A small tool to view real-world ActivityPub objects as JSON! Enter a URL
or username from Mastodon or a similar service below, and we'll send a
request with
the right
Accept
header
to the server to view the underlying object.
{
"@context": "https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams",
"type": "OrderedCollectionPage",
"orderedItems": [
{
"type": "Create",
"actor": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1197308644404764673",
"object": {
"type": "Note",
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1197308644404764673/entities/urn:activity:1320677726155182094",
"attributedTo": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1197308644404764673",
"content": "А что, все отсюда срыли нафиг?",
"to": [
"https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public"
],
"cc": [
"https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1197308644404764673/followers"
],
"tag": [],
"url": "https://www.minds.com/newsfeed/1320677726155182094",
"published": "2021-12-23T09:01:46+00:00",
"source": {
"content": "А что, все отсюда срыли нафиг?",
"mediaType": "text/plain"
}
},
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1197308644404764673/entities/urn:activity:1320677726155182094/activity"
},
{
"type": "Announce",
"actor": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1197308644404764673",
"object": {
"type": "Note",
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/458785439046705152/entities/urn:activity:1233765594204397568",
"attributedTo": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/458785439046705152",
"content": "Hi. Most likely I don’t know you, but I want to ask you for one thing. It’s about the new Minds policies.<br /><br />Please keep silent on Minds for 24 hours starting from 00:01 AM this Wednesday, April 28, 2021 (your local time). <br /><br />Or, if you first see this post later this week, from the hour you see it. Don’t post, don’t upvote. Don’t remind. Don’t interact on Minds in any way for 24 hours.<br /><br />Here’s why:<br /><br />TL;DR The Minds administration behaves erratically, moving the goalposts. We should let them know we don't like it before Minds gets broken.<br /><br />It's not about tokens, but it starts with them. <br /><br />One of the biggest <a class=\"u-url mention\" href=\"https://www.minds.com/Minds\" target=\"_blank\">@Minds</a> selling points has been tokens. Minds lured new users with promises of tokens and of the wonderful things users would be able to do with them. <br /><br />On March 16, 2021, dreams became true: users could now earn money just by holding tokens on-chain and providing liquidity.<br /><br />But about a week before that, another change happened. Quietly, unannounced. Minds users suddenly couldn’t use tokens to pay for Minds+ anymore. <br /><br />That was a huge change – many users had been earning tokens with exactly that purpose. Now this possibility was quietly taken away. <br /><br />More than that – as it turned out, the new token benefits promised to everyone were made available only to those who paid for Minds+ with US$. Thus, Minds divided its users into two classes: the privileged, and the rest.<br /><br />On April 22, even worse thing happened. Minds announced that from now on, the votes of those who didn’t pay for Minds+ - of 90% of its users – wouldn’t count toward engagement rewards. Your votes, comments and reminds ain’t worth nothing in the new token system.<br /><br />The change, just as the one before, came out of the blue, without consultations with community or any warning.<br /><br />It’s a huge change, and it isn’t just about tokens. It’s much more than that. It’s about trust.<br /><br />In the first version of the Minds Whitepaper (v0.1) <a class=\"u-url mention\" href=\"https://www.minds.com/ottman\" target=\"_blank\">@ottman</a>, <a class=\"u-url mention\" href=\"https://www.minds.com/jack\" target=\"_blank\">@jack</a> and others wrote:<br /><br />“Fraud and a general lack of transparency are major problems facing the social networking, payments and digital ad spaces […] [M]ainstream networks have started showing a double standard and are not treating all users equally under their policies”<br /><br />Minds promised to change it, but instead it changed itself, starting to behave just like other social networks. Lack of transparency, all users aren’t treated equally – that’s what’s happening on Minds since mid-March. <br /><br />I myself brought to Minds some 3000-5000 users from Facebook, promising them that Minds will treat them with respect. Now I feel that I’ve failed them: Minds is treating us with the same disregard as Facebook or Twitter.<br /><br />Most of us came here not for tokens but for free speech, Minds promising to be a free speech champion. <br /><br />But how can we trust its promises? How can we be sure that one day, without warning, Minds won’t change its mind about free speech, just as it’s changed its mind about transparency and equality? <br /><br />In the second version of Minds Whitepaper (v0.5), <a class=\"u-url mention\" href=\"https://www.minds.com/ottman\" target=\"_blank\">@ottman</a> wrote:<br /><br />“Every user’s voice carries the same voting weight on Minds, making it a truly community-operated and democratized system”.<br /><br />The recent changes are brazenly undemocratic. Voices of those of us who do not pay in US$ do not carry any weight now. Your voice doesn’t count, in the most literal sense. Just as they didn’t on Facebook or Twitter. <br /><br />I still hope it’s an honest mistake on the Minds’ side. A mistake that can be easily fixed.<br /><br />Three things should be rolled back, for us to start trusting Minds again:<br /><br />1. Users should be able to pay for Minds+ with tokens, again. On a current market exchange rate, probably with some small surcharge, insuring administration from excessive volatility.<br /><br />2. Every voice must count. The engagement reward system should be rolled back to the state before April 22, 2021.<br /><br />3. The Minds administration should consult its users before any major policy changes. Especially before the changes that take away functionality users already enjoy.<br /><br />To demonstrate the Minds administration that we’re unhappy with the latest changes, I ask all of you who’s not a Minds+ user to keep 24 hours of silence starting from 00:01 AM this Wednesday, April 28, 2021, your local time. <br /><br />Or, if you first see this post late this week, from the hour you see it. Don’t post, don’t upvote. Don’t remind. Don’t interact on Minds in any way for 24 hours. <br /><br />Let them see we’re serious about it. If activity on the site decreases, they’ll have to notice.<br /><br />And please, remind this post. The more people see it, the more successful this protest becomes. I won’t profit from it anyway – according to the new policy, your reminds won’t bring me any rewards.",
"to": [
"https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public"
],
"cc": [
"https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/458785439046705152/followers"
],
"tag": [
{
"type": "Mention",
"href": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/100000000000000000",
"name": "@Minds"
},
{
"type": "Mention",
"href": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/100000000000000000",
"name": "@ottman"
},
{
"type": "Mention",
"href": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/100000000000000000",
"name": "@jack"
},
{
"type": "Mention",
"href": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/100000000000000000",
"name": "@ottman"
}
],
"url": "https://www.minds.com/newsfeed/1233765594204397568",
"published": "2021-04-27T13:03:59+00:00",
"source": {
"content": "Hi. Most likely I don’t know you, but I want to ask you for one thing. It’s about the new Minds policies.\n\nPlease keep silent on Minds for 24 hours starting from 00:01 AM this Wednesday, April 28, 2021 (your local time). \n\nOr, if you first see this post later this week, from the hour you see it. Don’t post, don’t upvote. Don’t remind. Don’t interact on Minds in any way for 24 hours.\n\nHere’s why:\n\nTL;DR The Minds administration behaves erratically, moving the goalposts. We should let them know we don't like it before Minds gets broken.\n\nIt's not about tokens, but it starts with them. \n\nOne of the biggest @Minds selling points has been tokens. Minds lured new users with promises of tokens and of the wonderful things users would be able to do with them. \n\nOn March 16, 2021, dreams became true: users could now earn money just by holding tokens on-chain and providing liquidity.\n\nBut about a week before that, another change happened. Quietly, unannounced. Minds users suddenly couldn’t use tokens to pay for Minds+ anymore. \n\nThat was a huge change – many users had been earning tokens with exactly that purpose. Now this possibility was quietly taken away. \n\nMore than that – as it turned out, the new token benefits promised to everyone were made available only to those who paid for Minds+ with US$. Thus, Minds divided its users into two classes: the privileged, and the rest.\n\nOn April 22, even worse thing happened. Minds announced that from now on, the votes of those who didn’t pay for Minds+ - of 90% of its users – wouldn’t count toward engagement rewards. Your votes, comments and reminds ain’t worth nothing in the new token system.\n\nThe change, just as the one before, came out of the blue, without consultations with community or any warning.\n\nIt’s a huge change, and it isn’t just about tokens. It’s much more than that. It’s about trust.\n\nIn the first version of the Minds Whitepaper (v0.1) @ottman, @jack and others wrote:\n\n“Fraud and a general lack of transparency are major problems facing the social networking, payments and digital ad spaces […] [M]ainstream networks have started showing a double standard and are not treating all users equally under their policies”\n\nMinds promised to change it, but instead it changed itself, starting to behave just like other social networks. Lack of transparency, all users aren’t treated equally – that’s what’s happening on Minds since mid-March. \n\nI myself brought to Minds some 3000-5000 users from Facebook, promising them that Minds will treat them with respect. Now I feel that I’ve failed them: Minds is treating us with the same disregard as Facebook or Twitter.\n\nMost of us came here not for tokens but for free speech, Minds promising to be a free speech champion. \n\nBut how can we trust its promises? How can we be sure that one day, without warning, Minds won’t change its mind about free speech, just as it’s changed its mind about transparency and equality? \n\nIn the second version of Minds Whitepaper (v0.5), @ottman wrote:\n\n“Every user’s voice carries the same voting weight on Minds, making it a truly community-operated and democratized system”.\n\nThe recent changes are brazenly undemocratic. Voices of those of us who do not pay in US$ do not carry any weight now. Your voice doesn’t count, in the most literal sense. Just as they didn’t on Facebook or Twitter. \n\nI still hope it’s an honest mistake on the Minds’ side. A mistake that can be easily fixed.\n\nThree things should be rolled back, for us to start trusting Minds again:\n\n1. Users should be able to pay for Minds+ with tokens, again. On a current market exchange rate, probably with some small surcharge, insuring administration from excessive volatility.\n\n2. Every voice must count. The engagement reward system should be rolled back to the state before April 22, 2021.\n\n3. The Minds administration should consult its users before any major policy changes. Especially before the changes that take away functionality users already enjoy.\n\nTo demonstrate the Minds administration that we’re unhappy with the latest changes, I ask all of you who’s not a Minds+ user to keep 24 hours of silence starting from 00:01 AM this Wednesday, April 28, 2021, your local time. \n\nOr, if you first see this post late this week, from the hour you see it. Don’t post, don’t upvote. Don’t remind. Don’t interact on Minds in any way for 24 hours. \n\nLet them see we’re serious about it. If activity on the site decreases, they’ll have to notice.\n\nAnd please, remind this post. The more people see it, the more successful this protest becomes. I won’t profit from it anyway – according to the new policy, your reminds won’t bring me any rewards.",
"mediaType": "text/plain"
}
},
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1197308644404764673/entities/urn:activity:1233880719262633984/activity",
"to": [
"https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public"
],
"cc": [
"https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/458785439046705152",
"https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1197308644404764673/followers"
]
},
{
"type": "Create",
"actor": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1197308644404764673",
"object": {
"type": "Note",
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1197308644404764673/entities/urn:activity:1233026394524340224",
"attributedTo": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1197308644404764673",
"content": "А как разрешать коллизию между правами на информацию двух разных субъектов? Вот, например, кофейня около моего дома объявила данные о продажах коммерческой тайной. А я еженедельно публикую подробный отчёт о своих тратах в ней, включая накопленные бонусные баллы. И ещё пишу - в понедельник в 12-00 получил чашечку сразу, а во вторник в районе 17 стоял в очереди из трёх человек. Есть нарушение прав? <br /><br />Для простоты :-) - с точки зрения российского писаного закона, не будем говорить, что тут с либертарианской точки зрения (ибо очевидно).",
"to": [
"https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public"
],
"cc": [
"https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1197308644404764673/followers"
],
"tag": [],
"url": "https://www.minds.com/newsfeed/1233026394524340224",
"published": "2021-04-25T12:06:40+00:00",
"source": {
"content": "А как разрешать коллизию между правами на информацию двух разных субъектов? Вот, например, кофейня около моего дома объявила данные о продажах коммерческой тайной. А я еженедельно публикую подробный отчёт о своих тратах в ней, включая накопленные бонусные баллы. И ещё пишу - в понедельник в 12-00 получил чашечку сразу, а во вторник в районе 17 стоял в очереди из трёх человек. Есть нарушение прав? \n\nДля простоты :-) - с точки зрения российского писаного закона, не будем говорить, что тут с либертарианской точки зрения (ибо очевидно).",
"mediaType": "text/plain"
}
},
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1197308644404764673/entities/urn:activity:1233026394524340224/activity"
},
{
"type": "Create",
"actor": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1197308644404764673",
"object": {
"type": "Note",
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1197308644404764673/entities/urn:activity:1232640753111732224",
"attributedTo": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1197308644404764673",
"content": "Стандартный вопрос: \"сохранение тенденции сокращения распространения\" - это какая производная ковида по времени?",
"to": [
"https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public"
],
"cc": [
"https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1197308644404764673/followers"
],
"tag": [],
"url": "https://www.minds.com/newsfeed/1232640753111732224",
"published": "2021-04-24T10:34:16+00:00",
"source": {
"content": "Стандартный вопрос: \"сохранение тенденции сокращения распространения\" - это какая производная ковида по времени?",
"mediaType": "text/plain"
}
},
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1197308644404764673/entities/urn:activity:1232640753111732224/activity"
},
{
"type": "Create",
"actor": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1197308644404764673",
"object": {
"type": "Note",
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1197308644404764673/entities/urn:activity:1232385788938854400",
"attributedTo": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1197308644404764673",
"content": "\"Не путайте свой ковид с общественным\"<br /><br />(не моё, не уверен что автор хочет популярности)",
"to": [
"https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public"
],
"cc": [
"https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1197308644404764673/followers"
],
"tag": [],
"url": "https://www.minds.com/newsfeed/1232385788938854400",
"published": "2021-04-23T17:41:08+00:00",
"source": {
"content": "\"Не путайте свой ковид с общественным\"\n\n(не моё, не уверен что автор хочет популярности)",
"mediaType": "text/plain"
}
},
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1197308644404764673/entities/urn:activity:1232385788938854400/activity"
},
{
"type": "Create",
"actor": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1197308644404764673",
"object": {
"type": "Note",
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1197308644404764673/entities/urn:activity:1232362161108029440",
"attributedTo": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1197308644404764673",
"content": "<a href=\"https://vvagr.livejournal.com/2397748.html\" target=\"_blank\">https://vvagr.livejournal.com/2397748.html</a>",
"to": [
"https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public"
],
"cc": [
"https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1197308644404764673/followers"
],
"tag": [],
"url": "https://www.minds.com/newsfeed/1232362161108029440",
"published": "2021-04-23T16:07:15+00:00",
"source": {
"content": "https://vvagr.livejournal.com/2397748.html",
"mediaType": "text/plain"
}
},
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1197308644404764673/entities/urn:activity:1232362161108029440/activity"
},
{
"type": "Create",
"actor": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1197308644404764673",
"object": {
"type": "Note",
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1197308644404764673/entities/urn:activity:1229179434273198080",
"attributedTo": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1197308644404764673",
"content": "А у нас товар деликатнейший...<br /><br />В рамках одного разговора в ФБ полез на полку с книгами, купленными на Качалова. Любопытно выходит с ценами по годам покупки(!):<br /><br />Asimov, Lecherous Limericks, бриллиант коллекции, кто понимает. 88 год! paperback, 6-50 р.<br />C.S.Lewis, The Voyage of the Dawn Treader, религиозная пропаганда, 88 год, 6-50 р.<br />Sue Townsend, The Secret Diary of Adrian Mole, paperback, 89 год, 7-50 р.<br />Ian Fleming, For Your Eyes Only, paperback, 91 год, 25 р.<br />Isser Harel, The House on Garribaldi Street. Сионистская пропаганда, но уже 91 год, ничего удивительного. Твёрдая обложка, 25 р.<br />Ian Fleming, Thunderball, paperback, 92 год, 250 р.<br />Ian Fleming, Octopussy, paperback, 92 год, 175 р.<br /><br />Не всё в этом шкафу стоит. Были вестерны, были детективы про борьбу с агентами КГБ, была космическая фантастика, была психоделика от Филиппа Дика. С 85 года я там выпасался, и, судя по всему, цензуры не было или она была мягчайшая, список запрещённого к продаже был сильно меньше списка запрещённого к переводу.<br /><br />Песенка по теме: <a href=\"https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b_c5ThaAgEg\" target=\"_blank\">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b_c5ThaAgEg</a>",
"to": [
"https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public"
],
"cc": [
"https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1197308644404764673/followers"
],
"tag": [],
"url": "https://www.minds.com/newsfeed/1229179434273198080",
"published": "2021-04-14T21:20:14+00:00",
"source": {
"content": "А у нас товар деликатнейший...\n\nВ рамках одного разговора в ФБ полез на полку с книгами, купленными на Качалова. Любопытно выходит с ценами по годам покупки(!):\n\nAsimov, Lecherous Limericks, бриллиант коллекции, кто понимает. 88 год! paperback, 6-50 р.\nC.S.Lewis, The Voyage of the Dawn Treader, религиозная пропаганда, 88 год, 6-50 р.\nSue Townsend, The Secret Diary of Adrian Mole, paperback, 89 год, 7-50 р.\nIan Fleming, For Your Eyes Only, paperback, 91 год, 25 р.\nIsser Harel, The House on Garribaldi Street. Сионистская пропаганда, но уже 91 год, ничего удивительного. Твёрдая обложка, 25 р.\nIan Fleming, Thunderball, paperback, 92 год, 250 р.\nIan Fleming, Octopussy, paperback, 92 год, 175 р.\n\nНе всё в этом шкафу стоит. Были вестерны, были детективы про борьбу с агентами КГБ, была космическая фантастика, была психоделика от Филиппа Дика. С 85 года я там выпасался, и, судя по всему, цензуры не было или она была мягчайшая, список запрещённого к продаже был сильно меньше списка запрещённого к переводу.\n\nПесенка по теме: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b_c5ThaAgEg",
"mediaType": "text/plain"
}
},
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1197308644404764673/entities/urn:activity:1229179434273198080/activity"
},
{
"type": "Create",
"actor": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1197308644404764673",
"object": {
"type": "Note",
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1197308644404764673/entities/urn:activity:1227009724690886656",
"attributedTo": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1197308644404764673",
"content": "фейсбучек накернился",
"to": [
"https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public"
],
"cc": [
"https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1197308644404764673/followers"
],
"tag": [],
"url": "https://www.minds.com/newsfeed/1227009724690886656",
"published": "2021-04-08T21:38:35+00:00",
"source": {
"content": "фейсбучек накернился",
"mediaType": "text/plain"
}
},
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1197308644404764673/entities/urn:activity:1227009724690886656/activity"
},
{
"type": "Create",
"actor": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1197308644404764673",
"object": {
"type": "Note",
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1197308644404764673/entities/urn:activity:1226521320632823808",
"attributedTo": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1197308644404764673",
"content": "Интересный борец с левизной за бюджетные деньги. Но уж какой есть, и за такого спасибо. Это как в расшариваемом ныне рекламном боевом листке известной политической проститутки \"когда либералы и националисты восстанут единым фронтом\".<br /><br /><a href=\"https://meduza.io/feature/2021/03/29/my-vpervye-zhivem-v-takoe-vremya-kogda-lyudi-iskusstva-ne-na-storone-naroda\" target=\"_blank\">https://meduza.io/feature/2021/03/29/my-vpervye-zhivem-v-takoe-vremya-kogda-lyudi-iskusstva-ne-na-storone-naroda</a>",
"to": [
"https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public"
],
"cc": [
"https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1197308644404764673/followers"
],
"tag": [],
"url": "https://www.minds.com/newsfeed/1226521320632823808",
"published": "2021-04-07T13:17:50+00:00",
"source": {
"content": "Интересный борец с левизной за бюджетные деньги. Но уж какой есть, и за такого спасибо. Это как в расшариваемом ныне рекламном боевом листке известной политической проститутки \"когда либералы и националисты восстанут единым фронтом\".\n\nhttps://meduza.io/feature/2021/03/29/my-vpervye-zhivem-v-takoe-vremya-kogda-lyudi-iskusstva-ne-na-storone-naroda",
"mediaType": "text/plain"
}
},
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1197308644404764673/entities/urn:activity:1226521320632823808/activity"
},
{
"type": "Create",
"actor": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1197308644404764673",
"object": {
"type": "Note",
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1197308644404764673/entities/urn:activity:1226276556332294144",
"attributedTo": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1197308644404764673",
"content": "<a href=\"https://vvagr.livejournal.com/2396260.html\" target=\"_blank\">https://vvagr.livejournal.com/2396260.html</a><br />",
"to": [
"https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public"
],
"cc": [
"https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1197308644404764673/followers"
],
"tag": [],
"url": "https://www.minds.com/newsfeed/1226276556332294144",
"published": "2021-04-06T21:05:14+00:00",
"source": {
"content": "https://vvagr.livejournal.com/2396260.html\n",
"mediaType": "text/plain"
}
},
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1197308644404764673/entities/urn:activity:1226276556332294144/activity"
},
{
"type": "Create",
"actor": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1197308644404764673",
"object": {
"type": "Note",
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1197308644404764673/entities/urn:activity:1224850483847684096",
"attributedTo": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1197308644404764673",
"content": "Ну а если интересно послушать уже сегодня с утра и до вечера (а также завтра) много интересных людей (включая меня) про образование, экономику, инженерию, менеджмент и танцы - то welcome.<br /><br /><a href=\"https://ailev.livejournal.com/1560589.html\" target=\"_blank\">https://ailev.livejournal.com/1560589.html</a><br /><br />Пока просвещение дают.",
"to": [
"https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public"
],
"cc": [
"https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1197308644404764673/followers"
],
"tag": [],
"url": "https://www.minds.com/newsfeed/1224850483847684096",
"published": "2021-04-02T22:38:31+00:00",
"source": {
"content": "Ну а если интересно послушать уже сегодня с утра и до вечера (а также завтра) много интересных людей (включая меня) про образование, экономику, инженерию, менеджмент и танцы - то welcome.\n\nhttps://ailev.livejournal.com/1560589.html\n\nПока просвещение дают.",
"mediaType": "text/plain"
}
},
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1197308644404764673/entities/urn:activity:1224850483847684096/activity"
},
{
"type": "Create",
"actor": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1197308644404764673",
"object": {
"type": "Note",
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1197308644404764673/entities/urn:activity:1224810591262130176",
"attributedTo": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1197308644404764673",
"content": "Stay at home policy is a case of exception fallacy: an internet-based ecological study<br /><br />With our results, we were not able to explain if COVID-19 mortality is reduced by staying at home in ~ 98% of the comparisons after epidemiological weeks 9 to 34.<br /><br /><a href=\"https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-021-84092-1\" target=\"_blank\">https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-021-84092-1</a><br /><br />Editor’s Note: Readers are alerted that the conclusions of this article are subject to criticisms that are being considered by the Editors. A further editorial response will follow once all parties have been given an opportunity to respond in full.<br /><br />Сохраняем на диск на всяк случай.",
"to": [
"https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public"
],
"cc": [
"https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1197308644404764673/followers"
],
"tag": [],
"url": "https://www.minds.com/newsfeed/1224810591262130176",
"published": "2021-04-02T20:00:00+00:00",
"source": {
"content": "Stay at home policy is a case of exception fallacy: an internet-based ecological study\n\nWith our results, we were not able to explain if COVID-19 mortality is reduced by staying at home in ~ 98% of the comparisons after epidemiological weeks 9 to 34.\n\nhttps://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-021-84092-1\n\nEditor’s Note: Readers are alerted that the conclusions of this article are subject to criticisms that are being considered by the Editors. A further editorial response will follow once all parties have been given an opportunity to respond in full.\n\nСохраняем на диск на всяк случай.",
"mediaType": "text/plain"
}
},
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1197308644404764673/entities/urn:activity:1224810591262130176/activity"
},
{
"type": "Create",
"actor": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1197308644404764673",
"object": {
"type": "Note",
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1197308644404764673/entities/urn:activity:1223763564637196288",
"attributedTo": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1197308644404764673",
"content": "К философии этики в экономике - что-то я запутался.<br /><br />Вот стандартная линия рассуждений, направленная на принципиальную теоретическую невозможность межперсональных сравнений полезности (вот эта вот - методологический индивидуализм, субъективность предпочтений, ординальность предпочтений, отсутствие телепатии) - это какая аргументация в пользу соответствующей этики невмешательства в добровольные транзакции? Деонтическая или утилитарная? Или третья какая?",
"to": [
"https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public"
],
"cc": [
"https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1197308644404764673/followers"
],
"tag": [],
"url": "https://www.minds.com/newsfeed/1223763564637196288",
"published": "2021-03-30T22:39:30+00:00",
"source": {
"content": "К философии этики в экономике - что-то я запутался.\n\nВот стандартная линия рассуждений, направленная на принципиальную теоретическую невозможность межперсональных сравнений полезности (вот эта вот - методологический индивидуализм, субъективность предпочтений, ординальность предпочтений, отсутствие телепатии) - это какая аргументация в пользу соответствующей этики невмешательства в добровольные транзакции? Деонтическая или утилитарная? Или третья какая?",
"mediaType": "text/plain"
}
},
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1197308644404764673/entities/urn:activity:1223763564637196288/activity"
}
],
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1197308644404764673/outbox",
"partOf": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1197308644404764673/outboxoutbox"
}