A small tool to view real-world ActivityPub objects as JSON! Enter a URL
or username from Mastodon or a similar service below, and we'll send a
request with
the right
Accept
header
to the server to view the underlying object.
{
"@context": "https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams",
"type": "OrderedCollectionPage",
"orderedItems": [
{
"type": "Create",
"actor": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1251652579524354066",
"object": {
"type": "Note",
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1251652579524354066/entities/urn:activity:1293689096224378897",
"attributedTo": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1251652579524354066",
"content": "Bitcoin has normalized crypto. This will eventually lead to mass adoption of centralized digital currencies as the general public doesn’t understand that subtile difference between a centralized and decentralized technology. Furthermore the government will likely make promises that they can “fix” efficiency and oversight issues with bitcoin through centralization. If I were the government I would love electronic centralized currency, as a citizen it’s a horrendous concept. ",
"to": [
"https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public"
],
"cc": [
"https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1251652579524354066/followers"
],
"tag": [],
"url": "https://www.minds.com/newsfeed/1293689096224378897",
"published": "2021-10-09T21:38:35+00:00",
"source": {
"content": "Bitcoin has normalized crypto. This will eventually lead to mass adoption of centralized digital currencies as the general public doesn’t understand that subtile difference between a centralized and decentralized technology. Furthermore the government will likely make promises that they can “fix” efficiency and oversight issues with bitcoin through centralization. If I were the government I would love electronic centralized currency, as a citizen it’s a horrendous concept. ",
"mediaType": "text/plain"
}
},
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1251652579524354066/entities/urn:activity:1293689096224378897/activity"
},
{
"type": "Create",
"actor": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1251652579524354066",
"object": {
"type": "Note",
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1251652579524354066/entities/urn:activity:1293615312893120528",
"attributedTo": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1251652579524354066",
"content": "As more People adopt smart thermostats and smart watering systems the government will begin to control when and how you heat and cool your house and control when your yards are watered by exerting pressure on the companies that manage those systems. ",
"to": [
"https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public"
],
"cc": [
"https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1251652579524354066/followers"
],
"tag": [],
"url": "https://www.minds.com/newsfeed/1293615312893120528",
"published": "2021-10-09T16:45:24+00:00",
"source": {
"content": "As more People adopt smart thermostats and smart watering systems the government will begin to control when and how you heat and cool your house and control when your yards are watered by exerting pressure on the companies that manage those systems. ",
"mediaType": "text/plain"
}
},
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1251652579524354066/entities/urn:activity:1293615312893120528/activity"
},
{
"type": "Create",
"actor": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1251652579524354066",
"object": {
"type": "Note",
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1251652579524354066/entities/urn:activity:1285997849032527889",
"attributedTo": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1251652579524354066",
"content": "Before discussing political economics and regulation of markets its best to watch this fun and simplistic AI demo to show you how markets work. <br /><a href=\"https://youtu.be/PNtKXWNKGN8\" target=\"_blank\">https://youtu.be/PNtKXWNKGN8</a>",
"to": [
"https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public"
],
"cc": [
"https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1251652579524354066/followers"
],
"tag": [],
"url": "https://www.minds.com/newsfeed/1285997849032527889",
"published": "2021-09-18T16:16:19+00:00",
"source": {
"content": "Before discussing political economics and regulation of markets its best to watch this fun and simplistic AI demo to show you how markets work. \nhttps://youtu.be/PNtKXWNKGN8",
"mediaType": "text/plain"
}
},
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1251652579524354066/entities/urn:activity:1285997849032527889/activity"
},
{
"type": "Create",
"actor": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1251652579524354066",
"object": {
"type": "Note",
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1251652579524354066/entities/urn:activity:1285982722333872135",
"attributedTo": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1251652579524354066",
"content": "Why bitcoin is a scam. I’m not saying there is not potential in a decentralized currency with a limited number of tokens. I love the idea. I’m saying the implementation it not bitcoin or any other crypto I have seen. They are not used as a currency, they are horribly inefficient, kill the environment, and waste computation resources. <br /><br />Bitcoin is not what it is marketed to be, but the ideas it intended to represent are noble. Unfortunately Bitcoin is a speculative market not a reserve currency. When the stock market crashes next, bitcoin will fall even further. <br /><br /><a href=\"https://youtu.be/0AAUrMuMPlo\" target=\"_blank\">https://youtu.be/0AAUrMuMPlo</a>",
"to": [
"https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public"
],
"cc": [
"https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1251652579524354066/followers"
],
"tag": [],
"url": "https://www.minds.com/newsfeed/1285982722333872135",
"published": "2021-09-18T15:16:12+00:00",
"source": {
"content": "Why bitcoin is a scam. I’m not saying there is not potential in a decentralized currency with a limited number of tokens. I love the idea. I’m saying the implementation it not bitcoin or any other crypto I have seen. They are not used as a currency, they are horribly inefficient, kill the environment, and waste computation resources. \n\nBitcoin is not what it is marketed to be, but the ideas it intended to represent are noble. Unfortunately Bitcoin is a speculative market not a reserve currency. When the stock market crashes next, bitcoin will fall even further. \n\nhttps://youtu.be/0AAUrMuMPlo",
"mediaType": "text/plain"
}
},
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1251652579524354066/entities/urn:activity:1285982722333872135/activity"
},
{
"type": "Create",
"actor": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1251652579524354066",
"object": {
"type": "Note",
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1251652579524354066/entities/urn:activity:1283351788489019394",
"attributedTo": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1251652579524354066",
"content": "Today is the anniversary of 9/11. Remembering that day my biggest fear is that something similar might happen again. Let’s all hope, prey, and work diligently to prevent something like this from reoccurring. Especially with the resurgence of the Taliban and other extremist groups locally and abroad. <br /><br />I recently read this article where the Navy Seal who killed Osama Bin Ladin claims that our biggest threats in the country today are division and hate for each other. Extremism and polarization. He claims that the media and social media hype is incentivized to further this extremism. I agree with him. <br /><br />We need a media atmosphere which is based in reason, intellectual discussion, debate and fighting hype/partisan instincts. The rise of politically motivated social media only makes this worse. We need to bring people together through reasoned and thoughtful discourse even in times of disagreement. <br /><br />After 20 year of war, 20 years of death, I’m happy that the chapter of terror is hopefully and finally coming to an end. These 20 years started with terror and escalated due to spreading terror abroad motivated by hate, revenge, and polarization. Thousands of Americans died and hundreds of thousands of civilians in Iraq and Afghanistan died. Trillions of dollars were wasted. Privacy Rights have been striped away and government spying is ramped. We set the tone that we want security over freedoms and human rights. We are worse off today than we were 20 years ago. <br /><br />We need to remember and morn not just 9/11 but the 20 years of our reactions to it. I have learned that thoughtful, reasoned and intellectual responses and debate could help helped us prevent so much destruction and death. We must not react immediately, rather consider our actions as a country more carefully if we are to stand a chance in avoiding another chapter like the last two decades. ",
"to": [
"https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public"
],
"cc": [
"https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1251652579524354066/followers"
],
"tag": [],
"url": "https://www.minds.com/newsfeed/1283351788489019394",
"published": "2021-09-11T09:01:49+00:00",
"source": {
"content": "Today is the anniversary of 9/11. Remembering that day my biggest fear is that something similar might happen again. Let’s all hope, prey, and work diligently to prevent something like this from reoccurring. Especially with the resurgence of the Taliban and other extremist groups locally and abroad. \n\nI recently read this article where the Navy Seal who killed Osama Bin Ladin claims that our biggest threats in the country today are division and hate for each other. Extremism and polarization. He claims that the media and social media hype is incentivized to further this extremism. I agree with him. \n\nWe need a media atmosphere which is based in reason, intellectual discussion, debate and fighting hype/partisan instincts. The rise of politically motivated social media only makes this worse. We need to bring people together through reasoned and thoughtful discourse even in times of disagreement. \n\nAfter 20 year of war, 20 years of death, I’m happy that the chapter of terror is hopefully and finally coming to an end. These 20 years started with terror and escalated due to spreading terror abroad motivated by hate, revenge, and polarization. Thousands of Americans died and hundreds of thousands of civilians in Iraq and Afghanistan died. Trillions of dollars were wasted. Privacy Rights have been striped away and government spying is ramped. We set the tone that we want security over freedoms and human rights. We are worse off today than we were 20 years ago. \n\nWe need to remember and morn not just 9/11 but the 20 years of our reactions to it. I have learned that thoughtful, reasoned and intellectual responses and debate could help helped us prevent so much destruction and death. We must not react immediately, rather consider our actions as a country more carefully if we are to stand a chance in avoiding another chapter like the last two decades. ",
"mediaType": "text/plain"
}
},
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1251652579524354066/entities/urn:activity:1283351788489019394/activity"
},
{
"type": "Create",
"actor": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1251652579524354066",
"object": {
"type": "Note",
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1251652579524354066/entities/urn:activity:1281213321894170629",
"attributedTo": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1251652579524354066",
"content": "After a quick thought and limited research, I’m tending towards the belief that the EU needs their own military force to pursue their own interests. The Afghanistan disaster should represent to the EU what the United States would be willing to do to our allies in the event we were to need to defend a foreign ally. We would pursue our own interests first and abandon our allies if convenient (no leaving Afghanistan didn’t abandon our allies, leaving abruptly, recklessly and haphazardly did). <br /><br />It’s clear the world is being divided between Chinese (eastern) and American interests. The Europeans are playing smart and playing both eastern and American interests when convenient for them. Given the EU’s economic and political decisions to play both sides when convenient, they will need their own military to continue playing the centrist otherwise the US will eventually try to make them pick a side.<br /><br /><a href=\"https://www.zerohedge.com/geopolitical/will-europe-create-its-own-military-force-after-its-experience-afghanistan\" target=\"_blank\">https://www.zerohedge.com/geopolitical/will-europe-create-its-own-military-force-after-its-experience-afghanistan</a>",
"to": [
"https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public"
],
"cc": [
"https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1251652579524354066/followers"
],
"tag": [],
"url": "https://www.minds.com/newsfeed/1281213321894170629",
"published": "2021-09-05T11:24:19+00:00",
"source": {
"content": "After a quick thought and limited research, I’m tending towards the belief that the EU needs their own military force to pursue their own interests. The Afghanistan disaster should represent to the EU what the United States would be willing to do to our allies in the event we were to need to defend a foreign ally. We would pursue our own interests first and abandon our allies if convenient (no leaving Afghanistan didn’t abandon our allies, leaving abruptly, recklessly and haphazardly did). \n\nIt’s clear the world is being divided between Chinese (eastern) and American interests. The Europeans are playing smart and playing both eastern and American interests when convenient for them. Given the EU’s economic and political decisions to play both sides when convenient, they will need their own military to continue playing the centrist otherwise the US will eventually try to make them pick a side.\n\nhttps://www.zerohedge.com/geopolitical/will-europe-create-its-own-military-force-after-its-experience-afghanistan",
"mediaType": "text/plain"
}
},
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1251652579524354066/entities/urn:activity:1281213321894170629/activity"
},
{
"type": "Create",
"actor": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1251652579524354066",
"object": {
"type": "Note",
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1251652579524354066/entities/urn:activity:1280543874749566996",
"attributedTo": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1251652579524354066",
"content": "Apple postponing the release of CSAM scanning. The tool intended to use your personal devices to scan your personal photos and videos to report illegal content to the United States government. They claim that using your phone to scan your photos and videos was \"An enhancement in privacy\".... They appear to not understand irony and have now rebranded privacy in 1984 style. It seems clear they still intend on releasing tools to spy on you, but they are likely delaying it to figure out a better marketing strategy to sell the public on this abusive tech or give people time to forget they were planning this and release it silently with no detail. Either way, this episode has shown Apple intends to appease regulators by spying, and Apple is comfortable marketing lies to the general public for unclear government interests. <br /><br /><a href=\"https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2021/09/apple-promises-to-change-iphone-photo-scanning-plans-to-address-criticisms/\" target=\"_blank\">https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2021/09/apple-promises-to-change-iphone-photo-scanning-plans-to-address-criticisms/</a>",
"to": [
"https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public"
],
"cc": [
"https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1251652579524354066/followers"
],
"tag": [],
"url": "https://www.minds.com/newsfeed/1280543874749566996",
"published": "2021-09-03T15:04:10+00:00",
"source": {
"content": "Apple postponing the release of CSAM scanning. The tool intended to use your personal devices to scan your personal photos and videos to report illegal content to the United States government. They claim that using your phone to scan your photos and videos was \"An enhancement in privacy\".... They appear to not understand irony and have now rebranded privacy in 1984 style. It seems clear they still intend on releasing tools to spy on you, but they are likely delaying it to figure out a better marketing strategy to sell the public on this abusive tech or give people time to forget they were planning this and release it silently with no detail. Either way, this episode has shown Apple intends to appease regulators by spying, and Apple is comfortable marketing lies to the general public for unclear government interests. \n\nhttps://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2021/09/apple-promises-to-change-iphone-photo-scanning-plans-to-address-criticisms/",
"mediaType": "text/plain"
}
},
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1251652579524354066/entities/urn:activity:1280543874749566996/activity"
},
{
"type": "Create",
"actor": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1251652579524354066",
"object": {
"type": "Note",
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1251652579524354066/entities/urn:activity:1279803966145695763",
"attributedTo": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1251652579524354066",
"content": "Will Apple be tracking suspicious car rides and report them to the government? If they determine that you violate their TOS while in the car you bought from them, will they ban you from driving?<br /><br /><a href=\"https://www.cnbc.com/2021/08/31/apple-could-sell-1point5-million-electric-cars-by-2030-bernstein-speculates.html\" target=\"_blank\">https://www.cnbc.com/2021/08/31/apple-could-sell-1point5-million-electric-cars-by-2030-bernstein-speculates.html</a>",
"to": [
"https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public"
],
"cc": [
"https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1251652579524354066/followers"
],
"tag": [],
"url": "https://www.minds.com/newsfeed/1279803966145695763",
"published": "2021-09-01T14:04:02+00:00",
"source": {
"content": "Will Apple be tracking suspicious car rides and report them to the government? If they determine that you violate their TOS while in the car you bought from them, will they ban you from driving?\n\nhttps://www.cnbc.com/2021/08/31/apple-could-sell-1point5-million-electric-cars-by-2030-bernstein-speculates.html",
"mediaType": "text/plain"
}
},
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1251652579524354066/entities/urn:activity:1279803966145695763/activity"
},
{
"type": "Create",
"actor": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1251652579524354066",
"object": {
"type": "Note",
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1251652579524354066/entities/urn:activity:1279504507201392654",
"attributedTo": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1251652579524354066",
"content": "Great news! The US has failed to protect consumers against App Store monopolists, but countries like South Korea will set an example for the world. It should be illegal to artificially require app developers to use your store to distribute your software and then require 30% of your revenue in order to use that store. South Korea is the first to make Apple and Google’s Developer abuse practices illegal. <br /><br /><a href=\"https://www.cnbc.com/2021/08/31/south-korea-first-country-to-curb-google-apples-in-app-billing-policies.html\" target=\"_blank\">https://www.cnbc.com/2021/08/31/south-korea-first-country-to-curb-google-apples-in-app-billing-policies.html</a>",
"to": [
"https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public"
],
"cc": [
"https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1251652579524354066/followers"
],
"tag": [],
"url": "https://www.minds.com/newsfeed/1279504507201392654",
"published": "2021-08-31T18:14:06+00:00",
"source": {
"content": "Great news! The US has failed to protect consumers against App Store monopolists, but countries like South Korea will set an example for the world. It should be illegal to artificially require app developers to use your store to distribute your software and then require 30% of your revenue in order to use that store. South Korea is the first to make Apple and Google’s Developer abuse practices illegal. \n\nhttps://www.cnbc.com/2021/08/31/south-korea-first-country-to-curb-google-apples-in-app-billing-policies.html",
"mediaType": "text/plain"
}
},
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1251652579524354066/entities/urn:activity:1279504507201392654/activity"
},
{
"type": "Create",
"actor": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1251652579524354066",
"object": {
"type": "Note",
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1251652579524354066/entities/urn:activity:1279041366587871241",
"attributedTo": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1251652579524354066",
"content": "I hold many opinions and make many statements. Sometimes I’m less educated on those topics and learn that I am wrong from posting about them. Sometimes, I would consider myself an “expert” on a specific topic. <br /><br />Apples CSAM update which will search through iPhone photos client side is something I am 100% certain on. This is something Apple could not be more wrong on. This is something that could not be more reckless. Apple’s software will profile and document photos client side. They claim it will only occur if iCloud is enabled. However the software is installed on all Apple devices and we simply need to trust that Apple won’t turn it on. If they change their minds, or feel pressured by government and or politics they will turn it on for everyone. The precedence this sets is horrible. They are openly admitting that they can and are willing to use your personal device to monitor you for the state if they feel the cause is justified. There are currently limitations placed by Apple today, that they can change at a whim on their sole discretion, stopping this feature from being used for other purposes. However Apple has openly admitted to the world, when it suits their best interests, they will spy on you, using your device that you purchased, for the state. This should be illegal and it’s highly unethical. <br /><br /><br />This is my less so certain theory as to why they are doing it: It is a bad implementation done in bad faith. Apple does not care about CSAM, Apple cares about appeasing politicians and proving to the US government that they are a good actor who can help the state. They know that encrypted iCloud storage will claim they are facilitating illegal activity and this is how they will “solve” that narrative. It is another attempt to keep the anti-monopoly political groups at bay because Apple helps the government. Politicians are less likely to choose to breakup Apple or cause political trouble for them when Apple benefits the state. They don’t actually care about CSAM, privacy, your security, you, they care about bad press, politics and maintaining their lucrative cash cows. ",
"to": [
"https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public"
],
"cc": [
"https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1251652579524354066/followers"
],
"tag": [],
"url": "https://www.minds.com/newsfeed/1279041366587871241",
"published": "2021-08-30T11:33:44+00:00",
"source": {
"content": "I hold many opinions and make many statements. Sometimes I’m less educated on those topics and learn that I am wrong from posting about them. Sometimes, I would consider myself an “expert” on a specific topic. \n\nApples CSAM update which will search through iPhone photos client side is something I am 100% certain on. This is something Apple could not be more wrong on. This is something that could not be more reckless. Apple’s software will profile and document photos client side. They claim it will only occur if iCloud is enabled. However the software is installed on all Apple devices and we simply need to trust that Apple won’t turn it on. If they change their minds, or feel pressured by government and or politics they will turn it on for everyone. The precedence this sets is horrible. They are openly admitting that they can and are willing to use your personal device to monitor you for the state if they feel the cause is justified. There are currently limitations placed by Apple today, that they can change at a whim on their sole discretion, stopping this feature from being used for other purposes. However Apple has openly admitted to the world, when it suits their best interests, they will spy on you, using your device that you purchased, for the state. This should be illegal and it’s highly unethical. \n\n\nThis is my less so certain theory as to why they are doing it: It is a bad implementation done in bad faith. Apple does not care about CSAM, Apple cares about appeasing politicians and proving to the US government that they are a good actor who can help the state. They know that encrypted iCloud storage will claim they are facilitating illegal activity and this is how they will “solve” that narrative. It is another attempt to keep the anti-monopoly political groups at bay because Apple helps the government. Politicians are less likely to choose to breakup Apple or cause political trouble for them when Apple benefits the state. They don’t actually care about CSAM, privacy, your security, you, they care about bad press, politics and maintaining their lucrative cash cows. ",
"mediaType": "text/plain"
}
},
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1251652579524354066/entities/urn:activity:1279041366587871241/activity"
},
{
"type": "Create",
"actor": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1251652579524354066",
"object": {
"type": "Note",
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1251652579524354066/entities/urn:activity:1276511948220928020",
"attributedTo": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1251652579524354066",
"content": "President Trump should have never been banned from social media and all those who celebrated this should be ashamed. <br /><br />The Taliban should also not be banned from social media as they now control the fates of 30m people and we all want to know what they plan on doing with these poor souls. What kind of future should we expect for them? What do they believe? Why do they think we went to war with them for 20 years then randomly gave up? <br /><br />If you believe in free speech, that means free speech for all people. Even your former enemies. Not politically manipulative and biased speech like you get on Twitter where they ban people in order to silence their political movements and favor certain candidates and ideas over others. <br /><br />When you display extreme bias towards a sitting President and ban him, but enable a organization we used to call terrorist, it looks like an endorsement to the Taliban as your arbitrary censorship seems to suggest their message is less of a threat than Trump. ",
"to": [
"https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public"
],
"cc": [
"https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1251652579524354066/followers"
],
"tag": [],
"url": "https://www.minds.com/newsfeed/1276511948220928020",
"published": "2021-08-23T12:02:44+00:00",
"source": {
"content": "President Trump should have never been banned from social media and all those who celebrated this should be ashamed. \n\nThe Taliban should also not be banned from social media as they now control the fates of 30m people and we all want to know what they plan on doing with these poor souls. What kind of future should we expect for them? What do they believe? Why do they think we went to war with them for 20 years then randomly gave up? \n\nIf you believe in free speech, that means free speech for all people. Even your former enemies. Not politically manipulative and biased speech like you get on Twitter where they ban people in order to silence their political movements and favor certain candidates and ideas over others. \n\nWhen you display extreme bias towards a sitting President and ban him, but enable a organization we used to call terrorist, it looks like an endorsement to the Taliban as your arbitrary censorship seems to suggest their message is less of a threat than Trump. ",
"mediaType": "text/plain"
}
},
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1251652579524354066/entities/urn:activity:1276511948220928020/activity"
},
{
"type": "Create",
"actor": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1251652579524354066",
"object": {
"type": "Note",
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1251652579524354066/entities/urn:activity:1275766117733765125",
"attributedTo": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1251652579524354066",
"content": "The information that is available for consumption will directly influence the direction of our conclusions. As in, we can only make decisions and have conversations using what information we have. <br /><br />As we move more toward a centralized information control flow where our news and \"facts\" come from an increasingly less diverse set of sources and increasingly less diverse set of opinions, we will find that our decisions and outcomes become more singular. Free Speech and democracy must be practiced together because unless we are all free to make our own good faith critical independent assessments using as much information as possible, the outcomes will be skewed as our dataset is manipulated.",
"to": [
"https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public"
],
"cc": [
"https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1251652579524354066/followers"
],
"tag": [],
"url": "https://www.minds.com/newsfeed/1275766117733765125",
"published": "2021-08-21T10:39:04+00:00",
"source": {
"content": "The information that is available for consumption will directly influence the direction of our conclusions. As in, we can only make decisions and have conversations using what information we have. \n\nAs we move more toward a centralized information control flow where our news and \"facts\" come from an increasingly less diverse set of sources and increasingly less diverse set of opinions, we will find that our decisions and outcomes become more singular. Free Speech and democracy must be practiced together because unless we are all free to make our own good faith critical independent assessments using as much information as possible, the outcomes will be skewed as our dataset is manipulated.",
"mediaType": "text/plain"
}
},
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1251652579524354066/entities/urn:activity:1275766117733765125/activity"
},
{
"type": "Create",
"actor": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1251652579524354066",
"object": {
"type": "Note",
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1251652579524354066/entities/urn:activity:1275438448806727692",
"attributedTo": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1251652579524354066",
"content": "Does this mean that MSM and other “experts” have been wrong calling it an “insurrection” planned on social media despite there being scant evidence of coordination or planning per the FBI? <br /><br /><a href=\"https://www.reuters.com/world/us/exclusive-fbi-finds-scant-evidence-us-capitol-attack-was-coordinated-sources-2021-08-20/\" target=\"_blank\">https://www.reuters.com/world/us/exclusive-fbi-finds-scant-evidence-us-capitol-attack-was-coordinated-sources-2021-08-20/</a>",
"to": [
"https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public"
],
"cc": [
"https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1251652579524354066/followers"
],
"tag": [],
"url": "https://www.minds.com/newsfeed/1275438448806727692",
"published": "2021-08-20T12:57:02+00:00",
"source": {
"content": "Does this mean that MSM and other “experts” have been wrong calling it an “insurrection” planned on social media despite there being scant evidence of coordination or planning per the FBI? \n\nhttps://www.reuters.com/world/us/exclusive-fbi-finds-scant-evidence-us-capitol-attack-was-coordinated-sources-2021-08-20/",
"mediaType": "text/plain"
}
},
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1251652579524354066/entities/urn:activity:1275438448806727692/activity"
}
],
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1251652579524354066/outbox",
"partOf": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1251652579524354066/outboxoutbox"
}