A small tool to view real-world ActivityPub objects as JSON! Enter a URL
or username from Mastodon or a similar service below, and we'll send a
request with
the right
Accept
header
to the server to view the underlying object.
{
"@context": [
"https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams",
{
"ostatus": "http://ostatus.org#",
"atomUri": "ostatus:atomUri",
"inReplyToAtomUri": "ostatus:inReplyToAtomUri",
"conversation": "ostatus:conversation",
"sensitive": "as:sensitive",
"toot": "http://joinmastodon.org/ns#",
"votersCount": "toot:votersCount",
"Hashtag": "as:Hashtag"
}
],
"id": "https://urbanists.social/users/markstos/statuses/113515268516686823",
"type": "Note",
"summary": null,
"inReplyTo": null,
"published": "2024-11-20T12:25:37Z",
"url": "https://urbanists.social/@markstos/113515268516686823",
"attributedTo": "https://urbanists.social/users/markstos",
"to": [
"https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public"
],
"cc": [
"https://urbanists.social/users/markstos/followers"
],
"sensitive": false,
"atomUri": "https://urbanists.social/users/markstos/statuses/113515268516686823",
"inReplyToAtomUri": null,
"conversation": "tag:urbanists.social,2024-11-20:objectId=83025962:objectType=Conversation",
"content": "<p><a href=\"https://urbanists.social/tags/webdev\" class=\"mention hashtag\" rel=\"tag\">#<span>webdev</span></a> tip: When I've preparing images for my blog, I run many of them through <a href=\"https://squoosh.app/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow noopener noreferrer\" translate=\"no\"><span class=\"invisible\">https://</span><span class=\"\">squoosh.app/</span><span class=\"invisible\"></span></a></p><p>The file size savings are often 50% to 80% or more with no visible difference in quality. I used the Chrome "Install as App" feature so Squoosh launches and runs as a desktop app.</p><p>Do you have another way you prefer to compress images bound for the web, especially if you use <a href=\"https://urbanists.social/tags/Linux\" class=\"mention hashtag\" rel=\"tag\">#<span>Linux</span></a> ?</p>",
"contentMap": {
"en": "<p><a href=\"https://urbanists.social/tags/webdev\" class=\"mention hashtag\" rel=\"tag\">#<span>webdev</span></a> tip: When I've preparing images for my blog, I run many of them through <a href=\"https://squoosh.app/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow noopener noreferrer\" translate=\"no\"><span class=\"invisible\">https://</span><span class=\"\">squoosh.app/</span><span class=\"invisible\"></span></a></p><p>The file size savings are often 50% to 80% or more with no visible difference in quality. I used the Chrome "Install as App" feature so Squoosh launches and runs as a desktop app.</p><p>Do you have another way you prefer to compress images bound for the web, especially if you use <a href=\"https://urbanists.social/tags/Linux\" class=\"mention hashtag\" rel=\"tag\">#<span>Linux</span></a> ?</p>"
},
"attachment": [],
"tag": [
{
"type": "Hashtag",
"href": "https://urbanists.social/tags/webdev",
"name": "#webdev"
},
{
"type": "Hashtag",
"href": "https://urbanists.social/tags/linux",
"name": "#linux"
}
],
"replies": {
"id": "https://urbanists.social/users/markstos/statuses/113515268516686823/replies",
"type": "Collection",
"first": {
"type": "CollectionPage",
"next": "https://urbanists.social/users/markstos/statuses/113515268516686823/replies?min_id=113538477192278098&page=true",
"partOf": "https://urbanists.social/users/markstos/statuses/113515268516686823/replies",
"items": [
"https://urbanists.social/users/markstos/statuses/113515284994623087",
"https://urbanists.social/users/markstos/statuses/113538477192278098"
]
}
},
"likes": {
"id": "https://urbanists.social/users/markstos/statuses/113515268516686823/likes",
"type": "Collection",
"totalItems": 4
},
"shares": {
"id": "https://urbanists.social/users/markstos/statuses/113515268516686823/shares",
"type": "Collection",
"totalItems": 3
}
}