ActivityPub Viewer

A small tool to view real-world ActivityPub objects as JSON! Enter a URL or username from Mastodon or a similar service below, and we'll send a request with the right Accept header to the server to view the underlying object.

Open in browser →
{ "@context": "https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams", "type": "OrderedCollectionPage", "orderedItems": [ { "type": "Create", "actor": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1067544673007968273", "object": { "type": "Note", "id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1067544673007968273/entities/urn:activity:1758690687244574720", "attributedTo": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1067544673007968273", "content": "I think I am done refining this.... I think....<br /><br />----------<br /><br />Theory of an Absolute God. Conscious ,perception, and comprehension.<br /><br />Man in their infant mind, can only see the god man desires, a god man can comprehend, and thus man puts God in a box, to extol man as kin of God.:Zippydsmlee<br /><br /><br />As a dyslexic who generalizes, trying to explain anything is fun, I go over this in 2 general parts, comprehension covers how we see and understand the concept of god, and application covers in a very general way, the interactions of man and the divine.<br /><br />TL:DR start<br />Before I get to far, rather than saying man created any god, you could say god came to man, but with a caveat. As man evolved enough to clearly see, a defined deity. So from the perspective of the divine, a “God” is “God” and has always been “God”, but man can only see so much, so that same idea, becomes many deity’s. As it feels like, sometimes faith and piety can find a deity, without that deity being directly targeted. So from a human perceptive all they can see, is a specific deity.<br />TL:DR end<br /><br />-<br /><br />So lets start with the understanding that, reality is limited by conscious, perception, and comprehension. For the literalist’s and absolutists with no soul or imagination this dose not mean you make reality, but rather, what you see in reality is limited by your mind.  \"If a tree falls in a forest and no one is around to hear it, does it make a sound?\" <br /><br /><br />Conscious, allows for the framework, of greater interpolation and bifurcation of information. Without higher conscious, you do not see and comprehend, doomed to trod the path of pure instinct.<br /><br /><br />Perception, allows you to clearly see information, and allows for some discernment of information, because you can better categorize and sort information. <br /><br /><br />Comprehension, allows for greater refinement of information, because you can better compare and contrast information.<br /><br />Then, dose it mean we create god? Maybe, but ask yourself, do we create the world around us? Do we create the universe around us? If the divine and god is much greater than man, why do we keep limiting god, to human like concepts? IMO its the limitation of man, to see everything as man.<br /><br />-----<br /><br />Application<br /><br />I seem to lose people, in this “crescendo comprehension of concepts” if you can not generalize, your going to burn down the trees, since you can not see the forest. But, also I need to do better to make myself clear, because the word soup can be overwhelming, and people lack the drive to connect the dots and come up with their own unique thoughts.<br /><br />As a reminder, this is a watery generalization. And remember that god, or gods or the divine, are things far beyond humanity, they are not human. Humans are the ones, that define them and give them names. “Conscious ,perception, comprehension”. Because God and the divine has always been with humanity, and in theory came before, and will go far beyond humanity.<br /><br />From now on I will use the divine to mean god, gods or divinity in general.<br /><br />When you theorize the concept or idea of the divine, you kinda have to treat it as a chicken and the egg scenario. I start with how man comes to be conscious to divinity.<br /><br />Thus you must look at how man first perceived the divine. In a practical logical way, that’s replicable through the eons. So humans, starting with a zero point of awareness, compile their understanding to become more conscious of the divine. I know I am reiterating a lot here, but you have to have a starting point, which creates a snowball effect that can evolve over eons. Because IMO, that’s how humans understand anything, as there are few concepts or ideas that are truly new, they always are shaped by what comes before.<br /><br />So first man saw the divine in nature, and the animals of the wild, because the elements, storm, fire, rain, cold, and animals like wolves or deer’s or even plants, these are simple tactile things, that both can destroy and grant sustenance. Things a people with no real language can feel.<br /><br />As man evolves, so dose culture and language, thus understanding also evoles. So these aspects of the divine, gain new features and functions as man evolves, man’s “conscious, perception, and comprehension”, to see things in a diffrent way.<br /><br />So the, divine elements and the wilds, gain their own emotions and personalities, slowly becoming more human like. As there is a time, where simple human emotions evolve to a point, these divine elements and wilds gain their own human like personality, and thus form.<br /><br />Which then brings us to full on human like deities, which can be seen in the pantheons, and others across the ages.<br /><br />Over time, the abrahamic’s were founded on regional “conscious, perception, and comprehension”. It’s just an amalgamation of what came before, mixed with the ardent wishes and dreams of the writers. Since if man is an instrument or intermediary, its still man, it will be flawed. As touched by the devine is not the same as being devine itself. <br /><br />Dose this invalidate the abrahamic God? No, as God works in mysterious ways, neither dose it invalidate any other God or deity, because divinity works in mysterious ways. Man must always be secondary to the divine, as only the divine is greater than man. <br /><br />The holy works, man can assess, is mans holy word, its touched by divinity yes, but its still mans holy word. <br /><br />And there is a reason I call it “mans holy word”, because the divine dose not directly interfere with man like a parent, but rather is a guide, to allow man to make up their own minds. If divinity can make man perfect, then you would see more perfect people, to bring people to divinity. Faith should not blind you, to a divine or “God”, that’s bigger than man and man’s religion. As there are are enough contradictions and “plot holes” in religion, to diminish them being, absolute on their own, when you blend them you gain greater insight on humanity and the divine. <br /><br /> <br /><br />In other words, when you blend, divinity, deities and God, togather “God” in it’s most pure and absolute form, was always there from the start... “For man in their infant mind, can only see the god man desires, a god man can comprehend, and thus man puts God in a box, to extol man as kin of God.”<br /><br />Final notes:<br />Alright, I poorly tried to return to my quote, but you see the evolutionary processes of theory and philosophy and humanities “conscious, perception, and comprehension” of the divine.<br /><br />Yes this took days to write and nuke grammar, and grammar is still ass, and so I am I. LOL", "to": [ "https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public" ], "cc": [ "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1067544673007968273/followers" ], "tag": [], "url": "https://www.minds.com/newsfeed/1758690687244574720", "published": "2025-04-15T01:28:54+00:00", "source": { "content": "I think I am done refining this.... I think....\n\n----------\n\nTheory of an Absolute God. Conscious ,perception, and comprehension.\n\nMan in their infant mind, can only see the god man desires, a god man can comprehend, and thus man puts God in a box, to extol man as kin of God.:Zippydsmlee\n\n\nAs a dyslexic who generalizes, trying to explain anything is fun, I go over this in 2 general parts, comprehension covers how we see and understand the concept of god, and application covers in a very general way, the interactions of man and the divine.\n\nTL:DR start\nBefore I get to far, rather than saying man created any god, you could say god came to man, but with a caveat. As man evolved enough to clearly see, a defined deity. So from the perspective of the divine, a “God” is “God” and has always been “God”, but man can only see so much, so that same idea, becomes many deity’s. As it feels like, sometimes faith and piety can find a deity, without that deity being directly targeted. So from a human perceptive all they can see, is a specific deity.\nTL:DR end\n\n-\n\nSo lets start with the understanding that, reality is limited by conscious, perception, and comprehension. For the literalist’s and absolutists with no soul or imagination this dose not mean you make reality, but rather, what you see in reality is limited by your mind.  \"If a tree falls in a forest and no one is around to hear it, does it make a sound?\" \n\n\nConscious, allows for the framework, of greater interpolation and bifurcation of information. Without higher conscious, you do not see and comprehend, doomed to trod the path of pure instinct.\n\n\nPerception, allows you to clearly see information, and allows for some discernment of information, because you can better categorize and sort information. \n\n\nComprehension, allows for greater refinement of information, because you can better compare and contrast information.\n\nThen, dose it mean we create god? Maybe, but ask yourself, do we create the world around us? Do we create the universe around us? If the divine and god is much greater than man, why do we keep limiting god, to human like concepts? IMO its the limitation of man, to see everything as man.\n\n-----\n\nApplication\n\nI seem to lose people, in this “crescendo comprehension of concepts” if you can not generalize, your going to burn down the trees, since you can not see the forest. But, also I need to do better to make myself clear, because the word soup can be overwhelming, and people lack the drive to connect the dots and come up with their own unique thoughts.\n\nAs a reminder, this is a watery generalization. And remember that god, or gods or the divine, are things far beyond humanity, they are not human. Humans are the ones, that define them and give them names. “Conscious ,perception, comprehension”. Because God and the divine has always been with humanity, and in theory came before, and will go far beyond humanity.\n\nFrom now on I will use the divine to mean god, gods or divinity in general.\n\nWhen you theorize the concept or idea of the divine, you kinda have to treat it as a chicken and the egg scenario. I start with how man comes to be conscious to divinity.\n\nThus you must look at how man first perceived the divine. In a practical logical way, that’s replicable through the eons. So humans, starting with a zero point of awareness, compile their understanding to become more conscious of the divine. I know I am reiterating a lot here, but you have to have a starting point, which creates a snowball effect that can evolve over eons. Because IMO, that’s how humans understand anything, as there are few concepts or ideas that are truly new, they always are shaped by what comes before.\n\nSo first man saw the divine in nature, and the animals of the wild, because the elements, storm, fire, rain, cold, and animals like wolves or deer’s or even plants, these are simple tactile things, that both can destroy and grant sustenance. Things a people with no real language can feel.\n\nAs man evolves, so dose culture and language, thus understanding also evoles. So these aspects of the divine, gain new features and functions as man evolves, man’s “conscious, perception, and comprehension”, to see things in a diffrent way.\n\nSo the, divine elements and the wilds, gain their own emotions and personalities, slowly becoming more human like. As there is a time, where simple human emotions evolve to a point, these divine elements and wilds gain their own human like personality, and thus form.\n\nWhich then brings us to full on human like deities, which can be seen in the pantheons, and others across the ages.\n\nOver time, the abrahamic’s were founded on regional “conscious, perception, and comprehension”. It’s just an amalgamation of what came before, mixed with the ardent wishes and dreams of the writers. Since if man is an instrument or intermediary, its still man, it will be flawed. As touched by the devine is not the same as being devine itself. \n\nDose this invalidate the abrahamic God? No, as God works in mysterious ways, neither dose it invalidate any other God or deity, because divinity works in mysterious ways. Man must always be secondary to the divine, as only the divine is greater than man. \n\nThe holy works, man can assess, is mans holy word, its touched by divinity yes, but its still mans holy word. \n\nAnd there is a reason I call it “mans holy word”, because the divine dose not directly interfere with man like a parent, but rather is a guide, to allow man to make up their own minds. If divinity can make man perfect, then you would see more perfect people, to bring people to divinity. Faith should not blind you, to a divine or “God”, that’s bigger than man and man’s religion. As there are are enough contradictions and “plot holes” in religion, to diminish them being, absolute on their own, when you blend them you gain greater insight on humanity and the divine. \n\n \n\nIn other words, when you blend, divinity, deities and God, togather “God” in it’s most pure and absolute form, was always there from the start... “For man in their infant mind, can only see the god man desires, a god man can comprehend, and thus man puts God in a box, to extol man as kin of God.”\n\nFinal notes:\nAlright, I poorly tried to return to my quote, but you see the evolutionary processes of theory and philosophy and humanities “conscious, perception, and comprehension” of the divine.\n\nYes this took days to write and nuke grammar, and grammar is still ass, and so I am I. LOL", "mediaType": "text/plain" } }, "id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1067544673007968273/entities/urn:activity:1758690687244574720/activity" }, { "type": "Create", "actor": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1067544673007968273", "object": { "type": "Note", "id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1067544673007968273/entities/urn:activity:1757920166396321792", "attributedTo": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1067544673007968273", "content": "Pardon my lack of good faith argument French... MOTHERFUCKER..... what fucking logic are you using a man is not a woman.<br /><br />No really, there is a huge difference in a man dressing as a woman and acting like a woman, and making claims HE IS A WOMAN. Thus, they need no extra protection BECAUSE EQUAL TREATMENT UNDER THE FUCKING LAW. As dress and behavior is universal and variable, not so much strength and dandily bits.<br /><br />Do you really want to get into a fucking argument over men in women's sports, raping women's achievements in sports due to the huge difference in biology, DO YOU REALLY, MOTHERFUCKER?<br /><br />The only groups that should have extra protections, are the elderly, children and the severely disabled. Everyone else gets treated the same. If you do not do this, then you just retuned, mother fucking caste systems, to society.<br /><br />The logic should be dress code and, to a degree, behaviors are sexless, not ignoring science that the sexes are binary.<br /><br />If you want to get into legal definitions of the sexes, look at average strength, endurance and what's down below. Fully transitioned people could be legally defined as a woman/man for the sake of using mens/women's spaces and prisons. If they have not transitioned then they are larping and god bless them drag is a fun skill to learn, but damn shaving sucks, I have nightmares of shaving everything.....<br /><br />As for slavery the black tribes enslaved and subsumed other tribes, as did EVERY FUCKING HUMAN GROUP, your arguments on slavery are shallow and illogical and not in good faith. You want the kings and nobles to create hard class and caste systems to stick people into , because that's how fucking governments work.<br /><br />So you either strive for merit, personal skill and true individuality, you know the age-old non commie subverted \"equal treatment to equal circumstance\", you have that or you have motherfucking slavery, where the nobles we elected to power play musical chairs with society....fuck off with that commie nonsense....<br /><br />We either decentralize or we subsume, that is the nature of man, oh I can't say that, I mean the nature of humanity.<br /><br /><a class=\"u-url mention\" href=\"https://www.minds.com/disparutoo\" target=\"_blank\">@disparutoo</a><br /> Damnit your living rent free in my head bro!<br /><br /><a href=\"https://x.com/Lor_blueeyes/status/1911174277212025287\" target=\"_blank\">https://x.com/Lor_blueeyes/status/1911174277212025287</a>", "to": [ "https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public" ], "cc": [ "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1067544673007968273/followers" ], "tag": [], "url": "https://www.minds.com/newsfeed/1757920166396321792", "published": "2025-04-12T22:27:08+00:00", "source": { "content": "Pardon my lack of good faith argument French... MOTHERFUCKER..... what fucking logic are you using a man is not a woman.\n\nNo really, there is a huge difference in a man dressing as a woman and acting like a woman, and making claims HE IS A WOMAN. Thus, they need no extra protection BECAUSE EQUAL TREATMENT UNDER THE FUCKING LAW. As dress and behavior is universal and variable, not so much strength and dandily bits.\n\nDo you really want to get into a fucking argument over men in women's sports, raping women's achievements in sports due to the huge difference in biology, DO YOU REALLY, MOTHERFUCKER?\n\nThe only groups that should have extra protections, are the elderly, children and the severely disabled. Everyone else gets treated the same. If you do not do this, then you just retuned, mother fucking caste systems, to society.\n\nThe logic should be dress code and, to a degree, behaviors are sexless, not ignoring science that the sexes are binary.\n\nIf you want to get into legal definitions of the sexes, look at average strength, endurance and what's down below. Fully transitioned people could be legally defined as a woman/man for the sake of using mens/women's spaces and prisons. If they have not transitioned then they are larping and god bless them drag is a fun skill to learn, but damn shaving sucks, I have nightmares of shaving everything.....\n\nAs for slavery the black tribes enslaved and subsumed other tribes, as did EVERY FUCKING HUMAN GROUP, your arguments on slavery are shallow and illogical and not in good faith. You want the kings and nobles to create hard class and caste systems to stick people into , because that's how fucking governments work.\n\nSo you either strive for merit, personal skill and true individuality, you know the age-old non commie subverted \"equal treatment to equal circumstance\", you have that or you have motherfucking slavery, where the nobles we elected to power play musical chairs with society....fuck off with that commie nonsense....\n\nWe either decentralize or we subsume, that is the nature of man, oh I can't say that, I mean the nature of humanity.\n\n@disparutoo\n Damnit your living rent free in my head bro!\n\nhttps://x.com/Lor_blueeyes/status/1911174277212025287", "mediaType": "text/plain" } }, "id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1067544673007968273/entities/urn:activity:1757920166396321792/activity" }, { "type": "Create", "actor": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1067544673007968273", "object": { "type": "Note", "id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1067544673007968273/entities/urn:activity:1718332350238035968", "attributedTo": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1067544673007968273", "content": "Got a brother hl-2380dw , it has a power on problem, if its let on, it will not turn out without leaving it unpluged from the wall for 5-10min. <br /><br />I dunno if tis the main board or the power board, most likely its the main board, but seeking help, kitty kibble or nip.", "to": [ "https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public" ], "cc": [ "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1067544673007968273/followers" ], "tag": [], "url": "https://www.minds.com/newsfeed/1718332350238035968", "published": "2024-12-24T16:39:17+00:00", "attachment": [ { "type": "Document", "url": "https://cdn.minds.com/fs/v1/thumbnail/1718332315379179520/xlarge/", "mediaType": "image/jpeg", "height": 498, "width": 498 } ], "source": { "content": "Got a brother hl-2380dw , it has a power on problem, if its let on, it will not turn out without leaving it unpluged from the wall for 5-10min. \n\nI dunno if tis the main board or the power board, most likely its the main board, but seeking help, kitty kibble or nip.", "mediaType": "text/plain" } }, "id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1067544673007968273/entities/urn:activity:1718332350238035968/activity" }, { "type": "Create", "actor": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1067544673007968273", "object": { "type": "Note", "id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1067544673007968273/entities/urn:activity:1716966297658466304", "attributedTo": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1067544673007968273", "content": "<a class=\"u-url mention\" href=\"https://www.minds.com/FuddBusters\" target=\"_blank\">@FuddBusters</a> <a class=\"u-url mention\" href=\"https://www.minds.com/fourboxesdiner\" target=\"_blank\">@fourboxesdiner</a> <a class=\"u-url mention\" href=\"https://www.minds.com/Kneon\" target=\"_blank\">@Kneon</a> <a class=\"u-url mention\" href=\"https://www.minds.com/thefrontporchc1\" target=\"_blank\">@thefrontporchc1</a> <a class=\"u-url mention\" href=\"https://www.minds.com/IndianJesusOff\" target=\"_blank\">@IndianJesusOff</a> <br /><br />You are cherry-picking, all corporations are foreign adversaries, as many have greater wealth than most nations, they sell their data and do algorithms made to push global agendas. If you want to deal with TikTok, you have to deal with the idea of how the data of Americans is traded to third parties and other nations. You can not go after TikTok, because as we see time and time again, government, does not know how law works and is more than happy to ski down the slippery slope, harming millions of Americans along the way.<br /><br />Data brokers need to be more regulated than the banks. If you ignore the problems with data brokers, then you ignore the core issue of how data is sold to enemy states. And yes, TikTok is a data broker, so is Google, YouTube, Facebook, Sony PlayStation network or Microsoft live, they are all playing games with data.<br /><br />The fix is not going after TikTok but to separate the data broker part of it, into something heavily regulated and tracked by government oversight committees. So you can then go to every corporation and separate the data broker parts from them, force them to be their own company, and have government make sure that data is not abused.<br /><br /><a href=\"https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-4D-Blj-mhM\" target=\"_blank\">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-4D-Blj-mhM</a>", "to": [ "https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public" ], "cc": [ "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1067544673007968273/followers" ], "tag": [], "url": "https://www.minds.com/newsfeed/1716966297658466304", "published": "2024-12-20T22:11:05+00:00", "source": { "content": "@FuddBusters @fourboxesdiner @Kneon @thefrontporchc1 @IndianJesusOff \n\nYou are cherry-picking, all corporations are foreign adversaries, as many have greater wealth than most nations, they sell their data and do algorithms made to push global agendas. If you want to deal with TikTok, you have to deal with the idea of how the data of Americans is traded to third parties and other nations. You can not go after TikTok, because as we see time and time again, government, does not know how law works and is more than happy to ski down the slippery slope, harming millions of Americans along the way.\n\nData brokers need to be more regulated than the banks. If you ignore the problems with data brokers, then you ignore the core issue of how data is sold to enemy states. And yes, TikTok is a data broker, so is Google, YouTube, Facebook, Sony PlayStation network or Microsoft live, they are all playing games with data.\n\nThe fix is not going after TikTok but to separate the data broker part of it, into something heavily regulated and tracked by government oversight committees. So you can then go to every corporation and separate the data broker parts from them, force them to be their own company, and have government make sure that data is not abused.\n\nhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-4D-Blj-mhM", "mediaType": "text/plain" } }, "id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1067544673007968273/entities/urn:activity:1716966297658466304/activity" }, { "type": "Create", "actor": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1067544673007968273", "object": { "type": "Note", "id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1067544673007968273/entities/urn:activity:1713984246667808785", "attributedTo": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1067544673007968273", "content": "You do not hate government enough.<br /><br /><a href=\"https://youtu.be/U9USJwfQ6bU\" target=\"_blank\">https://youtu.be/U9USJwfQ6bU</a>", "to": [ "https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public" ], "cc": [ "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1067544673007968273/followers" ], "tag": [], "url": "https://www.minds.com/newsfeed/1713984246667808785", "published": "2024-12-12T16:41:28+00:00", "source": { "content": "You do not hate government enough.\n\nhttps://youtu.be/U9USJwfQ6bU", "mediaType": "text/plain" } }, "id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1067544673007968273/entities/urn:activity:1713984246667808785/activity" }, { "type": "Create", "actor": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1067544673007968273", "object": { "type": "Note", "id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1067544673007968273/entities/urn:activity:1713983708005928980", "attributedTo": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1067544673007968273", "content": "Everything goes back to IP rights, IP rights starts the monopoly snow ball, captures investment and regulators. Then you have the inmate running the asylum. The reason I focus on IP rights, you either have an endlessly complex corrupt system, that needs endless repair and correction, or no IP rights, that fights corruption via competition. IP rights are thought control, more so when the courts rule on whim....<br /><br />Non competes and most NDAs is usury, but if they lack that big mafia wealth from IP centralization, could they afford to sue over them.<br /><br /><a href=\"https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B1mQB-KCL0I\" target=\"_blank\">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B1mQB-KCL0I</a>", "to": [ "https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public" ], "cc": [ "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1067544673007968273/followers" ], "tag": [], "url": "https://www.minds.com/newsfeed/1713983708005928980", "published": "2024-12-12T16:39:19+00:00", "source": { "content": "Everything goes back to IP rights, IP rights starts the monopoly snow ball, captures investment and regulators. Then you have the inmate running the asylum. The reason I focus on IP rights, you either have an endlessly complex corrupt system, that needs endless repair and correction, or no IP rights, that fights corruption via competition. IP rights are thought control, more so when the courts rule on whim....\n\nNon competes and most NDAs is usury, but if they lack that big mafia wealth from IP centralization, could they afford to sue over them.\n\nhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B1mQB-KCL0I", "mediaType": "text/plain" } }, "id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1067544673007968273/entities/urn:activity:1713983708005928980/activity" }, { "type": "Create", "actor": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1067544673007968273", "object": { "type": "Note", "id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1067544673007968273/entities/urn:activity:1713643188389941255", "attributedTo": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1067544673007968273", "content": "You can boil down the premise of the whole line of thinking, to excess. To live in excess leads to sloppiness, thus leads to more sin. Sin tends to be poison that generates errors and negative outcomes.<br /><br />However, if you're playing a game, that can easily lead to excess, some of those in pop culture, like Melonie Mac, seem to indulge in excess, then report back on how to be a good moral person, by living in excess.... sure its easy to pick on ex addicts and hookers, but the hypocrisy is a bit maddening, sense that's how the woke left act. If you are coming from a place of \"better\" higher morality, then you can not appear to be corrupted, else you come off as a fake grifter. Shad manages to toe the line, mostly because he mostly keeps Christians things to Christians, giving others enough room to learn and grow on their own without the browbeating.. <br /><br /><a class=\"u-url mention\" href=\"https://www.minds.com/shadmbrooks\" target=\"_blank\">@shadmbrooks</a> <a class=\"u-url mention\" href=\"https://www.minds.com/StayOnWatch\" target=\"_blank\">@StayOnWatch</a> <br /><br /><a href=\"https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Irusq7LKZhw\" target=\"_blank\">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Irusq7LKZhw</a>", "to": [ "https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public" ], "cc": [ "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1067544673007968273/followers" ], "tag": [], "url": "https://www.minds.com/newsfeed/1713643188389941255", "published": "2024-12-11T18:06:13+00:00", "source": { "content": "You can boil down the premise of the whole line of thinking, to excess. To live in excess leads to sloppiness, thus leads to more sin. Sin tends to be poison that generates errors and negative outcomes.\n\nHowever, if you're playing a game, that can easily lead to excess, some of those in pop culture, like Melonie Mac, seem to indulge in excess, then report back on how to be a good moral person, by living in excess.... sure its easy to pick on ex addicts and hookers, but the hypocrisy is a bit maddening, sense that's how the woke left act. If you are coming from a place of \"better\" higher morality, then you can not appear to be corrupted, else you come off as a fake grifter. Shad manages to toe the line, mostly because he mostly keeps Christians things to Christians, giving others enough room to learn and grow on their own without the browbeating.. \n\n@shadmbrooks @StayOnWatch \n\nhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Irusq7LKZhw", "mediaType": "text/plain" } }, "id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1067544673007968273/entities/urn:activity:1713643188389941255/activity" }, { "type": "Create", "actor": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1067544673007968273", "object": { "type": "Note", "id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1067544673007968273/entities/urn:activity:1713320758396063761", "attributedTo": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1067544673007968273", "content": "It's a simple fix, white stamp all permits, cut back other resources, but make paying the tax and getting the permits nigh instant and unquestioned. Crime is going to happen regardless of the permits.<br /><br /> IE make the ATF a simple tax stamp printing machine, until you can end the laws associated with the ATF. <br /><br /><a href=\"https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J1-E5csDPdM\" target=\"_blank\">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J1-E5csDPdM</a><br /><br /><a class=\"u-url mention\" href=\"https://www.minds.com/TheReloadSite\" target=\"_blank\">@TheReloadSite</a> ", "to": [ "https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public" ], "cc": [ "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1067544673007968273/followers" ], "tag": [], "url": "https://www.minds.com/newsfeed/1713320758396063761", "published": "2024-12-10T20:45:00+00:00", "source": { "content": "It's a simple fix, white stamp all permits, cut back other resources, but make paying the tax and getting the permits nigh instant and unquestioned. Crime is going to happen regardless of the permits.\n\n IE make the ATF a simple tax stamp printing machine, until you can end the laws associated with the ATF. \n\nhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J1-E5csDPdM\n\n@TheReloadSite ", "mediaType": "text/plain" } }, "id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1067544673007968273/entities/urn:activity:1713320758396063761/activity" }, { "type": "Create", "actor": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1067544673007968273", "object": { "type": "Note", "id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1067544673007968273/entities/urn:activity:1713259854602178569", "attributedTo": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1067544673007968273", "content": "I mean, think it out logically, if you got rid of sex based tiers, you then replace it with skill based tiers. So things would be based around strength and endurance. Which would push out 99% of athletic men into their own categories, leaving weaker men to flounder in the middle of mostly women's categories. The \"men\" in women's sports now are at a clear advantage, so they would not be mixed with women, because they are on average stronger and faster.<br /><br />Mind you, this assumes the strength and endurance tiers are fairly done.<br /><br /><a href=\"https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gPsHc1P815s\" target=\"_blank\">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gPsHc1P815s</a>", "to": [ "https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public" ], "cc": [ "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1067544673007968273/followers" ], "tag": [], "url": "https://www.minds.com/newsfeed/1713259854602178569", "published": "2024-12-10T16:42:59+00:00", "source": { "content": "I mean, think it out logically, if you got rid of sex based tiers, you then replace it with skill based tiers. So things would be based around strength and endurance. Which would push out 99% of athletic men into their own categories, leaving weaker men to flounder in the middle of mostly women's categories. The \"men\" in women's sports now are at a clear advantage, so they would not be mixed with women, because they are on average stronger and faster.\n\nMind you, this assumes the strength and endurance tiers are fairly done.\n\nhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gPsHc1P815s", "mediaType": "text/plain" } }, "id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1067544673007968273/entities/urn:activity:1713259854602178569/activity" }, { "type": "Create", "actor": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1067544673007968273", "object": { "type": "Note", "id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1067544673007968273/entities/urn:activity:1712982493243641867", "attributedTo": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1067544673007968273", "content": "I understand the spectrum of left, collectivism, totalitarianism and right, individualism, anarchy. <br /><br />But I prefer to focus on the constructs of traditionalism and liberalism, I may be better off calling it enlightenment. Since modern liberalism(since the 1900s) is a hellscape created by dogmatic cults.<br /><br />But the focus of my musing is traditionalism as foundational process to human society, and “enlightenment” as a modifier to the process.<br /><br />Traditionalism copies and grows and refines processes from nature, its a very top down and centralized. As an aside centralization scales with how much time and effort civilization puts into micromanaging processes. Its why, people in the west once had more freedom and liberty, as big brother could not watch them 24/7, due to technology, logistics and cost.<br /><br />Via the processes of centralization humans get micromanaged, hence why enlightenment and liberalism began theories to modify the strict nature of traditional systems. Thus “enlightenment and liberalism” can not seek less liberty and freedom for the individual, because if you reduce liberty and freedom, you return to harsh traditional systems, that enslave and slot people into castes like the tribes and empires of old.<br /><br />Remember, I said enlightenment and liberalism is a modifier, it stacks onto traditionalism, to give the individual more freedom and liberty. When liberalism stops giving more liberty and freedom to the individual, the process becomes more ridged and strict, a harsh top down system thats driven by dogmatic thinking. Hence why I say modern liberalism is not liberalism at all, its a religious oligarchy of thought control.<br /><br />Neo and post liberalism not only remove traditionalism from the stack, it also removes liberalism from the stack, which forces the stack to reset to foundational processes, IE “traditional” slave empires and tribes. As traditional process are the founding process for humanity.<br /><br /><a href=\"https://x.com/zippydsmlee/status/1866246539041255773\" target=\"_blank\">https://x.com/zippydsmlee/status/1866246539041255773</a>", "to": [ "https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public" ], "cc": [ "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1067544673007968273/followers" ], "tag": [], "url": "https://www.minds.com/newsfeed/1712982493243641867", "published": "2024-12-09T22:20:51+00:00", "source": { "content": "I understand the spectrum of left, collectivism, totalitarianism and right, individualism, anarchy. \n\nBut I prefer to focus on the constructs of traditionalism and liberalism, I may be better off calling it enlightenment. Since modern liberalism(since the 1900s) is a hellscape created by dogmatic cults.\n\nBut the focus of my musing is traditionalism as foundational process to human society, and “enlightenment” as a modifier to the process.\n\nTraditionalism copies and grows and refines processes from nature, its a very top down and centralized. As an aside centralization scales with how much time and effort civilization puts into micromanaging processes. Its why, people in the west once had more freedom and liberty, as big brother could not watch them 24/7, due to technology, logistics and cost.\n\nVia the processes of centralization humans get micromanaged, hence why enlightenment and liberalism began theories to modify the strict nature of traditional systems. Thus “enlightenment and liberalism” can not seek less liberty and freedom for the individual, because if you reduce liberty and freedom, you return to harsh traditional systems, that enslave and slot people into castes like the tribes and empires of old.\n\nRemember, I said enlightenment and liberalism is a modifier, it stacks onto traditionalism, to give the individual more freedom and liberty. When liberalism stops giving more liberty and freedom to the individual, the process becomes more ridged and strict, a harsh top down system thats driven by dogmatic thinking. Hence why I say modern liberalism is not liberalism at all, its a religious oligarchy of thought control.\n\nNeo and post liberalism not only remove traditionalism from the stack, it also removes liberalism from the stack, which forces the stack to reset to foundational processes, IE “traditional” slave empires and tribes. As traditional process are the founding process for humanity.\n\nhttps://x.com/zippydsmlee/status/1866246539041255773", "mediaType": "text/plain" } }, "id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1067544673007968273/entities/urn:activity:1712982493243641867/activity" }, { "type": "Create", "actor": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1067544673007968273", "object": { "type": "Note", "id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1067544673007968273/entities/urn:activity:1712927293212463108", "attributedTo": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1067544673007968273", "content": "TikTok is doing what corporate America dose.... it and facebook are the tip of the iceberge of spying on Americans...<br /><br />Counterpoint, the algorithm shows you what you were looking for, its based on what you watch.<br /><br /><a href=\"https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i6XHV7rghlU\" target=\"_blank\">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i6XHV7rghlU</a>", "to": [ "https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public" ], "cc": [ "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1067544673007968273/followers" ], "tag": [], "url": "https://www.minds.com/newsfeed/1712927293212463108", "published": "2024-12-09T18:41:30+00:00", "source": { "content": "TikTok is doing what corporate America dose.... it and facebook are the tip of the iceberge of spying on Americans...\n\nCounterpoint, the algorithm shows you what you were looking for, its based on what you watch.\n\nhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i6XHV7rghlU", "mediaType": "text/plain" } }, "id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1067544673007968273/entities/urn:activity:1712927293212463108/activity" }, { "type": "Create", "actor": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1067544673007968273", "object": { "type": "Note", "id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1067544673007968273/entities/urn:activity:1711925425153773582", "attributedTo": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1067544673007968273", "content": "<a href=\"https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=swxhj4eiSNE\" target=\"_blank\">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=swxhj4eiSNE</a><br /><br />I’d argue its not liberalism, that modern liberalism, is not liberalism at all. I think It's time we talk about how liberalism is supposed to be about more freedom and independence from the collective. Modern “liberals” have abused words so much we do not know what they mean anymore.<br /> <br />If you do not grant more freedom and liberty to individuals from collective control, you can not be liberal. It's more fascist or communist or some sort of hybrid of caste based slave empire. They are certainly not liberal. Because the only way for the state to bring about \"equity\" is via slavery.", "to": [ "https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public" ], "cc": [ "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1067544673007968273/followers" ], "tag": [], "url": "https://www.minds.com/newsfeed/1711925425153773582", "published": "2024-12-07T00:20:26+00:00", "source": { "content": "https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=swxhj4eiSNE\n\nI’d argue its not liberalism, that modern liberalism, is not liberalism at all. I think It's time we talk about how liberalism is supposed to be about more freedom and independence from the collective. Modern “liberals” have abused words so much we do not know what they mean anymore.\n \nIf you do not grant more freedom and liberty to individuals from collective control, you can not be liberal. It's more fascist or communist or some sort of hybrid of caste based slave empire. They are certainly not liberal. Because the only way for the state to bring about \"equity\" is via slavery.", "mediaType": "text/plain" } }, "id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1067544673007968273/entities/urn:activity:1711925425153773582/activity" }, { "type": "Create", "actor": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1067544673007968273", "object": { "type": "Note", "id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1067544673007968273/entities/urn:activity:1711859289326358531", "attributedTo": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1067544673007968273", "content": "<a class=\"u-url mention\" href=\"https://www.minds.com/mikeroweworks\" target=\"_blank\">@mikeroweworks</a> <a class=\"u-url mention\" href=\"https://www.minds.com/VivekGRamaswamy\" target=\"_blank\">@VivekGRamaswamy</a> <br /><br /><a href=\"https://youtu.be/DIwQv5AYOtU\" target=\"_blank\">https://youtu.be/DIwQv5AYOtU</a><br /> <br /> <br />This may not be the best use of words, but I feel classical liberalism really dose not have a problem with conservatism, in that, its a process that maximizes liberties and freedoms so you can live independently of collective control.<br /> <br />The problem we are seeing today is not liberalism, its collectivism. Liberalism and enlightenment stack onto traditionalism to grant the individual more freedoms. However neo and post liberalism, via the process of post modern, deconstructionism and dehumanization, remove traditionalism from the stack, they also remove liberalism from the stack. Because neo and post liberalism loath and hate the individual, there can only be the collective, only through the collective can you work for the greater good. Thus all the negative outcomes you see in quote un quote liberalism, stem from neo and post liberalism. Modern liberalism is anything but liberalism, its tyranny, in the name of “better”.<br /><br /><br />", "to": [ "https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public" ], "cc": [ "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1067544673007968273/followers" ], "tag": [ { "type": "Mention", "href": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1601791383427878922", "name": "@VivekGRamaswamy" } ], "url": "https://www.minds.com/newsfeed/1711859289326358531", "published": "2024-12-06T19:57:38+00:00", "source": { "content": "@mikeroweworks @VivekGRamaswamy \n\nhttps://youtu.be/DIwQv5AYOtU\n \n \nThis may not be the best use of words, but I feel classical liberalism really dose not have a problem with conservatism, in that, its a process that maximizes liberties and freedoms so you can live independently of collective control.\n \nThe problem we are seeing today is not liberalism, its collectivism. Liberalism and enlightenment stack onto traditionalism to grant the individual more freedoms. However neo and post liberalism, via the process of post modern, deconstructionism and dehumanization, remove traditionalism from the stack, they also remove liberalism from the stack. Because neo and post liberalism loath and hate the individual, there can only be the collective, only through the collective can you work for the greater good. Thus all the negative outcomes you see in quote un quote liberalism, stem from neo and post liberalism. Modern liberalism is anything but liberalism, its tyranny, in the name of “better”.\n\n\n", "mediaType": "text/plain" } }, "id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1067544673007968273/entities/urn:activity:1711859289326358531/activity" } ], "id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1067544673007968273/outbox", "partOf": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1067544673007968273/outboxoutbox" }