A small tool to view real-world ActivityPub objects as JSON! Enter a URL
or username from Mastodon or a similar service below, and we'll send a
request with
the right
Accept
header
to the server to view the underlying object.
{
"@context": "https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams",
"type": "OrderedCollectionPage",
"orderedItems": [
{
"type": "Announce",
"actor": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1094073377875828742",
"object": {
"type": "Note",
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/681485376904241167/entities/urn:activity:1531035780577759239",
"attributedTo": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/681485376904241167",
"content": "The first thing that comes off the desk of a <a class=\"u-url mention\" href=\"https://www.minds.com/TrumpX\" target=\"_blank\">@TrumpX</a> presidency is <a href=\"https://www.minds.com/search?f=top&t=all&q=TheLastExecutiveOrder\" title=\"#TheLastExecutiveOrder\" class=\"u-url hashtag\" target=\"_blank\">#TheLastExecutiveOrder</a> which UNSUSPENDS the Constitution of 1789 making the Act of 1871 (as well as every code, statute, rule, regulation, alphabet agency, and piece of pretended legislation that stems from it) not only null, but an absolute nullity, as if they never existed.<br /><a href=\"https://www.minds.com/search?f=top&t=all&q=TrumpX2024\" title=\"#TrumpX2024\" class=\"u-url hashtag\" target=\"_blank\">#TrumpX2024</a>",
"to": [
"https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public"
],
"cc": [
"https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/681485376904241167/followers",
"https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/826450365988741121"
],
"tag": [
{
"type": "Mention",
"href": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/681485376904241167",
"name": "@TrumpX"
}
],
"url": "https://www.minds.com/newsfeed/1531035780577759239",
"published": "2023-07-26T20:29:34+00:00",
"inReplyTo": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/826450365988741121/entities/urn:activity:1526519776204034055",
"source": {
"content": "The first thing that comes off the desk of a @TrumpX presidency is #TheLastExecutiveOrder which UNSUSPENDS the Constitution of 1789 making the Act of 1871 (as well as every code, statute, rule, regulation, alphabet agency, and piece of pretended legislation that stems from it) not only null, but an absolute nullity, as if they never existed.\n#TrumpX2024",
"mediaType": "text/plain"
}
},
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1094073377875828742/entities/urn:activity:1537232242533732368/activity",
"to": [
"https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public"
],
"cc": [
"https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/681485376904241167",
"https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1094073377875828742/followers"
]
},
{
"type": "Announce",
"actor": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1094073377875828742",
"object": {
"type": "Note",
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1331280322720960532/entities/urn:activity:1531034129557098504",
"attributedTo": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1331280322720960532",
"content": "VIDEO ARCHIVES: NIGHTLY NEWS FOR MONDAY, DECEMBER 17, 2012<br />*Full Show On Telegram (Link In Bio)<br /><br />On this broadcast of The InfoWars Nightly News, David Knight speaks with Tom McMillan (39:30) Michigan Rep on the Feinstein Amendment, Nullification NDAA in Michigan which states that Michigan will not help the Fed enforce NDAA and how it compares to Texas bill which says indefinite detention provisions in NDAA is null and void in Texas.<br /><br />News Covered:<br /><br />Clackamas mall shooter faced man with concealed weapon.<br /><br />Two wounded in theater shooting.<br /><br />Flashback Story: Democratic Operatives Urged Obama To Seize On Attacks.<br /><br />Gandhi advocated the right to bear arms; use of 'violence' to defend innocents against bullying, oppression.<br /><br />Americans Turn In Guns After School Massacre.<br /><br />Do guns kill people? Pistol, shotgun, assault rifle put to the test.<br /><br />Gun-control petition to White House breaks record.<br /><br />Pediatricians call to keep thimerosal in vaccines.<br /><br /><a href=\"http://www.prisonplanet.com/democratic-operatives-urged-obama-to-seize-on-attacks.html/print/\" target=\"_blank\">http://www.prisonplanet.com/democratic-operatives-urged-obama-to-seize-on-attacks.html/print/</a><br /><br /><a href=\"http://www.naturalnews.com/038372_Gandhi_nonviolence_right_to_bear_arms.html\" target=\"_blank\">http://www.naturalnews.com/038372_Gandhi_nonviolence_right_to_bear_arms.html</a><br /><br /><a href=\"http://www.infowars.com/americans-turn-in-guns-after-school-massacre/\" target=\"_blank\">http://www.infowars.com/americans-turn-in-guns-after-school-massacre/</a><br /><br />For viral content, in-depth insights and breaking news be sure to follow David Knight on Twitter <a class=\"u-url mention\" href=\"https://www.minds.com/Libertytarian\" target=\"_blank\">@Libertytarian</a>. Also on Gab and Substack <a class=\"u-url mention\" href=\"https://www.minds.com/DavidKnightShow\" target=\"_blank\">@DavidKnightShow</a> & Minds <a class=\"u-url mention\" href=\"https://www.minds.com/thedavidknightshow\" target=\"_blank\">@thedavidknightshow</a>.<br /><br /><a href=\"http://tv.infowars.com/index/display/page/165/id/4416\" target=\"_blank\">http://tv.infowars.com/index/display/page/165/id/4416</a><br /><br /><a href=\"https://www.minds.com/search?f=top&t=all&q=Michigan\" title=\"#Michigan\" class=\"u-url hashtag\" target=\"_blank\">#Michigan</a> <a href=\"https://www.minds.com/search?f=top&t=all&q=Texas\" title=\"#Texas\" class=\"u-url hashtag\" target=\"_blank\">#Texas</a> <a href=\"https://www.minds.com/search?f=top&t=all&q=NDAA\" title=\"#NDAA\" class=\"u-url hashtag\" target=\"_blank\">#NDAA</a> <a href=\"https://www.minds.com/search?f=top&t=all&q=Null\" title=\"#Null\" class=\"u-url hashtag\" target=\"_blank\">#Null</a> <a href=\"https://www.minds.com/search?f=top&t=all&q=Void\" title=\"#Void\" class=\"u-url hashtag\" target=\"_blank\">#Void</a> <a href=\"https://www.minds.com/newsfeed/1531034129557098504\" target=\"_blank\">https://www.minds.com/newsfeed/1531034129557098504</a>",
"to": [
"https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public"
],
"cc": [
"https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1331280322720960532/followers"
],
"tag": [
{
"type": "Mention",
"href": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1330731508062752780",
"name": "@DavidKnightShow"
},
{
"type": "Mention",
"href": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1330926940382564369",
"name": "@thedavidknightshow"
}
],
"url": "https://www.minds.com/newsfeed/1531034129557098504",
"published": "2023-07-26T20:23:01+00:00",
"source": {
"content": "VIDEO ARCHIVES: NIGHTLY NEWS FOR MONDAY, DECEMBER 17, 2012\n*Full Show On Telegram (Link In Bio)\n\nOn this broadcast of The InfoWars Nightly News, David Knight speaks with Tom McMillan (39:30) Michigan Rep on the Feinstein Amendment, Nullification NDAA in Michigan which states that Michigan will not help the Fed enforce NDAA and how it compares to Texas bill which says indefinite detention provisions in NDAA is null and void in Texas.\n\nNews Covered:\n\nClackamas mall shooter faced man with concealed weapon.\n\nTwo wounded in theater shooting.\n\nFlashback Story: Democratic Operatives Urged Obama To Seize On Attacks.\n\nGandhi advocated the right to bear arms; use of 'violence' to defend innocents against bullying, oppression.\n\nAmericans Turn In Guns After School Massacre.\n\nDo guns kill people? Pistol, shotgun, assault rifle put to the test.\n\nGun-control petition to White House breaks record.\n\nPediatricians call to keep thimerosal in vaccines.\n\nhttp://www.prisonplanet.com/democratic-operatives-urged-obama-to-seize-on-attacks.html/print/\n\nhttp://www.naturalnews.com/038372_Gandhi_nonviolence_right_to_bear_arms.html\n\nhttp://www.infowars.com/americans-turn-in-guns-after-school-massacre/\n\nFor viral content, in-depth insights and breaking news be sure to follow David Knight on Twitter @Libertytarian. Also on Gab and Substack @DavidKnightShow & Minds @thedavidknightshow.\n\nhttp://tv.infowars.com/index/display/page/165/id/4416\n\n#Michigan #Texas #NDAA #Null #Void https://www.minds.com/newsfeed/1531034129557098504",
"mediaType": "text/plain"
}
},
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1094073377875828742/entities/urn:activity:1537232064661688340/activity",
"to": [
"https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public"
],
"cc": [
"https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1331280322720960532",
"https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1094073377875828742/followers"
]
},
{
"type": "Announce",
"actor": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1094073377875828742",
"object": {
"type": "Note",
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/473999752480960530/entities/urn:activity:1531313744049606665",
"attributedTo": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/473999752480960530",
"content": "<a href=\"https://www.minds.com/newsfeed/1531313744049606665\" target=\"_blank\">https://www.minds.com/newsfeed/1531313744049606665</a>",
"to": [
"https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public"
],
"cc": [
"https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/473999752480960530/followers"
],
"tag": [],
"url": "https://www.minds.com/newsfeed/1531313744049606665",
"published": "2023-07-27T14:54:06+00:00",
"attachment": [
{
"type": "Document",
"url": "https://cdn.minds.com/fs/v1/thumbnail/1531313724265074704/xlarge/",
"mediaType": "image/jpeg",
"height": 1200,
"width": 1920
}
],
"source": {
"content": "https://www.minds.com/newsfeed/1531313744049606665",
"mediaType": "text/plain"
}
},
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1094073377875828742/entities/urn:activity:1537231888089878536/activity",
"to": [
"https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public"
],
"cc": [
"https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/473999752480960530",
"https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1094073377875828742/followers"
]
},
{
"type": "Announce",
"actor": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1094073377875828742",
"object": {
"type": "Note",
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/837410026611023881/entities/urn:activity:1535447069135736841",
"attributedTo": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/837410026611023881",
"content": "THIS IS BIG!!!<br /><br /><br /><br />International Common Law Commercial Claim Notice: A Proper Reading:<br />By Anna Von Reitz<br /><br />Continue at <a href=\"http://www.paulstramer.net/2023/08/international-common-law-commerical.html\" target=\"_blank\">http://www.paulstramer.net/2023/08/international-common-law-commerical.html</a><br /><br /><br />It used to be the custom that apprentice lawyers “read the law” as preparation for their chosen profession under the guidance of an established practitioner. Law was a trade established under the Guild system in Europe, not a profession, and every lawyer served as an apprentice. I am a rare and belated product of that system of tutelage, which, though uncommon in the modern day, has never failed to have its charms and advantages.<br /><br />I was greatly favored by fortune to study under two great men who were very accomplished Masters, who between them, had practiced American Common Law, British Equity Law, Maritime Law, Admiralty Law, Martial Law, Ecclesiastical and Canon Law, during their long and illustrious careers. So, while I am not and will never be a member of the Bar Association, I am well-educated and competent to render that rare thing: a proper reading of the law and history written as law.<br /><br />It will come as a surprise to many that some forms of history are written as law and use legals terms that an average person will be unaware of, so that the truth is hidden in plain sight--- easily accessible to lawyers, but conveniently hidden from the General Public. With the advantage of having a competent and willing interpreter at your side, let’s examine some key events in American History that were preserved by lawyers and written down in historical legalese:<br /><br />Quote and Fact: “Seven southern nation States of America walked out of the Second Session of the Thirty-sixth Congress on March 27, 1861.”<br /><br />Because it says, “States of America” and not “States”, we know that the entities represented were States-of-States, also known as Confederate States, that were members of the original Confederation formed by The Articles of Confederation in 1781, and we already know from other readings that this Confederation was the American Subcontractor awarded the Service Contract known as The Constitution for the united States of America in 1787.<br /><br />Also, because the odd construction “nation States” is used instead of “nation states” or “Nation States” we know that the entities operating these “Confederate States” were sovereign nations. In this case, the Union states were the sovereign nations operating the member organizations of the Confederation. For example, Florida was operating The State of Florida, and The State of Florida was a member of the original Confederation.<br /><br />All this additional information is instantly available to one who is trained to read the law and who can then also read history written as law.<br /><br />The Congress which adjourned Sine Die – meaning without a date to meet again, had to be the Congress of the States of America Confederation and not the Congress of the United States, nor the Congress of the United States of America.<br /><br />Why does this matter? Because…. There were three (3) original Federal Subcontractors, one American, one British, and one Holy Roman Empire organization, and we are now discussing how the lead Subcontractor in possession of the key contract, the original Federal Constitution issued in 1787, committed suicide. They just walked out and left the door wide open.<br /><br />On April 15, 1861, two weeks later, President Lincoln convened (a) Congress under the Executive branch by proclamation (Number 1): “I do hereby, in virtue of the power in me vested by the Constitution, convene both Houses of Congress.”<br /><br />He doesn’t say which Constitution or which Congress he is convening, but we know….<br /><br />It cannot be the adjourned Congress of the States of America because Lincoln was not an officer, much less an Executive Officer of the States of America. He was literally prohibited from serving in any such capacity, because he was a Bar Attorney and The Constitution of the united States of America had been amended in 1819 by the ratification of the Titles of Nobility Amendment, sometimes known as the “missing” or “original” 13th Amendment, so that no Bar Member could hold an office in the American Confederation doing business as the States of America operating under The Constitution for the united States of America.<br /><br />No, the only Congress that Lincoln could convene was the Congress of the United States of America, Incorporated, the British Crown Corporation Subcontractor operating under The Constitution of the United States of America ---- and he would have to do that under Executive Power as the “President” of this foreign British Territorial Municipal Corporation.<br /><br />See the Switch? Let’s make this very explicit and plain:<br /><br />The Congress of the States of America Confederation, which was running the Federal Republic under The Constitution for the united States of America, adjourned, and didn’t come back into Session.<br /><br />This left a vacuum of power and an opportunity to usurp.<br /><br />Lincoln called another, different Congress, the “Congress” of the British Territorial United States of America, Incorporated, into Session.<br /><br />He could convene that “Congress” because he was President of that Corporation.<br /><br />So, Lincoln pulled a deft substitution fraud on the people of this country and replaced the Congress of the American Federal Subcontractor with the Congress of the British Territorial Subcontractor, instead.<br /><br />Our American Federal Government thus came under the control of a British Crown Corporation headed by Abraham Lincoln, a Bar Attorney holding allegiance to the then-Queen Victoria.<br /><br />Lincoln, by pulling this sleight of hand and appearing to convene the “missing” Congress, while in fact convening a different Congress entirely, proved to be one of the greatest con artists in history.<br /><br />Americans are still confused by this little parlor trick and virtually all assume that the American Congress operated in what they call “de jure” capacity prior to this, and then operated in what they call “de facto” capacity ever since --- but no, that’s not what happened.<br /><br />There were two (2) completely different Federal Subcontractors involved before and after these events: the original American Confederation of States operating as the States of America, was literally replaced by the British Crown Subcontractor operating as the United States of America, Incorporated.<br /><br />The mechanism was simple. The Confederation stopped functioning, so the British Territorial corporation moved in and started functioning in a capacity never intended for it.<br /><br />Lincoln repeatedly abused his position of trust.<br /><br />Lincoln wasn’t eligible to serve as President of the Confederation because the Titles of Nobility Amendment (TONA) had been ratified by the States in 1819, prohibiting Bar Attorneys from holding public offices in our American government. As a result, Lincoln had no Public Office in our government, but he was free as a bird to serve as “President” of a privately owned and operated foreign corporation, the United States of America, Incorporated.<br /><br />Lincoln, a Bar Attorney, deceptively occupied the office of President of the United States of America, Incorporated, a British Crown Corporation, and passed that foreign private corporation “presidency” off as the Public Office intended by, and owed to, the people of this country when they voted in the General Election of 1860.<br /><br />Lincoln and his supporters knew this and continued with the deception anyway. They operated under a “cloak of secrecy” then and their successors have continued to operate under a cloak of secrecy ever since. It was in this way that the Federal Republic owing allegiance to the American People was set aside and a substitute organization, a privately owned and operated British Crown Corporation, was stood up in its place.<br /><br />Having already betrayed the Public Trust by misrepresenting the nature of his “presidency”, Lincoln next usurped upon the American Federal Subcontractor, and put his own British Crown Corporation in the driver’s seat under his own Executive Power.<br /><br />Lincoln was occupying no American Public Office when he did this, nor at any other time during his “presidency”.<br /><br />His Administration and everything associated with it was a fraud in the nature of a Half-Truth.<br /><br />The United States of America, Incorporated, was a Federal Subcontractor operating under The Constitution of the United States of America, and Abraham Lincoln was its President. That much was true, and that did afford him an ability to legitimately exercise some limited and enumerated delegated powers.<br /><br />However, that constitutional contract did not afford Lincoln or any other British Crown Corporation \"President\" the sweeping powers he assumed on April 15th, 1861.<br /><br />Finally confronting the abject criminality of “Honest Abe” and his cohorts, we can now better understand the terrible consequences of the Mercenary Conflict, disguised as a Civil War, which followed.<br /><br />Let us notice that:<br /><br />(1) Our American Federal Republic was undermined by infighting among the State-of-State organizations that were members of the original Confederation established in 1781. If they had simply stood together and exposed Lincoln's charade, the so-called Civil War and the usurpation of our American Government by British Commercial Interests, would never have happened;<br /><br />(2) The Confederation in possession of The Constitution for the united States of America was vacated by its own members, never dissolved nor overcome by any act of war. The re-establishment of the Federal Republic only requires each State of the Union to reconstruct its own State-of-State organization and send delegates charged with the responsibility of running the Federal Republic to Washington, DC.<br /><br />(3) Nothing that Lincoln did was credible. It was all in the nature of a deliberate fraud scheme based on half-truths and semantic deceits based on similar names and substitutions of Public Offices for private offices. As this entire history was begun in fraud, it ends as fraud and is null and void as if it never was.<br /><br />(4) The cloak of secrecy about all of this was provided by members of the Bar Associations preying upon the ignorance of the General Public and the inability of the General Public to read law and history written in the form of law. For one population, the lawyers among us, the entire circumstance is plain as day and always has been. They failed their Public Duty as Americans to reveal this dire usurpation, for the simple reason that virtually all of them are Bar Association members, and as Bar Association members, they owe allegiance to the British Crown. It was this conflict of interest which motivated the Americans to enact the Titles of Nobility Amendment and to attach it to The Constitution for the united States of America in the first place.<br /><br />I am not a Bar Member. I have dishonored no contract, broken no Oath, and disavowed no allegiance by telling you what all this means in plain English.<br /><br />(5) As Lincoln occupied no Public Office in the American Government, his actions including his Administration of the entire so-called Civil War can have no valid impact upon us, and results in no indebtedness for us, unless we count actions such as the final surrender of the CSS Shenandoah, taking place on the High Seas and Navigable Inland Waterways, that would have naturally fallen under the delegated powers that were assigned by The Constitution of the United States of America.<br /><br />(6) All the debts and all the usurpations that we and our Government have suffered at the hands of these British Con Artists are due and owing redress from the British Monarch and the Lord Mayor of the Inner City of London. Lincoln and his Successors have been under contract to render Americans good faith service the entire time, and by both word and deed, they have defaulted and dishonored their obligations and defrauded us. They have organized an unauthorized foreign military district court system on our land and soil and used this to practice personage against their faithful employers, turning what should be an institution of justice into a den of thieves intent on illegal confiscation of American property for 158 years.<br /><br />(7) The long dormant American Government has awakened and our States of the Union are now in General Assembly throughout the country. The British Government and Crown are making a feeble attempt to pull yet another substitution fraud, by offering to send their Operatives into our Assemblies to disrupt our progress and to occupy our Federal Republic \"for\" us --- offers which we have firmly refused.<br /><br />(8) Owing to the many decades that these British Commercial Interests have been enabled to act under color of law while carrying out their despicable acts of terror and despotism \"in our names\", they have accrued an insurmountable debt to the American People, and so these Corporations and their franchises stand foreclosed. We require the assistance of all right-thinking people, all peacekeepers, all valid law enforcement agencies, and all allied and friendly sovereign governments to recoup control of our Good Names, our physical assets, and credit.<br /><br />(9) The banks of the world also bear responsibility for the inculcation and preservation of the Cloak of Secrecy protecting this Great Fraud against the American People and many other sovereign nations and peoples. The Bank of England is especially implicated, together with the various iterations of Federal Reserve Banks, the Swiss Octagon Group, the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund, together with their associated Insurers and Underwriters. This immense fraud against the lawful governments and living people could never have happened without the willing assistance of the banks as accomplices to the Crimes of State involved.<br /><br />(10) On April 25th 1863 Abraham Lincoln bankrupted his British Crown Corporation operating as the United States of America, Incorporated.<br /><br />Five years later, 1868, another British Crown Corporation organized in Scotland and doing-business-as The United States of America (Incorporated) booted up, and the banks allowed this foreign impersonator to access the credit owed to our unincorporated Federation of States, The United States of America.<br /><br />They instituted the Greenbacks Scheme, by which they created a new investment instrument, a Treasury Bond payable in either 10 year or 40 year version, but in order for investors to buy this particular investment, they had to first exchange their gold for Lincoln's Greenbacks and then pay for the Treasury Bonds in Greenbacks. The investors understood that they would be repaid after 10 or 40 years with gold plus interest, however, when the Treasury Bonds came due, General William \"Tecumseh\" Sherman refused to pay in gold, saying, famously, --- \"What did you use to buy these bonds? Greenbacks. So why would you demand repayment in gold?<br /><br />Thus millions of mostly American investors were defrauded out of their gold and suckered into investing in Greenbacks instead of the gold-backed investment bonds they imagined were on offer. The gold-backed Treasury Bonds (unknowingly backed by the defrauded private investors themselves) were nonetheless due. By 1906 this goose was nicely cooked and \"The United States of America\" Incorporated in Scotland was forced into bankruptcy -- with the result that the American people were again forced to pay the bill for these criminals.<br /><br />(11) On Christmas Eve, 1913, as that bankruptcy was settling, the Successors to that Corporation operating as, again, the United States of America, Inc., engineered the installation of a fiat money scheme based on the issuance of our credit against us and against our best interests; they also misappropriated the seigniorage owed to ourselves as the actual Underwriters. This action resulted in labor being used as the asset underlying the currency and a system of debt slavery being imposed on this country by and through Principals owing us good faith service.<br /><br />(12) On March 6th 1933, Franklin Delano Roosevelt announced to the Conference of British Territorial Governors, that \"the United States of America (Incorporated) is bankrupt!\" --- and the cost of that bankruptcy would again be passed off onto the American populace as the presumed Underwriters and Guarantors of all the spending that these British Crown usurpers were doing \"for\" us and in our names, as preparation for their latest war-for-profit scheme-- the Second World War.<br /><br />In concert with this, the same Crown Corporation interests were obliged to issue and publish a fixed exchange rate by which they proposed to exchange one of their I.O.U.s predicated on labor performance in the future for one American Silver Dollar. In this way they received the bulk of our silver currency in inequitable exchange for their promised future performances and acquired an exchangeable debt amounting to trillions of ounces of fine silver, payable on demand. They simply never thought that someone with standing to make the demand would make it, but here I am.<br /><br />cont..........<br /><br />Issued by: Anna Maria Riezinger, Fiduciary<br /><br />The United States of America<br /><br />In care of: Box 520994<br /><br />Big Lake, Alaska 99652<br /><br />August 7th 2023",
"to": [
"https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public"
],
"cc": [
"https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/837410026611023881/followers"
],
"tag": [],
"url": "https://www.minds.com/newsfeed/1535447069135736841",
"published": "2023-08-08T00:38:27+00:00",
"attachment": [
{
"type": "Document",
"url": "https://cdn.minds.com/fs/v1/thumbnail/1535446334419505160/xlarge/",
"mediaType": "image/jpeg",
"height": 200,
"width": 234
}
],
"source": {
"content": "THIS IS BIG!!!\n\n\n\nInternational Common Law Commercial Claim Notice: A Proper Reading:\nBy Anna Von Reitz\n\nContinue at http://www.paulstramer.net/2023/08/international-common-law-commerical.html\n\n\nIt used to be the custom that apprentice lawyers “read the law” as preparation for their chosen profession under the guidance of an established practitioner. Law was a trade established under the Guild system in Europe, not a profession, and every lawyer served as an apprentice. I am a rare and belated product of that system of tutelage, which, though uncommon in the modern day, has never failed to have its charms and advantages.\n\nI was greatly favored by fortune to study under two great men who were very accomplished Masters, who between them, had practiced American Common Law, British Equity Law, Maritime Law, Admiralty Law, Martial Law, Ecclesiastical and Canon Law, during their long and illustrious careers. So, while I am not and will never be a member of the Bar Association, I am well-educated and competent to render that rare thing: a proper reading of the law and history written as law.\n\nIt will come as a surprise to many that some forms of history are written as law and use legals terms that an average person will be unaware of, so that the truth is hidden in plain sight--- easily accessible to lawyers, but conveniently hidden from the General Public. With the advantage of having a competent and willing interpreter at your side, let’s examine some key events in American History that were preserved by lawyers and written down in historical legalese:\n\nQuote and Fact: “Seven southern nation States of America walked out of the Second Session of the Thirty-sixth Congress on March 27, 1861.”\n\nBecause it says, “States of America” and not “States”, we know that the entities represented were States-of-States, also known as Confederate States, that were members of the original Confederation formed by The Articles of Confederation in 1781, and we already know from other readings that this Confederation was the American Subcontractor awarded the Service Contract known as The Constitution for the united States of America in 1787.\n\nAlso, because the odd construction “nation States” is used instead of “nation states” or “Nation States” we know that the entities operating these “Confederate States” were sovereign nations. In this case, the Union states were the sovereign nations operating the member organizations of the Confederation. For example, Florida was operating The State of Florida, and The State of Florida was a member of the original Confederation.\n\nAll this additional information is instantly available to one who is trained to read the law and who can then also read history written as law.\n\nThe Congress which adjourned Sine Die – meaning without a date to meet again, had to be the Congress of the States of America Confederation and not the Congress of the United States, nor the Congress of the United States of America.\n\nWhy does this matter? Because…. There were three (3) original Federal Subcontractors, one American, one British, and one Holy Roman Empire organization, and we are now discussing how the lead Subcontractor in possession of the key contract, the original Federal Constitution issued in 1787, committed suicide. They just walked out and left the door wide open.\n\nOn April 15, 1861, two weeks later, President Lincoln convened (a) Congress under the Executive branch by proclamation (Number 1): “I do hereby, in virtue of the power in me vested by the Constitution, convene both Houses of Congress.”\n\nHe doesn’t say which Constitution or which Congress he is convening, but we know….\n\nIt cannot be the adjourned Congress of the States of America because Lincoln was not an officer, much less an Executive Officer of the States of America. He was literally prohibited from serving in any such capacity, because he was a Bar Attorney and The Constitution of the united States of America had been amended in 1819 by the ratification of the Titles of Nobility Amendment, sometimes known as the “missing” or “original” 13th Amendment, so that no Bar Member could hold an office in the American Confederation doing business as the States of America operating under The Constitution for the united States of America.\n\nNo, the only Congress that Lincoln could convene was the Congress of the United States of America, Incorporated, the British Crown Corporation Subcontractor operating under The Constitution of the United States of America ---- and he would have to do that under Executive Power as the “President” of this foreign British Territorial Municipal Corporation.\n\nSee the Switch? Let’s make this very explicit and plain:\n\nThe Congress of the States of America Confederation, which was running the Federal Republic under The Constitution for the united States of America, adjourned, and didn’t come back into Session.\n\nThis left a vacuum of power and an opportunity to usurp.\n\nLincoln called another, different Congress, the “Congress” of the British Territorial United States of America, Incorporated, into Session.\n\nHe could convene that “Congress” because he was President of that Corporation.\n\nSo, Lincoln pulled a deft substitution fraud on the people of this country and replaced the Congress of the American Federal Subcontractor with the Congress of the British Territorial Subcontractor, instead.\n\nOur American Federal Government thus came under the control of a British Crown Corporation headed by Abraham Lincoln, a Bar Attorney holding allegiance to the then-Queen Victoria.\n\nLincoln, by pulling this sleight of hand and appearing to convene the “missing” Congress, while in fact convening a different Congress entirely, proved to be one of the greatest con artists in history.\n\nAmericans are still confused by this little parlor trick and virtually all assume that the American Congress operated in what they call “de jure” capacity prior to this, and then operated in what they call “de facto” capacity ever since --- but no, that’s not what happened.\n\nThere were two (2) completely different Federal Subcontractors involved before and after these events: the original American Confederation of States operating as the States of America, was literally replaced by the British Crown Subcontractor operating as the United States of America, Incorporated.\n\nThe mechanism was simple. The Confederation stopped functioning, so the British Territorial corporation moved in and started functioning in a capacity never intended for it.\n\nLincoln repeatedly abused his position of trust.\n\nLincoln wasn’t eligible to serve as President of the Confederation because the Titles of Nobility Amendment (TONA) had been ratified by the States in 1819, prohibiting Bar Attorneys from holding public offices in our American government. As a result, Lincoln had no Public Office in our government, but he was free as a bird to serve as “President” of a privately owned and operated foreign corporation, the United States of America, Incorporated.\n\nLincoln, a Bar Attorney, deceptively occupied the office of President of the United States of America, Incorporated, a British Crown Corporation, and passed that foreign private corporation “presidency” off as the Public Office intended by, and owed to, the people of this country when they voted in the General Election of 1860.\n\nLincoln and his supporters knew this and continued with the deception anyway. They operated under a “cloak of secrecy” then and their successors have continued to operate under a cloak of secrecy ever since. It was in this way that the Federal Republic owing allegiance to the American People was set aside and a substitute organization, a privately owned and operated British Crown Corporation, was stood up in its place.\n\nHaving already betrayed the Public Trust by misrepresenting the nature of his “presidency”, Lincoln next usurped upon the American Federal Subcontractor, and put his own British Crown Corporation in the driver’s seat under his own Executive Power.\n\nLincoln was occupying no American Public Office when he did this, nor at any other time during his “presidency”.\n\nHis Administration and everything associated with it was a fraud in the nature of a Half-Truth.\n\nThe United States of America, Incorporated, was a Federal Subcontractor operating under The Constitution of the United States of America, and Abraham Lincoln was its President. That much was true, and that did afford him an ability to legitimately exercise some limited and enumerated delegated powers.\n\nHowever, that constitutional contract did not afford Lincoln or any other British Crown Corporation \"President\" the sweeping powers he assumed on April 15th, 1861.\n\nFinally confronting the abject criminality of “Honest Abe” and his cohorts, we can now better understand the terrible consequences of the Mercenary Conflict, disguised as a Civil War, which followed.\n\nLet us notice that:\n\n(1) Our American Federal Republic was undermined by infighting among the State-of-State organizations that were members of the original Confederation established in 1781. If they had simply stood together and exposed Lincoln's charade, the so-called Civil War and the usurpation of our American Government by British Commercial Interests, would never have happened;\n\n(2) The Confederation in possession of The Constitution for the united States of America was vacated by its own members, never dissolved nor overcome by any act of war. The re-establishment of the Federal Republic only requires each State of the Union to reconstruct its own State-of-State organization and send delegates charged with the responsibility of running the Federal Republic to Washington, DC.\n\n(3) Nothing that Lincoln did was credible. It was all in the nature of a deliberate fraud scheme based on half-truths and semantic deceits based on similar names and substitutions of Public Offices for private offices. As this entire history was begun in fraud, it ends as fraud and is null and void as if it never was.\n\n(4) The cloak of secrecy about all of this was provided by members of the Bar Associations preying upon the ignorance of the General Public and the inability of the General Public to read law and history written in the form of law. For one population, the lawyers among us, the entire circumstance is plain as day and always has been. They failed their Public Duty as Americans to reveal this dire usurpation, for the simple reason that virtually all of them are Bar Association members, and as Bar Association members, they owe allegiance to the British Crown. It was this conflict of interest which motivated the Americans to enact the Titles of Nobility Amendment and to attach it to The Constitution for the united States of America in the first place.\n\nI am not a Bar Member. I have dishonored no contract, broken no Oath, and disavowed no allegiance by telling you what all this means in plain English.\n\n(5) As Lincoln occupied no Public Office in the American Government, his actions including his Administration of the entire so-called Civil War can have no valid impact upon us, and results in no indebtedness for us, unless we count actions such as the final surrender of the CSS Shenandoah, taking place on the High Seas and Navigable Inland Waterways, that would have naturally fallen under the delegated powers that were assigned by The Constitution of the United States of America.\n\n(6) All the debts and all the usurpations that we and our Government have suffered at the hands of these British Con Artists are due and owing redress from the British Monarch and the Lord Mayor of the Inner City of London. Lincoln and his Successors have been under contract to render Americans good faith service the entire time, and by both word and deed, they have defaulted and dishonored their obligations and defrauded us. They have organized an unauthorized foreign military district court system on our land and soil and used this to practice personage against their faithful employers, turning what should be an institution of justice into a den of thieves intent on illegal confiscation of American property for 158 years.\n\n(7) The long dormant American Government has awakened and our States of the Union are now in General Assembly throughout the country. The British Government and Crown are making a feeble attempt to pull yet another substitution fraud, by offering to send their Operatives into our Assemblies to disrupt our progress and to occupy our Federal Republic \"for\" us --- offers which we have firmly refused.\n\n(8) Owing to the many decades that these British Commercial Interests have been enabled to act under color of law while carrying out their despicable acts of terror and despotism \"in our names\", they have accrued an insurmountable debt to the American People, and so these Corporations and their franchises stand foreclosed. We require the assistance of all right-thinking people, all peacekeepers, all valid law enforcement agencies, and all allied and friendly sovereign governments to recoup control of our Good Names, our physical assets, and credit.\n\n(9) The banks of the world also bear responsibility for the inculcation and preservation of the Cloak of Secrecy protecting this Great Fraud against the American People and many other sovereign nations and peoples. The Bank of England is especially implicated, together with the various iterations of Federal Reserve Banks, the Swiss Octagon Group, the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund, together with their associated Insurers and Underwriters. This immense fraud against the lawful governments and living people could never have happened without the willing assistance of the banks as accomplices to the Crimes of State involved.\n\n(10) On April 25th 1863 Abraham Lincoln bankrupted his British Crown Corporation operating as the United States of America, Incorporated.\n\nFive years later, 1868, another British Crown Corporation organized in Scotland and doing-business-as The United States of America (Incorporated) booted up, and the banks allowed this foreign impersonator to access the credit owed to our unincorporated Federation of States, The United States of America.\n\nThey instituted the Greenbacks Scheme, by which they created a new investment instrument, a Treasury Bond payable in either 10 year or 40 year version, but in order for investors to buy this particular investment, they had to first exchange their gold for Lincoln's Greenbacks and then pay for the Treasury Bonds in Greenbacks. The investors understood that they would be repaid after 10 or 40 years with gold plus interest, however, when the Treasury Bonds came due, General William \"Tecumseh\" Sherman refused to pay in gold, saying, famously, --- \"What did you use to buy these bonds? Greenbacks. So why would you demand repayment in gold?\n\nThus millions of mostly American investors were defrauded out of their gold and suckered into investing in Greenbacks instead of the gold-backed investment bonds they imagined were on offer. The gold-backed Treasury Bonds (unknowingly backed by the defrauded private investors themselves) were nonetheless due. By 1906 this goose was nicely cooked and \"The United States of America\" Incorporated in Scotland was forced into bankruptcy -- with the result that the American people were again forced to pay the bill for these criminals.\n\n(11) On Christmas Eve, 1913, as that bankruptcy was settling, the Successors to that Corporation operating as, again, the United States of America, Inc., engineered the installation of a fiat money scheme based on the issuance of our credit against us and against our best interests; they also misappropriated the seigniorage owed to ourselves as the actual Underwriters. This action resulted in labor being used as the asset underlying the currency and a system of debt slavery being imposed on this country by and through Principals owing us good faith service.\n\n(12) On March 6th 1933, Franklin Delano Roosevelt announced to the Conference of British Territorial Governors, that \"the United States of America (Incorporated) is bankrupt!\" --- and the cost of that bankruptcy would again be passed off onto the American populace as the presumed Underwriters and Guarantors of all the spending that these British Crown usurpers were doing \"for\" us and in our names, as preparation for their latest war-for-profit scheme-- the Second World War.\n\nIn concert with this, the same Crown Corporation interests were obliged to issue and publish a fixed exchange rate by which they proposed to exchange one of their I.O.U.s predicated on labor performance in the future for one American Silver Dollar. In this way they received the bulk of our silver currency in inequitable exchange for their promised future performances and acquired an exchangeable debt amounting to trillions of ounces of fine silver, payable on demand. They simply never thought that someone with standing to make the demand would make it, but here I am.\n\ncont..........\n\nIssued by: Anna Maria Riezinger, Fiduciary\n\nThe United States of America\n\nIn care of: Box 520994\n\nBig Lake, Alaska 99652\n\nAugust 7th 2023",
"mediaType": "text/plain"
}
},
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1094073377875828742/entities/urn:activity:1537228304015167501/activity",
"to": [
"https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public"
],
"cc": [
"https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/837410026611023881",
"https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1094073377875828742/followers"
]
},
{
"type": "Announce",
"actor": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1094073377875828742",
"object": {
"type": "Note",
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/816802141879410694/entities/urn:activity:1532106193131016211",
"attributedTo": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/816802141879410694",
"content": "Disney Loses Attempt To Dismiss Florida Lawsuit Challenging Reedy Creek Covenants Giving Disney Perpetual Control<br /><br />Florida can continue to seek a declaration that the restrictive covenants put in place by then Disney-controlled Board of the Reedy Creek Improvement District allowing Disney control in perpetuity were void ab initio, potentially mooting much or all of Disney’s federal lawsuit.<br /><br />William A. Jacobson Saturday, July 29, 2023 at 12:00pm <br /><br />We’ve been following the federal court lawsuit brought by Disney challenging actions of the DeSantis administration and Florida legislature over restrictive covenants put in place by the then Disney-controlled Board of the Reedy Creek Improvement District seeking to tie the state’s hands and maintain Disney control in perpetuity.<br /><br />The state responded by dissolving the Reedy Creek district and installing its own Board under the Central Florida Tourism<br />Oversight District (CFTOD). This chart explains the confusing procedural history:<br /><br />Disney claimed the state’s actions violated Disney’s First Amendment and other rights, and were retaliation for Disney’s public positions opposing state legislation regarding LGBTQ instruction in elementary schools.<br /><br />The last we checked in on that federal lawsuit was on June 4, 2023, Judge In Disney v. DeSantis Case Disqualifies Himself.<br /><br />Since then, the state defendants and CFTOD defendants filed motions to dismiss, to which Disney responded yesterday. Among other things, the defendants argue that the federal court should await determination in a lawsuit brought in state court seeking to declare the restrictive covenant agreements void.<br /><br /> In the waning days of its corporate kingdom, Disney rushed through a series of collusive agreements between itself and its puppet RCID board. The agreements purported to bequeath to Disney much of the power that the State itself had given RCID. The newly appointed CFTOD Board announced that it would not comply with Disney’s contracts because they were void under Florida law For good measure, the State also enacted a law barring CFTOD from complying with the agreements in any event.<br /><br /> Its last-ditch power grab having been foiled under state law, Disney now turns to federal constitutional law to sue the Governor, the Secretary of the Florida Department of Economic Opportunity, the CFTOD Board, and CFTOD’s Administrator. Its claims are meritless for many reasons, not least of which is that a special district cannot bind the State to transfer a portion of its sovereign authority to a private entity.<br /><br />We haven’t previously covered that state lawsuit brought by CFTOD seeking to declare the Reedy Creek Districts’ restrictive covenants void ab initio, meaning a declaration that they were void at the time made, rendering irrelevant what happened later:<br /><br /> The DeSantis board’s lawsuit was filed Monday afternoon in Orange County and claims the agreements with Disney “reek of a backroom deal.” The previous board members failed to give proper notice about the agreements, lacked the authority to make them, unlawfully delegated governmental authority to a private entity and the agreements are unenforceable under Florida law, according to the suit.<br /><br /> “We will seek justice in our own backyard,” Martin Garcia, chair of the Central Florida Tourism Oversight District, said at Monday morning’s special meeting approving the lawsuit.<br /><br />The Complaint was filed, and Disney moved to dismiss or stay, which the District opposed.<br /><br />Late yesterday the state court judge denied the motion to dismiss or to stay:<br /><br /> A state judge on Friday denied Disney’s request to throw out a lawsuit seeking to nullify a loophole the entertainment giant used to wrestle back authority over its sprawling central Florida theme park….<br /><br /> The Central Florida Tourism Oversight District state lawsuit against Disney argues that the company’s February agreement giving it back authority “reek[s] of a back room deal,” violated state law and is null and void.<br /><br /> Ninth Circuit Court Judge Margaret Schreiber’s ruling represents a win for the Central Florida Tourism Oversight District, the board backed by Gov. Ron DeSantis that sued Disney in May.<br /><br /> The state lawsuit, however, is separate from the federal suit brought by Disney in April asserting that DeSantis and his hand-picked board violated the company’s First Amendment rights and retaliated against the company for speaking out against Florida’s Parental Rights in Education law, better known as “Don’t Say Gay,” which bans teachers of young students from leading instructions on gender identity and sexual orientation.<br /><br /> “Today’s decision has no bearing on our lawsuit in federal court to vindicate Disney’s constitutional rights, and we are fully confident Disney will prevail in both the federal and state cases,” Disney said in a statement Friday after the ruling.<br /><br />The Court Order recited the history of the Disney deal and the nature of Disney’s federal court lawsuit, which was important to the decision because the Disney lawsuit:<br /><br /> Days before the Florida Legislature passed HB 9B, reforming RCID and its governance structure (and changing its name to the District’s), RCID and Disney entered into two agreements that are the crux of this case: (1) the 30-year “Walt Disney World Chapter 163 Development Agreement” (the “Development Agreement”); and (2) the related “Declaration of Restrictive Covenants” (the “Restrictive Covenants”) (collectively, the “Agreements”). The District alleges that Disney controlled RCID; that Disney itself drafted the Agreements and caused them to be adopted; and that the Agreements would assure Disney’s control of future land use and development within the District, including the District’s own lands, consistent with Disney’s corporate plans for future expansion.<br /><br /> The Restrictive Covenants contain a forum selection clause that expressly provides that any action seeking “any declaration with respect to any rights, remedies, or responsibilities” shall be submitted “exclusively” to the Circuit Court for Orange County, Florida or, failing that, “any other Court sitting in Orange County, Florida.” See Restrictive Covenants at p. 8, § 8.10.<br /><br /> At its public meetings on April 19 and April 26, 2023, the District considered the Agreements and the circumstances surrounding their adoption and concluded that they were void from inception, or void ab initio, for a number of legal reasons outlined in legislative findings that the Board adopted on April 26, 2023….<br /><br /> In its federal suit, Disney takes the position that the Agreements were valid at inception — demonstrating a bona fide dispute between the parties as to that legal issue….<br /><br /> Disney does not, however, (i) seek a declaration that the Agreements were valid at their inception or (ii) allege that the Agreements are void ab initio…. Disney seeks that declaration based solely upon allegations that the challenged laws violate provisions of the federal Constitution in various ways. Disney does not allege any state law claims in the federal lawsuit.<br /><br />The Court went on to find that because the issue in the state case differed from the issue in the federal case, there was no need to decide which case took priority as first filed.<br /><br /> In the instant state court action, the District seeks a binding declaration that the Agreements were void ab initio when adopted on February 8, 2023, irrespective of the passage of SB 1604. The District seeks a ruling on the validity of the Agreements, regardless of the ability of Disney to currently enforce the Agreements.<br /><br />The Court denied that the dispute was “moot” or that a stay was required in light of the different claims in the state and federal cases:<br /><br /> The federal court thus lacks “concurrent jurisdiction” over the District’s state court claims, so it would be an abuse of discretion for this Court to grant a stay….<br /><br /> This court need not address the principle of priority issue where it has determined the federal court lacks concurrent jurisdiction over the District’s state law claims….<br /><br /> In federal court, Disney’s five-count complaint contends that various public officials violated several provisions of the United States Constitution. Four of Disney’s counts depend upon the Agreements being valid, but Disney has pleaded no cause of action for the federal court to declare them so. Rather, Disney’s complaint assumes and asks the federal court<br /> to accept that the Agreements are valid. In contrast, in this state court action, the District claims that the Agreements are invalid from their inception as a matter of Florida law….<br /><br />In an ironic twist, the Court noted that the underlying restrictive covenants had a forum selection clause requiring any litigation in Orange County, Florida. Since Disney sought to enforce those covenants, it couldn’t deprive the District home-venue:<br /><br /> …. delaying the resolution of this case pending the federal litigation would deny to the District its home-venue privilege. See Carlile v. Game & Fresh Water Fish Comm’n, 354 So. 2d 362, 363-64 (Fla. 1977). Ironically, such a ruling would allow Disney to escape the plain terms of the forum selection clause contained in one of the Agreements that Disney contends is valid under Florida law.<br /><br />This was only denial of a motion to dismiss, not a ruling on the merits. But even allowing the lawsuit to proceed is an initial win for Florida. If the state wins the state court lawsuit on the merits, it would mean that much or all of Disney’s federal lawsuit goes away.<br /><br /><br />--Disney Loses Attempt To Dismiss Florida Lawsuit Challenging Reedy Creek Covenants Giving Disney Perpetual Control <br />--<a href=\"https://legalinsurrection.com/2023/07/disney-loses-attempt-to-dismiss-florida-lawsuit-challenging-reedy-creek-covenants-giving-disney-perpetual-control/\" target=\"_blank\">https://legalinsurrection.com/2023/07/disney-loses-attempt-to-dismiss-florida-lawsuit-challenging-reedy-creek-covenants-giving-disney-perpetual-control/</a> <br />-RETRIEVED-Sat Jul 29 2023 21:17:42 GMT+0200 (Central European Summer Time)",
"to": [
"https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public"
],
"cc": [
"https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/816802141879410694/followers"
],
"tag": [],
"url": "https://www.minds.com/newsfeed/1532106193131016211",
"published": "2023-07-29T19:23:00+00:00",
"source": {
"content": "Disney Loses Attempt To Dismiss Florida Lawsuit Challenging Reedy Creek Covenants Giving Disney Perpetual Control\n\nFlorida can continue to seek a declaration that the restrictive covenants put in place by then Disney-controlled Board of the Reedy Creek Improvement District allowing Disney control in perpetuity were void ab initio, potentially mooting much or all of Disney’s federal lawsuit.\n\nWilliam A. Jacobson Saturday, July 29, 2023 at 12:00pm \n\nWe’ve been following the federal court lawsuit brought by Disney challenging actions of the DeSantis administration and Florida legislature over restrictive covenants put in place by the then Disney-controlled Board of the Reedy Creek Improvement District seeking to tie the state’s hands and maintain Disney control in perpetuity.\n\nThe state responded by dissolving the Reedy Creek district and installing its own Board under the Central Florida Tourism\nOversight District (CFTOD). This chart explains the confusing procedural history:\n\nDisney claimed the state’s actions violated Disney’s First Amendment and other rights, and were retaliation for Disney’s public positions opposing state legislation regarding LGBTQ instruction in elementary schools.\n\nThe last we checked in on that federal lawsuit was on June 4, 2023, Judge In Disney v. DeSantis Case Disqualifies Himself.\n\nSince then, the state defendants and CFTOD defendants filed motions to dismiss, to which Disney responded yesterday. Among other things, the defendants argue that the federal court should await determination in a lawsuit brought in state court seeking to declare the restrictive covenant agreements void.\n\n In the waning days of its corporate kingdom, Disney rushed through a series of collusive agreements between itself and its puppet RCID board. The agreements purported to bequeath to Disney much of the power that the State itself had given RCID. The newly appointed CFTOD Board announced that it would not comply with Disney’s contracts because they were void under Florida law For good measure, the State also enacted a law barring CFTOD from complying with the agreements in any event.\n\n Its last-ditch power grab having been foiled under state law, Disney now turns to federal constitutional law to sue the Governor, the Secretary of the Florida Department of Economic Opportunity, the CFTOD Board, and CFTOD’s Administrator. Its claims are meritless for many reasons, not least of which is that a special district cannot bind the State to transfer a portion of its sovereign authority to a private entity.\n\nWe haven’t previously covered that state lawsuit brought by CFTOD seeking to declare the Reedy Creek Districts’ restrictive covenants void ab initio, meaning a declaration that they were void at the time made, rendering irrelevant what happened later:\n\n The DeSantis board’s lawsuit was filed Monday afternoon in Orange County and claims the agreements with Disney “reek of a backroom deal.” The previous board members failed to give proper notice about the agreements, lacked the authority to make them, unlawfully delegated governmental authority to a private entity and the agreements are unenforceable under Florida law, according to the suit.\n\n “We will seek justice in our own backyard,” Martin Garcia, chair of the Central Florida Tourism Oversight District, said at Monday morning’s special meeting approving the lawsuit.\n\nThe Complaint was filed, and Disney moved to dismiss or stay, which the District opposed.\n\nLate yesterday the state court judge denied the motion to dismiss or to stay:\n\n A state judge on Friday denied Disney’s request to throw out a lawsuit seeking to nullify a loophole the entertainment giant used to wrestle back authority over its sprawling central Florida theme park….\n\n The Central Florida Tourism Oversight District state lawsuit against Disney argues that the company’s February agreement giving it back authority “reek[s] of a back room deal,” violated state law and is null and void.\n\n Ninth Circuit Court Judge Margaret Schreiber’s ruling represents a win for the Central Florida Tourism Oversight District, the board backed by Gov. Ron DeSantis that sued Disney in May.\n\n The state lawsuit, however, is separate from the federal suit brought by Disney in April asserting that DeSantis and his hand-picked board violated the company’s First Amendment rights and retaliated against the company for speaking out against Florida’s Parental Rights in Education law, better known as “Don’t Say Gay,” which bans teachers of young students from leading instructions on gender identity and sexual orientation.\n\n “Today’s decision has no bearing on our lawsuit in federal court to vindicate Disney’s constitutional rights, and we are fully confident Disney will prevail in both the federal and state cases,” Disney said in a statement Friday after the ruling.\n\nThe Court Order recited the history of the Disney deal and the nature of Disney’s federal court lawsuit, which was important to the decision because the Disney lawsuit:\n\n Days before the Florida Legislature passed HB 9B, reforming RCID and its governance structure (and changing its name to the District’s), RCID and Disney entered into two agreements that are the crux of this case: (1) the 30-year “Walt Disney World Chapter 163 Development Agreement” (the “Development Agreement”); and (2) the related “Declaration of Restrictive Covenants” (the “Restrictive Covenants”) (collectively, the “Agreements”). The District alleges that Disney controlled RCID; that Disney itself drafted the Agreements and caused them to be adopted; and that the Agreements would assure Disney’s control of future land use and development within the District, including the District’s own lands, consistent with Disney’s corporate plans for future expansion.\n\n The Restrictive Covenants contain a forum selection clause that expressly provides that any action seeking “any declaration with respect to any rights, remedies, or responsibilities” shall be submitted “exclusively” to the Circuit Court for Orange County, Florida or, failing that, “any other Court sitting in Orange County, Florida.” See Restrictive Covenants at p. 8, § 8.10.\n\n At its public meetings on April 19 and April 26, 2023, the District considered the Agreements and the circumstances surrounding their adoption and concluded that they were void from inception, or void ab initio, for a number of legal reasons outlined in legislative findings that the Board adopted on April 26, 2023….\n\n In its federal suit, Disney takes the position that the Agreements were valid at inception — demonstrating a bona fide dispute between the parties as to that legal issue….\n\n Disney does not, however, (i) seek a declaration that the Agreements were valid at their inception or (ii) allege that the Agreements are void ab initio…. Disney seeks that declaration based solely upon allegations that the challenged laws violate provisions of the federal Constitution in various ways. Disney does not allege any state law claims in the federal lawsuit.\n\nThe Court went on to find that because the issue in the state case differed from the issue in the federal case, there was no need to decide which case took priority as first filed.\n\n In the instant state court action, the District seeks a binding declaration that the Agreements were void ab initio when adopted on February 8, 2023, irrespective of the passage of SB 1604. The District seeks a ruling on the validity of the Agreements, regardless of the ability of Disney to currently enforce the Agreements.\n\nThe Court denied that the dispute was “moot” or that a stay was required in light of the different claims in the state and federal cases:\n\n The federal court thus lacks “concurrent jurisdiction” over the District’s state court claims, so it would be an abuse of discretion for this Court to grant a stay….\n\n This court need not address the principle of priority issue where it has determined the federal court lacks concurrent jurisdiction over the District’s state law claims….\n\n In federal court, Disney’s five-count complaint contends that various public officials violated several provisions of the United States Constitution. Four of Disney’s counts depend upon the Agreements being valid, but Disney has pleaded no cause of action for the federal court to declare them so. Rather, Disney’s complaint assumes and asks the federal court\n to accept that the Agreements are valid. In contrast, in this state court action, the District claims that the Agreements are invalid from their inception as a matter of Florida law….\n\nIn an ironic twist, the Court noted that the underlying restrictive covenants had a forum selection clause requiring any litigation in Orange County, Florida. Since Disney sought to enforce those covenants, it couldn’t deprive the District home-venue:\n\n …. delaying the resolution of this case pending the federal litigation would deny to the District its home-venue privilege. See Carlile v. Game & Fresh Water Fish Comm’n, 354 So. 2d 362, 363-64 (Fla. 1977). Ironically, such a ruling would allow Disney to escape the plain terms of the forum selection clause contained in one of the Agreements that Disney contends is valid under Florida law.\n\nThis was only denial of a motion to dismiss, not a ruling on the merits. But even allowing the lawsuit to proceed is an initial win for Florida. If the state wins the state court lawsuit on the merits, it would mean that much or all of Disney’s federal lawsuit goes away.\n\n\n--Disney Loses Attempt To Dismiss Florida Lawsuit Challenging Reedy Creek Covenants Giving Disney Perpetual Control \n--https://legalinsurrection.com/2023/07/disney-loses-attempt-to-dismiss-florida-lawsuit-challenging-reedy-creek-covenants-giving-disney-perpetual-control/ \n-RETRIEVED-Sat Jul 29 2023 21:17:42 GMT+0200 (Central European Summer Time)",
"mediaType": "text/plain"
}
},
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1094073377875828742/entities/urn:activity:1537228066705641492/activity",
"to": [
"https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public"
],
"cc": [
"https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/816802141879410694",
"https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1094073377875828742/followers"
]
},
{
"type": "Announce",
"actor": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1094073377875828742",
"object": {
"type": "Note",
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/457987271044370432/entities/urn:activity:1536829387280748559",
"attributedTo": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/457987271044370432",
"content": "WATCH: Alex Jones Unleashes Shocking Revelations – Is It The End of Humanity? <br /><br /><br /><a href=\"https://www.infowars.com/posts/watch-alex-jones-unleashes-shocking-revelations-is-it-the-end-of-humanity/\" target=\"_blank\">https://www.infowars.com/posts/watch-alex-jones-unleashes-shocking-revelations-is-it-the-end-of-humanity/</a> ",
"to": [
"https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public"
],
"cc": [
"https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/457987271044370432/followers"
],
"tag": [],
"url": "https://www.minds.com/newsfeed/1536829387280748559",
"published": "2023-08-11T20:11:18+00:00",
"source": {
"content": "WATCH: Alex Jones Unleashes Shocking Revelations – Is It The End of Humanity? \n\n\nhttps://www.infowars.com/posts/watch-alex-jones-unleashes-shocking-revelations-is-it-the-end-of-humanity/ ",
"mediaType": "text/plain"
}
},
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1094073377875828742/entities/urn:activity:1537226028034822153/activity",
"to": [
"https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public"
],
"cc": [
"https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/457987271044370432",
"https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1094073377875828742/followers"
]
},
{
"type": "Announce",
"actor": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1094073377875828742",
"object": {
"type": "Note",
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/457987271044370432/entities/urn:activity:1536882898697719821",
"attributedTo": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/457987271044370432",
"content": " Explain the rise in meat allergies in countries that do not carry the Lonestar tick...<br /><br /><a href=\"https://www.minds.com/search?f=top&t=all&q=faCtChEcKErs\" title=\"#faCtChEcKErs\" class=\"u-url hashtag\" target=\"_blank\">#faCtChEcKErs</a> <a href=\"https://www.minds.com/search?f=top&t=all&q=meat\" title=\"#meat\" class=\"u-url hashtag\" target=\"_blank\">#meat</a> <a href=\"https://www.minds.com/search?f=top&t=all&q=beef\" title=\"#beef\" class=\"u-url hashtag\" target=\"_blank\">#beef</a> <a href=\"https://www.minds.com/search?f=top&t=all&q=alphagal\" title=\"#alphagal\" class=\"u-url hashtag\" target=\"_blank\">#alphagal</a> <br /><a href=\"https://www.minds.com/search?f=top&t=all&q=SupportInfowars\" title=\"#SupportInfowars\" class=\"u-url hashtag\" target=\"_blank\">#SupportInfowars</a>: <a href=\"https://www.infowarsstore.com\" target=\"_blank\">https://www.infowarsstore.com</a> <a href=\"https://www.minds.com/newsfeed/1536882898697719821\" target=\"_blank\">https://www.minds.com/newsfeed/1536882898697719821</a>",
"to": [
"https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public"
],
"cc": [
"https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/457987271044370432/followers"
],
"tag": [],
"url": "https://www.minds.com/newsfeed/1536882898697719821",
"published": "2023-08-11T23:43:56+00:00",
"source": {
"content": " Explain the rise in meat allergies in countries that do not carry the Lonestar tick...\n\n#faCtChEcKErs #meat #beef #alphagal \n#SupportInfowars: https://www.infowarsstore.com https://www.minds.com/newsfeed/1536882898697719821",
"mediaType": "text/plain"
}
},
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1094073377875828742/entities/urn:activity:1537226000444690450/activity",
"to": [
"https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public"
],
"cc": [
"https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/457987271044370432",
"https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1094073377875828742/followers"
]
},
{
"type": "Announce",
"actor": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1094073377875828742",
"object": {
"type": "Note",
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/457987271044370432/entities/urn:activity:1536883630255640582",
"attributedTo": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/457987271044370432",
"content": "VIDEO: Rand Paul Exposes Fauci for Greatest Perjury In Congressional History <a href=\"https://madmaxworld.tv/watch?id=64d6c4f93a4bee5842949668\" target=\"_blank\">https://madmaxworld.tv/watch?id=64d6c4f93a4bee5842949668</a>",
"to": [
"https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public"
],
"cc": [
"https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/457987271044370432/followers"
],
"tag": [],
"url": "https://www.minds.com/newsfeed/1536883630255640582",
"published": "2023-08-11T23:46:50+00:00",
"source": {
"content": "VIDEO: Rand Paul Exposes Fauci for Greatest Perjury In Congressional History https://madmaxworld.tv/watch?id=64d6c4f93a4bee5842949668",
"mediaType": "text/plain"
}
},
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1094073377875828742/entities/urn:activity:1537225943137914889/activity",
"to": [
"https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public"
],
"cc": [
"https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/457987271044370432",
"https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1094073377875828742/followers"
]
},
{
"type": "Announce",
"actor": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1094073377875828742",
"object": {
"type": "Note",
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/457987271044370432/entities/urn:activity:1536885631513268240",
"attributedTo": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/457987271044370432",
"content": "VIDEO: Former Capitol Police Chief Reveals Deep State Set Up Behind January 6th <a href=\"https://madmaxworld.tv/watch?id=64d6b1e83a4bee58428cd1dd\" target=\"_blank\">https://madmaxworld.tv/watch?id=64d6b1e83a4bee58428cd1dd</a> ",
"to": [
"https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public"
],
"cc": [
"https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/457987271044370432/followers"
],
"tag": [],
"url": "https://www.minds.com/newsfeed/1536885631513268240",
"published": "2023-08-11T23:54:47+00:00",
"source": {
"content": "VIDEO: Former Capitol Police Chief Reveals Deep State Set Up Behind January 6th https://madmaxworld.tv/watch?id=64d6b1e83a4bee58428cd1dd ",
"mediaType": "text/plain"
}
},
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1094073377875828742/entities/urn:activity:1537225928717897730/activity",
"to": [
"https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public"
],
"cc": [
"https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/457987271044370432",
"https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1094073377875828742/followers"
]
},
{
"type": "Announce",
"actor": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1094073377875828742",
"object": {
"type": "Note",
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/457987271044370432/entities/urn:activity:1536887905354518530",
"attributedTo": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/457987271044370432",
"content": "Nightmare Bombshell: WEF Scientist Confesses to Plan to End Beef Consumption <a href=\"https://madmaxworld.tv/watch?id=64d6bf923a4bee5842918f18\" target=\"_blank\">https://madmaxworld.tv/watch?id=64d6bf923a4bee5842918f18</a> ",
"to": [
"https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public"
],
"cc": [
"https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/457987271044370432/followers"
],
"tag": [],
"url": "https://www.minds.com/newsfeed/1536887905354518530",
"published": "2023-08-12T00:03:50+00:00",
"source": {
"content": "Nightmare Bombshell: WEF Scientist Confesses to Plan to End Beef Consumption https://madmaxworld.tv/watch?id=64d6bf923a4bee5842918f18 ",
"mediaType": "text/plain"
}
},
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1094073377875828742/entities/urn:activity:1537225919393959943/activity",
"to": [
"https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public"
],
"cc": [
"https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/457987271044370432",
"https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1094073377875828742/followers"
]
},
{
"type": "Announce",
"actor": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1094073377875828742",
"object": {
"type": "Note",
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/457987271044370432/entities/urn:activity:1427490214988746765",
"attributedTo": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/457987271044370432",
"content": "In the wake of the billion-dollar judgment against me by the dark forces, you might be wondering how I’m feeling. The truth is I’m resolute and happy to be a focal point of liberty and freedom in this world. I am at the next level, and all of you are with me. <br /><br /><a href=\"https://www.infowars.com/posts/i-will-not-be-silenced-the-great-reset-is-now-an-audiobook/\" target=\"_blank\">https://www.infowars.com/posts/i-will-not-be-silenced-the-great-reset-is-now-an-audiobook/</a> <a href=\"https://www.minds.com/search?f=top&t=all&q=GreatReset\" title=\"#GreatReset\" class=\"u-url hashtag\" target=\"_blank\">#GreatReset</a> <a href=\"https://www.minds.com/search?f=top&t=all&q=infowars\" title=\"#infowars\" class=\"u-url hashtag\" target=\"_blank\">#infowars</a> <a href=\"https://www.minds.com/search?f=top&t=all&q=1A\" title=\"#1A\" class=\"u-url hashtag\" target=\"_blank\">#1A</a>",
"to": [
"https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public"
],
"cc": [
"https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/457987271044370432/followers"
],
"tag": [],
"url": "https://www.minds.com/newsfeed/1427490214988746765",
"published": "2022-10-14T02:56:28+00:00",
"source": {
"content": "In the wake of the billion-dollar judgment against me by the dark forces, you might be wondering how I’m feeling. The truth is I’m resolute and happy to be a focal point of liberty and freedom in this world. I am at the next level, and all of you are with me. \n\nhttps://www.infowars.com/posts/i-will-not-be-silenced-the-great-reset-is-now-an-audiobook/ #GreatReset #infowars #1A",
"mediaType": "text/plain"
}
},
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1094073377875828742/entities/urn:activity:1537225898309193735/activity",
"to": [
"https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public"
],
"cc": [
"https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/457987271044370432",
"https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1094073377875828742/followers"
]
}
],
"id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1094073377875828742/outbox",
"partOf": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1094073377875828742/outboxoutbox"
}