole or physically unattractive, the resentful and depressive, often shrewd or intelligent but also self-sabotaging. There were always words that got at the aspects of the Gamma male, but not at the clinical phenomenon itself:<br /><br />Immature, delusional, prideful, callow, dishonest, narcissistic, unreliable, weak, passive-aggressive, backstabbing, effeminate, unpopular, ass-kisser, coward, creep, nerd, pussy.<br />...<br />There is also a significance to defining the Gamma personality that goes beyond practical psychology: it counters the subversion created by an influential Frankfurt School book that came out in 1950, “The Authoritarian Personality” by Theodor Adorno et al.<br /><br /> The Authoritarian Personality “invented a set of criteria by which to define personality traits, ranked these traits and their intensity in any given person on what it called the ‘F scale’ (F for fascist).” The personality type Adorno et al. identified can be defined by nine traits that were believed to cluster together as the result of childhood experiences. These traits include conventionalism, authoritarian submission, authoritarian aggression, anti-intellectualism, anti-intraception, superstition and stereotypy, power and “toughness”, destructiveness and cynicism, projectivity, and exaggerated concerns over sex. [Infogalactic]<br /><br />Shaming the Free World as “fascist” was a blow to the gut. The message encountered no resistance on the western side of the Iron Curtain, exposing countries to the most virulent, slow-release strains of Marxism. We see its apotheosis today, with the rape of Germany.<br /><br />The propaganda that purported to be social science pathologized natural and honorable male behavior that thrives in an uninfected society:<br /><br /> The Delta is pathological in following his duty as immediate protector and provider.<br /> The Beta is pathological in his loyalty to the captains of the community.<br /> The Alpha is pathological in assuming his responsibility as a leader.<br /><br />Vox’s sociosexual hierarchy, with “Gamma” as its most original component, reverses the arrow of pathology, pointing it, correctly, to personalities that are in fact unhealthy. Hating the “authoritarian personality” is the Gamma’s cover for his Alpha ambition without the Alpha goods. It is the unwanted boarder’s lust for the goods of his host.<br /><br /><a href=\"https://paworldandtimes.wordpress.com/2019/01/27/the-discovery-of-the-gamma-personality/\" target=\"_blank\">https://paworldandtimes.wordpress.com/2019/01/27/the-discovery-of-the-gamma-personality/</a>",
"to": [
"https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public"
],
"cc": [
"https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/640719703836209172/followers"
],
"tag": [],
"url": "https://www.minds.com/newsfeed/936593040946921472",
"published": "2019-01-28T12:06:22+00:00",
"source": {
"content": "“Gamma” is a rank on Vox Day’s theory of male sociosexual hierarchy, which he developed in 2011. There was previously no word for the personality type, even though Gamma males have always been around: the socially and sexually repellent without necessarily being low on the totem pole or physically unattractive, the resentful and depressive, often shrewd or intelligent but also self-sabotaging. There were always words that got at the aspects of the Gamma male, but not at the clinical phenomenon itself:\n\nImmature, delusional, prideful, callow, dishonest, narcissistic, unreliable, weak, passive-aggressive, backstabbing, effeminate, unpopular, ass-kisser, coward, creep, nerd, pussy.\n...\nThere is also a significance to defining the Gamma personality that goes beyond practical psychology: it counters the subversion created by an influential Frankfurt School book that came out in 1950, “The Authoritarian Personality” by Theodor Adorno et al.\n\n The Authoritarian Personality “invented a set of criteria by which to define personality traits, ranked these traits and their intensity in any given person on what it called the ‘F scale’ (F for fascist).” The personality type Adorno et al. identified can be defined by nine traits that were believed to cluster together as the result of childhood experiences. These traits include conventionalism, authoritarian submission, authoritarian aggression, anti-intellectualism, anti-intraception, superstition and stereotypy, power and “toughness”, destructiveness and cynicism, projectivity, and exaggerated concerns over sex. [Infogalactic]\n\nShaming the Free World as “fascist” was a blow to the gut. The message encountered no resistance on the western side of the Iron Curtain, exposing countries to the most virulent, slow-release strains of Marxism. We see its apotheosis today, with the rape of Germany.\n\nThe propaganda that purported to be social science pathologized natural and honorable male behavior that thrives in an uninfected society:\n\n The Delta is pathological in following his duty as immediate protector and provider.\n The Beta is pathological in his loyalty to the captains of the community.\n The Alpha is pathological in assuming his responsibility as a leader.\n\nVox’s sociosexual hierarchy, with “Gamma” as its most original component, reverses the arrow of pathology, pointing it, correctly, to personalities that are in fact unhealthy. Hating the “authoritarian personality” is the Gamma’s cover for his Alpha ambition without the Alpha goods. It is the unwanted boarder’s lust for the goods of his host.\n\nhttps://paworldandtimes.wordpress.com/2019/01/27/the-discovery-of-the-gamma-personality/",
"mediaType": "text/plain"
}
},
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/640719703836209172/entities/urn:activity:936593040946921472/activity"
},
{
"type": "Create",
"actor": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/640719703836209172",
"object": {
"type": "Note",
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/640719703836209172/entities/urn:activity:936564356834222080",
"attributedTo": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/640719703836209172",
"content": "We have never had equality before the law, and are having it less every day. Cops have a special right to use violence, blacks have a special right to use violence and to not be insulted, similar to that of the traditional aristocracy, Hispanics and illegal immigrants in California have a special right to use violence and to not be insulted.<br /><br />State building is coalition building to rule. We need a coalition of the smart, the cooperative, and the productive, ruling the stupid, the disruptive, and the destructive. The doctrine of equality means you cannot reward the elite with status? What! Of course the ruling elite is going to be rewarded with status, and that is exactly what is happening.<br /><br />The ruling elite always gets rewarded, the ruling coalition always gets rewarded. Members of the ruling coalition always get a superior right to use violence, and a superior right to not be insulted. That is the way it is, and that is what we saw when white people were ethnically cleansed out of Detroit. The doctrine of equality before the law was always a lie intended to destroy the coalition of the smart, the cooperative, and the productive, to guilt the best people into surrender, so that they could be destroyed by a coalition of the worst.<br /><br />Freehold means that we acknowledge that some state power is in fact private property, and the sovereign lets his loyal vassals enjoy their privilege, because if he tries to meddle, he will be overwhelmed by detail and complexity, so best to formalize that privilege and make it official. If we don’t have the aristocracy that so offended the founding fathers, we find ourselves with blacks exercising aristocratic privilege over whites. Equality before the law is an unworkable ideal, hypocritically betrayed in actual practice. Some people are going to be unjustly privileged. Let us try to make it the best people rather than the worst people, and try to make it the people that the state draws is wealth and coercive power from, rather than the people who sponge off the state.<br /><br /><a href=\"https://blog.jim.com/war/deus-vult-2/\" target=\"_blank\">https://blog.jim.com/war/deus-vult-2/</a>",
"to": [
"https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public"
],
"cc": [
"https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/640719703836209172/followers"
],
"tag": [],
"url": "https://www.minds.com/newsfeed/936564356834222080",
"published": "2019-01-28T10:12:23+00:00",
"source": {
"content": "We have never had equality before the law, and are having it less every day. Cops have a special right to use violence, blacks have a special right to use violence and to not be insulted, similar to that of the traditional aristocracy, Hispanics and illegal immigrants in California have a special right to use violence and to not be insulted.\n\nState building is coalition building to rule. We need a coalition of the smart, the cooperative, and the productive, ruling the stupid, the disruptive, and the destructive. The doctrine of equality means you cannot reward the elite with status? What! Of course the ruling elite is going to be rewarded with status, and that is exactly what is happening.\n\nThe ruling elite always gets rewarded, the ruling coalition always gets rewarded. Members of the ruling coalition always get a superior right to use violence, and a superior right to not be insulted. That is the way it is, and that is what we saw when white people were ethnically cleansed out of Detroit. The doctrine of equality before the law was always a lie intended to destroy the coalition of the smart, the cooperative, and the productive, to guilt the best people into surrender, so that they could be destroyed by a coalition of the worst.\n\nFreehold means that we acknowledge that some state power is in fact private property, and the sovereign lets his loyal vassals enjoy their privilege, because if he tries to meddle, he will be overwhelmed by detail and complexity, so best to formalize that privilege and make it official. If we don’t have the aristocracy that so offended the founding fathers, we find ourselves with blacks exercising aristocratic privilege over whites. Equality before the law is an unworkable ideal, hypocritically betrayed in actual practice. Some people are going to be unjustly privileged. Let us try to make it the best people rather than the worst people, and try to make it the people that the state draws is wealth and coercive power from, rather than the people who sponge off the state.\n\nhttps://blog.jim.com/war/deus-vult-2/",
"mediaType": "text/plain"
}
},
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/640719703836209172/entities/urn:activity:936564356834222080/activity"
},
{
"type": "Create",
"actor": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/640719703836209172",
"object": {
"type": "Note",
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/640719703836209172/entities/urn:activity:934826881032716288",
"attributedTo": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/640719703836209172",
"content": "As we all know, the political left, born out of the chaos of the French Revolution, came of age when Karl Marx produced a working formula: class struggle. You go find the low status people in your country, tell them the world is divided in two sorts of people: them, and the guys on top of them. The guys on top are oppressors, the guys on the bottom are oppressed: if you, the oppressed follow me, we’ll turn the table, “liberate you” i.e. grab their stuff and their status and give it to you.<br /><br />Then after WW2 the Western left realized that the oppressor/oppressed template worked much better with groups disadvantaged biologically than with mere social class. Hence we got Bioleninism. The industrial worker who was so much into socialism could after all become a manager, or start his own company and not be so interested in socialism anymore. Happened all the time. That’s not a good deal if you’re a leftist politician. You want your underlings to stick around and be loyal, and the underclass doesn’t feel so oppressed if there’s not an underclass anymore. Of course, you can change class (in modern Western societies), but you can’t change biology. The average racial minority, the sexual deviant, the mentally ill, the fat cat lady, those will always be low status, always feel oppressed. That’s firm, absolute loyalty right there.<br /><br /><a href=\"https://bloodyshovel.wordpress.com/2019/01/21/tucker-carlsons-war-against-woke-capital-and-the-future-of-the-right/\" target=\"_blank\">https://bloodyshovel.wordpress.com/2019/01/21/tucker-carlsons-war-against-woke-capital-and-the-future-of-the-right/</a>",
"to": [
"https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public"
],
"cc": [
"https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/640719703836209172/followers"
],
"tag": [],
"url": "https://www.minds.com/newsfeed/934826881032716288",
"published": "2019-01-23T15:08:16+00:00",
"source": {
"content": "As we all know, the political left, born out of the chaos of the French Revolution, came of age when Karl Marx produced a working formula: class struggle. You go find the low status people in your country, tell them the world is divided in two sorts of people: them, and the guys on top of them. The guys on top are oppressors, the guys on the bottom are oppressed: if you, the oppressed follow me, we’ll turn the table, “liberate you” i.e. grab their stuff and their status and give it to you.\n\nThen after WW2 the Western left realized that the oppressor/oppressed template worked much better with groups disadvantaged biologically than with mere social class. Hence we got Bioleninism. The industrial worker who was so much into socialism could after all become a manager, or start his own company and not be so interested in socialism anymore. Happened all the time. That’s not a good deal if you’re a leftist politician. You want your underlings to stick around and be loyal, and the underclass doesn’t feel so oppressed if there’s not an underclass anymore. Of course, you can change class (in modern Western societies), but you can’t change biology. The average racial minority, the sexual deviant, the mentally ill, the fat cat lady, those will always be low status, always feel oppressed. That’s firm, absolute loyalty right there.\n\nhttps://bloodyshovel.wordpress.com/2019/01/21/tucker-carlsons-war-against-woke-capital-and-the-future-of-the-right/",
"mediaType": "text/plain"
}
},
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/640719703836209172/entities/urn:activity:934826881032716288/activity"
},
{
"type": "Create",
"actor": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/640719703836209172",
"object": {
"type": "Note",
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/640719703836209172/entities/urn:activity:930467093961678848",
"attributedTo": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/640719703836209172",
"content": "As a practical matter, so-called “third wave anti-racism” is really just a demand by non-whites that whites mitigate the realities of biology. They can’t say that so they have to use weird language and comical neologisms. The demand is that whites exhaust themselves maintaining a white bourgeois society, so that non-whites can enjoy first world comfort, without actually having to maintain it themselves. The new white man’s burden is whites living as despised helots in the societies they created.<br />...<br />Then you have the central tenet of third wave anti-racism, which is that whites, just by being white, are a burden on non-whites. Because whites want the best for their kids and want to live in safe neighborhoods, it means they live in places without convenient bus service. This is a burden on non-whites, as they don’t have easy access to whites and the societies they create. This is so-called white privilege. The only way to eliminate this is to eliminate white behavior, which would end the modern society.<br /><br />Instead, the new anti-racism regime is one where every white person is born guilty, tainted by the original sin of white racism. Therefore, just as man was condemned to toil outside of the Garden of Eden for eternity, whites are now condemned to pay the jizya in order to keep non-whites in comfortable modern lifestyles. That means open borders for formerly white countries and a metastasizing set of rules to govern the thoughts and speech of whites. The American jizya is about keeping non-whites happy.<br /><br />That’s the core argument of Ta-Nahesi Coates. In his jeremiad in favor of reparations, you’ll note he never actually puts a number on it. Reparations are, by definition, about making the other party whole. Coates rejects that such a number exists, because what he means by reparations is actually a recitation. He demands an endless recitation of the crimes committed by whites against blacks. This is to both punish whites in a material sense and to remind them that they are now in the inferior position.<br /><br />In order to understand the social justice movement, one must first replace the word “justice” with the word “vengeance.” It’s not about settling the books or making anyone whole. It is about establishing a new hierarchy in which whites are the infidels of the new multicultural empire, forever paying the jizya to keep modern society rolling. The point of the tax is not just to finance the system, but to lock in the moral relationships of the new multicultural empire, because it cannot exist without the jizya.<br /><br /><a href=\"http://thezman.com/wordpress/?p=16067\" target=\"_blank\">http://thezman.com/wordpress/?p=16067</a>",
"to": [
"https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public"
],
"cc": [
"https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/640719703836209172/followers"
],
"tag": [],
"url": "https://www.minds.com/newsfeed/930467093961678848",
"published": "2019-01-11T14:24:02+00:00",
"source": {
"content": "As a practical matter, so-called “third wave anti-racism” is really just a demand by non-whites that whites mitigate the realities of biology. They can’t say that so they have to use weird language and comical neologisms. The demand is that whites exhaust themselves maintaining a white bourgeois society, so that non-whites can enjoy first world comfort, without actually having to maintain it themselves. The new white man’s burden is whites living as despised helots in the societies they created.\n...\nThen you have the central tenet of third wave anti-racism, which is that whites, just by being white, are a burden on non-whites. Because whites want the best for their kids and want to live in safe neighborhoods, it means they live in places without convenient bus service. This is a burden on non-whites, as they don’t have easy access to whites and the societies they create. This is so-called white privilege. The only way to eliminate this is to eliminate white behavior, which would end the modern society.\n\nInstead, the new anti-racism regime is one where every white person is born guilty, tainted by the original sin of white racism. Therefore, just as man was condemned to toil outside of the Garden of Eden for eternity, whites are now condemned to pay the jizya in order to keep non-whites in comfortable modern lifestyles. That means open borders for formerly white countries and a metastasizing set of rules to govern the thoughts and speech of whites. The American jizya is about keeping non-whites happy.\n\nThat’s the core argument of Ta-Nahesi Coates. In his jeremiad in favor of reparations, you’ll note he never actually puts a number on it. Reparations are, by definition, about making the other party whole. Coates rejects that such a number exists, because what he means by reparations is actually a recitation. He demands an endless recitation of the crimes committed by whites against blacks. This is to both punish whites in a material sense and to remind them that they are now in the inferior position.\n\nIn order to understand the social justice movement, one must first replace the word “justice” with the word “vengeance.” It’s not about settling the books or making anyone whole. It is about establishing a new hierarchy in which whites are the infidels of the new multicultural empire, forever paying the jizya to keep modern society rolling. The point of the tax is not just to finance the system, but to lock in the moral relationships of the new multicultural empire, because it cannot exist without the jizya.\n\nhttp://thezman.com/wordpress/?p=16067",
"mediaType": "text/plain"
}
},
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/640719703836209172/entities/urn:activity:930467093961678848/activity"
}
],
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/640719703836209172/outbox",
"partOf": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/640719703836209172/outboxoutbox"
}