A small tool to view real-world ActivityPub objects as JSON! Enter a URL
or username from Mastodon or a similar service below, and we'll send a
request with
the right
Accept
header
to the server to view the underlying object.
{
"@context": "https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams",
"type": "OrderedCollectionPage",
"orderedItems": [
{
"type": "Create",
"actor": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1196301673400639493",
"object": {
"type": "Note",
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1196301673400639493/entities/urn:activity:1197900520560984064",
"attributedTo": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1196301673400639493",
"content": "If Biden *truly* cared about diversity he would step down and let Kamala Harris be President right now and he would assume the role of Vice-President. Otherwise, Biden is just promoting diversity for his own self-interests and reinforcing the white supremacist default that he is complicit in advancing. <br /><br /><a href=\"https://www.cnn.com/2021/01/18/politics/diversity-joe-biden-cabinet-analysis/index.html\" target=\"_blank\">https://www.cnn.com/2021/01/18/politics/diversity-joe-biden-cabinet-analysis/index.html</a><br />",
"to": [
"https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public"
],
"cc": [
"https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1196301673400639493/followers"
],
"tag": [],
"url": "https://www.minds.com/newsfeed/1197900520560984064",
"published": "2021-01-18T13:49:00+00:00",
"source": {
"content": "If Biden *truly* cared about diversity he would step down and let Kamala Harris be President right now and he would assume the role of Vice-President. Otherwise, Biden is just promoting diversity for his own self-interests and reinforcing the white supremacist default that he is complicit in advancing. \n\nhttps://www.cnn.com/2021/01/18/politics/diversity-joe-biden-cabinet-analysis/index.html\n",
"mediaType": "text/plain"
}
},
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1196301673400639493/entities/urn:activity:1197900520560984064/activity"
},
{
"type": "Create",
"actor": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1196301673400639493",
"object": {
"type": "Note",
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1196301673400639493/entities/urn:activity:1197252142482460672",
"attributedTo": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1196301673400639493",
"content": "A Policy Mechanism For Free-Market Wealth Redistribution: General Public IPO Shares.<br /><br />Problem: Financial inequality is growing, and there is a divide on how best to address this issue. Does society give more power to government to redistribute wealth? The answer is a resounding yes, if you believe government is competent. The answer is a laughable no, if you believe government is incompetent. How then can we think about wealth redistribution in such a way that A) Doesn't *take* from people while at the same time B) empowers the lower-middle class?<br /><br />Below is the beginning formation of just one solution which is part of a much bigger puzzle. <br /><br />Solution: The introduction of regulation which mandates for a small percentage of IPO shares ~ call them GP (general public) IPO Shares ~ to be exclusively available for purchase by low/middle income earning individuals up until date X. Institutional investors could offer to purchase those shares immediately at a higher price point if they believe the value of the GP IPO Shares to be of significant value from someone who is lower/middle income or those lower/middle income people could hold onto those IPO shares and participate in the market. After date X, if GP IPO Shares are not all sold then they can be redistributed proportionally to the institutional investors. <br /><br />How can we verify that low/middle income earners are the ones who receive these shares and the ones benefiting? One way is through blockchain technology like Ethereum with the use of smart contracts. <br /><br />One thing is certain. If a system can be formed which incentivizes lower/middle income people to participate in the market, people will have one extra pathway to begin thinking differently about money, value, wealth creation, and economics. <br /><br />",
"to": [
"https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public"
],
"cc": [
"https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1196301673400639493/followers"
],
"tag": [],
"url": "https://www.minds.com/newsfeed/1197252142482460672",
"published": "2021-01-16T18:52:34+00:00",
"source": {
"content": "A Policy Mechanism For Free-Market Wealth Redistribution: General Public IPO Shares.\n\nProblem: Financial inequality is growing, and there is a divide on how best to address this issue. Does society give more power to government to redistribute wealth? The answer is a resounding yes, if you believe government is competent. The answer is a laughable no, if you believe government is incompetent. How then can we think about wealth redistribution in such a way that A) Doesn't *take* from people while at the same time B) empowers the lower-middle class?\n\nBelow is the beginning formation of just one solution which is part of a much bigger puzzle. \n\nSolution: The introduction of regulation which mandates for a small percentage of IPO shares ~ call them GP (general public) IPO Shares ~ to be exclusively available for purchase by low/middle income earning individuals up until date X. Institutional investors could offer to purchase those shares immediately at a higher price point if they believe the value of the GP IPO Shares to be of significant value from someone who is lower/middle income or those lower/middle income people could hold onto those IPO shares and participate in the market. After date X, if GP IPO Shares are not all sold then they can be redistributed proportionally to the institutional investors. \n\nHow can we verify that low/middle income earners are the ones who receive these shares and the ones benefiting? One way is through blockchain technology like Ethereum with the use of smart contracts. \n\nOne thing is certain. If a system can be formed which incentivizes lower/middle income people to participate in the market, people will have one extra pathway to begin thinking differently about money, value, wealth creation, and economics. \n\n",
"mediaType": "text/plain"
}
},
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1196301673400639493/entities/urn:activity:1197252142482460672/activity"
},
{
"type": "Create",
"actor": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1196301673400639493",
"object": {
"type": "Note",
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1196301673400639493/entities/urn:activity:1197184724732047360",
"attributedTo": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1196301673400639493",
"content": "Part of Biden's plan is to spike the minimum wage from $7.25/hour to $15/hour. Why do I think this is a bad idea for the U.S when in my country we have a $15/hour min wage? It's because the U.S system will not be doing any type of scaling up to the $15/hour wage, and during a pandemic when small businesses have been crippled and destroyed by Covid-19 policies, how are those small businesses going to be able to compete with big box stores? I predict that they simply just won't. It's possible to work towards a $15/hour min wage, but to make a small business owner pay twice as much in a time where they have been knee-capped is a death sentence. Hopefully I am wrong, what do you think? <br /><br /><a href=\"https://www.marketwatch.com/story/biden-called-his-1-9-trillion-relief-plan-the-first-step-heres-his-idea-for-part-two-11610731909?mod=home-page\" target=\"_blank\">https://www.marketwatch.com/story/biden-called-his-1-9-trillion-relief-plan-the-first-step-heres-his-idea-for-part-two-11610731909?mod=home-page</a><br /><br />Bidens Plan:<br /><a href=\"https://buildbackbetter.gov/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/COVID_Relief-Package-Fact-Sheet.pdf\" target=\"_blank\">https://buildbackbetter.gov/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/COVID_Relief-Package-Fact-Sheet.pdf</a><br /><br />",
"to": [
"https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public"
],
"cc": [
"https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1196301673400639493/followers"
],
"tag": [],
"url": "https://www.minds.com/newsfeed/1197184724732047360",
"published": "2021-01-16T14:24:40+00:00",
"source": {
"content": "Part of Biden's plan is to spike the minimum wage from $7.25/hour to $15/hour. Why do I think this is a bad idea for the U.S when in my country we have a $15/hour min wage? It's because the U.S system will not be doing any type of scaling up to the $15/hour wage, and during a pandemic when small businesses have been crippled and destroyed by Covid-19 policies, how are those small businesses going to be able to compete with big box stores? I predict that they simply just won't. It's possible to work towards a $15/hour min wage, but to make a small business owner pay twice as much in a time where they have been knee-capped is a death sentence. Hopefully I am wrong, what do you think? \n\nhttps://www.marketwatch.com/story/biden-called-his-1-9-trillion-relief-plan-the-first-step-heres-his-idea-for-part-two-11610731909?mod=home-page\n\nBidens Plan:\nhttps://buildbackbetter.gov/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/COVID_Relief-Package-Fact-Sheet.pdf\n\n",
"mediaType": "text/plain"
}
},
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1196301673400639493/entities/urn:activity:1197184724732047360/activity"
},
{
"type": "Create",
"actor": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1196301673400639493",
"object": {
"type": "Note",
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1196301673400639493/entities/urn:activity:1196454409149435904",
"attributedTo": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1196301673400639493",
"content": "I don’t think Boessenkool really understands that “Trumpism” is much more than just about losing an election. Whatever Trumpism is, it is heavily cultural in nature and it is a miscalculation to believe it to be just a function of policy. <br /><br />The author says he’ll tell people that “ Trump is a bad man, he's an evil man, and he did evil things...” but Trump also never started any new wars, which I think for most people has to objectively be a good thing. That is the problem with binary thought, it generates contradictions almost immediately, degenerates curiosity, and sours discourse. <br /><br />If Conservatives and the rest of society are interested in getting back the rational Trump supporters into the fold (I don’t mean the Q types), I suspect they’ll need a more culturally based approach as opposed to just one focused on policy, because for many Trump supporters, they actually really liked Trumps policies. <br />—————————————————<br /><a href=\"https://www.cbc.ca/radio/thecurrent/the-current-for-jan-13-2021-1.5871185/conservatives-must-reject-trumpism-and-address-voter-anger-rather-than-stoking-it-says-strategist-1.5871704\" target=\"_blank\">https://www.cbc.ca/radio/thecurrent/the-current-for-jan-13-2021-1.5871185/conservatives-must-reject-trumpism-and-address-voter-anger-rather-than-stoking-it-says-strategist-1.5871704</a>",
"to": [
"https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public"
],
"cc": [
"https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1196301673400639493/followers"
],
"tag": [],
"url": "https://www.minds.com/newsfeed/1196454409149435904",
"published": "2021-01-14T14:02:40+00:00",
"source": {
"content": "I don’t think Boessenkool really understands that “Trumpism” is much more than just about losing an election. Whatever Trumpism is, it is heavily cultural in nature and it is a miscalculation to believe it to be just a function of policy. \n\nThe author says he’ll tell people that “ Trump is a bad man, he's an evil man, and he did evil things...” but Trump also never started any new wars, which I think for most people has to objectively be a good thing. That is the problem with binary thought, it generates contradictions almost immediately, degenerates curiosity, and sours discourse. \n\nIf Conservatives and the rest of society are interested in getting back the rational Trump supporters into the fold (I don’t mean the Q types), I suspect they’ll need a more culturally based approach as opposed to just one focused on policy, because for many Trump supporters, they actually really liked Trumps policies. \n—————————————————\nhttps://www.cbc.ca/radio/thecurrent/the-current-for-jan-13-2021-1.5871185/conservatives-must-reject-trumpism-and-address-voter-anger-rather-than-stoking-it-says-strategist-1.5871704",
"mediaType": "text/plain"
}
},
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1196301673400639493/entities/urn:activity:1196454409149435904/activity"
}
],
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1196301673400639493/outbox",
"partOf": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1196301673400639493/outboxoutbox"
}