ActivityPub Viewer

A small tool to view real-world ActivityPub objects as JSON! Enter a URL or username from Mastodon or a similar service below, and we'll send a request with the right Accept header to the server to view the underlying object.

Open in browser →
{ "@context": [ "https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams", { "ostatus": "http://ostatus.org#", "atomUri": "ostatus:atomUri", "inReplyToAtomUri": "ostatus:inReplyToAtomUri", "conversation": "ostatus:conversation", "sensitive": "as:sensitive", "toot": "http://joinmastodon.org/ns#", "votersCount": "toot:votersCount" } ], "id": "https://mstdn.social/users/OT_TC_Amateur/statuses/113301181433801953", "type": "Note", "summary": null, "inReplyTo": "https://mstdn.social/users/OT_TC_Amateur/statuses/113301146388702010", "published": "2024-10-13T17:00:28Z", "url": "https://mstdn.social/@OT_TC_Amateur/113301181433801953", "attributedTo": "https://mstdn.social/users/OT_TC_Amateur", "to": [ "https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public" ], "cc": [ "https://mstdn.social/users/OT_TC_Amateur/followers" ], "sensitive": false, "atomUri": "https://mstdn.social/users/OT_TC_Amateur/statuses/113301181433801953", "inReplyToAtomUri": "https://mstdn.social/users/OT_TC_Amateur/statuses/113301146388702010", "conversation": "tag:mstdn.social,2024-10-13:objectId=450610847:objectType=Conversation", "content": "<p>Of course, one might explain #2 as a metaphor rather than a simile, so &quot;like&quot; is unstated, but then how would one explain #3? Why is the mountain &quot;yours&quot; in MT and part of Tg (and singular, whereas it&#39;s plural in OG and Pesh).</p><p>Explaining #2 and #3 is better than explaining #2 alone, and if MT is original, how did part of Tg tradition &quot;lose&quot; the possessive suffix?</p><p>I still have no explanation for #1, though.<br />3/3</p>", "contentMap": { "en": "<p>Of course, one might explain #2 as a metaphor rather than a simile, so &quot;like&quot; is unstated, but then how would one explain #3? Why is the mountain &quot;yours&quot; in MT and part of Tg (and singular, whereas it&#39;s plural in OG and Pesh).</p><p>Explaining #2 and #3 is better than explaining #2 alone, and if MT is original, how did part of Tg tradition &quot;lose&quot; the possessive suffix?</p><p>I still have no explanation for #1, though.<br />3/3</p>" }, "attachment": [], "tag": [], "replies": { "id": "https://mstdn.social/users/OT_TC_Amateur/statuses/113301181433801953/replies", "type": "Collection", "first": { "type": "CollectionPage", "next": "https://mstdn.social/users/OT_TC_Amateur/statuses/113301181433801953/replies?only_other_accounts=true&page=true", "partOf": "https://mstdn.social/users/OT_TC_Amateur/statuses/113301181433801953/replies", "items": [] } } }