A small tool to view real-world ActivityPub objects as JSON! Enter a URL
or username from Mastodon or a similar service below, and we'll send a
request with
the right
Accept
header
to the server to view the underlying object.
{
"@context": [
"https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams",
{
"ostatus": "http://ostatus.org#",
"atomUri": "ostatus:atomUri",
"inReplyToAtomUri": "ostatus:inReplyToAtomUri",
"conversation": "ostatus:conversation",
"sensitive": "as:sensitive",
"toot": "http://joinmastodon.org/ns#",
"votersCount": "toot:votersCount"
}
],
"id": "https://mastodon.social/users/eliocamp/statuses/113540483073637669",
"type": "Note",
"summary": null,
"inReplyTo": null,
"published": "2024-11-24T23:18:01Z",
"url": "https://mastodon.social/@eliocamp/113540483073637669",
"attributedTo": "https://mastodon.social/users/eliocamp",
"to": [
"https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public"
],
"cc": [
"https://mastodon.social/users/eliocamp/followers",
"https://hachyderm.io/users/djnavarro"
],
"sensitive": false,
"atomUri": "https://mastodon.social/users/eliocamp/statuses/113540483073637669",
"inReplyToAtomUri": null,
"conversation": "tag:hachyderm.io,2024-11-24:objectId=213412966:objectType=Conversation",
"content": "<p><span class=\"h-card\" translate=\"no\"><a href=\"https://hachyderm.io/@djnavarro\" class=\"u-url mention\">@<span>djnavarro</span></a></span> That's interesting. How could you measure this phenomenon? Could you include a measure of confidence and then use that to weight the average so that people who answer 50% with no confidence essentially don't get counted? Would rephrasing the question to something more concrete like "if you were to chose 100 people at random, how many of them would be X" give more meaningful results?</p>",
"contentMap": {
"en": "<p><span class=\"h-card\" translate=\"no\"><a href=\"https://hachyderm.io/@djnavarro\" class=\"u-url mention\">@<span>djnavarro</span></a></span> That's interesting. How could you measure this phenomenon? Could you include a measure of confidence and then use that to weight the average so that people who answer 50% with no confidence essentially don't get counted? Would rephrasing the question to something more concrete like "if you were to chose 100 people at random, how many of them would be X" give more meaningful results?</p>"
},
"attachment": [],
"tag": [
{
"type": "Mention",
"href": "https://hachyderm.io/users/djnavarro",
"name": "@djnavarro@hachyderm.io"
}
],
"replies": {
"id": "https://mastodon.social/users/eliocamp/statuses/113540483073637669/replies",
"type": "Collection",
"first": {
"type": "CollectionPage",
"next": "https://mastodon.social/users/eliocamp/statuses/113540483073637669/replies?only_other_accounts=true&page=true",
"partOf": "https://mastodon.social/users/eliocamp/statuses/113540483073637669/replies",
"items": []
}
},
"likes": {
"id": "https://mastodon.social/users/eliocamp/statuses/113540483073637669/likes",
"type": "Collection",
"totalItems": 1
},
"shares": {
"id": "https://mastodon.social/users/eliocamp/statuses/113540483073637669/shares",
"type": "Collection",
"totalItems": 0
}
}