A small tool to view real-world ActivityPub objects as JSON! Enter a URL
or username from Mastodon or a similar service below, and we'll send a
request with
the right
Accept
header
to the server to view the underlying object.
{
"@context": [
"https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams",
{
"ostatus": "http://ostatus.org#",
"atomUri": "ostatus:atomUri",
"inReplyToAtomUri": "ostatus:inReplyToAtomUri",
"conversation": "ostatus:conversation",
"sensitive": "as:sensitive",
"toot": "http://joinmastodon.org/ns#",
"votersCount": "toot:votersCount"
}
],
"id": "https://mathstodon.xyz/users/julesh/statuses/113154497189517487",
"type": "Note",
"summary": null,
"inReplyTo": null,
"published": "2024-09-17T19:16:44Z",
"url": "https://mathstodon.xyz/@julesh/113154497189517487",
"attributedTo": "https://mathstodon.xyz/users/julesh",
"to": [
"https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public"
],
"cc": [
"https://mathstodon.xyz/users/julesh/followers"
],
"sensitive": false,
"atomUri": "https://mathstodon.xyz/users/julesh/statuses/113154497189517487",
"inReplyToAtomUri": null,
"conversation": "tag:mathstodon.xyz,2024-09-17:objectId=114868730:objectType=Conversation",
"content": "<p>Today I had the important realisation that when you write nontrivial code in a current-generation dependently typed programming language, a big chunk of your code is representing a trace of the sequence of states that the unifier would go through if you had a sufficiently smart typechecker. So it's not a coincidence that it feels so much like assembly programming, because in assembly programming your code represents a trace of the sequence of states that the abstract machine would go through if you had a sufficiently smart compiler</p><p>This makes the Lean project both more impressive and more hilarious, they're building on a technology that is *obviously* still a decade or 2 away from bare minimum viability</p>",
"contentMap": {
"en": "<p>Today I had the important realisation that when you write nontrivial code in a current-generation dependently typed programming language, a big chunk of your code is representing a trace of the sequence of states that the unifier would go through if you had a sufficiently smart typechecker. So it's not a coincidence that it feels so much like assembly programming, because in assembly programming your code represents a trace of the sequence of states that the abstract machine would go through if you had a sufficiently smart compiler</p><p>This makes the Lean project both more impressive and more hilarious, they're building on a technology that is *obviously* still a decade or 2 away from bare minimum viability</p>"
},
"attachment": [],
"tag": [],
"replies": {
"id": "https://mathstodon.xyz/users/julesh/statuses/113154497189517487/replies",
"type": "Collection",
"first": {
"type": "CollectionPage",
"next": "https://mathstodon.xyz/users/julesh/statuses/113154497189517487/replies?only_other_accounts=true&page=true",
"partOf": "https://mathstodon.xyz/users/julesh/statuses/113154497189517487/replies",
"items": []
}
},
"likes": {
"id": "https://mathstodon.xyz/users/julesh/statuses/113154497189517487/likes",
"type": "Collection",
"totalItems": 11
},
"shares": {
"id": "https://mathstodon.xyz/users/julesh/statuses/113154497189517487/shares",
"type": "Collection",
"totalItems": 4
}
}