A small tool to view real-world ActivityPub objects as JSON! Enter a URL
or username from Mastodon or a similar service below, and we'll send a
request with
the right
Accept
header
to the server to view the underlying object.
{
"@context": "https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams",
"type": "OrderedCollectionPage",
"orderedItems": [
{
"type": "Create",
"actor": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1224762086337290243",
"object": {
"type": "Note",
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1224762086337290243/entities/urn:activity:1639319451054641161",
"attributedTo": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1224762086337290243",
"content": "“The Charter is a Trojan Horse. What else would you expect from Pierre Trudeau?<br />First off, there is the \"reasonable limits\" clause in the very first section. <br /><br />“Then, we have the ludicrous \"Notwithstanding Clause\" that allows any provincial government to override citizens' so-called 'rights'. <br /><br />“And finally, we have the deceitful ‘Section 15’, where individual legal rights are 'guaranteed' in 15(1), but then immediately superceded by the 'group rights' delineated in 15(2)...”<br /><a href=\"https://constitutioncanada.wordpress.com/2024/05/20/the-charter-is-a-trojan-horse/\" target=\"_blank\">https://constitutioncanada.wordpress.com/2024/05/20/the-charter-is-a-trojan-horse/</a>",
"to": [
"https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public"
],
"cc": [
"https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1224762086337290243/followers"
],
"tag": [],
"url": "https://www.minds.com/newsfeed/1639319451054641161",
"published": "2024-05-20T15:50:13+00:00",
"source": {
"content": "“The Charter is a Trojan Horse. What else would you expect from Pierre Trudeau?\nFirst off, there is the \"reasonable limits\" clause in the very first section. \n\n“Then, we have the ludicrous \"Notwithstanding Clause\" that allows any provincial government to override citizens' so-called 'rights'. \n\n“And finally, we have the deceitful ‘Section 15’, where individual legal rights are 'guaranteed' in 15(1), but then immediately superceded by the 'group rights' delineated in 15(2)...”\nhttps://constitutioncanada.wordpress.com/2024/05/20/the-charter-is-a-trojan-horse/",
"mediaType": "text/plain"
}
},
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1224762086337290243/entities/urn:activity:1639319451054641161/activity"
},
{
"type": "Create",
"actor": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1224762086337290243",
"object": {
"type": "Note",
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1224762086337290243/entities/urn:activity:1637575465499627539",
"attributedTo": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1224762086337290243",
"content": "NOTE: This post was originally published on our old website, on Nov.30, 2020:<br /><br />\"This is a clear and flagrant violation of the Canadian Constitution...<br /><br /> “With some exceptions, people are not allowed to cross the Quebec border into New Brunswick during the COVID-19 pandemic.”<br /><br /> “However, section 92 of the Constitution Act, 1867 does not provide the provinces the authority to impose controls and checkpoints against other provinces, irrespective of whatever declarations of emergency they have made at the provincial level...” <br /><a href=\"https://constitutioncanada.wordpress.com/2024/05/15/province-still-ignoring-the-constitution/\" target=\"_blank\">https://constitutioncanada.wordpress.com/2024/05/15/province-still-ignoring-the-constitution/</a>",
"to": [
"https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public"
],
"cc": [
"https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1224762086337290243/followers"
],
"tag": [],
"url": "https://www.minds.com/newsfeed/1637575465499627539",
"published": "2024-05-15T20:20:15+00:00",
"attachment": [
{
"type": "Document",
"url": "https://cdn.minds.com/fs/v1/thumbnail/1637575356707770374/xlarge/",
"mediaType": "image/jpeg",
"height": 450,
"width": 800
}
],
"source": {
"content": "NOTE: This post was originally published on our old website, on Nov.30, 2020:\n\n\"This is a clear and flagrant violation of the Canadian Constitution...\n\n “With some exceptions, people are not allowed to cross the Quebec border into New Brunswick during the COVID-19 pandemic.”\n\n “However, section 92 of the Constitution Act, 1867 does not provide the provinces the authority to impose controls and checkpoints against other provinces, irrespective of whatever declarations of emergency they have made at the provincial level...” \nhttps://constitutioncanada.wordpress.com/2024/05/15/province-still-ignoring-the-constitution/",
"mediaType": "text/plain"
}
},
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1224762086337290243/entities/urn:activity:1637575465499627539/activity"
},
{
"type": "Create",
"actor": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1224762086337290243",
"object": {
"type": "Note",
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1224762086337290243/entities/urn:activity:1637208156499087364",
"attributedTo": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1224762086337290243",
"content": "NOTE: This post was originally published on our old website, on Sept.20, 2020:<br /> “On 1 April, Quebec announced that it would use its provincial police, La Sûreté du Québec, and municipal police forces to set up border checkpoints with Ontario, New Brunswick, and Labrador. New Brunswick as of 25 March and Nova Scotia as of 23 March had imposed similar measures...<br /><br /> “However, section 92 of the Constitution Act, 1867 does not provide the provinces the authority to impose controls and checkpoints against other provinces, irrespective of whatever declarations of emergency they have made at the provincial level...”<br /><a href=\"https://constitutioncanada.wordpress.com/2024/05/14/provinces-ignoring-the-constitution/\" target=\"_blank\">https://constitutioncanada.wordpress.com/2024/05/14/provinces-ignoring-the-constitution/</a>",
"to": [
"https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public"
],
"cc": [
"https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1224762086337290243/followers"
],
"tag": [],
"url": "https://www.minds.com/newsfeed/1637208156499087364",
"published": "2024-05-14T20:00:41+00:00",
"attachment": [
{
"type": "Document",
"url": "https://cdn.minds.com/fs/v1/thumbnail/1637208143517716491/xlarge/",
"mediaType": "image/jpeg",
"height": 470,
"width": 800
}
],
"source": {
"content": "NOTE: This post was originally published on our old website, on Sept.20, 2020:\n “On 1 April, Quebec announced that it would use its provincial police, La Sûreté du Québec, and municipal police forces to set up border checkpoints with Ontario, New Brunswick, and Labrador. New Brunswick as of 25 March and Nova Scotia as of 23 March had imposed similar measures...\n\n “However, section 92 of the Constitution Act, 1867 does not provide the provinces the authority to impose controls and checkpoints against other provinces, irrespective of whatever declarations of emergency they have made at the provincial level...”\nhttps://constitutioncanada.wordpress.com/2024/05/14/provinces-ignoring-the-constitution/",
"mediaType": "text/plain"
}
},
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1224762086337290243/entities/urn:activity:1637208156499087364/activity"
},
{
"type": "Create",
"actor": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1224762086337290243",
"object": {
"type": "Note",
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1224762086337290243/entities/urn:activity:1630324062288875533",
"attributedTo": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1224762086337290243",
"content": "'In Case You Missed It' - from 2018:<br />Another court decision that damages Canada and is caused by flawed and illogical Constitutional ‘interpretations’ from our politicized and unaccountable Supreme Court of Canada:<br /><br /> “Enter the Supreme Court of Canada with a decision that eviscerates any real hope that Canada will ever have what real nations such as Australia and the United States enjoy — legal protection of internal free trade...”<br /><a href=\"https://constitutioncdn.wordpress.com/2018/04/21/supreme-court-screws-up-again/\" target=\"_blank\">https://constitutioncdn.wordpress.com/2018/04/21/supreme-court-screws-up-again/</a>",
"to": [
"https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public"
],
"cc": [
"https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1224762086337290243/followers"
],
"tag": [],
"url": "https://www.minds.com/newsfeed/1630324062288875533",
"published": "2024-04-25T20:05:45+00:00",
"attachment": [
{
"type": "Document",
"url": "https://cdn.minds.com/fs/v1/thumbnail/1630324039958401038/xlarge/",
"mediaType": "image/jpeg",
"height": 475,
"width": 800
}
],
"source": {
"content": "'In Case You Missed It' - from 2018:\nAnother court decision that damages Canada and is caused by flawed and illogical Constitutional ‘interpretations’ from our politicized and unaccountable Supreme Court of Canada:\n\n “Enter the Supreme Court of Canada with a decision that eviscerates any real hope that Canada will ever have what real nations such as Australia and the United States enjoy — legal protection of internal free trade...”\nhttps://constitutioncdn.wordpress.com/2018/04/21/supreme-court-screws-up-again/",
"mediaType": "text/plain"
}
},
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1224762086337290243/entities/urn:activity:1630324062288875533/activity"
},
{
"type": "Create",
"actor": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1224762086337290243",
"object": {
"type": "Note",
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1224762086337290243/entities/urn:activity:1630323228029227025",
"attributedTo": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1224762086337290243",
"content": "'In Case You Missed It' - from 2018:<br />Another court decision that damages Canada and is caused by flawed and illogical Constitutional ‘interpretations’ from our politicized and unaccountable Supreme Court of Canada:<br /><br /> “Enter the Supreme Court of Canada with a decision that eviscerates any real hope that Canada will ever have what real nations such as Australia and the United States enjoy — legal protection of internal free trade...”<br /><a href=\"https://constitutioncdn.wordpress.com/2018/04/21/supreme-court-screws-up-again/\" target=\"_blank\">https://constitutioncdn.wordpress.com/2018/04/21/supreme-court-screws-up-again/</a><br /><a href=\"https://www.minds.com/search?f=top&t=all&q=Canada\" title=\"#Canada\" class=\"u-url hashtag\" target=\"_blank\">#Canada</a>",
"to": [
"https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public"
],
"cc": [
"https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1224762086337290243/followers"
],
"tag": [],
"url": "https://www.minds.com/newsfeed/1630323228029227025",
"published": "2024-04-25T20:02:26+00:00",
"source": {
"content": "'In Case You Missed It' - from 2018:\nAnother court decision that damages Canada and is caused by flawed and illogical Constitutional ‘interpretations’ from our politicized and unaccountable Supreme Court of Canada:\n\n “Enter the Supreme Court of Canada with a decision that eviscerates any real hope that Canada will ever have what real nations such as Australia and the United States enjoy — legal protection of internal free trade...”\nhttps://constitutioncdn.wordpress.com/2018/04/21/supreme-court-screws-up-again/\n#Canada",
"mediaType": "text/plain"
}
},
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1224762086337290243/entities/urn:activity:1630323228029227025/activity"
},
{
"type": "Create",
"actor": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1224762086337290243",
"object": {
"type": "Note",
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1224762086337290243/entities/urn:activity:1629900929618677774",
"attributedTo": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1224762086337290243",
"content": "“Rather than protecting us from government overreach, the Charter is being interpreted to justify it.”<br /><a href=\"https://constitutioncdn.wordpress.com/2022/04/19/reflections-on-the-charter/\" target=\"_blank\">https://constitutioncdn.wordpress.com/2022/04/19/reflections-on-the-charter/</a><br /><a href=\"https://www.minds.com/search?f=top&t=all&q=Canada\" title=\"#Canada\" class=\"u-url hashtag\" target=\"_blank\">#Canada</a> <a href=\"https://www.minds.com/search?f=top&t=all&q=OneNationOneLaw\" title=\"#OneNationOneLaw\" class=\"u-url hashtag\" target=\"_blank\">#OneNationOneLaw</a>",
"to": [
"https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public"
],
"cc": [
"https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1224762086337290243/followers"
],
"tag": [],
"url": "https://www.minds.com/newsfeed/1629900929618677774",
"published": "2024-04-24T16:04:23+00:00",
"source": {
"content": "“Rather than protecting us from government overreach, the Charter is being interpreted to justify it.”\nhttps://constitutioncdn.wordpress.com/2022/04/19/reflections-on-the-charter/\n#Canada #OneNationOneLaw",
"mediaType": "text/plain"
}
},
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1224762086337290243/entities/urn:activity:1629900929618677774/activity"
},
{
"type": "Create",
"actor": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1224762086337290243",
"object": {
"type": "Note",
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1224762086337290243/entities/urn:activity:1626625602905706500",
"attributedTo": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1224762086337290243",
"content": "“If any institution in Canada is ripe for cancellation, it’s the Crown, and this should matter to all Canadians, irrespective of their origin. It might have made sense in 1867, when anglophone Canadians had a strong loyalty to Britain, to keep the Queen as head of state but it makes no sense today that she should rule Canadians, even nominally.”<br /><a href=\"https://constitutioncdn.wordpress.com/2024/04/15/ending-the-monarchy/\" target=\"_blank\">https://constitutioncdn.wordpress.com/2024/04/15/ending-the-monarchy/</a>",
"to": [
"https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public"
],
"cc": [
"https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1224762086337290243/followers"
],
"tag": [],
"url": "https://www.minds.com/newsfeed/1626625602905706500",
"published": "2024-04-15T15:09:24+00:00",
"attachment": [
{
"type": "Document",
"url": "https://cdn.minds.com/fs/v1/thumbnail/1626625581552504837/xlarge/",
"mediaType": "image/jpeg",
"height": 450,
"width": 800
}
],
"source": {
"content": "“If any institution in Canada is ripe for cancellation, it’s the Crown, and this should matter to all Canadians, irrespective of their origin. It might have made sense in 1867, when anglophone Canadians had a strong loyalty to Britain, to keep the Queen as head of state but it makes no sense today that she should rule Canadians, even nominally.”\nhttps://constitutioncdn.wordpress.com/2024/04/15/ending-the-monarchy/",
"mediaType": "text/plain"
}
},
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1224762086337290243/entities/urn:activity:1626625602905706500/activity"
},
{
"type": "Create",
"actor": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1224762086337290243",
"object": {
"type": "Note",
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1224762086337290243/entities/urn:activity:1477724011080192019",
"attributedTo": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1224762086337290243",
"content": "\"A national Constitution is supposed to be a set of unifying principles and rights - not a hodge-podge of regional preferences...<br /><br /> \"Quebec is basically acting ... as if it is a sovereign government and is claiming it can do whatever it wants, regardless of what's in the Canadian Constitution.\"<br /><br />“The oath of allegiance to the monarch that has long rankled Quebec sovereigntist politicians is a thing of the past after the provincial legislature passed a law abolishing the requirement for its elected members.”<br /><a href=\"https://www.minds.com/search?f=top&t=all&q=OneNationOneLaw\" title=\"#OneNationOneLaw\" class=\"u-url hashtag\" target=\"_blank\">#OneNationOneLaw</a> ",
"to": [
"https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public"
],
"cc": [
"https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1224762086337290243/followers"
],
"tag": [],
"url": "https://www.minds.com/newsfeed/1477724011080192019",
"published": "2023-03-01T17:47:38+00:00",
"attachment": [
{
"type": "Document",
"url": "https://cdn.minds.com/fs/v1/thumbnail/1477723999008985091/xlarge/",
"mediaType": "image/jpeg",
"height": 540,
"width": 800
}
],
"source": {
"content": "\"A national Constitution is supposed to be a set of unifying principles and rights - not a hodge-podge of regional preferences...\n\n \"Quebec is basically acting ... as if it is a sovereign government and is claiming it can do whatever it wants, regardless of what's in the Canadian Constitution.\"\n\n“The oath of allegiance to the monarch that has long rankled Quebec sovereigntist politicians is a thing of the past after the provincial legislature passed a law abolishing the requirement for its elected members.”\n#OneNationOneLaw ",
"mediaType": "text/plain"
}
},
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1224762086337290243/entities/urn:activity:1477724011080192019/activity"
},
{
"type": "Create",
"actor": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1224762086337290243",
"object": {
"type": "Note",
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1224762086337290243/entities/urn:activity:1477723725821382660",
"attributedTo": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1224762086337290243",
"content": "\"A national Constitution is supposed to be a set of unifying principles and rights - not a hodge-podge of regional preferences...<br /><br /> \"Quebec is basically acting ... as if it is a sovereign government and is claiming it can do whatever it wants, regardless of what's in the Canadian Constitution.\"<br /><br />“The oath of allegiance to the monarch that has long rankled Quebec sovereigntist politicians is a thing of the past after the provincial legislature passed a law abolishing the requirement for its elected members.”<br /><a href=\"https://constitutioncdn.wordpress.com/2023/03/01/quebec-unilaterally-amends-the-constitution/\" target=\"_blank\">https://constitutioncdn.wordpress.com/2023/03/01/quebec-unilaterally-amends-the-constitution/</a><br /><a href=\"https://www.minds.com/search?f=top&t=all&q=OneNationOneLaw\" title=\"#OneNationOneLaw\" class=\"u-url hashtag\" target=\"_blank\">#OneNationOneLaw</a> ",
"to": [
"https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public"
],
"cc": [
"https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1224762086337290243/followers"
],
"tag": [],
"url": "https://www.minds.com/newsfeed/1477723725821382660",
"published": "2023-03-01T17:46:30+00:00",
"source": {
"content": "\"A national Constitution is supposed to be a set of unifying principles and rights - not a hodge-podge of regional preferences...\n\n \"Quebec is basically acting ... as if it is a sovereign government and is claiming it can do whatever it wants, regardless of what's in the Canadian Constitution.\"\n\n“The oath of allegiance to the monarch that has long rankled Quebec sovereigntist politicians is a thing of the past after the provincial legislature passed a law abolishing the requirement for its elected members.”\nhttps://constitutioncdn.wordpress.com/2023/03/01/quebec-unilaterally-amends-the-constitution/\n#OneNationOneLaw ",
"mediaType": "text/plain"
}
},
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1224762086337290243/entities/urn:activity:1477723725821382660/activity"
},
{
"type": "Create",
"actor": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1224762086337290243",
"object": {
"type": "Note",
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1224762086337290243/entities/urn:activity:1471215157932724235",
"attributedTo": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1224762086337290243",
"content": "How do complete fools like this ever get to become judges?<br />And when will we get rid of this disastrous Trudeau Charter??<br /><br />“The Supreme Court of Canada ruled defendants can use self-induced extreme intoxication in their defence in circumstances of murder and sexual assault. On Friday, the court said its decision to strike down a federal law that prohibited the defence passed by Parliament in 1985 was unconstitutional and violates Canada's Charter of Rights.”<br />And<br />“You may once again kill multiple people in Canada while conceivably only serving the prison sentence for a single homicide... The Supreme Court’s reasoning was that locking up mass murderers for the rest of their natural life constituted “cruel and unusual punishment” and was thus unconstitutional.”<br /><a href=\"https://constitutioncdn.wordpress.com/2023/01/31/two-more-horrible-supreme-court-of-canada-decisions/\" target=\"_blank\">https://constitutioncdn.wordpress.com/2023/01/31/two-more-horrible-supreme-court-of-canada-decisions/</a>",
"to": [
"https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public"
],
"cc": [
"https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1224762086337290243/followers"
],
"tag": [],
"url": "https://www.minds.com/newsfeed/1471215157932724235",
"published": "2023-02-11T18:43:46+00:00",
"attachment": [
{
"type": "Document",
"url": "https://www.minds.com/fs/v1/thumbnail/1471215087153844229/xlarge/?jwtsig=eyJ0eXAiOiJKV1QiLCJhbGciOiJIUzI1NiJ9.eyJleHAiOjE3NTEzMjgwMDAsInVyaSI6Imh0dHBzOi8vd3d3Lm1pbmRzLmNvbS9mcy92MS90aHVtYm5haWwvMTQ3MTIxNTA4NzE1Mzg0NDIyOS94bGFyZ2UvIiwidXNlcl9ndWlkIjpudWxsfQ.4m6KwwWY4tkk1RLmAbm2VlREw6_eYJA2bw4jnXNaNqw",
"mediaType": "image/jpeg",
"height": 451,
"width": 800
}
],
"source": {
"content": "How do complete fools like this ever get to become judges?\nAnd when will we get rid of this disastrous Trudeau Charter??\n\n“The Supreme Court of Canada ruled defendants can use self-induced extreme intoxication in their defence in circumstances of murder and sexual assault. On Friday, the court said its decision to strike down a federal law that prohibited the defence passed by Parliament in 1985 was unconstitutional and violates Canada's Charter of Rights.”\nAnd\n“You may once again kill multiple people in Canada while conceivably only serving the prison sentence for a single homicide... The Supreme Court’s reasoning was that locking up mass murderers for the rest of their natural life constituted “cruel and unusual punishment” and was thus unconstitutional.”\nhttps://constitutioncdn.wordpress.com/2023/01/31/two-more-horrible-supreme-court-of-canada-decisions/",
"mediaType": "text/plain"
}
},
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1224762086337290243/entities/urn:activity:1471215157932724235/activity"
},
{
"type": "Create",
"actor": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1224762086337290243",
"object": {
"type": "Note",
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1224762086337290243/entities/urn:activity:1467273244653391883",
"attributedTo": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1224762086337290243",
"content": "How do complete fools like this ever get to become judges? <br />And when will we get rid of this disastrous Trudeau Charter??<br /> “The Supreme Court of Canada ruled defendants can use self-induced extreme intoxication in their defence in circumstances of murder and sexual assault. On Friday, the court said its decision to strike down a federal law that prohibited the defence passed by Parliament in 1985 was unconstitutional and violates Canada's Charter of Rights.”<br />And<br /> “You may once again kill multiple people in Canada while conceivably only serving the prison sentence for a single homicide... The Supreme Court’s reasoning was that locking up mass murderers for the rest of their natural life constituted “cruel and unusual punishment” and was thus unconstitutional.”<br /><a href=\"https://constitutioncdn.wordpress.com/2023/01/31/two-more-horrible-supreme-court-of-canada-decisions/\" target=\"_blank\">https://constitutioncdn.wordpress.com/2023/01/31/two-more-horrible-supreme-court-of-canada-decisions/</a>",
"to": [
"https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public"
],
"cc": [
"https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1224762086337290243/followers"
],
"tag": [],
"url": "https://www.minds.com/newsfeed/1467273244653391883",
"published": "2023-01-31T21:40:01+00:00",
"attachment": [
{
"type": "Document",
"url": "https://cdn.minds.com/fs/v1/thumbnail/1467273206812381202/xlarge/",
"mediaType": "image/jpeg",
"height": 451,
"width": 800
}
],
"source": {
"content": "How do complete fools like this ever get to become judges? \nAnd when will we get rid of this disastrous Trudeau Charter??\n “The Supreme Court of Canada ruled defendants can use self-induced extreme intoxication in their defence in circumstances of murder and sexual assault. On Friday, the court said its decision to strike down a federal law that prohibited the defence passed by Parliament in 1985 was unconstitutional and violates Canada's Charter of Rights.”\nAnd\n “You may once again kill multiple people in Canada while conceivably only serving the prison sentence for a single homicide... The Supreme Court’s reasoning was that locking up mass murderers for the rest of their natural life constituted “cruel and unusual punishment” and was thus unconstitutional.”\nhttps://constitutioncdn.wordpress.com/2023/01/31/two-more-horrible-supreme-court-of-canada-decisions/",
"mediaType": "text/plain"
}
},
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1224762086337290243/entities/urn:activity:1467273244653391883/activity"
},
{
"type": "Create",
"actor": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1224762086337290243",
"object": {
"type": "Note",
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1224762086337290243/entities/urn:activity:1428117011375853583",
"attributedTo": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1224762086337290243",
"content": "When President Trump was making U.S. Supreme Court appointments, media – including Canadian – made a loud fuss about ‘stacking the court’. Trudeau is doing the same thing in Canada and no one cares...<br /><br /> “Neither her career nor her thinking come close to qualifying her for the Supreme Court of Canada. Her appointment is transparently political. It does a disservice to the court that will have to welcome her, and to the rule of law in Canada.”<br /><br />“Prime Minister Justin Trudeau announced Friday his nomination of Michelle O'Bonsawin to the Supreme Court of Canada. She will become the first ‘Indigenous’ {sic} person to serve on Canada's highest court...”<br />{Canadian Aboriginals are ‘Indigenous’ to Siberia and Mongolia...}<br /><a href=\"https://constitutioncdn.wordpress.com/2022/10/15/stacking-the-supreme-court/\" target=\"_blank\">https://constitutioncdn.wordpress.com/2022/10/15/stacking-the-supreme-court/</a>",
"to": [
"https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public"
],
"cc": [
"https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1224762086337290243/followers"
],
"tag": [],
"url": "https://www.minds.com/newsfeed/1428117011375853583",
"published": "2022-10-15T20:27:08+00:00",
"attachment": [
{
"type": "Document",
"url": "https://cdn.minds.com/fs/v1/thumbnail/1428116993730416658/xlarge/",
"mediaType": "image/jpeg",
"height": 339,
"width": 600
}
],
"source": {
"content": "When President Trump was making U.S. Supreme Court appointments, media – including Canadian – made a loud fuss about ‘stacking the court’. Trudeau is doing the same thing in Canada and no one cares...\n\n “Neither her career nor her thinking come close to qualifying her for the Supreme Court of Canada. Her appointment is transparently political. It does a disservice to the court that will have to welcome her, and to the rule of law in Canada.”\n\n“Prime Minister Justin Trudeau announced Friday his nomination of Michelle O'Bonsawin to the Supreme Court of Canada. She will become the first ‘Indigenous’ {sic} person to serve on Canada's highest court...”\n{Canadian Aboriginals are ‘Indigenous’ to Siberia and Mongolia...}\nhttps://constitutioncdn.wordpress.com/2022/10/15/stacking-the-supreme-court/",
"mediaType": "text/plain"
}
},
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1224762086337290243/entities/urn:activity:1428117011375853583/activity"
},
{
"type": "Create",
"actor": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1224762086337290243",
"object": {
"type": "Note",
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1224762086337290243/entities/urn:activity:1422006717905899525",
"attributedTo": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1224762086337290243",
"content": "“Rather than protecting us from government overreach, the Charter is being interpreted to justify it.”<br /><a href=\"https://constitutioncdn.wordpress.com/2022/04/19/reflections-on-the-charter/\" target=\"_blank\">https://constitutioncdn.wordpress.com/2022/04/19/reflections-on-the-charter/</a>",
"to": [
"https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public"
],
"cc": [
"https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1224762086337290243/followers"
],
"tag": [],
"url": "https://www.minds.com/newsfeed/1422006717905899525",
"published": "2022-09-28T23:47:00+00:00",
"attachment": [
{
"type": "Document",
"url": "https://cdn.minds.com/fs/v1/thumbnail/1422006701611028495/xlarge/",
"mediaType": "image/jpeg",
"height": 420,
"width": 600
}
],
"source": {
"content": "“Rather than protecting us from government overreach, the Charter is being interpreted to justify it.”\nhttps://constitutioncdn.wordpress.com/2022/04/19/reflections-on-the-charter/",
"mediaType": "text/plain"
}
},
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1224762086337290243/entities/urn:activity:1422006717905899525/activity"
}
],
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1224762086337290243/outbox",
"partOf": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1224762086337290243/outboxoutbox"
}