A small tool to view real-world ActivityPub objects as JSON! Enter a URL
or username from Mastodon or a similar service below, and we'll send a
request with
the right
Accept
header
to the server to view the underlying object.
{
"@context": [
"https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams",
"https://poa.st/schemas/litepub-0.1.jsonld",
{
"@language": "und"
}
],
"id": "https://poa.st/users/HouseofTolstoy/collections/featured",
"orderedItems": [
{
"@context": [
"https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams",
"https://poa.st/schemas/litepub-0.1.jsonld",
{
"@language": "und"
}
],
"actor": "https://poa.st/users/HouseofTolstoy",
"attachment": [],
"attributedTo": "https://poa.st/users/HouseofTolstoy",
"cc": [
"https://poa.st/users/HouseofTolstoy/followers"
],
"content": "Account migration does not seem to work for me. Either way, moving accounts:<br/><br/><a href=\"https://merovingian.club/@houseoftolstoy\" rel=\"noopener\">merovingian.club/@houseoftolstoy</a><br/><br/>Not that I have a huge amount of followers, but I am moving.",
"content_type": "text/plain",
"context": "https://poa.st/contexts/ce17de03-05c9-473c-bd15-13436d2a21dc",
"conversation": "https://poa.st/contexts/ce17de03-05c9-473c-bd15-13436d2a21dc",
"id": "https://poa.st/objects/7ea2d8a9-470b-463a-bea5-8efe428a37c3",
"published": "2022-09-17T15:07:23.889254Z",
"sensitive": false,
"source": "Account migration does not seem to work for me. Either way, moving accounts:\n\nhttps://merovingian.club/@houseoftolstoy\n\nNot that I have a huge amount of followers, but I am moving.",
"summary": "",
"tag": [],
"to": [
"https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public"
],
"type": "Note"
},
{
"@context": [
"https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams",
"https://poa.st/schemas/litepub-0.1.jsonld",
{
"@language": "und"
}
],
"actor": "https://poa.st/users/HouseofTolstoy",
"attachment": [],
"attributedTo": "https://poa.st/users/HouseofTolstoy",
"cc": [
"https://poa.st/users/HouseofTolstoy/followers"
],
"content": "Made a comment on another poast, figured I would talk more at length here, because why not?<br/><br/>I have noticed an increase in urban planning content on Youtube, namely the type that advocates for "walkable cities." I will not argue that American cities are ideally built when so much of it indeed is car-centric, which is not a model I will defend or advocate for. However, I am wary about this recent push in this type of content because I suspect that it is part of a larger agenda (Agenda 21) to get people to move to "smart cities."<br/><br/>I am not against having cities be less car centric and I think we should have a major overhaul in our zoning practices in the US. I do find it silly that certain building types are banned in some areas in order to just to have a sea of houses that are so far from any store that you need to drive just to get there in a reasonable amount of time. However, I am concerned that this propaganda will later be used to outright ban cars, which for me is certainly a bridge too far.<br/><br/>Sure, it will start with "you don't need a car, we have the public transit system you can use!" Then they will ban cars altogether, because you don't "need" them. Next thing you know, you will find yourself banned from the very public transit system that they insisted would make your car unnecessary because you don't have a high enough social credit score. <br/><br/>Soon enough we will go full "live in the pod and eat the bugs" mode, which you most certainly did not sign up for. But you did not get there with just one step. It was incrementally built up, all starting with some friendly online soyboys talking about how great it is to live in cities that have a lot of "mixed use, walkable areas." Nothing too extreme, friend! But these same individuals will not care one bit about how you start to lose your freedom by living in these cities that gradually became more tyrannical. In fact they will be cheerleading those same changes on later, I am sure, as they will consider the laws part and parcel to living in a city.<br/><br/>Another thing, all the "mixed use walkable cities" that are shilled so strongly for so often are found in countries that are still for the most part racially/culturally homogenous. Yeah, I am sure that the same exact city planning will work out with the same results in the cultural hodgepodge that are most US cities. "Walkable cities have less crime and are safer!" Well, have you considered that there is more to it than your city plan? Oh wait, you haven't, and I am sure you are onboard with having even more diversity come to white countries.",
"content_type": "text/plain",
"context": "https://poa.st/contexts/ff723a53-0146-4f5e-96a7-56272b532b4d",
"conversation": "https://poa.st/contexts/ff723a53-0146-4f5e-96a7-56272b532b4d",
"id": "https://poa.st/objects/e258e8a9-d445-4a39-ace8-7dff725795e7",
"published": "2022-09-13T01:54:09.380523Z",
"repliesCount": 1,
"sensitive": false,
"source": "Made a comment on another poast, figured I would talk more at length here, because why not?\n\nI have noticed an increase in urban planning content on Youtube, namely the type that advocates for \"walkable cities.\" I will not argue that American cities are ideally built when so much of it indeed is car-centric, which is not a model I will defend or advocate for. However, I am wary about this recent push in this type of content because I suspect that it is part of a larger agenda (Agenda 21) to get people to move to \"smart cities.\"\n\nI am not against having cities be less car centric and I think we should have a major overhaul in our zoning practices in the US. I do find it silly that certain building types are banned in some areas in order to just to have a sea of houses that are so far from any store that you need to drive just to get there in a reasonable amount of time. However, I am concerned that this propaganda will later be used to outright ban cars, which for me is certainly a bridge too far.\n\nSure, it will start with \"you don't need a car, we have the public transit system you can use!\" Then they will ban cars altogether, because you don't \"need\" them. Next thing you know, you will find yourself banned from the very public transit system that they insisted would make your car unnecessary because you don't have a high enough social credit score. \n\nSoon enough we will go full \"live in the pod and eat the bugs\" mode, which you most certainly did not sign up for. But you did not get there with just one step. It was incrementally built up, all starting with some friendly online soyboys talking about how great it is to live in cities that have a lot of \"mixed use, walkable areas.\" Nothing too extreme, friend! But these same individuals will not care one bit about how you start to lose your freedom by living in these cities that gradually became more tyrannical. In fact they will be cheerleading those same changes on later, I am sure, as they will consider the laws part and parcel to living in a city.\n\nAnother thing, all the \"mixed use walkable cities\" that are shilled so strongly for so often are found in countries that are still for the most part racially/culturally homogenous. Yeah, I am sure that the same exact city planning will work out with the same results in the cultural hodgepodge that are most US cities. \"Walkable cities have less crime and are safer!\" Well, have you considered that there is more to it than your city plan? Oh wait, you haven't, and I am sure you are onboard with having even more diversity come to white countries.",
"summary": "",
"tag": [],
"to": [
"https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public"
],
"type": "Note"
}
],
"totalItems": 2,
"type": "OrderedCollection"
}