A small tool to view real-world ActivityPub objects as JSON! Enter a URL
or username from Mastodon or a similar service below, and we'll send a
request with
the right
Accept
header
to the server to view the underlying object.
{
"@context": [
"https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams",
{
"ostatus": "http://ostatus.org#",
"atomUri": "ostatus:atomUri",
"inReplyToAtomUri": "ostatus:inReplyToAtomUri",
"conversation": "ostatus:conversation",
"sensitive": "as:sensitive",
"toot": "http://joinmastodon.org/ns#",
"votersCount": "toot:votersCount"
}
],
"id": "https://mastodon.social/users/pwramsey/statuses/109349145231750952/activity",
"type": "Create",
"actor": "https://mastodon.social/users/pwramsey",
"published": "2022-11-15T18:05:41Z",
"to": [
"https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public"
],
"cc": [
"https://mastodon.social/users/pwramsey/followers",
"https://mastodon.cloud/users/geobabbler"
],
"object": {
"id": "https://mastodon.social/users/pwramsey/statuses/109349145231750952",
"type": "Note",
"summary": null,
"inReplyTo": "https://mastodon.cloud/users/geobabbler/statuses/109349100136907232",
"published": "2022-11-15T18:05:41Z",
"url": "https://mastodon.social/@pwramsey/109349145231750952",
"attributedTo": "https://mastodon.social/users/pwramsey",
"to": [
"https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public"
],
"cc": [
"https://mastodon.social/users/pwramsey/followers",
"https://mastodon.cloud/users/geobabbler"
],
"sensitive": false,
"atomUri": "https://mastodon.social/users/pwramsey/statuses/109349145231750952",
"inReplyToAtomUri": "https://mastodon.cloud/users/geobabbler/statuses/109349100136907232",
"conversation": "tag:mastodon.social,2022-11-15:objectId=333161615:objectType=Conversation",
"content": "<p><span class=\"h-card\" translate=\"no\"><a href=\"https://mastodon.cloud/@geobabbler\" class=\"u-url mention\">@<span>geobabbler</span></a></span> Which, from their perspective: totally valid, I think? I feel like the tension between the VC requirement for maximum monetization and the founders vibing and using OSS as a "dev friendly" signal to drive adoption leads to these cycles of "open, fresh start-up" > "closed, maturing enterprise".</p><p>It's the part where OSS is just a temporary phase, a "moment", that remains worrying, and seems to recur in a lot of institutions.</p>",
"contentMap": {
"en": "<p><span class=\"h-card\" translate=\"no\"><a href=\"https://mastodon.cloud/@geobabbler\" class=\"u-url mention\">@<span>geobabbler</span></a></span> Which, from their perspective: totally valid, I think? I feel like the tension between the VC requirement for maximum monetization and the founders vibing and using OSS as a "dev friendly" signal to drive adoption leads to these cycles of "open, fresh start-up" > "closed, maturing enterprise".</p><p>It's the part where OSS is just a temporary phase, a "moment", that remains worrying, and seems to recur in a lot of institutions.</p>"
},
"attachment": [],
"tag": [
{
"type": "Mention",
"href": "https://mastodon.cloud/users/geobabbler",
"name": "@geobabbler@mastodon.cloud"
}
],
"replies": {
"id": "https://mastodon.social/users/pwramsey/statuses/109349145231750952/replies",
"type": "Collection",
"first": {
"type": "CollectionPage",
"next": "https://mastodon.social/users/pwramsey/statuses/109349145231750952/replies?only_other_accounts=true&page=true",
"partOf": "https://mastodon.social/users/pwramsey/statuses/109349145231750952/replies",
"items": []
}
},
"likes": {
"id": "https://mastodon.social/users/pwramsey/statuses/109349145231750952/likes",
"type": "Collection",
"totalItems": 1
},
"shares": {
"id": "https://mastodon.social/users/pwramsey/statuses/109349145231750952/shares",
"type": "Collection",
"totalItems": 0
}
}
}