A small tool to view real-world ActivityPub objects as JSON! Enter a URL
or username from Mastodon or a similar service below, and we'll send a
request with
the right
Accept
header
to the server to view the underlying object.
{
"@context": [
"https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams",
{
"ostatus": "http://ostatus.org#",
"atomUri": "ostatus:atomUri",
"inReplyToAtomUri": "ostatus:inReplyToAtomUri",
"conversation": "ostatus:conversation",
"sensitive": "as:sensitive",
"toot": "http://joinmastodon.org/ns#",
"votersCount": "toot:votersCount",
"litepub": "http://litepub.social/ns#",
"directMessage": "litepub:directMessage",
"Hashtag": "as:Hashtag"
}
],
"id": "https://infosec.exchange/users/paco/statuses/114479253836639747",
"type": "Note",
"summary": null,
"inReplyTo": null,
"published": "2025-05-09T18:19:46Z",
"url": "https://infosec.exchange/@paco/114479253836639747",
"attributedTo": "https://infosec.exchange/users/paco",
"to": [
"https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public"
],
"cc": [
"https://infosec.exchange/users/paco/followers"
],
"sensitive": false,
"atomUri": "https://infosec.exchange/users/paco/statuses/114479253836639747",
"inReplyToAtomUri": null,
"conversation": "tag:infosec.exchange,2025-05-09:objectId=269565603:objectType=Conversation",
"content": "<p>This article is a year old, but it's kind of a hilarious statement if you look at it a certain way. <a href=\"https://infosec.exchange/tags/Google\" class=\"mention hashtag\" rel=\"tag\">#<span>Google</span></a> CEO Pichai says:</p><p>Based on our testing, we are encouraged that we are seeing an increase in search usage among people who use the new AI overviews</p><p>Now, if the AI summary was really good, wouldn't it cause less searching? I mean, if the AI gave you what you were after, you wouldn't keep searching, would you? We know more searches == more ads == more money for Google. So more searches is clearly what Google wants. But to suggest that people are seaching more because searches are improving is illogical.</p><p>The tail end of the sentence is meant to make it sound good:</p><p>...as well as increased user satisfaction with the results</p><p>It's hard to know without more context what \"results\" people are more satisfied with. AI results or search results? I don't understand how \"doing more searches\" could be consistent with \"increased user satisfaction with [search] results.\" And if they meant \"increased satisfaction with [AI Overview] results\" then they're misleading you. AI can constantly get better than it is, without ever getting good.<br><a href=\"https://infosec.exchange/tags/web\" class=\"mention hashtag\" rel=\"tag\">#<span>web</span></a> <a href=\"https://infosec.exchange/tags/seo\" class=\"mention hashtag\" rel=\"tag\">#<span>seo</span></a> <a href=\"https://infosec.exchange/tags/search\" class=\"mention hashtag\" rel=\"tag\">#<span>search</span></a></p>",
"contentMap": {
"en": "<p>This article is a year old, but it's kind of a hilarious statement if you look at it a certain way. <a href=\"https://infosec.exchange/tags/Google\" class=\"mention hashtag\" rel=\"tag\">#<span>Google</span></a> CEO Pichai says:</p><p>Based on our testing, we are encouraged that we are seeing an increase in search usage among people who use the new AI overviews</p><p>Now, if the AI summary was really good, wouldn't it cause less searching? I mean, if the AI gave you what you were after, you wouldn't keep searching, would you? We know more searches == more ads == more money for Google. So more searches is clearly what Google wants. But to suggest that people are seaching more because searches are improving is illogical.</p><p>The tail end of the sentence is meant to make it sound good:</p><p>...as well as increased user satisfaction with the results</p><p>It's hard to know without more context what \"results\" people are more satisfied with. AI results or search results? I don't understand how \"doing more searches\" could be consistent with \"increased user satisfaction with [search] results.\" And if they meant \"increased satisfaction with [AI Overview] results\" then they're misleading you. AI can constantly get better than it is, without ever getting good.<br><a href=\"https://infosec.exchange/tags/web\" class=\"mention hashtag\" rel=\"tag\">#<span>web</span></a> <a href=\"https://infosec.exchange/tags/seo\" class=\"mention hashtag\" rel=\"tag\">#<span>seo</span></a> <a href=\"https://infosec.exchange/tags/search\" class=\"mention hashtag\" rel=\"tag\">#<span>search</span></a></p>"
},
"updated": "2025-05-11T21:01:39Z",
"attachment": [],
"tag": [
{
"type": "Hashtag",
"href": "https://infosec.exchange/tags/google",
"name": "#google"
},
{
"type": "Hashtag",
"href": "https://infosec.exchange/tags/web",
"name": "#web"
},
{
"type": "Hashtag",
"href": "https://infosec.exchange/tags/seo",
"name": "#seo"
},
{
"type": "Hashtag",
"href": "https://infosec.exchange/tags/search",
"name": "#search"
}
],
"replies": {
"id": "https://infosec.exchange/users/paco/statuses/114479253836639747/replies",
"type": "Collection",
"first": {
"type": "CollectionPage",
"next": "https://infosec.exchange/users/paco/statuses/114479253836639747/replies?only_other_accounts=true&page=true",
"partOf": "https://infosec.exchange/users/paco/statuses/114479253836639747/replies",
"items": []
}
},
"likes": {
"id": "https://infosec.exchange/users/paco/statuses/114479253836639747/likes",
"type": "Collection",
"totalItems": 4
},
"shares": {
"id": "https://infosec.exchange/users/paco/statuses/114479253836639747/shares",
"type": "Collection",
"totalItems": 3
}
}