A small tool to view real-world ActivityPub objects as JSON! Enter a URL
or username from Mastodon or a similar service below, and we'll send a
request with
the right
Accept
header
to the server to view the underlying object.
{
"@context": "https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams",
"type": "OrderedCollectionPage",
"orderedItems": [
{
"type": "Create",
"actor": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/458755339857174528",
"object": {
"type": "Note",
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/458755339857174528/entities/urn:activity:827818542180884480",
"attributedTo": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/458755339857174528",
"content": "This app has taken a dump. Where do I see my coin? This whole crypto Minds business is a sham. The interactive interface isn’t even done with the basic platform of the social media site and they integrate a coin? Stupid ",
"to": [
"https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public"
],
"cc": [
"https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/458755339857174528/followers"
],
"tag": [],
"url": "https://www.minds.com/newsfeed/827818542180884480",
"published": "2018-04-03T08:15:20+00:00",
"source": {
"content": "This app has taken a dump. Where do I see my coin? This whole crypto Minds business is a sham. The interactive interface isn’t even done with the basic platform of the social media site and they integrate a coin? Stupid ",
"mediaType": "text/plain"
}
},
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/458755339857174528/entities/urn:activity:827818542180884480/activity"
},
{
"type": "Create",
"actor": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/458755339857174528",
"object": {
"type": "Note",
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/458755339857174528/entities/urn:activity:594204537909157888",
"attributedTo": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/458755339857174528",
"content": "I want to share my story: <br /><br />My Flat Earth pilot friend and I had a conversation with a high ranking Captain of his airline and here is the paraphrased conversation: We asked 3 main questions. <br /><br />Question #1.) Since the earth is spherical and the curvature is approximately 8 inches per mile squared, does a jet aircraft need to be constantly adjusted nose down to adjust for the curvature of the earth?<br /><br />In other words, we asked, would a plane \"gain altitude\" while flying as the earth surface \"fell away\" due to the curvature? Pilots do not need to constantly dip the nose of the plane down do they we asked? Why would they need to do this, the Captain asked? The reason is, we said, if they did not constantly dip the nose of the plane, on a globe, they would enter into outer space wouldn't they we said. He laughed and agreed. <br /><br />As we explained the earth is 25,000 miles in circumference curving 8 inches per mile squared. If a pilot wanted to maintain altitude at a typical cruising speed of 500 miles per hour you'd have to constantly descend 2777 ft (over half a mile) every minute otherwise you'd be way higher than expected. 2777 ft every minute is a considerable drop and would not in my opinion go unnoticed we said & wouldn't the passengers feel the constant \"dip down\" of the plane as the pilot constantly makes adjustments? <br /><br />The speed a plane travels would, I imagine, mean the plane would be gaining hundreds of feet in altitude every few seconds Or, we said, the alternative is that the earth is FLat? <br /><br />This is where the conversation got interesting, we drew on a diagram on his computer using auto-cad showing the formula for the curve for 1 miles is 1x1x8=8 inches. for 2 miles its 2x2x8=32 inches, for 3 miles it is 3x3x8=72 inches. it gets real big real fast. for 10 miles it would be 10x10x8=800 inches or 66.66 ft and he, The Captain, agreed so we proceeded. <br /><br />We gave him a route example of one flight he had just made flying from Seattle, Wa to New York city is 2857.6 miles by air, that is 1031 miles of curvature the plane would have to encounter in a 6 hour flight. <br /><br />That means the plane would have to descend and as my pilot FE friend said to his Captain, he has talked to several airline pilots and they said once the plane gets to cursing altitude they make no corrections, as if they were flying on a flat plane. <br /><br />Again he became more interested and the Captain agreed with us and then said to us they do not make constant downward corrections in altitude. An aircraft flies at a constant pressure altitude and thus maintains the same relative distance from sea level at all times. If it were to climb as it flew along it would be registering a decreasing pressure which it does not. <br /><br />Question #2.) Okay, so we then asked a similar question.... How does an airplane's Gyroscopic Artificial Horizon account for the Earth's curvature? <br /><br />As I understand it, I said, a gyroscope keeps absolute position and the aircraft rotates around it, allowing the instrument to show the plane's attitude on the artificial horizon... But, logic would dictate that if I flew around the world, the artificial horizon should show me upside down half the time... <br /><br />What does it do to account for this, and prevent erroneous readings? Since we know Curvature is approximately 8\" per squared mile so in 3 miles it will drop 6 ft. He at this time in our conversation pointed out that he doubted the math we originally had given him so together again we did a Correct Curvature analysis. And he was amazed saying he just never thought of it before. <br /><br />Together working on the equation he found our original math to be correct. The correct math is 8 inches times the distance squared. So three miles would be 3 x 3 x 8 = 72 inches. At 500 miles the earth will fall away 166,495 feet. If the plane is traveling 500 mph, the earth is falling away at a rate of 2,775 feet per minute. If autopilot is off, the pilot must reduce altitude by 2,775 feet per minute or 46 feet per second to maintain 35,000 feet. Isn't that much greater than descent rates when landing? He said to this question he did not have an answer so then we threw him our grand finale Fast Ball Pitch Question # 3. <br /><br />Question #3.) We then proceeded to ask the 3rd and final question. Captain we said, how do pilots account for the earths rotation of over 1,000 mph which is faster than the speed of sound (Speed of sound 767 mph) & faster than a pistol bullet (950 mph) and land smoothly coming to a complete stop? <br /><br />We then had to prove to him that NASA claims the earth is spinning over 1,000 mph, and to that he shrugged his shoulders and said what are you saying? The earth is flat ?? We said Yes !! it is flat & motionless. He laughed and said he will have to do some more research, but luckily for us he does not subscribe to the Moon Landing, so maybe we have another victory of one more troop to add to our FE movement... He did have this to say before leaving... \"WHAT BRILLIANT QUESTION's AND EQUALLY BRILLIANT ANSWER's\"... The End....<br />---------------------------------<br /><br />On A Side Note:<br /> We also explained to him before leaving our conversation, that landing an air plane on earth would be akin to trying to land on a treadmill going the same speed if you were to attempt to land the plane on a surface spinning that fast.<br /><br />Another funny topic is when spinning globe supporters try and defend the Heliocentric theory by giving the excuse as to why we can not feel the earth spinning over 1,000 mph, by comparing a person on the inside of a moving train or airplane in a comparison apologetic speech, I tell those people to compare \"apples to apples\". <br /><br />We are not inside of the earth, we are on the surface...outside of the earth... so they are incorrectly comparing the wrong scenarios... It should be if a person was on the outside, or the surface of said train or airplane, what would they experience? <br /><br />Since we are on the surface, or outside, of earth we can only make a comparison to a passenger on the outside of a train or airplane, \"Not\" the inside of said train or plane!!! <br /><br />Remember, at over 1,000 mph that breaks the sound barrier (about 767 mph) and is faster than a pistol bullet (pistol bullet speed is approx 950 mph) yet we can't feel it ? The truth is you can't feel constant velocity. Any change in velocity (acceleration) or direction you can feel. <br /><br />So a rotating Earth, you should be able to feel... Only if earth was moving straight and at a constant speed should it feel motionless, but then you would get blown off, if not fastened in, and we do not feel air speeds that account for anything other than... a still motionless flat earth.<br /><br />The easiest subject to look into concerning flat earth research, is the topic of earth being motionless. Several studies have been conducted that confirm we are motionless, like the Michelson-Morley tests etc..",
"to": [
"https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public"
],
"cc": [
"https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/458755339857174528/followers"
],
"tag": [],
"url": "https://www.minds.com/newsfeed/594204537909157888",
"published": "2016-06-27T16:36:39+00:00",
"source": {
"content": "I want to share my story: \n\nMy Flat Earth pilot friend and I had a conversation with a high ranking Captain of his airline and here is the paraphrased conversation: We asked 3 main questions. \n\nQuestion #1.) Since the earth is spherical and the curvature is approximately 8 inches per mile squared, does a jet aircraft need to be constantly adjusted nose down to adjust for the curvature of the earth?\n\nIn other words, we asked, would a plane \"gain altitude\" while flying as the earth surface \"fell away\" due to the curvature? Pilots do not need to constantly dip the nose of the plane down do they we asked? Why would they need to do this, the Captain asked? The reason is, we said, if they did not constantly dip the nose of the plane, on a globe, they would enter into outer space wouldn't they we said. He laughed and agreed. \n\nAs we explained the earth is 25,000 miles in circumference curving 8 inches per mile squared. If a pilot wanted to maintain altitude at a typical cruising speed of 500 miles per hour you'd have to constantly descend 2777 ft (over half a mile) every minute otherwise you'd be way higher than expected. 2777 ft every minute is a considerable drop and would not in my opinion go unnoticed we said & wouldn't the passengers feel the constant \"dip down\" of the plane as the pilot constantly makes adjustments? \n\nThe speed a plane travels would, I imagine, mean the plane would be gaining hundreds of feet in altitude every few seconds Or, we said, the alternative is that the earth is FLat? \n\nThis is where the conversation got interesting, we drew on a diagram on his computer using auto-cad showing the formula for the curve for 1 miles is 1x1x8=8 inches. for 2 miles its 2x2x8=32 inches, for 3 miles it is 3x3x8=72 inches. it gets real big real fast. for 10 miles it would be 10x10x8=800 inches or 66.66 ft and he, The Captain, agreed so we proceeded. \n\nWe gave him a route example of one flight he had just made flying from Seattle, Wa to New York city is 2857.6 miles by air, that is 1031 miles of curvature the plane would have to encounter in a 6 hour flight. \n\nThat means the plane would have to descend and as my pilot FE friend said to his Captain, he has talked to several airline pilots and they said once the plane gets to cursing altitude they make no corrections, as if they were flying on a flat plane. \n\nAgain he became more interested and the Captain agreed with us and then said to us they do not make constant downward corrections in altitude. An aircraft flies at a constant pressure altitude and thus maintains the same relative distance from sea level at all times. If it were to climb as it flew along it would be registering a decreasing pressure which it does not. \n\nQuestion #2.) Okay, so we then asked a similar question.... How does an airplane's Gyroscopic Artificial Horizon account for the Earth's curvature? \n\nAs I understand it, I said, a gyroscope keeps absolute position and the aircraft rotates around it, allowing the instrument to show the plane's attitude on the artificial horizon... But, logic would dictate that if I flew around the world, the artificial horizon should show me upside down half the time... \n\nWhat does it do to account for this, and prevent erroneous readings? Since we know Curvature is approximately 8\" per squared mile so in 3 miles it will drop 6 ft. He at this time in our conversation pointed out that he doubted the math we originally had given him so together again we did a Correct Curvature analysis. And he was amazed saying he just never thought of it before. \n\nTogether working on the equation he found our original math to be correct. The correct math is 8 inches times the distance squared. So three miles would be 3 x 3 x 8 = 72 inches. At 500 miles the earth will fall away 166,495 feet. If the plane is traveling 500 mph, the earth is falling away at a rate of 2,775 feet per minute. If autopilot is off, the pilot must reduce altitude by 2,775 feet per minute or 46 feet per second to maintain 35,000 feet. Isn't that much greater than descent rates when landing? He said to this question he did not have an answer so then we threw him our grand finale Fast Ball Pitch Question # 3. \n\nQuestion #3.) We then proceeded to ask the 3rd and final question. Captain we said, how do pilots account for the earths rotation of over 1,000 mph which is faster than the speed of sound (Speed of sound 767 mph) & faster than a pistol bullet (950 mph) and land smoothly coming to a complete stop? \n\nWe then had to prove to him that NASA claims the earth is spinning over 1,000 mph, and to that he shrugged his shoulders and said what are you saying? The earth is flat ?? We said Yes !! it is flat & motionless. He laughed and said he will have to do some more research, but luckily for us he does not subscribe to the Moon Landing, so maybe we have another victory of one more troop to add to our FE movement... He did have this to say before leaving... \"WHAT BRILLIANT QUESTION's AND EQUALLY BRILLIANT ANSWER's\"... The End....\n---------------------------------\n\nOn A Side Note:\n We also explained to him before leaving our conversation, that landing an air plane on earth would be akin to trying to land on a treadmill going the same speed if you were to attempt to land the plane on a surface spinning that fast.\n\nAnother funny topic is when spinning globe supporters try and defend the Heliocentric theory by giving the excuse as to why we can not feel the earth spinning over 1,000 mph, by comparing a person on the inside of a moving train or airplane in a comparison apologetic speech, I tell those people to compare \"apples to apples\". \n\nWe are not inside of the earth, we are on the surface...outside of the earth... so they are incorrectly comparing the wrong scenarios... It should be if a person was on the outside, or the surface of said train or airplane, what would they experience? \n\nSince we are on the surface, or outside, of earth we can only make a comparison to a passenger on the outside of a train or airplane, \"Not\" the inside of said train or plane!!! \n\nRemember, at over 1,000 mph that breaks the sound barrier (about 767 mph) and is faster than a pistol bullet (pistol bullet speed is approx 950 mph) yet we can't feel it ? The truth is you can't feel constant velocity. Any change in velocity (acceleration) or direction you can feel. \n\nSo a rotating Earth, you should be able to feel... Only if earth was moving straight and at a constant speed should it feel motionless, but then you would get blown off, if not fastened in, and we do not feel air speeds that account for anything other than... a still motionless flat earth.\n\nThe easiest subject to look into concerning flat earth research, is the topic of earth being motionless. Several studies have been conducted that confirm we are motionless, like the Michelson-Morley tests etc..",
"mediaType": "text/plain"
}
},
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/458755339857174528/entities/urn:activity:594204537909157888/activity"
}
],
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/458755339857174528/outbox",
"partOf": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/458755339857174528/outboxoutbox"
}