ActivityPub Viewer

A small tool to view real-world ActivityPub objects as JSON! Enter a URL or username from Mastodon or a similar service below, and we'll send a request with the right Accept header to the server to view the underlying object.

Open in browser →
{ "@context": "https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams", "type": "OrderedCollectionPage", "orderedItems": [ { "type": "Announce", "actor": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1194430457597403137", "object": { "type": "Note", "id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1195594711562199059/entities/urn:activity:1243685810595782656", "attributedTo": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1195594711562199059", "content": "Here is a prime example of an attitude the west needs to correct if they want to stand a chance against Manga.<br /><br />You can't be afraid to give your target audience what they want! In particular, western comics (outside of a few Scholastic books for VERY young kids) are having problems reaching younger audiences. Since I used to be a boy, let's focus on that.<br /><br />What do boys want to see in their comics? Lots of cool escapist action, either a badass alpha male main character or a boy around our age on some adventure doing things we WISH we could do, and... cute/sexy girls. See, this last one in particular is where the west trips itself up.<br /><br />What do teenage boys find attractive? Teenage girls of course. But the west REFUSES to make attractive teenage girls anymore because \"HURRRF SHE'S 15 YOU CREEP!!!\" Basically, teenage boys aren't allowed to have what they want, because adult men might also like it. Not even joking, it's THAT fucking stupid!<br /><br />So until someone here finds the balls to give these manga reading audiences what they want, and stop making excuses like \"this could never be made here\", the west is doomed to keep failing forever.", "to": [ "https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public" ], "cc": [ "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1195594711562199059/followers" ], "tag": [], "url": "https://www.minds.com/newsfeed/1243685810595782656", "published": "2021-05-24T22:03:23+00:00", "source": { "content": "Here is a prime example of an attitude the west needs to correct if they want to stand a chance against Manga.\n\nYou can't be afraid to give your target audience what they want! In particular, western comics (outside of a few Scholastic books for VERY young kids) are having problems reaching younger audiences. Since I used to be a boy, let's focus on that.\n\nWhat do boys want to see in their comics? Lots of cool escapist action, either a badass alpha male main character or a boy around our age on some adventure doing things we WISH we could do, and... cute/sexy girls. See, this last one in particular is where the west trips itself up.\n\nWhat do teenage boys find attractive? Teenage girls of course. But the west REFUSES to make attractive teenage girls anymore because \"HURRRF SHE'S 15 YOU CREEP!!!\" Basically, teenage boys aren't allowed to have what they want, because adult men might also like it. Not even joking, it's THAT fucking stupid!\n\nSo until someone here finds the balls to give these manga reading audiences what they want, and stop making excuses like \"this could never be made here\", the west is doomed to keep failing forever.", "mediaType": "text/plain" } }, "id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1194430457597403137/entities/urn:activity:1243686780873220096/activity", "to": [ "https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public" ], "cc": [ "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1195594711562199059", "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1194430457597403137/followers" ] }, { "type": "Announce", "actor": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1194430457597403137", "object": { "type": "Note", "id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1195594711562199059/entities/urn:activity:1229867203269009408", "attributedTo": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1195594711562199059", "content": "Star Wars, Apathy, and the \"Culture War\"....<br /><br />So I've said on many occasions that if a creator screws up, and a large chunk of their fans flip from love to hate, they still have a chance to win those (former) fans back if they act fast enough. As long as they're still in the \"hate\" stage, they can be recovered. But once they let go of the hate and apathy kicks in.... Game Over. They don't care anymore. Nothing you can do will bring them back.<br /><br />This is why it's so important for mistakes to be corrected QUICKLY. But what happens when instead of correcting a mistake, the corpo/creator in question doubles down, for YEARS? What happens when they are only begrudgingly brought to correct a mistake when faced with certain bankruptcy?<br /><br />Some say it's important from a \"culture war\" standpoint to score this victory and give them another chance. I'd agree, as long as the mistake is QUICKLY corrected. But in the case of something like Star Wars, where they've been doubling down for a decade? Nah, let it die. It's not a \"loss\" for us to just let it fail now, it's not a \"win\" for the other side, it's a win for US.<br /><br />I believe it's a lot more valuable to let corpos/creators that are too far gone go bankrupt, and use that as a warning to all others. \"This is what happens when you side with a certain group of people and stab your own fans in the back.\" That IMO is the most important and powerful victory we can achieve.<br /><br />I for one have no interest in saving an IP I've already long since given up on. I've found other, better things, that haven't betrayed my trust. Don't have the time or money to waste on some corporate lowest common denominator focus group slop. Especially since I know the second they feel comfortable again, they'll just sink another knife in my back.<br /><br />Be wary of anything that has big corporations, investors, shareholders, etc. behind it. It doesn't just exist to make money, but to MAXIMIZE money made. The second they believe they can make even 1% more money by throwing you under the bus to appeal to some other audience, they'll do so in a heartbeat.<br /><br />Instead, consider supporting independent creators, that's the only place left where passion isn't completely crushed by bureaucracy.", "to": [ "https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public" ], "cc": [ "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1195594711562199059/followers" ], "tag": [], "url": "https://www.minds.com/newsfeed/1229867203269009408", "published": "2021-04-16T18:53:11+00:00", "source": { "content": "Star Wars, Apathy, and the \"Culture War\"....\n\nSo I've said on many occasions that if a creator screws up, and a large chunk of their fans flip from love to hate, they still have a chance to win those (former) fans back if they act fast enough. As long as they're still in the \"hate\" stage, they can be recovered. But once they let go of the hate and apathy kicks in.... Game Over. They don't care anymore. Nothing you can do will bring them back.\n\nThis is why it's so important for mistakes to be corrected QUICKLY. But what happens when instead of correcting a mistake, the corpo/creator in question doubles down, for YEARS? What happens when they are only begrudgingly brought to correct a mistake when faced with certain bankruptcy?\n\nSome say it's important from a \"culture war\" standpoint to score this victory and give them another chance. I'd agree, as long as the mistake is QUICKLY corrected. But in the case of something like Star Wars, where they've been doubling down for a decade? Nah, let it die. It's not a \"loss\" for us to just let it fail now, it's not a \"win\" for the other side, it's a win for US.\n\nI believe it's a lot more valuable to let corpos/creators that are too far gone go bankrupt, and use that as a warning to all others. \"This is what happens when you side with a certain group of people and stab your own fans in the back.\" That IMO is the most important and powerful victory we can achieve.\n\nI for one have no interest in saving an IP I've already long since given up on. I've found other, better things, that haven't betrayed my trust. Don't have the time or money to waste on some corporate lowest common denominator focus group slop. Especially since I know the second they feel comfortable again, they'll just sink another knife in my back.\n\nBe wary of anything that has big corporations, investors, shareholders, etc. behind it. It doesn't just exist to make money, but to MAXIMIZE money made. The second they believe they can make even 1% more money by throwing you under the bus to appeal to some other audience, they'll do so in a heartbeat.\n\nInstead, consider supporting independent creators, that's the only place left where passion isn't completely crushed by bureaucracy.", "mediaType": "text/plain" } }, "id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1194430457597403137/entities/urn:activity:1229871379018534912/activity", "to": [ "https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public" ], "cc": [ "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1195594711562199059", "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1194430457597403137/followers" ] }, { "type": "Announce", "actor": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1194430457597403137", "object": { "type": "Note", "id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1196077487570821129/entities/urn:activity:1226622722944286720", "attributedTo": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1196077487570821129", "content": "<a href=\"https://www.minds.com/newsfeed/1226622722944286720\" target=\"_blank\">https://www.minds.com/newsfeed/1226622722944286720</a>", "to": [ "https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public" ], "cc": [ "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1196077487570821129/followers" ], "tag": [], "url": "https://www.minds.com/newsfeed/1226622722944286720", "published": "2021-04-07T20:00:45+00:00", "source": { "content": "https://www.minds.com/newsfeed/1226622722944286720", "mediaType": "text/plain" } }, "id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1194430457597403137/entities/urn:activity:1228426678323482624/activity", "to": [ "https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public" ], "cc": [ "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1196077487570821129", "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1194430457597403137/followers" ] }, { "type": "Announce", "actor": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1194430457597403137", "object": { "type": "Note", "id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1194727080370118674/entities/urn:activity:1210069308927008768", "attributedTo": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1194727080370118674", "content": "You have no idea how accurate this is. Every anti freedom, ban porn right winger I've ever argued with on Twitter. I check their history and they always have crap about how they \"slipped into temptation\". Accompanied with some short lived self loathing that leads to an \"it's not my fault, it's porn's fault. I (and all men) can't be pure till all porn is illegal!\"", "to": [ "https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public" ], "cc": [ "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1194727080370118674/followers", "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1036126595993051152" ], "tag": [], "url": "https://www.minds.com/newsfeed/1210069308927008768", "published": "2021-02-21T03:43:25+00:00", "inReplyTo": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1036126595993051152/entities/urn:activity:1210067988593946624", "source": { "content": "You have no idea how accurate this is. Every anti freedom, ban porn right winger I've ever argued with on Twitter. I check their history and they always have crap about how they \"slipped into temptation\". Accompanied with some short lived self loathing that leads to an \"it's not my fault, it's porn's fault. I (and all men) can't be pure till all porn is illegal!\"", "mediaType": "text/plain" } }, "id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1194430457597403137/entities/urn:activity:1228426404439625728/activity", "to": [ "https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public" ], "cc": [ "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1194727080370118674", "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1194430457597403137/followers" ] }, { "type": "Announce", "actor": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1194430457597403137", "object": { "type": "Note", "id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1195594711562199059/entities/urn:activity:1228420278351667200", "attributedTo": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1195594711562199059", "content": "Anime may eventually be compromised by the west, but manga will remain safe because....<br /><br />The west will always only ever be a SECONDARY market for manga, with possible exceptions like the Shonen Jump subscription app. If you buy a 200 page manga book, you are already buying a reprint! The contents of that book have already been paid for by magazine sales in Japan, and the work is already finished. Think about what an awesome position this puts the publishers in.... They already paid the mangaka, all their assistants, everyone else involved in the production of the manga, and when they get to the point of selling the compiled volumes it's all extra money.<br /><br />Which is one of the main reasons they can sell the books as cheaply as they do. These things would be a lot more expensive if they had to pay everyone from only the compiled volume sales. Because of this, unless the business model for making manga changes, it's pretty much impossible for the west to infect the source in Japan. If the JAPANESE magazine buyers don't like a manga, it quickly gets canceled. Do you see weekly manga magazines becoming a thing in the west anytime soon? I sure don't!<br /><br />This also means that it's HIGHLY unlikely the west can ever compete on quantity/price when it comes to manga. One possible way to MAYBE replicate this would be to monetize a web comic and then release compiled volumes of that for relatively cheap, since at that point your only major expenses would be printing and fulfillment. That will work for a few people, but it's impossible for most.<br /><br />That's why I say we should focus on doing what manga can't/won't. Europe probably has the best model, yearly high quality releases in full color. Trying to compete with manga on speed and price is a losing proposition, so instead I'm all about creating great manga style art in full color!", "to": [ "https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public" ], "cc": [ "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1195594711562199059/followers" ], "tag": [], "url": "https://www.minds.com/newsfeed/1228420278351667200", "published": "2021-04-12T19:03:50+00:00", "source": { "content": "Anime may eventually be compromised by the west, but manga will remain safe because....\n\nThe west will always only ever be a SECONDARY market for manga, with possible exceptions like the Shonen Jump subscription app. If you buy a 200 page manga book, you are already buying a reprint! The contents of that book have already been paid for by magazine sales in Japan, and the work is already finished. Think about what an awesome position this puts the publishers in.... They already paid the mangaka, all their assistants, everyone else involved in the production of the manga, and when they get to the point of selling the compiled volumes it's all extra money.\n\nWhich is one of the main reasons they can sell the books as cheaply as they do. These things would be a lot more expensive if they had to pay everyone from only the compiled volume sales. Because of this, unless the business model for making manga changes, it's pretty much impossible for the west to infect the source in Japan. If the JAPANESE magazine buyers don't like a manga, it quickly gets canceled. Do you see weekly manga magazines becoming a thing in the west anytime soon? I sure don't!\n\nThis also means that it's HIGHLY unlikely the west can ever compete on quantity/price when it comes to manga. One possible way to MAYBE replicate this would be to monetize a web comic and then release compiled volumes of that for relatively cheap, since at that point your only major expenses would be printing and fulfillment. That will work for a few people, but it's impossible for most.\n\nThat's why I say we should focus on doing what manga can't/won't. Europe probably has the best model, yearly high quality releases in full color. Trying to compete with manga on speed and price is a losing proposition, so instead I'm all about creating great manga style art in full color!", "mediaType": "text/plain" } }, "id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1194430457597403137/entities/urn:activity:1228425095997132800/activity", "to": [ "https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public" ], "cc": [ "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1195594711562199059", "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1194430457597403137/followers" ] }, { "type": "Announce", "actor": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1194430457597403137", "object": { "type": "Note", "id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1195594711562199059/entities/urn:activity:1224790495785435136", "attributedTo": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1195594711562199059", "content": "Is it worth rebuilding bridges with the people who burn them once they feel they have no more use for you?<br /><br />I'd say no. Actually I find it kind of funny when a parasite forgets it needs its host to survive, burns the bridge with its host, and then cries when the host doesn't \"forgive and forget\" and let the parasite re-attach itself. If someone burns a bridge with you when they feel they have the power, you have no reason to rebuild it after they realize they needed you way more than you \"needed\" them.<br /><br />And \"petty grievances\" aside, let's look at this logically. Why would you give someone who stabbed you in the back a second chance, when the world is full of much better people who've never wronged you? With the VERY rare exception of some savant with a super rare set of skills (though these people generally have no problems finding other work/relationships, they would have no need to go back to you) or someone whose distinct style has become a big part of a project, we can ALL be replaced.<br /><br />Look at artists for example. As the legacy industries die, we'll be seeing the same people who labeled us Nazis (among other horrible things) suddenly become open to working with us. But why would we want to work with them? For every big name mainstream artist, there are hundreds of artists who are just as good as (or often BETTER) than them, but they've never been given a chance. There are artists open to commissions on Pixiv that are way better than most of the \"greats\" in the mainstream, but since competition is so fierce they've never gotten the chance to break out. Why not work with one of them instead? Why give work to someone who stabbed you in the back and disavowed you, when there are much better artists you can work with instead?<br /><br />Same thing with game developers! Most \"professional\" game developers these days (at least the vocal ones) are extremist political ideologues that make it clear the type of people they won't work with. You bet this attitude will change once their safe space collapses around them. And when that happens, why would we work with them when there are much better people out there? For every actually good developer in the mainstream, there are hundreds of modders and coders working on passion projects that are way better. Why give horrible backstabbers a second chance, when there are WAY better options out there?<br /><br />The only time I would even consider giving any of these cretins another chance is if they are literally the only ones with the skills to do what I need (and again, if that were true, they'd have no need to come to me for work, they'd have no problems finding it elsewhere) or if it was someone I already worked with in the past and our common projects could not continue without both of us on them.<br /><br />Those exceptions aside, leave the mainstream industries and the cretins inhabiting them behind. There are much more talented people OUTSIDE of these industries who would like a chance. Some of them might be a bit rough, but if you put the effort in and give them a chance they'll develop and become WAY better than these horrible people who hate your guts anyway.<br /><br />There's no point in rebuilding bridges with horrible parasites. Forget they even exist, and forge ahead with much better people by your side.", "to": [ "https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public" ], "cc": [ "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1195594711562199059/followers" ], "tag": [], "url": "https://www.minds.com/newsfeed/1224790495785435136", "published": "2021-04-02T18:40:09+00:00", "source": { "content": "Is it worth rebuilding bridges with the people who burn them once they feel they have no more use for you?\n\nI'd say no. Actually I find it kind of funny when a parasite forgets it needs its host to survive, burns the bridge with its host, and then cries when the host doesn't \"forgive and forget\" and let the parasite re-attach itself. If someone burns a bridge with you when they feel they have the power, you have no reason to rebuild it after they realize they needed you way more than you \"needed\" them.\n\nAnd \"petty grievances\" aside, let's look at this logically. Why would you give someone who stabbed you in the back a second chance, when the world is full of much better people who've never wronged you? With the VERY rare exception of some savant with a super rare set of skills (though these people generally have no problems finding other work/relationships, they would have no need to go back to you) or someone whose distinct style has become a big part of a project, we can ALL be replaced.\n\nLook at artists for example. As the legacy industries die, we'll be seeing the same people who labeled us Nazis (among other horrible things) suddenly become open to working with us. But why would we want to work with them? For every big name mainstream artist, there are hundreds of artists who are just as good as (or often BETTER) than them, but they've never been given a chance. There are artists open to commissions on Pixiv that are way better than most of the \"greats\" in the mainstream, but since competition is so fierce they've never gotten the chance to break out. Why not work with one of them instead? Why give work to someone who stabbed you in the back and disavowed you, when there are much better artists you can work with instead?\n\nSame thing with game developers! Most \"professional\" game developers these days (at least the vocal ones) are extremist political ideologues that make it clear the type of people they won't work with. You bet this attitude will change once their safe space collapses around them. And when that happens, why would we work with them when there are much better people out there? For every actually good developer in the mainstream, there are hundreds of modders and coders working on passion projects that are way better. Why give horrible backstabbers a second chance, when there are WAY better options out there?\n\nThe only time I would even consider giving any of these cretins another chance is if they are literally the only ones with the skills to do what I need (and again, if that were true, they'd have no need to come to me for work, they'd have no problems finding it elsewhere) or if it was someone I already worked with in the past and our common projects could not continue without both of us on them.\n\nThose exceptions aside, leave the mainstream industries and the cretins inhabiting them behind. There are much more talented people OUTSIDE of these industries who would like a chance. Some of them might be a bit rough, but if you put the effort in and give them a chance they'll develop and become WAY better than these horrible people who hate your guts anyway.\n\nThere's no point in rebuilding bridges with horrible parasites. Forget they even exist, and forge ahead with much better people by your side.", "mediaType": "text/plain" } }, "id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1194430457597403137/entities/urn:activity:1224792482447626240/activity", "to": [ "https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public" ], "cc": [ "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1195594711562199059", "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1194430457597403137/followers" ] }, { "type": "Announce", "actor": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1194430457597403137", "object": { "type": "Note", "id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1195615693979000837/entities/urn:activity:1224560840098770944", "attributedTo": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1195615693979000837", "content": "Just follow daddy government guys!<br />-- Government censors them<br />OMG FIGHT CENSORSHIP WITH US!<br /><br />Lolis are the Ultimate Free Speech IQ test. And it's doing its job really well!<br /><br />PROTIP:<br />1. \"Cuties is legal and lolis are not\" - Worst argument ever. You lose both the free speech argument and moral argument since you're just agreeing to the government thought policing while altogether arguing about the immorality of DRAWINGS as you ignore actual child exploitation.<br /><br />2. You're not saying anything original that hasn't been refuted before by repeating the \"lolis are child porn\" argument. The legal definition of Child Porn varies depending on how authoritarian and how insistent on thought policing the government is. Some countries does not include drawn pornography (no matter the pedophilic content) as child pornography due to the strict definitions of what the law considers to be a \"child\". In most cases, the categorization of drawn pornography as child porn hinges more on obscenity laws, not actual exploitation of real children. The same obscenity law that can be used to censor political speech.<br /><br />3. Defending obscenity laws - BAD IDEA if you call yourself a free speech advocate. Especially if you consider yourself a FREE SPEECH ABSOLUTIST. Obscenity laws are bad news to political speech because just like the way the definition of \"child porn\" was changed to include \"simulated child porn\", political speeches can be thus redefined as \"subversion\", \"insurrection\", or a \"hate crime\" to make them illegal. If that sounds familiar, it's because it's already happening. It's DEFINITIONAL RETREAT FALLACY applied to law making. You should never allow the government to change the definition of legal terms to accommodate their ideological agenda.<br /><br /><a href=\"https://www.minds.com/newsfeed/1223701940358352896?referrer=rhyanjill\" target=\"_blank\">https://www.minds.com/newsfeed/1223701940358352896?referrer=rhyanjill</a>", "to": [ "https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public" ], "cc": [ "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1195615693979000837/followers" ], "tag": [], "url": "https://www.minds.com/newsfeed/1224560840098770944", "published": "2021-04-02T03:27:34+00:00", "source": { "content": "Just follow daddy government guys!\n-- Government censors them\nOMG FIGHT CENSORSHIP WITH US!\n\nLolis are the Ultimate Free Speech IQ test. And it's doing its job really well!\n\nPROTIP:\n1. \"Cuties is legal and lolis are not\" - Worst argument ever. You lose both the free speech argument and moral argument since you're just agreeing to the government thought policing while altogether arguing about the immorality of DRAWINGS as you ignore actual child exploitation.\n\n2. You're not saying anything original that hasn't been refuted before by repeating the \"lolis are child porn\" argument. The legal definition of Child Porn varies depending on how authoritarian and how insistent on thought policing the government is. Some countries does not include drawn pornography (no matter the pedophilic content) as child pornography due to the strict definitions of what the law considers to be a \"child\". In most cases, the categorization of drawn pornography as child porn hinges more on obscenity laws, not actual exploitation of real children. The same obscenity law that can be used to censor political speech.\n\n3. Defending obscenity laws - BAD IDEA if you call yourself a free speech advocate. Especially if you consider yourself a FREE SPEECH ABSOLUTIST. Obscenity laws are bad news to political speech because just like the way the definition of \"child porn\" was changed to include \"simulated child porn\", political speeches can be thus redefined as \"subversion\", \"insurrection\", or a \"hate crime\" to make them illegal. If that sounds familiar, it's because it's already happening. It's DEFINITIONAL RETREAT FALLACY applied to law making. You should never allow the government to change the definition of legal terms to accommodate their ideological agenda.\n\nhttps://www.minds.com/newsfeed/1223701940358352896?referrer=rhyanjill", "mediaType": "text/plain" } }, "id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1194430457597403137/entities/urn:activity:1224578094950866944/activity", "to": [ "https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public" ], "cc": [ "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1195615693979000837", "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1194430457597403137/followers" ] }, { "type": "Announce", "actor": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1194430457597403137", "object": { "type": "Note", "id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1196077487570821129/entities/urn:activity:1224439026986172416", "attributedTo": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1196077487570821129", "content": "<a href=\"https://www.minds.com/newsfeed/1224439026986172416\" target=\"_blank\">https://www.minds.com/newsfeed/1224439026986172416</a>", "to": [ "https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public" ], "cc": [ "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1196077487570821129/followers" ], "tag": [], "url": "https://www.minds.com/newsfeed/1224439026986172416", "published": "2021-04-01T19:23:31+00:00", "source": { "content": "https://www.minds.com/newsfeed/1224439026986172416", "mediaType": "text/plain" } }, "id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1194430457597403137/entities/urn:activity:1224485191938691072/activity", "to": [ "https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public" ], "cc": [ "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1196077487570821129", "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1194430457597403137/followers" ] }, { "type": "Announce", "actor": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1194430457597403137", "object": { "type": "Note", "id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1194914392274116628/entities/urn:activity:1224257340335824896", "attributedTo": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1194914392274116628", "content": "Best best and only route you should take. ", "to": [ "https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public" ], "cc": [ "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1194914392274116628/followers" ], "tag": [], "url": "https://www.minds.com/newsfeed/1224257340335824896", "published": "2021-04-01T07:21:34+00:00", "source": { "content": "Best best and only route you should take. ", "mediaType": "text/plain" } }, "id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1194430457597403137/entities/urn:activity:1224483979779031040/activity", "to": [ "https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public" ], "cc": [ "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1194914392274116628", "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1194430457597403137/followers" ] }, { "type": "Announce", "actor": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1194430457597403137", "object": { "type": "Note", "id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1196289164455190536/entities/urn:activity:1224420917824409600", "attributedTo": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1196289164455190536", "content": "Artist is Nekopuchi", "to": [ "https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public" ], "cc": [ "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1196289164455190536/followers" ], "tag": [], "url": "https://www.minds.com/newsfeed/1224420917824409600", "published": "2021-04-01T18:11:34+00:00", "source": { "content": "Artist is Nekopuchi", "mediaType": "text/plain" } }, "id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1194430457597403137/entities/urn:activity:1224483827500400640/activity", "to": [ "https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public" ], "cc": [ "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1196289164455190536", "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1194430457597403137/followers" ] } ], "id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1194430457597403137/outbox", "partOf": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1194430457597403137/outboxoutbox" }