ActivityPub Viewer

A small tool to view real-world ActivityPub objects as JSON! Enter a URL or username from Mastodon or a similar service below, and we'll send a request with the right Accept header to the server to view the underlying object.

Open in browser →
{ "@context": "https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams", "type": "OrderedCollectionPage", "orderedItems": [ { "type": "Create", "actor": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1036541140481875979", "object": { "type": "Note", "id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1036541140481875979/entities/urn:activity:1179394983923113984", "attributedTo": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1036541140481875979", "content": "The male mind in the traditional setting will develop in accordance to its different means of self-preservation:<br /><br />Child -> fully dependant on parents -> socialist mindset<br />Young adult -> needs to develop his own economical nice -> liberal mindset<br />Father -> has found a nice, has steady income, needs to preserve this to ensure his family survival -> conservatism<br /><br />Once the working life ends, a male may revert back to socialism. This will depend on lot on wether he depends on others or has enough capital to see through the rest of his life. If the later is the case, he will stay within the conservative mindset.<br /><br />Young adults that fail to start in their economic independence will in general stay in the socialist mindset. The more autistic traits they have the more they will tend towards full out communism.<br /><br />Males that fail to establish a family usually will stay in the liberal mindset. When intelligent enough and restricted in their economic freedom, they may develop into libertarianism.<br /><br />See my previous posts for a proper background to the above.", "to": [ "https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public" ], "cc": [ "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1036541140481875979/followers" ], "tag": [], "url": "https://www.minds.com/newsfeed/1179394983923113984", "published": "2020-11-28T12:14:36+00:00", "source": { "content": "The male mind in the traditional setting will develop in accordance to its different means of self-preservation:\n\nChild -> fully dependant on parents -> socialist mindset\nYoung adult -> needs to develop his own economical nice -> liberal mindset\nFather -> has found a nice, has steady income, needs to preserve this to ensure his family survival -> conservatism\n\nOnce the working life ends, a male may revert back to socialism. This will depend on lot on wether he depends on others or has enough capital to see through the rest of his life. If the later is the case, he will stay within the conservative mindset.\n\nYoung adults that fail to start in their economic independence will in general stay in the socialist mindset. The more autistic traits they have the more they will tend towards full out communism.\n\nMales that fail to establish a family usually will stay in the liberal mindset. When intelligent enough and restricted in their economic freedom, they may develop into libertarianism.\n\nSee my previous posts for a proper background to the above.", "mediaType": "text/plain" } }, "id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1036541140481875979/entities/urn:activity:1179394983923113984/activity" }, { "type": "Create", "actor": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1036541140481875979", "object": { "type": "Note", "id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1036541140481875979/entities/urn:activity:1179098271453474816", "attributedTo": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1036541140481875979", "content": "In the family / circle of friends / economic circle, each political direction has its own weapons to impose its will:<br /><br />Socialism: Gossip, shaming, ridicule, ostracism<br />Liberalism: Economic exclusion (economic ostracism)<br />Conservatism: Power<br /><br />(HT: Curt Doolittle)", "to": [ "https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public" ], "cc": [ "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1036541140481875979/followers" ], "tag": [], "url": "https://www.minds.com/newsfeed/1179098271453474816", "published": "2020-11-27T16:35:34+00:00", "source": { "content": "In the family / circle of friends / economic circle, each political direction has its own weapons to impose its will:\n\nSocialism: Gossip, shaming, ridicule, ostracism\nLiberalism: Economic exclusion (economic ostracism)\nConservatism: Power\n\n(HT: Curt Doolittle)", "mediaType": "text/plain" } }, "id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1036541140481875979/entities/urn:activity:1179098271453474816/activity" }, { "type": "Create", "actor": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1036541140481875979", "object": { "type": "Note", "id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1036541140481875979/entities/urn:activity:1178676918996889600", "attributedTo": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1036541140481875979", "content": "The three political directions are directly related, maybe even find their origin in the family.<br /><br />(See preceding post: Socialism, Liberalism, Conservatism)<br /><br />There are 4 roles in a family: Mother, Father, Child and Jong adult.<br /><br />The mother (traditionally/evolutionary) has no reliable income and redistributes the family income. Her means of self preservation are socialist in nature.<br /><br />The father has to provide the resources to keep the family alive. He has an income and would like the conditions to remain the same such that this income stream remains intact. His means of self preservation are conservative in nature. <br /><br />Children, having no income, are also socialist in nature. This continues until the child becomes self-supporting and turns into a jong adult.<br /><br />The jong adult is exploring the world and tries to establish himself in it. He needs economic opportunities, even if that means upsetting the status quo. His means of self-preservation are liberal in nature.<br /><br />Note: This is placed in the traditional (evolutionary) model in which our brains have evolved. In the present, our economic overabundance has watered down the traditional model. However the basic principles still stand.", "to": [ "https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public" ], "cc": [ "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1036541140481875979/followers" ], "tag": [], "url": "https://www.minds.com/newsfeed/1178676918996889600", "published": "2020-11-26T12:41:16+00:00", "source": { "content": "The three political directions are directly related, maybe even find their origin in the family.\n\n(See preceding post: Socialism, Liberalism, Conservatism)\n\nThere are 4 roles in a family: Mother, Father, Child and Jong adult.\n\nThe mother (traditionally/evolutionary) has no reliable income and redistributes the family income. Her means of self preservation are socialist in nature.\n\nThe father has to provide the resources to keep the family alive. He has an income and would like the conditions to remain the same such that this income stream remains intact. His means of self preservation are conservative in nature. \n\nChildren, having no income, are also socialist in nature. This continues until the child becomes self-supporting and turns into a jong adult.\n\nThe jong adult is exploring the world and tries to establish himself in it. He needs economic opportunities, even if that means upsetting the status quo. His means of self-preservation are liberal in nature.\n\nNote: This is placed in the traditional (evolutionary) model in which our brains have evolved. In the present, our economic overabundance has watered down the traditional model. However the basic principles still stand.", "mediaType": "text/plain" } }, "id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1036541140481875979/entities/urn:activity:1178676918996889600/activity" }, { "type": "Create", "actor": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1036541140481875979", "object": { "type": "Note", "id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1036541140481875979/entities/urn:activity:1178329644175761408", "attributedTo": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1036541140481875979", "content": "If we assume three fundamental political directions (socialism, liberalism and conservatism) in stead of the traditional left/right paradigm it becomes much easier to analyse why some people are driven to do/say what they do.<br /><br />Each of these three directions opposes the other two.<br /><br />Socialism opposes liberalism and conservatism, liberalism opposes conservatism and socialism, and conservatism opposes socialism and liberalism.<br /><br />Each of these three directions operate at the subconscious level, but rationalisation can bring them fore in much stronger flavours:<br /><br />Socialism -> Communism<br />Liberalism -> Libertarianism<br />Conservatism -> Authoritarianism<br /><br />This can be visualised as shown in the graph.<br /><br /><br /><br /><br />", "to": [ "https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public" ], "cc": [ "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1036541140481875979/followers" ], "tag": [], "url": "https://www.minds.com/newsfeed/1178329644175761408", "published": "2020-11-25T13:41:18+00:00", "source": { "content": "If we assume three fundamental political directions (socialism, liberalism and conservatism) in stead of the traditional left/right paradigm it becomes much easier to analyse why some people are driven to do/say what they do.\n\nEach of these three directions opposes the other two.\n\nSocialism opposes liberalism and conservatism, liberalism opposes conservatism and socialism, and conservatism opposes socialism and liberalism.\n\nEach of these three directions operate at the subconscious level, but rationalisation can bring them fore in much stronger flavours:\n\nSocialism -> Communism\nLiberalism -> Libertarianism\nConservatism -> Authoritarianism\n\nThis can be visualised as shown in the graph.\n\n\n\n\n", "mediaType": "text/plain" } }, "id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1036541140481875979/entities/urn:activity:1178329644175761408/activity" }, { "type": "Create", "actor": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1036541140481875979", "object": { "type": "Note", "id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1036541140481875979/entities/urn:activity:1177619857602007040", "attributedTo": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1036541140481875979", "content": "People's political preferences are usually aligned with their means of self preservation.<br /><br />However people are generally unaware of this.<br /><br />When forced to make their preference known, people will rationalise their choice.<br /><br />I believe this to be the reason for most political disagreement. People will argue their case without knowing where their own choice comes from. The discussions take place on the rational level, but people will be unable to reach agreement because their prime method of self-preservation is different.<br /><br />This also explains why emotions will get high: the subconscious communicates with the conscious through emotions. If rational arguments \"prove\" the opposite of what people feel, emotions become stronger, as people feel threatened in their self-preservation. <br /><br />", "to": [ "https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public" ], "cc": [ "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1036541140481875979/followers" ], "tag": [], "url": "https://www.minds.com/newsfeed/1177619857602007040", "published": "2020-11-23T14:40:53+00:00", "source": { "content": "People's political preferences are usually aligned with their means of self preservation.\n\nHowever people are generally unaware of this.\n\nWhen forced to make their preference known, people will rationalise their choice.\n\nI believe this to be the reason for most political disagreement. People will argue their case without knowing where their own choice comes from. The discussions take place on the rational level, but people will be unable to reach agreement because their prime method of self-preservation is different.\n\nThis also explains why emotions will get high: the subconscious communicates with the conscious through emotions. If rational arguments \"prove\" the opposite of what people feel, emotions become stronger, as people feel threatened in their self-preservation. \n\n", "mediaType": "text/plain" } }, "id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1036541140481875979/entities/urn:activity:1177619857602007040/activity" } ], "id": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1036541140481875979/outbox", "partOf": "https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/1036541140481875979/outboxoutbox" }