A small tool to view real-world ActivityPub objects as JSON! Enter a URL
or username from Mastodon or a similar service below, and we'll send a
request with
the right
Accept
header
to the server to view the underlying object.
{
"@context": [
"https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams",
"https://poa.st/schemas/litepub-0.1.jsonld",
{
"@language": "en"
}
],
"actor": "https://poa.st/users/Victor_Emmanuel",
"attachment": [
{
"blurhash": "epJH]v~qt7Rjof%MM{WBxuof%MM{RjM{Rj-;j[ayRjWBayRjofj[Rj",
"height": 1197,
"mediaType": "image/png",
"name": "",
"type": "Document",
"url": "https://i.poastcdn.org/c521361394d927236b045c4bf44ee7c316b93e9e2d0b07888f3644a1d86fd2ab.png",
"width": 1320
}
],
"attributedTo": "https://poa.st/users/Victor_Emmanuel",
"cc": [
"https://poa.st/users/Victor_Emmanuel/followers"
],
"content": ""We at the Mating Press Party reject the false dichotomy of the two positions that have been imposed upon Fedi. We are against the feeders who say that all fat is good. That bigger is better, no matter the cost. We reject this for confusion of vice for virtue that it is. For a woman, who's duty to produce children, can not do so if her own body will forbid the man from even reaching her womb.<br/><br/>Yet we also reject the second position of the Muscle girls. Who have based their ideology upon being the opposite of the first. The error here is that women must have fat to feed their children. So by opposing the feeders, they have accomplished their goal.<br/><br/>We propose a third position. One which addresses the failings of the dialectic put before us. We say it is not how much fat a woman has, but how it is distributed. To be soft is feminine, but to not walk isn't human. A woman's body curves more than a man, but curvy must mean a great number of curves not the single one of a circle. <br/><br/>That is why I implore every one of you to shed this false argument who's premises lead to the same conclusion. Understand that a woman who has many children will gain a body that men desire. It is thus our duty as men of this land to gift our women those children."",
"contentMap": {
"en": ""We at the Mating Press Party reject the false dichotomy of the two positions that have been imposed upon Fedi. We are against the feeders who say that all fat is good. That bigger is better, no matter the cost. We reject this for confusion of vice for virtue that it is. For a woman, who's duty to produce children, can not do so if her own body will forbid the man from even reaching her womb.<br/><br/>Yet we also reject the second position of the Muscle girls. Who have based their ideology upon being the opposite of the first. The error here is that women must have fat to feed their children. So by opposing the feeders, they have accomplished their goal.<br/><br/>We propose a third position. One which addresses the failings of the dialectic put before us. We say it is not how much fat a woman has, but how it is distributed. To be soft is feminine, but to not walk isn't human. A woman's body curves more than a man, but curvy must mean a great number of curves not the single one of a circle. <br/><br/>That is why I implore every one of you to shed this false argument who's premises lead to the same conclusion. Understand that a woman who has many children will gain a body that men desire. It is thus our duty as men of this land to gift our women those children.""
},
"context": "https://poa.st/contexts/13cc0b2d-f2a3-4f1f-b918-64ccfa17694b",
"conversation": "https://poa.st/contexts/13cc0b2d-f2a3-4f1f-b918-64ccfa17694b",
"formerRepresentations": {
"orderedItems": [
{
"actor": "https://poa.st/users/Victor_Emmanuel",
"attachment": [
{
"blurhash": "epJH]v~qt7Rjof%MM{WBxuof%MM{RjM{Rj-;j[ayRjWBayRjofj[Rj",
"height": 1197,
"mediaType": "image/png",
"name": "",
"type": "Document",
"url": "https://i.poastcdn.org/c521361394d927236b045c4bf44ee7c316b93e9e2d0b07888f3644a1d86fd2ab.png",
"width": 1320
}
],
"attributedTo": "https://poa.st/users/Victor_Emmanuel",
"cc": [
"https://poa.st/users/Victor_Emmanuel/followers"
],
"content": ""We at the Mating Press Party reject the false dichotomy of the two positions that have been imposed upon Fedi. We are against the feeders who say that all fat is good. That bigger is better, no matter the cost. We reject this for confusion of vice for virtue that it is. For a woman, who's duty to produce children, can not do so if her own body will forbid the man from even reaching her womb.<br/><br/>Yet we also reject the second position of the Muscle girls. Who have based their ideology upon being the opposite of the first. The error here is that women must have fat to feed their children. So by opposing the feeders, they have accomplished their goal.<br/><br/>We propose a third position. One which addresses the failings of the dialectic put before us. We say it is not how much fat a woman has, but how it is distributed. To be soft is feminine, but to not walk isn't human. A woman's body curves more than a man, but curvy must mean a great number of curves not the single one of a circle. <br/><br/>That is why I implore every one of you to shed this false argument who's premises lead to the same conclusion. Understand that a woman who has many children will gain a body that men desire. It is thus our duty as men of this land to gift them those children."",
"contentMap": {
"en": ""We at the Mating Press Party reject the false dichotomy of the two positions that have been imposed upon Fedi. We are against the feeders who say that all fat is good. That bigger is better, no matter the cost. We reject this for confusion of vice for virtue that it is. For a woman, who's duty to produce children, can not do so if her own body will forbid the man from even reaching her womb.<br/><br/>Yet we also reject the second position of the Muscle girls. Who have based their ideology upon being the opposite of the first. The error here is that women must have fat to feed their children. So by opposing the feeders, they have accomplished their goal.<br/><br/>We propose a third position. One which addresses the failings of the dialectic put before us. We say it is not how much fat a woman has, but how it is distributed. To be soft is feminine, but to not walk isn't human. A woman's body curves more than a man, but curvy must mean a great number of curves not the single one of a circle. <br/><br/>That is why I implore every one of you to shed this false argument who's premises lead to the same conclusion. Understand that a woman who has many children will gain a body that men desire. It is thus our duty as men of this land to gift them those children.""
},
"context": "https://poa.st/contexts/13cc0b2d-f2a3-4f1f-b918-64ccfa17694b",
"conversation": "https://poa.st/contexts/13cc0b2d-f2a3-4f1f-b918-64ccfa17694b",
"published": "2023-10-01T03:16:41.973358Z",
"sensitive": false,
"source": {
"content": "\"We at the Mating Press Party reject the false dichotomy of the two positions that have been imposed upon Fedi. We are against the feeders who say that all fat is good. That bigger is better, no matter the cost. We reject this for confusion of vice for virtue that it is. For a woman, who's duty to produce children, can not do so if her own body will forbid the man from even reaching her womb.\n\nYet we also reject the second position of the Muscle girls. Who have based their ideology upon being the opposite of the first. The error here is that women must have fat to feed their children. So by opposing the feeders, they have accomplished their goal.\n\nWe propose a third position. One which addresses the failings of the dialectic put before us. We say it is not how much fat a woman has, but how it is distributed. To be soft is feminine, but to not walk isn't human. A woman's body curves more than a man, but curvy must mean a great number of curves not the single one of a circle. \n\nThat is why I implore every one of you to shed this false argument who's premises lead to the same conclusion. Understand that a woman who has many children will gain a body that men desire. It is thus our duty as men of this land to gift them those children.\"",
"mediaType": "text/plain"
},
"summary": "",
"tag": [],
"to": [
"https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public"
],
"type": "Note",
"updated": "2023-10-01T03:17:00.531767Z"
},
{
"actor": "https://poa.st/users/Victor_Emmanuel",
"attachment": [
{
"blurhash": "epJH]v~qt7Rjof%MM{WBxuof%MM{RjM{Rj-;j[ayRjWBayRjofj[Rj",
"height": 1197,
"mediaType": "image/png",
"name": "",
"type": "Document",
"url": "https://i.poastcdn.org/c521361394d927236b045c4bf44ee7c316b93e9e2d0b07888f3644a1d86fd2ab.png",
"width": 1320
}
],
"attributedTo": "https://poa.st/users/Victor_Emmanuel",
"cc": [
"https://poa.st/users/Victor_Emmanuel/followers"
],
"content": ""We at the Mating Press Party reject the false dichotomy of the two positions that have been imposed upon Fedi. We are against the feeders who say that all fat is good. That bigger is better, no matter the cost. We reject this for confusion of vice for virtue that it is. For a woman, who's duty to produce children, can not do so if her own body will forbid the man from even reaching her womb.<br/><br/>Yet we also reject the second position of the Muscle girls. Who have based their ideology upon being the opposite of the first. The error here is that women must have fat to feed their children. So by opposing the feeders, they have accomplished their goal.<br/><br/>We propose a third position. One which addresses the failings of the dialectic put before us. We say it is not how much fat a woman has, but how it is distributed. To be soft is feminine, but to not walk isn't human. A woman's body curves more than a man, but curvy must mean a great number of curves not the single one of a circle. <br/><br/>That is why I plore every one of you to shed this false argument who's premises lead to the same conclusion. Understand that a woman who has many children will gain a body that men desire. It is thus our duty as men of this land to gift them those children."",
"contentMap": {
"en": ""We at the Mating Press Party reject the false dichotomy of the two positions that have been imposed upon Fedi. We are against the feeders who say that all fat is good. That bigger is better, no matter the cost. We reject this for confusion of vice for virtue that it is. For a woman, who's duty to produce children, can not do so if her own body will forbid the man from even reaching her womb.<br/><br/>Yet we also reject the second position of the Muscle girls. Who have based their ideology upon being the opposite of the first. The error here is that women must have fat to feed their children. So by opposing the feeders, they have accomplished their goal.<br/><br/>We propose a third position. One which addresses the failings of the dialectic put before us. We say it is not how much fat a woman has, but how it is distributed. To be soft is feminine, but to not walk isn't human. A woman's body curves more than a man, but curvy must mean a great number of curves not the single one of a circle. <br/><br/>That is why I plore every one of you to shed this false argument who's premises lead to the same conclusion. Understand that a woman who has many children will gain a body that men desire. It is thus our duty as men of this land to gift them those children.""
},
"context": "https://poa.st/contexts/13cc0b2d-f2a3-4f1f-b918-64ccfa17694b",
"conversation": "https://poa.st/contexts/13cc0b2d-f2a3-4f1f-b918-64ccfa17694b",
"published": "2023-10-01T03:16:41.973358Z",
"sensitive": false,
"source": {
"content": "\"We at the Mating Press Party reject the false dichotomy of the two positions that have been imposed upon Fedi. We are against the feeders who say that all fat is good. That bigger is better, no matter the cost. We reject this for confusion of vice for virtue that it is. For a woman, who's duty to produce children, can not do so if her own body will forbid the man from even reaching her womb.\n\nYet we also reject the second position of the Muscle girls. Who have based their ideology upon being the opposite of the first. The error here is that women must have fat to feed their children. So by opposing the feeders, they have accomplished their goal.\n\nWe propose a third position. One which addresses the failings of the dialectic put before us. We say it is not how much fat a woman has, but how it is distributed. To be soft is feminine, but to not walk isn't human. A woman's body curves more than a man, but curvy must mean a great number of curves not the single one of a circle. \n\nThat is why I plore every one of you to shed this false argument who's premises lead to the same conclusion. Understand that a woman who has many children will gain a body that men desire. It is thus our duty as men of this land to gift them those children.\"",
"mediaType": "text/plain"
},
"summary": "",
"tag": [],
"to": [
"https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public"
],
"type": "Note"
}
],
"totalItems": 2,
"type": "OrderedCollection"
},
"id": "https://poa.st/objects/e9656dff-f9dc-4da4-8f14-733aa33fd4c5",
"published": "2023-10-01T03:16:41.973358Z",
"quotesCount": 1,
"replies": {
"items": [
"https://poa.st/objects/1b4ff7cd-9e72-45f7-8ab4-9bf722f169f2"
],
"type": "Collection"
},
"repliesCount": 3,
"sensitive": false,
"source": {
"content": "\"We at the Mating Press Party reject the false dichotomy of the two positions that have been imposed upon Fedi. We are against the feeders who say that all fat is good. That bigger is better, no matter the cost. We reject this for confusion of vice for virtue that it is. For a woman, who's duty to produce children, can not do so if her own body will forbid the man from even reaching her womb.\n\nYet we also reject the second position of the Muscle girls. Who have based their ideology upon being the opposite of the first. The error here is that women must have fat to feed their children. So by opposing the feeders, they have accomplished their goal.\n\nWe propose a third position. One which addresses the failings of the dialectic put before us. We say it is not how much fat a woman has, but how it is distributed. To be soft is feminine, but to not walk isn't human. A woman's body curves more than a man, but curvy must mean a great number of curves not the single one of a circle. \n\nThat is why I implore every one of you to shed this false argument who's premises lead to the same conclusion. Understand that a woman who has many children will gain a body that men desire. It is thus our duty as men of this land to gift our women those children.\"",
"mediaType": "text/plain"
},
"summary": "",
"tag": [],
"to": [
"https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public"
],
"type": "Note",
"updated": "2023-10-01T03:17:30.480711Z"
}