ActivityPub Viewer

A small tool to view real-world ActivityPub objects as JSON! Enter a URL or username from Mastodon or a similar service below, and we'll send a request with the right Accept header to the server to view the underlying object.

Open in browser →
{ "@context": [ "https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams", { "ostatus": "http://ostatus.org#", "atomUri": "ostatus:atomUri", "inReplyToAtomUri": "ostatus:inReplyToAtomUri", "conversation": "ostatus:conversation", "sensitive": "as:sensitive", "toot": "http://joinmastodon.org/ns#", "votersCount": "toot:votersCount" } ], "id": "https://tldr.nettime.org/users/remixtures/statuses/113532689534182435", "type": "Note", "summary": null, "inReplyTo": "https://tldr.nettime.org/users/remixtures/statuses/113532102791534272", "published": "2024-11-23T14:16:01Z", "url": "https://tldr.nettime.org/@remixtures/113532689534182435", "attributedTo": "https://tldr.nettime.org/users/remixtures", "to": [ "https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public" ], "cc": [ "https://tldr.nettime.org/users/remixtures/followers" ], "sensitive": false, "atomUri": "https://tldr.nettime.org/users/remixtures/statuses/113532689534182435", "inReplyToAtomUri": "https://tldr.nettime.org/users/remixtures/statuses/113532102791534272", "conversation": "tag:tldr.nettime.org,2024-11-23:objectId=21964519:objectType=Conversation", "localOnly": false, "content": "<p>&quot;So it’s not terribly surprising that the Justice Department wants Mehta to break up Google. While we don’t know what Mehta will do, we do know that this won’t be resolved any time soon. While Google will probably have to kill its sweetheart deal with Apple, which is worth as much as $20 billion, it seems unlikely that Google will have to sell Chrome and Android. If the issue is that Google could exploit those products to suppress rival search engines, the judge could simply order Google not to do that, according to Erik Hovenkamp, a professor at Cornell Law School.</p><p>“If Google abides by that, then it gets to keep Chrome and Android,” Hovenkamp said. “A judge is not going to want to break up a big company that generates a lot of popular products, if it thinks that there’s a less intrusive remedy that would eliminate the bad conduct.”</p><p>And again, Google really does not want to sell off Chrome and Android. Google said in a blog post in October, “Splitting off Chrome or Android would break them — and many other things” and would “raise the cost of devices.”</p><p>Then again, if a judge forced Google to sell off Chrome and Android, the company could be forced to make its search engine better in order to fend off competition in the search engine business. But speculating can be a fool’s errand. What we do know is Chrome, at least for another year, is a gateway into the Google ecosystem, so much so you may have even forgotten that Google is watching everything you do when you’re using its browser.&quot;</p><p><a href=\"https://www.vox.com/technology/387375/google-chrome-antitrust-privacy-android\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow noopener noreferrer\" translate=\"no\"><span class=\"invisible\">https://www.</span><span class=\"ellipsis\">vox.com/technology/387375/goog</span><span class=\"invisible\">le-chrome-antitrust-privacy-android</span></a></p>", "contentMap": { "pt": "<p>&quot;So it’s not terribly surprising that the Justice Department wants Mehta to break up Google. While we don’t know what Mehta will do, we do know that this won’t be resolved any time soon. While Google will probably have to kill its sweetheart deal with Apple, which is worth as much as $20 billion, it seems unlikely that Google will have to sell Chrome and Android. If the issue is that Google could exploit those products to suppress rival search engines, the judge could simply order Google not to do that, according to Erik Hovenkamp, a professor at Cornell Law School.</p><p>“If Google abides by that, then it gets to keep Chrome and Android,” Hovenkamp said. “A judge is not going to want to break up a big company that generates a lot of popular products, if it thinks that there’s a less intrusive remedy that would eliminate the bad conduct.”</p><p>And again, Google really does not want to sell off Chrome and Android. Google said in a blog post in October, “Splitting off Chrome or Android would break them — and many other things” and would “raise the cost of devices.”</p><p>Then again, if a judge forced Google to sell off Chrome and Android, the company could be forced to make its search engine better in order to fend off competition in the search engine business. But speculating can be a fool’s errand. What we do know is Chrome, at least for another year, is a gateway into the Google ecosystem, so much so you may have even forgotten that Google is watching everything you do when you’re using its browser.&quot;</p><p><a href=\"https://www.vox.com/technology/387375/google-chrome-antitrust-privacy-android\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow noopener noreferrer\" translate=\"no\"><span class=\"invisible\">https://www.</span><span class=\"ellipsis\">vox.com/technology/387375/goog</span><span class=\"invisible\">le-chrome-antitrust-privacy-android</span></a></p>" }, "attachment": [], "tag": [], "replies": { "id": "https://tldr.nettime.org/users/remixtures/statuses/113532689534182435/replies", "type": "Collection", "first": { "type": "CollectionPage", "next": "https://tldr.nettime.org/users/remixtures/statuses/113532689534182435/replies?only_other_accounts=true&page=true", "partOf": "https://tldr.nettime.org/users/remixtures/statuses/113532689534182435/replies", "items": [] } } }