ActivityPub Viewer

A small tool to view real-world ActivityPub objects as JSON! Enter a URL or username from Mastodon or a similar service below, and we'll send a request with the right Accept header to the server to view the underlying object.

Open in browser →
{ "@context": [ "https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams", { "ostatus": "http://ostatus.org#", "atomUri": "ostatus:atomUri", "inReplyToAtomUri": "ostatus:inReplyToAtomUri", "conversation": "ostatus:conversation", "sensitive": "as:sensitive", "toot": "http://joinmastodon.org/ns#", "votersCount": "toot:votersCount", "litepub": "http://litepub.social/ns#", "directMessage": "litepub:directMessage", "Hashtag": "as:Hashtag" } ], "id": "https://infosec.exchange/users/HoffmanLabs/statuses/114060140162047803", "type": "Note", "summary": null, "inReplyTo": null, "published": "2025-02-24T17:53:39Z", "url": "https://infosec.exchange/@HoffmanLabs/114060140162047803", "attributedTo": "https://infosec.exchange/users/HoffmanLabs", "to": [ "https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public" ], "cc": [ "https://infosec.exchange/users/HoffmanLabs/followers" ], "sensitive": false, "atomUri": "https://infosec.exchange/users/HoffmanLabs/statuses/114060140162047803", "inReplyToAtomUri": null, "conversation": "tag:infosec.exchange,2025-02-24:objectId=244992496:objectType=Conversation", "content": "<p>MUDs and the ability to reload new server without dropping connections (a “hotboot”)…</p><p><a href=\"https://boston.conman.org/2025/02/11.2\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" translate=\"no\"><span class=\"invisible\">https://</span><span class=\"\">boston.conman.org/2025/02/11.2</span><span class=\"invisible\"></span></a></p><p>…reminded me of an old RSX-11M application from an aeon ago, running part of a state government. </p><p>The app was too big for the PDP-11 (a common problem, as 32KW wasn&#39;t all that much even then), so the app removed the operating system from the computer, and ran, well, standalone.</p><p>Yes, you could do that back then. </p><p>That all worked swimmingly until somebody pressed ^C control-C on their terminal session, and the terminal driver then trapped into, well, nothingness.</p><p>Since the app code was too big for the PDP-11 it was running on, that smaller PDP-11 was shut down, the bigger local PDP-11 was switched over and re-booted and the app code loaded, and the bigger PDP-11 was then powered down.</p><p>The operator then pulled the core memory out of the bigger PDP-11, walked it over to the smaller PDP-11 and plugged it into the backplane, toggled in the address of the app&#39;s main loop onto the front panel switches, and toggled “go”, and off the smaller PDP-11 went running its too-big app.</p><p>Yeah, you could do a simple form of app checkpoint-restart with core memory, given core was persistent. And yeah, a bigger PDP-11 would have been helpful.</p><p>(Yes, SC was a creative administrator of those PDP-11 boxes. Swapping core never would have occurred to me.)</p><p><a href=\"https://infosec.exchange/tags/digitalequipment\" class=\"mention hashtag\" rel=\"tag\">#<span>digitalequipment</span></a> <a href=\"https://infosec.exchange/tags/retrocomputing\" class=\"mention hashtag\" rel=\"tag\">#<span>retrocomputing</span></a> <a href=\"https://infosec.exchange/tags/pdp11\" class=\"mention hashtag\" rel=\"tag\">#<span>pdp11</span></a> <a href=\"https://infosec.exchange/tags/corememory\" class=\"mention hashtag\" rel=\"tag\">#<span>corememory</span></a></p>", "contentMap": { "en": "<p>MUDs and the ability to reload new server without dropping connections (a “hotboot”)…</p><p><a href=\"https://boston.conman.org/2025/02/11.2\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" translate=\"no\"><span class=\"invisible\">https://</span><span class=\"\">boston.conman.org/2025/02/11.2</span><span class=\"invisible\"></span></a></p><p>…reminded me of an old RSX-11M application from an aeon ago, running part of a state government. </p><p>The app was too big for the PDP-11 (a common problem, as 32KW wasn&#39;t all that much even then), so the app removed the operating system from the computer, and ran, well, standalone.</p><p>Yes, you could do that back then. </p><p>That all worked swimmingly until somebody pressed ^C control-C on their terminal session, and the terminal driver then trapped into, well, nothingness.</p><p>Since the app code was too big for the PDP-11 it was running on, that smaller PDP-11 was shut down, the bigger local PDP-11 was switched over and re-booted and the app code loaded, and the bigger PDP-11 was then powered down.</p><p>The operator then pulled the core memory out of the bigger PDP-11, walked it over to the smaller PDP-11 and plugged it into the backplane, toggled in the address of the app&#39;s main loop onto the front panel switches, and toggled “go”, and off the smaller PDP-11 went running its too-big app.</p><p>Yeah, you could do a simple form of app checkpoint-restart with core memory, given core was persistent. And yeah, a bigger PDP-11 would have been helpful.</p><p>(Yes, SC was a creative administrator of those PDP-11 boxes. Swapping core never would have occurred to me.)</p><p><a href=\"https://infosec.exchange/tags/digitalequipment\" class=\"mention hashtag\" rel=\"tag\">#<span>digitalequipment</span></a> <a href=\"https://infosec.exchange/tags/retrocomputing\" class=\"mention hashtag\" rel=\"tag\">#<span>retrocomputing</span></a> <a href=\"https://infosec.exchange/tags/pdp11\" class=\"mention hashtag\" rel=\"tag\">#<span>pdp11</span></a> <a href=\"https://infosec.exchange/tags/corememory\" class=\"mention hashtag\" rel=\"tag\">#<span>corememory</span></a></p>" }, "attachment": [], "tag": [ { "type": "Hashtag", "href": "https://infosec.exchange/tags/digitalequipment", "name": "#digitalequipment" }, { "type": "Hashtag", "href": "https://infosec.exchange/tags/retrocomputing", "name": "#retrocomputing" }, { "type": "Hashtag", "href": "https://infosec.exchange/tags/pdp11", "name": "#pdp11" }, { "type": "Hashtag", "href": "https://infosec.exchange/tags/corememory", "name": "#corememory" } ], "replies": { "id": "https://infosec.exchange/users/HoffmanLabs/statuses/114060140162047803/replies", "type": "Collection", "first": { "type": "CollectionPage", "next": "https://infosec.exchange/users/HoffmanLabs/statuses/114060140162047803/replies?only_other_accounts=true&page=true", "partOf": "https://infosec.exchange/users/HoffmanLabs/statuses/114060140162047803/replies", "items": [] } }, "likes": { "id": "https://infosec.exchange/users/HoffmanLabs/statuses/114060140162047803/likes", "type": "Collection", "totalItems": 5 }, "shares": { "id": "https://infosec.exchange/users/HoffmanLabs/statuses/114060140162047803/shares", "type": "Collection", "totalItems": 5 } }