A small tool to view real-world ActivityPub objects as JSON! Enter a URL
or username from Mastodon or a similar service below, and we'll send a
request with
the right
Accept
header
to the server to view the underlying object.
{
"@context": [
"https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams",
{
"ostatus": "http://ostatus.org#",
"atomUri": "ostatus:atomUri",
"inReplyToAtomUri": "ostatus:inReplyToAtomUri",
"conversation": "ostatus:conversation",
"sensitive": "as:sensitive",
"toot": "http://joinmastodon.org/ns#",
"votersCount": "toot:votersCount"
}
],
"id": "https://sigmoid.social/users/roban/statuses/109643922753180243/replies",
"type": "Collection",
"first": {
"id": "https://sigmoid.social/users/roban/statuses/109643922753180243/replies?page=true",
"type": "CollectionPage",
"next": "https://sigmoid.social/users/roban/statuses/109643922753180243/replies?only_other_accounts=true&page=true",
"partOf": "https://sigmoid.social/users/roban/statuses/109643922753180243/replies",
"items": [
{
"id": "https://sigmoid.social/users/roban/statuses/109644038380370478",
"type": "Note",
"summary": null,
"inReplyTo": "https://sigmoid.social/users/roban/statuses/109643922753180243",
"published": "2023-01-06T20:00:53Z",
"url": "https://sigmoid.social/@roban/109644038380370478",
"attributedTo": "https://sigmoid.social/users/roban",
"to": [
"https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public"
],
"cc": [
"https://sigmoid.social/users/roban/followers"
],
"sensitive": false,
"atomUri": "https://sigmoid.social/users/roban/statuses/109644038380370478",
"inReplyToAtomUri": "https://sigmoid.social/users/roban/statuses/109643922753180243",
"conversation": "tag:sigmoid.social,2023-01-06:objectId=4213598:objectType=Conversation",
"content": "<p>Let’s see, first you assumed utility was linear (with respect to number of FPs and FNs). You corrected that, but you still assume the individual example-level costs sum up linearly to a total cost. What other non-linearities could be lurking out there? You increased your actioning rate, which led to more customer support tickets, which led to increased response times and overtime charges from your support vendor. Or you decreased it, and you’re now wasting support staff capacity.</p>",
"contentMap": {
"en": "<p>Let’s see, first you assumed utility was linear (with respect to number of FPs and FNs). You corrected that, but you still assume the individual example-level costs sum up linearly to a total cost. What other non-linearities could be lurking out there? You increased your actioning rate, which led to more customer support tickets, which led to increased response times and overtime charges from your support vendor. Or you decreased it, and you’re now wasting support staff capacity.</p>"
},
"attachment": [],
"tag": [],
"replies": {
"id": "https://sigmoid.social/users/roban/statuses/109644038380370478/replies",
"type": "Collection",
"first": {
"type": "CollectionPage",
"next": "https://sigmoid.social/users/roban/statuses/109644038380370478/replies?min_id=109644111140323347&page=true",
"partOf": "https://sigmoid.social/users/roban/statuses/109644038380370478/replies",
"items": [
"https://sigmoid.social/users/roban/statuses/109644111140323347"
]
}
},
"likes": {
"id": "https://sigmoid.social/users/roban/statuses/109644038380370478/likes",
"type": "Collection",
"totalItems": 0
},
"shares": {
"id": "https://sigmoid.social/users/roban/statuses/109644038380370478/shares",
"type": "Collection",
"totalItems": 0
}
}
]
}
}