A small tool to view real-world ActivityPub objects as JSON! Enter a URL
or username from Mastodon or a similar service below, and we'll send a
request with
the right
Accept
header
to the server to view the underlying object.
{
"@context": [
"https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams",
{
"ostatus": "http://ostatus.org#",
"atomUri": "ostatus:atomUri",
"inReplyToAtomUri": "ostatus:inReplyToAtomUri",
"conversation": "ostatus:conversation",
"sensitive": "as:sensitive",
"toot": "http://joinmastodon.org/ns#",
"votersCount": "toot:votersCount",
"Hashtag": "as:Hashtag"
}
],
"id": "https://rhabarberbarbara.bar/users/unagi/statuses/106366679902356329",
"type": "Note",
"summary": null,
"inReplyTo": "https://rhabarberbarbara.bar/users/unagi/statuses/106366500345745178",
"published": "2021-06-07T00:45:32Z",
"url": "https://rhabarberbarbara.bar/@unagi/106366679902356329",
"attributedTo": "https://rhabarberbarbara.bar/users/unagi",
"to": [
"https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public"
],
"cc": [
"https://rhabarberbarbara.bar/users/unagi/followers"
],
"sensitive": false,
"atomUri": "https://rhabarberbarbara.bar/users/unagi/statuses/106366679902356329",
"inReplyToAtomUri": "https://rhabarberbarbara.bar/users/unagi/statuses/106366500345745178",
"conversation": "tag:rhabarberbarbara.bar,2021-06-06:objectId=51603:objectType=Conversation",
"content": "<p>关于“没有情绪的人能更好地完成任务”这种错误看法，<a href=\"https://rhabarberbarbara.bar/tags/HowEmotionsAreMade\" class=\"mention hashtag\" rel=\"tag\">#<span>HowEmotionsAreMade</span></a> 里有这样一段：<br>The figure of the dispassionate judge, who renders emotionless decisions in strict accordance with the law, is an archetype in many societies. The law expects judges to be neutral, as emotion would presumably get in the way of fair decisions. “Good judges pride themselves on the rationality of their rulings and the suppression of their personal proclivities,” wrote the late U.S. Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia, “including most especially their emotions.<br>In some ways, a purely rational approach to legal decision-making sounds compelling and even noble, but as we’ve seen so far, the brain’s wiring doesn’t divide passion from reason. We needn’t work hard to poke holes in this argument; it comes with its own holes pre-drilled. <br>Let’s start with the idea that a judge can be dispassionate, which should beinterpreted as “having no affect*” (rather than “having no emotion”). This idea is a biological impossibility unless that person has suffered brain damage. As we discussed in chapter 4, no decision can ever be free of affect as long as loudmouthed body-budgeting circuitry is driving predictions throughout the brain. <br>Affectless decision-making from the bench is a fairy tale. Robert Jackson, another former Supreme Court justice, described “dispassionate judges” as “mythical beings” like “Santa Claus or Uncle Sam or Easter bunnies.” Direct scientific evidence shows him to be pretty much on target. Remember how judges’ impartiality was easily swayed in parole cases held right before lunchtime, when they attributed their unpleasant affect to the prisoner instead of to hunger (chapter 4)?<br>Common sense dictates that judges experience strong affect in the courtroom. How could they not? They hold people’s futures in their hands. Their working hours are filled with heinous crimes and grievously harmed victims.</p><p>*affect: affect is the general sense of feeling that you experience throughout each day, ranging from unpleasant to pleasant (called valence), and from idle to activated. Affect is a fundamental aspect of consciousness, it occurs in every moment (whether you're aware of it or not, even when you are completely still or asleep) because interoception occurs in every moment. Even a completely neutral feeling is affect. Scientists largely agree that affect is present from birth and that babies can feel and perceive pleasure and displeasure.</p>",
"contentMap": {
"ja": "<p>关于“没有情绪的人能更好地完成任务”这种错误看法，<a href=\"https://rhabarberbarbara.bar/tags/HowEmotionsAreMade\" class=\"mention hashtag\" rel=\"tag\">#<span>HowEmotionsAreMade</span></a> 里有这样一段：<br>The figure of the dispassionate judge, who renders emotionless decisions in strict accordance with the law, is an archetype in many societies. The law expects judges to be neutral, as emotion would presumably get in the way of fair decisions. “Good judges pride themselves on the rationality of their rulings and the suppression of their personal proclivities,” wrote the late U.S. Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia, “including most especially their emotions.<br>In some ways, a purely rational approach to legal decision-making sounds compelling and even noble, but as we’ve seen so far, the brain’s wiring doesn’t divide passion from reason. We needn’t work hard to poke holes in this argument; it comes with its own holes pre-drilled. <br>Let’s start with the idea that a judge can be dispassionate, which should beinterpreted as “having no affect*” (rather than “having no emotion”). This idea is a biological impossibility unless that person has suffered brain damage. As we discussed in chapter 4, no decision can ever be free of affect as long as loudmouthed body-budgeting circuitry is driving predictions throughout the brain. <br>Affectless decision-making from the bench is a fairy tale. Robert Jackson, another former Supreme Court justice, described “dispassionate judges” as “mythical beings” like “Santa Claus or Uncle Sam or Easter bunnies.” Direct scientific evidence shows him to be pretty much on target. Remember how judges’ impartiality was easily swayed in parole cases held right before lunchtime, when they attributed their unpleasant affect to the prisoner instead of to hunger (chapter 4)?<br>Common sense dictates that judges experience strong affect in the courtroom. How could they not? They hold people’s futures in their hands. Their working hours are filled with heinous crimes and grievously harmed victims.</p><p>*affect: affect is the general sense of feeling that you experience throughout each day, ranging from unpleasant to pleasant (called valence), and from idle to activated. Affect is a fundamental aspect of consciousness, it occurs in every moment (whether you're aware of it or not, even when you are completely still or asleep) because interoception occurs in every moment. Even a completely neutral feeling is affect. Scientists largely agree that affect is present from birth and that babies can feel and perceive pleasure and displeasure.</p>"
},
"attachment": [],
"tag": [
{
"type": "Hashtag",
"href": "https://rhabarberbarbara.bar/tags/HowEmotionsAreMade",
"name": "#HowEmotionsAreMade"
}
],
"replies": {
"id": "https://rhabarberbarbara.bar/users/unagi/statuses/106366679902356329/replies",
"type": "Collection",
"first": {
"type": "CollectionPage",
"next": "https://rhabarberbarbara.bar/users/unagi/statuses/106366679902356329/replies?only_other_accounts=true&page=true",
"partOf": "https://rhabarberbarbara.bar/users/unagi/statuses/106366679902356329/replies",
"items": []
}
}
}