A small tool to view real-world ActivityPub objects as JSON! Enter a URL
or username from Mastodon or a similar service below, and we'll send a
request with
the right
Accept
header
to the server to view the underlying object.
{
"@context": [
"https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams",
{
"ostatus": "http://ostatus.org#",
"atomUri": "ostatus:atomUri",
"inReplyToAtomUri": "ostatus:inReplyToAtomUri",
"conversation": "ostatus:conversation",
"sensitive": "as:sensitive",
"toot": "http://joinmastodon.org/ns#",
"votersCount": "toot:votersCount"
}
],
"id": "https://sociale.network/users/oblomov/statuses/109279422871043695",
"type": "Note",
"summary": null,
"inReplyTo": "https://sociale.network/users/oblomov/statuses/109279400274732417",
"published": "2022-11-03T10:34:22Z",
"url": "https://sociale.network/@oblomov/109279422871043695",
"attributedTo": "https://sociale.network/users/oblomov",
"to": [
"https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public"
],
"cc": [
"https://sociale.network/users/oblomov/followers",
"https://mastodon.social/users/blaine",
"https://mastodon.ar.al/users/aral"
],
"sensitive": false,
"atomUri": "https://sociale.network/users/oblomov/statuses/109279422871043695",
"inReplyToAtomUri": "https://sociale.network/users/oblomov/statuses/109279400274732417",
"conversation": "tag:mastodon.social,2022-11-03:objectId=324865138:objectType=Conversation",
"content": "<p><span class=\"h-card\"><a href=\"https://mastodon.social/@blaine\" class=\"u-url mention\">@<span>blaine</span></a></span> <span class=\"h-card\"><a href=\"https://mastodon.ar.al/@aral\" class=\"u-url mention\">@<span>aral</span></a></span> </p><p>To stress the point more: the burden of proof still remains on the BlueSky field. Why are they going for a separate community instead of building from the ground up to be interoperable? What do they offer and why (in the users' interest) does it need a separate non-interoperable protocol to be done?</p>",
"contentMap": {
"en": "<p><span class=\"h-card\"><a href=\"https://mastodon.social/@blaine\" class=\"u-url mention\">@<span>blaine</span></a></span> <span class=\"h-card\"><a href=\"https://mastodon.ar.al/@aral\" class=\"u-url mention\">@<span>aral</span></a></span> </p><p>To stress the point more: the burden of proof still remains on the BlueSky field. Why are they going for a separate community instead of building from the ground up to be interoperable? What do they offer and why (in the users' interest) does it need a separate non-interoperable protocol to be done?</p>"
},
"attachment": [],
"tag": [
{
"type": "Mention",
"href": "https://mastodon.social/users/blaine",
"name": "@blaine@mastodon.social"
},
{
"type": "Mention",
"href": "https://mastodon.ar.al/users/aral",
"name": "@aral@mastodon.ar.al"
}
],
"replies": {
"id": "https://sociale.network/users/oblomov/statuses/109279422871043695/replies",
"type": "Collection",
"first": {
"type": "CollectionPage",
"next": "https://sociale.network/users/oblomov/statuses/109279422871043695/replies?only_other_accounts=true&page=true",
"partOf": "https://sociale.network/users/oblomov/statuses/109279422871043695/replies",
"items": []
}
}
}