A small tool to view real-world ActivityPub objects as JSON! Enter a URL
or username from Mastodon or a similar service below, and we'll send a
request with
the right
Accept
header
to the server to view the underlying object.
{
"@context": "https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams",
"type": "OrderedCollectionPage",
"orderedItems": [
{
"type": "Create",
"actor": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/459616670831353872",
"object": {
"type": "Note",
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/459616670831353872/entities/urn:activity:778292856707096590",
"attributedTo": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/459616670831353872",
"content": "<a href=\"https://www.minds.com/newsfeed/778292856707096590\" target=\"_blank\">https://www.minds.com/newsfeed/778292856707096590</a>",
"to": [
"https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public"
],
"cc": [
"https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/459616670831353872/followers",
"https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/459616670831353872"
],
"tag": [],
"url": "https://www.minds.com/newsfeed/778292856707096590",
"published": "2017-11-17T16:17:56+00:00",
"inReplyTo": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/459616670831353872/entities/urn:activity:778176010167263248",
"source": {
"content": "https://www.minds.com/newsfeed/778292856707096590",
"mediaType": "text/plain"
}
},
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/459616670831353872/entities/urn:activity:778292856707096590/activity"
},
{
"type": "Create",
"actor": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/459616670831353872",
"object": {
"type": "Note",
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/459616670831353872/entities/urn:activity:778176010167263248",
"attributedTo": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/459616670831353872",
"content": "If what we are seeing play out in the media regarding sexual predators preying on female actresses is true, then those women chose to be victims in exchange for fame. These women are supposed to be role models and all they have done is compromise their integrity by remaining silently complicit in the actions of a handful of perverted men in power. There is something to be said about a woman brave enough to risk her comfort for her livelihood, but there is more to be said about a woman brave enough to risk her livelihood for her comfort. I believe that all allegations regarding criminally offensive acts should be made to the proper authorities when they happen, not ten, fifteen years down the road to the media. It becomes increasingly difficult for detectives to conduct a proper criminal investigation of claims as more time passes. Mere days can make it nearly impossible for evidence to be collected to prove or disprove allegations of sexual assault or rape. This is not a failing of the police as much as it is the resilience of the human body. The collection of evidence is essential to a legally enforceable outcome. My issue with allegations made by way of the media is that the media is incapable of providing an unbiased investigation into criminal matters. Additionally, they lack the prosecutorial authority to ensure that crimes committed are tried and punished through due process of law. While I do sympathize with the alleged victims in these instances, I cannot get behind them because I have seen no evidence to support their claims. Neither has a jury. Therefore, without adequate information and evidence, I am unfit to make a well-informed determination regarding a person’s innocence or guilt; and so are you. <br />I am not saying that people like Weinstein didn’t use his position to exploit women, nor am I saying he did. I am, however, saying that the media is not the avenue for justice, legally or socially. The media has no obligation to the victims, the accused, the readers, or even the writers. Their obligation is to their advertisers, their stakeholders, their reputations, and their profit margins. If you think the New York Times, the Washington Post, or any of the other aggregate news organizations on television or in print, are providing these stories out of the kindness of their hearts or because it’s the right thing to do, you’d be wrong. Remember back in June when a CNN producer was caught on camera laughing about how stupid the American public is and boasting about how the Russia-Trump investigation was great for ratings because people just ate it up, despite CNN knowing that there was nothing of substance to report on? Or what about in 2014 when Rolling Stone ran an article that detailed the sexual assault of a female college student by a group of guys at a frat party, which was later proven false, retracted, and ultimately cost Rolling Stone $1.5 million in damages to the University of Virginia? Both outlets intentionally pushed false narratives and misled society at large into drawing inaccurate conclusions based on little to no evidence, and yet both are still fully operational, their credibility still intact. Their objective is to sell the story, not the truth. If the story happens to be true, then all the better for business. These news agencies aren’t our friends, they are our handlers. <br />So, let’s imagine for a moment that ten famous women come forward and claim that each of them, at some point in her career, was sexually assaulted by some bigwig, who we’ll call Mr. Mogul. None of these women go to the police after Mr. Mogul sexually assaulted them. No investigation was carried out by law enforcement, no evidence recovered, no statements given, no reports filed. Now, as we have it, Mr. Mogul is sexually assaulting famous women left and right and at no point do any of these women let on that before they met Mr. Mogul they were whole, but after they left Mr. Mogul they were not. None of the women rang the bell on Mr. Mogul’s carnal crimes. None of them quit their famous roles in Mr. Mogul’s movies. None of them used their famous speeches or lift their famous voices to famously stop Mr. Mogul from sexually assaulting more women. That is infamous. After the first famous woman was sexually assaulted and did nothing, she was directly responsible for the following nine, and the next one for the following eight, and so on. That goes beyond complicity and says more to me about what it means to be famous. It says to me that fame is worth compromising one’s integrity. It says to me that fame is worth being sexually assaulted. It says to me that fame is worth someone else being sexually assaulted. Don’t you think that fame would be worth reporting the crime when it happened to the proper authorities? As we’ve seen, it isn’t.<br />",
"to": [
"https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public"
],
"cc": [
"https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/459616670831353872/followers"
],
"tag": [],
"url": "https://www.minds.com/newsfeed/778176010167263248",
"published": "2017-11-17T08:33:38+00:00",
"source": {
"content": "If what we are seeing play out in the media regarding sexual predators preying on female actresses is true, then those women chose to be victims in exchange for fame. These women are supposed to be role models and all they have done is compromise their integrity by remaining silently complicit in the actions of a handful of perverted men in power. There is something to be said about a woman brave enough to risk her comfort for her livelihood, but there is more to be said about a woman brave enough to risk her livelihood for her comfort. I believe that all allegations regarding criminally offensive acts should be made to the proper authorities when they happen, not ten, fifteen years down the road to the media. It becomes increasingly difficult for detectives to conduct a proper criminal investigation of claims as more time passes. Mere days can make it nearly impossible for evidence to be collected to prove or disprove allegations of sexual assault or rape. This is not a failing of the police as much as it is the resilience of the human body. The collection of evidence is essential to a legally enforceable outcome. My issue with allegations made by way of the media is that the media is incapable of providing an unbiased investigation into criminal matters. Additionally, they lack the prosecutorial authority to ensure that crimes committed are tried and punished through due process of law. While I do sympathize with the alleged victims in these instances, I cannot get behind them because I have seen no evidence to support their claims. Neither has a jury. Therefore, without adequate information and evidence, I am unfit to make a well-informed determination regarding a person’s innocence or guilt; and so are you. \nI am not saying that people like Weinstein didn’t use his position to exploit women, nor am I saying he did. I am, however, saying that the media is not the avenue for justice, legally or socially. The media has no obligation to the victims, the accused, the readers, or even the writers. Their obligation is to their advertisers, their stakeholders, their reputations, and their profit margins. If you think the New York Times, the Washington Post, or any of the other aggregate news organizations on television or in print, are providing these stories out of the kindness of their hearts or because it’s the right thing to do, you’d be wrong. Remember back in June when a CNN producer was caught on camera laughing about how stupid the American public is and boasting about how the Russia-Trump investigation was great for ratings because people just ate it up, despite CNN knowing that there was nothing of substance to report on? Or what about in 2014 when Rolling Stone ran an article that detailed the sexual assault of a female college student by a group of guys at a frat party, which was later proven false, retracted, and ultimately cost Rolling Stone $1.5 million in damages to the University of Virginia? Both outlets intentionally pushed false narratives and misled society at large into drawing inaccurate conclusions based on little to no evidence, and yet both are still fully operational, their credibility still intact. Their objective is to sell the story, not the truth. If the story happens to be true, then all the better for business. These news agencies aren’t our friends, they are our handlers. \nSo, let’s imagine for a moment that ten famous women come forward and claim that each of them, at some point in her career, was sexually assaulted by some bigwig, who we’ll call Mr. Mogul. None of these women go to the police after Mr. Mogul sexually assaulted them. No investigation was carried out by law enforcement, no evidence recovered, no statements given, no reports filed. Now, as we have it, Mr. Mogul is sexually assaulting famous women left and right and at no point do any of these women let on that before they met Mr. Mogul they were whole, but after they left Mr. Mogul they were not. None of the women rang the bell on Mr. Mogul’s carnal crimes. None of them quit their famous roles in Mr. Mogul’s movies. None of them used their famous speeches or lift their famous voices to famously stop Mr. Mogul from sexually assaulting more women. That is infamous. After the first famous woman was sexually assaulted and did nothing, she was directly responsible for the following nine, and the next one for the following eight, and so on. That goes beyond complicity and says more to me about what it means to be famous. It says to me that fame is worth compromising one’s integrity. It says to me that fame is worth being sexually assaulted. It says to me that fame is worth someone else being sexually assaulted. Don’t you think that fame would be worth reporting the crime when it happened to the proper authorities? As we’ve seen, it isn’t.\n",
"mediaType": "text/plain"
}
},
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/459616670831353872/entities/urn:activity:778176010167263248/activity"
}
],
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/459616670831353872/outbox",
"partOf": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/459616670831353872/outboxoutbox"
}