A small tool to view real-world ActivityPub objects as JSON! Enter a URL
or username from Mastodon or a similar service below, and we'll send a
request with
the right
Accept
header
to the server to view the underlying object.
{
"@context": "https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams",
"type": "OrderedCollectionPage",
"orderedItems": [
{
"type": "Announce",
"actor": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1172967100830982149",
"object": {
"type": "Note",
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1196645702243983379/entities/urn:activity:1199749504768126976",
"attributedTo": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1196645702243983379",
"content": "<a href=\"https://climate.news/2019-03-15-global-warming-a-total-hoax-and-scam-run-by-corrupt-scientists-warns-greenpeace-co-founder.html\" target=\"_blank\">https://climate.news/2019-03-15-global-warming-a-total-hoax-and-scam-run-by-corrupt-scientists-warns-greenpeace-co-founder.html</a><br /><a href=\"https://www.minds.com/search?f=top&t=all&q=environment\" title=\"#environment\" class=\"u-url hashtag\" target=\"_blank\">#environment</a> <a href=\"https://www.minds.com/search?f=top&t=all&q=climatechange\" title=\"#climatechange\" class=\"u-url hashtag\" target=\"_blank\">#climatechange</a> <a href=\"https://www.minds.com/search?f=top&t=all&q=weather\" title=\"#weather\" class=\"u-url hashtag\" target=\"_blank\">#weather</a>",
"to": [
"https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public"
],
"cc": [
"https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1196645702243983379/followers"
],
"tag": [],
"url": "https://www.minds.com/newsfeed/1199749504768126976",
"published": "2021-01-23T16:16:12+00:00",
"source": {
"content": "https://climate.news/2019-03-15-global-warming-a-total-hoax-and-scam-run-by-corrupt-scientists-warns-greenpeace-co-founder.html\n#environment #climatechange #weather",
"mediaType": "text/plain"
}
},
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1172967100830982149/entities/urn:activity:1200563263576920064/activity",
"to": [
"https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public"
],
"cc": [
"https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1196645702243983379",
"https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1172967100830982149/followers"
]
},
{
"type": "Announce",
"actor": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1172967100830982149",
"object": {
"type": "Note",
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1197259588102004740/entities/urn:activity:1200138770221895680",
"attributedTo": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1197259588102004740",
"content": "<a href=\"https://www.minds.com/newsfeed/1200138770221895680\" target=\"_blank\">https://www.minds.com/newsfeed/1200138770221895680</a>",
"to": [
"https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public"
],
"cc": [
"https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1197259588102004740/followers"
],
"tag": [],
"url": "https://www.minds.com/newsfeed/1200138770221895680",
"published": "2021-01-24T18:02:59+00:00",
"source": {
"content": "https://www.minds.com/newsfeed/1200138770221895680",
"mediaType": "text/plain"
}
},
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1172967100830982149/entities/urn:activity:1200562078723788800/activity",
"to": [
"https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public"
],
"cc": [
"https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1197259588102004740",
"https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1172967100830982149/followers"
]
},
{
"type": "Announce",
"actor": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1172967100830982149",
"object": {
"type": "Note",
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1016464980884594690/entities/urn:activity:1199151368586805248",
"attributedTo": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1016464980884594690",
"content": "SCIENCE FAIL:<br /> Portuguese court rules PCR tests are unreliable,<br /> unlawful “evidence” of alleged Covid-19 infections<br /><br />November 19, 2020<br /><br /> by: Ethan Huff<br /><br />(Natural News) Quarantining people based solely on a “positive” PCR test is no longer lawful in Portugal, thanks to a court decision ruling the test to be inherently unreliable, and thus fraudulent for policy-making purposes.<br /><br />Citing Jaafar et al. 2020, the court determined that the PCR test produces varying results depending on an individual’s viral load, as well as on the number of cycles used. In its conclusion, the court wrote that:<br /><br />“… if someone is tested by PCR as positive when a threshold of 35 cycles or higher is used (as is the rule in most laboratories in Europe and the U.S.), the probability that said person is infected is less than 3%, and the probability that said result is a false positive is 97%.”<br /><br />In other words, people who get tested with a PCR test will more than likely receive an inaccurate result, usually a false positive. This would suggest that the official Wuhan coronavirus (Covid-19) numbers are majorly skewed, making the plandemic seem worse than it actually is.<br /><br />Amazingly, nobody seems to know which cycle threshold for the PCR test was being used in Portugal up until this point. Consequently, there is no way to know how many people who tested “positive” actually had the Wuhan coronavirus (Covid-19).<br /><br />In India where the standard cycle threshold is between 37 and 40, the reliability of the PCR test there is similarly less than three percent, with a false positive rate as high as 97 percent.<br /><br />You will find more of the latest news about the Wuhan coronavirus (Covid-19) at Pandemic.news.<br /><br />PCR test never intended to detect whole viruses<br />The case in Portugal came about after four people were forcibly quarantined by the Regional Health Authority (RHA). One of these individuals received a PCR test, while the other three were deemed to have undergone “a high risk of exposure.”<br /><br />The RHA decided that all of them were “infectious” based on the circumstances, mandating that they go into forced isolation for the prescribed two-week period that most governments seem to be utilizing.<br /><br />These individuals sued for fraudulent science and won, setting a precedent for the PCR test to hopefully be discarded as pseudoscientific quackery, which is exactly what it is.<br /><br />Even The New York Times told the truth by revealing that most people who test “positive” using a PCR test are actually negative and healthy.<br /><br />Testing data collected from Massachusetts, New York, Nevada and elsewhere show that upwards of 90 percent of people who test “positive” with a PCR test are perfectly normal and disease-free.<br /><br />“Given how much scientific doubt exists – as voiced by experts, i.e., those who matter – about the reliability of the PCR tests, given the lack of information concerning the tests’ analytical parameters, and in the absence of a physician’s diagnosis supporting the existence of infection or risk, there is no way this court would ever be able to determine whether C was indeed a carrier of the SARS-CoV-2 virus, or whether A, B and D had been at a high risk of exposure to it,” the Portuguese court corroborated about the faulty nature of the PCR test.<br /><br />It is important to keep in mind that the PCR was never intended to be used as a method of trying to copy genetic material, which is how it is being used in Wuhan coronavirus (Covid-19) testing.<br /><br />“It was never intended to be a diagnostic tool,” Great Game India reports.<br /><br />In essence, if a PCR test is conducted on an immune person and turns up “positive,” what it is actually pulling up is perhaps a “shattered part of the viral genome.”<br /><br />“Even if the infectious viruses are long dead, a corona test can come back positive because the PCR method multiplies even a tiny fraction of the viral genetic material enough [to be detected],” Great Game India further notes.<br /><br />Sources for this article include:<br /><br />GreatGameIndia.com<br /><br />NaturalNews.com",
"to": [
"https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public"
],
"cc": [
"https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1016464980884594690/followers"
],
"tag": [],
"url": "https://www.minds.com/newsfeed/1199151368586805248",
"published": "2021-01-22T00:39:25+00:00",
"source": {
"content": "SCIENCE FAIL:\n Portuguese court rules PCR tests are unreliable,\n unlawful “evidence” of alleged Covid-19 infections\n\nNovember 19, 2020\n\n by: Ethan Huff\n\n(Natural News) Quarantining people based solely on a “positive” PCR test is no longer lawful in Portugal, thanks to a court decision ruling the test to be inherently unreliable, and thus fraudulent for policy-making purposes.\n\nCiting Jaafar et al. 2020, the court determined that the PCR test produces varying results depending on an individual’s viral load, as well as on the number of cycles used. In its conclusion, the court wrote that:\n\n“… if someone is tested by PCR as positive when a threshold of 35 cycles or higher is used (as is the rule in most laboratories in Europe and the U.S.), the probability that said person is infected is less than 3%, and the probability that said result is a false positive is 97%.”\n\nIn other words, people who get tested with a PCR test will more than likely receive an inaccurate result, usually a false positive. This would suggest that the official Wuhan coronavirus (Covid-19) numbers are majorly skewed, making the plandemic seem worse than it actually is.\n\nAmazingly, nobody seems to know which cycle threshold for the PCR test was being used in Portugal up until this point. Consequently, there is no way to know how many people who tested “positive” actually had the Wuhan coronavirus (Covid-19).\n\nIn India where the standard cycle threshold is between 37 and 40, the reliability of the PCR test there is similarly less than three percent, with a false positive rate as high as 97 percent.\n\nYou will find more of the latest news about the Wuhan coronavirus (Covid-19) at Pandemic.news.\n\nPCR test never intended to detect whole viruses\nThe case in Portugal came about after four people were forcibly quarantined by the Regional Health Authority (RHA). One of these individuals received a PCR test, while the other three were deemed to have undergone “a high risk of exposure.”\n\nThe RHA decided that all of them were “infectious” based on the circumstances, mandating that they go into forced isolation for the prescribed two-week period that most governments seem to be utilizing.\n\nThese individuals sued for fraudulent science and won, setting a precedent for the PCR test to hopefully be discarded as pseudoscientific quackery, which is exactly what it is.\n\nEven The New York Times told the truth by revealing that most people who test “positive” using a PCR test are actually negative and healthy.\n\nTesting data collected from Massachusetts, New York, Nevada and elsewhere show that upwards of 90 percent of people who test “positive” with a PCR test are perfectly normal and disease-free.\n\n“Given how much scientific doubt exists – as voiced by experts, i.e., those who matter – about the reliability of the PCR tests, given the lack of information concerning the tests’ analytical parameters, and in the absence of a physician’s diagnosis supporting the existence of infection or risk, there is no way this court would ever be able to determine whether C was indeed a carrier of the SARS-CoV-2 virus, or whether A, B and D had been at a high risk of exposure to it,” the Portuguese court corroborated about the faulty nature of the PCR test.\n\nIt is important to keep in mind that the PCR was never intended to be used as a method of trying to copy genetic material, which is how it is being used in Wuhan coronavirus (Covid-19) testing.\n\n“It was never intended to be a diagnostic tool,” Great Game India reports.\n\nIn essence, if a PCR test is conducted on an immune person and turns up “positive,” what it is actually pulling up is perhaps a “shattered part of the viral genome.”\n\n“Even if the infectious viruses are long dead, a corona test can come back positive because the PCR method multiplies even a tiny fraction of the viral genetic material enough [to be detected],” Great Game India further notes.\n\nSources for this article include:\n\nGreatGameIndia.com\n\nNaturalNews.com",
"mediaType": "text/plain"
}
},
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1172967100830982149/entities/urn:activity:1199723774847987712/activity",
"to": [
"https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public"
],
"cc": [
"https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1016464980884594690",
"https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1172967100830982149/followers"
]
},
{
"type": "Announce",
"actor": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1172967100830982149",
"object": {
"type": "Note",
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/878022352653262856/entities/urn:activity:1199063498129801216",
"attributedTo": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/878022352653262856",
"content": "<a href=\"https://www.minds.com/newsfeed/1199063498129801216\" target=\"_blank\">https://www.minds.com/newsfeed/1199063498129801216</a>",
"to": [
"https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public"
],
"cc": [
"https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/878022352653262856/followers"
],
"tag": [],
"url": "https://www.minds.com/newsfeed/1199063498129801216",
"published": "2021-01-21T18:50:14+00:00",
"source": {
"content": "https://www.minds.com/newsfeed/1199063498129801216",
"mediaType": "text/plain"
}
},
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1172967100830982149/entities/urn:activity:1199722141475745792/activity",
"to": [
"https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public"
],
"cc": [
"https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/878022352653262856",
"https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1172967100830982149/followers"
]
},
{
"type": "Announce",
"actor": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1172967100830982149",
"object": {
"type": "Note",
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/614198139255005203/entities/urn:activity:1198264985808515072",
"attributedTo": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/614198139255005203",
"content": "<a href=\"https://www.minds.com/search?f=top&t=all&q=censorship\" title=\"#censorship\" class=\"u-url hashtag\" target=\"_blank\">#censorship</a> <a href=\"https://www.minds.com/search?f=top&t=all&q=thoughtpolice\" title=\"#thoughtpolice\" class=\"u-url hashtag\" target=\"_blank\">#thoughtpolice</a>",
"to": [
"https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public"
],
"cc": [
"https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/614198139255005203/followers"
],
"tag": [],
"url": "https://www.minds.com/newsfeed/1198264985808515072",
"published": "2021-01-19T13:57:57+00:00",
"source": {
"content": "#censorship #thoughtpolice",
"mediaType": "text/plain"
}
},
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1172967100830982149/entities/urn:activity:1198613516810260480/activity",
"to": [
"https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public"
],
"cc": [
"https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/614198139255005203",
"https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1172967100830982149/followers"
]
},
{
"type": "Create",
"actor": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1172967100830982149",
"object": {
"type": "Note",
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1172967100830982149/entities/urn:activity:1197954960498454528",
"attributedTo": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1172967100830982149",
"content": "<a href=\"https://www.theepochtimes.com/mkt_app/55-people-died-in-us-after-receiving-covid-19-vaccines-reporting-system_3659152.html\" target=\"_blank\">https://www.theepochtimes.com/mkt_app/55-people-died-in-us-after-receiving-covid-19-vaccines-reporting-system_3659152.html</a><br />",
"to": [
"https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public"
],
"cc": [
"https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1172967100830982149/followers"
],
"tag": [],
"url": "https://www.minds.com/newsfeed/1197954960498454528",
"published": "2021-01-18T17:25:19+00:00",
"source": {
"content": "https://www.theepochtimes.com/mkt_app/55-people-died-in-us-after-receiving-covid-19-vaccines-reporting-system_3659152.html\n",
"mediaType": "text/plain"
}
},
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1172967100830982149/entities/urn:activity:1197954960498454528/activity"
},
{
"type": "Announce",
"actor": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1172967100830982149",
"object": {
"type": "Note",
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/653728467375890446/entities/urn:activity:1197178472174522368",
"attributedTo": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/653728467375890446",
"content": "Dunno who’s going to see this, but here’s a tiny PSA regarding the situation with Apple and Google causing Minds to mutilate the app version of the service:<br /><br />The web browser version of Minds works really, really well. Even with fully functional app, it worked better through browser, even on mobile devices. What’s ***most important***, as a lot of people seem to be misconstruing the app castration as mutilation of the service itself:<br /><br />THE WEB VERSION RETAINS ALL ITS FUNCTION.<br /><br />Please, tell people to keep using it. I believe Minds has a real shot at outlasting this weirdo Silicon Valley seppuku move, but it needs people to use it. Please Remind this post, or just plain old TALK to people, or both. Okay?",
"to": [
"https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public"
],
"cc": [
"https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/653728467375890446/followers"
],
"tag": [],
"url": "https://www.minds.com/newsfeed/1197178472174522368",
"published": "2021-01-16T13:59:50+00:00",
"source": {
"content": "Dunno who’s going to see this, but here’s a tiny PSA regarding the situation with Apple and Google causing Minds to mutilate the app version of the service:\n\nThe web browser version of Minds works really, really well. Even with fully functional app, it worked better through browser, even on mobile devices. What’s ***most important***, as a lot of people seem to be misconstruing the app castration as mutilation of the service itself:\n\nTHE WEB VERSION RETAINS ALL ITS FUNCTION.\n\nPlease, tell people to keep using it. I believe Minds has a real shot at outlasting this weirdo Silicon Valley seppuku move, but it needs people to use it. Please Remind this post, or just plain old TALK to people, or both. Okay?",
"mediaType": "text/plain"
}
},
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1172967100830982149/entities/urn:activity:1197954659448090624/activity",
"to": [
"https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public"
],
"cc": [
"https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/653728467375890446",
"https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1172967100830982149/followers"
]
},
{
"type": "Announce",
"actor": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1172967100830982149",
"object": {
"type": "Note",
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1016464980884594690/entities/urn:activity:1197946037461929984",
"attributedTo": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1016464980884594690",
"content": "<br />In addition to the deaths, people have reported 96 life-threatening events following COVID-19 vaccinations, as well as 24 permanent disabilities, 225 hospitalizations, and 1,388 emergency room visits<br /><br />",
"to": [
"https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public"
],
"cc": [
"https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1016464980884594690/followers"
],
"tag": [],
"url": "https://www.minds.com/newsfeed/1197946037461929984",
"published": "2021-01-18T16:49:52+00:00",
"source": {
"content": "\nIn addition to the deaths, people have reported 96 life-threatening events following COVID-19 vaccinations, as well as 24 permanent disabilities, 225 hospitalizations, and 1,388 emergency room visits\n\n",
"mediaType": "text/plain"
}
},
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1172967100830982149/entities/urn:activity:1197954032526774272/activity",
"to": [
"https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public"
],
"cc": [
"https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1016464980884594690",
"https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1172967100830982149/followers"
]
},
{
"type": "Announce",
"actor": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1172967100830982149",
"object": {
"type": "Note",
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/882205970489417734/entities/urn:activity:1195398081492459520",
"attributedTo": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/882205970489417734",
"content": "Funny, I don't remember this report or these videos being shown on the mainstream media, do you? Maybe it's best to let some people know about it. <br /><br />",
"to": [
"https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public"
],
"cc": [
"https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/882205970489417734/followers"
],
"tag": [],
"url": "https://www.minds.com/newsfeed/1195398081492459520",
"published": "2021-01-11T16:05:10+00:00",
"source": {
"content": "Funny, I don't remember this report or these videos being shown on the mainstream media, do you? Maybe it's best to let some people know about it. \n\n",
"mediaType": "text/plain"
}
},
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1172967100830982149/entities/urn:activity:1197953982698442752/activity",
"to": [
"https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public"
],
"cc": [
"https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/882205970489417734",
"https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1172967100830982149/followers"
]
},
{
"type": "Create",
"actor": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1172967100830982149",
"object": {
"type": "Note",
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1172967100830982149/entities/urn:activity:1197741339350597632",
"attributedTo": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1172967100830982149",
"content": "Had to delete my Minds app and just use the website version.<br />Google is blocking the ability to post comments, etc, on all external stories.<br /><br />Big Tech is going crazy, and people in the USA who are okay with this are idiots.",
"to": [
"https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public"
],
"cc": [
"https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1172967100830982149/followers"
],
"tag": [],
"url": "https://www.minds.com/newsfeed/1197741339350597632",
"published": "2021-01-18T03:16:28+00:00",
"source": {
"content": "Had to delete my Minds app and just use the website version.\nGoogle is blocking the ability to post comments, etc, on all external stories.\n\nBig Tech is going crazy, and people in the USA who are okay with this are idiots.",
"mediaType": "text/plain"
}
},
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1172967100830982149/entities/urn:activity:1197741339350597632/activity"
},
{
"type": "Announce",
"actor": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1172967100830982149",
"object": {
"type": "Note",
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/851527480761131010/entities/urn:activity:1197584323428044800",
"attributedTo": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/851527480761131010",
"content": "The COVID-19 pandemic has brought us many harsh lessons. Importantly, it has shown us how easy it is to manufacture panic and control entire populations through deceptive means.<br /><br />Topping the list of deceptive strategies is the use of a test that falsely labels healthy individuals as sick and infectious. This allows mass testing to drive the narrative that we’re in a lethal pandemic.<br /><br />Of course, I’m talking about the now infamous reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) test.<br /><br />The fact is, the PCR test is not designed to be used as a diagnostic tool as it cannot distinguish between inactive viruses and “live” or reproductive ones: <a href=\"https://humansarefree.com/2021/01/covid-19-testing-fraud-revealed.html\" target=\"_blank\">https://humansarefree.com/2021/01/covid-19-testing-fraud-revealed.html</a>",
"to": [
"https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public"
],
"cc": [
"https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/851527480761131010/followers"
],
"tag": [],
"url": "https://www.minds.com/newsfeed/1197584323428044800",
"published": "2021-01-17T16:52:32+00:00",
"source": {
"content": "The COVID-19 pandemic has brought us many harsh lessons. Importantly, it has shown us how easy it is to manufacture panic and control entire populations through deceptive means.\n\nTopping the list of deceptive strategies is the use of a test that falsely labels healthy individuals as sick and infectious. This allows mass testing to drive the narrative that we’re in a lethal pandemic.\n\nOf course, I’m talking about the now infamous reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) test.\n\nThe fact is, the PCR test is not designed to be used as a diagnostic tool as it cannot distinguish between inactive viruses and “live” or reproductive ones: https://humansarefree.com/2021/01/covid-19-testing-fraud-revealed.html",
"mediaType": "text/plain"
}
},
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1172967100830982149/entities/urn:activity:1197735651194048512/activity",
"to": [
"https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public"
],
"cc": [
"https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/851527480761131010",
"https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1172967100830982149/followers"
]
},
{
"type": "Announce",
"actor": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1172967100830982149",
"object": {
"type": "Note",
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/628952369064845314/entities/urn:activity:1197214738586976256",
"attributedTo": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/628952369064845314",
"content": "Joel Skousen: (\"In this bombshell video\", in case it gets censored) <br /><br />Dr. David Martin methodically and accurately takes apart the phony story that Moderna and Pfizer are delivering vaccines. He reveals that Moderna admits that their patents say “gene therapy” not “vaccine.” They put a synthetic RNA fragment embedded into a fat carrier, whose only purpose is to lessen the symptoms associated with the S-1 spike protein, not the actual virus.<br /><br />He proves by referencing the official definition of a vaccine that these are not vaccines. He says you cannot have a vaccine that doesn’t claim to result in either immunity or blocking transmission.<br /><br />The WHO admits that these shots don’t do any good. In a virtual press conference earlier this week, WHO chief scientist Soumya Swaminathan was specific: “I don’t believe we have the evidence on any of the vaccines to be confident that it’s going to prevent people from actually getting the infection and therefore being able to pass it on.” By their own patents and reference material, neither Pfizer nor Moderna claims this. Rather they only claim their devices are “gene therapy.”<br /><br />If this isn’t a vaccine, why are they calling it a vaccine? To gain the broad immunity that only vaccines are given. The 1986 law on Vaccine liability provides an exclusion only for vaccine makers, not for gene therapy—so they would be liable. This is why states are keeping this state of emergency in place to help shield Moderna and Pfizer and the states themselves. The state of emergency maintains the illusion of a vaccine shield.<br /><br />He then explains from a legal view that Moderna and Pfizer qualify as deceptive practices of making medical claims without clinic trial proof. 15 US Code, Section 41 of the Trade Commission act, is the law on deceptive practices. He shows why Moderna was never a vaccine company. In 2018, it was a gene therapy company, and still is.\"<br /><br /><a href=\"https://www.bitchute.com/video/amSLD9uxt7yA/\" target=\"_blank\">https://www.bitchute.com/video/amSLD9uxt7yA/</a>",
"to": [
"https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public"
],
"cc": [
"https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/628952369064845314/followers"
],
"tag": [],
"url": "https://www.minds.com/newsfeed/1197214738586976256",
"published": "2021-01-16T16:23:56+00:00",
"source": {
"content": "Joel Skousen: (\"In this bombshell video\", in case it gets censored) \n\nDr. David Martin methodically and accurately takes apart the phony story that Moderna and Pfizer are delivering vaccines. He reveals that Moderna admits that their patents say “gene therapy” not “vaccine.” They put a synthetic RNA fragment embedded into a fat carrier, whose only purpose is to lessen the symptoms associated with the S-1 spike protein, not the actual virus.\n\nHe proves by referencing the official definition of a vaccine that these are not vaccines. He says you cannot have a vaccine that doesn’t claim to result in either immunity or blocking transmission.\n\nThe WHO admits that these shots don’t do any good. In a virtual press conference earlier this week, WHO chief scientist Soumya Swaminathan was specific: “I don’t believe we have the evidence on any of the vaccines to be confident that it’s going to prevent people from actually getting the infection and therefore being able to pass it on.” By their own patents and reference material, neither Pfizer nor Moderna claims this. Rather they only claim their devices are “gene therapy.”\n\nIf this isn’t a vaccine, why are they calling it a vaccine? To gain the broad immunity that only vaccines are given. The 1986 law on Vaccine liability provides an exclusion only for vaccine makers, not for gene therapy—so they would be liable. This is why states are keeping this state of emergency in place to help shield Moderna and Pfizer and the states themselves. The state of emergency maintains the illusion of a vaccine shield.\n\nHe then explains from a legal view that Moderna and Pfizer qualify as deceptive practices of making medical claims without clinic trial proof. 15 US Code, Section 41 of the Trade Commission act, is the law on deceptive practices. He shows why Moderna was never a vaccine company. In 2018, it was a gene therapy company, and still is.\"\n\nhttps://www.bitchute.com/video/amSLD9uxt7yA/",
"mediaType": "text/plain"
}
},
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1172967100830982149/entities/urn:activity:1197735088544944128/activity",
"to": [
"https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public"
],
"cc": [
"https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/628952369064845314",
"https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1172967100830982149/followers"
]
}
],
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1172967100830982149/outbox",
"partOf": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1172967100830982149/outboxoutbox"
}