A small tool to view real-world ActivityPub objects as JSON! Enter a URL
or username from Mastodon or a similar service below, and we'll send a
request with
the right
Accept
header
to the server to view the underlying object.
{
"@context": "https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams",
"type": "OrderedCollectionPage",
"orderedItems": [
{
"type": "Create",
"actor": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1106183683695452168",
"object": {
"type": "Note",
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1106183683695452168/entities/urn:activity:1235286735081046016",
"attributedTo": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1106183683695452168",
"content": "<br />Judicial Watch obtains docs exposing California’s collusion with big tech in 2020 election<br /><br /> April 28, 2021<br /><br />Depending on who you ask, many Americans are still very much under the impression that the 2020 election was rife with election and ballot fraud, as well as election collusion at the hands of big tech and the mainstream media.<br /><br />According to a bombshell report from Judicial Watch, a government watchdog group, a new trove of records obtained through the use of the California Public Records Act (CPRA) allegedly reveals that certain California state officials coordinated with big tech companies like YouTube, Facebook, and Twitter to censor political posts in the lead-up to the 2020 election. <br /><br />The watchdog group obtained some 540 pages of information from the Secretary of State of California which reportedly prove that certain state officials exerted pressure on the aforementioned big tech social media companies to censor certain political posts, including videos posted by Judicial Watch at the time that dealt with the vote by mail controversy and similar videos.<br /><br />Judicial Watch filed the CPRA requests after a report emerged in December which alleged that the California Office of Election Cybersecurity was “surveilling, tracking, and seeking to censor the speech of Americans.”<br /><br />Jenna Dresner, senior public information officer for the Office of Election Cybersecurity, denied that the agency was pressuring big tech companies to take down certain posts, but admitted that they pointed out what the agency believed were “misinformation” posts and only alerted the companies.<br /><br />“We don’t take down posts, that is not our role to play,” Dresner said at the time. “We alert potential sources of misinformation to the social media companies and we let them make that call based on community standards they created.”<br /><br />However, in the documents received recently by Judicial Watch, the group highlights several occasions when the California state agency seemingly asked YouTube to take down various posts, many of which were originated by Judicial Watch president Tom Fitton.<br /><br />Also included within the documents received by the organization was a 30-page “Misinformation Tracking Sheet,” which essentially was a compilation of social media posts that the state agency deemed “misinformation” and were reportedly postings that the state wanted big tech companies to remove.<br /><br />“These documents blow up the big lie that Big Tech censorship is ‘private’ – as the documents show collusion between a whole group of government officials in multiple states to suppress speech about election controversies,” Fitton said of the document dump.",
"to": [
"https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public"
],
"cc": [
"https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1106183683695452168/followers"
],
"tag": [],
"url": "https://www.minds.com/newsfeed/1235286735081046016",
"published": "2021-05-01T17:48:28+00:00",
"source": {
"content": "\nJudicial Watch obtains docs exposing California’s collusion with big tech in 2020 election\n\n April 28, 2021\n\nDepending on who you ask, many Americans are still very much under the impression that the 2020 election was rife with election and ballot fraud, as well as election collusion at the hands of big tech and the mainstream media.\n\nAccording to a bombshell report from Judicial Watch, a government watchdog group, a new trove of records obtained through the use of the California Public Records Act (CPRA) allegedly reveals that certain California state officials coordinated with big tech companies like YouTube, Facebook, and Twitter to censor political posts in the lead-up to the 2020 election. \n\nThe watchdog group obtained some 540 pages of information from the Secretary of State of California which reportedly prove that certain state officials exerted pressure on the aforementioned big tech social media companies to censor certain political posts, including videos posted by Judicial Watch at the time that dealt with the vote by mail controversy and similar videos.\n\nJudicial Watch filed the CPRA requests after a report emerged in December which alleged that the California Office of Election Cybersecurity was “surveilling, tracking, and seeking to censor the speech of Americans.”\n\nJenna Dresner, senior public information officer for the Office of Election Cybersecurity, denied that the agency was pressuring big tech companies to take down certain posts, but admitted that they pointed out what the agency believed were “misinformation” posts and only alerted the companies.\n\n“We don’t take down posts, that is not our role to play,” Dresner said at the time. “We alert potential sources of misinformation to the social media companies and we let them make that call based on community standards they created.”\n\nHowever, in the documents received recently by Judicial Watch, the group highlights several occasions when the California state agency seemingly asked YouTube to take down various posts, many of which were originated by Judicial Watch president Tom Fitton.\n\nAlso included within the documents received by the organization was a 30-page “Misinformation Tracking Sheet,” which essentially was a compilation of social media posts that the state agency deemed “misinformation” and were reportedly postings that the state wanted big tech companies to remove.\n\n“These documents blow up the big lie that Big Tech censorship is ‘private’ – as the documents show collusion between a whole group of government officials in multiple states to suppress speech about election controversies,” Fitton said of the document dump.",
"mediaType": "text/plain"
}
},
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1106183683695452168/entities/urn:activity:1235286735081046016/activity"
},
{
"type": "Announce",
"actor": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1106183683695452168",
"object": {
"type": "Note",
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/870813362777235457/entities/urn:activity:1228173560241766400",
"attributedTo": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/870813362777235457",
"content": "Ron Paul: 'More Guns Plus Less War Equals Real Security'<br /><a href=\"http://www.ronpaulinstitute.org/archives/featured-articles/2014/november/02/more-guns-plus-less-war-equals-real-security/\" target=\"_blank\">http://www.ronpaulinstitute.org/archives/featured-articles/2014/november/02/more-guns-plus-less-war-equals-real-security/</a> ◄─ <a href=\"https://www.minds.com/search?f=top&t=all&q=RonPaul\" title=\"#RonPaul\" class=\"u-url hashtag\" target=\"_blank\">#RonPaul</a> <a href=\"https://www.minds.com/search?f=top&t=all&q=RonPaulSupporters\" title=\"#RonPaulSupporters\" class=\"u-url hashtag\" target=\"_blank\">#RonPaulSupporters</a> ",
"to": [
"https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public"
],
"cc": [
"https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/870813362777235457/followers"
],
"tag": [],
"url": "https://www.minds.com/newsfeed/1228173560241766400",
"published": "2021-04-12T02:43:13+00:00",
"source": {
"content": "Ron Paul: 'More Guns Plus Less War Equals Real Security'\nhttp://www.ronpaulinstitute.org/archives/featured-articles/2014/november/02/more-guns-plus-less-war-equals-real-security/ ◄─ #RonPaul #RonPaulSupporters ",
"mediaType": "text/plain"
}
},
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1106183683695452168/entities/urn:activity:1228177467352064000/activity",
"to": [
"https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public"
],
"cc": [
"https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/870813362777235457",
"https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1106183683695452168/followers"
]
},
{
"type": "Create",
"actor": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1106183683695452168",
"object": {
"type": "Note",
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1106183683695452168/entities/urn:activity:1222280753056493568",
"attributedTo": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1106183683695452168",
"content": "Biden Wants SCOTUS to Let Cops Seize Guns Without a Warrant<br />By C. Douglas Golden<br />Published March 25, 2021 at 8:37am<br />Share<br />Tweet<br />Mewe Share<br />P Share<br />Email<br /><br />The Fourth Amendment protects Americans “against unreasonable searches and seizures.”<br /><br />President Joe Biden’s administration, troublingly, believes warrantless seizure of your firearms is perfectly reasonable even if the reason to believe you pose a danger to yourself or others is practically nonexistent.<br /><br />In the Biden administration’s first amicus brief to the Supreme Court, it urged the high court to uphold a lower court’s ruling in Caniglia v. Strom, a case in which a dubious claim the gun owner could have posed a danger to himself was used as a pretext to take his firearms without a warrant. The lower court found the actions were protected under an exception to the warrant requirement to the Fourth Amendment.<br /><br />The Supreme Court heard oral arguments in the case on Wednesday, according to Forbes.<br /><br />According to an earlier Forbes report, the administration’s brief argued that warrants aren’t “presumptively required when a government official’s action is objectively grounded in a non-investigatory public interest, such as health or safety.”<br /><br />TRENDING: Furious Lindsey Graham Threatens to 'Shut the Senate Down' Over Border Chaos, Issues Challenge to 'Liberal Hypocrites'<br /><br />Moreover, the Department of Justice brief stated that qualified immunity — the doctrine that government officials cannot be held accountable for rights violations unless they violated “clearly established” constitutional or legal rights — should protect the Cranston, Rhode Island, police officers who seized the guns.<br /><br />You may remember that last summer, congressional Democrats fought bitterly to end qualified immunity for police, arguing that it shielded law enforcement officers and agencies from liability. Apparently, though, it’s now OK with the Biden administration — if only for a case that involves seizing weapons.<br /><br />The case dates back to 2015. According to Forbes, a marital dispute broke out between 68-year-old Edward Caniglia and Kim Caniglia, his wife of more than two decades, after Edward Caniglia refused to use a coffee cup his brother-in-law had used previously, saying he might “catch a case of dishonesty” from it.<br /><br />After an hour-long argument, Edward stormed into the bedroom, produced an unloaded handgun, put it on the kitchen table, and asked his wife, “Why don’t you just shoot me and get me out of my misery?”<br />Was this seizure constitutional?<br />6% (95 Votes)<br />94% (1394 Votes)<br /><br />The argument continued, according to Forbes, until Caniglia left to cool off with a drive. When he returned, the fighting resumed and Kim Caniglia eventually left for the night and got a hotel room. When she called the next morning, her husband didn’t answer.<br /><br />She called police to perform a wellness check. When they arrived and talked to Edward, according to Forbes, officers said he “seemed normal,” “was calm for the most part,” and told them “he would never commit suicide.” An officer admitted they “did not consult any specific psychological or psychiatric criteria” when questioning him. They didn’t ask about his history of criminality, violence, self-harm or mental health issues.<br /><br />Officers still believed there was a risk of suicide and wanted Caniglia to seek a psychological evaluation, Forbes reported. He initially refused, but only relented when they said they wouldn’t seize his firearms or ammunition. They were lying. They also lied to his wife and said Edward had assented to the seizures. That persuaded her to lead the officers to the couple’s two handguns, Forbes reported. The guns were then seized.<br /><br />“Critically, when police seized the guns, they didn’t claim it was an emergency or to prevent imminent danger,” Forbes’ Nick Sibilla wrote.<br /><br />“Instead, the officers argued their actions were a form of ‘community caretaking,’ a narrow exception to the Fourth Amendment’s warrant requirement.”<br /><br />RELATED: Fact Check: Biden Falsely Claims Nearly All Trump's Tax Cuts Went to Wealthy<br /><br />That exception was first enumerated in a 1973 Wisconsin case where law enforcement, responding to a drunken driving accident involving a man who identified himself as a Chicago police officer, believed the suspect to have a police service revolver. While they were unable to find it in his rented car, which they had towed, they were able to find several bloody items that eventually led to the man’s conviction for murder. The Supreme Court eventually ruled, according to Justia, that the case constituted an exception that allowed police to search the car without a warrant.<br /><br />In the Caniglia case, according to Forbes, the First Circuit Court of Appeals found that while the community caretaking “doctrine’s reach outside the motor vehicle context is ill-defined,” the gun seizure was warranted because an officer “must act as a master of all emergencies, who is ‘expected to … provide an infinite variety of services to preserve and protect community safety.’”<br /><br />Thus, the community caretaking doctrine is “designed to give police elbow room to take appropriate action” — which, apparently, this qualifies as.<br /><br />Caniglia’s attorneys argued that “extending the community caretaking exception to homes would be anathema to the Fourth Amendment” since it “would grant police a blank check to intrude upon the home.”<br /><br />It’s an argument shared by groups as divergent as the American Conservative Union, the libertarian Cato Institute and the liberal American Civil Liberties Union, which filed a joint friend-of-the-court brief for Caniglia in the case.<br /><br />“Extending the ‘community caretaking’ exception to warrantless searches of the home would allow police officers to bypass the Fourth Amendment’s restrictions in a startling array of circumstances. These are not theoretical concerns,” the brief stated.<br /><br />“In both state and federal courts, everything from loud music to leaky pipes has been used to justify warrantless invasion of the home. Allowing ill-defined notions of ‘community caretaking’ to override the Fourth Amendment is unwise, unmanageable, and unnecessary, and it opens the door to abusive police conduct, including against those who most need society’s protections.”<br /><br />The Biden administration disagrees, arguing in its brief that “[t]he touchstone of the Fourth Amendment is reasonableness” — and that the actions of the officers in the Caniglia case were wholly reasonable.<br /><br />“A warrant should not … be presumptively required when a government official’s action is objectively grounded in a non-investigatory public interest, such as health or safety” as opposed to a criminal case, the brief argued.<br /><br />“The ultimate question in this case is therefore not whether the respondent officers’ actions fit within some narrow warrant exception, but instead whether those actions were reasonable,” the brief stated. “And under all of the circumstances here, they were.”<br /><br />What the Biden administration is standing up for, thus, is that police could seize your guns under the “community caretaking” exception if they could claim that taking the firearms was “objectively grounded in a non-investigatory public interest, such as health or safety.”<br /><br />Note that Rhode Island didn’t have a so-called “red flag” law until 2018, which allows a court to issue an “extreme risk protection order” in cases where it believes individuals present an “imminent risk” to themselves or others. Furthermore, the police officers had convinced Caniglia, under false pretenses, to be evaluated to see if he was an imminent risk. They also lied to his wife, saying he had authorized the seizures.<br /><br />Trained medical practitioners could have decided whether Caniglia posed a self-harm risk before he had access to the guns again. (Incidentally, according to Forbes, he didn’t get them back until he filed a civil rights lawsuit.)<br /><br />The officers hadn’t asked him about his criminal or mental health history. From the Forbes account, they had nothing to go on aside from a dramatic (if stupid) gesture with an unloaded weapon during a marital spat.<br /><br />On that basis alone, under the auspices of “community caretaking,” they took his guns. The Biden administration believes this is “reasonable.” As a backstop, they argue “the Court could affirm the court of appeals’ judgment by concluding that the officers are entitled to qualified immunity.”<br /><br />The administration’s brief was filed Feb. 18, according to Law and Crime. Just over two weeks after the administration filed this brief, the same administration cheered on House Democrats’ decision to reintroduce and pass a police reform bill that would eliminate qualified immunity for police officers. Just saying.<br /><br />During Wednesday’s arguments, justices appeared mixed on the Caniglia case, according to the Forbes report. They shouldn’t be.<br /><br />As the Biden administration’s evident hypocrisy on the “qualified immunity” issue shows, liberals aren’t interested in the legal principles at hand so much as they are intent on using the legal system in whatever way necessary to authorize the government to seize American weapons.<br /><br />The Caniglia case, then, is nothing more than a blatant, hypocritical attack on due process that beseeches the court to expand the “community caretaking” exception to the point where it becomes a de facto invitation to a form of warrantless “red flag” gun seizures — an assault on the Second Amendment by gutting the Fourth.<br /><br />Biden isn’t just going after Americans’ guns via legislation; he wouldn’t mind if the Supreme Court helped authorities take them, either.",
"to": [
"https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public"
],
"cc": [
"https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1106183683695452168/followers"
],
"tag": [],
"url": "https://www.minds.com/newsfeed/1222280753056493568",
"published": "2021-03-26T20:27:20+00:00",
"source": {
"content": "Biden Wants SCOTUS to Let Cops Seize Guns Without a Warrant\nBy C. Douglas Golden\nPublished March 25, 2021 at 8:37am\nShare\nTweet\nMewe Share\nP Share\nEmail\n\nThe Fourth Amendment protects Americans “against unreasonable searches and seizures.”\n\nPresident Joe Biden’s administration, troublingly, believes warrantless seizure of your firearms is perfectly reasonable even if the reason to believe you pose a danger to yourself or others is practically nonexistent.\n\nIn the Biden administration’s first amicus brief to the Supreme Court, it urged the high court to uphold a lower court’s ruling in Caniglia v. Strom, a case in which a dubious claim the gun owner could have posed a danger to himself was used as a pretext to take his firearms without a warrant. The lower court found the actions were protected under an exception to the warrant requirement to the Fourth Amendment.\n\nThe Supreme Court heard oral arguments in the case on Wednesday, according to Forbes.\n\nAccording to an earlier Forbes report, the administration’s brief argued that warrants aren’t “presumptively required when a government official’s action is objectively grounded in a non-investigatory public interest, such as health or safety.”\n\nTRENDING: Furious Lindsey Graham Threatens to 'Shut the Senate Down' Over Border Chaos, Issues Challenge to 'Liberal Hypocrites'\n\nMoreover, the Department of Justice brief stated that qualified immunity — the doctrine that government officials cannot be held accountable for rights violations unless they violated “clearly established” constitutional or legal rights — should protect the Cranston, Rhode Island, police officers who seized the guns.\n\nYou may remember that last summer, congressional Democrats fought bitterly to end qualified immunity for police, arguing that it shielded law enforcement officers and agencies from liability. Apparently, though, it’s now OK with the Biden administration — if only for a case that involves seizing weapons.\n\nThe case dates back to 2015. According to Forbes, a marital dispute broke out between 68-year-old Edward Caniglia and Kim Caniglia, his wife of more than two decades, after Edward Caniglia refused to use a coffee cup his brother-in-law had used previously, saying he might “catch a case of dishonesty” from it.\n\nAfter an hour-long argument, Edward stormed into the bedroom, produced an unloaded handgun, put it on the kitchen table, and asked his wife, “Why don’t you just shoot me and get me out of my misery?”\nWas this seizure constitutional?\n6% (95 Votes)\n94% (1394 Votes)\n\nThe argument continued, according to Forbes, until Caniglia left to cool off with a drive. When he returned, the fighting resumed and Kim Caniglia eventually left for the night and got a hotel room. When she called the next morning, her husband didn’t answer.\n\nShe called police to perform a wellness check. When they arrived and talked to Edward, according to Forbes, officers said he “seemed normal,” “was calm for the most part,” and told them “he would never commit suicide.” An officer admitted they “did not consult any specific psychological or psychiatric criteria” when questioning him. They didn’t ask about his history of criminality, violence, self-harm or mental health issues.\n\nOfficers still believed there was a risk of suicide and wanted Caniglia to seek a psychological evaluation, Forbes reported. He initially refused, but only relented when they said they wouldn’t seize his firearms or ammunition. They were lying. They also lied to his wife and said Edward had assented to the seizures. That persuaded her to lead the officers to the couple’s two handguns, Forbes reported. The guns were then seized.\n\n“Critically, when police seized the guns, they didn’t claim it was an emergency or to prevent imminent danger,” Forbes’ Nick Sibilla wrote.\n\n“Instead, the officers argued their actions were a form of ‘community caretaking,’ a narrow exception to the Fourth Amendment’s warrant requirement.”\n\nRELATED: Fact Check: Biden Falsely Claims Nearly All Trump's Tax Cuts Went to Wealthy\n\nThat exception was first enumerated in a 1973 Wisconsin case where law enforcement, responding to a drunken driving accident involving a man who identified himself as a Chicago police officer, believed the suspect to have a police service revolver. While they were unable to find it in his rented car, which they had towed, they were able to find several bloody items that eventually led to the man’s conviction for murder. The Supreme Court eventually ruled, according to Justia, that the case constituted an exception that allowed police to search the car without a warrant.\n\nIn the Caniglia case, according to Forbes, the First Circuit Court of Appeals found that while the community caretaking “doctrine’s reach outside the motor vehicle context is ill-defined,” the gun seizure was warranted because an officer “must act as a master of all emergencies, who is ‘expected to … provide an infinite variety of services to preserve and protect community safety.’”\n\nThus, the community caretaking doctrine is “designed to give police elbow room to take appropriate action” — which, apparently, this qualifies as.\n\nCaniglia’s attorneys argued that “extending the community caretaking exception to homes would be anathema to the Fourth Amendment” since it “would grant police a blank check to intrude upon the home.”\n\nIt’s an argument shared by groups as divergent as the American Conservative Union, the libertarian Cato Institute and the liberal American Civil Liberties Union, which filed a joint friend-of-the-court brief for Caniglia in the case.\n\n“Extending the ‘community caretaking’ exception to warrantless searches of the home would allow police officers to bypass the Fourth Amendment’s restrictions in a startling array of circumstances. These are not theoretical concerns,” the brief stated.\n\n“In both state and federal courts, everything from loud music to leaky pipes has been used to justify warrantless invasion of the home. Allowing ill-defined notions of ‘community caretaking’ to override the Fourth Amendment is unwise, unmanageable, and unnecessary, and it opens the door to abusive police conduct, including against those who most need society’s protections.”\n\nThe Biden administration disagrees, arguing in its brief that “[t]he touchstone of the Fourth Amendment is reasonableness” — and that the actions of the officers in the Caniglia case were wholly reasonable.\n\n“A warrant should not … be presumptively required when a government official’s action is objectively grounded in a non-investigatory public interest, such as health or safety” as opposed to a criminal case, the brief argued.\n\n“The ultimate question in this case is therefore not whether the respondent officers’ actions fit within some narrow warrant exception, but instead whether those actions were reasonable,” the brief stated. “And under all of the circumstances here, they were.”\n\nWhat the Biden administration is standing up for, thus, is that police could seize your guns under the “community caretaking” exception if they could claim that taking the firearms was “objectively grounded in a non-investigatory public interest, such as health or safety.”\n\nNote that Rhode Island didn’t have a so-called “red flag” law until 2018, which allows a court to issue an “extreme risk protection order” in cases where it believes individuals present an “imminent risk” to themselves or others. Furthermore, the police officers had convinced Caniglia, under false pretenses, to be evaluated to see if he was an imminent risk. They also lied to his wife, saying he had authorized the seizures.\n\nTrained medical practitioners could have decided whether Caniglia posed a self-harm risk before he had access to the guns again. (Incidentally, according to Forbes, he didn’t get them back until he filed a civil rights lawsuit.)\n\nThe officers hadn’t asked him about his criminal or mental health history. From the Forbes account, they had nothing to go on aside from a dramatic (if stupid) gesture with an unloaded weapon during a marital spat.\n\nOn that basis alone, under the auspices of “community caretaking,” they took his guns. The Biden administration believes this is “reasonable.” As a backstop, they argue “the Court could affirm the court of appeals’ judgment by concluding that the officers are entitled to qualified immunity.”\n\nThe administration’s brief was filed Feb. 18, according to Law and Crime. Just over two weeks after the administration filed this brief, the same administration cheered on House Democrats’ decision to reintroduce and pass a police reform bill that would eliminate qualified immunity for police officers. Just saying.\n\nDuring Wednesday’s arguments, justices appeared mixed on the Caniglia case, according to the Forbes report. They shouldn’t be.\n\nAs the Biden administration’s evident hypocrisy on the “qualified immunity” issue shows, liberals aren’t interested in the legal principles at hand so much as they are intent on using the legal system in whatever way necessary to authorize the government to seize American weapons.\n\nThe Caniglia case, then, is nothing more than a blatant, hypocritical attack on due process that beseeches the court to expand the “community caretaking” exception to the point where it becomes a de facto invitation to a form of warrantless “red flag” gun seizures — an assault on the Second Amendment by gutting the Fourth.\n\nBiden isn’t just going after Americans’ guns via legislation; he wouldn’t mind if the Supreme Court helped authorities take them, either.",
"mediaType": "text/plain"
}
},
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1106183683695452168/entities/urn:activity:1222280753056493568/activity"
},
{
"type": "Create",
"actor": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1106183683695452168",
"object": {
"type": "Note",
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1106183683695452168/entities/urn:activity:1222280430597349376",
"attributedTo": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1106183683695452168",
"content": "<br />Pelosi Warns California Democrats Off Running Against Newsom in Recall Election<br /><br /> By<br /> G. McConway<br /> on<br /> March 26, 2021<br /><br />California Governor Gavin Newsom has found himself in a bit of a pickle over his handling of the COVID pandemic.<br /><br />While he initially laughed off the recall effort, the petition garnered roughly two million signatures, far more than was needed to force the recall election.<br /><br />There have now been rumors that numerous California politicians are thinking about squaring off against Newsom to try to unseat him, but House Speaker Pelosi (D-CA) is now putting them all on notice to stay out of Newsom’s way.<br />Don’t Do It<br /><br />Pelosi was very clear that any Democrat running would not get the support of the party except for Newsom.<br /><br />Realistically, Pelosi knows it will be very tough for a Republican to win a recall election, so as long and Democrats have no other option, Newsom should beat this.<br /><br />To that point, when asked if other Democrats should run, she stated, “I think it’s an unnecessary notion.<br /><br />“I don’t think it even rises to the level of an idea.”<br /><br />Pelosi is trying to show a united front behind Newsom, adding, “I think the governor will beat this quite decisively, and we’ll all help him do that.”<br /><br />The recall is all but a lock to make it on the ballot, that would be unless the powers that be figure out a way to disqualify the petition.<br /><br />Assuming the recall goes through, voters will have two questions to answer in the recall.<br /><br />The first question is if Newsom should be recalled.<br /><br />If they believe Newsom should be recalled, they will then be asked who they believe should replace Newsom.<br /><br />As long as Newsom gets the majority support on the first question, the replacement question becomes moot.<br /><br />However, if he fails to get the majority, Republicans could end up stealing the Governor’s Mansion right out from under Democrats.<br /><br />Pelosi, of course, took a shot at Trump supporters regarding the recall, stating, “I do think we will defeat the initiative not because of who started it, the Trumpites, but because of the governor’s leadership.”<br /><br />That did not sit well with recall spokesperson Randy Economy, who stated, “The San Francisco political elite like to protect themselves and have no respect for the people of California during this historical recall.”<br /><br />I am still not of the belief that Newsom will beat the recall. I think it is a long shot, but there is definitely an opening here if Republicans can put the right name out there to replace Newsom.<br /><br />The people of California are fed up with the restrictions and the handling of the pandemic as well as Newsom’s blatant and elitist attitude of thumbing his nose at the very restrictions he has put on his constituents.<br /><br />So, yes, I am saying there is a chance…<br /><br />Source: Politico",
"to": [
"https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public"
],
"cc": [
"https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1106183683695452168/followers"
],
"tag": [],
"url": "https://www.minds.com/newsfeed/1222280430597349376",
"published": "2021-03-26T20:26:03+00:00",
"source": {
"content": "\nPelosi Warns California Democrats Off Running Against Newsom in Recall Election\n\n By\n G. McConway\n on\n March 26, 2021\n\nCalifornia Governor Gavin Newsom has found himself in a bit of a pickle over his handling of the COVID pandemic.\n\nWhile he initially laughed off the recall effort, the petition garnered roughly two million signatures, far more than was needed to force the recall election.\n\nThere have now been rumors that numerous California politicians are thinking about squaring off against Newsom to try to unseat him, but House Speaker Pelosi (D-CA) is now putting them all on notice to stay out of Newsom’s way.\nDon’t Do It\n\nPelosi was very clear that any Democrat running would not get the support of the party except for Newsom.\n\nRealistically, Pelosi knows it will be very tough for a Republican to win a recall election, so as long and Democrats have no other option, Newsom should beat this.\n\nTo that point, when asked if other Democrats should run, she stated, “I think it’s an unnecessary notion.\n\n“I don’t think it even rises to the level of an idea.”\n\nPelosi is trying to show a united front behind Newsom, adding, “I think the governor will beat this quite decisively, and we’ll all help him do that.”\n\nThe recall is all but a lock to make it on the ballot, that would be unless the powers that be figure out a way to disqualify the petition.\n\nAssuming the recall goes through, voters will have two questions to answer in the recall.\n\nThe first question is if Newsom should be recalled.\n\nIf they believe Newsom should be recalled, they will then be asked who they believe should replace Newsom.\n\nAs long as Newsom gets the majority support on the first question, the replacement question becomes moot.\n\nHowever, if he fails to get the majority, Republicans could end up stealing the Governor’s Mansion right out from under Democrats.\n\nPelosi, of course, took a shot at Trump supporters regarding the recall, stating, “I do think we will defeat the initiative not because of who started it, the Trumpites, but because of the governor’s leadership.”\n\nThat did not sit well with recall spokesperson Randy Economy, who stated, “The San Francisco political elite like to protect themselves and have no respect for the people of California during this historical recall.”\n\nI am still not of the belief that Newsom will beat the recall. I think it is a long shot, but there is definitely an opening here if Republicans can put the right name out there to replace Newsom.\n\nThe people of California are fed up with the restrictions and the handling of the pandemic as well as Newsom’s blatant and elitist attitude of thumbing his nose at the very restrictions he has put on his constituents.\n\nSo, yes, I am saying there is a chance…\n\nSource: Politico",
"mediaType": "text/plain"
}
},
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1106183683695452168/entities/urn:activity:1222280430597349376/activity"
},
{
"type": "Create",
"actor": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1106183683695452168",
"object": {
"type": "Note",
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1106183683695452168/entities/urn:activity:1222279600527810560",
"attributedTo": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1106183683695452168",
"content": "Georgia Gov. Brian Kemp (R) signed the Republican-backed “Election Integrity Act of 2021,” or SB 202, into law Thursday as Democratic lawmakers protested the bill.<br /><br />The legislation seeks to tighten up elections and reduce fraud by enforcing conformity across the state, amping up voter ID, restricting drop boxes, and expanding in-person voting, among additional election-related overhauls.<br /><br />“With Senate Bill 202, Georgia will take another step toward ensuring our elections are secure, accessible and fair,” Kemp said Thursday. “Ensuring the integrity of the ballot box isn’t partisan, it’s about protecting the very foundation of who we are as Georgians and Americans.”<br /><br />The bill’s provisions add ID requirements for absentee-by-mail ballots; when Georgians return their ballots, they will be required to use a form of identification to verify who they are. As noted by NPR, this change “replaces the controversial method that has election workers match signatures on applications and ballot envelopes with those on file.”<br /><br />SB 202 also expands in-person voting access, NPR noted: “Current Georgia law requires three weeks of Monday through Friday voting during ‘normal business hours’ and a mandatory Saturday session from 9 a.m. to 4 p.m, with counties allowed to add more hours — including on the weekends — as they saw fit.”",
"to": [
"https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public"
],
"cc": [
"https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1106183683695452168/followers"
],
"tag": [],
"url": "https://www.minds.com/newsfeed/1222279600527810560",
"published": "2021-03-26T20:22:45+00:00",
"source": {
"content": "Georgia Gov. Brian Kemp (R) signed the Republican-backed “Election Integrity Act of 2021,” or SB 202, into law Thursday as Democratic lawmakers protested the bill.\n\nThe legislation seeks to tighten up elections and reduce fraud by enforcing conformity across the state, amping up voter ID, restricting drop boxes, and expanding in-person voting, among additional election-related overhauls.\n\n“With Senate Bill 202, Georgia will take another step toward ensuring our elections are secure, accessible and fair,” Kemp said Thursday. “Ensuring the integrity of the ballot box isn’t partisan, it’s about protecting the very foundation of who we are as Georgians and Americans.”\n\nThe bill’s provisions add ID requirements for absentee-by-mail ballots; when Georgians return their ballots, they will be required to use a form of identification to verify who they are. As noted by NPR, this change “replaces the controversial method that has election workers match signatures on applications and ballot envelopes with those on file.”\n\nSB 202 also expands in-person voting access, NPR noted: “Current Georgia law requires three weeks of Monday through Friday voting during ‘normal business hours’ and a mandatory Saturday session from 9 a.m. to 4 p.m, with counties allowed to add more hours — including on the weekends — as they saw fit.”",
"mediaType": "text/plain"
}
},
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1106183683695452168/entities/urn:activity:1222279600527810560/activity"
},
{
"type": "Create",
"actor": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1106183683695452168",
"object": {
"type": "Note",
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1106183683695452168/entities/urn:activity:1222278864414875648",
"attributedTo": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1106183683695452168",
"content": "The Biden regime’s Cloward and Piven plot to overwhelm the immigration system and destroy what’s left of our border security on the way to legalizing and granting citizenship to millions of new Democratic dependents is proceeding apace.<br /><br />No sooner than Joe Biden took office in January, his handlers had a stack of executive orders for him to sign, many of which were aimed at unwinding President Donald Trump’s successful border and immigration enforcement policies.<br /><br />But even before Biden started ruling by executive fiat, migrants by the tens of thousands were already scheming to traipse to the United States and cross illegally because they knew under the new ‘amnesty’ rules he was putting in place, they would get to stay.<br /><br />Not only has that turned out to be true, but thousands of migrants are being given entire new surroundings: In northern red states along or near the Canadian border.<br /><br />Fox News reports:<br /><br />As crossings along the southern border surge to near-record levels, the Biden administration is considering flying migrants to states near the Canadian border, according to a report. <br /><br />Customs and Border Protection (CBP) requested the plane support from Immigrations and Customs Enforcement (ICE) Friday after 1,000 migrant families and unaccompanied minors crossed the Rio Grande into South Texas Friday morning, Department of Homeland Security (DHS) officials told The Washington Post. Border agents still have another 1,000 migrants they were unable to process last night, according to communications reviewed by the Post. <br /><br />But let’s dare not call this a “crisis” because, in reality, it’s not. What seems chaotic and out-of-control along the U.S.-Mexico border to most observers is really exactly what Biden’s handlers knew would happen and wanted to happen: A crush of new voters.<br /><br />“So, here’s the Democrats’ plan: Flood America’s southern border with millions of illegal aliens, hook them on government aid and eventually turn them into voters. It can’t be more obvious anymore,” Robert Knight wrote in the Washington Times…in July 2019. (Related: WEAPONIZED IMMIGRATION: Biden Regime using biological warfare yet again in West Texas as revenge for Keystone pipeline.)<br /><br /> “Use the courts to strike down any attempts to secure the border. Have judges rule against election integrity laws like voter ID or even the commonsense question about citizenship in the 2020 national census. Once the census count is in, grant more congressional districts and federal funds to jurisdictions swelled with illegals,” he continued, explaining Democrats’ plans and objectives.<br /><br />“Meanwhile, prevent Congress from approving money for border security or even to accommodate the massive crowds. Promise free, unlimited health care for everyone, including illegal aliens. On June 27 during the Democratic debate, all the candidates raised their hands to support this insane proposal that is sure to be heard loud and clear south of the border,” he added.<br /><br />Around the same time, conservative talker and constitutional expert Mark Levin explained the Democratic scheme as well, noting that it would follow standard Neo-Marxist Cloward-Piven strategy.<br /><br />The Blaze reported:<br /><br />Levin read an article to listeners detailing the Cloward-Piven strategy, a political strategy outlined by American sociologists and socialist political activists Richard Cloward and Frances Fox Piven in 1966. The strategy seeks to bring about the fall of capitalism by overwhelming the welfare state to push it into an economic crisis.<br /><br />The objective is to completely discredit existing systems and institutions and then replace them with Marxist/Communist authoritarianism.<br /><br />“In fact, that theory’s working on our border, ladies and gentlemen,” Levin said. “That’s what’s taking place. The very people who have caused these circumstances intentionally, first claiming it was a manufactured crisis, while they were creating the crisis through limits on budget. By obstructing the president on the wall. By undermining ICE, calling for its elimination. By undermining the Border Patrol. By claiming detention centers are concentration camps, while voting against more detention beds. While voting against more administrative law judges. While choking — choking the financial ability to cope with what’s taking place,” he added.<br /><br />“Obstructing the ability to secure the southern border. Then, they become the vocal, outspoken radicals against what they have created — chaos. Anarchy. Overwhelming the system. Because in this case, they want to destroy any lawful, manageable immigration system and have open borders.<br /><br />Without a doubt, the first part of the sinister plan is underway. We now know what comes next.<br /><br />See more reporting like this at OpenBorders.news.<br /><br />Sources include:<br /><br />TheBlaze.com<br /><br />FoxNews.com<br /><br />InvasionUSA.news",
"to": [
"https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public"
],
"cc": [
"https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1106183683695452168/followers"
],
"tag": [],
"url": "https://www.minds.com/newsfeed/1222278864414875648",
"published": "2021-03-26T20:19:50+00:00",
"source": {
"content": "The Biden regime’s Cloward and Piven plot to overwhelm the immigration system and destroy what’s left of our border security on the way to legalizing and granting citizenship to millions of new Democratic dependents is proceeding apace.\n\nNo sooner than Joe Biden took office in January, his handlers had a stack of executive orders for him to sign, many of which were aimed at unwinding President Donald Trump’s successful border and immigration enforcement policies.\n\nBut even before Biden started ruling by executive fiat, migrants by the tens of thousands were already scheming to traipse to the United States and cross illegally because they knew under the new ‘amnesty’ rules he was putting in place, they would get to stay.\n\nNot only has that turned out to be true, but thousands of migrants are being given entire new surroundings: In northern red states along or near the Canadian border.\n\nFox News reports:\n\nAs crossings along the southern border surge to near-record levels, the Biden administration is considering flying migrants to states near the Canadian border, according to a report. \n\nCustoms and Border Protection (CBP) requested the plane support from Immigrations and Customs Enforcement (ICE) Friday after 1,000 migrant families and unaccompanied minors crossed the Rio Grande into South Texas Friday morning, Department of Homeland Security (DHS) officials told The Washington Post. Border agents still have another 1,000 migrants they were unable to process last night, according to communications reviewed by the Post. \n\nBut let’s dare not call this a “crisis” because, in reality, it’s not. What seems chaotic and out-of-control along the U.S.-Mexico border to most observers is really exactly what Biden’s handlers knew would happen and wanted to happen: A crush of new voters.\n\n“So, here’s the Democrats’ plan: Flood America’s southern border with millions of illegal aliens, hook them on government aid and eventually turn them into voters. It can’t be more obvious anymore,” Robert Knight wrote in the Washington Times…in July 2019. (Related: WEAPONIZED IMMIGRATION: Biden Regime using biological warfare yet again in West Texas as revenge for Keystone pipeline.)\n\n “Use the courts to strike down any attempts to secure the border. Have judges rule against election integrity laws like voter ID or even the commonsense question about citizenship in the 2020 national census. Once the census count is in, grant more congressional districts and federal funds to jurisdictions swelled with illegals,” he continued, explaining Democrats’ plans and objectives.\n\n“Meanwhile, prevent Congress from approving money for border security or even to accommodate the massive crowds. Promise free, unlimited health care for everyone, including illegal aliens. On June 27 during the Democratic debate, all the candidates raised their hands to support this insane proposal that is sure to be heard loud and clear south of the border,” he added.\n\nAround the same time, conservative talker and constitutional expert Mark Levin explained the Democratic scheme as well, noting that it would follow standard Neo-Marxist Cloward-Piven strategy.\n\nThe Blaze reported:\n\nLevin read an article to listeners detailing the Cloward-Piven strategy, a political strategy outlined by American sociologists and socialist political activists Richard Cloward and Frances Fox Piven in 1966. The strategy seeks to bring about the fall of capitalism by overwhelming the welfare state to push it into an economic crisis.\n\nThe objective is to completely discredit existing systems and institutions and then replace them with Marxist/Communist authoritarianism.\n\n“In fact, that theory’s working on our border, ladies and gentlemen,” Levin said. “That’s what’s taking place. The very people who have caused these circumstances intentionally, first claiming it was a manufactured crisis, while they were creating the crisis through limits on budget. By obstructing the president on the wall. By undermining ICE, calling for its elimination. By undermining the Border Patrol. By claiming detention centers are concentration camps, while voting against more detention beds. While voting against more administrative law judges. While choking — choking the financial ability to cope with what’s taking place,” he added.\n\n“Obstructing the ability to secure the southern border. Then, they become the vocal, outspoken radicals against what they have created — chaos. Anarchy. Overwhelming the system. Because in this case, they want to destroy any lawful, manageable immigration system and have open borders.\n\nWithout a doubt, the first part of the sinister plan is underway. We now know what comes next.\n\nSee more reporting like this at OpenBorders.news.\n\nSources include:\n\nTheBlaze.com\n\nFoxNews.com\n\nInvasionUSA.news",
"mediaType": "text/plain"
}
},
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1106183683695452168/entities/urn:activity:1222278864414875648/activity"
},
{
"type": "Create",
"actor": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1106183683695452168",
"object": {
"type": "Note",
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1106183683695452168/entities/urn:activity:1222278646733119488",
"attributedTo": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1106183683695452168",
"content": "Prominent vaccine injury lawyer, Robert F. Kennedy Jr. joined up with Del Bigtree of the Informed Consent Action Network to hold the federal government accountable on the issue of vaccine safety.<br /><br />In the 1970s and 1980s, there were mounting medical reports of vaccine injury occurring in children. The reactions were mild to severe and sometimes deadly. The reactions were often the result of a very reactive vaccine adjuvant that caused severe allergic reaction, seizures, or autoimmune conditions. The number of vaccine injuries was so compelling, the U.S. Congress took up the issue in the mid 1980s.<br />Vaccine industry operates above the law, must be held accountable<br /><br />In 1986, President Ronald Reagan signed into law the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act. The law put in motion two important legal precedents. First, it established a government vaccine court to handle specific vaccine injury claims that met certain criteria. This allowed the vaccine industry to continue developing new and existing vaccines, without being sued into bankruptcy. This also protected the vaccine industry from being held criminally liable for manslaughter and causing permanent disability to people. This immunity clause put vaccine companies above the law, allowing the industry to injure people with ineffective products without consequence. Since 1986, this vaccine court has paid out over $4 billion to select families of vaccine injury, with millions of dollars in settlements added each month. There is currently not enough money set aside to compensate all victims of vaccine injury, and multiple thousands of claims go ignored every year.<br /><br />This corrupt precedent also provided the vaccine industry with unlimited opportunities to expand the childhood vaccine schedule, as recommended by the Centers for Disease Control (CDC). After the vaccine industry got legal immunity in 1986, the childhood vaccine schedule ballooned as a result. Emboldened to profit, the vaccine industry pressured the CDC to expand childhood vaccinations to 56 or more doses by the 21st century. As federal authorities approved individual vaccines, one by one, no scientific body or government was studying the effect that multiple and compounding vaccine doses have on developing human beings. (Related: Pfizer is threatening governments around the world and demanding RANSOM to protect against future vaccine injury lawsuits.)<br />The government has been lying about vaccine safety for over three decades<br /><br />The second part of the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act was a more noble aspect of the law. This part required the vaccine companies to report to the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) and Congress every two years, documenting vaccine safety studies and quality control improvements to their products. However, when Robert F. Kennedy Jr and Del Bigtree requested that the HHS provide these thirty-two years’ worth of vaccine safety studies, no response was given from the federal government. This prompted Kennedy and Bigtree to file a court order, requesting the documents.<br /><br />The HHS responded, “The department’s search for records did not locate any records responsive to your request.” This means that HHS has broken the law since 1986 and refuses to hold vaccine companies accountable today. There have been no vaccine safety studies conducted in 32 years! The NIH, the FDA, the mainstream media and the CDC have been lying to the American people for over three decades about vaccine safety, for which there is no documentation.<br /><br />Any government official who uses their position of authority to coerce or intimidate parents to vaccinate their children must now be held accountable. Any vaccine “mandate” or condition of entry is an act of coercion, with no regard to human rights and with no basis in science. Informed consent is essential to any and all medical interventions, especially vaccinations, which have not been tested for safety and continue to cause health issues in both children and adults.<br /><br />Sources include:<br /><br />CairnsNews.org<br /><br />TimesHerald.com<br /><br />NaturalNews.com<br /><br />NaturalNews.com",
"to": [
"https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public"
],
"cc": [
"https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1106183683695452168/followers"
],
"tag": [],
"url": "https://www.minds.com/newsfeed/1222278646733119488",
"published": "2021-03-26T20:18:58+00:00",
"source": {
"content": "Prominent vaccine injury lawyer, Robert F. Kennedy Jr. joined up with Del Bigtree of the Informed Consent Action Network to hold the federal government accountable on the issue of vaccine safety.\n\nIn the 1970s and 1980s, there were mounting medical reports of vaccine injury occurring in children. The reactions were mild to severe and sometimes deadly. The reactions were often the result of a very reactive vaccine adjuvant that caused severe allergic reaction, seizures, or autoimmune conditions. The number of vaccine injuries was so compelling, the U.S. Congress took up the issue in the mid 1980s.\nVaccine industry operates above the law, must be held accountable\n\nIn 1986, President Ronald Reagan signed into law the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act. The law put in motion two important legal precedents. First, it established a government vaccine court to handle specific vaccine injury claims that met certain criteria. This allowed the vaccine industry to continue developing new and existing vaccines, without being sued into bankruptcy. This also protected the vaccine industry from being held criminally liable for manslaughter and causing permanent disability to people. This immunity clause put vaccine companies above the law, allowing the industry to injure people with ineffective products without consequence. Since 1986, this vaccine court has paid out over $4 billion to select families of vaccine injury, with millions of dollars in settlements added each month. There is currently not enough money set aside to compensate all victims of vaccine injury, and multiple thousands of claims go ignored every year.\n\nThis corrupt precedent also provided the vaccine industry with unlimited opportunities to expand the childhood vaccine schedule, as recommended by the Centers for Disease Control (CDC). After the vaccine industry got legal immunity in 1986, the childhood vaccine schedule ballooned as a result. Emboldened to profit, the vaccine industry pressured the CDC to expand childhood vaccinations to 56 or more doses by the 21st century. As federal authorities approved individual vaccines, one by one, no scientific body or government was studying the effect that multiple and compounding vaccine doses have on developing human beings. (Related: Pfizer is threatening governments around the world and demanding RANSOM to protect against future vaccine injury lawsuits.)\nThe government has been lying about vaccine safety for over three decades\n\nThe second part of the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act was a more noble aspect of the law. This part required the vaccine companies to report to the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) and Congress every two years, documenting vaccine safety studies and quality control improvements to their products. However, when Robert F. Kennedy Jr and Del Bigtree requested that the HHS provide these thirty-two years’ worth of vaccine safety studies, no response was given from the federal government. This prompted Kennedy and Bigtree to file a court order, requesting the documents.\n\nThe HHS responded, “The department’s search for records did not locate any records responsive to your request.” This means that HHS has broken the law since 1986 and refuses to hold vaccine companies accountable today. There have been no vaccine safety studies conducted in 32 years! The NIH, the FDA, the mainstream media and the CDC have been lying to the American people for over three decades about vaccine safety, for which there is no documentation.\n\nAny government official who uses their position of authority to coerce or intimidate parents to vaccinate their children must now be held accountable. Any vaccine “mandate” or condition of entry is an act of coercion, with no regard to human rights and with no basis in science. Informed consent is essential to any and all medical interventions, especially vaccinations, which have not been tested for safety and continue to cause health issues in both children and adults.\n\nSources include:\n\nCairnsNews.org\n\nTimesHerald.com\n\nNaturalNews.com\n\nNaturalNews.com",
"mediaType": "text/plain"
}
},
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1106183683695452168/entities/urn:activity:1222278646733119488/activity"
},
{
"type": "Create",
"actor": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1106183683695452168",
"object": {
"type": "Note",
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1106183683695452168/entities/urn:activity:1222278543708430336",
"attributedTo": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1106183683695452168",
"content": "Prominent vaccine injury lawyer, Robert F. Kennedy Jr. joined up with Del Bigtree of the Informed Consent Action Network to hold the federal government accountable on the issue of vaccine safety.<br /><br />In the 1970s and 1980s, there were mounting medical reports of vaccine injury occurring in children. The reactions were mild to severe and sometimes deadly. The reactions were often the result of a very reactive vaccine adjuvant that caused severe allergic reaction, seizures, or autoimmune conditions. The number of vaccine injuries was so compelling, the U.S. Congress took up the issue in the mid 1980s.<br />Vaccine industry operates above the law, must be held accountable<br /><br />In 1986, President Ronald Reagan signed into law the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act. The law put in motion two important legal precedents. First, it established a government vaccine court to handle specific vaccine injury claims that met certain criteria. This allowed the vaccine industry to continue developing new and existing vaccines, without being sued into bankruptcy. This also protected the vaccine industry from being held criminally liable for manslaughter and causing permanent disability to people. This immunity clause put vaccine companies above the law, allowing the industry to injure people with ineffective products without consequence. Since 1986, this vaccine court has paid out over $4 billion to select families of vaccine injury, with millions of dollars in settlements added each month. There is currently not enough money set aside to compensate all victims of vaccine injury, and multiple thousands of claims go ignored every year.<br /><br />This corrupt precedent also provided the vaccine industry with unlimited opportunities to expand the childhood vaccine schedule, as recommended by the Centers for Disease Control (CDC). After the vaccine industry got legal immunity in 1986, the childhood vaccine schedule ballooned as a result. Emboldened to profit, the vaccine industry pressured the CDC to expand childhood vaccinations to 56 or more doses by the 21st century. As federal authorities approved individual vaccines, one by one, no scientific body or government was studying the effect that multiple and compounding vaccine doses have on developing human beings. (Related: Pfizer is threatening governments around the world and demanding RANSOM to protect against future vaccine injury lawsuits.)<br />The government has been lying about vaccine safety for over three decades<br /><br />The second part of the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act was a more noble aspect of the law. This part required the vaccine companies to report to the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) and Congress every two years, documenting vaccine safety studies and quality control improvements to their products. However, when Robert F. Kennedy Jr and Del Bigtree requested that the HHS provide these thirty-two years’ worth of vaccine safety studies, no response was given from the federal government. This prompted Kennedy and Bigtree to file a court order, requesting the documents.<br /><br />The HHS responded, “The department’s search for records did not locate any records responsive to your request.” This means that HHS has broken the law since 1986 and refuses to hold vaccine companies accountable today. There have been no vaccine safety studies conducted in 32 years! The NIH, the FDA, the mainstream media and the CDC have been lying to the American people for over three decades about vaccine safety, for which there is no documentation.<br /><br />Any government official who uses their position of authority to coerce or intimidate parents to vaccinate their children must now be held accountable. Any vaccine “mandate” or condition of entry is an act of coercion, with no regard to human rights and with no basis in science. Informed consent is essential to any and all medical interventions, especially vaccinations, which have not been tested for safety and continue to cause health issues in both children and adults.<br /><br />Sources include:<br /><br />CairnsNews.org<br /><br />TimesHerald.com<br /><br />NaturalNews.com<br /><br />NaturalNews.com",
"to": [
"https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public"
],
"cc": [
"https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1106183683695452168/followers"
],
"tag": [],
"url": "https://www.minds.com/newsfeed/1222278543708430336",
"published": "2021-03-26T20:18:33+00:00",
"source": {
"content": "Prominent vaccine injury lawyer, Robert F. Kennedy Jr. joined up with Del Bigtree of the Informed Consent Action Network to hold the federal government accountable on the issue of vaccine safety.\n\nIn the 1970s and 1980s, there were mounting medical reports of vaccine injury occurring in children. The reactions were mild to severe and sometimes deadly. The reactions were often the result of a very reactive vaccine adjuvant that caused severe allergic reaction, seizures, or autoimmune conditions. The number of vaccine injuries was so compelling, the U.S. Congress took up the issue in the mid 1980s.\nVaccine industry operates above the law, must be held accountable\n\nIn 1986, President Ronald Reagan signed into law the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act. The law put in motion two important legal precedents. First, it established a government vaccine court to handle specific vaccine injury claims that met certain criteria. This allowed the vaccine industry to continue developing new and existing vaccines, without being sued into bankruptcy. This also protected the vaccine industry from being held criminally liable for manslaughter and causing permanent disability to people. This immunity clause put vaccine companies above the law, allowing the industry to injure people with ineffective products without consequence. Since 1986, this vaccine court has paid out over $4 billion to select families of vaccine injury, with millions of dollars in settlements added each month. There is currently not enough money set aside to compensate all victims of vaccine injury, and multiple thousands of claims go ignored every year.\n\nThis corrupt precedent also provided the vaccine industry with unlimited opportunities to expand the childhood vaccine schedule, as recommended by the Centers for Disease Control (CDC). After the vaccine industry got legal immunity in 1986, the childhood vaccine schedule ballooned as a result. Emboldened to profit, the vaccine industry pressured the CDC to expand childhood vaccinations to 56 or more doses by the 21st century. As federal authorities approved individual vaccines, one by one, no scientific body or government was studying the effect that multiple and compounding vaccine doses have on developing human beings. (Related: Pfizer is threatening governments around the world and demanding RANSOM to protect against future vaccine injury lawsuits.)\nThe government has been lying about vaccine safety for over three decades\n\nThe second part of the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act was a more noble aspect of the law. This part required the vaccine companies to report to the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) and Congress every two years, documenting vaccine safety studies and quality control improvements to their products. However, when Robert F. Kennedy Jr and Del Bigtree requested that the HHS provide these thirty-two years’ worth of vaccine safety studies, no response was given from the federal government. This prompted Kennedy and Bigtree to file a court order, requesting the documents.\n\nThe HHS responded, “The department’s search for records did not locate any records responsive to your request.” This means that HHS has broken the law since 1986 and refuses to hold vaccine companies accountable today. There have been no vaccine safety studies conducted in 32 years! The NIH, the FDA, the mainstream media and the CDC have been lying to the American people for over three decades about vaccine safety, for which there is no documentation.\n\nAny government official who uses their position of authority to coerce or intimidate parents to vaccinate their children must now be held accountable. Any vaccine “mandate” or condition of entry is an act of coercion, with no regard to human rights and with no basis in science. Informed consent is essential to any and all medical interventions, especially vaccinations, which have not been tested for safety and continue to cause health issues in both children and adults.\n\nSources include:\n\nCairnsNews.org\n\nTimesHerald.com\n\nNaturalNews.com\n\nNaturalNews.com",
"mediaType": "text/plain"
}
},
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1106183683695452168/entities/urn:activity:1222278543708430336/activity"
},
{
"type": "Create",
"actor": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1106183683695452168",
"object": {
"type": "Note",
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1106183683695452168/entities/urn:activity:1222276989243887616",
"attributedTo": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1106183683695452168",
"content": "Joe Biden isn’t going to like this.<br /><br />The administration and its Democrat allies were hoping no one would notice.<br /><br />But Joe Biden got called out for allowing this child sex trafficking ring.<br /><br />A delegation of Republican congressmen headed to the southern border to highlight the catastrophe Joe Biden unleashed with his open borders policies and messaging.<br /><br />Freshman Congressman Burgess Owens blasted Biden for allowing child sex trafficking rings to flourish as smugglers and cartels exercise operational control over the southern border.<br /><br />Owens compared the trafficking occurring due to Biden’s neglect to the worst evils in human history.<br /><br />“Human trafficking, my friends, is slavery,” Owens declared.<br /><br />Owens described the horror show cartels and smugglers subject women and girls to noting that “30 percent of the women and girls coming through this [migration] process are going to be raped.”<br /><br />Joe Biden’s offered no answers to the crisis at the border.<br /><br />From Biden on down, administration officials refuse to even call the debacle at the southern border a crisis.<br /><br />Owens railed on the administration blasting their inaction.<br /><br />“We can’t standby and let that happen. We have boys and girls as young as six or seven years old being pushed into sex trafficking,” Owens declared.<br /><br />Owens ripped Biden for causing this crisis by feeding the perception among illegal aliens that the border was open through his words and deeds.<br /><br />“President Biden should be ashamed of himself. Ashamed. This was preventable,” Owens added that, “There are people suffering, going through misery because they were given false hope.”<br /><br />Throughout the campaign Biden promised a “humane” immigration system.<br /><br />Once in office Biden signed executive orders dismantling Donald Trump’s successful border policies such as ending the “Remain in Mexico” protocols and ending third party safe harbor agreements that forced illegal aliens to apply for asylum in third party nations before coming to the United States.<br /><br />Congressman Mario Diaz-Balart doubled down on Owens’ attacks on Biden for inviting a sex trafficking crisis.<br /><br />“This is a humanitarian crisis. We are talking about thousands of girls who are being raped in the course of trying to reach the southern border. We are talking about the fact that now the United States, by this policy and rhetoric of President Biden’s administration … [is] financing the coyotes and the human trafficking cartels on the southern border of the United States,” Diaz-Balart stated.<br /><br />The Biden administration admitted a record number of illegal alien children are streaming into the country.<br /><br />And Biden officials concede that the number of illegal aliens overall attempting to crash the border will be the largest number in 20 years.<br /><br />But instead of taking action to put a stop to a dangerous situation where smugglers and coyotes are roping illegal alien children into sex trafficking rings, the Biden administration is paralyzed by its open borders’ ideology.<br /><br />If you want American Patriot Daily to keep you up to date on any new developments in this ongoing story and the rest of the breaking news in politics, please bookmark our site, consider making us your homepage and forward our content with your friends on social media and email.",
"to": [
"https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public"
],
"cc": [
"https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1106183683695452168/followers"
],
"tag": [],
"url": "https://www.minds.com/newsfeed/1222276989243887616",
"published": "2021-03-26T20:12:23+00:00",
"source": {
"content": "Joe Biden isn’t going to like this.\n\nThe administration and its Democrat allies were hoping no one would notice.\n\nBut Joe Biden got called out for allowing this child sex trafficking ring.\n\nA delegation of Republican congressmen headed to the southern border to highlight the catastrophe Joe Biden unleashed with his open borders policies and messaging.\n\nFreshman Congressman Burgess Owens blasted Biden for allowing child sex trafficking rings to flourish as smugglers and cartels exercise operational control over the southern border.\n\nOwens compared the trafficking occurring due to Biden’s neglect to the worst evils in human history.\n\n“Human trafficking, my friends, is slavery,” Owens declared.\n\nOwens described the horror show cartels and smugglers subject women and girls to noting that “30 percent of the women and girls coming through this [migration] process are going to be raped.”\n\nJoe Biden’s offered no answers to the crisis at the border.\n\nFrom Biden on down, administration officials refuse to even call the debacle at the southern border a crisis.\n\nOwens railed on the administration blasting their inaction.\n\n“We can’t standby and let that happen. We have boys and girls as young as six or seven years old being pushed into sex trafficking,” Owens declared.\n\nOwens ripped Biden for causing this crisis by feeding the perception among illegal aliens that the border was open through his words and deeds.\n\n“President Biden should be ashamed of himself. Ashamed. This was preventable,” Owens added that, “There are people suffering, going through misery because they were given false hope.”\n\nThroughout the campaign Biden promised a “humane” immigration system.\n\nOnce in office Biden signed executive orders dismantling Donald Trump’s successful border policies such as ending the “Remain in Mexico” protocols and ending third party safe harbor agreements that forced illegal aliens to apply for asylum in third party nations before coming to the United States.\n\nCongressman Mario Diaz-Balart doubled down on Owens’ attacks on Biden for inviting a sex trafficking crisis.\n\n“This is a humanitarian crisis. We are talking about thousands of girls who are being raped in the course of trying to reach the southern border. We are talking about the fact that now the United States, by this policy and rhetoric of President Biden’s administration … [is] financing the coyotes and the human trafficking cartels on the southern border of the United States,” Diaz-Balart stated.\n\nThe Biden administration admitted a record number of illegal alien children are streaming into the country.\n\nAnd Biden officials concede that the number of illegal aliens overall attempting to crash the border will be the largest number in 20 years.\n\nBut instead of taking action to put a stop to a dangerous situation where smugglers and coyotes are roping illegal alien children into sex trafficking rings, the Biden administration is paralyzed by its open borders’ ideology.\n\nIf you want American Patriot Daily to keep you up to date on any new developments in this ongoing story and the rest of the breaking news in politics, please bookmark our site, consider making us your homepage and forward our content with your friends on social media and email.",
"mediaType": "text/plain"
}
},
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1106183683695452168/entities/urn:activity:1222276989243887616/activity"
},
{
"type": "Create",
"actor": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1106183683695452168",
"object": {
"type": "Note",
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1106183683695452168/entities/urn:activity:1221913345902903296",
"attributedTo": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1106183683695452168",
"content": "<br />Pelosi to keep Capitol shut down for foreseeable future<br /><br /> March 24, 2021<br /><br />In the wake of the Jan. 6 Capitol violence, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) played a role in calling for a protective, prison-like fence to be installed around the Capitol complex, which was met with criticism over the following weeks and months, given that none of the reported “threats” ever came to fruition.<br /><br />According to the Washington Examiner, it was recently announced that the outer ring of the fencing is finally being removed and should be finished by the end of the month. However, those in charge of security with concern to the U.S. Capitol, which includes Pelosi, have announced that both the Capitol and U.S. Senate offices will remain closed to the public for the foreseeable future. <br /><br />An inner-ring of security fencing will reportedly stay in place indefinitely, though unlike what some predicted, there hasn’t been any security events since Jan. 6.<br /><br />“The inner perimeter fence, around the Capitol Building, is still in place, while the Department works with our congressional stakeholders and law enforcement partners to strengthen our security posture,” a statement from the U.S. Capitol police said, according to The Hill.<br /><br />Registered visitors and staffers who come to the complex and to the Senate offices for official business will be guided through barricaded checkpoints, according to a memo reportedly sent to staffers on the Hill by Capitol Police.<br /><br />A number of Republicans have expressed concern and lodged complaints about the current security situation at the Capitol, claiming that it prevents constituents from visiting and disrupts organizations and other groups from entering the complex to observe the day-to-day business that takes place there.<br /><br />“No constituents can come and see us. No groups or organizations can come and see us. Nobody can sit in the gallery and watch us. They’re not having regular committee hearings. They’re cramming all this stuff through,” said Rep. Andy Biggs (R-AZ).<br /><br />Rep. Thomas Massie (R-KY) has also been publicly critical of the intense security measures still in place, calling it a “joke” while saying that “closing the People’s House to the people is an evolutionary cul-de-sac.”<br /><br />Many on social media and in the halls of Congress have suggested that Pelosi is encouraging the seemingly overdone security measures as nothing more than a fear-mongering political tactic, which is an opinion that, at this point, would be difficult with which to disagree.",
"to": [
"https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public"
],
"cc": [
"https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1106183683695452168/followers"
],
"tag": [],
"url": "https://www.minds.com/newsfeed/1221913345902903296",
"published": "2021-03-25T20:07:23+00:00",
"source": {
"content": "\nPelosi to keep Capitol shut down for foreseeable future\n\n March 24, 2021\n\nIn the wake of the Jan. 6 Capitol violence, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) played a role in calling for a protective, prison-like fence to be installed around the Capitol complex, which was met with criticism over the following weeks and months, given that none of the reported “threats” ever came to fruition.\n\nAccording to the Washington Examiner, it was recently announced that the outer ring of the fencing is finally being removed and should be finished by the end of the month. However, those in charge of security with concern to the U.S. Capitol, which includes Pelosi, have announced that both the Capitol and U.S. Senate offices will remain closed to the public for the foreseeable future. \n\nAn inner-ring of security fencing will reportedly stay in place indefinitely, though unlike what some predicted, there hasn’t been any security events since Jan. 6.\n\n“The inner perimeter fence, around the Capitol Building, is still in place, while the Department works with our congressional stakeholders and law enforcement partners to strengthen our security posture,” a statement from the U.S. Capitol police said, according to The Hill.\n\nRegistered visitors and staffers who come to the complex and to the Senate offices for official business will be guided through barricaded checkpoints, according to a memo reportedly sent to staffers on the Hill by Capitol Police.\n\nA number of Republicans have expressed concern and lodged complaints about the current security situation at the Capitol, claiming that it prevents constituents from visiting and disrupts organizations and other groups from entering the complex to observe the day-to-day business that takes place there.\n\n“No constituents can come and see us. No groups or organizations can come and see us. Nobody can sit in the gallery and watch us. They’re not having regular committee hearings. They’re cramming all this stuff through,” said Rep. Andy Biggs (R-AZ).\n\nRep. Thomas Massie (R-KY) has also been publicly critical of the intense security measures still in place, calling it a “joke” while saying that “closing the People’s House to the people is an evolutionary cul-de-sac.”\n\nMany on social media and in the halls of Congress have suggested that Pelosi is encouraging the seemingly overdone security measures as nothing more than a fear-mongering political tactic, which is an opinion that, at this point, would be difficult with which to disagree.",
"mediaType": "text/plain"
}
},
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1106183683695452168/entities/urn:activity:1221913345902903296/activity"
},
{
"type": "Create",
"actor": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1106183683695452168",
"object": {
"type": "Note",
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1106183683695452168/entities/urn:activity:1221913040935059456",
"attributedTo": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1106183683695452168",
"content": "<br />Former Operation Warp Speed chief says Biden is largely following Trump’s lead on COVID vaccine rollout<br /><br /> March 22, 2021<br /> by<br /> Ryan Ledendecker<br /><br />President Joe Biden and his administration haven’t proven that they’re good at much, but one area they seem to particularly excel in is taking credit for things that former President Donald Trump set into motion, such as the rollout of COVID-19 vaccines. Now, however, at least one former Trump official is crying foul.<br /><br />According to the Washington Examiner, Moncef Slaoui made clear in a recent interview that Biden’s coronavirus vaccine distribution plan is composed of roughly “90%” of what Trump already had in place. Slaoui, of course, is likely the most in-the-know person on the subject, given that he is the former leader of Operation Warp Speed.<br />“We had plans”<br /><br />During a recent interview on CBS’s Face the Nation, Slaoui rebuffed the criticism leveled against the Trump administration on whether they contracted enough vaccines against the coronavirus for the American public, among other issues surrounding the vaccination program.<br /><br />The former director made crystal clear that the Biden administration’s success in the realm of inoculations is nothing more than a piggyback ride on Trump’s coattails.<br /><br />“I do think that we had plans, and in fact, 90% of what’s happening now is the plan that we had,” Slaoui said, according to the Examiner.<br /><br />“Of course, the first thing was to accelerate the development of the vaccine. We contracted specifically 100 million doses of vaccine, but also built into the contract options to acquire more vaccines once we knew they are effective,” he added.<br /><br />“But I think what’s happening is, frankly, what was the plan. Substantially what was the plan,” Slaoui said.<br />Failure to communicate?<br /><br />Later in his interview, Slaoui conceded that he believes the messaging in the early stages of the pandemic concerning potential vaccines could have been clearer, in the sense that it should have been stated more explicitly that the rollout would be slow, but steady.<br /><br />“It was impossible to have enough vaccine doses quickly enough compared to the expectations. So we were unable, as we communicated in the month of November and December and January, to — to manage the expectation,” Slaoui said, as the Examiner reported.<br /><br />The former Trump official also credited the Biden administration for the mobilization of large vaccination sites at places like sports arenas and theme parks, but stuck to his guns as far as who he believes is was the catalyst that made it all possible.<br /><br />“The bulk of vaccine distribution is happening in the health care centers and now in the pharmacies. And that was all part of the plan,” Slaoui said, referring to announcements last year from the Trump White House about an unprecedented partnership between the U.S. government and the private pharmacy industry.<br /><br />Biden and his supporters can believe whoever they want, but tens of millions of Americans who were paying attention last November know that Trump and his team easily deserve a bulk of the credit for making a robust COVID-19 vaccine rollout possible.",
"to": [
"https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public"
],
"cc": [
"https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1106183683695452168/followers"
],
"tag": [],
"url": "https://www.minds.com/newsfeed/1221913040935059456",
"published": "2021-03-25T20:06:11+00:00",
"source": {
"content": "\nFormer Operation Warp Speed chief says Biden is largely following Trump’s lead on COVID vaccine rollout\n\n March 22, 2021\n by\n Ryan Ledendecker\n\nPresident Joe Biden and his administration haven’t proven that they’re good at much, but one area they seem to particularly excel in is taking credit for things that former President Donald Trump set into motion, such as the rollout of COVID-19 vaccines. Now, however, at least one former Trump official is crying foul.\n\nAccording to the Washington Examiner, Moncef Slaoui made clear in a recent interview that Biden’s coronavirus vaccine distribution plan is composed of roughly “90%” of what Trump already had in place. Slaoui, of course, is likely the most in-the-know person on the subject, given that he is the former leader of Operation Warp Speed.\n“We had plans”\n\nDuring a recent interview on CBS’s Face the Nation, Slaoui rebuffed the criticism leveled against the Trump administration on whether they contracted enough vaccines against the coronavirus for the American public, among other issues surrounding the vaccination program.\n\nThe former director made crystal clear that the Biden administration’s success in the realm of inoculations is nothing more than a piggyback ride on Trump’s coattails.\n\n“I do think that we had plans, and in fact, 90% of what’s happening now is the plan that we had,” Slaoui said, according to the Examiner.\n\n“Of course, the first thing was to accelerate the development of the vaccine. We contracted specifically 100 million doses of vaccine, but also built into the contract options to acquire more vaccines once we knew they are effective,” he added.\n\n“But I think what’s happening is, frankly, what was the plan. Substantially what was the plan,” Slaoui said.\nFailure to communicate?\n\nLater in his interview, Slaoui conceded that he believes the messaging in the early stages of the pandemic concerning potential vaccines could have been clearer, in the sense that it should have been stated more explicitly that the rollout would be slow, but steady.\n\n“It was impossible to have enough vaccine doses quickly enough compared to the expectations. So we were unable, as we communicated in the month of November and December and January, to — to manage the expectation,” Slaoui said, as the Examiner reported.\n\nThe former Trump official also credited the Biden administration for the mobilization of large vaccination sites at places like sports arenas and theme parks, but stuck to his guns as far as who he believes is was the catalyst that made it all possible.\n\n“The bulk of vaccine distribution is happening in the health care centers and now in the pharmacies. And that was all part of the plan,” Slaoui said, referring to announcements last year from the Trump White House about an unprecedented partnership between the U.S. government and the private pharmacy industry.\n\nBiden and his supporters can believe whoever they want, but tens of millions of Americans who were paying attention last November know that Trump and his team easily deserve a bulk of the credit for making a robust COVID-19 vaccine rollout possible.",
"mediaType": "text/plain"
}
},
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1106183683695452168/entities/urn:activity:1221913040935059456/activity"
},
{
"type": "Create",
"actor": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1106183683695452168",
"object": {
"type": "Note",
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1106183683695452168/entities/urn:activity:1221912757684649984",
"attributedTo": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1106183683695452168",
"content": "BREAKING: Obama Back In White House – GOP Is Stunned<br /><br /> March 24, 2021<br /><br />Former President Barack Obama is back in the White House. The GOP is stunned — he keeps finding ways to control the DC swamp.<br /><br />According to White House Press Secretary Jen Psaki, Obama and President Joe Biden “consult and talk about a range of issues and I would expect that continues through the course of President Biden’s presidency.”<br /><br />Truly, this has been Obama’s third term, but far more radical. The political climate is so polarized now, with the far-left steering the Democratic Party, Biden is doing things Obama only dreamed about.<br /><br />For the most part, it sounds like they communicate by phone. But Psaki noted that “if President Obama had been here, you would all know,” referring to an in-person visit from the former president.<br /><br />Psaki delivered these remarks to reporters during a press conference. She was asked how many times the two leaders have spoken, and all she could say is that they “keep in regular touch.”<br /><br />So far, she has been less than impressive — oftentimes unable to answer simple questions. By contrast, White House Press Secretary Kayleigh McEnany was always on point during her time with the Trump administration.",
"to": [
"https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public"
],
"cc": [
"https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1106183683695452168/followers"
],
"tag": [],
"url": "https://www.minds.com/newsfeed/1221912757684649984",
"published": "2021-03-25T20:05:03+00:00",
"source": {
"content": "BREAKING: Obama Back In White House – GOP Is Stunned\n\n March 24, 2021\n\nFormer President Barack Obama is back in the White House. The GOP is stunned — he keeps finding ways to control the DC swamp.\n\nAccording to White House Press Secretary Jen Psaki, Obama and President Joe Biden “consult and talk about a range of issues and I would expect that continues through the course of President Biden’s presidency.”\n\nTruly, this has been Obama’s third term, but far more radical. The political climate is so polarized now, with the far-left steering the Democratic Party, Biden is doing things Obama only dreamed about.\n\nFor the most part, it sounds like they communicate by phone. But Psaki noted that “if President Obama had been here, you would all know,” referring to an in-person visit from the former president.\n\nPsaki delivered these remarks to reporters during a press conference. She was asked how many times the two leaders have spoken, and all she could say is that they “keep in regular touch.”\n\nSo far, she has been less than impressive — oftentimes unable to answer simple questions. By contrast, White House Press Secretary Kayleigh McEnany was always on point during her time with the Trump administration.",
"mediaType": "text/plain"
}
},
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1106183683695452168/entities/urn:activity:1221912757684649984/activity"
},
{
"type": "Create",
"actor": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1106183683695452168",
"object": {
"type": "Note",
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1106183683695452168/entities/urn:activity:1221912422413369344",
"attributedTo": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1106183683695452168",
"content": "BREAKING: Joe Biden GUILTY – Evidence Shocks Entire Nation<br /><br /> March 24, 2021<br /><br />President Joe Biden was just found guilty. The evidence has shocked the entire nation — millions of people can’t believe it.<br /><br />The border crisis has reached a boiling point and liberals can no longer hide the truth. Author and congressional candidate Buzz Patterson said it best: “Hypocrites!”<br /><br />“Where is <a class=\"u-url mention\" href=\"https://www.minds.com/AOC\" target=\"_blank\">@AOC</a>?” he tweeted, referring to the far-left congresswoman from New York who infamously took a grief-stricken photo at a border facility. Apparently, she no longer cares about “kids in cages.”<br /><br />“Where are the CNN idiots wailing and whining about ‘children being ripped from the arms of their mothers?'” Patterson continued. “More importantly, where is <a class=\"u-url mention\" href=\"https://www.minds.com/JoeBiden\" target=\"_blank\">@JoeBiden</a>?”<br /><br />Hypocrites, indeed. The photos released by Rep. Henry Cuellar of Texas — a Democrat, no less — reveal a border crisis that we have never seen before. People are packed together in poor conditions.<br /><br />But this is what was bound to happen after Biden overturned all of President Donald Trump’s border security measures — we ended up with a surge of illegal immigration. It is a disastrous situation.",
"to": [
"https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public"
],
"cc": [
"https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1106183683695452168/followers"
],
"tag": [
{
"type": "Mention",
"href": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/500129429373071378",
"name": "@JoeBiden"
}
],
"url": "https://www.minds.com/newsfeed/1221912422413369344",
"published": "2021-03-25T20:03:43+00:00",
"source": {
"content": "BREAKING: Joe Biden GUILTY – Evidence Shocks Entire Nation\n\n March 24, 2021\n\nPresident Joe Biden was just found guilty. The evidence has shocked the entire nation — millions of people can’t believe it.\n\nThe border crisis has reached a boiling point and liberals can no longer hide the truth. Author and congressional candidate Buzz Patterson said it best: “Hypocrites!”\n\n“Where is @AOC?” he tweeted, referring to the far-left congresswoman from New York who infamously took a grief-stricken photo at a border facility. Apparently, she no longer cares about “kids in cages.”\n\n“Where are the CNN idiots wailing and whining about ‘children being ripped from the arms of their mothers?'” Patterson continued. “More importantly, where is @JoeBiden?”\n\nHypocrites, indeed. The photos released by Rep. Henry Cuellar of Texas — a Democrat, no less — reveal a border crisis that we have never seen before. People are packed together in poor conditions.\n\nBut this is what was bound to happen after Biden overturned all of President Donald Trump’s border security measures — we ended up with a surge of illegal immigration. It is a disastrous situation.",
"mediaType": "text/plain"
}
},
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1106183683695452168/entities/urn:activity:1221912422413369344/activity"
}
],
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1106183683695452168/outbox",
"partOf": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1106183683695452168/outboxoutbox"
}