A small tool to view real-world ActivityPub objects as JSON! Enter a URL
or username from Mastodon or a similar service below, and we'll send a
request with
the right
Accept
header
to the server to view the underlying object.
{
"@context": [
"https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams",
{
"ostatus": "http://ostatus.org#",
"atomUri": "ostatus:atomUri",
"inReplyToAtomUri": "ostatus:inReplyToAtomUri",
"conversation": "ostatus:conversation",
"sensitive": "as:sensitive",
"toot": "http://joinmastodon.org/ns#",
"votersCount": "toot:votersCount"
}
],
"id": "https://mastodon.cr.yp.to/users/djb/statuses/111029765306460487/activity",
"type": "Create",
"actor": "https://mastodon.cr.yp.to/users/djb",
"published": "2023-09-08T13:29:28Z",
"to": [
"https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public"
],
"cc": [
"https://mastodon.cr.yp.to/users/djb/followers",
"https://ioc.exchange/users/Elliptickiwi"
],
"object": {
"id": "https://mastodon.cr.yp.to/users/djb/statuses/111029765306460487",
"type": "Note",
"summary": null,
"inReplyTo": "https://ioc.exchange/users/Elliptickiwi/statuses/111028852962553570",
"published": "2023-09-08T13:29:28Z",
"url": "https://mastodon.cr.yp.to/@djb/111029765306460487",
"attributedTo": "https://mastodon.cr.yp.to/users/djb",
"to": [
"https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public"
],
"cc": [
"https://mastodon.cr.yp.to/users/djb/followers",
"https://ioc.exchange/users/Elliptickiwi"
],
"sensitive": false,
"atomUri": "https://mastodon.cr.yp.to/users/djb/statuses/111029765306460487",
"inReplyToAtomUri": "https://ioc.exchange/users/Elliptickiwi/statuses/111028852962553570",
"conversation": "tag:cr.yp.to,2023-09-06:objectId=28528:objectType=Conversation",
"content": "<p><span class=\"h-card\" translate=\"no\"><a href=\"https://ioc.exchange/@Elliptickiwi\" class=\"u-url mention\">@<span>Elliptickiwi</span></a></span> Section 3.4 talks about a mistake in one preprint. The preprint is mostly a survey but has a (maybe-)new theorem where my first "proof" was simply wrong. That mistake was caught last year, before this year's computer-checking process for the preprint, but it would have been better for me to do the computer-checking before putting out the preprint in the first place. I'm now thinking about submission, and I'm sure the referees will be happy to hear about the computer-checked proofs.</p>",
"contentMap": {
"en": "<p><span class=\"h-card\" translate=\"no\"><a href=\"https://ioc.exchange/@Elliptickiwi\" class=\"u-url mention\">@<span>Elliptickiwi</span></a></span> Section 3.4 talks about a mistake in one preprint. The preprint is mostly a survey but has a (maybe-)new theorem where my first "proof" was simply wrong. That mistake was caught last year, before this year's computer-checking process for the preprint, but it would have been better for me to do the computer-checking before putting out the preprint in the first place. I'm now thinking about submission, and I'm sure the referees will be happy to hear about the computer-checked proofs.</p>"
},
"attachment": [],
"tag": [
{
"type": "Mention",
"href": "https://ioc.exchange/users/Elliptickiwi",
"name": "@Elliptickiwi@ioc.exchange"
}
],
"replies": {
"id": "https://mastodon.cr.yp.to/users/djb/statuses/111029765306460487/replies",
"type": "Collection",
"first": {
"type": "CollectionPage",
"next": "https://mastodon.cr.yp.to/users/djb/statuses/111029765306460487/replies?min_id=111029773551798642&page=true",
"partOf": "https://mastodon.cr.yp.to/users/djb/statuses/111029765306460487/replies",
"items": [
"https://mastodon.cr.yp.to/users/djb/statuses/111029773551798642"
]
}
}
}
}