A small tool to view real-world ActivityPub objects as JSON! Enter a URL
or username from Mastodon or a similar service below, and we'll send a
request with
the right
Accept
header
to the server to view the underlying object.
{
"@context": "https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams",
"type": "OrderedCollectionPage",
"orderedItems": [
{
"type": "Create",
"actor": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1411180890813370376",
"object": {
"type": "Note",
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1411180890813370376/entities/urn:activity:1527280324663316496",
"attributedTo": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1411180890813370376",
"content": "This whole <a href=\"https://www.minds.com/search?f=top&t=all&q=climatescam\" title=\"#climatescam\" class=\"u-url hashtag\" target=\"_blank\">#climatescam</a> is getting out of hand. The proponents of it show weather disasters and blame it on man-made climate change. It ain't so. Great floods have occurred since ancient times of recorded history. And just because you show a flood does not mean man did it via his carbon emissions. Their primary goal is to push man back to the pre-industrial age, where fossil fuels were just gunk in the ground that no one knew what to do with. Don't let them convince you that this is good; man using fossil fuels have saved countless human lived from extreme cold and extreme heat. Why do they want man to die and to suffer? Because they think man has no right to change his environment to suit his own needs. Don't let them convince you of that.<br />",
"to": [
"https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public"
],
"cc": [
"https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1411180890813370376/followers"
],
"tag": [],
"url": "https://www.minds.com/newsfeed/1527280324663316496",
"published": "2023-07-16T11:46:44+00:00",
"source": {
"content": "This whole #climatescam is getting out of hand. The proponents of it show weather disasters and blame it on man-made climate change. It ain't so. Great floods have occurred since ancient times of recorded history. And just because you show a flood does not mean man did it via his carbon emissions. Their primary goal is to push man back to the pre-industrial age, where fossil fuels were just gunk in the ground that no one knew what to do with. Don't let them convince you that this is good; man using fossil fuels have saved countless human lived from extreme cold and extreme heat. Why do they want man to die and to suffer? Because they think man has no right to change his environment to suit his own needs. Don't let them convince you of that.\n",
"mediaType": "text/plain"
}
},
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1411180890813370376/entities/urn:activity:1527280324663316496/activity"
},
{
"type": "Create",
"actor": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1411180890813370376",
"object": {
"type": "Note",
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1411180890813370376/entities/urn:activity:1525678558708502538",
"attributedTo": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1411180890813370376",
"content": "<a href=\"https://appliedphilosophyonline.com/farview-incorporated-and-selected-poems.html\" target=\"_blank\">https://appliedphilosophyonline.com/farview-incorporated-and-selected-poems.html</a><br />",
"to": [
"https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public"
],
"cc": [
"https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1411180890813370376/followers"
],
"tag": [],
"url": "https://www.minds.com/newsfeed/1525678558708502538",
"published": "2023-07-12T01:41:53+00:00",
"source": {
"content": "https://appliedphilosophyonline.com/farview-incorporated-and-selected-poems.html\n",
"mediaType": "text/plain"
}
},
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1411180890813370376/entities/urn:activity:1525678558708502538/activity"
},
{
"type": "Create",
"actor": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1411180890813370376",
"object": {
"type": "Note",
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1411180890813370376/entities/urn:activity:1525678427699417099",
"attributedTo": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1411180890813370376",
"content": "<a href=\"https://appliedphilosophyonline.com/the-solar-current-is-nuptially-tuned.html\" target=\"_blank\">https://appliedphilosophyonline.com/the-solar-current-is-nuptially-tuned.html</a><br />",
"to": [
"https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public"
],
"cc": [
"https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1411180890813370376/followers"
],
"tag": [],
"url": "https://www.minds.com/newsfeed/1525678427699417099",
"published": "2023-07-12T01:41:22+00:00",
"source": {
"content": "https://appliedphilosophyonline.com/the-solar-current-is-nuptially-tuned.html\n",
"mediaType": "text/plain"
}
},
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1411180890813370376/entities/urn:activity:1525678427699417099/activity"
},
{
"type": "Create",
"actor": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1411180890813370376",
"object": {
"type": "Note",
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1411180890813370376/entities/urn:activity:1514612343923806223",
"attributedTo": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1411180890813370376",
"content": "Book publishing prices are going up shortly, but I am not raising my prices. Get yours now while they are on sale:<br /><br /><a href=\"https://appliedphilosophyonline.com/the-solar-current-is-nuptially-tuned.html\" target=\"_blank\">https://appliedphilosophyonline.com/the-solar-current-is-nuptially-tuned.html</a><br />",
"to": [
"https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public"
],
"cc": [
"https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1411180890813370376/followers"
],
"tag": [],
"url": "https://www.minds.com/newsfeed/1514612343923806223",
"published": "2023-06-11T12:48:42+00:00",
"source": {
"content": "Book publishing prices are going up shortly, but I am not raising my prices. Get yours now while they are on sale:\n\nhttps://appliedphilosophyonline.com/the-solar-current-is-nuptially-tuned.html\n",
"mediaType": "text/plain"
}
},
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1411180890813370376/entities/urn:activity:1514612343923806223/activity"
},
{
"type": "Create",
"actor": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1411180890813370376",
"object": {
"type": "Note",
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1411180890813370376/entities/urn:activity:1510922803459657734",
"attributedTo": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1411180890813370376",
"content": "Kant's transcendentalism (From a Google Search)<br /><br />This is evasion of the highest order—the attempt to know something of reason without observations, and the claim that the mind imposes form onto the object, making everything subjective (the mind creates the reality that we observe or is the Nouméa imposed onto the phenomena).<br /><br />Ayn Rand has said (close to a quote): \"Don't ask me what Kant meant by reason, ask Kant.\"<br /><br />\"What is transcendentalism according to Kant?<br /><br />transcendental idealism, also called formalistic idealism, term applied to the epistemology of the 18th-century German philosopher Immanuel Kant, who held that the human self, or transcendental ego, constructs knowledge out of sense impressions and from universal concepts called categories that it imposes upon them.\"<br /><br />\"What are Kant's three transcendental ideas?<br /><br />Transcendental ideas, according to Kant, are (1) necessary, (2) purely rational and (3) inferred concepts (4) whose object is something unconditioned. They are (1) necessary (A327/B383) and (2) purely rational in that they arise naturally from the logical use of reason.\"",
"to": [
"https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public"
],
"cc": [
"https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1411180890813370376/followers"
],
"tag": [],
"url": "https://www.minds.com/newsfeed/1510922803459657734",
"published": "2023-06-01T08:27:47+00:00",
"source": {
"content": "Kant's transcendentalism (From a Google Search)\n\nThis is evasion of the highest order—the attempt to know something of reason without observations, and the claim that the mind imposes form onto the object, making everything subjective (the mind creates the reality that we observe or is the Nouméa imposed onto the phenomena).\n\nAyn Rand has said (close to a quote): \"Don't ask me what Kant meant by reason, ask Kant.\"\n\n\"What is transcendentalism according to Kant?\n\ntranscendental idealism, also called formalistic idealism, term applied to the epistemology of the 18th-century German philosopher Immanuel Kant, who held that the human self, or transcendental ego, constructs knowledge out of sense impressions and from universal concepts called categories that it imposes upon them.\"\n\n\"What are Kant's three transcendental ideas?\n\nTranscendental ideas, according to Kant, are (1) necessary, (2) purely rational and (3) inferred concepts (4) whose object is something unconditioned. They are (1) necessary (A327/B383) and (2) purely rational in that they arise naturally from the logical use of reason.\"",
"mediaType": "text/plain"
}
},
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1411180890813370376/entities/urn:activity:1510922803459657734/activity"
},
{
"type": "Create",
"actor": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1411180890813370376",
"object": {
"type": "Note",
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1411180890813370376/entities/urn:activity:1509950611490082828",
"attributedTo": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1411180890813370376",
"content": "Why architecture?<br /><br /><br /><br />\"Howard Roark chose architecture for a career because he wanted to be productive, and he wanted to build things to his own standard. When one chooses a career, one has to think about what one wants to do within the realm of reason and reality and make a go for it. There is no guarantee that you will wind up in a career that pays big dollars, but one’s happiness is more important than money. That is why Roark was happy the whole time — a metaphysical happiness (one that has to do with the nature of reality) that was there with him, even though he had to give it up for a while and work in the granite quarry. One ought not to pursue a career blindly, but go along with what you love to do and try to make money from it. I love writing, and I am trying to make money from my website and two books I have published, and I am writing a novel, which should be out sometime in 2025 (I’m aiming at that date). I am happy to write even these Quora answers because I make them philosophic. This is what Ayn Rand has to say about a career (she has a lot more to say about career on the whole page I refer you to):\"<br /><br /><br /><br /><a href=\"https://www.quora.com/Why-did-Howard-Roark-choose-architecture-as-his-career-at-the-start-of-The-Fountainhead/answer/Thomas-M-Miovas-Jr\" target=\"_blank\">https://www.quora.com/Why-did-Howard-Roark-choose-architecture-as-his-career-at-the-start-of-The-Fountainhead/answer/Thomas-M-Miovas-Jr</a><br /><br />",
"to": [
"https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public"
],
"cc": [
"https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1411180890813370376/followers"
],
"tag": [],
"url": "https://www.minds.com/newsfeed/1509950611490082828",
"published": "2023-05-29T16:04:38+00:00",
"source": {
"content": "Why architecture?\n\n\n\n\"Howard Roark chose architecture for a career because he wanted to be productive, and he wanted to build things to his own standard. When one chooses a career, one has to think about what one wants to do within the realm of reason and reality and make a go for it. There is no guarantee that you will wind up in a career that pays big dollars, but one’s happiness is more important than money. That is why Roark was happy the whole time — a metaphysical happiness (one that has to do with the nature of reality) that was there with him, even though he had to give it up for a while and work in the granite quarry. One ought not to pursue a career blindly, but go along with what you love to do and try to make money from it. I love writing, and I am trying to make money from my website and two books I have published, and I am writing a novel, which should be out sometime in 2025 (I’m aiming at that date). I am happy to write even these Quora answers because I make them philosophic. This is what Ayn Rand has to say about a career (she has a lot more to say about career on the whole page I refer you to):\"\n\n\n\nhttps://www.quora.com/Why-did-Howard-Roark-choose-architecture-as-his-career-at-the-start-of-The-Fountainhead/answer/Thomas-M-Miovas-Jr\n\n",
"mediaType": "text/plain"
}
},
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1411180890813370376/entities/urn:activity:1509950611490082828/activity"
},
{
"type": "Create",
"actor": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1411180890813370376",
"object": {
"type": "Note",
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1411180890813370376/entities/urn:activity:1509164239871283206",
"attributedTo": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1411180890813370376",
"content": "Aristotle<br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br />\"I greatly admire Aristotle for coming up with a down to earth rational philosophy. Unlike his teacher, Plato, who had a pie in the sky rationalistic philosophy not based on the facts but is self-consistent (for the most part). Aristotle learned how to be self-consistent from his teacher, but applied such consistency to the study of factual things he observed around him. Aristotle laid down the groundwork for a consistent presentation of the laws of logic and syllogisms such that if premise one and premise two were consistent with reality (were true) then the conclusion followed and was true. And if you want to see great homage to Aristotle in a novel, check out Ayn Rand’s Atlas Shrugged, because the headings of her divisions of her novel came straight from Aristotle. And his virtues were rational virtues based on an assessment of man that he could be good and display his goodness proudly. Here is what Ayn Rand had to say about Aristotle:\"<br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><a href=\"https://www.quora.com/Why-do-you-like-Aristotle/answer/Thomas-M-Miovas-Jr\" target=\"_blank\">https://www.quora.com/Why-do-you-like-Aristotle/answer/Thomas-M-Miovas-Jr</a><br /><br /><br />",
"to": [
"https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public"
],
"cc": [
"https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1411180890813370376/followers"
],
"tag": [],
"url": "https://www.minds.com/newsfeed/1509164239871283206",
"published": "2023-05-27T11:59:52+00:00",
"source": {
"content": "Aristotle\n\n\n\n\n\n\"I greatly admire Aristotle for coming up with a down to earth rational philosophy. Unlike his teacher, Plato, who had a pie in the sky rationalistic philosophy not based on the facts but is self-consistent (for the most part). Aristotle learned how to be self-consistent from his teacher, but applied such consistency to the study of factual things he observed around him. Aristotle laid down the groundwork for a consistent presentation of the laws of logic and syllogisms such that if premise one and premise two were consistent with reality (were true) then the conclusion followed and was true. And if you want to see great homage to Aristotle in a novel, check out Ayn Rand’s Atlas Shrugged, because the headings of her divisions of her novel came straight from Aristotle. And his virtues were rational virtues based on an assessment of man that he could be good and display his goodness proudly. Here is what Ayn Rand had to say about Aristotle:\"\n\n\n\n\nhttps://www.quora.com/Why-do-you-like-Aristotle/answer/Thomas-M-Miovas-Jr\n\n\n",
"mediaType": "text/plain"
}
},
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1411180890813370376/entities/urn:activity:1509164239871283206/activity"
},
{
"type": "Create",
"actor": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1411180890813370376",
"object": {
"type": "Note",
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1411180890813370376/entities/urn:activity:1508716487123144718",
"attributedTo": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1411180890813370376",
"content": "<a href=\"https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0BRDDRH7M\" target=\"_blank\">https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0BRDDRH7M</a><br />",
"to": [
"https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public"
],
"cc": [
"https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1411180890813370376/followers"
],
"tag": [],
"url": "https://www.minds.com/newsfeed/1508716487123144718",
"published": "2023-05-26T06:20:40+00:00",
"source": {
"content": "https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0BRDDRH7M\n",
"mediaType": "text/plain"
}
},
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1411180890813370376/entities/urn:activity:1508716487123144718/activity"
},
{
"type": "Create",
"actor": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1411180890813370376",
"object": {
"type": "Note",
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1411180890813370376/entities/urn:activity:1508716174722994185",
"attributedTo": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1411180890813370376",
"content": "<a href=\"https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0BSDTLJZD\" target=\"_blank\">https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0BSDTLJZD</a><br />",
"to": [
"https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public"
],
"cc": [
"https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1411180890813370376/followers"
],
"tag": [],
"url": "https://www.minds.com/newsfeed/1508716174722994185",
"published": "2023-05-26T06:19:25+00:00",
"source": {
"content": "https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0BSDTLJZD\n",
"mediaType": "text/plain"
}
},
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1411180890813370376/entities/urn:activity:1508716174722994185/activity"
},
{
"type": "Create",
"actor": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1411180890813370376",
"object": {
"type": "Note",
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1411180890813370376/entities/urn:activity:1507557253018816528",
"attributedTo": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1411180890813370376",
"content": "Time<br /><br /><br /><br /><br />\"The concept of time in philosophy depends on the philosophy you are asking about. In Objectivism, Ayn Rand’s philosophy, time is a specific type of relationship of a moving thing to a standard periodic motion. Time is not a substance, but rather is a relationship. When you say it happened in a day, you mean that it happened while the sun was up. And this is why Relativity is the correct way of looking at time, with clocks measuring motions commensurate with periodic clocks. Here is what Ayn Rand’s top student and heir to her philosophy stated about time:\"<br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><a href=\"https://www.quora.com/What-is-time-in-philosophy/answer/Thomas-M-Miovas-Jr\" target=\"_blank\">https://www.quora.com/What-is-time-in-philosophy/answer/Thomas-M-Miovas-Jr</a><br /><br /><br />",
"to": [
"https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public"
],
"cc": [
"https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1411180890813370376/followers"
],
"tag": [],
"url": "https://www.minds.com/newsfeed/1507557253018816528",
"published": "2023-05-23T01:34:17+00:00",
"source": {
"content": "Time\n\n\n\n\n\"The concept of time in philosophy depends on the philosophy you are asking about. In Objectivism, Ayn Rand’s philosophy, time is a specific type of relationship of a moving thing to a standard periodic motion. Time is not a substance, but rather is a relationship. When you say it happened in a day, you mean that it happened while the sun was up. And this is why Relativity is the correct way of looking at time, with clocks measuring motions commensurate with periodic clocks. Here is what Ayn Rand’s top student and heir to her philosophy stated about time:\"\n\n\n\n\nhttps://www.quora.com/What-is-time-in-philosophy/answer/Thomas-M-Miovas-Jr\n\n\n",
"mediaType": "text/plain"
}
},
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1411180890813370376/entities/urn:activity:1507557253018816528/activity"
},
{
"type": "Create",
"actor": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1411180890813370376",
"object": {
"type": "Note",
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1411180890813370376/entities/urn:activity:1507340237653676043",
"attributedTo": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1411180890813370376",
"content": "On another forum, the issue of taxes came up, and yes, they are high and getting higher. Our Founders would have rebelled by now, considering without representation they were being taxed at 1%. So, what has happened to America? Well, it's simple -- altruism -- the duty to live for the sake of others -- is the ruling morality today. The idea of lowering taxes to the point where one cannot have a welfare state is beyond most people, who would shudder to think that those on welfare would be left high and dry. And I am including Social Security and Medicare, both of which are welfare Ponzi rackets. I think to counteract that stance one has to be rationally selfish, and make the bold claim that one ought to keep one's hard-earned dollars and stop letting the government dictate what it will be spent on.",
"to": [
"https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public"
],
"cc": [
"https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1411180890813370376/followers"
],
"tag": [],
"url": "https://www.minds.com/newsfeed/1507340237653676043",
"published": "2023-05-22T11:11:56+00:00",
"source": {
"content": "On another forum, the issue of taxes came up, and yes, they are high and getting higher. Our Founders would have rebelled by now, considering without representation they were being taxed at 1%. So, what has happened to America? Well, it's simple -- altruism -- the duty to live for the sake of others -- is the ruling morality today. The idea of lowering taxes to the point where one cannot have a welfare state is beyond most people, who would shudder to think that those on welfare would be left high and dry. And I am including Social Security and Medicare, both of which are welfare Ponzi rackets. I think to counteract that stance one has to be rationally selfish, and make the bold claim that one ought to keep one's hard-earned dollars and stop letting the government dictate what it will be spent on.",
"mediaType": "text/plain"
}
},
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1411180890813370376/entities/urn:activity:1507340237653676043/activity"
},
{
"type": "Create",
"actor": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1411180890813370376",
"object": {
"type": "Note",
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1411180890813370376/entities/urn:activity:1506181126559895558",
"attributedTo": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1411180890813370376",
"content": "Moral idealism<br /><br /><br /><br /><br />\"One should be a moral idealist because your life depends on it, according to Ayn Rand’s moral code. You see, in Objectivism (Ayn Rand’s philosophy), man’s life as a biological living entity is the standard of the Objectivist ethics. There are certain things you have to pursue to remain alive (food, shelter, inspirational art, logical thinking, etc.); and there are certain things one has to avoid if one is to remain alive (poison. being out in extreme weather naked, muddy and unformed art, depressing mental drifting, etc.). And while one might not die immediately doing the bad things in this list, one will suffer and will not be able to pursue one’s happiness. One’s own happiness is the goal of being virtuous; that is, when one pursues life promoting values, one will be happy instead of the self-depreciating misery of not having any values to sustain one’s self. In other words, one can be happy by a proper standard, as I write about on my website:\"<br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><a href=\"https://www.quora.com/Why-should-one-always-be-a-moral-idealist/answer/Thomas-M-Miovas-Jr\" target=\"_blank\">https://www.quora.com/Why-should-one-always-be-a-moral-idealist/answer/Thomas-M-Miovas-Jr</a><br /><br /><br />",
"to": [
"https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public"
],
"cc": [
"https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1411180890813370376/followers"
],
"tag": [],
"url": "https://www.minds.com/newsfeed/1506181126559895558",
"published": "2023-05-19T06:26:03+00:00",
"source": {
"content": "Moral idealism\n\n\n\n\n\"One should be a moral idealist because your life depends on it, according to Ayn Rand’s moral code. You see, in Objectivism (Ayn Rand’s philosophy), man’s life as a biological living entity is the standard of the Objectivist ethics. There are certain things you have to pursue to remain alive (food, shelter, inspirational art, logical thinking, etc.); and there are certain things one has to avoid if one is to remain alive (poison. being out in extreme weather naked, muddy and unformed art, depressing mental drifting, etc.). And while one might not die immediately doing the bad things in this list, one will suffer and will not be able to pursue one’s happiness. One’s own happiness is the goal of being virtuous; that is, when one pursues life promoting values, one will be happy instead of the self-depreciating misery of not having any values to sustain one’s self. In other words, one can be happy by a proper standard, as I write about on my website:\"\n\n\n\n\nhttps://www.quora.com/Why-should-one-always-be-a-moral-idealist/answer/Thomas-M-Miovas-Jr\n\n\n",
"mediaType": "text/plain"
}
},
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1411180890813370376/entities/urn:activity:1506181126559895558/activity"
},
{
"type": "Create",
"actor": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1411180890813370376",
"object": {
"type": "Note",
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1411180890813370376/entities/urn:activity:1506096876552720385",
"attributedTo": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1411180890813370376",
"content": "Those who seek to have nature remain consistent throughout a hundred-year time period are the same type of people who seek to have man's innovation stop at today's level. AI is just one such example. It is here, and should not be stopped, though we have to be careful in what it has control of. So long as it enhances human creativity, I see nothing wrong with it. But if it is put in charge of nuclear weapons, I would be against that. And I would be against AI being involved in government law making, as it takes rationality (which AI does not have) to keep laws in accordance with individual rights:<br /><br /><a href=\"https://courses.aynrand.org/works/mans-rights/\" target=\"_blank\">https://courses.aynrand.org/works/mans-rights/</a><br />",
"to": [
"https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public"
],
"cc": [
"https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1411180890813370376/followers"
],
"tag": [],
"url": "https://www.minds.com/newsfeed/1506096876552720385",
"published": "2023-05-19T00:51:16+00:00",
"source": {
"content": "Those who seek to have nature remain consistent throughout a hundred-year time period are the same type of people who seek to have man's innovation stop at today's level. AI is just one such example. It is here, and should not be stopped, though we have to be careful in what it has control of. So long as it enhances human creativity, I see nothing wrong with it. But if it is put in charge of nuclear weapons, I would be against that. And I would be against AI being involved in government law making, as it takes rationality (which AI does not have) to keep laws in accordance with individual rights:\n\nhttps://courses.aynrand.org/works/mans-rights/\n",
"mediaType": "text/plain"
}
},
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1411180890813370376/entities/urn:activity:1506096876552720385/activity"
}
],
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1411180890813370376/outbox",
"partOf": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1411180890813370376/outboxoutbox"
}