A small tool to view real-world ActivityPub objects as JSON! Enter a URL
or username from Mastodon or a similar service below, and we'll send a
request with
the right
Accept
header
to the server to view the underlying object.
{
"@context": "https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams",
"type": "OrderedCollectionPage",
"orderedItems": [
{
"type": "Create",
"actor": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1198310223920504852",
"object": {
"type": "Note",
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1198310223920504852/entities/urn:activity:1705975006468509703",
"attributedTo": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1198310223920504852",
"content": "I talked with Loribeth Ford Jarrell, the director of Sumplicity Math, a mathematics enrichment program for children. <br /><br />We discussed working with the neural characteristics & firing patterns of individual children, education going modular, the microschool movement vs supplementary education, tutorial services, individual assessment, 10 vector dials, Jim’s education in proving the teacher wrong, identifying Jim’s learning profile, why education should belong to the child, the 10-frame dot model, dumb approaches in basic math education, long consolidators, phases of learning, the one-room schoolhouse model, types of readers, the neurological paths of reading, cognitive advantages of Arabic numerals, the nastiness of long division, how to deliver a bespoke learning trajectory, de-professionalizing math education, demonstrating that math is beautiful, counter-movements in education, supporting parents, and much more.<br /><a href=\"https://www.jimruttshow.com/loribeth-ford-jarrell/\" target=\"_blank\">https://www.jimruttshow.com/loribeth-ford-jarrell/</a>",
"to": [
"https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public"
],
"cc": [
"https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1198310223920504852/followers"
],
"tag": [],
"url": "https://www.minds.com/newsfeed/1705975006468509703",
"published": "2024-11-20T14:15:36+00:00",
"source": {
"content": "I talked with Loribeth Ford Jarrell, the director of Sumplicity Math, a mathematics enrichment program for children. \n\nWe discussed working with the neural characteristics & firing patterns of individual children, education going modular, the microschool movement vs supplementary education, tutorial services, individual assessment, 10 vector dials, Jim’s education in proving the teacher wrong, identifying Jim’s learning profile, why education should belong to the child, the 10-frame dot model, dumb approaches in basic math education, long consolidators, phases of learning, the one-room schoolhouse model, types of readers, the neurological paths of reading, cognitive advantages of Arabic numerals, the nastiness of long division, how to deliver a bespoke learning trajectory, de-professionalizing math education, demonstrating that math is beautiful, counter-movements in education, supporting parents, and much more.\nhttps://www.jimruttshow.com/loribeth-ford-jarrell/",
"mediaType": "text/plain"
}
},
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1198310223920504852/entities/urn:activity:1705975006468509703/activity"
},
{
"type": "Create",
"actor": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1198310223920504852",
"object": {
"type": "Note",
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1198310223920504852/entities/urn:activity:1700890495242211342",
"attributedTo": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1198310223920504852",
"content": "I talked with Lorraine Besser about the ideas in her book *The Art of the Interesting: What We Miss in the Pursuit of the Good Life and How to Cultivate It.*<br /><br />We discussed the turning point in Lorraine’s life that inspired the book, the meaning of the good life, pleasure vs eudaimonia, Stoicism & Epicureanism, unstructured cognitive engagement, the interesting, Seinfeld‘s relationship to happiness, problems with the pursuit of pleasure & meaning, the arrival fallacy, saints vs human beings, psychological richness, pursuit mode, Neal Cassady of the Beats, high dimensionality, the show Somebody Somewhere, tips for developing an interesting mindset, how much to go into the danger zone, the value of friendship, interesting vs moral, and much more.<br /><a href=\"https://www.jimruttshow.com/lorraine-besser\" target=\"_blank\">https://www.jimruttshow.com/lorraine-besser</a>",
"to": [
"https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public"
],
"cc": [
"https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1198310223920504852/followers"
],
"tag": [],
"url": "https://www.minds.com/newsfeed/1700890495242211342",
"published": "2024-11-06T13:31:34+00:00",
"source": {
"content": "I talked with Lorraine Besser about the ideas in her book *The Art of the Interesting: What We Miss in the Pursuit of the Good Life and How to Cultivate It.*\n\nWe discussed the turning point in Lorraine’s life that inspired the book, the meaning of the good life, pleasure vs eudaimonia, Stoicism & Epicureanism, unstructured cognitive engagement, the interesting, Seinfeld‘s relationship to happiness, problems with the pursuit of pleasure & meaning, the arrival fallacy, saints vs human beings, psychological richness, pursuit mode, Neal Cassady of the Beats, high dimensionality, the show Somebody Somewhere, tips for developing an interesting mindset, how much to go into the danger zone, the value of friendship, interesting vs moral, and much more.\nhttps://www.jimruttshow.com/lorraine-besser",
"mediaType": "text/plain"
}
},
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1198310223920504852/entities/urn:activity:1700890495242211342/activity"
},
{
"type": "Create",
"actor": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1198310223920504852",
"object": {
"type": "Note",
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1198310223920504852/entities/urn:activity:1698700081986801677",
"attributedTo": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1198310223920504852",
"content": "I talked with Nancy Jacobson, the founder and CEO of the No Labels political organization, in the last of four conversations featuring non-partisan thinkers on the upcoming US presidential election. <br /><br />We discussed No Labels’s mission, the Problem Solvers Caucus, the common sense platform, the quality of No Labels volunteers, the power of party leaders, issues with the current parties, Nancy’s vote for the 2024 election, what’s next for No Labels, and more.<br /><a href=\"https://www.jimruttshow.com/nancy-jacobson\" target=\"_blank\">https://www.jimruttshow.com/nancy-jacobson</a>",
"to": [
"https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public"
],
"cc": [
"https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1198310223920504852/followers"
],
"tag": [],
"url": "https://www.minds.com/newsfeed/1698700081986801677",
"published": "2024-10-31T12:27:39+00:00",
"source": {
"content": "I talked with Nancy Jacobson, the founder and CEO of the No Labels political organization, in the last of four conversations featuring non-partisan thinkers on the upcoming US presidential election. \n\nWe discussed No Labels’s mission, the Problem Solvers Caucus, the common sense platform, the quality of No Labels volunteers, the power of party leaders, issues with the current parties, Nancy’s vote for the 2024 election, what’s next for No Labels, and more.\nhttps://www.jimruttshow.com/nancy-jacobson",
"mediaType": "text/plain"
}
},
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1198310223920504852/entities/urn:activity:1698700081986801677/activity"
},
{
"type": "Create",
"actor": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1198310223920504852",
"object": {
"type": "Note",
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1198310223920504852/entities/urn:activity:1698340897453772816",
"attributedTo": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1198310223920504852",
"content": "I talked with Alex Ebert about his recent essay “Suboptimal Revolution: In Defense of Inefficiencies.” <br /><br />We discussed what optimization does, genius vs democracy, negating the spatiotemporal experience of becoming a master, the decision-by-committee problem, intrinsic vs extrinsic motivation, dimensional collapse, the app Shazam, what happened to movies, preferred energetic states & the feat of problematizing, status burning, audience capture, the signature of a medium, the human ability to spot good bad things, cognitive sovereignty, the allure of inertia, fighting back against entropy, a million years to do cool stuff in the universe, suboptimal tech, constraints, natural implicit hierarchies, tying effort to sovereignty, and much more.<br /><a href=\"https://www.jimruttshow.com/alex-ebert\" target=\"_blank\">https://www.jimruttshow.com/alex-ebert</a>",
"to": [
"https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public"
],
"cc": [
"https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1198310223920504852/followers"
],
"tag": [],
"url": "https://www.minds.com/newsfeed/1698340897453772816",
"published": "2024-10-30T12:40:23+00:00",
"source": {
"content": "I talked with Alex Ebert about his recent essay “Suboptimal Revolution: In Defense of Inefficiencies.” \n\nWe discussed what optimization does, genius vs democracy, negating the spatiotemporal experience of becoming a master, the decision-by-committee problem, intrinsic vs extrinsic motivation, dimensional collapse, the app Shazam, what happened to movies, preferred energetic states & the feat of problematizing, status burning, audience capture, the signature of a medium, the human ability to spot good bad things, cognitive sovereignty, the allure of inertia, fighting back against entropy, a million years to do cool stuff in the universe, suboptimal tech, constraints, natural implicit hierarchies, tying effort to sovereignty, and much more.\nhttps://www.jimruttshow.com/alex-ebert",
"mediaType": "text/plain"
}
},
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1198310223920504852/entities/urn:activity:1698340897453772816/activity"
},
{
"type": "Create",
"actor": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1198310223920504852",
"object": {
"type": "Note",
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1198310223920504852/entities/urn:activity:1696530982418518024",
"attributedTo": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1198310223920504852",
"content": "I talked with Brendan Graham Dempsey about the ideas in his new book, *The Evolution of Meaning: A Universal Learning Process.*<br /><br />We discussed my love for the book, the thinking behind the title, future books in the series, why Brendan avoided the word “religion,” the nature of meaning, dissipative systems, Shannon information vs semantic information, relations vs static objects, meaning as adaptive information, the meaning of value, Gregg Henriques’s Unified Theory of Knowledge, the meaning of learning, why the world is full of bogus learning, whether complexity increases over time, information overload, John Vervaeke’s relevance realization, wisdom, evolution as learning, the meaning & evolution of sacredness, and much more.<br /><a href=\"https://www.jimruttshow.com/brendan-graham-dempsey-2/\" target=\"_blank\">https://www.jimruttshow.com/brendan-graham-dempsey-2/</a>",
"to": [
"https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public"
],
"cc": [
"https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1198310223920504852/followers"
],
"tag": [],
"url": "https://www.minds.com/newsfeed/1696530982418518024",
"published": "2024-10-25T12:48:25+00:00",
"source": {
"content": "I talked with Brendan Graham Dempsey about the ideas in his new book, *The Evolution of Meaning: A Universal Learning Process.*\n\nWe discussed my love for the book, the thinking behind the title, future books in the series, why Brendan avoided the word “religion,” the nature of meaning, dissipative systems, Shannon information vs semantic information, relations vs static objects, meaning as adaptive information, the meaning of value, Gregg Henriques’s Unified Theory of Knowledge, the meaning of learning, why the world is full of bogus learning, whether complexity increases over time, information overload, John Vervaeke’s relevance realization, wisdom, evolution as learning, the meaning & evolution of sacredness, and much more.\nhttps://www.jimruttshow.com/brendan-graham-dempsey-2/",
"mediaType": "text/plain"
}
},
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1198310223920504852/entities/urn:activity:1696530982418518024/activity"
},
{
"type": "Create",
"actor": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1198310223920504852",
"object": {
"type": "Note",
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1198310223920504852/entities/urn:activity:1696166290676256780",
"attributedTo": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1198310223920504852",
"content": "I talked with Richard Hanania in the third of four interviews with heterodox political thinkers on the upcoming US presidential election. <br /><br />We discussed the danger of “heterodox orthodoxy,” Trump’s election denial, disagreeing with the Democrats on policy, my critiques of both parties, religion’s impact on policy, Republicans as the party of low human capital, the idea of Trump derangement syndrome, the number of people who served under Trump who are not supporting him, guardrails against overthrowing the election, the likelihood that Trump wins, the apparent swing toward Trump among young men, and much more.<br /><a href=\"https://www.jimruttshow.com/richard-hanania\" target=\"_blank\">https://www.jimruttshow.com/richard-hanania</a>",
"to": [
"https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public"
],
"cc": [
"https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1198310223920504852/followers"
],
"tag": [],
"url": "https://www.minds.com/newsfeed/1696166290676256780",
"published": "2024-10-24T12:39:16+00:00",
"source": {
"content": "I talked with Richard Hanania in the third of four interviews with heterodox political thinkers on the upcoming US presidential election. \n\nWe discussed the danger of “heterodox orthodoxy,” Trump’s election denial, disagreeing with the Democrats on policy, my critiques of both parties, religion’s impact on policy, Republicans as the party of low human capital, the idea of Trump derangement syndrome, the number of people who served under Trump who are not supporting him, guardrails against overthrowing the election, the likelihood that Trump wins, the apparent swing toward Trump among young men, and much more.\nhttps://www.jimruttshow.com/richard-hanania",
"mediaType": "text/plain"
}
},
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1198310223920504852/entities/urn:activity:1696166290676256780/activity"
},
{
"type": "Create",
"actor": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1198310223920504852",
"object": {
"type": "Note",
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1198310223920504852/entities/urn:activity:1695791515298697234",
"attributedTo": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1198310223920504852",
"content": "I talked with Marcia Gralha about her and Gregg Henriques’s work identifying the common core of psychotherapeutic traditions. <br /><br />We discussed her collaboration with & recent engagement to Gregg, framing psychotherapy, the enlightenment gap, the development of eclecticism, common factors between approaches, the integration movement, approaches to integration, the 3(+1) elements of the Common Core, the quality of the therapeutic bond, cultural legitimization, choosing interventions, rituals, the Unified Theory of Knowledge (UTOK), disentangling confusions in terms, the persona filter, person-centered therapy, the neurotic loop, character adaptation systems, cognitive therapy & cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT), wokeism in academia, a sexual harassment complaint, woke 1.0 vs 2.0, the ability to deal with strong stuff, and much more.<br /><a href=\"https://www.jimruttshow.com/marcia-gralha/\" target=\"_blank\">https://www.jimruttshow.com/marcia-gralha/</a>",
"to": [
"https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public"
],
"cc": [
"https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1198310223920504852/followers"
],
"tag": [],
"url": "https://www.minds.com/newsfeed/1695791515298697234",
"published": "2024-10-23T11:50:03+00:00",
"source": {
"content": "I talked with Marcia Gralha about her and Gregg Henriques’s work identifying the common core of psychotherapeutic traditions. \n\nWe discussed her collaboration with & recent engagement to Gregg, framing psychotherapy, the enlightenment gap, the development of eclecticism, common factors between approaches, the integration movement, approaches to integration, the 3(+1) elements of the Common Core, the quality of the therapeutic bond, cultural legitimization, choosing interventions, rituals, the Unified Theory of Knowledge (UTOK), disentangling confusions in terms, the persona filter, person-centered therapy, the neurotic loop, character adaptation systems, cognitive therapy & cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT), wokeism in academia, a sexual harassment complaint, woke 1.0 vs 2.0, the ability to deal with strong stuff, and much more.\nhttps://www.jimruttshow.com/marcia-gralha/",
"mediaType": "text/plain"
}
},
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1198310223920504852/entities/urn:activity:1695791515298697234/activity"
},
{
"type": "Create",
"actor": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1198310223920504852",
"object": {
"type": "Note",
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1198310223920504852/entities/urn:activity:1693979983883538448",
"attributedTo": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1198310223920504852",
"content": "I talked with Aravind Srinivas, co-founder and CEO of the AI-powered search engine Perplexity. <br /><br />We discussed my use of Perplexity, its wide range of use cases, why Google search is limited by fear of mistakes, retrieval-augmented generation (RAG), citations, coming up with the idea, leveraging existing tools vs inventing everything, the core product experience, how the orchestration engine works, semantic vector databases, testing Perplexity as a hedge fund strategist, the Perplexity API, Perplexity’s moat, maintaining cognitive sovereignty, paid tiers, what the company needs to succeed, having individuals as major investors, debunking rumors of acquisition by NVIDIA, affordances for coders, and much more.<br /><a href=\"https://www.jimruttshow.com/aravind-srinivas\" target=\"_blank\">https://www.jimruttshow.com/aravind-srinivas</a>",
"to": [
"https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public"
],
"cc": [
"https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1198310223920504852/followers"
],
"tag": [],
"url": "https://www.minds.com/newsfeed/1693979983883538448",
"published": "2024-10-18T11:51:40+00:00",
"source": {
"content": "I talked with Aravind Srinivas, co-founder and CEO of the AI-powered search engine Perplexity. \n\nWe discussed my use of Perplexity, its wide range of use cases, why Google search is limited by fear of mistakes, retrieval-augmented generation (RAG), citations, coming up with the idea, leveraging existing tools vs inventing everything, the core product experience, how the orchestration engine works, semantic vector databases, testing Perplexity as a hedge fund strategist, the Perplexity API, Perplexity’s moat, maintaining cognitive sovereignty, paid tiers, what the company needs to succeed, having individuals as major investors, debunking rumors of acquisition by NVIDIA, affordances for coders, and much more.\nhttps://www.jimruttshow.com/aravind-srinivas",
"mediaType": "text/plain"
}
},
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1198310223920504852/entities/urn:activity:1693979983883538448/activity"
},
{
"type": "Create",
"actor": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1198310223920504852",
"object": {
"type": "Note",
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1198310223920504852/entities/urn:activity:1692534942300377104",
"attributedTo": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1198310223920504852",
"content": "I talked with Bret Weinstein in the second of four episodes featuring heterodox political thinkers on the 2024 presidential election. <br /><br />We discussed Bret’s historical voting principles & why they don’t apply this time, election interference, what actually happened with Biden’s failed debate, current polling & apparent desperation of the Democrats, the long trajectory of feminism & its relationship to the current Democratic party, defections by men, a massive political realignment, hating both teams, voting against the status quo regime, the demographic shift in party alignment, a bias in courage towards religious worldviews, removal from the World Health Organization, understanding the failure of government institutions in Covid, Ukraine aid as a looting mechanism, global warming & solar forcing, the Carrington effect & the migration of Earth’s magnetic poles, Trump’s narcissism & its effects on decision-making, defeating the duopoly, deliberating until the last minute, and much more.<br /><a href=\"https://www.jimruttshow.com/bret-weinstein-2/\" target=\"_blank\">https://www.jimruttshow.com/bret-weinstein-2/</a>",
"to": [
"https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public"
],
"cc": [
"https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1198310223920504852/followers"
],
"tag": [],
"url": "https://www.minds.com/newsfeed/1692534942300377104",
"published": "2024-10-14T12:09:35+00:00",
"source": {
"content": "I talked with Bret Weinstein in the second of four episodes featuring heterodox political thinkers on the 2024 presidential election. \n\nWe discussed Bret’s historical voting principles & why they don’t apply this time, election interference, what actually happened with Biden’s failed debate, current polling & apparent desperation of the Democrats, the long trajectory of feminism & its relationship to the current Democratic party, defections by men, a massive political realignment, hating both teams, voting against the status quo regime, the demographic shift in party alignment, a bias in courage towards religious worldviews, removal from the World Health Organization, understanding the failure of government institutions in Covid, Ukraine aid as a looting mechanism, global warming & solar forcing, the Carrington effect & the migration of Earth’s magnetic poles, Trump’s narcissism & its effects on decision-making, defeating the duopoly, deliberating until the last minute, and much more.\nhttps://www.jimruttshow.com/bret-weinstein-2/",
"mediaType": "text/plain"
}
},
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1198310223920504852/entities/urn:activity:1692534942300377104/activity"
},
{
"type": "Create",
"actor": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1198310223920504852",
"object": {
"type": "Note",
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1198310223920504852/entities/urn:activity:1691086784148017158",
"attributedTo": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1198310223920504852",
"content": "I talked with Evan McMullen about the state of self-driving car technology, with a special focus on simulators. <br /><br />We discussed the purpose of simulators, levels of simulation, how the world is modeled, gradually ramping up the complexity of the testing world, Tesla’s approach, hardware-in-the-loop testing, Waymo’s first-mover advantage, simulating the availability of a human intervener, driverless solutions vs driver aid, simultaneous localization and mapping (SLAM), the question of which theories of ethics to use, international standards for functional safety, a liability shield equilibrium, tool-sharing between companies, open source simulators, NVIDIA’s DRIVE Sim & other players, standards for interoperability, incentives for cooperation between companies, hardware accuracy, edge case generation, evaluating current offerings for consumers, vibrational tactile feedback vs heads-up displays, when we’ll be able to read a book in self-driving car, and much more.<br /><a href=\"https://www.jimruttshow.com/evan-mcmullen\" target=\"_blank\">https://www.jimruttshow.com/evan-mcmullen</a>",
"to": [
"https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public"
],
"cc": [
"https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1198310223920504852/followers"
],
"tag": [],
"url": "https://www.minds.com/newsfeed/1691086784148017158",
"published": "2024-10-10T12:15:07+00:00",
"source": {
"content": "I talked with Evan McMullen about the state of self-driving car technology, with a special focus on simulators. \n\nWe discussed the purpose of simulators, levels of simulation, how the world is modeled, gradually ramping up the complexity of the testing world, Tesla’s approach, hardware-in-the-loop testing, Waymo’s first-mover advantage, simulating the availability of a human intervener, driverless solutions vs driver aid, simultaneous localization and mapping (SLAM), the question of which theories of ethics to use, international standards for functional safety, a liability shield equilibrium, tool-sharing between companies, open source simulators, NVIDIA’s DRIVE Sim & other players, standards for interoperability, incentives for cooperation between companies, hardware accuracy, edge case generation, evaluating current offerings for consumers, vibrational tactile feedback vs heads-up displays, when we’ll be able to read a book in self-driving car, and much more.\nhttps://www.jimruttshow.com/evan-mcmullen",
"mediaType": "text/plain"
}
},
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1198310223920504852/entities/urn:activity:1691086784148017158/activity"
},
{
"type": "Create",
"actor": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1198310223920504852",
"object": {
"type": "Note",
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1198310223920504852/entities/urn:activity:1690003959185412115",
"attributedTo": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1198310223920504852",
"content": "I talked with Cliff Maloney about the November election and his get-out-the-vote campaign, The Pennsylvania Chase.<br /><br />We discussed Cliff‘s libertarian background, why Pennsylvania is a crucial state, a Republican return to grassroots, the structure of the operation, the effectiveness of door-knocking, choosing the highest-impact doors to knock on, why Cliff is helping the Republicans, my political trajectory, oikophobia, why I find Trump intolerable, Cliff‘s political background, working for Ron Paul, the loss of the anti-war left, Trump’s gut instinct, Trump’s deficit record, comparing the foreign policy of Nikki Haley & John McCain, hurricane relief & Ukraine relief, whether support for Ukraine is a good investment, the drug war, returning abortion rights to the states, transgender surgeries for kids, luxury beliefs, Christian nationalism in the Republican Party, woke ideology vs the nuclear family, the unsustainability of American public education, teacher’s unions, politics as the adjudication of power, the importance of open disagreements, Thomas Massie, and much more.<br /><a href=\"https://www.jimruttshow.com/cliff-maloney\" target=\"_blank\">https://www.jimruttshow.com/cliff-maloney</a>",
"to": [
"https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public"
],
"cc": [
"https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1198310223920504852/followers"
],
"tag": [],
"url": "https://www.minds.com/newsfeed/1690003959185412115",
"published": "2024-10-07T12:32:22+00:00",
"source": {
"content": "I talked with Cliff Maloney about the November election and his get-out-the-vote campaign, The Pennsylvania Chase.\n\nWe discussed Cliff‘s libertarian background, why Pennsylvania is a crucial state, a Republican return to grassroots, the structure of the operation, the effectiveness of door-knocking, choosing the highest-impact doors to knock on, why Cliff is helping the Republicans, my political trajectory, oikophobia, why I find Trump intolerable, Cliff‘s political background, working for Ron Paul, the loss of the anti-war left, Trump’s gut instinct, Trump’s deficit record, comparing the foreign policy of Nikki Haley & John McCain, hurricane relief & Ukraine relief, whether support for Ukraine is a good investment, the drug war, returning abortion rights to the states, transgender surgeries for kids, luxury beliefs, Christian nationalism in the Republican Party, woke ideology vs the nuclear family, the unsustainability of American public education, teacher’s unions, politics as the adjudication of power, the importance of open disagreements, Thomas Massie, and much more.\nhttps://www.jimruttshow.com/cliff-maloney",
"mediaType": "text/plain"
}
},
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1198310223920504852/entities/urn:activity:1690003959185412115/activity"
},
{
"type": "Create",
"actor": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1198310223920504852",
"object": {
"type": "Note",
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1198310223920504852/entities/urn:activity:1688928290254884869",
"attributedTo": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1198310223920504852",
"content": "I talked with Nikos Salingaros about architectural theory, urbanism, and urban planning. <br /><br />We discussed inherited knowledge, the capability to distinguish between ugly & beautiful buildings, John Vervaeke’s 4 kinds of knowing, vertical vs horizontal design, how architecture went so wrong, backward evolution, a Messianic futurism cult, the destruction of living geometry, how the real estate racket works, biophilic design, the correlation between modern architecture & modern art, the human scale, James Gibson, the Fibonacci sequence, deconstructivism, architectural assassins, fractals in architecture, richness, interpretability, medical health, functional ornamentation, information overload, cultural continuity & erasure, the ruse of postmodernism, algorithmic design, the AI revolution in architecture, an opportunity for new entrants, wonderful modern buildings, failed typologies, urban planning, making several systems work together simultaneously, autopoietic systems, urban DNA, Jane Jacobs, the city as a living system, post-war zoning, peer-to-peer urbanism, why it hasn’t worked, the “yes in my backyard” movement, the future of architecture, and much more.<br /><a href=\"https://www.jimruttshow.com/nikos-salingaros\" target=\"_blank\">https://www.jimruttshow.com/nikos-salingaros</a>",
"to": [
"https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public"
],
"cc": [
"https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1198310223920504852/followers"
],
"tag": [],
"url": "https://www.minds.com/newsfeed/1688928290254884869",
"published": "2024-10-04T13:18:02+00:00",
"source": {
"content": "I talked with Nikos Salingaros about architectural theory, urbanism, and urban planning. \n\nWe discussed inherited knowledge, the capability to distinguish between ugly & beautiful buildings, John Vervaeke’s 4 kinds of knowing, vertical vs horizontal design, how architecture went so wrong, backward evolution, a Messianic futurism cult, the destruction of living geometry, how the real estate racket works, biophilic design, the correlation between modern architecture & modern art, the human scale, James Gibson, the Fibonacci sequence, deconstructivism, architectural assassins, fractals in architecture, richness, interpretability, medical health, functional ornamentation, information overload, cultural continuity & erasure, the ruse of postmodernism, algorithmic design, the AI revolution in architecture, an opportunity for new entrants, wonderful modern buildings, failed typologies, urban planning, making several systems work together simultaneously, autopoietic systems, urban DNA, Jane Jacobs, the city as a living system, post-war zoning, peer-to-peer urbanism, why it hasn’t worked, the “yes in my backyard” movement, the future of architecture, and much more.\nhttps://www.jimruttshow.com/nikos-salingaros",
"mediaType": "text/plain"
}
},
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1198310223920504852/entities/urn:activity:1688928290254884869/activity"
},
{
"type": "Create",
"actor": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1198310223920504852",
"object": {
"type": "Note",
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1198310223920504852/entities/urn:activity:1688197702061395970",
"attributedTo": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1198310223920504852",
"content": "I talked with Ben Goertzel and Trent McConaghy about the merger of Ben’s SingularityNET AGIX token, Trent’s Ocean Protocol, and Fetch.<br /><br />We discussed the relative size of the merger, motivations for pulling together the three networks, distinguishing this from a standard corporate merger, how the communities of the projects reacted, leveraging the benefits of scale, changing the ticker symbol, defining AGI vs ASI, forecasts on AGI, considering the arc of self-driving cars, data bottlenecks, the likely shape of superintelligence, what the 3 organizations do, autonomous economic agents, AI creativity, the amount of work happening on crypto networks, the antifragility of crypto, why AGI/ASI emerging from these networks might be plausible, making something work without understanding it, and much more.<br /><a href=\"https://www.jimruttshow.com/ben-goertzel-trent-mcconaghy/\" target=\"_blank\">https://www.jimruttshow.com/ben-goertzel-trent-mcconaghy/</a>",
"to": [
"https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public"
],
"cc": [
"https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1198310223920504852/followers"
],
"tag": [],
"url": "https://www.minds.com/newsfeed/1688197702061395970",
"published": "2024-10-02T12:54:56+00:00",
"source": {
"content": "I talked with Ben Goertzel and Trent McConaghy about the merger of Ben’s SingularityNET AGIX token, Trent’s Ocean Protocol, and Fetch.\n\nWe discussed the relative size of the merger, motivations for pulling together the three networks, distinguishing this from a standard corporate merger, how the communities of the projects reacted, leveraging the benefits of scale, changing the ticker symbol, defining AGI vs ASI, forecasts on AGI, considering the arc of self-driving cars, data bottlenecks, the likely shape of superintelligence, what the 3 organizations do, autonomous economic agents, AI creativity, the amount of work happening on crypto networks, the antifragility of crypto, why AGI/ASI emerging from these networks might be plausible, making something work without understanding it, and much more.\nhttps://www.jimruttshow.com/ben-goertzel-trent-mcconaghy/",
"mediaType": "text/plain"
}
},
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1198310223920504852/entities/urn:activity:1688197702061395970/activity"
}
],
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1198310223920504852/outbox",
"partOf": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1198310223920504852/outboxoutbox"
}