ActivityPub Viewer

A small tool to view real-world ActivityPub objects as JSON! Enter a URL or username from Mastodon or a similar service below, and we'll send a request with the right Accept header to the server to view the underlying object.

Open in browser →
{ "@context": "https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams", "type": "OrderedCollectionPage", "orderedItems": [ { "type": "Create", "actor": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1237871099312611344", "object": { "type": "Note", "id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1237871099312611344/entities/urn:activity:1241972117325357056", "attributedTo": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1237871099312611344", "content": "Do you think there's a serious chance of hyperinflation on the American Dollar? Should there be made a secondary standard for exchange among our community?<br /><a href=\"https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iUXzQtWTOro\" target=\"_blank\">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iUXzQtWTOro</a>", "to": [ "https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public" ], "cc": [ "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1237871099312611344/followers" ], "tag": [], "url": "https://www.minds.com/newsfeed/1241972117325357056", "published": "2021-05-20T04:33:47+00:00", "source": { "content": "Do you think there's a serious chance of hyperinflation on the American Dollar? Should there be made a secondary standard for exchange among our community?\nhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iUXzQtWTOro", "mediaType": "text/plain" } }, "id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1237871099312611344/entities/urn:activity:1241972117325357056/activity" }, { "type": "Create", "actor": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1237871099312611344", "object": { "type": "Note", "id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1237871099312611344/entities/urn:activity:1241971639239663616", "attributedTo": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1237871099312611344", "content": "Given the current climate in our country, should any idea of a political party be put to bed in EPTA? Why or why not?", "to": [ "https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public" ], "cc": [ "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1237871099312611344/followers" ], "tag": [], "url": "https://www.minds.com/newsfeed/1241971639239663616", "published": "2021-05-20T04:31:53+00:00", "source": { "content": "Given the current climate in our country, should any idea of a political party be put to bed in EPTA? Why or why not?", "mediaType": "text/plain" } }, "id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1237871099312611344/entities/urn:activity:1241971639239663616/activity" }, { "type": "Create", "actor": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1237871099312611344", "object": { "type": "Note", "id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1237871099312611344/entities/urn:activity:1241971541959122944", "attributedTo": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1237871099312611344", "content": "A very important bottom line The Distriutist brings up: As it's used currently, the internet is a way to bring out the worst of us - perhaps used or encouraged for use by the worst people - a completely horizontal structure leading to base radicalization, skeptical mockery of the solemn things, and ultimate unaccountability. Especially with our country's political acceleration, this has all gotten markedly worse. \"Normal\" people feel compelled to leave.<br /><br />Though trads tend to have a luddite perspective and scoff the internet altogether (more on that opinion coming soon), it does have amazing potential as a tool for uniting our absolutely diasporic community. It may easily be the only tool we have to do this efficiently. I think if anything's going to be accomplished in reorganizing traditional Americans, online communications will be necessary.<br /><br />So The Distributist is right: we need to learn how to use the internet differently. For us traditionalists especially, we need to stop using social media, messengers, blogs, etc. for addictions of entertainment, vanity, and sloth. Doing something good can't be contingent on us being here in the first place due to personal deficiencies. We need to be forthright about why we justify being online and using free time on such a big occasion of sin; and frankly, I don't think casual browsing has much justification for the average person.<br /><br />Considering populism and uncensored forums aren't easily available to us, we need a new game plan about community planning, too, once users leave casual addictions for the thoughtful approach. That's why I admonish you all to openly share your related thoughts and opinions here, maybe consider this a safe \"second timeline\" for Facebook particularly. If you don't know the members here well enough, we could always have a weekend video conference like the old group did. If you know any friends who like discussing these topics, then please feel free to invite them!<br /><br />But what is that game plan regarding online use? How do you think valuable voices can be compelled forward online while removing low-quality, low-virtue users that stifle the conversation? How would gatekeeping work best?<br /><br />Again, another good stream all around. I like The Distributist's thoughtfulness about new problems.<br /><a href=\"https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8SpKmZFsNok\" target=\"_blank\">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8SpKmZFsNok</a>", "to": [ "https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public" ], "cc": [ "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1237871099312611344/followers" ], "tag": [], "url": "https://www.minds.com/newsfeed/1241971541959122944", "published": "2021-05-20T04:31:30+00:00", "source": { "content": "A very important bottom line The Distriutist brings up: As it's used currently, the internet is a way to bring out the worst of us - perhaps used or encouraged for use by the worst people - a completely horizontal structure leading to base radicalization, skeptical mockery of the solemn things, and ultimate unaccountability. Especially with our country's political acceleration, this has all gotten markedly worse. \"Normal\" people feel compelled to leave.\n\nThough trads tend to have a luddite perspective and scoff the internet altogether (more on that opinion coming soon), it does have amazing potential as a tool for uniting our absolutely diasporic community. It may easily be the only tool we have to do this efficiently. I think if anything's going to be accomplished in reorganizing traditional Americans, online communications will be necessary.\n\nSo The Distributist is right: we need to learn how to use the internet differently. For us traditionalists especially, we need to stop using social media, messengers, blogs, etc. for addictions of entertainment, vanity, and sloth. Doing something good can't be contingent on us being here in the first place due to personal deficiencies. We need to be forthright about why we justify being online and using free time on such a big occasion of sin; and frankly, I don't think casual browsing has much justification for the average person.\n\nConsidering populism and uncensored forums aren't easily available to us, we need a new game plan about community planning, too, once users leave casual addictions for the thoughtful approach. That's why I admonish you all to openly share your related thoughts and opinions here, maybe consider this a safe \"second timeline\" for Facebook particularly. If you don't know the members here well enough, we could always have a weekend video conference like the old group did. If you know any friends who like discussing these topics, then please feel free to invite them!\n\nBut what is that game plan regarding online use? How do you think valuable voices can be compelled forward online while removing low-quality, low-virtue users that stifle the conversation? How would gatekeeping work best?\n\nAgain, another good stream all around. I like The Distributist's thoughtfulness about new problems.\nhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8SpKmZFsNok", "mediaType": "text/plain" } }, "id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1237871099312611344/entities/urn:activity:1241971541959122944/activity" }, { "type": "Create", "actor": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1237871099312611344", "object": { "type": "Note", "id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1237871099312611344/entities/urn:activity:1238915391660994560", "attributedTo": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1237871099312611344", "content": "Pretty good stream about where \"the right\" goes from here, specifically after Donald Trump's presidency. His discussion isn't couched just in political terms, however; The Distributist subscribes to the \"reactionary\" position that the current political struggle we face in America is primarily about a culture war (I wouldn't call it reactionary, but that's the nominal term floating around on the internet). Consequently, he's given frame to the worldview, petitions, and goals of us traditionalists. We're included here, even if we don't properly belong as what's called \"the right.\"<br /><br />I like two of his concepts in particular: firstly, the fact that a populist right-wing movement (what he accurately describes as a peasant revolt, ergo low-involvement, low-skill actors) will NOT solve our problems, and secondly, that we need to get away from dead-in-the-water, Republican-esque symbolism and arguments like constantly harping about the US Constitution. Instead of constantly defending the liceity of someone's right to say something conservative/traditional, the merit of the actual argument should be considered instead. And when it's said (going back to the first point) a degree of authority and education should be used saying it to preserve \"quality control.\"<br /><br />Let me know your thoughts. There's a lot here!<br /><a href=\"https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qNLxeZx9K_s&amp;t=2153s\" target=\"_blank\">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qNLxeZx9K_s&amp;t=2153s</a>", "to": [ "https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public" ], "cc": [ "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1237871099312611344/followers" ], "tag": [], "url": "https://www.minds.com/newsfeed/1238915391660994560", "published": "2021-05-11T18:07:27+00:00", "source": { "content": "Pretty good stream about where \"the right\" goes from here, specifically after Donald Trump's presidency. His discussion isn't couched just in political terms, however; The Distributist subscribes to the \"reactionary\" position that the current political struggle we face in America is primarily about a culture war (I wouldn't call it reactionary, but that's the nominal term floating around on the internet). Consequently, he's given frame to the worldview, petitions, and goals of us traditionalists. We're included here, even if we don't properly belong as what's called \"the right.\"\n\nI like two of his concepts in particular: firstly, the fact that a populist right-wing movement (what he accurately describes as a peasant revolt, ergo low-involvement, low-skill actors) will NOT solve our problems, and secondly, that we need to get away from dead-in-the-water, Republican-esque symbolism and arguments like constantly harping about the US Constitution. Instead of constantly defending the liceity of someone's right to say something conservative/traditional, the merit of the actual argument should be considered instead. And when it's said (going back to the first point) a degree of authority and education should be used saying it to preserve \"quality control.\"\n\nLet me know your thoughts. There's a lot here!\nhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qNLxeZx9K_s&t=2153s", "mediaType": "text/plain" } }, "id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1237871099312611344/entities/urn:activity:1238915391660994560/activity" }, { "type": "Create", "actor": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1237871099312611344", "object": { "type": "Note", "id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1237871099312611344/entities/urn:activity:1238915097587806208", "attributedTo": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1237871099312611344", "content": "(This subject might be cross-posted depending on how relevant it becomes)<br /><br />Let me start with one of the chief things that bothers me about tradition (don't think I'm being too negative or attacking anyone; I'm only critiquing with the understanding that there's always room for improvement, and that the spiritual battle: 1) manifests in everything that we do, and; 2) can never go truly stagnant, but is always increasing or decreasing). We have our rich academic patrimony decently preserved in smaller, passionate colleges throughout the country. I'm proud to have gone to one of them, and they do well to impart to students who really listen the vision of a principled, moral, Catholic, high-functioning world, and the hope that our Modern circumstances still have the potential for such a thing. In other words, we have the intellectual tools to try for an oasis of Christendom in whatever profession we take up after those college years. To slowly nudge the world to a better place, so to speak. However, traditionalists don't really do it much in practice. Let's look at entrepreneurs and high-level corporate officers in particular because there's less of a legitimate excuse there. The additional powers that come with leadership come with more responsibility. Plus, business owners obviously have full reign to implement their values into business practice (corporations are obviously a bit different, but a certain position of influence remains). The few businesses our communities currently have feel too isolated, and regardless of academic formation floating around, most of them just follow whatever the \"seculars\" (unbelievers) inadvertently carry on as the norm. I get it, it's easier and probably less legal trouble.<br /><br />But easy isn't what God gave to any of us as a life calling. Expedience is great until you have the ability to do better. And, well, doing better is the whole point of this group.<br /><br />Here's the solution: recall it's stated that EPTA shall create a \"business group\" when feasible. With enough success, the group can then be organized into a sort of trade league down the road. Membership would work to include existing trad businesses in addition new upstarts encouraged by our Association (the high visibility of a league of businesses publicly dedicated to our principles and the Faith will ultimately draw a clientele who reciprocate those values, too; immediate customer access eliminates one of the hardest aspects of starting a new business and so creates a business incubator I intend to leverage for our members). All members would be bound, as a stipulation for membership in the league, to do business with other members before outside companies where possible (for example, if it's a product or service that can be shipped, as there's no guarantee that league members will be physically proximate to each other besides being in the US). The mutual promise of guaranteed business incentivizes upstarts to \"fill in\" every sector of the economy, as they would effectively hold the monopoly in unoccupied sectors (regulation and an arbitration body would obviously be established to prevent abuse and quality control) until more competition establishes themselves. Recreating a semi-contained economy complete with developed supply chains would mean fair wages and an abundance of jobs for EPTA's members, quality products and services for customers, power to influence local and national law governing business practice (an EPTA-governed lobby could be a thing), financial capability to build our communities into what we want, and the financial capability to encourage philanthropic efforts and the Church to flourish beyond what's possible in our own lifetimes. Leo XIII's worker-centered vision would be a reality actively competing with the increasingly hellish corporate oligarchy we're currently stuck with. Economic sectors with enough individual businesses could then coordinate with the league to create industry-specific registered guilds to act as regulators and ensurers of certain traditionalist industry standards. Consumers could also apply for their own form of \"membership\" in order to access league products and services, or perhaps those same products and services at the standard intra-league discount, as there's no expectation that league businesses can't also accept consumer business from outside the league. There's all sorts of ways regulation and memberships can be formed in the future, and none of it's currently set in stone. There really needs to be a closer examination of the fine print of such a league project, I'm sure, but the idea's good enough to pursue if feasible. The ultimate effect is a private, non-political method for making it possible for us to live by distributist and Catholic values in the business world. Worried about being cancelled? You can't, you have your own business and a clientele that already believes in your values. Worried your bank will drop you? The amount of cash flow would allow EPTA to simply begin something like its own credit union. The sky's the limit when you put your work life in-line with your faith life. <br /><br />All it takes it literally not simply acquiescing to the path of least resistance. I don't think it's too much to ask of people to use the potential God gave them. After all, we'll be accountable in heaven for how we've used it on earth.", "to": [ "https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public" ], "cc": [ "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1237871099312611344/followers" ], "tag": [], "url": "https://www.minds.com/newsfeed/1238915097587806208", "published": "2021-05-11T18:06:15+00:00", "source": { "content": "(This subject might be cross-posted depending on how relevant it becomes)\n\nLet me start with one of the chief things that bothers me about tradition (don't think I'm being too negative or attacking anyone; I'm only critiquing with the understanding that there's always room for improvement, and that the spiritual battle: 1) manifests in everything that we do, and; 2) can never go truly stagnant, but is always increasing or decreasing). We have our rich academic patrimony decently preserved in smaller, passionate colleges throughout the country. I'm proud to have gone to one of them, and they do well to impart to students who really listen the vision of a principled, moral, Catholic, high-functioning world, and the hope that our Modern circumstances still have the potential for such a thing. In other words, we have the intellectual tools to try for an oasis of Christendom in whatever profession we take up after those college years. To slowly nudge the world to a better place, so to speak. However, traditionalists don't really do it much in practice. Let's look at entrepreneurs and high-level corporate officers in particular because there's less of a legitimate excuse there. The additional powers that come with leadership come with more responsibility. Plus, business owners obviously have full reign to implement their values into business practice (corporations are obviously a bit different, but a certain position of influence remains). The few businesses our communities currently have feel too isolated, and regardless of academic formation floating around, most of them just follow whatever the \"seculars\" (unbelievers) inadvertently carry on as the norm. I get it, it's easier and probably less legal trouble.\n\nBut easy isn't what God gave to any of us as a life calling. Expedience is great until you have the ability to do better. And, well, doing better is the whole point of this group.\n\nHere's the solution: recall it's stated that EPTA shall create a \"business group\" when feasible. With enough success, the group can then be organized into a sort of trade league down the road. Membership would work to include existing trad businesses in addition new upstarts encouraged by our Association (the high visibility of a league of businesses publicly dedicated to our principles and the Faith will ultimately draw a clientele who reciprocate those values, too; immediate customer access eliminates one of the hardest aspects of starting a new business and so creates a business incubator I intend to leverage for our members). All members would be bound, as a stipulation for membership in the league, to do business with other members before outside companies where possible (for example, if it's a product or service that can be shipped, as there's no guarantee that league members will be physically proximate to each other besides being in the US). The mutual promise of guaranteed business incentivizes upstarts to \"fill in\" every sector of the economy, as they would effectively hold the monopoly in unoccupied sectors (regulation and an arbitration body would obviously be established to prevent abuse and quality control) until more competition establishes themselves. Recreating a semi-contained economy complete with developed supply chains would mean fair wages and an abundance of jobs for EPTA's members, quality products and services for customers, power to influence local and national law governing business practice (an EPTA-governed lobby could be a thing), financial capability to build our communities into what we want, and the financial capability to encourage philanthropic efforts and the Church to flourish beyond what's possible in our own lifetimes. Leo XIII's worker-centered vision would be a reality actively competing with the increasingly hellish corporate oligarchy we're currently stuck with. Economic sectors with enough individual businesses could then coordinate with the league to create industry-specific registered guilds to act as regulators and ensurers of certain traditionalist industry standards. Consumers could also apply for their own form of \"membership\" in order to access league products and services, or perhaps those same products and services at the standard intra-league discount, as there's no expectation that league businesses can't also accept consumer business from outside the league. There's all sorts of ways regulation and memberships can be formed in the future, and none of it's currently set in stone. There really needs to be a closer examination of the fine print of such a league project, I'm sure, but the idea's good enough to pursue if feasible. The ultimate effect is a private, non-political method for making it possible for us to live by distributist and Catholic values in the business world. Worried about being cancelled? You can't, you have your own business and a clientele that already believes in your values. Worried your bank will drop you? The amount of cash flow would allow EPTA to simply begin something like its own credit union. The sky's the limit when you put your work life in-line with your faith life. \n\nAll it takes it literally not simply acquiescing to the path of least resistance. I don't think it's too much to ask of people to use the potential God gave them. After all, we'll be accountable in heaven for how we've used it on earth.", "mediaType": "text/plain" } }, "id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1237871099312611344/entities/urn:activity:1238915097587806208/activity" }, { "type": "Create", "actor": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1237871099312611344", "object": { "type": "Note", "id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1237871099312611344/entities/urn:activity:1238914226421837824", "attributedTo": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1237871099312611344", "content": "A beautiful illustration of the Medieval concept behind the university, an institution owing its very birth to the cathedral schools of the Catholic Church. Obviously the height of post-secondary education isn't anything close to the garbage taught today. Modern schools generally have been on the decline since the Federal Department of Education began implementing liberalized standards to them back in the 1960s. The material difficulty, understanding of average test scores, and student quality over time (in addition to the gauging of tuition, which makes the modern thing an obvious racket) really attest to the fact that education has gotten away from its real point. John Dewey in particular did much to erode the foundations of philosophy underpinning why and how formal education is important. Consequently, most people's understanding of why we do it today is wrong.<br /><br />It's about the holistic formation of the man, who is defined and governed first by his intellect. University is not simply a place to fill the intellect with menial technical knowledge good for wages. The goal, in addition to some edifying knowledge itself, is to teach the student how to think, and why he must think. Eventually, come graduation, the ideal product of education is a honed rational autonomy. When given new situations and little outside pressure or observation, the graduate should have ready not just the tools of the intellect, but tools for the will to do the right thing, to thus reach our full potential before God.<br />In the illustration you see the Medieval Seven Liberal Arts surrounding the central circle: from the top going clockwise, Grammar, Rhetoric, and Logic (Dialectics) - which compose the Trivium - and Music, Mathematics, Geometry, and Astronomy - the Quadrivium. In the middle top is Lady Philosophy personified, below whom are the philosophers Plato and Socrates, the most essential for realist philosophy (the baseline for the Scholastic method when Aristotle was added).<br /><br />The term \"Trivium\" nominally means \"where the three roads meet,\" and was considered the lower of the liberal arts because it's the necessary foundation for all further thinking. The Quadrivium was graduated, and would be learned at higher levels. The Seven Liberal Arts themselves are opposed to the traditional Practical Arts, particularly Law and Medicine, although others existed like Architecture.", "to": [ "https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public" ], "cc": [ "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1237871099312611344/followers" ], "tag": [], "url": "https://www.minds.com/newsfeed/1238914226421837824", "published": "2021-05-11T18:02:48+00:00", "source": { "content": "A beautiful illustration of the Medieval concept behind the university, an institution owing its very birth to the cathedral schools of the Catholic Church. Obviously the height of post-secondary education isn't anything close to the garbage taught today. Modern schools generally have been on the decline since the Federal Department of Education began implementing liberalized standards to them back in the 1960s. The material difficulty, understanding of average test scores, and student quality over time (in addition to the gauging of tuition, which makes the modern thing an obvious racket) really attest to the fact that education has gotten away from its real point. John Dewey in particular did much to erode the foundations of philosophy underpinning why and how formal education is important. Consequently, most people's understanding of why we do it today is wrong.\n\nIt's about the holistic formation of the man, who is defined and governed first by his intellect. University is not simply a place to fill the intellect with menial technical knowledge good for wages. The goal, in addition to some edifying knowledge itself, is to teach the student how to think, and why he must think. Eventually, come graduation, the ideal product of education is a honed rational autonomy. When given new situations and little outside pressure or observation, the graduate should have ready not just the tools of the intellect, but tools for the will to do the right thing, to thus reach our full potential before God.\nIn the illustration you see the Medieval Seven Liberal Arts surrounding the central circle: from the top going clockwise, Grammar, Rhetoric, and Logic (Dialectics) - which compose the Trivium - and Music, Mathematics, Geometry, and Astronomy - the Quadrivium. In the middle top is Lady Philosophy personified, below whom are the philosophers Plato and Socrates, the most essential for realist philosophy (the baseline for the Scholastic method when Aristotle was added).\n\nThe term \"Trivium\" nominally means \"where the three roads meet,\" and was considered the lower of the liberal arts because it's the necessary foundation for all further thinking. The Quadrivium was graduated, and would be learned at higher levels. The Seven Liberal Arts themselves are opposed to the traditional Practical Arts, particularly Law and Medicine, although others existed like Architecture.", "mediaType": "text/plain" } }, "id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1237871099312611344/entities/urn:activity:1238914226421837824/activity" }, { "type": "Create", "actor": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1237871099312611344", "object": { "type": "Note", "id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1237871099312611344/entities/urn:activity:1238913855785553920", "attributedTo": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1237871099312611344", "content": "FYI, the government is actually watching. <br /><br />It's important our social media presence remains secure - whether that's our own platform down the road, or gatekeeping groups like this. It's important trad social media groups work together to guarantee capable leadership and admission procedures as well (another perk behind the idea of EPTA). Not fanatics saying stupid things. I know of several such Catholic Facebook groups that have just recently suffered infiltrations.<br /><br />I'm thinking about how to verify the quality of new OSG member applications. It might not be a good idea to let in any old stranger.<br /><a href=\"https://conventionofstates.com/news/the-post-office-is-running-a-covert-operation-that-monitors-americans-social-media-posts\" target=\"_blank\">https://conventionofstates.com/news/the-post-office-is-running-a-covert-operation-that-monitors-americans-social-media-posts</a>", "to": [ "https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public" ], "cc": [ "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1237871099312611344/followers" ], "tag": [], "url": "https://www.minds.com/newsfeed/1238913855785553920", "published": "2021-05-11T18:01:21+00:00", "source": { "content": "FYI, the government is actually watching. \n\nIt's important our social media presence remains secure - whether that's our own platform down the road, or gatekeeping groups like this. It's important trad social media groups work together to guarantee capable leadership and admission procedures as well (another perk behind the idea of EPTA). Not fanatics saying stupid things. I know of several such Catholic Facebook groups that have just recently suffered infiltrations.\n\nI'm thinking about how to verify the quality of new OSG member applications. It might not be a good idea to let in any old stranger.\nhttps://conventionofstates.com/news/the-post-office-is-running-a-covert-operation-that-monitors-americans-social-media-posts", "mediaType": "text/plain" } }, "id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1237871099312611344/entities/urn:activity:1238913855785553920/activity" }, { "type": "Create", "actor": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1237871099312611344", "object": { "type": "Note", "id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1237871099312611344/entities/urn:activity:1238913377510076416", "attributedTo": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1237871099312611344", "content": "I'm working on an American pan-trad survey. What questions should I ask? What shouldn't I ask? I really need some input here...", "to": [ "https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public" ], "cc": [ "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1237871099312611344/followers" ], "tag": [], "url": "https://www.minds.com/newsfeed/1238913377510076416", "published": "2021-05-11T17:59:27+00:00", "source": { "content": "I'm working on an American pan-trad survey. What questions should I ask? What shouldn't I ask? I really need some input here...", "mediaType": "text/plain" } }, "id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1237871099312611344/entities/urn:activity:1238913377510076416/activity" }, { "type": "Create", "actor": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1237871099312611344", "object": { "type": "Note", "id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1237871099312611344/entities/urn:activity:1238913264464187392", "attributedTo": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1237871099312611344", "content": "A friend brought up the need for reliable news reporting. Do you have any good trad sources? Should a new one be started?", "to": [ "https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public" ], "cc": [ "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1237871099312611344/followers" ], "tag": [], "url": "https://www.minds.com/newsfeed/1238913264464187392", "published": "2021-05-11T17:59:00+00:00", "source": { "content": "A friend brought up the need for reliable news reporting. Do you have any good trad sources? Should a new one be started?", "mediaType": "text/plain" } }, "id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1237871099312611344/entities/urn:activity:1238913264464187392/activity" } ], "id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1237871099312611344/outbox", "partOf": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1237871099312611344/outboxoutbox" }