A small tool to view real-world ActivityPub objects as JSON! Enter a URL
or username from Mastodon or a similar service below, and we'll send a
request with
the right
Accept
header
to the server to view the underlying object.
{
"@context": [
"https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams",
{
"ostatus": "http://ostatus.org#",
"atomUri": "ostatus:atomUri",
"inReplyToAtomUri": "ostatus:inReplyToAtomUri",
"conversation": "ostatus:conversation",
"sensitive": "as:sensitive",
"toot": "http://joinmastodon.org/ns#",
"votersCount": "toot:votersCount",
"Emoji": "toot:Emoji",
"focalPoint": {
"@container": "@list",
"@id": "toot:focalPoint"
}
}
],
"id": "https://mastodon.social/users/alexcastano/statuses/101222134196246818",
"type": "Note",
"summary": null,
"inReplyTo": "https://metalhead.club/users/mariusor/statuses/101222064469829975",
"published": "2018-12-11T11:19:54Z",
"url": "https://mastodon.social/@alexcastano/101222134196246818",
"attributedTo": "https://mastodon.social/users/alexcastano",
"to": [
"https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public"
],
"cc": [
"https://mastodon.social/users/alexcastano/followers",
"https://metalhead.club/users/mariusor"
],
"sensitive": false,
"atomUri": "https://mastodon.social/users/alexcastano/statuses/101222134196246818",
"inReplyToAtomUri": "https://metalhead.club/users/mariusor/statuses/101222064469829975",
"conversation": "tag:mastodon.social,2018-12-11:objectId=70714032:objectType=Conversation",
"content": "<p><span class=\"h-card\" translate=\"no\"><a href=\"https://metalhead.club/@mariusor\" class=\"u-url mention\">@<span>mariusor</span></a></span> Not a bad idea at all. However, I think I couldn't to our generic library. It's possible to generate empty objects and persist them. This would create the same ID and it would fail in the unique constraint in the database :thaenkin: </p><p>Happy to see other people approaches. Thank you!</p>",
"contentMap": {
"en": "<p><span class=\"h-card\" translate=\"no\"><a href=\"https://metalhead.club/@mariusor\" class=\"u-url mention\">@<span>mariusor</span></a></span> Not a bad idea at all. However, I think I couldn't to our generic library. It's possible to generate empty objects and persist them. This would create the same ID and it would fail in the unique constraint in the database :thaenkin: </p><p>Happy to see other people approaches. Thank you!</p>"
},
"attachment": [],
"tag": [
{
"type": "Mention",
"href": "https://metalhead.club/users/mariusor",
"name": "@mariusor@metalhead.club"
},
{
"id": "https://mastodon.social/emojis/12",
"type": "Emoji",
"name": ":thaenkin:",
"updated": "2017-10-11T22:00:01Z",
"icon": {
"type": "Image",
"mediaType": "image/png",
"url": "https://files.mastodon.social/custom_emojis/images/000/000/012/original/334845559435296768.png"
}
}
],
"replies": {
"id": "https://mastodon.social/users/alexcastano/statuses/101222134196246818/replies",
"type": "Collection",
"first": {
"type": "CollectionPage",
"next": "https://mastodon.social/users/alexcastano/statuses/101222134196246818/replies?only_other_accounts=true&page=true",
"partOf": "https://mastodon.social/users/alexcastano/statuses/101222134196246818/replies",
"items": []
}
},
"likes": {
"id": "https://mastodon.social/users/alexcastano/statuses/101222134196246818/likes",
"type": "Collection",
"totalItems": 0
},
"shares": {
"id": "https://mastodon.social/users/alexcastano/statuses/101222134196246818/shares",
"type": "Collection",
"totalItems": 0
}
}