A small tool to view real-world ActivityPub objects as JSON! Enter a URL
or username from Mastodon or a similar service below, and we'll send a
request with
the right
Accept
header
to the server to view the underlying object.
{
"@context": [
"https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams",
"https://spinster.xyz/schemas/litepub-0.1.jsonld",
{
"@language": "und"
}
],
"id": "https://spinster.xyz/users/grimauld/collections/featured",
"orderedItems": [
{
"@context": [
"https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams",
"https://spinster.xyz/schemas/litepub-0.1.jsonld",
{
"@language": "und"
}
],
"actor": "https://spinster.xyz/users/grimauld",
"atomUri": "https://spinster.xyz/users/grimauld/statuses/104485913627169586",
"attachment": [],
"attributedTo": "https://spinster.xyz/users/grimauld",
"cc": [
"https://spinster.xyz/users/grimauld/followers"
],
"content": "<p>Made a (long!) thing; feel free to repost wherever useful.</p><p>Handy list of questions to ask when evaluating proposed law or public policy:</p><p>* Have you researched the policy in depth, from reliable sources? Do you understand how it interacts with existing legislation?<br />* What evidence would you need to see to change your mind on this policy?<br />* Have you looked for it?<br />* What empirical evidence is this policy based on? Does it stand up to analysis? Is it trustworthy? Is there evidence the policy will fix the problem it is intended to solve? Are there alternative policies that could solve the same problem?<br />* How could this policy be abused? Is it worth it? How did you decide that? Is your view based on facts? Statistics? Idealism?<br />* What bad consequences might this policy have? Are they worth it?<br />* Whom does this policy benefit? Whom does it harm? Whose opinions haven't you heard? Whose opinions haven't you heard *first-hand*?<br />* How does this policy affect the very worst off in society (eg: those who have limited freedom of movement and nowhere to be alone, who have to trust to others' goodwill, in prisons, hospitals, care homes, psych wards, abusive domestic situations etc)?<br />* What do experts in the relevant sectors say?<br />* Are those experts free to speak their minds on this policy without reprisals?<br />* How does this policy intersect with sexual violence? How will it affect survivors? Those with PTSD?<br />* How might this policy affect the court system? Policing? The processes via which future laws are made?<br />* How might this policy affect public health? For different demographics? For historically under-researched and underrepresented demographics?<br />* Which industries benefit from this policy? Are they good for society?<br />* How might this policy affect the environment? Longterm?<br />* How might this policy affect other countries?<br />* If there is precedent for this policy elsewhere in the world, what issues have come up? Has there been any attempt to avoid the same issues?<br />* How might this policy affect society 10 years, 20 years, 50 years, 100 years down the line? Data-collection? Research? Inequality? Are anyone's rights at risk? How will it affect children and their understanding of the world, given they will be raised in a different cultural context from you? What will the world look like through their eyes? Is there a risk of any current freedoms being lost?<br />* If this policy does damage, how possible will it be to repeal it? Is there any historical precedent for the kind of damage it might do? How does this policy affect people's ability to point out flaws in the policy, if they become apparent?<br />* How does this policy affect people from different marginalised groups (eg: religious minorities, people who speak English as a second language)?<br />* Are women saying this policy is dangerous?<br />* If they are, how many would have to say so before you listened?</p>",
"contentMap": {
"en": "<p>Made a (long!) thing; feel free to repost wherever useful.</p><p>Handy list of questions to ask when evaluating proposed law or public policy:</p><p>* Have you researched the policy in depth, from reliable sources? Do you understand how it interacts with existing legislation?<br />* What evidence would you need to see to change your mind on this policy?<br />* Have you looked for it?<br />* What empirical evidence is this policy based on? Does it stand up to analysis? Is it trustworthy? Is there evidence the policy will fix the problem it is intended to solve? Are there alternative policies that could solve the same problem?<br />* How could this policy be abused? Is it worth it? How did you decide that? Is your view based on facts? Statistics? Idealism?<br />* What bad consequences might this policy have? Are they worth it?<br />* Whom does this policy benefit? Whom does it harm? Whose opinions haven't you heard? Whose opinions haven't you heard *first-hand*?<br />* How does this policy affect the very worst off in society (eg: those who have limited freedom of movement and nowhere to be alone, who have to trust to others' goodwill, in prisons, hospitals, care homes, psych wards, abusive domestic situations etc)?<br />* What do experts in the relevant sectors say?<br />* Are those experts free to speak their minds on this policy without reprisals?<br />* How does this policy intersect with sexual violence? How will it affect survivors? Those with PTSD?<br />* How might this policy affect the court system? Policing? The processes via which future laws are made?<br />* How might this policy affect public health? For different demographics? For historically under-researched and underrepresented demographics?<br />* Which industries benefit from this policy? Are they good for society?<br />* How might this policy affect the environment? Longterm?<br />* How might this policy affect other countries?<br />* If there is precedent for this policy elsewhere in the world, what issues have come up? Has there been any attempt to avoid the same issues?<br />* How might this policy affect society 10 years, 20 years, 50 years, 100 years down the line? Data-collection? Research? Inequality? Are anyone's rights at risk? How will it affect children and their understanding of the world, given they will be raised in a different cultural context from you? What will the world look like through their eyes? Is there a risk of any current freedoms being lost?<br />* If this policy does damage, how possible will it be to repeal it? Is there any historical precedent for the kind of damage it might do? How does this policy affect people's ability to point out flaws in the policy, if they become apparent?<br />* How does this policy affect people from different marginalised groups (eg: religious minorities, people who speak English as a second language)?<br />* Are women saying this policy is dangerous?<br />* If they are, how many would have to say so before you listened?</p>"
},
"context": "tag:spinster.xyz,2020-07-09:objectId=15654463:objectType=Conversation",
"conversation": "tag:spinster.xyz,2020-07-09:objectId=15654463:objectType=Conversation",
"id": "https://spinster.xyz/users/grimauld/statuses/104485913627169586",
"inReplyTo": null,
"inReplyToAtomUri": null,
"published": "2020-07-09T21:01:56.767Z",
"replies": {
"items": [
"https://spinster.xyz/users/grimauld/statuses/104485930413544423"
],
"type": "Collection"
},
"sensitive": false,
"summary": "",
"tag": [],
"to": [
"https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public"
],
"type": "Note",
"url": "https://spinster.xyz/@grimauld/posts/104485913627169586"
},
{
"@context": [
"https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams",
"https://spinster.xyz/schemas/litepub-0.1.jsonld",
{
"@language": "und"
}
],
"actor": "https://spinster.xyz/users/grimauld",
"atomUri": "https://spinster.xyz/users/grimauld/statuses/104483567700272032",
"attachment": [],
"attributedTo": "https://spinster.xyz/users/grimauld",
"cc": [
"https://spinster.xyz/users/grimauld/followers"
],
"content": "<p>TRAs like to pretend 'twaw' is logically equivalent to 'bright blues are blue', but it's actually equivalent to 'orange blues are blue'. The one descriptor is not a subset of the other, it's a contradictory alternative</p>",
"contentMap": {
"en": "<p>TRAs like to pretend 'twaw' is logically equivalent to 'bright blues are blue', but it's actually equivalent to 'orange blues are blue'. The one descriptor is not a subset of the other, it's a contradictory alternative</p>"
},
"context": "tag:spinster.xyz,2020-07-09:objectId=15649134:objectType=Conversation",
"conversation": "tag:spinster.xyz,2020-07-09:objectId=15649134:objectType=Conversation",
"id": "https://spinster.xyz/users/grimauld/statuses/104483567700272032",
"inReplyTo": null,
"inReplyToAtomUri": null,
"published": "2020-07-09T11:05:20.092Z",
"replies": {
"first": {
"items": [],
"partOf": "https://spinster.xyz/users/grimauld/statuses/104483567700272032/replies",
"type": "CollectionPage"
},
"id": "https://spinster.xyz/users/grimauld/statuses/104483567700272032/replies",
"type": "Collection"
},
"sensitive": false,
"summary": "",
"tag": [],
"to": [
"https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public"
],
"type": "Note",
"url": "https://spinster.xyz/@grimauld/posts/104483567700272032"
}
],
"totalItems": 2,
"type": "OrderedCollection"
}