A small tool to view real-world ActivityPub objects as JSON! Enter a URL
or username from Mastodon or a similar service below, and we'll send a
request with
the right
Accept
header
to the server to view the underlying object.
{
"@context": [
"https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams",
{
"ostatus": "http://ostatus.org#",
"atomUri": "ostatus:atomUri",
"inReplyToAtomUri": "ostatus:inReplyToAtomUri",
"conversation": "ostatus:conversation",
"sensitive": "as:sensitive",
"toot": "http://joinmastodon.org/ns#",
"votersCount": "toot:votersCount"
}
],
"id": "https://mstdn.social/users/jefflicquia/statuses/109569219467604181/activity",
"type": "Create",
"actor": "https://mstdn.social/users/jefflicquia",
"published": "2022-12-24T14:53:27Z",
"to": [
"https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public"
],
"cc": [
"https://mstdn.social/users/jefflicquia/followers"
],
"object": {
"id": "https://mstdn.social/users/jefflicquia/statuses/109569219467604181",
"type": "Note",
"summary": null,
"inReplyTo": null,
"published": "2022-12-24T14:53:27Z",
"url": "https://mstdn.social/@jefflicquia/109569219467604181",
"attributedTo": "https://mstdn.social/users/jefflicquia",
"to": [
"https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public"
],
"cc": [
"https://mstdn.social/users/jefflicquia/followers"
],
"sensitive": false,
"atomUri": "https://mstdn.social/users/jefflicquia/statuses/109569219467604181",
"inReplyToAtomUri": null,
"conversation": "tag:mstdn.social,2022-12-24:objectId=134605223:objectType=Conversation",
"content": "<p>For me, the really odd thing about the quote-tweet debate is that, in one sense, QTs are likely inevitable. This is open source. If people want the feature badly enough, someone will come along and add it.</p><p>The interesting question, to me, is what happens next. The anti-QT folks may have a difficult decision coming: do they block instances with QT support? What would it look like if a bunch of admins made the call to block pro-journalist and pro-people-of-color homeservers over a feature?</p>",
"contentMap": {
"en": "<p>For me, the really odd thing about the quote-tweet debate is that, in one sense, QTs are likely inevitable. This is open source. If people want the feature badly enough, someone will come along and add it.</p><p>The interesting question, to me, is what happens next. The anti-QT folks may have a difficult decision coming: do they block instances with QT support? What would it look like if a bunch of admins made the call to block pro-journalist and pro-people-of-color homeservers over a feature?</p>"
},
"attachment": [],
"tag": [],
"replies": {
"id": "https://mstdn.social/users/jefflicquia/statuses/109569219467604181/replies",
"type": "Collection",
"first": {
"type": "CollectionPage",
"next": "https://mstdn.social/users/jefflicquia/statuses/109569219467604181/replies?min_id=109569236760895565&page=true",
"partOf": "https://mstdn.social/users/jefflicquia/statuses/109569219467604181/replies",
"items": [
"https://mstdn.social/users/jefflicquia/statuses/109569236760895565"
]
}
}
}
}