A small tool to view real-world ActivityPub objects as JSON! Enter a URL
or username from Mastodon or a similar service below, and we'll send a
request with
the right
Accept
header
to the server to view the underlying object.
{
"@context": [
"https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams",
{
"ostatus": "http://ostatus.org#",
"atomUri": "ostatus:atomUri",
"inReplyToAtomUri": "ostatus:inReplyToAtomUri",
"conversation": "ostatus:conversation",
"sensitive": "as:sensitive",
"toot": "http://joinmastodon.org/ns#",
"votersCount": "toot:votersCount",
"litepub": "http://litepub.social/ns#",
"directMessage": "litepub:directMessage"
}
],
"id": "https://infosec.exchange/users/dostalcody/statuses/113478344942102377",
"type": "Note",
"summary": null,
"inReplyTo": "https://mastodon.social/users/UnsettlingEmpire/statuses/113478335267535067",
"published": "2024-11-13T23:55:28Z",
"url": "https://infosec.exchange/@dostalcody/113478344942102377",
"attributedTo": "https://infosec.exchange/users/dostalcody",
"to": [
"https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public"
],
"cc": [
"https://infosec.exchange/users/dostalcody/followers",
"https://mastodon.social/users/UnsettlingEmpire"
],
"sensitive": false,
"atomUri": "https://infosec.exchange/users/dostalcody/statuses/113478344942102377",
"inReplyToAtomUri": "https://mastodon.social/users/UnsettlingEmpire/statuses/113478335267535067",
"conversation": "tag:mastodon.social,2024-11-13:objectId=847209510:objectType=Conversation",
"content": "<p><span class=\"h-card\" translate=\"no\"><a href=\"https://mastodon.social/@UnsettlingEmpire\" class=\"u-url mention\" rel=\"nofollow noopener noreferrer\" target=\"_blank\">@<span>UnsettlingEmpire</span></a></span> That’s fair. Even with Signal introducing usernames, they still need to store the phone number. And yes, they are subject to those, but their encryption is top of the line. There absolutely is metadata, and that’s a valid concern. I completely understand matrix in that regard. If it’s that important, you absolutely need to ensure you are using a private/anonymous naming for yourself. But encryption is great there as well.</p>",
"contentMap": {
"en": "<p><span class=\"h-card\" translate=\"no\"><a href=\"https://mastodon.social/@UnsettlingEmpire\" class=\"u-url mention\" rel=\"nofollow noopener noreferrer\" target=\"_blank\">@<span>UnsettlingEmpire</span></a></span> That’s fair. Even with Signal introducing usernames, they still need to store the phone number. And yes, they are subject to those, but their encryption is top of the line. There absolutely is metadata, and that’s a valid concern. I completely understand matrix in that regard. If it’s that important, you absolutely need to ensure you are using a private/anonymous naming for yourself. But encryption is great there as well.</p>"
},
"attachment": [],
"tag": [
{
"type": "Mention",
"href": "https://mastodon.social/users/UnsettlingEmpire",
"name": "@UnsettlingEmpire@mastodon.social"
}
],
"replies": {
"id": "https://infosec.exchange/users/dostalcody/statuses/113478344942102377/replies",
"type": "Collection",
"first": {
"type": "CollectionPage",
"next": "https://infosec.exchange/users/dostalcody/statuses/113478344942102377/replies?only_other_accounts=true&page=true",
"partOf": "https://infosec.exchange/users/dostalcody/statuses/113478344942102377/replies",
"items": []
}
},
"likes": {
"id": "https://infosec.exchange/users/dostalcody/statuses/113478344942102377/likes",
"type": "Collection",
"totalItems": 1
},
"shares": {
"id": "https://infosec.exchange/users/dostalcody/statuses/113478344942102377/shares",
"type": "Collection",
"totalItems": 0
}
}