A small tool to view real-world ActivityPub objects as JSON! Enter a URL
or username from Mastodon or a similar service below, and we'll send a
request with
the right
Accept
header
to the server to view the underlying object.
{
"@context": "https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams",
"type": "OrderedCollectionPage",
"orderedItems": [
{
"type": "Create",
"actor": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/618490680515239941",
"object": {
"type": "Note",
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/618490680515239941/entities/urn:activity:633897040794886164",
"attributedTo": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/618490680515239941",
"content": "GUYS BREAKING BIG NEWS REVELATION IDEA CAPSLOCK<br /><br />I just realized something about the election and politics and general craziness of 2016:<br /><br />what if...<br /><br />It's all just the world's greatest,<br />most well-planned,<br />most top secret,<br />most convoluted...<br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /> prank<br /><br /><br /><br />... and everyone is unknowingly bound to play into it because of sheer intangible power of the fact that it is in fact currentyear.<br /><br />When you really think about it, the year 2016 has all the telltale signs of a social experiment prank:<br />\"gone wrong\" = Trump 2016, terrorism attacks, Clinton scandals, social media censorship, and like billions of famous people died<br />\"gone sexual\" = \"grab 'em by the pussy\"<br />\"almost got shot/killed\" = except people DID actually get shot/killed<br />\"got attacked\" = people also got attacked<br /><br /><br />Guys this could be<br />A YUUUUUUUUUGE<br />GAME-BREAKING<br />CAMPAIGN-ENDING<br />GUT-BUSTING<br />FART-SNIFFIN (eww)<br />~ ~ ~ S C A N D A L ~ ~ ~<br /><br />Make sure to spread the word on facebook and twitter and minds and myspace and geocities and club penguin and bathroom stall graffiti !!1!!1!1!1!1!!!one!!111!<br /><br />...also remember to not to forget to buy my not-in-any-way-exceptionally-dubious supplements<br />theyrenothallucinogensIswearAAAAAAAAAAAA",
"to": [
"https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public"
],
"cc": [
"https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/618490680515239941/followers"
],
"tag": [],
"url": "https://www.minds.com/newsfeed/633897040794886164",
"published": "2016-10-15T05:20:31+00:00",
"source": {
"content": "GUYS BREAKING BIG NEWS REVELATION IDEA CAPSLOCK\n\nI just realized something about the election and politics and general craziness of 2016:\n\nwhat if...\n\nIt's all just the world's greatest,\nmost well-planned,\nmost top secret,\nmost convoluted...\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n prank\n\n\n\n... and everyone is unknowingly bound to play into it because of sheer intangible power of the fact that it is in fact currentyear.\n\nWhen you really think about it, the year 2016 has all the telltale signs of a social experiment prank:\n\"gone wrong\" = Trump 2016, terrorism attacks, Clinton scandals, social media censorship, and like billions of famous people died\n\"gone sexual\" = \"grab 'em by the pussy\"\n\"almost got shot/killed\" = except people DID actually get shot/killed\n\"got attacked\" = people also got attacked\n\n\nGuys this could be\nA YUUUUUUUUUGE\nGAME-BREAKING\nCAMPAIGN-ENDING\nGUT-BUSTING\nFART-SNIFFIN (eww)\n~ ~ ~ S C A N D A L ~ ~ ~\n\nMake sure to spread the word on facebook and twitter and minds and myspace and geocities and club penguin and bathroom stall graffiti !!1!!1!1!1!1!!!one!!111!\n\n...also remember to not to forget to buy my not-in-any-way-exceptionally-dubious supplements\ntheyrenothallucinogensIswearAAAAAAAAAAAA",
"mediaType": "text/plain"
}
},
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/618490680515239941/entities/urn:activity:633897040794886164/activity"
},
{
"type": "Create",
"actor": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/618490680515239941",
"object": {
"type": "Note",
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/618490680515239941/entities/urn:activity:625900784726319119",
"attributedTo": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/618490680515239941",
"content": "Minds Feature Idea: Open, Rational Argument Mapping<br /><br />Perhaps it could be productive to rational debate to implement a feature where there are public debate \"hubs\" and each hub has some controversial topic as its theme and anyone could join that hub and make arguments supporting or opposing whatever topic the hub is about.<br />I imagine that the pro and con arguments could be laid out in a hierarchical tree as described in this blog post (not mine) about argument mapping here: <a href=\"https://timvangelder.com/2016/07/16/argument-mapping-with-word-smartart/\" target=\"_blank\">https://timvangelder.com/2016/07/16/argument-mapping-with-word-smartart/</a>. It seems that this particular formulation of a structured-argument-organizing-thing would be relatively easy to implement in terms of code; perhaps \"hubs\" could be just like \"groups\" but have this argument tree thing instead of a timeline of posts, and it could have its own tab on the sidebar.<br />Maybe it could work as follows: users join a hub and can see the argument structure, reasons and objections and the sub-reasons and sub-objections for each, and anyone could post a new reason or objection anywhere on the structure, and users could vote on which have the best argument (maybe only factor upvotes into the \"best-ness\" score otherwise there would be spiteful downvoting the other side's arguments to screw up the system). The best arguments could appear most prominently in their \"branch\" of the tree so more people can see and discuss them. Also, maybe allow users to flag duplicate reasons/objections for merging with the chronologically first instance of that idea.<br />I think this will help promote rational debate because anyone could jump into the hub and add their new opinion or refine existing ones. Additionally, this would be a unique feature to Minds, which no other popular social media has, and maybe Minds could gain a reputation for being a great place for online debate (which seems like a major use of social media, and other sites aren't geared towards rational debate).",
"to": [
"https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public"
],
"cc": [
"https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/618490680515239941/followers"
],
"tag": [],
"url": "https://www.minds.com/newsfeed/625900784726319119",
"published": "2016-09-23T03:46:15+00:00",
"source": {
"content": "Minds Feature Idea: Open, Rational Argument Mapping\n\nPerhaps it could be productive to rational debate to implement a feature where there are public debate \"hubs\" and each hub has some controversial topic as its theme and anyone could join that hub and make arguments supporting or opposing whatever topic the hub is about.\nI imagine that the pro and con arguments could be laid out in a hierarchical tree as described in this blog post (not mine) about argument mapping here: https://timvangelder.com/2016/07/16/argument-mapping-with-word-smartart/. It seems that this particular formulation of a structured-argument-organizing-thing would be relatively easy to implement in terms of code; perhaps \"hubs\" could be just like \"groups\" but have this argument tree thing instead of a timeline of posts, and it could have its own tab on the sidebar.\nMaybe it could work as follows: users join a hub and can see the argument structure, reasons and objections and the sub-reasons and sub-objections for each, and anyone could post a new reason or objection anywhere on the structure, and users could vote on which have the best argument (maybe only factor upvotes into the \"best-ness\" score otherwise there would be spiteful downvoting the other side's arguments to screw up the system). The best arguments could appear most prominently in their \"branch\" of the tree so more people can see and discuss them. Also, maybe allow users to flag duplicate reasons/objections for merging with the chronologically first instance of that idea.\nI think this will help promote rational debate because anyone could jump into the hub and add their new opinion or refine existing ones. Additionally, this would be a unique feature to Minds, which no other popular social media has, and maybe Minds could gain a reputation for being a great place for online debate (which seems like a major use of social media, and other sites aren't geared towards rational debate).",
"mediaType": "text/plain"
}
},
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/618490680515239941/entities/urn:activity:625900784726319119/activity"
}
],
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/618490680515239941/outbox",
"partOf": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/618490680515239941/outboxoutbox"
}