A small tool to view real-world ActivityPub objects as JSON! Enter a URL
or username from Mastodon or a similar service below, and we'll send a
request with
the right
Accept
header
to the server to view the underlying object.
{
"@context": "https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams",
"type": "OrderedCollectionPage",
"orderedItems": [
{
"type": "Create",
"actor": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/459125347577765888",
"object": {
"type": "Note",
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/459125347577765888/entities/urn:activity:1663434706865098767",
"attributedTo": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/459125347577765888",
"content": "Är Sverige på väg mot Diktatur?<br /><br />Riksdagsledamoten Elsa Widding beskriver sin frustration i riksdagsarbetet och hur cancellering av åsikter som avviker ifrån det rådande narrativet nu sker från vänster till höger och i våra mainstreammedier.<br /><br />När blev t.ex. att vilja verka för fred något som anses oacceptabelt i Sverige? <br /><br /><a href=\"https://youtu.be/YWyM9jfMTeU?si=W938Rz8EVeN8MPDN\" target=\"_blank\">https://youtu.be/YWyM9jfMTeU?si=W938Rz8EVeN8MPDN</a>",
"to": [
"https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public"
],
"cc": [
"https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/459125347577765888/followers"
],
"tag": [],
"url": "https://www.minds.com/newsfeed/1663434706865098767",
"published": "2024-07-26T04:55:38+00:00",
"source": {
"content": "Är Sverige på väg mot Diktatur?\n\nRiksdagsledamoten Elsa Widding beskriver sin frustration i riksdagsarbetet och hur cancellering av åsikter som avviker ifrån det rådande narrativet nu sker från vänster till höger och i våra mainstreammedier.\n\nNär blev t.ex. att vilja verka för fred något som anses oacceptabelt i Sverige? \n\nhttps://youtu.be/YWyM9jfMTeU?si=W938Rz8EVeN8MPDN",
"mediaType": "text/plain"
}
},
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/459125347577765888/entities/urn:activity:1663434706865098767/activity"
},
{
"type": "Create",
"actor": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/459125347577765888",
"object": {
"type": "Note",
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/459125347577765888/entities/urn:activity:1663018300478590983",
"attributedTo": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/459125347577765888",
"content": "<a href=\"https://youtu.be/58FFEsFGS-0?feature=shared\" target=\"_blank\">https://youtu.be/58FFEsFGS-0?feature=shared</a>",
"to": [
"https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public"
],
"cc": [
"https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/459125347577765888/followers"
],
"tag": [],
"url": "https://www.minds.com/newsfeed/1663018300478590983",
"published": "2024-07-25T01:20:59+00:00",
"source": {
"content": "https://youtu.be/58FFEsFGS-0?feature=shared",
"mediaType": "text/plain"
}
},
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/459125347577765888/entities/urn:activity:1663018300478590983/activity"
},
{
"type": "Create",
"actor": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/459125347577765888",
"object": {
"type": "Note",
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/459125347577765888/entities/urn:activity:1660424756995821573",
"attributedTo": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/459125347577765888",
"content": "Von der Leyen loses court case in blow to her 2nd-term bid<br />European Commission president criticized in vaccine transparency judgment a day before she faces crucial vote on her future.<br /><br /><a href=\"https://www.politico.eu/article/eus-top-court-rules-against-european-commission-in-vaccine-contracts-transparency-case/\" target=\"_blank\">https://www.politico.eu/article/eus-top-court-rules-against-european-commission-in-vaccine-contracts-transparency-case/</a><br /><br />Ursula von der Leyen needs to secure the support of 361 MEPs to be reconfirmed head of the EU Commission. | Dimitar Dilkoff/AFP via Getty Images<br />By Claudia Chiappa<br /><br />Ursula von der Leyen’s bid for a second term as European Commission chief has been dealt a major blow after a top EU court ruled she was not transparent enough with the public about Covid-19 vaccine contracts.<br /><br />The General Court of the European Union ruled against the Commission’s decision to redact large parts of the contracts before making them available.<br /><br />The ruling came just over 24 hours before von der Leyen’s political future will be decided by members of the European Parliament. She needs 361 of the 720 EU lawmakers to back her in a secret vote that is expected to be close.<br /><br />“She needs to make concessions on this for our vote,” one delegate within Renew Europe, granted anonymity to speak candidly, told POLITICO, adding: “It is important that von der Leyen shows that she can herself gauge the seriousness and the appropriate remedy.”<br /><br />One of the groups that von der Leyen has been seeking support from is the Greens, members of which brought this vaccine court case.<br /><br />They filed requests to access the vaccine contracts and certain related documents to understand the agreement between the Commission and Covid-19 vaccine manufacturers in 2021.<br /><br />The Commission only agreed to give partial access to certain contracts, arguing that some sections had been redacted to protect commercial interests or for privacy matters. The Green MEPs then took the Commission to court over the refusal. <br /><br />The General Court on Wednesday partially upheld the MEPs’ lawsuit and annulled the Commission’s decision to redact parts of the contracts. <br /><br />It pushed against the Commission’s decision to conceal provisions on indemnification, arguing that the Commission failed to prove how those clauses would undermine the commercial interests of the pharmaceutical companies.<br /><br />The Commission had also refused to disclose personal details of the officials who negotiated the purchase of the vaccines over privacy concerns. But the court found that the MEPs demonstrated the “public interest” in identifying that team, in order to ascertain if they had any conflicts of interest. <br /><br />Tilly Metz, one of the Green MEPs who filed the lawsuit, said the ruling is “significant for the future” as the Commission is expected to perform more joint procurements — in health, but potentially also in defense. <br /><br />“It is important that the court has confirmed the importance of proper justifications for protecting commercial interests,” she said in a statement. <br /><br />“The new European Commission must now adapt their handling of access to documents requests to be in line with today’s ruling,” she added.<br /><br />Peter Liese, an MEP from the European People’s Party (the same political group as von der Leyen), played down the court ruling. He considers it “justifiable” that the Commission agreed to some of the pharmaceutical companies’ demands — including redacting certain clauses — to ensure quick access to vaccines for Europe. <br /><br />“It is good that the Commission’s lawyers now analyze the judgment in detail and draw conclusions from it, but the conclusion that the Commission got everything wrong can already be disproved at first glance at the judgment,” he added.<br /><br />The Commission pointed out how the court agreed that certain clauses of the contracts were covered by protection of commercial interest, thus only partially upholding the claims in the lawsuit.<br /><br />“In these cases, the Commission needed to strike a difficult balance between the right of the public, including MEPs, to information, and the legal requirements emanating from the COVID-19 contracts themselves, which could result in claims for damages at the cost of taxpayers’ money,” the Commission said in a statement.<br /><br />The executive continued that it will “carefully study the Court’s judgments and their implications” and that it “reserves its legal options.” <br /><br />The Commission can appeal the ruling within two months and 10 days of the decision.<br />Other cases regarding the Pfizer contracts and communication between von der Leyen and Pfizer CEO Albert Bourla are also pending in different EU jurisdictions.<br /><br />Max Griera Andreu contributed to this developing story.",
"to": [
"https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public"
],
"cc": [
"https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/459125347577765888/followers"
],
"tag": [],
"url": "https://www.minds.com/newsfeed/1660424756995821573",
"published": "2024-07-17T21:35:10+00:00",
"attachment": [
{
"type": "Document",
"url": "https://cdn.minds.com/fs/v1/thumbnail/1660424162029604870/xlarge/",
"mediaType": "image/jpeg",
"height": 866,
"width": 1280
}
],
"source": {
"content": "Von der Leyen loses court case in blow to her 2nd-term bid\nEuropean Commission president criticized in vaccine transparency judgment a day before she faces crucial vote on her future.\n\nhttps://www.politico.eu/article/eus-top-court-rules-against-european-commission-in-vaccine-contracts-transparency-case/\n\nUrsula von der Leyen needs to secure the support of 361 MEPs to be reconfirmed head of the EU Commission. | Dimitar Dilkoff/AFP via Getty Images\nBy Claudia Chiappa\n\nUrsula von der Leyen’s bid for a second term as European Commission chief has been dealt a major blow after a top EU court ruled she was not transparent enough with the public about Covid-19 vaccine contracts.\n\nThe General Court of the European Union ruled against the Commission’s decision to redact large parts of the contracts before making them available.\n\nThe ruling came just over 24 hours before von der Leyen’s political future will be decided by members of the European Parliament. She needs 361 of the 720 EU lawmakers to back her in a secret vote that is expected to be close.\n\n“She needs to make concessions on this for our vote,” one delegate within Renew Europe, granted anonymity to speak candidly, told POLITICO, adding: “It is important that von der Leyen shows that she can herself gauge the seriousness and the appropriate remedy.”\n\nOne of the groups that von der Leyen has been seeking support from is the Greens, members of which brought this vaccine court case.\n\nThey filed requests to access the vaccine contracts and certain related documents to understand the agreement between the Commission and Covid-19 vaccine manufacturers in 2021.\n\nThe Commission only agreed to give partial access to certain contracts, arguing that some sections had been redacted to protect commercial interests or for privacy matters. The Green MEPs then took the Commission to court over the refusal. \n\nThe General Court on Wednesday partially upheld the MEPs’ lawsuit and annulled the Commission’s decision to redact parts of the contracts. \n\nIt pushed against the Commission’s decision to conceal provisions on indemnification, arguing that the Commission failed to prove how those clauses would undermine the commercial interests of the pharmaceutical companies.\n\nThe Commission had also refused to disclose personal details of the officials who negotiated the purchase of the vaccines over privacy concerns. But the court found that the MEPs demonstrated the “public interest” in identifying that team, in order to ascertain if they had any conflicts of interest. \n\nTilly Metz, one of the Green MEPs who filed the lawsuit, said the ruling is “significant for the future” as the Commission is expected to perform more joint procurements — in health, but potentially also in defense. \n\n“It is important that the court has confirmed the importance of proper justifications for protecting commercial interests,” she said in a statement. \n\n“The new European Commission must now adapt their handling of access to documents requests to be in line with today’s ruling,” she added.\n\nPeter Liese, an MEP from the European People’s Party (the same political group as von der Leyen), played down the court ruling. He considers it “justifiable” that the Commission agreed to some of the pharmaceutical companies’ demands — including redacting certain clauses — to ensure quick access to vaccines for Europe. \n\n“It is good that the Commission’s lawyers now analyze the judgment in detail and draw conclusions from it, but the conclusion that the Commission got everything wrong can already be disproved at first glance at the judgment,” he added.\n\nThe Commission pointed out how the court agreed that certain clauses of the contracts were covered by protection of commercial interest, thus only partially upholding the claims in the lawsuit.\n\n“In these cases, the Commission needed to strike a difficult balance between the right of the public, including MEPs, to information, and the legal requirements emanating from the COVID-19 contracts themselves, which could result in claims for damages at the cost of taxpayers’ money,” the Commission said in a statement.\n\nThe executive continued that it will “carefully study the Court’s judgments and their implications” and that it “reserves its legal options.” \n\nThe Commission can appeal the ruling within two months and 10 days of the decision.\nOther cases regarding the Pfizer contracts and communication between von der Leyen and Pfizer CEO Albert Bourla are also pending in different EU jurisdictions.\n\nMax Griera Andreu contributed to this developing story.",
"mediaType": "text/plain"
}
},
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/459125347577765888/entities/urn:activity:1660424756995821573/activity"
},
{
"type": "Create",
"actor": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/459125347577765888",
"object": {
"type": "Note",
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/459125347577765888/entities/urn:activity:1651914493195718657",
"attributedTo": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/459125347577765888",
"content": "Oroliga extremister i Norden fruktar att dras med i USA:s terrorstämpel<br />Publicerad 17 juni<br /><a href=\"https://www.etc.se/kommentar/oroliga-extremister-fruktar-att-dras-med-i-usa-s-terrorstaempel\" target=\"_blank\">https://www.etc.se/kommentar/oroliga-extremister-fruktar-att-dras-med-i-usa-s-terrorstaempel</a><br /><br />Den 14 juni terroristklassade USA den största uttalat nazistiska organisationen i Sverige, Nordiska motståndsrörelsen (NMR). Även tre av ledarna i NMR – Fredrik Vejdeland, Pär Öberg och Robert Eklund – namngavs av USA:s utrikesdepartement som globala terrorister.<br /><br />Terrorklassningen innebär sanktioner för Nordiska motståndsrörelsen och de tre ledarna. De kommer inte kunna göra ekonomiska transaktioner med amerikanska medborgare och företag eller inneha egendom i USA. Den första märkbara effekten kommer bli att flera nätplattformar kommer avsluta alla tjänster NMR använder sig av. En mer långtgående effekt blir att NMR nu kommer att behandlas som internationell hotaktör i underrättelsesammanhang, vilket kommer att skärpa bland annat säkerhetstjänstens behandling av dem även i Sverige.<br /><br />Sprängde bomber i Göteborg<br /><br />Det är inte första gången USA terrorklassar medlemmar ur Nordiska motståndsrörelsen. Hösten 2020 förde USA upp den paramilitära organisationen Ryska imperiella rörelsen på sin terrorlista. De lade då även till svenska högerextremisten Anton Thulin från NMR, som tränats i vapenhantering av den ryska rörelsen i Sankt Petersburg. Thulin ingick i den krets från Nordiska motståndsrörelsen som dömdes för att ha sprängt bomber i Göteborg mot flyktingboenden och bokhandeln Syndikalistiskt forum. Efter avtjänat straff reste Thulin till Ryssland.<br /><br />Ryska imperiella rörelsen har spelat en roll i att värva internationella frivilliga högerextremister till den ryska invasionen av Ukraina. Rörelsen har under lång tid samarbetat med Nordiska motståndsrörelsen. Enligt tidskriften Expo var det detta samarbete som fick det amerikanska utrikesdepartementet att påbörja utredningen att även terrorklassa NMR.<br /><br />Uppstod ur Sverigedemokraterna<br /><br />Nordiska motståndsrörelsen växte fram ur gruppen Oberoende nationell ungdom, en ungdomsgrupp som bildades 1995 inom Sverigedemokraterna Stockholm. Två år senare ombildades de till Nationell ungdom och startade sin ”vuxenorganisation” Svenska motståndsrörelsen, som senare bytte namn till Nordiska motståndsrörelsen när den expanderade till hela Norden. <br /><br />Organisationen har under hela sin historia gjort sig kända för en grov våldsutövning. Historien har varit kantad av vapengömmor, knivdåd och attacker mot vänstermöten. Det var medlemmar med bakgrund i motståndsrörelsen som 1999 sköt den syndikalistiska fackföreningsmedlemmen Björn Söderberg till döds. En av organisationens medlemmar är fortfarande efterlyst i sin frånvaro efter mordet på Joakim Karlsson i Vallentuna 2012. <br /><br />Efter attacken mot en lokal antirasistisk demonstration i Kärrtorp i december 2013 dömdes flera ledande företrädare till fängelse. Och så det kändaste fallet: Theodor Engström som dömdes för mordet under Almedalen på psykiatrisamordnare Ing-Marie Wieselgren och för förberedelse till terrorbrott mot Annie Lööf (C) var tidigare medlem i Nordiska motståndsrörelsen. Professor Christer Mattsson vid Segerstedtinstitutet i Göteborg har kallat Nordiska motståndsrörelsen för en extremistfabrik.<br /><br />Avhoppare: Skaffat automatvapen <br /><br />Samma våldsamma utveckling genomgick Nordiska motståndsrörelsens systerorganisationer i de nordiska grannländerna. Efter mordet på antirasisten Jimi Karttunen september 2016 inleddes en rättslig process som slutade med att finska avdelningen av NMR kriminaliserades och upplöstes 2020. <br /><br />De anonyma attackerna har inriktats mot RFSL-kontor, vänsterlokaler och tidningsredaktioner.<br />NMR har därefter varit försiktigare och försökt att hålla de illegala aktionerna formellt skilda från organisationen, för att undvika att drabbas av repression och förbud. Våldsamma attacker utförs av ”sympatisörer” och ”autonoma nationalister” nära organisationen och redovisas i aktionsrapporter på deras hemsida. De anonyma attackerna har inriktats mot RFSL-kontor, vänsterlokaler och tidningsredaktioner.<br /><br />Det mesta av våldet har dock fortsatt ske i organisationens namn, öppet i form av konfrontationer på stan under torgmöten, vanligtvis med förbipasserande lokalbor. Eller i form av motdemonstrationer, som i våras när NMR attackerade Socialdemokraternas förstamaj-firande i Gislaved.<br /><br />Dagens Nyheters Niklas Orrenius intervjuade i februari 2022 avhopparen Jimmy Thunlind om den våg av attacker som Nordiska motståndsrörelsen genomfört mot Judiska församlingen i Norrköping. Thunlind avslöjade då att organisationen våren 2020, precis när coronapandemin bröt ut, hade förberett sig för att trappa upp våldsnivån mot vänstern, de hade illegalt införskaffat automatvapen och sprängmedel. Organisationen hade enligt Thunlind långtgående planer på att skottskada antifascister. Men med ökad militans ökade också påfrestningen på medlemmarna. Flera hoppade av och en äldre falang bröt sig ur.<br /><br />Syftet är att trakassera<br /><br />Istället grundande NMR sajten Avmaskerat, ett fristående projekt för att kartlägga och hänga ut vänsteraktiva. Terrorn lades på en mer lågintensiv nivå, med organiserade trakasserikampanjer riktade mot personer. Våldet övergick i falska orosanmälningar till socialtjänsten, brev till arbetsgivare och grannar. Alternativa vänsterlokaler utsattes för falska anmälningskampanjer till brandkåren för bristande brandsäkerhet och polisen för alkoholförsäljning. Utåt sett är Avmaskerad oberoende från Nordiska motståndsrörelsen, men informellt drivs den av medlemmar i NMR. Kartläggningsmaterial beställs ut till NMR:s tidning Nordfront, som har utgivarbevis, men läggs sedan på Avmaskerat för att slippa åtal och anmälningar.<br /><br />Uthängningssidan har för sina kampanjer fått flera anmälningar mot sig, men utan att polisen gått vidare med utredningarna. Däremot har det tvingat Avmaskerat att vid upprepade tillfällen byta webbleverantör. Flera företag har vägrat husera sajten på sin plattform på grund av de integritetskränkande publiceringarna, vilket gjort att sajten att under långa perioder legat nere och varit omöjlig att nå. <br /><br />I maj anlitade NMR en amerikansk leverantör för att öppna sidan igen. Det var detta försök att flytta över verksamheten till USA som återaktualiserade de amerikanska myndigheternas utredning av att terrorklassa NMR. Samma dag som terrorklassningen gick igenom togs Avmaskerat ner igen.<br /><br />Vill byta ansvarig utgivare<br /><br />Nu sprider sig oron bland Avmaskerats samarbetspartners att dras med av terrorstämpeln. Avmaskerats kartläggningar har gjorts med stöd av den högerextrema alternativmedieprofilen Christian Peterson, som även driver Förtalsombudsmannen. Peterson, som själv har en bakgrund i NMR, håller i det omfattande kartläggningsarkiv som samlar stora delar av extremhögerns material. Han har nu i juni skickat in en ansökan om att få byta ansvarig utgivare på databasen, för att själv komma undan rättsprocesser.<br /><br />Nu kvarstår Ryssland som det enda land dit de kan söka sig för att upprätthålla sin verksamhet.<br />Det var kontakterna med ryska extremhögern som öppnade för terrorklassificeringen av Nordiska motståndsrörelsen. Nu när USA stänger dörrarna för NMR hos nätleverantörer och banker, kvarstår Ryssland som det enda land dit de kan söka sig för att upprätthålla sin verksamhet.",
"to": [
"https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public"
],
"cc": [
"https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/459125347577765888/followers"
],
"tag": [],
"url": "https://www.minds.com/newsfeed/1651914493195718657",
"published": "2024-06-24T09:58:25+00:00",
"source": {
"content": "Oroliga extremister i Norden fruktar att dras med i USA:s terrorstämpel\nPublicerad 17 juni\nhttps://www.etc.se/kommentar/oroliga-extremister-fruktar-att-dras-med-i-usa-s-terrorstaempel\n\nDen 14 juni terroristklassade USA den största uttalat nazistiska organisationen i Sverige, Nordiska motståndsrörelsen (NMR). Även tre av ledarna i NMR – Fredrik Vejdeland, Pär Öberg och Robert Eklund – namngavs av USA:s utrikesdepartement som globala terrorister.\n\nTerrorklassningen innebär sanktioner för Nordiska motståndsrörelsen och de tre ledarna. De kommer inte kunna göra ekonomiska transaktioner med amerikanska medborgare och företag eller inneha egendom i USA. Den första märkbara effekten kommer bli att flera nätplattformar kommer avsluta alla tjänster NMR använder sig av. En mer långtgående effekt blir att NMR nu kommer att behandlas som internationell hotaktör i underrättelsesammanhang, vilket kommer att skärpa bland annat säkerhetstjänstens behandling av dem även i Sverige.\n\nSprängde bomber i Göteborg\n\nDet är inte första gången USA terrorklassar medlemmar ur Nordiska motståndsrörelsen. Hösten 2020 förde USA upp den paramilitära organisationen Ryska imperiella rörelsen på sin terrorlista. De lade då även till svenska högerextremisten Anton Thulin från NMR, som tränats i vapenhantering av den ryska rörelsen i Sankt Petersburg. Thulin ingick i den krets från Nordiska motståndsrörelsen som dömdes för att ha sprängt bomber i Göteborg mot flyktingboenden och bokhandeln Syndikalistiskt forum. Efter avtjänat straff reste Thulin till Ryssland.\n\nRyska imperiella rörelsen har spelat en roll i att värva internationella frivilliga högerextremister till den ryska invasionen av Ukraina. Rörelsen har under lång tid samarbetat med Nordiska motståndsrörelsen. Enligt tidskriften Expo var det detta samarbete som fick det amerikanska utrikesdepartementet att påbörja utredningen att även terrorklassa NMR.\n\nUppstod ur Sverigedemokraterna\n\nNordiska motståndsrörelsen växte fram ur gruppen Oberoende nationell ungdom, en ungdomsgrupp som bildades 1995 inom Sverigedemokraterna Stockholm. Två år senare ombildades de till Nationell ungdom och startade sin ”vuxenorganisation” Svenska motståndsrörelsen, som senare bytte namn till Nordiska motståndsrörelsen när den expanderade till hela Norden. \n\nOrganisationen har under hela sin historia gjort sig kända för en grov våldsutövning. Historien har varit kantad av vapengömmor, knivdåd och attacker mot vänstermöten. Det var medlemmar med bakgrund i motståndsrörelsen som 1999 sköt den syndikalistiska fackföreningsmedlemmen Björn Söderberg till döds. En av organisationens medlemmar är fortfarande efterlyst i sin frånvaro efter mordet på Joakim Karlsson i Vallentuna 2012. \n\nEfter attacken mot en lokal antirasistisk demonstration i Kärrtorp i december 2013 dömdes flera ledande företrädare till fängelse. Och så det kändaste fallet: Theodor Engström som dömdes för mordet under Almedalen på psykiatrisamordnare Ing-Marie Wieselgren och för förberedelse till terrorbrott mot Annie Lööf (C) var tidigare medlem i Nordiska motståndsrörelsen. Professor Christer Mattsson vid Segerstedtinstitutet i Göteborg har kallat Nordiska motståndsrörelsen för en extremistfabrik.\n\nAvhoppare: Skaffat automatvapen \n\nSamma våldsamma utveckling genomgick Nordiska motståndsrörelsens systerorganisationer i de nordiska grannländerna. Efter mordet på antirasisten Jimi Karttunen september 2016 inleddes en rättslig process som slutade med att finska avdelningen av NMR kriminaliserades och upplöstes 2020. \n\nDe anonyma attackerna har inriktats mot RFSL-kontor, vänsterlokaler och tidningsredaktioner.\nNMR har därefter varit försiktigare och försökt att hålla de illegala aktionerna formellt skilda från organisationen, för att undvika att drabbas av repression och förbud. Våldsamma attacker utförs av ”sympatisörer” och ”autonoma nationalister” nära organisationen och redovisas i aktionsrapporter på deras hemsida. De anonyma attackerna har inriktats mot RFSL-kontor, vänsterlokaler och tidningsredaktioner.\n\nDet mesta av våldet har dock fortsatt ske i organisationens namn, öppet i form av konfrontationer på stan under torgmöten, vanligtvis med förbipasserande lokalbor. Eller i form av motdemonstrationer, som i våras när NMR attackerade Socialdemokraternas förstamaj-firande i Gislaved.\n\nDagens Nyheters Niklas Orrenius intervjuade i februari 2022 avhopparen Jimmy Thunlind om den våg av attacker som Nordiska motståndsrörelsen genomfört mot Judiska församlingen i Norrköping. Thunlind avslöjade då att organisationen våren 2020, precis när coronapandemin bröt ut, hade förberett sig för att trappa upp våldsnivån mot vänstern, de hade illegalt införskaffat automatvapen och sprängmedel. Organisationen hade enligt Thunlind långtgående planer på att skottskada antifascister. Men med ökad militans ökade också påfrestningen på medlemmarna. Flera hoppade av och en äldre falang bröt sig ur.\n\nSyftet är att trakassera\n\nIstället grundande NMR sajten Avmaskerat, ett fristående projekt för att kartlägga och hänga ut vänsteraktiva. Terrorn lades på en mer lågintensiv nivå, med organiserade trakasserikampanjer riktade mot personer. Våldet övergick i falska orosanmälningar till socialtjänsten, brev till arbetsgivare och grannar. Alternativa vänsterlokaler utsattes för falska anmälningskampanjer till brandkåren för bristande brandsäkerhet och polisen för alkoholförsäljning. Utåt sett är Avmaskerad oberoende från Nordiska motståndsrörelsen, men informellt drivs den av medlemmar i NMR. Kartläggningsmaterial beställs ut till NMR:s tidning Nordfront, som har utgivarbevis, men läggs sedan på Avmaskerat för att slippa åtal och anmälningar.\n\nUthängningssidan har för sina kampanjer fått flera anmälningar mot sig, men utan att polisen gått vidare med utredningarna. Däremot har det tvingat Avmaskerat att vid upprepade tillfällen byta webbleverantör. Flera företag har vägrat husera sajten på sin plattform på grund av de integritetskränkande publiceringarna, vilket gjort att sajten att under långa perioder legat nere och varit omöjlig att nå. \n\nI maj anlitade NMR en amerikansk leverantör för att öppna sidan igen. Det var detta försök att flytta över verksamheten till USA som återaktualiserade de amerikanska myndigheternas utredning av att terrorklassa NMR. Samma dag som terrorklassningen gick igenom togs Avmaskerat ner igen.\n\nVill byta ansvarig utgivare\n\nNu sprider sig oron bland Avmaskerats samarbetspartners att dras med av terrorstämpeln. Avmaskerats kartläggningar har gjorts med stöd av den högerextrema alternativmedieprofilen Christian Peterson, som även driver Förtalsombudsmannen. Peterson, som själv har en bakgrund i NMR, håller i det omfattande kartläggningsarkiv som samlar stora delar av extremhögerns material. Han har nu i juni skickat in en ansökan om att få byta ansvarig utgivare på databasen, för att själv komma undan rättsprocesser.\n\nNu kvarstår Ryssland som det enda land dit de kan söka sig för att upprätthålla sin verksamhet.\nDet var kontakterna med ryska extremhögern som öppnade för terrorklassificeringen av Nordiska motståndsrörelsen. Nu när USA stänger dörrarna för NMR hos nätleverantörer och banker, kvarstår Ryssland som det enda land dit de kan söka sig för att upprätthålla sin verksamhet.",
"mediaType": "text/plain"
}
},
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/459125347577765888/entities/urn:activity:1651914493195718657/activity"
},
{
"type": "Create",
"actor": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/459125347577765888",
"object": {
"type": "Note",
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/459125347577765888/entities/urn:activity:1627766914342195202",
"attributedTo": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/459125347577765888",
"content": "”Först av allt, gör ingen skada”<br />Diskutera gärna med några vänner, arbetskollegor eller grannar det faktum att så otroligt många kändisar drabbats av konstigheter, samtidigt som de ändå bara utgör toppen på ett gigantiskt isberg. <br /><br />Hur kan något som redan orsakat så oerhört mycket skada, fortfarande finnas i distribution? T.o.m. till gravida. I Sverige?! 🇸🇪 <a href=\"https://www.minds.com/newsfeed/1627766914342195202\" target=\"_blank\">https://www.minds.com/newsfeed/1627766914342195202</a>",
"to": [
"https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public"
],
"cc": [
"https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/459125347577765888/followers"
],
"tag": [],
"url": "https://www.minds.com/newsfeed/1627766914342195202",
"published": "2024-04-18T18:44:34+00:00",
"source": {
"content": "”Först av allt, gör ingen skada”\nDiskutera gärna med några vänner, arbetskollegor eller grannar det faktum att så otroligt många kändisar drabbats av konstigheter, samtidigt som de ändå bara utgör toppen på ett gigantiskt isberg. \n\nHur kan något som redan orsakat så oerhört mycket skada, fortfarande finnas i distribution? T.o.m. till gravida. I Sverige?! 🇸🇪 https://www.minds.com/newsfeed/1627766914342195202",
"mediaType": "text/plain"
}
},
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/459125347577765888/entities/urn:activity:1627766914342195202/activity"
},
{
"type": "Create",
"actor": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/459125347577765888",
"object": {
"type": "Note",
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/459125347577765888/entities/urn:activity:1581433703672844305",
"attributedTo": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/459125347577765888",
"content": "Här kan man posta gruppinlägg! 😊😎",
"to": [
"https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public"
],
"cc": [
"https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/459125347577765888/followers"
],
"tag": [],
"url": "https://www.minds.com/newsfeed/1581433703672844305",
"published": "2023-12-12T22:12:56+00:00",
"source": {
"content": "Här kan man posta gruppinlägg! 😊😎",
"mediaType": "text/plain"
}
},
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/459125347577765888/entities/urn:activity:1581433703672844305/activity"
},
{
"type": "Create",
"actor": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/459125347577765888",
"object": {
"type": "Note",
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/459125347577765888/entities/urn:activity:1573502669769674760",
"attributedTo": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/459125347577765888",
"content": "Sannolik kontaminering i Pfizers c19-vaccin<br />Se hela klippet på några minuter. Sen avråd/avboka eventuella nära & kära som fortfarande lever i tron om att de gör eller gjort någonting bra.<br /><br />Dela givetvis vidare i sociala medier men kanske ännu hellre med ord till de du bryr dig om. Ok? <a href=\"https://www.minds.com/newsfeed/1573502669769674760\" target=\"_blank\">https://www.minds.com/newsfeed/1573502669769674760</a>",
"to": [
"https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public"
],
"cc": [
"https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/459125347577765888/followers"
],
"tag": [],
"url": "https://www.minds.com/newsfeed/1573502669769674760",
"published": "2023-11-21T00:57:50+00:00",
"source": {
"content": "Sannolik kontaminering i Pfizers c19-vaccin\nSe hela klippet på några minuter. Sen avråd/avboka eventuella nära & kära som fortfarande lever i tron om att de gör eller gjort någonting bra.\n\nDela givetvis vidare i sociala medier men kanske ännu hellre med ord till de du bryr dig om. Ok? https://www.minds.com/newsfeed/1573502669769674760",
"mediaType": "text/plain"
}
},
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/459125347577765888/entities/urn:activity:1573502669769674760/activity"
},
{
"type": "Create",
"actor": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/459125347577765888",
"object": {
"type": "Note",
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/459125347577765888/entities/urn:activity:1569956760171581453",
"attributedTo": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/459125347577765888",
"content": "The real Covid jab scandal is finally emerging<br />The young and healthy, who were at minimal risk from Covid, should not have been told they had to take the vaccine<br /><br /><a href=\"https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2023/11/09/the-real-covid-jab-scandal-is-finally-emerging/\" target=\"_blank\">https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2023/11/09/the-real-covid-jab-scandal-is-finally-emerging/</a><br /><br />Allison Pearson<br />9 November 2023 • 7:33pm<br /><br />I am not an anti-vaxxer but… On 29 April 2021, Lisa Shaw, a clever, sensible, creative, mischievous, award-winning presenter at BBC Radio Newcastle, had her first Covid vaccination. Like millions of us, Lisa was delighted and relieved to get her jab. Not only did the 44-year-old mother of one feel she was doing her bit to keep her community safe (Lisa had been astonished a few weeks earlier when a girlfriend had said she wasn’t getting jabbed), she was excited “to give her mam a hug”.<br /><br />A few days later, Lisa developed a headache and stabbing pains behind her eyes which wouldn’t go away. By May 16, she was taken by ambulance to University Hospital of North Durham. Tests revealed blood clots in Lisa’s brain and she was moved to a specialist neurology unit in Newcastle. By now, she had difficulty speaking. Scans showed she had suffered a haemorrhage in the brain and part of her skull was removed to try and relieve the pressure. Her husband Gareth Eve remained by his wife’s bedside, but Lisa told him to go home because she was worried about Zachary, their six-year-old. One final kiss. The last time Gareth heard her voice. Lisa Shaw died on May 21 from complications arising from the AstraZeneca Covid vaccination.<br /><br />The coroner said: “Ms Shaw was previously fit and well” but it was “clearly established” that her death was due to a very rare “vaccine-induced thrombotic thrombocytopenia (VITT)”, a new condition which leads to swelling and bleeding of the brain.<br /><br />Strenuous efforts had been made to put the public’s mind at rest when the jab was approved. The Oxford/AstraZeneca vaccine was “a great British success story”, according to the then health secretary Matt Hancock; self-obsessed numpty that he is, Hancock was particularly chuffed the jab had been invented by someone who went to his Oxford college. “It is truly fantastic news – and a triumph for British science – that the <a class=\"u-url mention\" href=\"https://www.minds.com/UniofOxford\" target=\"_blank\">@UniofOxford</a>/@AstraZeneca vaccine has been approved for use,” tweeted a triumphant prime minister Boris Johnson.<br /><br />At a dark time, the AZ jab brought a blazing ray of hope with the added patriotic, Brexit bonus that the UK was able to steal a march on our European neighbours. After Lisa Shaw died, we were told that the clots are “considered extremely rare,” there had only been 417 reported cases and 72 deaths after 24.8 million first doses and 23.9 million second doses of the AstraZeneca vaccine in the UK. It also saved a great many lives. But expressing reservations about possible side-effects was seen as party-pooping. It meant you ran the risk of being labelled as that most reviled and irresponsible being, an “anti-vaxxer”.<br /><br />“I had lost my wife and my son had lost his mam, but for an awfully long time people like us weren’t able to tell our story because we were put in the box of crackpots and conspiracy theorists,” Gareth Eve told me yesterday. After Lisa died, Gareth says he had phone conversations with several leading broadcasters. “They would express sympathy, but then they were very nervous, they’d say they have to be very careful, you know, how they report the story without breaching broadcasting guidelines by implying there was any problem with the jab.”<br /><br />One beautiful vibrant woman, “loved by everyone whose lives she touched”, was gone. (“I wish it had been me instead of her,” Gareth says, “I do my best as a single dad with Zach, but I’m never going to be Lisa, she was so tactile and loving.”) The fact Lisa Shaw had died after receiving the AZ jab was nothing to worry about, though, in the grand scheme of things, was it?<br /><br />Well, yes, actually it was. The public – and in particular fit younger people like Lisa – have every right to feel aggrieved. <br /><br />As this newspaper reported yesterday, the Oxford-AstraZeneca Covid-19 vaccine has been branded “defective” in a multi-million pound landmark legal action which will suggest that claims over its efficacy were “vastly overstated”. The pharmaceutical giant is being sued in a test case by Jamie Scott, a father-of-two who suffered a significant permanent brain injury, and by the widower and two young children of 35-year-old Alpa Tailor. Both damages claims relate to VITT, the condition that killed Lisa Shaw. AstraZeneca says that the vaccine “has continuously been shown to have an acceptable safety profile” and that “regulators around the world consistently state that the benefits of vaccination outweigh the risks of extremely rare potential side-effects.”<br /><br />In the months after her death, Gareth, who was “dealing with grief while you’re trying to parent” didn’t have the emotional energy for a legal battle. “I was in the Coroner’s Court in Newcastle when the coroner said there is no doubt Lisa died because of the AstraZeneca jab and the pathologist said the same and the doctor told Lisa while she was still conscious that the Covid jab had done this to her. It’s like they don’t want there to be any written record that they admitted guilt.” <br /><br />I must admit there is a strong sense of, “There but for the grace of God go I” when I hear Gareth talking about his wife. I also had the AstraZeneca jab (twice) because, like Lisa, I wanted to reassure my elderly mother and hug her after over a year apart.<br /><br />We were all given the impression that the jab could prevent both infection and transmission (why else would they make it mandatory for care home workers?) It sounded brilliant. But the legal claim states, “the absolute risk reduction concerning Covid-19 prevention was only 1.2 per cent”.<br /><br />“Lisa thought getting the jab was the right thing to do as everybody did,” Gareth recalls, “The Government kept saying it was safe and effective. We didn’t know there were other countries that were withdrawing the AstraZeneca.”<br /><br />Ah, yes, “safe and effective”. How many times did we hear Cabinet ministers intone that reassuring mantra? Yet, use of the word “safe” by any pharmaceutical company advertising a product had been banned for years for exactly that reason – it is misleadingly reassuring. (The Government seems to think the rules didn’t prevent it saying “safe and effective” because it wasn’t advertising a specific product: a Mandy Rice Davis if ever I heard one.)<br /><br />Where, you might well ask, was the MHRA (Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency)? Ben Kingsley, a lawyer and co-author of a brilliant and damning new book, The Accountability Deficit, says: “For good reason, the MHRA’s rules did not allow AstraZeneca to promote its vaccine as ‘safe’. Yet, astonishingly, while a raft of other countries were pulling the AZ jab for safety reasons the British regulator stood aside with tragic consequences for Lisa and her family while ministers and the NHS continued to insist that it remained unequivocally safe and effective.”<br /><br />It is almost too painful to consider that, 15 days before Lisa Shaw went eagerly to get her Covid jab so she could “hug my mam”, Denmark stopped the use of AstraZeneca in its vaccination rollout after reports of rare but serious cases of blood clots. Finland also announced that it would continue to limit the AstraZeneca vaccine to people aged 65 and over following similar health concerns. Was the MHRA unaware of growing international doubts (AZ was never licensed in the US) or was it, perhaps, rather reluctant to tarnish a great British success story?<br /><br />In ethical terms, for a vaccine to be rolled out to people who are not at significant risk from Covid, it would need to be shown to be very safe indeed for those groups. I also clearly remember the head of the Government’s Vaccine Taskforce, Kate Bingham, saying that vaccinating everyone in the country was “not going to happen”. “It’s an adult-only vaccine, for people over 50, focusing on health workers and care home workers and the vulnerable,” she said. Vaccination policy would be aimed at those “most at risk”. She noted that vaccinating healthy people, who are much less likely to have severe outcomes from Covid-19, “could cause them some freak harm”, potentially tipping the scales in terms of the risk-benefit analysis.<br /><br />With a heavy heart I’m going to say what should have been said a long time ago. Unlike those who were actually vulnerable to Covid, Lisa Shaw did not need a Covid vaccine; any minuscule benefit to her was outweighed by the small risk. Neither did I (I’d had the virus in January 2020 as plentiful antibodies later attested and enjoyed good immunity). Millions of healthy people queued up for a jab they didn’t require which protected against serious disease in the elderly and vulnerable, but was not necessary for most of the rest of us.<br /><br />How this country moved from a policy of only vaccinating those who would benefit to running the risk of inflicting “some freak harm” on people like Lisa Shaw may yet turn out to be one of the great scandals of the age.<br /><br />“I put her on a pedestal,” Gareth Eve says of his late wife, “Lisa was only 5ft 2 and I’m 6 foot, but I put her on a pedestal. She was that wonderful. When she died, because of the way that she died after the jab, it was ‘a dirty secret’, you weren’t supposed to talk about. With AstraZeneca, these companies are run by human beings, you would have thought they were run by human beings, Allison, but they don’t want to talk to the people like me...Zachary doesn’t have his mam because the authorities didn’t give us the full picture about the risks.” <br /><br />I am not an anti-vaxxer but…. Let’s stop saying that, shall we? There’s no shame in being against giving a vaccine to groups who didn’t need it, and which caused people to be dead who should be alive and taking their eight-year-old son to school.",
"to": [
"https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public"
],
"cc": [
"https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/459125347577765888/followers"
],
"tag": [],
"url": "https://www.minds.com/newsfeed/1569956760171581453",
"published": "2023-11-11T06:07:39+00:00",
"attachment": [
{
"type": "Document",
"url": "https://cdn.minds.com/fs/v1/thumbnail/1569955733196247050/xlarge/",
"mediaType": "image/jpeg",
"height": 442,
"width": 714
}
],
"source": {
"content": "The real Covid jab scandal is finally emerging\nThe young and healthy, who were at minimal risk from Covid, should not have been told they had to take the vaccine\n\nhttps://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2023/11/09/the-real-covid-jab-scandal-is-finally-emerging/\n\nAllison Pearson\n9 November 2023 • 7:33pm\n\nI am not an anti-vaxxer but… On 29 April 2021, Lisa Shaw, a clever, sensible, creative, mischievous, award-winning presenter at BBC Radio Newcastle, had her first Covid vaccination. Like millions of us, Lisa was delighted and relieved to get her jab. Not only did the 44-year-old mother of one feel she was doing her bit to keep her community safe (Lisa had been astonished a few weeks earlier when a girlfriend had said she wasn’t getting jabbed), she was excited “to give her mam a hug”.\n\nA few days later, Lisa developed a headache and stabbing pains behind her eyes which wouldn’t go away. By May 16, she was taken by ambulance to University Hospital of North Durham. Tests revealed blood clots in Lisa’s brain and she was moved to a specialist neurology unit in Newcastle. By now, she had difficulty speaking. Scans showed she had suffered a haemorrhage in the brain and part of her skull was removed to try and relieve the pressure. Her husband Gareth Eve remained by his wife’s bedside, but Lisa told him to go home because she was worried about Zachary, their six-year-old. One final kiss. The last time Gareth heard her voice. Lisa Shaw died on May 21 from complications arising from the AstraZeneca Covid vaccination.\n\nThe coroner said: “Ms Shaw was previously fit and well” but it was “clearly established” that her death was due to a very rare “vaccine-induced thrombotic thrombocytopenia (VITT)”, a new condition which leads to swelling and bleeding of the brain.\n\nStrenuous efforts had been made to put the public’s mind at rest when the jab was approved. The Oxford/AstraZeneca vaccine was “a great British success story”, according to the then health secretary Matt Hancock; self-obsessed numpty that he is, Hancock was particularly chuffed the jab had been invented by someone who went to his Oxford college. “It is truly fantastic news – and a triumph for British science – that the @UniofOxford/@AstraZeneca vaccine has been approved for use,” tweeted a triumphant prime minister Boris Johnson.\n\nAt a dark time, the AZ jab brought a blazing ray of hope with the added patriotic, Brexit bonus that the UK was able to steal a march on our European neighbours. After Lisa Shaw died, we were told that the clots are “considered extremely rare,” there had only been 417 reported cases and 72 deaths after 24.8 million first doses and 23.9 million second doses of the AstraZeneca vaccine in the UK. It also saved a great many lives. But expressing reservations about possible side-effects was seen as party-pooping. It meant you ran the risk of being labelled as that most reviled and irresponsible being, an “anti-vaxxer”.\n\n“I had lost my wife and my son had lost his mam, but for an awfully long time people like us weren’t able to tell our story because we were put in the box of crackpots and conspiracy theorists,” Gareth Eve told me yesterday. After Lisa died, Gareth says he had phone conversations with several leading broadcasters. “They would express sympathy, but then they were very nervous, they’d say they have to be very careful, you know, how they report the story without breaching broadcasting guidelines by implying there was any problem with the jab.”\n\nOne beautiful vibrant woman, “loved by everyone whose lives she touched”, was gone. (“I wish it had been me instead of her,” Gareth says, “I do my best as a single dad with Zach, but I’m never going to be Lisa, she was so tactile and loving.”) The fact Lisa Shaw had died after receiving the AZ jab was nothing to worry about, though, in the grand scheme of things, was it?\n\nWell, yes, actually it was. The public – and in particular fit younger people like Lisa – have every right to feel aggrieved. \n\nAs this newspaper reported yesterday, the Oxford-AstraZeneca Covid-19 vaccine has been branded “defective” in a multi-million pound landmark legal action which will suggest that claims over its efficacy were “vastly overstated”. The pharmaceutical giant is being sued in a test case by Jamie Scott, a father-of-two who suffered a significant permanent brain injury, and by the widower and two young children of 35-year-old Alpa Tailor. Both damages claims relate to VITT, the condition that killed Lisa Shaw. AstraZeneca says that the vaccine “has continuously been shown to have an acceptable safety profile” and that “regulators around the world consistently state that the benefits of vaccination outweigh the risks of extremely rare potential side-effects.”\n\nIn the months after her death, Gareth, who was “dealing with grief while you’re trying to parent” didn’t have the emotional energy for a legal battle. “I was in the Coroner’s Court in Newcastle when the coroner said there is no doubt Lisa died because of the AstraZeneca jab and the pathologist said the same and the doctor told Lisa while she was still conscious that the Covid jab had done this to her. It’s like they don’t want there to be any written record that they admitted guilt.” \n\nI must admit there is a strong sense of, “There but for the grace of God go I” when I hear Gareth talking about his wife. I also had the AstraZeneca jab (twice) because, like Lisa, I wanted to reassure my elderly mother and hug her after over a year apart.\n\nWe were all given the impression that the jab could prevent both infection and transmission (why else would they make it mandatory for care home workers?) It sounded brilliant. But the legal claim states, “the absolute risk reduction concerning Covid-19 prevention was only 1.2 per cent”.\n\n“Lisa thought getting the jab was the right thing to do as everybody did,” Gareth recalls, “The Government kept saying it was safe and effective. We didn’t know there were other countries that were withdrawing the AstraZeneca.”\n\nAh, yes, “safe and effective”. How many times did we hear Cabinet ministers intone that reassuring mantra? Yet, use of the word “safe” by any pharmaceutical company advertising a product had been banned for years for exactly that reason – it is misleadingly reassuring. (The Government seems to think the rules didn’t prevent it saying “safe and effective” because it wasn’t advertising a specific product: a Mandy Rice Davis if ever I heard one.)\n\nWhere, you might well ask, was the MHRA (Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency)? Ben Kingsley, a lawyer and co-author of a brilliant and damning new book, The Accountability Deficit, says: “For good reason, the MHRA’s rules did not allow AstraZeneca to promote its vaccine as ‘safe’. Yet, astonishingly, while a raft of other countries were pulling the AZ jab for safety reasons the British regulator stood aside with tragic consequences for Lisa and her family while ministers and the NHS continued to insist that it remained unequivocally safe and effective.”\n\nIt is almost too painful to consider that, 15 days before Lisa Shaw went eagerly to get her Covid jab so she could “hug my mam”, Denmark stopped the use of AstraZeneca in its vaccination rollout after reports of rare but serious cases of blood clots. Finland also announced that it would continue to limit the AstraZeneca vaccine to people aged 65 and over following similar health concerns. Was the MHRA unaware of growing international doubts (AZ was never licensed in the US) or was it, perhaps, rather reluctant to tarnish a great British success story?\n\nIn ethical terms, for a vaccine to be rolled out to people who are not at significant risk from Covid, it would need to be shown to be very safe indeed for those groups. I also clearly remember the head of the Government’s Vaccine Taskforce, Kate Bingham, saying that vaccinating everyone in the country was “not going to happen”. “It’s an adult-only vaccine, for people over 50, focusing on health workers and care home workers and the vulnerable,” she said. Vaccination policy would be aimed at those “most at risk”. She noted that vaccinating healthy people, who are much less likely to have severe outcomes from Covid-19, “could cause them some freak harm”, potentially tipping the scales in terms of the risk-benefit analysis.\n\nWith a heavy heart I’m going to say what should have been said a long time ago. Unlike those who were actually vulnerable to Covid, Lisa Shaw did not need a Covid vaccine; any minuscule benefit to her was outweighed by the small risk. Neither did I (I’d had the virus in January 2020 as plentiful antibodies later attested and enjoyed good immunity). Millions of healthy people queued up for a jab they didn’t require which protected against serious disease in the elderly and vulnerable, but was not necessary for most of the rest of us.\n\nHow this country moved from a policy of only vaccinating those who would benefit to running the risk of inflicting “some freak harm” on people like Lisa Shaw may yet turn out to be one of the great scandals of the age.\n\n“I put her on a pedestal,” Gareth Eve says of his late wife, “Lisa was only 5ft 2 and I’m 6 foot, but I put her on a pedestal. She was that wonderful. When she died, because of the way that she died after the jab, it was ‘a dirty secret’, you weren’t supposed to talk about. With AstraZeneca, these companies are run by human beings, you would have thought they were run by human beings, Allison, but they don’t want to talk to the people like me...Zachary doesn’t have his mam because the authorities didn’t give us the full picture about the risks.” \n\nI am not an anti-vaxxer but…. Let’s stop saying that, shall we? There’s no shame in being against giving a vaccine to groups who didn’t need it, and which caused people to be dead who should be alive and taking their eight-year-old son to school.",
"mediaType": "text/plain"
}
},
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/459125347577765888/entities/urn:activity:1569956760171581453/activity"
},
{
"type": "Create",
"actor": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/459125347577765888",
"object": {
"type": "Note",
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/459125347577765888/entities/urn:activity:1565599702676672530",
"attributedTo": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/459125347577765888",
"content": "Pascal Najadi, son till WEFs medgrundare Hussain Najadi, kräver arrestering av Bill Gates, WHO:s ledning, WEF, Klaus Schwab, Big Tech och Pfizer.<br /><br />Han säger att han och hans mamma nu dör av vaccinet, som han kallar \"gift\".<br /><br />(Credits till Ben Swann på X: <a href=\"https://x.com/benswann_/status/1717978443747328129?s=46&t=o53FpoEvxi7TLgA_APihZA\" target=\"_blank\">https://x.com/benswann_/status/1717978443747328129?s=46&t=o53FpoEvxi7TLgA_APihZA</a>) <a href=\"https://www.minds.com/newsfeed/1565599702676672530\" target=\"_blank\">https://www.minds.com/newsfeed/1565599702676672530</a>",
"to": [
"https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public"
],
"cc": [
"https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/459125347577765888/followers"
],
"tag": [],
"url": "https://www.minds.com/newsfeed/1565599702676672530",
"published": "2023-10-30T05:34:15+00:00",
"source": {
"content": "Pascal Najadi, son till WEFs medgrundare Hussain Najadi, kräver arrestering av Bill Gates, WHO:s ledning, WEF, Klaus Schwab, Big Tech och Pfizer.\n\nHan säger att han och hans mamma nu dör av vaccinet, som han kallar \"gift\".\n\n(Credits till Ben Swann på X: https://x.com/benswann_/status/1717978443747328129?s=46&t=o53FpoEvxi7TLgA_APihZA) https://www.minds.com/newsfeed/1565599702676672530",
"mediaType": "text/plain"
}
},
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/459125347577765888/entities/urn:activity:1565599702676672530/activity"
},
{
"type": "Create",
"actor": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/459125347577765888",
"object": {
"type": "Note",
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/459125347577765888/entities/urn:activity:1565312381867790356",
"attributedTo": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/459125347577765888",
"content": "Var det fatala misstag eller medveten eskalering (av IDF) som orsakade så många dödsoffer? <br /><br />En intressant genomgång av händelserna den 7:e okt.<br />(Video 6 min)<br /><br />\"Before they launch missiles, they launch propaganda campaigns. Before they roll out tanks, they roll out narratives.\" <br /><br />- Caitlin Johnstone <a href=\"https://www.minds.com/newsfeed/1565312381867790356\" target=\"_blank\">https://www.minds.com/newsfeed/1565312381867790356</a>",
"to": [
"https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public"
],
"cc": [
"https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/459125347577765888/followers"
],
"tag": [],
"url": "https://www.minds.com/newsfeed/1565312381867790356",
"published": "2023-10-29T10:32:33+00:00",
"source": {
"content": "Var det fatala misstag eller medveten eskalering (av IDF) som orsakade så många dödsoffer? \n\nEn intressant genomgång av händelserna den 7:e okt.\n(Video 6 min)\n\n\"Before they launch missiles, they launch propaganda campaigns. Before they roll out tanks, they roll out narratives.\" \n\n- Caitlin Johnstone https://www.minds.com/newsfeed/1565312381867790356",
"mediaType": "text/plain"
}
},
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/459125347577765888/entities/urn:activity:1565312381867790356/activity"
},
{
"type": "Create",
"actor": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/459125347577765888",
"object": {
"type": "Note",
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/459125347577765888/entities/urn:activity:1564132164646211602",
"attributedTo": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/459125347577765888",
"content": "X<br />En visselblåsares skildring av vad som enligt honom mest sannolikt hände 7/10 - startskottet på hela den väpnade konflikten i Gaza.<br /><br />Är IDF inkompetenta? Beordrades de att vara passiva i över 7h? Betraktar vid resultatet av en väl utförd false flag-attack?<br /><br />Lyssna & döm själv.<br /><br /><a href=\"https://x.com/widmarkf/status/1717392128840540224?s=46&t=o53FpoEvxi7TLgA_APihZA\" target=\"_blank\">https://x.com/widmarkf/status/1717392128840540224?s=46&t=o53FpoEvxi7TLgA_APihZA</a>",
"to": [
"https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public"
],
"cc": [
"https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/459125347577765888/followers"
],
"tag": [],
"url": "https://www.minds.com/newsfeed/1564132164646211602",
"published": "2023-10-26T04:22:47+00:00",
"attachment": [
{
"type": "Document",
"url": "https://cdn.minds.com/fs/v1/thumbnail/1564131990532263953/xlarge/",
"mediaType": "image/jpeg",
"height": 1400,
"width": 1170
}
],
"source": {
"content": "X\nEn visselblåsares skildring av vad som enligt honom mest sannolikt hände 7/10 - startskottet på hela den väpnade konflikten i Gaza.\n\nÄr IDF inkompetenta? Beordrades de att vara passiva i över 7h? Betraktar vid resultatet av en väl utförd false flag-attack?\n\nLyssna & döm själv.\n\nhttps://x.com/widmarkf/status/1717392128840540224?s=46&t=o53FpoEvxi7TLgA_APihZA",
"mediaType": "text/plain"
}
},
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/459125347577765888/entities/urn:activity:1564132164646211602/activity"
},
{
"type": "Announce",
"actor": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/459125347577765888",
"object": {
"type": "Note",
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/628952369064845314/entities/urn:activity:1563655402594242561",
"attributedTo": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/628952369064845314",
"content": "‼️ According to the Gov't Information Office, Israel dropped over 12,000 tons of explosives on Gaza ‼️<br /><br />Which is equivalent of Hiroshima nuclear bomb. <a href=\"https://www.minds.com/newsfeed/1563655402594242561\" target=\"_blank\">https://www.minds.com/newsfeed/1563655402594242561</a>",
"to": [
"https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public"
],
"cc": [
"https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/628952369064845314/followers"
],
"tag": [],
"url": "https://www.minds.com/newsfeed/1563655402594242561",
"published": "2023-10-24T20:48:18+00:00",
"source": {
"content": "‼️ According to the Gov't Information Office, Israel dropped over 12,000 tons of explosives on Gaza ‼️\n\nWhich is equivalent of Hiroshima nuclear bomb. https://www.minds.com/newsfeed/1563655402594242561",
"mediaType": "text/plain"
}
},
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/459125347577765888/entities/urn:activity:1563776911438516225/activity",
"to": [
"https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public"
],
"cc": [
"https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/628952369064845314",
"https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/459125347577765888/followers"
]
},
{
"type": "Create",
"actor": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/459125347577765888",
"object": {
"type": "Note",
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/459125347577765888/entities/urn:activity:1563770987227385867",
"attributedTo": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/459125347577765888",
"content": "Vilka artister stod upp för dina och mina grundläggande mänskliga rättigheter under de tre senaste åren?<br /><br />Det var verkligen inte många. Five times august senaste singel handlar om de sk. hjältarna som tyst vek ned sig . De sålde istället ut sina fans friheter och hälsa till skrupelfria storföretag…<br /><br />En riktigt skön låt dessutom för övrigt. Gilla och/eller dela om du håller med.<br /><br /><a href=\"https://youtu.be/Z42pqeCicIY\" target=\"_blank\">https://youtu.be/Z42pqeCicIY</a>",
"to": [
"https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public"
],
"cc": [
"https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/459125347577765888/followers"
],
"tag": [],
"url": "https://www.minds.com/newsfeed/1563770987227385867",
"published": "2023-10-25T04:27:35+00:00",
"source": {
"content": "Vilka artister stod upp för dina och mina grundläggande mänskliga rättigheter under de tre senaste åren?\n\nDet var verkligen inte många. Five times august senaste singel handlar om de sk. hjältarna som tyst vek ned sig . De sålde istället ut sina fans friheter och hälsa till skrupelfria storföretag…\n\nEn riktigt skön låt dessutom för övrigt. Gilla och/eller dela om du håller med.\n\nhttps://youtu.be/Z42pqeCicIY",
"mediaType": "text/plain"
}
},
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/459125347577765888/entities/urn:activity:1563770987227385867/activity"
}
],
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/459125347577765888/outbox",
"partOf": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/459125347577765888/outboxoutbox"
}