A small tool to view real-world ActivityPub objects as JSON! Enter a URL
or username from Mastodon or a similar service below, and we'll send a
request with
the right
Accept
header
to the server to view the underlying object.
{
"@context": "https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams",
"type": "OrderedCollectionPage",
"orderedItems": [
{
"type": "Create",
"actor": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/624198823098458113",
"object": {
"type": "Note",
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/624198823098458113/entities/urn:activity:1223421624634679296",
"attributedTo": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/624198823098458113",
"content": "God-damn SEC.<br /><br />Well, looks like the Fed is making it’s move on crypto because the old grey beards do not understand (or fear they can’t control) any change away from the big banks. And of bloody course, they decided to make my little pet coin the target of their legal thrust.<br /><br />At least I now know why LBC has started shaving off value on the exchanges. Me, I’m going full wallstreetbets retard on it tho. These hands, they diamond.<br /><br />More info here: <a href=\"https://helplbrysavecrypto.com/\" target=\"_blank\">https://helplbrysavecrypto.com/</a><br />More from the LBRY Inc Team: <a href=\"https://odysee.com/@lbry:3f/helplbrysavecrypto:b\" target=\"_blank\">https://odysee.com/@lbry:3f/helplbrysavecrypto:b</a>",
"to": [
"https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public"
],
"cc": [
"https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/624198823098458113/followers"
],
"tag": [],
"url": "https://www.minds.com/newsfeed/1223421624634679296",
"published": "2021-03-30T00:00:45+00:00",
"source": {
"content": "God-damn SEC.\n\nWell, looks like the Fed is making it’s move on crypto because the old grey beards do not understand (or fear they can’t control) any change away from the big banks. And of bloody course, they decided to make my little pet coin the target of their legal thrust.\n\nAt least I now know why LBC has started shaving off value on the exchanges. Me, I’m going full wallstreetbets retard on it tho. These hands, they diamond.\n\nMore info here: https://helplbrysavecrypto.com/\nMore from the LBRY Inc Team: https://odysee.com/@lbry:3f/helplbrysavecrypto:b",
"mediaType": "text/plain"
}
},
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/624198823098458113/entities/urn:activity:1223421624634679296/activity"
},
{
"type": "Create",
"actor": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/624198823098458113",
"object": {
"type": "Note",
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/624198823098458113/entities/urn:activity:1221649954184871936",
"attributedTo": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/624198823098458113",
"content": "Minds kicks off the <a href=\"https://www.minds.com/search?f=top&t=all&q=lolicaust\" title=\"#lolicaust\" class=\"u-url hashtag\" target=\"_blank\">#lolicaust</a>, afraid drawings could be the end of the site. Meanwhile, over on Reddit there's whatever the hell this is...<br /><br />(I'll edit this if he does make an unedited, uncensored version later)<br /><br /><a href=\"https://open.lbry.com/@TheQuartering:1/reddit-busted-protecting-the-worst-kind:8?r=7P4DmPuzxo85MUSPQt2WX8nrTifobgt3\" target=\"_blank\">https://open.lbry.com/@TheQuartering:1/reddit-busted-protecting-the-worst-kind:8?r=7P4DmPuzxo85MUSPQt2WX8nrTifobgt3</a>",
"to": [
"https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public"
],
"cc": [
"https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/624198823098458113/followers"
],
"tag": [],
"url": "https://www.minds.com/newsfeed/1221649954184871936",
"published": "2021-03-25T02:40:46+00:00",
"source": {
"content": "Minds kicks off the #lolicaust, afraid drawings could be the end of the site. Meanwhile, over on Reddit there's whatever the hell this is...\n\n(I'll edit this if he does make an unedited, uncensored version later)\n\nhttps://open.lbry.com/@TheQuartering:1/reddit-busted-protecting-the-worst-kind:8?r=7P4DmPuzxo85MUSPQt2WX8nrTifobgt3",
"mediaType": "text/plain"
}
},
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/624198823098458113/entities/urn:activity:1221649954184871936/activity"
},
{
"type": "Create",
"actor": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/624198823098458113",
"object": {
"type": "Note",
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/624198823098458113/entities/urn:activity:1221597788111880192",
"attributedTo": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/624198823098458113",
"content": "Shamelessly stolen from a discord somewhere.",
"to": [
"https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public"
],
"cc": [
"https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/624198823098458113/followers"
],
"tag": [],
"url": "https://www.minds.com/newsfeed/1221597788111880192",
"published": "2021-03-24T23:13:27+00:00",
"source": {
"content": "Shamelessly stolen from a discord somewhere.",
"mediaType": "text/plain"
}
},
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/624198823098458113/entities/urn:activity:1221597788111880192/activity"
},
{
"type": "Create",
"actor": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/624198823098458113",
"object": {
"type": "Note",
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/624198823098458113/entities/urn:activity:1221354892462395392",
"attributedTo": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/624198823098458113",
"content": "Reminded not just because I'm 100% with it, but as a note to look up that story about the piss cross. Sounds both disgusting and fascinating as well as a bit before my time. Yey for history.",
"to": [
"https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public"
],
"cc": [
"https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/624198823098458113/followers",
"https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/591640940989394945"
],
"tag": [],
"url": "https://www.minds.com/newsfeed/1221354892462395392",
"published": "2021-03-24T07:08:18+00:00",
"inReplyTo": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/591640940989394945/entities/urn:activity:1221314407897743360",
"source": {
"content": "Reminded not just because I'm 100% with it, but as a note to look up that story about the piss cross. Sounds both disgusting and fascinating as well as a bit before my time. Yey for history.",
"mediaType": "text/plain"
}
},
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/624198823098458113/entities/urn:activity:1221354892462395392/activity"
},
{
"type": "Create",
"actor": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/624198823098458113",
"object": {
"type": "Note",
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/624198823098458113/entities/urn:activity:1221326116596748288",
"attributedTo": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/624198823098458113",
"content": "It's come to my attention that there is some folks possibly mass-reporting back at the moralfags going after loli/anime in general. Putting this out here now, I'm not supporting that shit. I do not care to become the moralfag, so I shall shun their tactics. If taking the highroads means losing Minds to becoming Twitter 2.0, then so be it. I'm not going to make Minds a toxic swamp to avoid it becoming a toxic swamp. Just does not compute.<br /><br />Edit: Took about abit with me being a bit hypercritically being in support of the AWS thing. Much as hoasting wood-chipper enthusiasts by their own standard, ie 'it risks the site', would be cathartic (christ they're bad at making an intelligent point), well... I complain about big tech censorship enough to know how shitty running to Amazon is. So no, still not supporting that.",
"to": [
"https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public"
],
"cc": [
"https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/624198823098458113/followers"
],
"tag": [],
"url": "https://www.minds.com/newsfeed/1221326116596748288",
"published": "2021-03-24T05:13:57+00:00",
"source": {
"content": "It's come to my attention that there is some folks possibly mass-reporting back at the moralfags going after loli/anime in general. Putting this out here now, I'm not supporting that shit. I do not care to become the moralfag, so I shall shun their tactics. If taking the highroads means losing Minds to becoming Twitter 2.0, then so be it. I'm not going to make Minds a toxic swamp to avoid it becoming a toxic swamp. Just does not compute.\n\nEdit: Took about abit with me being a bit hypercritically being in support of the AWS thing. Much as hoasting wood-chipper enthusiasts by their own standard, ie 'it risks the site', would be cathartic (christ they're bad at making an intelligent point), well... I complain about big tech censorship enough to know how shitty running to Amazon is. So no, still not supporting that.",
"mediaType": "text/plain"
}
},
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/624198823098458113/entities/urn:activity:1221326116596748288/activity"
},
{
"type": "Announce",
"actor": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/624198823098458113",
"object": {
"type": "Note",
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/619002093448998913/entities/urn:activity:1221261114125783040",
"attributedTo": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/619002093448998913",
"content": "<a class=\"u-url mention\" href=\"https://www.minds.com/ottman\" target=\"_blank\">@ottman</a>, people are abusing your report feature to get people banned for posting or defending the ability to post LEGAL NSFW content, and are proudly proclaiming this on your post.<br /><br />Address this growing issue and restore any affected accounts.<br /><br />Upvote and Remind to spread this message.",
"to": [
"https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public"
],
"cc": [
"https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/619002093448998913/followers"
],
"tag": [
{
"type": "Mention",
"href": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/100000000000000000",
"name": "@ottman"
}
],
"url": "https://www.minds.com/newsfeed/1221261114125783040",
"published": "2021-03-24T00:55:38+00:00",
"source": {
"content": "@ottman, people are abusing your report feature to get people banned for posting or defending the ability to post LEGAL NSFW content, and are proudly proclaiming this on your post.\n\nAddress this growing issue and restore any affected accounts.\n\nUpvote and Remind to spread this message.",
"mediaType": "text/plain"
}
},
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/624198823098458113/entities/urn:activity:1221316739450015744/activity",
"to": [
"https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public"
],
"cc": [
"https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/619002093448998913",
"https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/624198823098458113/followers"
]
},
{
"type": "Announce",
"actor": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/624198823098458113",
"object": {
"type": "Note",
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1195512261469282321/entities/urn:activity:1220450045767233536",
"attributedTo": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1195512261469282321",
"content": "AN OPEN LETTER TO <a class=\"u-url mention\" href=\"https://www.minds.com/ottman\" target=\"_blank\">@ottman</a><br /><br />Dear Bill,<br /><br />I've been participating in the lolicon drama for a couple of days, and I can't help noticing we are in a bit of a stalemate. My side is unhappy to the point of transforming into an aggressive feces-throwing mob. However, I also don't think you are happy to become yet another icon of internet censorship. I do believe that there was some ideology behind the creation of Minds. So let me reflect on how we got to where we are.<br /><br />About my side: why can't we just agree? Many of us aren't even fans of lolicon/shotacon. Why can't we save our energy for the real battles? ...Well, because this one is real enough. I'm sure you've seen the text already, but let me point to it once again: there's a great essay by Neil Gaiman precisely on how lolicon issues belong to the big landscape of censorship. My signature is under every word.<br /><br />About your side: why can't you just agree? It's crystal clear that most of the pro-loli crowd has nothing to do with real pedophilia. Why can't you just leave lolicon alone? ...Well, because American legislature is a damned mess. There's a long-standing conflict of PROTECT Act and the First Amendment with a bunch of contradictory Supreme Court cases, there are obscenity laws with Miller test that literally suggests legally debating the concept of artistic value, there is the phrase \"identifiable minor\" which admits two drastically different readings -- it's a total mess and you don't want to bury yourself under this mess.<br /><br />I got it that you cannot take a firm pro-loli stand. Still, here are some things that you CAN do:<br /><br />1. Ban as little as possible. Switch off automated bans: mass reporting shouldn't become a tool of bullying. The creepiest part of lolicon is photorealistic? Then stick to that. Also, I've heard that pro-loli crowd is intending to mass-post non-hentai loli -- don't ban those.<br /><br />2. Confirm that this legal mess is bad, and that you'd personally like to see it resolved in a pro-freedom manner, which means allowing cartoons if they don't depict real people. Wouldn't this be so much better for all the community here? Demanding for the clarification/change of legislature isn't illegal.<br /><br />3. Support Comic Book Legal Defence Fund. Maybe invite them here to moderate dramas like this one? Their mission is good.<br /><br />This wouldn't solve the conflict, I know. But it would be so much better than just ignoring the conflict and calling us fakes. I mean, there's a reason why all of us are here.<br /><br />I understand it must be annoying to have this discussion when next door, Zuckerberg censors female nipples and people still use his platform. But declaring yourself pro-freedom has its costs. I hope it also has its rewards.<br /><br />Yours, <br />Polydarya aka Dasha Poliakova,<br />a Russian non-bot ;) <br /><br /><a href=\"https://www.minds.com/search?f=top&t=all&q=lolicon\" title=\"#lolicon\" class=\"u-url hashtag\" target=\"_blank\">#lolicon</a> <a href=\"https://www.minds.com/search?f=top&t=all&q=loli\" title=\"#loli\" class=\"u-url hashtag\" target=\"_blank\">#loli</a> <a href=\"https://www.minds.com/search?f=top&t=all&q=loligate\" title=\"#loligate\" class=\"u-url hashtag\" target=\"_blank\">#loligate</a> <a href=\"https://www.minds.com/search?f=top&t=all&q=freespeech\" title=\"#freespeech\" class=\"u-url hashtag\" target=\"_blank\">#freespeech</a> <a href=\"https://www.minds.com/search?f=top&t=all&q=censorship\" title=\"#censorship\" class=\"u-url hashtag\" target=\"_blank\">#censorship</a> ",
"to": [
"https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public"
],
"cc": [
"https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1195512261469282321/followers"
],
"tag": [
{
"type": "Mention",
"href": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/100000000000000000",
"name": "@ottman"
}
],
"url": "https://www.minds.com/newsfeed/1220450045767233536",
"published": "2021-03-21T19:12:45+00:00",
"source": {
"content": "AN OPEN LETTER TO @ottman\n\nDear Bill,\n\nI've been participating in the lolicon drama for a couple of days, and I can't help noticing we are in a bit of a stalemate. My side is unhappy to the point of transforming into an aggressive feces-throwing mob. However, I also don't think you are happy to become yet another icon of internet censorship. I do believe that there was some ideology behind the creation of Minds. So let me reflect on how we got to where we are.\n\nAbout my side: why can't we just agree? Many of us aren't even fans of lolicon/shotacon. Why can't we save our energy for the real battles? ...Well, because this one is real enough. I'm sure you've seen the text already, but let me point to it once again: there's a great essay by Neil Gaiman precisely on how lolicon issues belong to the big landscape of censorship. My signature is under every word.\n\nAbout your side: why can't you just agree? It's crystal clear that most of the pro-loli crowd has nothing to do with real pedophilia. Why can't you just leave lolicon alone? ...Well, because American legislature is a damned mess. There's a long-standing conflict of PROTECT Act and the First Amendment with a bunch of contradictory Supreme Court cases, there are obscenity laws with Miller test that literally suggests legally debating the concept of artistic value, there is the phrase \"identifiable minor\" which admits two drastically different readings -- it's a total mess and you don't want to bury yourself under this mess.\n\nI got it that you cannot take a firm pro-loli stand. Still, here are some things that you CAN do:\n\n1. Ban as little as possible. Switch off automated bans: mass reporting shouldn't become a tool of bullying. The creepiest part of lolicon is photorealistic? Then stick to that. Also, I've heard that pro-loli crowd is intending to mass-post non-hentai loli -- don't ban those.\n\n2. Confirm that this legal mess is bad, and that you'd personally like to see it resolved in a pro-freedom manner, which means allowing cartoons if they don't depict real people. Wouldn't this be so much better for all the community here? Demanding for the clarification/change of legislature isn't illegal.\n\n3. Support Comic Book Legal Defence Fund. Maybe invite them here to moderate dramas like this one? Their mission is good.\n\nThis wouldn't solve the conflict, I know. But it would be so much better than just ignoring the conflict and calling us fakes. I mean, there's a reason why all of us are here.\n\nI understand it must be annoying to have this discussion when next door, Zuckerberg censors female nipples and people still use his platform. But declaring yourself pro-freedom has its costs. I hope it also has its rewards.\n\nYours, \nPolydarya aka Dasha Poliakova,\na Russian non-bot ;) \n\n#lolicon #loli #loligate #freespeech #censorship ",
"mediaType": "text/plain"
}
},
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/624198823098458113/entities/urn:activity:1221118276391649280/activity",
"to": [
"https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public"
],
"cc": [
"https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1195512261469282321",
"https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/624198823098458113/followers"
]
},
{
"type": "Create",
"actor": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/624198823098458113",
"object": {
"type": "Note",
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/624198823098458113/entities/urn:activity:1220841645334335488",
"attributedTo": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/624198823098458113",
"content": "Went ahead and made a neckbeard account: neckbeard.xyz/darkalleyrambler<br /><br />Not sure if it will be temporary or not but going to be following as many of the nice folks I've seen since I started my brief lurking period on here as well as hopefully many of the old smugloli peeps I used to follow.",
"to": [
"https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public"
],
"cc": [
"https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/624198823098458113/followers"
],
"tag": [],
"url": "https://www.minds.com/newsfeed/1220841645334335488",
"published": "2021-03-22T21:08:50+00:00",
"source": {
"content": "Went ahead and made a neckbeard account: neckbeard.xyz/darkalleyrambler\n\nNot sure if it will be temporary or not but going to be following as many of the nice folks I've seen since I started my brief lurking period on here as well as hopefully many of the old smugloli peeps I used to follow.",
"mediaType": "text/plain"
}
},
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/624198823098458113/entities/urn:activity:1220841645334335488/activity"
},
{
"type": "Create",
"actor": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/624198823098458113",
"object": {
"type": "Note",
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/624198823098458113/entities/urn:activity:1220569869965111296",
"attributedTo": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/624198823098458113",
"content": "Hrm, didn't ever have time to set up a federated plemora server (or for that matter, begin researching how to even do that) this weekend. Starting to wonder if I should just join one. I *would* like to have my own set up so I can go all 'my private data is rigged to explode' on it but ... well, I'm lazy and I only talk at myself most times on social media anyway. And like lewds and memes. Yeah, I mostly just throw likes around.<br /><br />So, throwing this out there, if I join an existing server what is recommended?<br /><br />I'm basically looking for:<br />loli allowed (and generally any nsfw allowed because loli is like ... a thin slice of my lewd intake)<br />no one minds me going off on some random topic (like lbry coding if I ever get off my ass on that)<br />is not so blocked so much I can't follow on other fediverse servers (care least about this)<br /><br />Thinking of neckbeard since I've seen some other old mind folks posting about it but I thought I'd check around for other opinions.<br /><br />Yes, also thinly still on the wait and see train but ... well I've put my hope in Ottman before and saw how dust that ball collected.",
"to": [
"https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public"
],
"cc": [
"https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/624198823098458113/followers"
],
"tag": [],
"url": "https://www.minds.com/newsfeed/1220569869965111296",
"published": "2021-03-22T03:08:54+00:00",
"source": {
"content": "Hrm, didn't ever have time to set up a federated plemora server (or for that matter, begin researching how to even do that) this weekend. Starting to wonder if I should just join one. I *would* like to have my own set up so I can go all 'my private data is rigged to explode' on it but ... well, I'm lazy and I only talk at myself most times on social media anyway. And like lewds and memes. Yeah, I mostly just throw likes around.\n\nSo, throwing this out there, if I join an existing server what is recommended?\n\nI'm basically looking for:\nloli allowed (and generally any nsfw allowed because loli is like ... a thin slice of my lewd intake)\nno one minds me going off on some random topic (like lbry coding if I ever get off my ass on that)\nis not so blocked so much I can't follow on other fediverse servers (care least about this)\n\nThinking of neckbeard since I've seen some other old mind folks posting about it but I thought I'd check around for other opinions.\n\nYes, also thinly still on the wait and see train but ... well I've put my hope in Ottman before and saw how dust that ball collected.",
"mediaType": "text/plain"
}
},
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/624198823098458113/entities/urn:activity:1220569869965111296/activity"
},
{
"type": "Create",
"actor": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/624198823098458113",
"object": {
"type": "Note",
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/624198823098458113/entities/urn:activity:1220183780272156672",
"attributedTo": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/624198823098458113",
"content": "Well, I think a good consensus at the moment is, don't jump ship just yet on Minds but be ready. At least, I'm seeing that bandied about a lot. As an old fogy at this platform (at least it feels like) I can say I did before and well ... things did move on and calm down. I suspect then and now Ottman will 'make an examples' to appease the trad horde then get back to more productive things with his time.<br /><br />Of course, we've all seen this shite before tho and know what can happen when the horde taste blood in the water.<br /><br />So, to the artists worried about their art, may I suggest LBRY. It's a decentralized alt-media platform that is mostly used by youtubers but can host all kinds of media. Comic books, pictures, novels, any kind of static media files basically.<br /><br />Now with this suggestion, I will say: use the apps. They run more on the protocol, LBRY, than the company site Odysee does. On Odysee, they are making similar noises as Minds at the moment. You can't have NSFW show up on Odysee, for example. Not a problem, or as much of one, on the apps. And if they boot you off their content hosting, the apps are also p2p (and it mostly works).<br /><br />Hey, I tip there with my crypto as well. It'd be nice if I could actually get some artists on there so I could get to tipping. They also have auto-tips by views, by the by.<br /><br />As for folks who just peruse, I'm including a link to a spreadsheet I recently did. Basically, calculates a budget for your tips and gives you a 1 to 5 rating to tip on how much you like something. Cause, despite what the moralfags think, I am neither a simp nor childish with my finances.<br /><br />Who knows, if we can get enough artists over there, it might attract more code-bros to help shore up the code for the decentralized parts. God knows relying on my coding skills to keep the lewd in LBRY is a bad idea, lol.<br /><br />Also, get on a social media site that is actually federated. These centralizer sites will be the end of all of us, just you wait and see.<br /><br /><a href=\"https://www.minds.com/search?f=top&t=all&q=lolicaust\" title=\"#lolicaust\" class=\"u-url hashtag\" target=\"_blank\">#lolicaust</a><br /><br /><a href=\"https://open.lbry.com/@darkalleyrambler:1/LBRY_Tip_Calculator_And_Coding_Goals:7?r=7P4DmPuzxo85MUSPQt2WX8nrTifobgt3\" target=\"_blank\">https://open.lbry.com/@darkalleyrambler:1/LBRY_Tip_Calculator_And_Coding_Goals:7?r=7P4DmPuzxo85MUSPQt2WX8nrTifobgt3</a>",
"to": [
"https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public"
],
"cc": [
"https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/624198823098458113/followers"
],
"tag": [],
"url": "https://www.minds.com/newsfeed/1220183780272156672",
"published": "2021-03-21T01:34:43+00:00",
"source": {
"content": "Well, I think a good consensus at the moment is, don't jump ship just yet on Minds but be ready. At least, I'm seeing that bandied about a lot. As an old fogy at this platform (at least it feels like) I can say I did before and well ... things did move on and calm down. I suspect then and now Ottman will 'make an examples' to appease the trad horde then get back to more productive things with his time.\n\nOf course, we've all seen this shite before tho and know what can happen when the horde taste blood in the water.\n\nSo, to the artists worried about their art, may I suggest LBRY. It's a decentralized alt-media platform that is mostly used by youtubers but can host all kinds of media. Comic books, pictures, novels, any kind of static media files basically.\n\nNow with this suggestion, I will say: use the apps. They run more on the protocol, LBRY, than the company site Odysee does. On Odysee, they are making similar noises as Minds at the moment. You can't have NSFW show up on Odysee, for example. Not a problem, or as much of one, on the apps. And if they boot you off their content hosting, the apps are also p2p (and it mostly works).\n\nHey, I tip there with my crypto as well. It'd be nice if I could actually get some artists on there so I could get to tipping. They also have auto-tips by views, by the by.\n\nAs for folks who just peruse, I'm including a link to a spreadsheet I recently did. Basically, calculates a budget for your tips and gives you a 1 to 5 rating to tip on how much you like something. Cause, despite what the moralfags think, I am neither a simp nor childish with my finances.\n\nWho knows, if we can get enough artists over there, it might attract more code-bros to help shore up the code for the decentralized parts. God knows relying on my coding skills to keep the lewd in LBRY is a bad idea, lol.\n\nAlso, get on a social media site that is actually federated. These centralizer sites will be the end of all of us, just you wait and see.\n\n#lolicaust\n\nhttps://open.lbry.com/@darkalleyrambler:1/LBRY_Tip_Calculator_And_Coding_Goals:7?r=7P4DmPuzxo85MUSPQt2WX8nrTifobgt3",
"mediaType": "text/plain"
}
},
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/624198823098458113/entities/urn:activity:1220183780272156672/activity"
},
{
"type": "Announce",
"actor": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/624198823098458113",
"object": {
"type": "Note",
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1196605925541027846/entities/urn:activity:1220151933381804032",
"attributedTo": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1196605925541027846",
"content": "I'll try not to make it a habit to post my takes, but here goes. There's a point in the controversy going on in minds that needs to be addressed but I haven't seen anybody take it on. If you have, let me know in the comments.<br /><br />It involves axiomatic assumptions on the part of those arguing, and that's how loli, and therefore how CP, is defined- more to the point, how the moral crusaders responsible for the bans define it.<br /><br />The broad assumption by the people in favor of the bans seems to be that loli is, and will remain, defined solely as \"pornographic material depicting children being exploited or abused.\" I recall many Americans, myself included, made a similar assumption about how \"racism\" would stay defined as \"actual prejudice against people on the basis of their race.\" <br /><br />This assumption was proven woefully incorrect, as anyone who's seen the outrage concerning how \"Being kind to dogs\" is racist and how depicting a character of slightly fairer skin tone than usual is racist can tell you. <br /><br />The three characters pictured above have all been condemned for being loli and therefore being objectionable on the same level as CP. You'll notice I didn't say \"Porn of these characters\" was condemned as CP material, but the characters themselves have fallen under the umbrella on incredibly thin pretenses. Clearly, obscenity is not the defining factor. <br /><br />The most understandable may be Gawr Gura, on the left. She got hit with the \"Loli\" sticker on the basis of her slight frame and short stature as a character. This is despite whatever's gleaned from the actress making it clear that she's an adult (has had other jobs, lives alone, her childhood stories clearly take place in the late 90s to early 2000s, etc.). <br /><br />So the slight frame and short stature combined that might be MISTAKEN for a child is the defining line, right? <br /><br />Wrong.<br /><br />On the right is Iruru (or Ilulu, depending on how you translate it), who's been condemned as the Oppai loli, on the basis that she's way shorter than the average woman. She's also a dragon, so age becomes an irrelevant factor because of the \"3000 year old vampire loli\" argument, so the appearance is clearly the only relevant factor, but apparently bust size and physical development is not. <br /><br />Okay, so it's the height, right? <br /><br />Wrong.<br /><br />In the center, you might've seen her around a lot, Uzaki-chan. The character is explicitly a college student, on the lower end of average height for a Japanese woman, and has very clearly gone through puberty with her breast size. Just about everything here should be fine, right?<br /><br />Wrong. <br /><br />She's too \"Youthful,\" on the basis of her eyes and her personality. <br /><br />All of these were controversies that started on twitter over the characters themselves, with only a token mention of NSFW fanart made of them, if any mention at all. The characters needed not be part of lewd material at all- the potential that they MAY be was enough, and someone finding a single arbitrary characteristic that made them uncomfortable, regardless of other factors, was enough for them to be slapped with the label \"Loli,\" which is treated as synonymous with CP. <br /><br />That's what I'm worried about happening on minds. I have no issue at all with real CP being taken down, but that's because it involves the actual abuse of children. I actually dislike a lot of loli art, but I've also seen things that I would've never called loli not only being referred to as such, but being EQUATED with CP, in much the same way that I would have never called \"Being kind to dogs\" racist, and never would have equated it with a Klan Lynching, and certainly not based on its \"Potential\" to lead to such an act.<br /><br />I fear the definition has already expanded, especially because people already have equated the clearly-college-student-with-clearly-developed-big-boobs Uzaki Chan with footage of the sexual abuse of a five-year-old. <br /><br />Do I think this will lead to Minds banning all art from the platform? I don't know. I'm not sure what to think. I never thought being nice to my dog would be racist, but here we are. I learned not to discount the possibility that the most sensitive, loudest voices on this platform will demand the most nonsensical things and be catered to by those in charge. I've already seen it happen elsewhere.<br /><br />I'm not quite ready to pack my bags and leave, but the developments are not encouraging. Many of you may be quick to tell me \"Minds isn't Twitter,\" and I grant that. Maybe people here are more reasonable, but what I've seen isn't encouraging. I'm worried Minds is beginning to resemble Twitter in exactly the ways that drove me away from birdapp in the first place.<br /><br />Sorry, rant over. If I do decide to leave, I'll let ya'll know where I'm going.",
"to": [
"https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public"
],
"cc": [
"https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1196605925541027846/followers"
],
"tag": [],
"url": "https://www.minds.com/newsfeed/1220151933381804032",
"published": "2021-03-20T23:28:09+00:00",
"source": {
"content": "I'll try not to make it a habit to post my takes, but here goes. There's a point in the controversy going on in minds that needs to be addressed but I haven't seen anybody take it on. If you have, let me know in the comments.\n\nIt involves axiomatic assumptions on the part of those arguing, and that's how loli, and therefore how CP, is defined- more to the point, how the moral crusaders responsible for the bans define it.\n\nThe broad assumption by the people in favor of the bans seems to be that loli is, and will remain, defined solely as \"pornographic material depicting children being exploited or abused.\" I recall many Americans, myself included, made a similar assumption about how \"racism\" would stay defined as \"actual prejudice against people on the basis of their race.\" \n\nThis assumption was proven woefully incorrect, as anyone who's seen the outrage concerning how \"Being kind to dogs\" is racist and how depicting a character of slightly fairer skin tone than usual is racist can tell you. \n\nThe three characters pictured above have all been condemned for being loli and therefore being objectionable on the same level as CP. You'll notice I didn't say \"Porn of these characters\" was condemned as CP material, but the characters themselves have fallen under the umbrella on incredibly thin pretenses. Clearly, obscenity is not the defining factor. \n\nThe most understandable may be Gawr Gura, on the left. She got hit with the \"Loli\" sticker on the basis of her slight frame and short stature as a character. This is despite whatever's gleaned from the actress making it clear that she's an adult (has had other jobs, lives alone, her childhood stories clearly take place in the late 90s to early 2000s, etc.). \n\nSo the slight frame and short stature combined that might be MISTAKEN for a child is the defining line, right? \n\nWrong.\n\nOn the right is Iruru (or Ilulu, depending on how you translate it), who's been condemned as the Oppai loli, on the basis that she's way shorter than the average woman. She's also a dragon, so age becomes an irrelevant factor because of the \"3000 year old vampire loli\" argument, so the appearance is clearly the only relevant factor, but apparently bust size and physical development is not. \n\nOkay, so it's the height, right? \n\nWrong.\n\nIn the center, you might've seen her around a lot, Uzaki-chan. The character is explicitly a college student, on the lower end of average height for a Japanese woman, and has very clearly gone through puberty with her breast size. Just about everything here should be fine, right?\n\nWrong. \n\nShe's too \"Youthful,\" on the basis of her eyes and her personality. \n\nAll of these were controversies that started on twitter over the characters themselves, with only a token mention of NSFW fanart made of them, if any mention at all. The characters needed not be part of lewd material at all- the potential that they MAY be was enough, and someone finding a single arbitrary characteristic that made them uncomfortable, regardless of other factors, was enough for them to be slapped with the label \"Loli,\" which is treated as synonymous with CP. \n\nThat's what I'm worried about happening on minds. I have no issue at all with real CP being taken down, but that's because it involves the actual abuse of children. I actually dislike a lot of loli art, but I've also seen things that I would've never called loli not only being referred to as such, but being EQUATED with CP, in much the same way that I would have never called \"Being kind to dogs\" racist, and never would have equated it with a Klan Lynching, and certainly not based on its \"Potential\" to lead to such an act.\n\nI fear the definition has already expanded, especially because people already have equated the clearly-college-student-with-clearly-developed-big-boobs Uzaki Chan with footage of the sexual abuse of a five-year-old. \n\nDo I think this will lead to Minds banning all art from the platform? I don't know. I'm not sure what to think. I never thought being nice to my dog would be racist, but here we are. I learned not to discount the possibility that the most sensitive, loudest voices on this platform will demand the most nonsensical things and be catered to by those in charge. I've already seen it happen elsewhere.\n\nI'm not quite ready to pack my bags and leave, but the developments are not encouraging. Many of you may be quick to tell me \"Minds isn't Twitter,\" and I grant that. Maybe people here are more reasonable, but what I've seen isn't encouraging. I'm worried Minds is beginning to resemble Twitter in exactly the ways that drove me away from birdapp in the first place.\n\nSorry, rant over. If I do decide to leave, I'll let ya'll know where I'm going.",
"mediaType": "text/plain"
}
},
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/624198823098458113/entities/urn:activity:1220176717801410560/activity",
"to": [
"https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public"
],
"cc": [
"https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1196605925541027846",
"https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/624198823098458113/followers"
]
},
{
"type": "Create",
"actor": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/624198823098458113",
"object": {
"type": "Note",
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/624198823098458113/entities/urn:activity:1220122859020570624",
"attributedTo": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/624198823098458113",
"content": "I really wish I could quote tweet replies because I think my favorite concave brain take I've seen out of the latest batch of anti-loli crusaders is: what do you mean ranting about pedos could mean I'm secretly a pedo? When has that happened? Those are too few instances, clearly anyone using my arguments is a well balanced individual and against me is a demon infested corpse of a human that should be feed to the woodchipper. So what if you have more examples, your were morally wrong from the get go.<br /><br />(I am, of course and possibly with a very biased degree, paraphrasing since I can't find the posts now. I *really* should screenshot more. Or at all.)<br /><br />Anywho, I just find it funny. It's the anti-loli equivalent of feminists defending their \"male allies\" back in the day. Their moral, surely they can't be doing harm outside of *very few, obviously outlier examples*. Sometimes, my friends, its not even about your stances. It's about the mindset you use to advance your arguments that reveal how shitty of a person you are, lol.<br /><br />In case anyone is wondering, doing shitty things makes you a shitty person and saying good things does not make you a good person is my stance. Want to be good, do good in the world. And not the internet for bloody sakes.",
"to": [
"https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public"
],
"cc": [
"https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/624198823098458113/followers"
],
"tag": [],
"url": "https://www.minds.com/newsfeed/1220122859020570624",
"published": "2021-03-20T21:32:38+00:00",
"source": {
"content": "I really wish I could quote tweet replies because I think my favorite concave brain take I've seen out of the latest batch of anti-loli crusaders is: what do you mean ranting about pedos could mean I'm secretly a pedo? When has that happened? Those are too few instances, clearly anyone using my arguments is a well balanced individual and against me is a demon infested corpse of a human that should be feed to the woodchipper. So what if you have more examples, your were morally wrong from the get go.\n\n(I am, of course and possibly with a very biased degree, paraphrasing since I can't find the posts now. I *really* should screenshot more. Or at all.)\n\nAnywho, I just find it funny. It's the anti-loli equivalent of feminists defending their \"male allies\" back in the day. Their moral, surely they can't be doing harm outside of *very few, obviously outlier examples*. Sometimes, my friends, its not even about your stances. It's about the mindset you use to advance your arguments that reveal how shitty of a person you are, lol.\n\nIn case anyone is wondering, doing shitty things makes you a shitty person and saying good things does not make you a good person is my stance. Want to be good, do good in the world. And not the internet for bloody sakes.",
"mediaType": "text/plain"
}
},
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/624198823098458113/entities/urn:activity:1220122859020570624/activity"
},
{
"type": "Announce",
"actor": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/624198823098458113",
"object": {
"type": "Note",
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/974177059230195723/entities/urn:activity:1220108499837157376",
"attributedTo": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/974177059230195723",
"content": "<a href=\"https://www.minds.com/search?f=top&t=all&q=Lolicaust\" title=\"#Lolicaust\" class=\"u-url hashtag\" target=\"_blank\">#Lolicaust</a> ",
"to": [
"https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public"
],
"cc": [
"https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/974177059230195723/followers"
],
"tag": [],
"url": "https://www.minds.com/newsfeed/1220108499837157376",
"published": "2021-03-20T20:35:33+00:00",
"source": {
"content": "#Lolicaust ",
"mediaType": "text/plain"
}
},
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/624198823098458113/entities/urn:activity:1220118187421106176/activity",
"to": [
"https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public"
],
"cc": [
"https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/974177059230195723",
"https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/624198823098458113/followers"
]
}
],
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/624198823098458113/outbox",
"partOf": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/624198823098458113/outboxoutbox"
}