ActivityPub Viewer

A small tool to view real-world ActivityPub objects as JSON! Enter a URL or username from Mastodon or a similar service below, and we'll send a request with the right Accept header to the server to view the underlying object.

Open in browser →
{ "@context": [ "https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams", { "ostatus": "http://ostatus.org#", "atomUri": "ostatus:atomUri", "inReplyToAtomUri": "ostatus:inReplyToAtomUri", "conversation": "ostatus:conversation", "sensitive": "as:sensitive", "toot": "http://joinmastodon.org/ns#", "votersCount": "toot:votersCount", "litepub": "http://litepub.social/ns#", "directMessage": "litepub:directMessage", "Hashtag": "as:Hashtag" } ], "id": "https://infosec.exchange/users/realn2s/statuses/111605920209725128", "type": "Note", "summary": null, "inReplyTo": "https://infosec.exchange/users/realn2s/statuses/111603611961864032", "published": "2023-12-19T07:33:14Z", "url": "https://infosec.exchange/@realn2s/111605920209725128", "attributedTo": "https://infosec.exchange/users/realn2s", "to": [ "https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public" ], "cc": [ "https://infosec.exchange/users/realn2s/followers" ], "sensitive": false, "atomUri": "https://infosec.exchange/users/realn2s/statuses/111605920209725128", "inReplyToAtomUri": "https://infosec.exchange/users/realn2s/statuses/111603611961864032", "conversation": "tag:infosec.exchange,2023-12-18:objectId=118774018:objectType=Conversation", "content": "<p>Sleeping over it I noticed another issue with <a href=\"https://infosec.exchange/tags/Microsoft\" class=\"mention hashtag\" rel=\"tag\">#<span>Microsoft</span></a> <a href=\"https://infosec.exchange/tags/Entra\" class=\"mention hashtag\" rel=\"tag\">#<span>Entra</span></a> ID <a href=\"https://infosec.exchange/tags/Password\" class=\"mention hashtag\" rel=\"tag\">#<span>Password</span></a> </p><p>Regarding the Global banned password list they write &quot;The contents of the global banned password list aren&#39;t based on any external data source, but on the results of Microsoft Entra security telemetry and analysis.&quot;<br />(<a href=\"https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/entra/identity/authentication/concept-password-ban-bad\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" translate=\"no\"><span class=\"invisible\">https://</span><span class=\"ellipsis\">learn.microsoft.com/en-us/entr</span><span class=\"invisible\">a/identity/authentication/concept-password-ban-bad</span></a>)</p><p>Now I have more questions:</p><p>WHY are passwords part of the security telemetry data?</p><p>The only case where I see this as ok, would be in a honeypot.</p><p>And what kind of data would be in the security telemetry data? Usually it&#39;s failed attempts, so you risk overestimating passwords attacks which fail (anyway). Again, this would only be OK with honeypots.</p><p>But if you are getting your data solely from honeypots, I fear you&#39;re getting a pre-selected type of data. Namely opportunistic, random attacks not targeted attacks.</p><p>While I think it&#39;s valuable to protect against these kind ob attacks, I really would like passwords to withstand even targeted attacks, even from the inside.<br />E.g when the attackers are in the Lateral Movement or Privilege Escalation. Especially if the attackers can start to crack hashes.</p><p>For this Microsoft Entra ID Password Protection seems completely useless there.</p><p><a href=\"https://infosec.exchange/tags/Cybersecurity\" class=\"mention hashtag\" rel=\"tag\">#<span>Cybersecurity</span></a> <a href=\"https://infosec.exchange/tags/Fail\" class=\"mention hashtag\" rel=\"tag\">#<span>Fail</span></a> <a href=\"https://infosec.exchange/tags/SecurityFail\" class=\"mention hashtag\" rel=\"tag\">#<span>SecurityFail</span></a></p>", "contentMap": { "en": "<p>Sleeping over it I noticed another issue with <a href=\"https://infosec.exchange/tags/Microsoft\" class=\"mention hashtag\" rel=\"tag\">#<span>Microsoft</span></a> <a href=\"https://infosec.exchange/tags/Entra\" class=\"mention hashtag\" rel=\"tag\">#<span>Entra</span></a> ID <a href=\"https://infosec.exchange/tags/Password\" class=\"mention hashtag\" rel=\"tag\">#<span>Password</span></a> </p><p>Regarding the Global banned password list they write &quot;The contents of the global banned password list aren&#39;t based on any external data source, but on the results of Microsoft Entra security telemetry and analysis.&quot;<br />(<a href=\"https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/entra/identity/authentication/concept-password-ban-bad\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" translate=\"no\"><span class=\"invisible\">https://</span><span class=\"ellipsis\">learn.microsoft.com/en-us/entr</span><span class=\"invisible\">a/identity/authentication/concept-password-ban-bad</span></a>)</p><p>Now I have more questions:</p><p>WHY are passwords part of the security telemetry data?</p><p>The only case where I see this as ok, would be in a honeypot.</p><p>And what kind of data would be in the security telemetry data? Usually it&#39;s failed attempts, so you risk overestimating passwords attacks which fail (anyway). Again, this would only be OK with honeypots.</p><p>But if you are getting your data solely from honeypots, I fear you&#39;re getting a pre-selected type of data. Namely opportunistic, random attacks not targeted attacks.</p><p>While I think it&#39;s valuable to protect against these kind ob attacks, I really would like passwords to withstand even targeted attacks, even from the inside.<br />E.g when the attackers are in the Lateral Movement or Privilege Escalation. Especially if the attackers can start to crack hashes.</p><p>For this Microsoft Entra ID Password Protection seems completely useless there.</p><p><a href=\"https://infosec.exchange/tags/Cybersecurity\" class=\"mention hashtag\" rel=\"tag\">#<span>Cybersecurity</span></a> <a href=\"https://infosec.exchange/tags/Fail\" class=\"mention hashtag\" rel=\"tag\">#<span>Fail</span></a> <a href=\"https://infosec.exchange/tags/SecurityFail\" class=\"mention hashtag\" rel=\"tag\">#<span>SecurityFail</span></a></p>" }, "updated": "2023-12-22T08:46:53Z", "attachment": [], "tag": [ { "type": "Hashtag", "href": "https://infosec.exchange/tags/microsoft", "name": "#microsoft" }, { "type": "Hashtag", "href": "https://infosec.exchange/tags/entra", "name": "#entra" }, { "type": "Hashtag", "href": "https://infosec.exchange/tags/password", "name": "#password" }, { "type": "Hashtag", "href": "https://infosec.exchange/tags/cybersecurity", "name": "#cybersecurity" }, { "type": "Hashtag", "href": "https://infosec.exchange/tags/fail", "name": "#fail" }, { "type": "Hashtag", "href": "https://infosec.exchange/tags/securityfail", "name": "#securityfail" } ], "replies": { "id": "https://infosec.exchange/users/realn2s/statuses/111605920209725128/replies", "type": "Collection", "first": { "type": "CollectionPage", "next": "https://infosec.exchange/users/realn2s/statuses/111605920209725128/replies?min_id=111606062404362282&page=true", "partOf": "https://infosec.exchange/users/realn2s/statuses/111605920209725128/replies", "items": [ "https://infosec.exchange/users/realn2s/statuses/111606062404362282" ] } }, "likes": { "id": "https://infosec.exchange/users/realn2s/statuses/111605920209725128/likes", "type": "Collection", "totalItems": 1 }, "shares": { "id": "https://infosec.exchange/users/realn2s/statuses/111605920209725128/shares", "type": "Collection", "totalItems": 0 } }