A small tool to view real-world ActivityPub objects as JSON! Enter a URL
or username from Mastodon or a similar service below, and we'll send a
request with
the right
Accept
header
to the server to view the underlying object.
{
"@context": [
"https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams",
{
"ostatus": "http://ostatus.org#",
"atomUri": "ostatus:atomUri",
"inReplyToAtomUri": "ostatus:inReplyToAtomUri",
"conversation": "ostatus:conversation",
"sensitive": "as:sensitive",
"toot": "http://joinmastodon.org/ns#",
"votersCount": "toot:votersCount",
"litepub": "http://litepub.social/ns#",
"directMessage": "litepub:directMessage"
}
],
"id": "https://tldr.nettime.org/users/remixtures/statuses/114400710534576545/replies",
"type": "Collection",
"first": {
"id": "https://tldr.nettime.org/users/remixtures/statuses/114400710534576545/replies?page=true",
"type": "CollectionPage",
"next": "https://tldr.nettime.org/users/remixtures/statuses/114400710534576545/replies?only_other_accounts=true&page=true",
"partOf": "https://tldr.nettime.org/users/remixtures/statuses/114400710534576545/replies",
"items": [
{
"id": "https://tldr.nettime.org/users/remixtures/statuses/114400795061375887",
"type": "Note",
"summary": null,
"inReplyTo": "https://tldr.nettime.org/users/remixtures/statuses/114400710534576545",
"published": "2025-04-25T21:46:40Z",
"url": "https://tldr.nettime.org/@remixtures/114400795061375887",
"attributedTo": "https://tldr.nettime.org/users/remixtures",
"to": [
"https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public"
],
"cc": [
"https://tldr.nettime.org/users/remixtures/followers"
],
"sensitive": false,
"atomUri": "https://tldr.nettime.org/users/remixtures/statuses/114400795061375887",
"inReplyToAtomUri": "https://tldr.nettime.org/users/remixtures/statuses/114400710534576545",
"conversation": "tag:tldr.nettime.org,2025-04-25:objectId=29628544:objectType=Conversation",
"content": "<p>"Throughout the last twenty-five to thirty years, the top US corporations have given away 90 to 95 percent of their profit to shareholders. They have no money to invest. Why is it that Boeing, which is one of the most successful aircraft companies in the world, are not even able to make a safe aircraft? Because they are doing these huge share buybacks and just don’t have money to invest in R&D.</p><p>In economics textbooks, you learn that the stock market is a way to channel the household savings into corporations so that they can invest. That function doesn’t exist anymore in the United States. The stock market has basically become an ATM for shareholders who are forcing companies to cough up all the profits. If you were to offer protections to these kinds of companies, they just wouldn’t invest.</p><p>They would actually make even greater profits, because they wouldn’t have foreign competition and would be able to raise prices. But then with that extra profit, the hope maybe is that they would invest it and that would raise productivity. But they just won’t do that."</p>",
"contentMap": {
"pt": "<p>"Throughout the last twenty-five to thirty years, the top US corporations have given away 90 to 95 percent of their profit to shareholders. They have no money to invest. Why is it that Boeing, which is one of the most successful aircraft companies in the world, are not even able to make a safe aircraft? Because they are doing these huge share buybacks and just don’t have money to invest in R&D.</p><p>In economics textbooks, you learn that the stock market is a way to channel the household savings into corporations so that they can invest. That function doesn’t exist anymore in the United States. The stock market has basically become an ATM for shareholders who are forcing companies to cough up all the profits. If you were to offer protections to these kinds of companies, they just wouldn’t invest.</p><p>They would actually make even greater profits, because they wouldn’t have foreign competition and would be able to raise prices. But then with that extra profit, the hope maybe is that they would invest it and that would raise productivity. But they just won’t do that."</p>"
},
"attachment": [],
"tag": [],
"replies": {
"id": "https://tldr.nettime.org/users/remixtures/statuses/114400795061375887/replies",
"type": "Collection",
"first": {
"type": "CollectionPage",
"next": "https://tldr.nettime.org/users/remixtures/statuses/114400795061375887/replies?only_other_accounts=true&page=true",
"partOf": "https://tldr.nettime.org/users/remixtures/statuses/114400795061375887/replies",
"items": []
}
},
"likes": {
"id": "https://tldr.nettime.org/users/remixtures/statuses/114400795061375887/likes",
"type": "Collection",
"totalItems": 7
},
"shares": {
"id": "https://tldr.nettime.org/users/remixtures/statuses/114400795061375887/shares",
"type": "Collection",
"totalItems": 2
}
},
{
"id": "https://tldr.nettime.org/users/remixtures/statuses/114400848867584307",
"type": "Note",
"summary": null,
"inReplyTo": "https://tldr.nettime.org/users/remixtures/statuses/114400710534576545",
"published": "2025-04-25T22:00:21Z",
"url": "https://tldr.nettime.org/@remixtures/114400848867584307",
"attributedTo": "https://tldr.nettime.org/users/remixtures",
"to": [
"https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public"
],
"cc": [
"https://tldr.nettime.org/users/remixtures/followers"
],
"sensitive": false,
"atomUri": "https://tldr.nettime.org/users/remixtures/statuses/114400848867584307",
"inReplyToAtomUri": "https://tldr.nettime.org/users/remixtures/statuses/114400710534576545",
"conversation": "tag:tldr.nettime.org,2025-04-25:objectId=29628544:objectType=Conversation",
"content": "<p>"The reason that the so-called China shock was so much more damaging in the United States was because of the nature of America’s political economy. Sweden and Finland of course faced competition from cheap Chinese imports, but their corporations kept investing in raising productivity and diversifying. This allowed them to partly fend off competition, partly by moving into new areas. Workers in these countries also enjoyed the security of an extensive welfare state and what economists call an active labor market policy.</p><p>These workers were retrained and relocated and got help with finding new jobs. In the United States, you don’t have that. Instead you have this parasitic financial market. I think that given the US’s actual political economy, tariffs are going to deliver pain rather than gains."</p>",
"contentMap": {
"pt": "<p>"The reason that the so-called China shock was so much more damaging in the United States was because of the nature of America’s political economy. Sweden and Finland of course faced competition from cheap Chinese imports, but their corporations kept investing in raising productivity and diversifying. This allowed them to partly fend off competition, partly by moving into new areas. Workers in these countries also enjoyed the security of an extensive welfare state and what economists call an active labor market policy.</p><p>These workers were retrained and relocated and got help with finding new jobs. In the United States, you don’t have that. Instead you have this parasitic financial market. I think that given the US’s actual political economy, tariffs are going to deliver pain rather than gains."</p>"
},
"attachment": [],
"tag": [],
"replies": {
"id": "https://tldr.nettime.org/users/remixtures/statuses/114400848867584307/replies",
"type": "Collection",
"first": {
"type": "CollectionPage",
"next": "https://tldr.nettime.org/users/remixtures/statuses/114400848867584307/replies?only_other_accounts=true&page=true",
"partOf": "https://tldr.nettime.org/users/remixtures/statuses/114400848867584307/replies",
"items": []
}
},
"likes": {
"id": "https://tldr.nettime.org/users/remixtures/statuses/114400848867584307/likes",
"type": "Collection",
"totalItems": 2
},
"shares": {
"id": "https://tldr.nettime.org/users/remixtures/statuses/114400848867584307/shares",
"type": "Collection",
"totalItems": 4
}
},
{
"id": "https://tldr.nettime.org/users/remixtures/statuses/114400867031377173",
"type": "Note",
"summary": null,
"inReplyTo": "https://tldr.nettime.org/users/remixtures/statuses/114400710534576545",
"published": "2025-04-25T22:04:58Z",
"url": "https://tldr.nettime.org/@remixtures/114400867031377173",
"attributedTo": "https://tldr.nettime.org/users/remixtures",
"to": [
"https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public"
],
"cc": [
"https://tldr.nettime.org/users/remixtures/followers"
],
"sensitive": false,
"atomUri": "https://tldr.nettime.org/users/remixtures/statuses/114400867031377173",
"inReplyToAtomUri": "https://tldr.nettime.org/users/remixtures/statuses/114400710534576545",
"conversation": "tag:tldr.nettime.org,2025-04-25:objectId=29628544:objectType=Conversation",
"content": "<p>"...Americans have to accept that they are not as good as they used to be. If we are talking about 1950, you could complain that our things are so much better than everyone else’s. If you are not able to sell it somewhere, it must be due to some regulations, some hidden protection, and so on. Even then, that’s a problematic argument. But today, Americans have to accept that they cannot build ships because they have basically run down their own shipbuilding industry.</p><p>They can’t make good semiconductors because they have refused to invest in these industries and have let the Koreans and the Chinese and the Japanese make these chips. To me, America’s response looks like the tantrum of a country that was once the undisputed hegemon of the global economy now having been reduced to a much weaker position, largely thanks to the actions of its own capitalist class. Outsourcing, offshoring, and not investing are the causes of American relative decline."</p><p><a href=\"https://jacobin.com/2025/04/tariffs-protectionism-manufacturing-industrial-policy\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow noopener noreferrer\" translate=\"no\"><span class=\"invisible\">https://</span><span class=\"ellipsis\">jacobin.com/2025/04/tariffs-pr</span><span class=\"invisible\">otectionism-manufacturing-industrial-policy</span></a></p>",
"contentMap": {
"pt": "<p>"...Americans have to accept that they are not as good as they used to be. If we are talking about 1950, you could complain that our things are so much better than everyone else’s. If you are not able to sell it somewhere, it must be due to some regulations, some hidden protection, and so on. Even then, that’s a problematic argument. But today, Americans have to accept that they cannot build ships because they have basically run down their own shipbuilding industry.</p><p>They can’t make good semiconductors because they have refused to invest in these industries and have let the Koreans and the Chinese and the Japanese make these chips. To me, America’s response looks like the tantrum of a country that was once the undisputed hegemon of the global economy now having been reduced to a much weaker position, largely thanks to the actions of its own capitalist class. Outsourcing, offshoring, and not investing are the causes of American relative decline."</p><p><a href=\"https://jacobin.com/2025/04/tariffs-protectionism-manufacturing-industrial-policy\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow noopener noreferrer\" translate=\"no\"><span class=\"invisible\">https://</span><span class=\"ellipsis\">jacobin.com/2025/04/tariffs-pr</span><span class=\"invisible\">otectionism-manufacturing-industrial-policy</span></a></p>"
},
"attachment": [],
"tag": [],
"replies": {
"id": "https://tldr.nettime.org/users/remixtures/statuses/114400867031377173/replies",
"type": "Collection",
"first": {
"type": "CollectionPage",
"next": "https://tldr.nettime.org/users/remixtures/statuses/114400867031377173/replies?only_other_accounts=true&page=true",
"partOf": "https://tldr.nettime.org/users/remixtures/statuses/114400867031377173/replies",
"items": []
}
},
"likes": {
"id": "https://tldr.nettime.org/users/remixtures/statuses/114400867031377173/likes",
"type": "Collection",
"totalItems": 1
},
"shares": {
"id": "https://tldr.nettime.org/users/remixtures/statuses/114400867031377173/shares",
"type": "Collection",
"totalItems": 1
}
}
]
}
}